guest: russia has a very large nuclear force, the united states and russia combined have 95% of the world's 13,000 nuclear weapons. right now as we speak, the united states and russia have about 1400 nuclear warheads on long-range systems, land-based and sea-based missiles on submarines and on long-range bombers. russia also has a force of approximately estimated to be about 1000 shorter range nuclear warheads. these are sometimes called battlefield or tactical nuclear weapons. they are extremely destructive in terms of the size and any one of these weapons are enough to destroy a city as in hiroshima or nagasaki. the united states has about 250 of these shorter ranged weapons, 160 or so of which are stored in five nato bases. and so, that has been the condition for the last several years, but as large as those arsenals are, they are lower than they were during the height of the cold war in the mid-1980's. united states and russia had a combined force of about 70,000 nuclear weapons, not all of those deployed. so true nuclear arms control and reduction agreements that republican and democra

lines on that comment. andre, toward a check of the general to the general council secretary of united russia party saying that will be immediate, socio economic handouts on the help from russia to republics as well. she monetary and aid and tons of it is reportedly on the way. he also said that for example, um key ever has been the people that donates can lugens area from, from really maintaining what are their russian roots, whether it's in education forms in language forms as well. they're not allowed to speak russian then, as we understand, half of the evacuees are old children right now. one more comment by the way, from denise bushland, the head of the donate republic. he said that russian troops are not there, but they have the right to be there with these new decrees signed by the russian president. they have agreements now to share economic issues between themselves, humanitarian support, and that of military support as well. a pushy, lynn was just ask if peace is still possible. he remains somewhat optimistic, but basically saying to achieve peace, we need a dialogue with key f and

if russia proceeds we will rally progression. the united states and allies around the world are ready to impose powerful sanctions. we will put intense pressure on the largest most significant financial institutions and key industries. ready to go as soon as if russia moves appeared we will put those long-term consequences under -- that undermine russia's ability to compete strategically and economically. and when it comes to nordstrom 2, the pipeline that will bring gas from russia to germany, if russia further invades ukraine, it will not happen. i will not send american servicemen to fight in ukraine. we have supplied military and equipment to help them defend themselves. we provided training and advice, and intelligence with the same purpose. make no mistake, the united states will defend every inch of nato territory with a full force of american power. the attack against one nato country is attack against all of us. the united states commitment to article v is sacrosanct. already, response to russia's buildup of troops i and additional

if russia attacked the united states, our allies, like the stopped up cyber attacks against our companies or critical infrastructures, we will respond. two paths are still open, for the sake of responsibility. russia and united states share for global stability, for the sake of our common future to choose diplomacy. but let there be no doubt, if russia commits this by ukraine, responsible nations around the world will not hesitate to respond. we do not stand for freedom. we surely will play date -- pay a steeper price tomorrow. thank you, i will keep you informed. health advocates testify about improving mental health care for ch

if russia attacked the united states, our allies, like the stopped up cyber attacks against our companies or critical infrastructures, we will respond. two paths are still open, for the sake of responsibility. russia and united states share for global stability, for the sake of our common future to choose diplomacy. but let there be no doubt, if russia commits this by ukraine, responsible nations around the world will not hesitate to respond. we do not stand for freedom. we surely will play date -- pay a steeper price tomorrow. thank you, i will keep you informed. >> here many of those conversations on c-span's and new podcast. >> season one focuses on the presidency of lyndon johnson. you will hear about the civil rights act. the market on selma and the war in vietnam. not everyone knew they were being recorded. certainly, johnson secretaries new because they were taxed with transcribing many of those conversations. exact, they were the ones who make sure the conversations were taped as johnson would signal to them which in his office and they are us. you'll also hear some talk. i want t

russia and ukraine. from the beginning of this crisis, i have been absolutely clear and consistent. the unitedtates is prepared, no matter what happens. we are ready with diplomacy, to engage in diplomacy with russia and our allies and partners to improve stability and security in europe as a whole and we are ready to respond decisively to russian attacks on ukraine. which is still very much a possibility. all of the events over the last few weeks and months, this has been our approach. it remains our approach now. so today, i want to speak to the american people about the situation on the ground, the steps we have taken, the actions we are prepared to take, and what this sayest rest and the -- what's at stake for us and the world -- says for us and the world and how this may impact us at home. for weeks, together our allies and partners, my administration has engaged in nonstop diplomacy. this week and i spoke again with president putin to make clear that we are ready to keep pursuing high-level diplomacy to reach understanding among russia, united states and the nation of your to address --

if russia proceeds we will rally the world to oppose its aggression. the united states and our allies and partners around the world are ready to impose powerful sanctions on controls including actors that did not, we did not pursue when russia invaded crimea and eastern ukraine in 2014. we will put intense pressure on their largest and most significant one in solicitations and key industries. these measures are ready to go as soon and if russia moves. we will impose long-term consequences to undermine russia's ability to compete economically and strategically and when it comes to nord stream ii the pipeline that would bring natural gas from russia to germany if russia further invades ukraine it will not happen. i will not send american servicemen to fightot in ukraine if they equipment to defend themselves and provide training and advice and intelligence for the same purpose and make no mistake the united states will defend every inch of nato territory with the full force of american power. an attack against one nato country is an attack against all of us. the un

chairman of the russian state duma committee on international affairs and member of the ruling united russia party. thank you so much of it just left her coming on the show a bit of 1st ask about why there are nuclear weapons drills today happening. russia has the largest number nuclear weapons warheads in the world. why? why is russia doing this today? amidst all this worldwide tension, russia is conducting exercises almost on a daily basis. the ministry of the fans has the wrong $200.00 drills a year. it includes exercises of all forces including the strategic forces, of course, as oh, why now? i think it's also a message to the west that we're serious about talking about security. and we have something to present. russian is a nuclear superpower, as well as the united states of america. and that should be taken into account. just a reminder. when suddenly a reminder of weapons of mass destruction, what did you make of the west exec corporate consultant who's now by the secretary of state antony blinking, claiming that russia could use weapons of mass destruction, great war in europe. he s

the head of the united russia party has this message for ukraine.y turchak: if you are not going to start sharing, russian military will help donetsk and luhansk military to stop ukrainian aggression. that is it. that is it. but, again, right now, there is no russian military in donetsk and luhansk. >> lots of people around the world are asking, why is this all happening now? lyse doucet gave me her view from kiev. lyse: it is a big question -- why would president putin make his assessment now? perhaps he saw a moment of weakness, after the chaotic debacle, the pull out of the u.s.-led nato forces from afghanisn in august, president biden turning away to focus on domestic conces, that criticism among european countries of the united states and president biden, that that insulted him, it there had not been the kind of unified planning that perhaps there should have been, and perha president putin sensed weakness in the western alliance. also, he has been preparing, russia has been preparing, strengthening itsreparedness in the sense that gas prices a

united states and russia class monday at the united nations security council over the crisis in ukraine. the u.s. accused russia appearing to invade ukraine by amassing over 100,000 troops on its border but russia rejected the charge claiming it was the united states and nato who are trying to push russia into war. this is russia's u.n. ambassador. >> our western colleagues are talking about the need for de-escalation. however, first and foremost, they themselves are whipping up tensions and rhetoric and are provoking escalation. the discussions about a threat of war is provocative in and of itself. you are almost calling for this. you want it to happen. amy: lastly, president biden placed 8500 troops on high alert. the u.s. and nato allies are shipping weapons to ukraine on the diplomatic front the secretary of state tony blinken said to speak with his russian counterpart by phone today. u.s. senators are preparing to unveil a bill imposing was headed robert menendez described as the mother of all sanctions targeting putin, russian banks, and other entities. more on the crisis over ukr

if russia precedes we will sirally the world against this aggression the united states andte her allies and partners around the world are ready to impose a powerful sanctions on export controls including we did not pursue when russia invaded crimea in eastern ukraine in 2014. we will put intensive pressure on the largest and most significant financial institutions and key industries. these measures are ready to go as soon and if russia moves. we will impose a long-term consequences to compete economically and strategically with comes in nord stream2 the pipeline that would bring natural gas will not send american servicemen to fight wein ukraine. it supplied you cranium it to help defend themselves provided training and advice and intelligence of the same purpose and make no mistake the united states will defend every inch of nato territory of the full force of american power and attack against one nato country is an attack against all of us. the united states commitment to article five is sacrosanct. already, response to russia's buildup of troops to bolster nader's eastern flank. simi

and i work at d, w ah, ah ah, this is dw news coming to live from berlin, presenting the united front against russia, germany united states, our close friend reliable partners, and we can count on one another. u. s. president joe biden, and german chancellor, all of sholtes say they stand united in their response to any russian aggression against the crane. and we'll work together to find a diplomatic solution to the standoff. also coming up french president emanuel, my con, makes his diplomatic push in moscow. after talks with president putin back on says the next few days will be decisive in efforts to avoid an escalation of the ukraine crisis and rebuilding from the ashes people affected by last year's volcanic eruption on the spanish island of la palmer plan to build back better ah, hello, i'm terry martin. good to have you with us diplomatic efforts are intensifying on both sides of the atlantic to resolve the ukraine crisis in washington. u. s. president joe biden held talks with german chancellor, olaf shoulds biden's stress that germany is a reliable partner and that they will work together

russia. this year talking about and the united states has also my fear. it's got no intention of fighting russia directly of sending troops. the ukraine, it is going to deploy troops to nathan members, stays close to cry, and also on rushes, borders summer, describing that as an escalation old, the whole situation of, you know, the build up on the russian thought as well as a tinderbox. like scenario, how bad do you think things could get with both sides engaging in saber rattling well, it's really hard to say for sure how hot this could get. but i certainly hope that escalated from here, but this is absolutely an act of aggression against the russian government against the russian people. after the soviet union, dissolved in 1991 nato promise that it would not move another inch eastward. and despite that promise, we now have talks that ukraine may join nato, and if that happens, that is just putting russia on the border with another. nato friendly, another nato member state, which is, in my opinion, a threat to the sovereignty of the russian people. and t

there was the view that the color revolutions on the border of russia were an effort by the effort by the united states to turn regimes against russia and dress rehearsal for destabilizing russia itself. putin has a long list of grievances. they have become -- they disagreed with what we did in iraq. they disagreed with what we did in kosovo. they disagreed with what we did in libya. long string of abuses that soured the relationship. and the challenge now -- tino, i would like your view -- i think it would be interesting to hear your view and rose's view now. but we have gone so far in our relations with russia from where it was in the bush administration, where we did not consider missile defense as directed against russian strategic central systems in any way. maybe given that relationship we need to think about whether we want, in fact a capability against russian strategic nuclear weapons. and increasingly, with things like the sm 3 missile and the deployment. aegis ships and the like we are developing some limited capability. i still think it is not significant, and the russians can overwh

on that, the united states and russia had common interest. in north korea developing ballistic missiles and nuclear weapons are closer to russia and they are the united states. moses points, yes, there's a proliferation of missile defenses but that's because this proliferation of ballistic missile capabilities, lots of nations are developing those capabilities and lots of nations feel vulnerable to them and want defense as a way to protect themselves. it is not ballistic missile defenses that kill people, it's ballistic missiles that kill people so i think you had a transition of mission but at the same time the technologies were coming she had capabilities against omitted attacks, particularly tactical peter ballistic missiles. if you think about what the israelis have done to develop capabilities against those missiles as well as our own, it's a pretty good story. it's not perfect but a good story. we should come back later on this issue about the russian and chinese threats and what the role of most missile defenses and back. to answer you

russia. the intelligence units in russia that launched these cyberattacks in ukraine. the banks, the defense ministry, other critically important operations in ukraine. it was unclear previously who was responsible. they now say it was russia and they're also warning the russians could launch further attacks as well as going after locations in the u.s. what is the reaction there? i'm not sure that jim sciutto heard us. we'll continue to follow this. this element of cyberwarfare is exploding right now. there is enormous fear at the white house, the defense department, the cia, that it is about to get. so worse. everybody stand by. we're following all the breaking news. very, very strong words from the president of the united states. >>> also, another major story we're following, breaking news, the national archives now confirming it has found classified documents in boxes of president trump's at mar-a-lago. >>> plus, officer kim potter indicted for killing of dante wright. ththroughout history i've observed markets shaped by thehe intentional and unforeseeable. for inin

we agreed a comprehensive document which we sent over to russia as our common response, as our united response to the legally binding treaties that russia proposed for us some weeks ago. and this is the agreed basis. this is an agreed message, exactly as boris said. we list areas we're ready to sit and discuss on arms control missiles, nuclear, and many other issues. the point is that it has to be verifiable and balanced. and then we list also some areas where we cannot make compromises, especially the right for every nation to choose its own path. and the right of course for nato to defend and protect all allies. this idea that we should introduce some kind of second-class allies, those allies that have joined nato after 1997, is absolutely not acceptable for us. but verifiable, balanced arms control, that's something we absolutely are in favor of and ready to engage in with russia. let me just briefly also add that the military adaptation sends a clear signal that russia has a choice. they can either choose a diplomatic solution and we are ready to sit down, but if they choose confr

the united states, russia after the collapse of soviet union and ukraine. e three top countries assessing nuclear arsenal. we abandoned it in return for security guarantees in particular by the united states. we were promised that if anyone attacks us, the united states will be among countries who will be helping us. second, what is happening in ukraine is not only about ukraine. president putin challenges world order. if the west fails in ukraine, the next target of putin will be one of the nato members on its eastern flank. third, if putin succeeds in ukraine, other players across the globe who want to change rules, who want to bypass the united states, they'll see this is possible, that the west is uncapable of defending what it stands for. i think all in all, the u.s. citizens, americans should be interested in keeping the world order as it stands and the future of the order is being decided right now in ukraine. >> and lastly, sir, what do you want in the next round of sanctions? we only have a few seconds left. tell us what you can. do you want more ol

states and our allies and partners will respond in a united and decisive way. the world will hold russia accountable. thank you. >> i think the representative of the united states for her statement. i would now like to give the floor to the representative of the united kingdom who asks to make a further statement. >> thank you. as we sat in this chamber urging russia to step back, president putin announced special military operations on ukrainian territory. this is unprovoked and unjustified. this is a great day for ukraine and for the principles of the united nations. we and our partners have been clear that there will be consequences for russia's actions. we fully support the united states' call for u.n. security council resolution. this council must do all it can to stop the war and uphold the charter. thank you. >> i think representative of the united kingdom and now give the floor to the representative of albania who also wished to make , a further statement. >> dear colleagues. we could not end this meeting with what we have feared and anticipated is happening. explosions are repor

that biden had been threatening actually was now white and did say that the united states has no intention of fighting russia. now that certainly flies in the face of the fact that the united states has been supplying the government and with quite a few weapons over the past few years. that nato has been expanding and sat around now in his remarks biden, accused of russia of engaging and what he called false flag events. and then he said there was no question that russia is the aggressor. so it's pretty clear that it's biting is disapproving of these moves, you know, taken by russia, recognizing the republics. it's pretty clear that there will be a new round of sanctions imposed on russia, but many are looking on and wondering if this really won't be as dramatic as us. officials have made it out to be over the past couple of weeks. quite an interesting and rather brief set of comments from joe biden like that will get back to you as a more commentary managers from the united states from washington. thanks so much now or another headlines, no more shopping in milan and parting in central bay. that's a tweet f

the free world is united. russiaas a choice between war and all the suffering it will bring, or diplomacy that will

states and our allies and partners will respond in a united and decisive way. the world will hold russia accountable. thank you. >> i think the representative from the united states. i would now like to give the floor to the representative from the united states -- united kingdom. >> thank you. as we sat in this chamber urging russia to step back, president putin announced special military operations on ukrainian territory. this is unprovoked and unjustified. this is a grave day for ukraine and for the principles of the united nations. we and our partners have been clear that there will be consequences for russia's actions. we fully support the united states calls for un security council resolution. this counsel must do all it can to stop the war and uphold the charter. thank you. >> i think the representative of the united kingdom. now i will give the floor to the representative of albania who also wishes to make a further statement. >> dear colleagues. we could not have anticipated this happening. rishaad: various envoys to the united nations. the ukrainian envoy they're talking a shor

evgeny popov is one of the russian politicians targeted by western sanctions, he's an mp from united russiaountries could end up by hurting them more. sanctions against our economy, it's a serious step. but our economy is strong, its logo is really slow but it's strong, its logo is really slow but its strong. and we are going to live normally. think about you, think about your people, think about american people. you will get shy energy prices very soon. how many families in great britain would be glad to pay twice or third prize for energy? glad to pay twice or third prize for ener: ? �* ., ,., �* glad to pay twice or third prize for ener: ? i, ,., �* . energy? bought something we've heard re eated b energy? bought something we've heard repeated by other _ repeated by other russian politicians. well, let's taker a closer look at europe's reliance on russian gas and what it could mean for prices. joining me is kateryna filippenko, from the global energy consultancy i suppose what is likely to happen immediately to surprise them prices and also where? the immediately to surprise them prices

chairman of the russian state duma committee on international affairs and member of the ruling united russia party. thank you so much. have it to suffer. coming on the show, i been a 1st ask about why there are nuclear weapons drills today happening. russia has the largest number nuclear weapons warheads in the world. why? why is russia doing this today? i made all this world wide tension. russia is conducting exercises almost on a daily basis. the most from the found says around $200.00 drills a year. it includes exercises of all forces including the strategic forces, of course, as oh, what, why now i think it's also message to the west that we're serious about talking about security. and we have something to present. russian is a nuclear superpower, as well as the united states. of america, and that should be taken into account. just a reminder might certainly a reminder of weapons of mass destruction. what did you make of the west exact corporate consultant who's now by the secretary of state. and he blinked him, claiming that russia could use weapons of mass destruction, great war in eur

united nations. we and our partners have been clear that there will be consequences for russia's actions. fully support the united states' call for u.n. security council resolution. this council must do ul it can to stop the war and uphold the charter. thank you. >> i thank representative to have united kingdom and give the floor to the representative of albania who also wished to make a further statement. >> dear colleagues. we could not end this meeting with what we have feared and anticipated is happening. explosions are reported in kyiv and several of the cities in ukraine. tanks are -- as we speak, russia is -- its plan in attacking a neighbor to whom it decided to deny existence, freedom, land, dignity and life. we call on all of the members of the united nations to rally support. to stand with ukraine and its people, to condemn fully this aagree, stand for peace, rules, international law and whatever measures they deem necessary to show their actions will bear consequences. to reiterate, russia will be held responsible for causing pain and destruction. for bringing -- choosing to d

chairman of the russian say, do my committee on intellectual affairs and member of the ruling united russia party. you know, joe biden says to the citizens of russia, you are not our enemy, and i do not believe you want to bloody destructive war against you. crane. do you think that the united states is making a push here to perhaps try and make an alliance with russia to attack the greatest enemy to a u. s. interest, which is of course, china, the most powerful economic country by purchasing power parity in the world at the moment. oh, 1st of all, if this is an attempt to send some alliance with russia, it's a very unsuccessful attempt. i would say, i wish i could read and he could read the american national security doctrine and nuclear, both churn defense review and other documents which underlying american for him and defense policy. in these all, all documents, russia is named as the enemy. and some of them as a think enemy number one. so no, that contradicts many things. you read, they were not the enemy, the russian people. why the list of only the titles of, of bills, laws at which

and whatever action russia undertakes next, the united states is ready. it likely what comes out of this the diplomatic angle is being pursued, obviously. is it likely we are going to see an arms treaty, a situation where russia starts negotiating with us. we've heard there's already talks about moving the tomahawk missiles and reciprocal move from their side. is that a likely outcome here? and wouldn't be a scenario where vladimir putin gets a g.i. got what i wanted. >> secretary lincoln meeting with his counterparts surrogate we are prepared alongside her allies on mutual concern comes security. and that would include reciprocal on missiles of greater transparency measures. it would include some mechanisms to reduce the possibility of mistake or escalation if there incidents at sea or in the air. we are prepared to do all about. just as we have been over the course of the past decades in the cold war and after freight if russia wants to sit at the table and do that we are prepared to come flanked by allies and partners and negotiate an outcome along tho

guest: russia has a very large nuclear force, the united states and russia combined have 95% of the world'snuclear weapons. right now as we speak, the united states and russia have about 1400 nuclear warheads on long-range systems, land-based and sea-based missiles on submarines and on long-range bombers. russia also has a force of approximately estimated to be about 1000 shorter range nuclear warheads. these are sometimes called battlefield or tactical nuclear weapons. they are extremely destructive in terms of the size and any one of these weapons are enough to destroy a city as in hiroshima or nagasaki. the united states has about 250 of these shorter ranged weapons, 160 or so of which are stored in five nato bases. and so, that has been the condition for the last several years, but as large as those arsenals are, they are lower than they were during the height of the cold war in the mid-1980's. united states and russia had a combined force of about 70,000 nuclear weapons, not all of those deployed. so true nuclear arms control and reduction agreements that republican and democratic pres

russia has said over and over again. it doesn't plan to invade that. what it does want is the united states in nature to give some security guarantees to russia about the use of need of nato troops or advanced weapons in ukraine and other words prohibiting that in the future. but if a russian doesn't invade now the united states can say c. r preemptive actions are unifying actions where all of the nato countries stood together, prevented the russians from carrying out aggression. and at the same time, they continue to paint russia. here in the united states and in western public opinion as the aggressor as the big threats. this is a very clever propaganda device when, when you think about the fact that if the united states and nato, which are promising that they will put advanced weapons on russia's border. not russia promising to put advanced weapons on the us mexican border or the u. s. canadian border, you, you see what the objective reality is. and yet the united states media operation in this propaganda campaign can present russia as the aggressor. so it's kind of a win win situ

states and our allies and partners will respond in a unit and decisive way the world will whole russia accountable. thank you. hear lou. i think the representative united states for a statement and i like to give the floor to the percent of the united kingdom, who asked to make a fair statement from him as we sat in as we sat in this chamber urging russia to step back, president putin announced special military operations on ukrainian territory. this is unprovoked, an unjustified. this is a great day for ukraine. and for the principles of the united nations. we and our partners have been clear that there will be consequences for russia's actions. we fully support the united states call for un security council resolution. this council must do all it can to stop the war and uphold the charter. thank you. would interesting, i think representative united kingdom and now i'll give the flow to the representative of albania here. also wish to make a fair statement. your colleagues, we could not in this meeting that what we had feared and anticipated since days is happening. explosions are rep

russia. not the united states. the fastest way to the escalate the situation for all involved would be for russia tissues to the escalate its mobilization forces. the united states is responding to the active sustained buildup of military pressure on ukraine. we are doing so in lockstep with allies and at the same time we have been extremely forward leaning in our willingness to engage in diplomacy, to address the mutual concerns of russia, the europeans, and the united states when it comes to european security. >> the vice president is going to germany for a conference. why isn't present brian going -- why isn't president biden going? second question, next week the brazilian president is going to russia to meet with vladimir putin. how does the white house see this visit and the timing of this visit? do you guys expect anything from the brazilian president during this meeting? >> if you look at a catalog of the engagements the president has had with his allies and partners including the engagement he had today, tha

is pretty united on that opinion as well. they say that russia's actions paid the way for a full scale invasion and also a quite united in offering support to ukraine. so what exactly is that support then, or is johnson just last night spoke to present the lensky of ukraine, assuring him of this support today we had from the ukrainian basset to the united kingdom. and he specifically said that what you cry needs is economic support. so that ukraine can then defend itself to date far as johnson in the house of commons reiterates this unwavering support. he reminded the house that britain has done everything possible training 22000 troops and sending 2000 weapons back in january and is now saying that the united kingdom will do even more. and we'll send even more troops to nato member states on the east and flank. we also know today the russian ambassador has been summoned to the foreign office, although the foreign office, as that's not to excel hand, at least not yet. smith, trust, the foreign secretary. she's also been speaking today and she's urg

russia saying that the failure of the united states and nato to engage on its core demands, as i mentioned, about nato there, that it may have to turn, resort to things that include military technical measures. now russia's used that sort of language before, several weeks ago, but to use it again in this context throws a really dark cloud over what could be coming next. also saying that because the united states and nato continue to deploy forces to poland, to romania, this is undermining the sort of atmosphere upon which to have these diplomatic talks that are so desired by the united states and by nato and allies. >> nic, big developments there. thank you very much. we are standing by, just a reminder to everyone, we'll bring it to you live when we hear from secretary of state tony blinken now at the u.n., sitting with the u.n. security council who will be bringing that to you very shortly. in the meantime s, joining me n, oh and here it is. >> a goal we all share, despite russia's persistent violations, these agreements which were negotiated in 2014 and 2015 and signed by russia, remain

a band substance and her games on old ah, i'm get out as welcome to the program, the united states has urged russia to declare that it has no intention of invading ukraine. speaking at the united nations security council, you are a secretary of state antony, blinking repeated warnings that russia was poised to launch an attack. russia insisted that its withdrawing troops and accused ukraine of failing to implement a previous piece deal. meanwhile, there are reports of fighting and ukraine's east with the government and pro russian separatists accusing each other of carrying out shelling attacks in this government held village in eastern ukraine, a kindergarten hit by a shell. the ukrainian army says the shell that was fired from the other side with his camera there where you can see this hole in the wall and it fell into place where the kids were going to have their gym class. luckily none of the kids was inside that room, let them get another kid is navarro. children were having breakfast at the time and were planning to have lessons in that room at 9 a. m. according to the schedule, luckily the c