the united states is very , and mexicor mexico is very important for the united states. share the border, the biggest in the world, which on a daily basis more than one million , and trade between our two countries surpasses $500 billion. , therms of security cooperation between the two governments is increasingly more .mportant i just had a very open conversation with mr. trump, and the main goal of our meeting was to know each other, to exchange point of view, and discuss our relationship. , we share thee benefitednafta has not only the united states, but also mexico. u.s. exports to mexico are close to $200 billion a year, figures of the trade chamber of the united states. country buys more from the united states than germany, , japan, and the u.k. altogether. and we have developed a very competitive manufacturing plant .etween the two countries as partners, we have to work .ogether nevertheless, free trade agreements between the united states, mexico, and canada can be improved. the new government of the united -- i don't find believe that trade between the two count

for the united states. good play by lee. >> rouzier through a seam in the block and down. >> a lot of jump floats from france right now. tight set. taylor sander off the top. what a swing by matt anderson. wow. talk about taking out the watching the transition block of france and with kevin le roux out there i would go set to middle. i would exploit that matchup in transition. le roux is taking off way early. >> easy serve again gobbled up. over the top and ripped. the united states serving has americans to get out of this match with a win in four. save that point in case you end up in a tie situation. you want to have maximum points on your side. three points for a win in three or four. two for a win in five. >> ngapeth with a serve into the net. we don't like the system. it's fine for a long club professional season over 30 or 40 matches but not in a tournament. it is what it is. it's the same for all the teams. 16-15. the united states got to get back on track serving. france has been superb receiving si

that gives -- it that gives the united states power to exert control over actions. to combine chinese government. one of my interviewees describe that u.s. appreciation for new president, new taiwan president is a promise to maintain the status quo in cross states reels. but he or she also mention to the livelihood of washington immediately asserting itself should have that status quo means as taiwan independence. and it is true in my view these kind of a view reestablish taiwan's status after small power to be used as part of americans great. and not as an equal. the last part of the whole story is the potential of u.s. policymakers to take harsher actions to what had taiwan should do so will prevent further damage to u.s.-china relationship. ... effect u.s. relationships because the united states wants to make better relationship with china, with china. in summary, i think it would be dangerous for decision-makers in tapei to miss jobs. and i think it is in the best interest for taiwan to maintain autonomy by not claiming dependence upon any greater power and maint

i think it's in the best interest of the united states, and the world as a whole that the united states negotiate rather than go back to the cold war relationship with the soviet union. i don't look at the picture as bleakly as you have indicated in your question, mr. trewhitt. i believe that the united states had many successes in recent years, in recent months, as far as the communist movement is concerned. we have been successful in portugal, where a year ago it looked like there was a very great possibility that the communists would take over in portugal. it didn't happen. we have a democracy in portugal today. a few months ago, or i should say, maybe two years ago, the soviet union looked like they had continued strength in the middle east. today, according to prime minister rabin, the soviet union is weaker in the middle east than they have been in many, many years. the facts are the soviet union relationship with egypt is at a low level. the soviet union relationship with syria is at a very low point. the united states today, according to prime minister rabin of israel, is at a p

next november 8th, the united states people will elect a new president of the united states. i am sure the electoral process will continue being intense debate. all of these characteristics of the grand democratic tradition of the u.s. hillary clinton as well as mr. donald trump have publicly expressed my respect. it has been with the president and friend barack obama, the next president of north america will find in mexico and it's government a neighbor that wants to work constructively to strengthen even more the relationship among our nations and to confront, together, all of the challenges that we face in common. we, i belief there is great opportunity for both countries if we decide to take advantage of this as good friends, allies, and strategic allies beginning from a relationship based in mutual respect. even though we may not agree on everything, i trust that together, we will be able to find better prosperity and security without losing sight of security and independence are the most important of everything we value. any close relationship needs to be visits and ren

the united states is highly important to mexico, just as mexico is highly important for the united states. we share the border where there's greater traffic of persons where every day in illegal fashion over one million persons cross the border and over 400,000 vehicles. trade between our countries goes over $500 billion per year. we innovate and together we manufacture, and in early iterm national security, the daily cooperation between our government is more important as time goes by in order to face the challenges in a complex world. mr. trump and i had an open and constructive discussion. the purpose of our meeting was to get to know each other and to exchange ideas and visions about bilateral relationships of our countries. in terms of trade, mr. trump and i talked about my condition that free trade agreement of north america has benefitted both the united states and mexico. exports from the united states to mexico are close to $200 billion per year and according to the chamber of commerce of the united states, more than 6 million of american jobs depend on experorts to mexico. our c

united states of america. i am absolutely certain that the electoral process will be one with intense debate and many ideas and a full citizen participation which are all the characteristics of the great democratic tradition of the united states of america. both hillary clinton and mr. donald trump have publicly expressed their respect towards me. as the president barack obama has said, the next president of the united states will find in mexico and in its government a neighbor that wishes to work in a constructive way in order to strengthen and increase the relationship between our nations, bonds of our countries and to face our common challenges. if we decide to look at our opportunities together as friends, as good neighbors and as strategic allies based on a relationship which is founded on mutual respect, although we do not agree on everything, we trust that together we'll be able to find greater prosperity without losing sight of the fact that liberty and independence are the grounds for everything we do

i expressed that to the united states and that of the united states that we must take action to stem this tremendous outflow of jobs from our country. it's happening every day, it's getting worse and worse and worse, and we have to stop it. prosperity and happiness in both of our countries will increase if we work together on the following five shared goals: number one, ending illegal immigration, not just between our countries, but including the illegal immigration and migration from central and south americans and other regions that impact security and finances in both mexico and the united states. this is a humanitarian disaster. the dangerous treks, the abuse by gangs and cartels, and the extreme physical dangers, and it must be solved, it must be solved quickly. not fair to the people anywhere worldwide, you can truly say, but certainly not fair to the people of mexico or the people of the united states. number two, having a secure border is a sovereign right, and mutually beneficial. we recognize and respect the right of either country to build a physical barrier or wall on any

>> us. >> yes, the united states. if you paranoid and suspicious, it's the united states. so if you are joseph stalin, you have to respond. the cold war is like a tennis match. it goes from one court to the other. we do something, the soviet union does something. we respond, they respond. here is stalin's response. he is going to tighten up control over countries in eastern europe. hungary and czechoslovakia i mentioned here specifically because those were two countries that were supposed to have free elections after world war ii is over. well, the free elections go out the window by 1948. the communists have a purge of leadership and the two countries will be puppet regimes of the soviet union and then berlin. it gets complicated now. just keep in mind that during world war ii at the very end you've got the russian, the soviet army is driving deep into germany. they're going to get to berlin before we do. they're going to occupy much of eastern germany with their army, with their forces. berlin is a very important city in german history and culture and government and poli

the united states and mexico share a 2,000-mile border, a half trillion dollars in annual trade, and 1 million legal border crossings each and every day. we are united by our support for democracy, a great love for our people, and the contributions of millions of mexican-americans to the united states. and i happen to have a tremendous feeling for mexican-americans, not only in terms of friendships, but in terms of the tremendous numbers that i employ in the united states, and they are amazing people, amazing people. i have many friends, so many friends and so many friends coming to mexico and in mexico. i'm proud to say how many people i employ. and the united states first, second, and third generation mexicans are just beyond reproach, spectacular, hard-working people. i have such great respect for them and their strong values of family, faith, and community. we all share a common interest in keeping our hemisphere safe, prospero processro prosperous and free. no one wins in either country when human smugglers and drug traffickers prey on innocent people, when cartels commit acts of

it should be unacceptable to the united states, right. what the arab states are going to have to accept some day, let's say we can change iranian behavior so that they no longer want to dominate the region, let's say we can get to that point. iran is still going to be a powerful regional player because of its size, because of its economy, because of its western-- the western orientation of many of its people. i mean many, many iranians admire the united states. it is going to be a significant player. those sunni states are going to have to accept that kind of iran. >> rose: do they recognize that? >> i don't know. i don't know. but there is a fundamental difference between the two for me. >> back to the question, great question. so, so modern-- modern islamics-- islamic extremism began in 1979. and it began in 1979 in two places. it began in tehran with the takeover of the united states embassy, by a bunch of student thugs. and it also began at the very same time in saudi arabia with the takeover of the grand mosque by a bunch of terrorist

on the united states four days after pearl harbor, the united states took over the direction of world war ii. and reading winston churchill's memoirs, you would never believe it. i think in terms of history and histy yokingty -- his tier yoking my, the fact that winston churchill won the nobel prize was a great thing for literature but, as i say, not for history. and in this fdr trilogy, i am doing my best to change history, if by history we understand the way we look at the past and the way we interpret the past. the first volume, "the mantle of command," covered fdr in the first year of the war after pearl harbor, up to the moment when american troops finally went into, on to the offensive and landed in north africa in operation torch. and this second volume takes the story up several months later when the president of the united states becomes the first president in american history to fly while in office, flying across the atlantic to north africa, and the first president to inspect american troops in war abroad. he flies to north africa at the beginning of this book not only to m

it becomes the conflict between spain and the united states or the united states and seminoles. this makes sense. the seminole war and who the seminoles are fighting, just blurt it out. stand up. come to the mike. who are the seminoles going to fight if it's a seminole war? is it obvious? who are the seminoles going to fight? all right. someone can say the u.s. right? that seems to be straight forward. indeed, the great hero of the seminole war from the united states' point of view is andrew jackson. we have a problem with this. somehow context is missing. when we look at the record of the first seminole war we see very little written about seminoles themselves. we hear a lot of things we've heard before in this class. we've heard lots about red sticks, lots about creeks. we hear william mcintosh's name over and over and over. we hear benjamin hawkins. we hear andrew jackson. for some reason we don't hear seminole very often. instead we get phrases like this. chief mcintosh and his brigade. brigade. not his unit or his band, brigade. implying size. hundreds of creek warriors eng

finay atuff block for the unit states. >> talked toevin earlier. >> easy servingight now for the united states. good pla by lee. >> rouzier through a seam in the blk and do. >> a lot ofum floats from france rig now. tit set. taylor sder off the p. what a swingy matt derson. wow. talk about taking o the >> i'm watching this and watching the transition blo of france a with vin le roux out there i would go set to middle. would exploit tha matchup in transition. leoux is takg o way early. eas serve ain gobbled up. over the top and ripped. e united stas serng has americs toet out o thi match wh a winn four sa thatointn ce you end up in a tiesituation. u wanto haveaxum points onoursi. three points for a win i three or fo. two for a win in fi. >> ngapeth with a serve io the net. we don't lik the system. it's fine for a lonlub pressional season over 30 or 40atches b not in a tourment. it is what it is. it's the same for all the tes. 16-15. e united states got toet ba on track rvg. franceas been superb receiving nce the firstset. back t uzier. down the line again. >> with the delivery. ge pssure

>> us. >> yes, the united states. if you paranoid and suspicious, it's the united states. so if you are joseph stalin, you have to respond. the cold war is like a tennis match. it goes from one court to the other. we do something, the soviet union does something. we respond, they respond. here is stalin's response. he is going to tighten up control over countries in eastern europe. hungary and czechoslovakia i mentioned here specifically because those were two countries that were supposed to have free elections after world war ii is over. well, the free elections go out the window by 1948. the communists have a purge of leadership and the two countries will be puppet regimes of the soviet union and then berlin. it gets complicated now. just keep in mind that during world war ii at the very end you've got the russian, the soviet army is driving deep into germany. they're going to get to berlin before we do. they're going to occupy much of eastern germany with their army, with their forces. berlin is a very important city in german history and culture and government and poli

even though the united states has accepted a great number of refugees before that moment in time. and in fact, the law is catching up to the interesting set of political practices by the state department and other actors. the refugee law in 1980 defines it as follows -- a refugee is a person fearful of being persecuted for reasons of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion. they are existing outside the country of his or her nationality and unavailable to avail himself or herself of the protection of that country. in effect, refugees are stateless actors who are absent the protection of a government and they're being persecuted by their home state for the following reasons. it's a very broad definition. in 1980 when the united states adopts this, we'll come back to this at the end of the lecture, they are really adopting for the first time in 1980 an international united nations definition of who a refugee is for the first time. this is what's interesting about this story is that in some respects the story of u.s. refugee generosity

it should be unacceptable to the united states. r states are going to have to except sunday -- let's say we can change iranian behavior so they no longer want to dominate the region. let's say we can get to that point. iran is still going to be a powerful regional player because of its size, its economy, because of the western orientation of many of its people. many iranians admire the united states. it is going to be a significant player. those suni states are going to have to accept that kind of iran. there is a fundamental difference between the two. back to the question, great question. islamicrn -- modern extremism again in 1979, and it began in 1979 in twi places. -- two places. an began in toronto -- terh with the takeover of the united states embassy by two thugs. and the takeover of the grand mosque by a bunch of terrorists. view,n extremist point of both of those were successful. so, in iran, the result was the strengthening of the ayatollah at the expense of the new secular government. actually, the central overthrow of t

into the 32 states states as well as the federal district of mexico city since mexico, like the united states, is a is a federal state. finally building stronger communities along the northern front frontier with united states. the truth is, the mexican economy is what drives that. when the economy economy is going well, the communities are better. when the economy is down, the communities are less strong. that's taking the four things that we described as our initiatives and giving them a report card. where are we across the board? first, the realities are changing. we are dealing today more with transnational organized crime. when we started we were focused on largely cocaine and to a lesser extent heroin. we have to adjust to reflect that reality. second we were dealing with a different mexican government. that government left office at the end of 2012 and the not so new government has a right to determine their own priorities protecting we are making progress but we have to continue to work that. at at the end of the day, my assessment is we are substantially better in our bilateral relat

family reunification, he agreed with emmanuel seller that the small amount of asians already in the united states were likely to take advantage of them, with the result being, quote, the general pattern that exists today would continue for many years to come. secretary of state dean rusk, involved in this bill for a long period of time, commented, any increase in the volume of immigration resulting from the inflow would be rather limited against the actual volume of asian immigration into the united states between 1953 and 1963. so what do we make of these? maybe these were evasions designed to get a bill passed. i am not from washington, d.c. many of you are. does anyone ever say anything less than the full truth when they're trying to get a bill passed? [laughter] >> is that legal? can they do that? so, that is a possibility. maybe these were honest predictions that turned out to be wrong without being essential assumptions without which the bill would not have passed. what i want to say is that in the context -- i want to propose that in the context of the bill, in the context of the discussio

public opinion in the united states, in the united states congress, in the united states press and also in europe. by 1913 and certainly by 1916 europe had seeded any rejection of american hegemony north of the amazon. the war in europe expanded the opportunity for the united states to tighten its hegemony and also made the united states even more -- the u.s. government -- even more eager to assert, to establish stability in the region. when there was so much turmoil in europe it became even more desirable to try to impose what americans considered stable government in the countries of central america and the caribbean. when the election of 1916 occurred and wilson said that he wanted to keep the united states out of war of course there were u.s. troops in haiti, in the dominican republic and nicaragua. the united states didn't need to intervene in every country in the caribbean and central america. in a way it is a little bit like lynching. you don't need to lynch everybody. you lynch some people and that is the lesson that people learn. it is very possible to intimidate. in 1918-1919

for the united states. good play by lee. >> rouzier through a seam in the block and down. >> a lot of jump floats from france right now. tight set. taylor sander off the top. what a swing by matt anderson. wow. talk about taking out >> i'm watching this and watching the transition block of france and with kevin le roux out there i would go set to middle. i would exploit that matchup in transition. le roux is taking off way early. >> easy serve again gobbled up. over the top and ripped. the united states serving has americans to get out of this match with a win in four. save that point in case you end up in a tie situation. you want to have maximum points on your side. three points for a win in three or four. two for a win in five. >> ngapeth with a serve into the net. we don't like the system. it's fine for a long club professional season over 30 or 40 matches but not in a tournament. it is what it is. it's the same for all the teams. 16-15. the united states got to get back on track serving. france has bee

for the united states. good play by lee. >> rouzier through a seam in the block and down. >> a lot of jump floats from france right now. tight set. taylor sander off the top. what a swing by matt anderson. wow. talk about taking out the trash. >> i'm watching t watching the transition block of france and with kevin le roux out there i would go set to middle. i would exploit that matchup in transition. le roux is taking off way early. >> easy serve again gobbled up. over the top and ripped. the united states serving has really dropped. >> hugely important for match with a win in four. save that point in case you end up in a tie situation. you want to have maximum points on your side. three points for a win in three or four. two for a win in five. >> ngapeth with a serve into the net. we don't like the system. it's fine for a long club professional season over 30 or 40 matches but not in a tournament. it is what it is. it's the same for all the teams. 16-15. thit france has been superb receiving since the fir

the united states and mexico share a 2,000-mile border, a half a trillion dollars in annual trade andillion legal border crossings each and every day. we are united by our support for democracy, a great love for our people, and the contributions of millions of mexican americans to the united states. and i happen to have a tremendous feeling for mexican-americans, not only in terms of friendships but in terms of the tremendous numbers that i employ in the united states and they are amazing people. amazing people. i have many friends, so many friends and so many friends coming to mexico and in mexico. i'm proud to say how many people i employ. and the united states, first, second, and third generation mexicans are just beyond reproach, spectacular, spectacular, hard-working people. i have such great respect for them and their strong values of family, faith, and community. we all share a common interest in keeping our hemisphere safe, prosperous, and free. no one wins in either country when human smugglers and drug traffickers prey on innocent people, when cartels commit acts of violence

are thrilled to have you here in the united states. ladies and gentlemen come is my pleasure to introduce client honored guest, prime minister leash and limb of singapore. from our first meeting two years ago, to that conversation we share just shortly before we came into this room, it is clear to me that prime minister lee and i both agree that the united states and singapore's economic partnership is indispensable. i knowme minister and that are strong commercial relationship have helped promote security and stability across southeast asia. that are deep trade and investment ties have helped deliver prosperity and opportunity for both our people. and that greater u.s. engagement in southeast asia is good for the united states, good for the people of singapore and good for countries across the entire region. see the pleased to prime minister's wife here with us this evening. among other things, she is ceo world-class business leader who i have great admiration for. be a fellowpens to stanford graduate which never hurts. ourndly rememb

that is perceived -- from the united states. that is perceived among think tanks from scholars in d.c.. mr. romberg: any more questions? please. >> we have been focused almost entirely on east asia, but today the news is about a terrorist bombing -- bombing of a chinese embassy. ended,e cold war expected that the united states would involve in a war in for years? extending that is where we are. are we looking in the wrong 's future china security threats? hung-jen wang: thank you very much. it is another tough question. think thetent i answer is yes. strategy, this. selfof -- we call this a prophecy theory -- i mean, the post. is what you better result of because of your better policy -- the strategy from the united states. is very impolite to say so, but i think it is wrong in terms of -- too many people, who have these bad memories about policies, especially those people in asia, they have these entertainment -- education systems -- is better memories about world war ii, the chin thisty, interfering in intervening in domestic

for the united states. good play by lee. >> rouzier through a seam in the block and down. >> a lot of jump floats from france right now. tight set. taylor sander off the top. what a swing by matt anderson. wow. talk about taking out the trash. >> i'm watching the transition block of france and with kevin le roux out there i would go set to middle. i would exploit that matchup in transition. le roux is taking off way early. >> easy serve again gobbled up. over the top and ripped. the united states serving has really dropped. match with a win in four. save that point in case you end up in a tie situation. you want to have maximum points on your side. three points for a win in three or four. two for a win in five. >> ngapeth with a serve into the net. we don't like the system. it's fine for a long club professional season over 30 or 40 matches but not in a tournament. it is what it is. it's the same for all the teams. back on track serving. france has been superb receiving since the first set. back to rouzier.

now for the united states. good play by lee. >> rouzier through a seam in the block and down. we're tied again. >> a lot of jump floats from france right now. tight set. taylor sander off the top. what a swing by matt anderson. wow. talk about taking out the trash. >> i'm watching this and watching the transition block of france and with kevin le roux out there i would go set to middle. i would exploit that matchup in transition. le roux is taking off way early. >> easy serve again gobbled up. over the top and ripped. the united states serving has really dropped. >> hugely important for americans to get out of this match with a win in four. save that point in case you end up in a tie situation. you want to have maximum points on your side. three points for a win in three or four. two for a win in five. >> ngapeth with a serve into the net. we don't like the system. it's fine for a long club professional season over 30 or 40 matches but not in a tournament. it is what it is. it's the same for all the teams. 16-1

what should the united states do? at a public level, we should recognize and state that however appropriate, that taiwan remains a critical political and military asset to the united states. a democratic taiwan is proof to all ethnic chinese that political and economic freedoms could coexist. yes, this does undermine the legitimacy of the chinese communist party. it is probably the only real lever that the united states has to help chinese themselves decide that they deserve a better political system. we should also recognize that taiwan remains the capstone of the island chain. if you lose that, the chain is divided. america's allies are divided. and china can intimidate and isolate them much more readily. secondly, we should state that china's accelerating military threats to taiwan trigger policy causes to the policy track. their techniques make clear that the diplomatic relationship with china is based on peaceful resolutions of relations with taiwan. this is not happening. i'm not saying that we need to reverse t

politics" they write this book is about race as much as it is immigration it is changing in the united states but there frequently noticed through a lens of race. the images are that of latino immigrants. marisa abrajano is an associate professor from the university of california san diego. also a senior fellow at the brookings institution. for research interest of the areas of latino politics political participation and the mass media campaign she is the author of campaigning the new american electorate of new faces and new voices. please welcome to san antonio doctor marisa abrajano. [applause] >> thanks for that kind introduction and thanks for coming. i just want to talk about the goal of the book as well as the main research question then so eloquently stated it is a central part of the united states via often thought about as a country of immigrants and today more than never it plays a messalians role of american politics. en demographically to make up 12% of the population and comes racial change that latinos surpass blacks the largest in the united states making a 17 part --% of the p

now for the united states. good play by lee. >> rouzier through a seam in the block and down. we're tied again. >> a lot of jump floats from france right now. tight set. taylor sander off the top. what a swing by matt anderson. wow. talk about taking out the trash. >> i'm watching this and watching the transition block of france and with kevin le roux out there i would go set to middle. i would exploit that matchup in transition. le roux is taking off way early. >> easy serve again gobbled up. over the top and ripped. the united states serving has really dropped. >> hugely important for americans to get out of this match with a win in four. save that point in case you end up in a tie situation. you want to have maximum points on your side. three points for a win in three or four. two for a win in five. >> ngapeth with a serve into the net. we don't like the system. it's fine for a long club professional season over 30 or 40 matches but not in a tournament. it is what it is. it's the same for all the teams. 16-1

turkey has hit back at the united states over recent criticism of its ongoing role in the conflict in syria. tuesday the u.s. asked turkey to focus its efforts on the islamic state region and not the kurdish. friday, turkey said that's unacceptable. how tense are things at the moment between washington and ankara? >> i think first i better set up straight lest i be a target of north korea! [laughter] >> not quite there yet. >> things are tense. it's almost a circular firing squad. here you have russia supporting the syrian government of asat. the united states is supporting the rebels against assad and russia. turkey has come in and is waging an effective campaign on behalf of the syrian rebels, going into syria itself but as its going into syria itself fighting against isil or isis, they're also attacking the kurdish militia that we're supporting. so in effect for turkey, the enemy of my enemy is still my enemy. so they look at the enemy, isil, but the kurdish mitt -- militia, the y.p.g. is also considered an enemy as far as the turk are concerned. so we have a situation in which the

for the united states accompanied by the prime minister of singapore. [applause] sec. kerry: thank you very much. please come everybody, please take your seats. welcome to the state department, mr. prime minister and mrs. lee and mr. vice president, dr. biden, my counterpart, foreign minister and distinguished guests. we are really delighted to welcome you here this afternoon. your excellency, we have been very, very much well looking forward to welcoming you here. i am personally pleased for the chance to repay you for the many visits i have made to your beautiful country in the warm hospitality i have continued to receive. in particular, last year where we had a chance to visit. as the president said repeatedly in both private conversation and public, singapore may be a small country, but it is a small country with an extraordinarily large impact on its region and in the even on the world. your leadership, mr. prime minister over the last years has contributed very significantly to a model of good governance, andconomic united is an intercultural harmo

could come to the united states with absolutely no numerical limitation. there were other kinds of economic and health restrictions, but no numerical limitation of qualified immigrants. however, to prevent the immigration of asians, there was a special asian racial attribution rule that all people of asian racial ancestry, wherever born, wherever they were a citizen, were charged to the quota of their racial homeland. the way these rules worked together was that if we had a native citizen and resident of brazil who was of german ancestry, that person was treated as a brazilian, and like all other brazilians could come to the united states without numerical limitation before 1965. if we had a native citizen and resident of brazil who is of japanese ancestry, that person was treated as japanese and could come to the united states if and only if one of the 100 visas allocated to japan every year happened to be available. robert kennedy was saying that elimination of this racial attribution rule would mean that some people of western hemisphere citizenship but

mike: and in the united states. was asked, charlie, i was asked by an australian think tank, they came to me and said, you know, you have analyzed the politics of or countries for 30 years, would you analyze your own and write something for us and i did. and in this piece i wrote, which was published a couple of weeks ago, i said there are three big dynamics here in the united states. one is what i call income insecurity. there has been a whole bunch of people left behind by globalization and technology. charlie: they are attracted to the candidacy of donald trump. mike: bernie sanders said i will fix it with income distribution and donald trump who says i will fix it. charlie: or all about trade. mike: and carry out trade deals and tell ford motor company you can't move to mexico. how do you do that? that's one. second, right, is a belief -- and that first one is not a small percentage of the population, because real incomes for american house holed for the majority has been going down. so this is real. this is a f

the united states and mexico share 2,000-mile border. rillion dollars in annual trade and 1 million legal border crossings each and everyday. we are united by our support for democracy, a great love for our people, and a contributions of millions of mexican/americans to the united states. and i happen to have a tremendous feeling for mexican americans. not only in terms of friendships but in terms of the tremendous numbers that i employ in the united states. and they are amazing people. amazing people. i have many friends, so many friend, so many friends coming into mexico. i'm proud to say how many people i employ and the united states first, second and third generation mexicans are just beyond reproach. spectacular, spectacular hardworking people. i have such great respect for them and their strong values of family, faith and community. we all share a common interest in keeping our hemisphere safe, prosperous and free. no one wins in either country when human smugglers and drug traffickers prey on innocent people. when cartels continue

for the united states. good play by lee. >> rouzier through a seam in the block and down. >> a lot of jump floats from france right now. tight set. taylor sander off the top. what a swing by matt anderson. wow. talk about taking >> i'm watching this and watching the transition block of france and with kevin le roux out there i would go set to middle. i would exploit that matchup in transition. le roux is taking off way early. >> easy serve again gobbled up. over the top and ripped. the united states serving has >> hugely important for americans to get out of this match with a win in four. save that point in case you end up in a tie situation. you want to have maximum points on your side. three points for a win in three or four. two for a win in five. >> ngapeth with a serve into the net. we don't like the system. it's fine for a long club professional season over 30 or 40 matches but not in a tournament. it is what it is. it's the same for all the s. 16-15. the united states got to get back on track serving

the strategies being employed in tokyo, beijing right now at the expense of the united states were originally invented 400 years ago in renaissance italy among the italian city states of northern italy, places like venice and florence. they were the commercial powers of the day. those guys were very smart, given the limited economic resources at the time. they were the commercial powers of the day. those guys were very smart given the limited economic resources at the time. mercantilism is a very, very old game. the founding fathers knew about it, and that is what is being played against the united states right now. luckily we have the heritage, we have the understanding, and we certainly have the economics to know what to do about it. there is a myth out there that somehow economics has proved that free-trade is the best policy. now, one of the things i've learned in the course of writing my book "free trade does not work," -- in fact the major reason i wrote it, was simply to convey to a mass audience that when you think economics has proved that free-trade is always best, that is not econo

when pennsylvania became part of the united states, i became a citizen of the united states. i did so by choice. it has been commented upon by those who choose their religion in adulthood, that they often adhere to that more vastly than those who are born to it. the same could be said of immigrants. because their choice was a conscious decision, irrespective of the source of their departure from their original land, whether it was persecution, religion, or political opinion, or in search of economic betterment, it does not make a difference. adherence to a philosophy found here, that is what sets us apart. maybe more steadfast than for those who are nativeborn. his excellency, general washington spoke in his first state of the union in january of 1790, addressing the matter of immigration, he asked congress to adopt procedures to transform foreigners into citizens. his excellency understood the need to integrate thousands of citizens that came yearly into our body and country. yet in the debate of naturalization, there were disagreements on whether we should allow a free flow

gulen, since the individual bits in the united states -- the individual that has been in the united states is opposite the subject of some concern that has been expressed, to put it mildly, by the turkish government, vice president biden will come if asked, will say to his counterpart for president obama has indicated directly to president erdogan, which is a that there is a treaty, and extradition treaty that's been on the books between the states and turkey for more than 30 years. the united states is committed to following the procedure and guidelines that are outlined in that treaty. and you've already seen extensive coordination between officials at the department of justice and their turkish counterparts. i understand some department of justice officials are traveling to turkey this week to meet with her counterparts to review some of the materials that have been produced by turkish officials. but openly this decision about extradition, it's not a presidential decision. there is a process that is codified in that treaty and in u.s. law that will follow. and that's what is department

singapore air force pilots train in the united states and u.s. combat ships rotate through singapore. as a result of the strong political, economic and defense ties, singapore has served as an anchor for the united states pivot to asia. now it's my honor to introduce the president and c.e.o. of the u.s. chamber of commerce mr. tom donahue. tom has led the chamber almost 20 years and as a result of his leadership the chamber has played a dominant role in defending and promoting free enterprise and free trade in the united states and beyond. tom, thank you for all you've done to advance american business interests and thank you for your partnership tonight. mr. donahue: thank you very much. good evening everyone and welcome to the u.s. chamber of commerce. i'd like to join alex in they thanking all of you for being here and thanking our sponsors this evening. your support in every way for this meeting and this relationship is very important. we gather to celebrate the friendship between the united states and singapore and our robust commercial part

to about the united states involvement in it. think the fact that we were probably a couple of hours too late to the game for those conspiracies. the we areiven dynamically have with turkey -- blaise: given this weird dynamic turkey, and democracy had been eroding for at least the past three years and has eroded significantly in the aftermath of the coup, talking about tens of thousands of orple who have been detained fired who presumably could have had no direct involvement in the coup, how do you balance this on the one hand support the turkish government because they are democratically elected and on the other hand, try to push them to rein in their authoritarian? alan: it is a difficult balance. there is no doubt. we do not know how many of these people are guilty and we really do not know anything at his point. we know what the accusations are. i think we caught people by surprise here is the fact that so many tens of thousands of civil servants, including judges and press hitters and police, were so rapidly rounded up and f

i have worked with a president of the united states. served with hundreds of .enators only 13 of surface long as i have. doesn't secretary -- dozens of state and i can , no majort hesitation history inee in the america,d states of don't year, just listen, has less or been less prepared to deal with national security. what absolutely amazes me is he does not seem to want to learn it. not want to seem that she does not seem to want to it.n to think itseem matters. this man is totally and thoroughly unqualified to be president of the united states of america. [applause] -- lacks theikes temperament -- i would feel better if that is all he lacked. every issue that matters most to trump hasty, donald no clue what it takes to leave this great country. now look, if i had said this ago, you10 months would say i am being partisan. i am partisan. i am not mean about it. i do not know any more democrat that has a more positive republicans with and i do in the united states senate. but having said that, look at the people that come out. scores and s

, puerto rico is in the united states. sorry mr. president. the reason is there are are american citizens having a terrible time right now. they are in the middle of an outbreak that is going to be or already is bad and is going to be a serious situation because what happened with them in 2014 is that 25% of the population got infected. if you look at the potential importation so here's the quick of the problem. there are 200 plus million who journey back and forth from united states to areas of local transmission of zika. which means in this is something people are starting to appreciate now, the difference between a travel related case and a local traveling case in the united states there are at least 2500. there are probably closer to 10,000 because 2500 recognized cases of travel related, mainly someone who is infected elsewhere and either comes back to the night states or travels to the united states. so if there are those many people in areas where there are mosquitoes that can transmit it, it's not surprising that y