notice that there, that arguments are based on either the united nations have come up with united nations resolution security council general assembly. the 2004 non binding court opinion of the i, c j back then and so on and so forth. so this, you always build precedence and you always build arguments on those arguments accumulate. and one argument been can help in another port over another argument. and yes, we would do move from the court like the i c, j. the discusses issues on the printer between the states to the i c. c, to the international criminal court. what do you discuss more? the responsibility for example of is there any there's up, is there any genitals or has been responsible for crimes? wherefore does where the where, where given where people died, what killed in more that we know that was in every possible aspect of its execute action was illegal. so i think is really, is, is there any need, those should worry, moving forward about that they will end up in prison, orton or in the hague because they are unfortunately continued to be shifted by the united states as we've heard in the arguments earlier. but i think onc

palestine and the golan, in line with security council resolution 465 of 19 ( for the united nations, the international organization, in particular, the general assembly and the security council should consider the additional measures and binding international legitimacy tools stipulated in the charter that are required to immediately end the illegal occupation and take the necessary measures to ensure. the implementation of its relevant resolutions without any further delay. your honors, just as a reminder, today we are talking about huge record of un resolutions that israel keeps violating. actually, when it comes to the arab israeli conflict, we are talking about 180 resolutions of the general assembly and 200 27 resolutions of the security council. mr. president, allow me now to move to the part of the question regarding discriminatory legislations and measures. since its inception, israel has adopted various discriminatory legislations aimed to ensuring its control over the maximum geography with the minimum possible. number of palestinians, the united nations human rights council has described the israeli discriminatory measures as and i quote,

the treaty-based and charter-based mechanisms of the united nations and is recalled in resolutions of the security council and the general assembly. these policies and practices have reach..." the threshold of a partide within the meaning ascribed it in the international convention on the suppression and punishment of the crime of a partit. while israel is not a party to the part convention, the fourth report on paremptary norms of general international law, cogens by the international law commission special rapporteur, found that the apart convention codified what was already a crime under under customary international law, and that this crime has huce cov'. the prohibition of apart and racial discrimination is therefore a peremptory norm of international law and binding on all states, including israel. mr. president, members of the court, israel's total disdain and their disrespect for these principles result in the occupation being inherently and fundamentally illegal in terms of international law, just as south africa's prolonged presence in namibia was found by this court to be illegal. mr. president, members of the court, f

, the charges of the charter of the united nations and the respective resolution approved by the security council, the... human rights council and the general assembly, as pacifist country, the plurinational state considers that the only alternative to guarantee a just and lasting peace in the conflict between israel and palestine must be the obligation for all states to contribute to dialogue and negotiation with clear expression of political will from both parties to achieve two-state solution, consolidating a free, sovereign and independent state state, palestinian state, as it established with the pre 1967 international borders with east jerusalem as its capital in accordance with the relevant security council and general assembly resolution. following the principles of international law and peace, bolivia recognized palestine as an independent and sovereign state on the 17 of december 200. 10 along the 1967 border, because it meets all the traditional criteria for statehood, all states have common, but differentiated responsibilities and the obligations to provide solidarity, assistance to the palestinian people, accordingly, and despite its ec

united nations. the organization has a particular responsibility the organization of the united nations, and specifically the general assembly and security council must take all the necessary measures to ensure the implementation of the relevant resolutions without today and examine additional measures necessary to put an end to oval, remove old obstacles to the realization in the way of the palestinian people to his right to self determination put an end to the person who owns occupation colonization alex ation about his the entire tree by israel into major. but measures aim to a change in the democratic composition. the cartridge of the holy city of jerusalem, distinguished members of the court living and request the court to find that you have jurisdiction to respond to the request for advisory opinion contained in 77 to 47. to do this in the light of our written and oral comments, ladies and gentlemen, members of the court, late both jump on the 2nd one said, if you want peace, form justice, defend life. if you want life, embrace the truth as the highest judicial authority in order globalized world. lebanon urges you to help in giving justice to the but a senior and people. so we can have peace in them at the least. thank you. i see

partition resolution concerning and quote. this responsibility continues as confirmed by the unequivocal and contemporary practice of the general assembly, the security council as well as other united nations organs and bodies and as the court has previously reiterated in its wall advice. opinion there exists and i quote, a permanent responsibility of the united nations towards the question of palestine until the question is resolved in all its aspects in satisfactory manner in accordance with international legitimacy, and quote. the questions put before the court by the assembly does seek the court's legal guidance on matters of fundamental and longstanding importance and concern to the. united nations. third, all of the ground for declining to issue an opinion suggested in the submissions of few states fall far short of constituting compelling reasons that must exist for the court to refrain from answering the general assembly questions. some of these submissions oppose the advisory opinion because of the proported existence of negotiation framework or of bilateral negotiations. however, none of these considerations constitutes a reasonable basis for the court to refuse the general assem

resolution concerning palestine and quote. this responsibility continues as confirmed by the unequivocal and contemporary practice of the general assembly to security council, as well as other united nations organs and bodies. and this, the quote had previously reiterated its wall advisor opinion there exists and i quote, a permanent responsibility of the united nations towards the question of palestine . until the question is resolved in all its aspects in a satisfactory manner. in accordance with international legitimacy and quote, the questions put before the quote by the assembly, thus seek the quotes legion guidance on matters of fundamental and longstanding importance and concern to the united nations. 3rd off the ground for declining to issue an opinion suggested into submission of a few states, fault for short of constituting compelling reasons that must exist for the quote to refrain from answering the general assemblies. questions. some of these submissions oppose the advisory opinion because of the purported existence of a negotiation framework or electronic negotiations. however, none of these considerations constitutes a reasonable basis for the court to refuse the general as

united nations, in particular the general assembly and the security council, it should consider the additional measures and binding binding international legitimacy tools stipulated in the charter that are required to ensure the implementation of the relevant resolutions without any further delay, including the immediate and unconditional end to the israeli occupation of the occupied arab territories in palestine and the syrian julian. the honorable judges, the syrian arab republic affirms the principle that states shall not obtain legal rights from unilateral acts that do not comply with international law. syria or also reemphasized the temporary nature of the occupation and that even if it is fair company, this does not and will not give the occupying power the right to ac. acquire sovereignty over the occupied territories, no matter how long this brutal occupation last. syria retates that the stability of the middle east and the credibility of the united nations system, including the esteemed court, require taking measures to ensure the implementation of all relevant international resolutions to end the israeli occupation of all occupied arab territory. ories in accordance with the relevant united nations resolutions. mr. president, esteemed member

united nations security council, and they have been officially passed by the government . they speak for palestine, but the zionist regime does not agree with this resolution and in general with t the united nations and even the general assemblythe united nations do not pay attention, so i would like to say that the zionists, by this decision, show that they are a totalitarian government, a fascist government, and they do not have the slightest right for the palestinians, and above all , their own racial nature. showing and showing that none of the international rules and even talks and suggestions. their own allies are not committed either, and all of palestine, referring to the issue of my allies , is exactly one of my questions about the fact that american officials have said many times before that the only way to secure the zionist regime is to if the government is formed and an independent palestinian state takes this action, is it possible to affect the relations between the zionist regime and the united states in the democratic government ? in order to satisfy the palestinians and solve the palestinian issue , a palestinian government should be formed alongside the israeli government . council resolutions the united na