williams, united states navy. [bell] major duane williams, united states army.petty officer marvin roger woods, united states navy, retired. [bell] captain john d. yemnicki senior, united states navy, retired. [bell] vicki yancy. [bell] petty officer second class kevin w. yokum, united states navy. [bell] chief petty officer donald m. young, united states navy. [bell] edmund g. young junior. [bell] lisa l. young. [bell] shu yen yung. [bell] and her husband. [bell] >> ♪ amazing grace how sweet the sound that saved a wretch like me i once was lost but now i am found twas blind but now i see >> ♪ amazing grace amazing grace amazing grace the lord hath promised good to me, his word my hope secures; he will my shield and portion be as long as life endures. when we've been there ten thousand years, bright shining as the sun, we've no less days to sing god's praise >> ♪ amazing grace >> ♪ the lord hath promised good to me, his word my hope secures; he will my shield and portion be as long as life endures. ♪ >> ♪ amazing grace amazing grace ♪ ♪ >> ladies and gentlemen,

the united states.stados unidos se presenta a sí mismo como el garante de los derechos humanos, del respeto al derecho internacional, the united states presents itself as the guarantee of human rights of respect for international. law of customs of relations between countries, however, this standard bearer of democracy, democracy that seems to be kind of ointment, sad that heals everything, presents its own democracy before the eyes of the world, however, in practice, its actions show us that this country, which is nothing but empire, does things that are completely against the principles it proclaims. to talk about this behavior of the united states, we are today with jose partiera, we're with him from the united states. he's a cuban lawyer, specialist in migration and human rights issues. he was the defender, this is very important, of the five cubans unjustly in the united states. predict all these principles, according to your knowledge, how do you describe this phenomenon? well, first of all, is it

maybe because in the united states , there are enough of them on the continental part of the united states of them, according to some data, even hundreds, well, let's say dozens, because we do not know the actual technical combat condition of these machines, of course they are not all new there, from the time it is possible even of the cold war, but they can be restored, it could already be restored, after all, no no... the first day will come, and the united states could hand over to ukraine 25, for example, patriot complexes, which would, in principle, block the main ee ukrainian objects and territories, and if we transferred even more, then we could safely ensure virtually guaranteed protection of ukrainian territory, with a high probability, protection of ukrainian territory from russian ballistic missiles and not only. unfortunately, explain to me logically which ones to find. arguments why the united states ignores transfers to ukraine of the patriot system, which the armed forces of the united states do not need at all, i just emphasize, they are located on the continental part of t

the president of the united states.d like to share with you and the people of the world my thoughts a subject of great importance to the cause of peace. relations between the united states and the soviet union, protests against his war-mongering policies didn't let him keep playing his previous role for a long time. in order to put an end to all that, the soviet authorities were urged to help those people come to power who could negotiate with reagan and dissuade him from following that strategy. pipes had predicted that the next leader would be a reformist. thatcher had chosen gorbacev and had shared her idea with reagan. after chernenko's death, all the predictions came true. now it was time for the third stage of the strategy. after gorbachev took office, the noise blocking devices were no longer needed, because there was no more static. everything was changing very fast. not only the radio stations were doing what reagan wanted, but also many newspapers, some of which took money from the united states were doing the

of america more than netanyahu wants a regional war, trust me on this, it's not the united states doesn't want war, no, biden wants more before he leaves, he wants to engage because he want to sustain the united states of america control of the region, they don't want to be bleeded out bit by bit in this war of attrrion, in the the which is happening in west age and in ukraine as well, and the united states of america will start slow. losing power, they want to direct massive blows in the region right now, the americans want and that's why they pushing netanyahu to rick havick in in the region, but seeing saying that the resistance itself, the palestinian one is directing massive blows of the israeli army, and the same thing in lebanon, and the the the the attack of all, which is the response of hizballah against the... end of killing his commander uh ali shukr uh which is hit unit 8200 and it killed its own the leader of that unit now this news were saying a week ago the guy is missing the guys may be going to resign but today there is news of he's been killed assassinated in tha

this was announced by the president of the united states of america, joseph biden. let's listen. we publish a joint declaration. on supporting the recovery and reconstruction of ukraine, to clearly state that we will support ukraine now and in the future. everything will start from the battlefield. i am determined to provide ukraine has what it needs to win and fight for survival. tomorrow i will announce a series of actions to accelerate support for the ukrainian military. but we know that the future victory of ukraine is something more. than what happens on the battlefield. it is also about what ukrainians are doing to make the most of their free and independent future. zelensky spoke before the un security council and the un general assembly and said that western countries should force the aggressor country russia to make peace. the press secretary of the kremlin dmytro piskov immediately stated that neither russia nor russia can supposedly be forced to make peace, well, zelensky spoke quite carefully and diplomatically in the un general assembly and at the security council as

out because polls in the united states show most americans in the united states favour a palestinian state. i mean, clear now that your uh full, my boss is only option is to join the united states in to this conflict and they run, i don't bicycle have not been biding since the israeli assassination of as well. any a and the, or what, what does israel going to do when the united states, the, whether it be this generational, the next is good by israel. we have israel because of what israel does as regards human rights violations. we are quite capable of defending ourselves by ourselves. lay. ready sorry to jump so quickly, but you're not value because that's why the americans are giving you tens of billions or hundreds of millions of dollars weapons without the united states. you are you, you don't have a country. i don't think so. if you look at the united states, the defense 8 to nature, to south korea, to japan, each 100 times what the are doing with is with, with these rights more security corporation, they enjoy our technology, their enjoy, our strategic and tactical that i didn't

out because polls in the united states, most americans in the united states favour a palestinian state. i mean, clear now that your uh, full, my boss is only option is to join the united states in to this conflict and iran and not biting of not being biting since the israeli assassination of as well. any a and the what, what is this real going to do when the united states? the, whether it be this generation or the next is good by israel. we hate israel because of what israel does is regards human rights violations. we are quite capable of defending ourselves by ourselves. lay. ready sorry to jump so quickly, but you're not value because that's why the americans are giving you tens of billions or hundreds of millions of dollars weapons without the united states. you are, you don't have a country. i don't think so. if you look at the united states, the defense age, to nature, to south korea, to japan, it's 100 times where the are doing with his with, with this right? small rock security corporation, they enjoy our technology. they're enjoy our strategic and tactical lead. um, i would say

it's because of the united states, and why is the united states doing this? what it's for jew political reasons is writers on our lives united states and is ready to be continued to dictate that relationship with the united states to the by that research that has committed itself on the very beginning that i think these assignments administration, that it was started on condition that he behind was read, it was, she did it for apartment, it were finances. and if there's looking at that question, is there a kind of sign at least this year? but secondly, before that, and you political terms and terms, all, it's going to put the world power to stand the regional powers on notice restaurant . you want to try and i have to pay attention that the united states will support is or through the end, whether it's general side, whether it is mass that or against the news, whether it's best, wireless is human rights in the west, then the united states will continue to stand behind this highlight. so china is on put on notice in the question of taiwan. you queen, of course

there is a danger that the united states has placed weapons on satellites after all.n be of any type, up to and including tungsten pins. you just have to launch it in the right direction, then it gains hypersonic speed under the influence of gravity. and when it collides with the planet's surface, a lot of energy will be released. this is a serious weapon. and a tungsten pin fly by right into putin's head, how tempting such a prospect is, yes, we can't live with such dreams. so, what do we have in the end, how do people react to it, and what do they think about it? well, they react to it in the same way as they reacted to all the previous ones, because i repeat once again, nothing new, all this has already been heard 100 million times, and the fact that somewhere in some wallet in russia there is something on... there is nothing critical changes, moreover, it is necessary to understand that some weapons are provided to ukraine, they are not provided, as a rule, this is not determined by these with all the rhetorical techniques that russia uses, and this is precisely t

the territory of the united states, neighbors, that is, canada and mexico, from whom the united states is going to defend itself, so it is not clear, this is a tactical system, this is an army system on the scale of the united states, they use for anti-missile defense, including ballistic, completely different systems, petrio is not even located there the nomenclature of these anti-missile systems, so ... i think the idea is to somehow, in any way, persuade biden, with the help of melons, with the help of any arguments, that the united states could transfer these systems to us , i think that they should be used now, for example, i even advocated such a project, transfer to europe, to european countries, for example, romania and poland, transfer 30 systems. they can then be restored and gradually transferred to ukraine, it would be better than just talking about what romania is transferring to us there the single patriot air defense complex, or poland and romania should shoot down some aerial objects over ukrainian territory, well , you know it all, it's delaying, it's confusing the sit

and so therefore i do believe a ground invasion is possible again, if not simply to bring the united states uh fully in on on the side of of the apartide state of israel. that's right, mr. yahubian. mr. jones, as mr. yahuban is saying, do do you think uh will the us be able to, i mean israel be able to uh drag the us into lebanon, i mean uh, us foot soldiers on lebanese soil. well, that's that's a very big question. uh, i don't know if "the us military would be prepared to do that, you've seen even um pullback from them with regard to the escalation of the situation in ukraine by uh by opposing the notion of long-range weapons going into ukrainian hands, so people who are fighting the war generally are not the ones who are most in favor of the war, it's your political elites, those who don't wear the uniform, who are willing..." to do that and unfortunately they will be making the decision, it it's a very dicey situation uh if it leads to an all-out war in the middle east uh the us somehow uh will either have to step in as eisenhower did once upon a time uh in the uh the suez crisis uh or i

united states is great. you know, we're like the drunk fat change. smoking mother in law tried to order everybody else around and tell them what to do and the world's tired. they want to be left alone. they want to do their own business. and the united states just sort of sit down, it shut up instead of meddling. but that's what, you know, we can't help themselves. all right, we're gonna leave it there. larry johnson, former c i a analyst, the ceo of berg associates, larry, great to have you on as always. good evening, rachel. the is really prime minister, has rebuffed the statements that his government is close to securing a ceasefire with him off. benjamin netanyahu claims the gods and militant group keeps sabotaging this prospects of a deal, but as well as american allies insist and agreement is already within reach. these strips that we've had over the last couple of months where it's been extraordinary work done to yeah, to get a framework agreement that both parties signed onto then to work, to fill in

these really requests for united states is unlikely to happen because the united states to once to maintain its relationship with of africa in order to come to the influence of russia and china. do say with rti international up next on the list of laura's john t. r. code discusses with journalists and mazda rosenberg, and the impact of the pharmaceutical dominance on public health. in the us, the many americans have convinced themselves that we have the best medical care in the world. we have the best and most innovative drugs in the world. and the doctrine of american exceptionalism is not just common. it's adhered to by most americans. the united states, they believe, is not just the greatest country that has ever existed. it may even have been divinely inspired, but one needs only to take a peek under the foot of that car can see the systemic problems. how is it possible that in the wealthiest country in the world, medications are so expensive that some people, mostly the for, and the elderly often has to ration them, or they actually die because they can't afford the costs. how is it po

out because polls in the united states show most americans in the united states favour a palestinian state. i mean, clear now that your uh, full, my boss is the only option is the drawer, the and i, it states in to this conflict and iran are not biting, have not been biding since the israeli assassination of, as well. any, uh and uh, what, what does this real going to do when the united states? uh, whether it be this generation or the next is good by israel. we have israel because of what israel does is regards human rights violations. we are quite capable of sending our sales by our sales weight. ready sorry to jump so quickly, but you're not valued because that's why the americans are giving you tens of billions or hundreds of millions of dollars weapons without the united states. you are you, you don't have a country. i don't think so. if you look at the united states as defense, age to nature, to south korea, to japan, it's 100 times where the are doing with is with is right. it's more security corporation. they enjoy our technology, their enjoy, our strategic and tactical lead.

the united states military didn't do that that was a decision made by the united states. but nonetheless, those who went, those who sacrificed, and particularly those families who lost loved ones there, i can't begin to understand part of it. i would words of mind would be cheap and tawdry to try to get into that space. but i do believe it was a good cause i do believe that they went they fought well and bravely and did as well as we could, given a very difficult difficult set of circumstances as those who did. they fought in vietnam in an earlier generation. you know, all wars aren't pretty. all wars aren't perfect. but the american military and the fighting men and women who go out and do the nation's bidding, we don't get to pick those wars. and if we don't like them, perhaps remedies back here in the united states involving elections that we should approach in order to change people who actually do make those decisions. thank you. good answer. i want to ask you also, you spoke about this in some of the other interviews that you've done about the israeli prosecution of

i know think they have a free trade deal is the united states with. the united states? yes they have more a free trade agreements than think any other asian countries. so what does that what does that entail? what that mean to have a free trade agreement? yes. that they have. no no or less tariffs and that they have not so much restrictions that even now, if you feel that something is not okay, you can go to an international court and sue them and they will accept it. vietnam, there's a difference in china. you can't do it they will never accept if an international will say this was but they accept it. so this is another thing they are more free than china and china they had also a great story with thanks to helping the eighties their start is the free market reforms but now with chuchu ping it goes back in the wrong direction. mark less state. and so there's a there's a slogan escape from china and they go to vietnam now because it's small free also freedom of speech of course it's not as it is here in the united states or europe, but it's more free than in china. for

these really of across the united states is unlikely to happen because the united states to once to maintain its relationship with.

but when it comes to strategic industries we have to build a capability either in the united states orbetween the nine states are democratic allies should be able to make sure we can produce critical minerals, critical medicines, critical high-technology products in the united states or countries reaffirm iraq solid alliances with pickwick to specifically say not decoupling this it ministration's been not saying the couplet donald trump of course is for 60% tariffs on all goods coming from china. when you consider the economic relationships are terse and appropriate be using? democrats include this administration. [inaudible] tariffs are completely legitimate very important and effective tool. i think for a long time we looked at tariffs and trade policy as a way to try to convince china to behave differently. i think it is pretty clear china is on a committed and uncontested pappy will continue to cheat for they will continue to steal intellectual property. they'll continue to dump products on the international market. so today with tariffs and trade policy are probably more effective

this visit because of the election struggle, let's say , the internal political struggle in the united statesstates, but the final results will be summed up, i think, when the president returns home. and those decisions that he will make already at home, so to speak, in that included in the internal personnel policy of ukraine. we'll see, we're waiting for his return, but now let's start with, well, not the main thing, but one of the main things: volodymyr zelenskyi planned and met with the current president of the united states of america, joe biden, and with the presidential candidate, kamela garis, among those i... watched these interviews, then reread the transcripts, and from what i saw, i thought that they were, well, the announcement was very serious and pathetic. of all what happened, it seems to me that these were some, unfortunately, it seems to me, meetings for the sake of meetings, nothing new, well, since we were not participants in either these or previous meetings, it is unlikely that we can assess what was new that was said in closed part, whether or not new, we can guess and

to drag the united states into war.ovich, what is your assessment as a military expert, will a ground operation begin, everyone is talking about this now, this. it is obvious that we are moving towards a much larger war, and it is much more difficult for any of the parties to reach any agreement. of course, the united states will continue to supply israel with everything it needs because of yes... our ties, but at the same time at the same time it is important to make it clear that we cannot allow full-scale wars in the middle east, now is not the time and place for that, frankly, in the end everyone will pay a price for it, which will lead to catastrophic consequences in the future. he says this because he is a democrat, and he is well aware that a full-scale war will benefit donald trump and weaken kamala haris's attempts to win the election, but do you think the united states can keep israel from a full-scale war? already ground invasion of lebanon, well yes , of course, such a situation is not beneficial for the uni

, so that one day in the morning this news in the united states... in the united states, so thatt is not the first, so that had time to find out and react but somehow the reaction turned out to be so sluggish that you see, skabieva directly, that's all sadness in her, sadness, oh my god, they didn't hear, they didn't hear, what to do, my mother, so they heard, they heard, in fact, moreover, well for example, the well-known minister of defense of germany pistorius managed to react and even. somehow, i would say, reacted very clearly. i want to say what i said before, this is part of vladimir putin's toolkit. my role and our role is not to be the mouthpiece and distributor of his threats. it's not even worth commenting on. tomorrow will be something else. we are sticking to our course, we are doing what we think is necessary to make it clear that nato stands by its position, and if it comes up with something else, let it spread it in its own way. that is, there will be no discussion of any of these threats , because they were treated as they were treated, that is, as for another ex

trump being the 47th president of the united states.plause] but before we get into politics, i want to take a moment to reflect it is hard to believe that almost a year has passed since the brutal hamas attack on october 7th. and the horror and grief of that day are still fresh. we've all seenl the painful news from israel last weekend. we mourn the brutal murder of hersh of carmel of alexander of elmog, aden and mori we are heartbroken for the people of israel. this moment calls for strength and resolve as we stand united with the government and people of israel as they fight this existential threat our thoughts and prayers are always with our brothers and sisters in israel. we're all keeping the brave idf soldiers and the hostages being held in gaza in our thoughts and in our prayers. and hope to see all of the hostages safely returned and soldiers home with their families in peace. at this moment i would like to take a few moments to say two chapters of psalms for soldier and hostages still in harm's way psalms are traditionally with

williams, united states navy. [bell] major dwayne williams, united states army. chief petty officer marvin roger woods, united states navy, retired. [bell] captain john d. yamnicky sr., united states navy, retired. vicki yancey. [bell] petty officer second class kevin w. yokum, united states navy. [bell] chief petty officer donald m. young. united states navy. [bell] edmond g. young jr. [bell] lisa l. young. [bell] shu yin young. [bell] and her husband yuguang zheng. [bell] >> ♪ amazing grace how sweet the sound that saved a wretch like me i once was lost but now am found was blind but now i see ♪ twas that grace that taught my heart fear and grace my fear relieved how precious did that grace appear the hour i first believed amazing grace how sweet the lord has promised good to me his word my hope secures he will my sin and portion keep as long as light endures ♪ through many dangers toils and snares i have already come tis grace has brought me safe thus far and grace will lead me home ♪ amazing grace amazing grace ♪♪ >> ladies and gentlemen, please stand for the

diplomats of the united states of america will become active. this shows that the united states of america in cooperation with the zionist regime from various sources in the military field, we are witnessing that in some way it is constantly feeding this regime and replenishing its tanks with military equipment in the operational field and helping in the command and operational discussion. in the field of war, in the field of intelligence the satellites of the united states of america and western countries are completely at the disposal of the zionist regime and they can help it in the field. even the information of the news sources that they have in the technological field , that is, all the discussions of cyberspace are accompanied by the use of new technologies that everyone is using mobile phones and such discussions, and this shows that the united states of america is not only aware he is not, but as a colleague, and sometimes he is the operator of many operations in the united states of america, that is, himself the presenter there is, but

the president of the united states, the united i united states, the united states have long standingiden administration has spent a lot of time courting prime minister modi of india. they have a very solid relationship but i think this is simply a gesture that there is a comfort level across there is a comfort level across the four of them and it is a reflection of the deepening conversations, regional conversations, regional conversations, that they are having across japan, australia and india and the united states. i, i, i, , , i i, states. you mention how special and important — states. you mention how special and important india _ states. you mention how special and important india is _ states. you mention how special and important india is to - states. you mention how special and important india is to the - and important india is to the united states. we remember only a couple of months ago we saw the renter modi in moscow hugging vladimir putin and putin calling modi my dearest friend. is that a problem for the us? it friend. is that a problem for the us? , i, i, , i, the us? i

and that would be the united states accepting it. that would be a disaster for international law, for the rule of law, and would send a horrible message to the middle east and the pacific. that if you just wait the americans out sooner or later than they'll get then and you can get, accomplish your political objectives. with military force, i think that would be an unambiguous disaster for europe and united states and international security. let me ask before we run out of time the, the future, the fate of this more of how much of it depends on the outcome of election day in november in the united states. you know, there's a term in american politics. i used to teach american politics at west point, among other things, is that elections matter? you hear the wash and the lot, i think us policy toward ukraine in europe and russia are, there is very true. there's 2, they're very different. the policies on offer here. when you look in some regions, you think 81 administration might be a little stronger. you look in your, i think i hear s

united states.need these letters for a fairy tale, in the 39th kingdom, the thirtieth state. indeed, they gradually came to power, so we laughed at bush, but bush, in theory , the younger bush was already a great president, i met him, i liked the man.

it's also drives the interest of the united states and bio and the united states imperialism from time to time. have used its domain on leverage on um, uh, on the bottom of information to drive its on another deuce. and it saves money tendencies. you know, on the, on the global level share there. so the binding of alternative that out feeds. right. uh, that was actually one good through like, and then pollution that he means to democratize information, chatting on. and that was what a, you know, that meant to platforms, including facebook has been cutting itself on. but they only talk about the freedom of the press as long as that's the normal defense they have as the united states and the, that is them. and things the, the wild seems to be the end of the cornwall and the united states. you know, that sort of decree adding that they want to beat us in the quota, will be able to use the leverage in terms of information. and this information on the wall is now continuously being challenged. and that is why you see such an option. it's like trying to, you know, bon sutton, media outlets t

we will ban its judges and prosecutors from entering the united states. we will sanction their funds in the us financial system and we will prosecute them in the us criminal system. we will do the same for any company or state that assists an icc investigation of americans. the us secretary of state mike pompeo also announced sanctions on fattu bensuda, former prosecutor of the international criminal court, and stated that this action was one of the important achievements of the trump administration. the us state department also restricted the issuance of visas for other personnel of the international criminal court. the united states is not a party to the icc, we will take all necessary measures to protect our citizens from this renagrade, unlawful, so-called court. the september 11th attacks. started at 8:14 a.m. with the report of the hijacking of american airlines flight 11 and ended with the crash of the united airlines flight 93 at 10:03 am. but despite the fact that there was no afghan member among the hijackers, afghan people were under continuous attacks for 175,200 hours for

what is the united states approach of this? before you answer let me note i'm sure everyone in this room you've seen the interview we did was secretary of state mallory stewart about this question. she said the united states would be interested in engaging with a china on the dialogue but have many questions about what their proposal at this. if you could elaborate on that and tell us why that's an opportunity to engage with china in the days and weeks ahead? what, i am happy to expand on mallory's answer there. i want to note these types of discussions i been a topic of five our experts are arms control experts have been tip of this fear trying to engage the prc, russia and allies on a regular basis on the topics. for that prc to really want to engage on this topic it would make sense for them to try to initiate a more serious discussion which we do not shy away from. we are not afraid to engage on these issues that is why we have been the ones asking for the engagement. if the prc is interested in making a specific proposal on

[applause] united states mint director, miss bentris gibson. [applause] and from the military district of washington, our chaplain for today's event is chaplain will horton. [applause] at this time, please rise for the presentation of colors, the playing of the united states national anthem by the united states marine brass quintet, and the invocation by chaplain horton. >> hut, hut, hut. >> colors halt. present arms. ♪ ♪ [national anthem] ♪ ♪ [national anthem] ♪ ♪ [national anthem] ♪ >> right. order, arms. hut. turn, march. >> hut, hut, hut. hut, hut, hut. >> would you join me in a word of prayer? mighty god, we thank you for the strength of the nation that we love and the military forces that over the years have comprehensively trained and built a proportional force to defend our nation in a time of war. a force that ethically and morally stands above all others. on this at -- 80th anniversary of d-day, we commemorate the combined efforts of the american military ranches in the allied forces who came together in the infamous hedgerows of norm

of america. to the president of the united states , joseph biden, and it will happen after september 25, when the un general assembly begins. mr. alexander, do you know? the content of this document, have you seen the draft of this document, because since it is not just zelensky's victory plan, it is a victory plan for ukraine and ukrainians, as a ukrainian, for example, i am interested to know what is in this victory plan? well, i don't see. that there is a peace formula of president zelenskyi, which is very specific in nature, if it is specifically about this victory plan, then i am not sure that it should be made public, maybe, well , he has the right to know about this plan, about the details of this plan only that circle, let's say our allies, partners, from on whom does the help to ukraine depend, that is, it is possible even there... some secret things that should not be brought out so that the enemy does not know, for example, does not, does not use this knowledge, that is, i am very concerned. before i tell you, let's say so, about the openness of this plan, well, you speak

to do as the united states wants, are have to think a lot before doing this. unfortunately, there are countries such as argentina, the cou government in peru. the government of ecuador that are going along with the us agenda, but i think that um, and and those are part of the new fascist wave that we see not only in latin america but in europe, um, and and that's very unfortunate, but the countries that um value their sovereignty are very much disillusioned with the united. dates telling them how to run things. all right, thank you, thank you for that. let's bring back maria fernanda bareto, who is a venezuelan-based writer and director. maria, welcome back to economic divide. i'd like to continue with a train of thought here, which is the us sanctions regime, obviously leveled against venezuela, it has impacted it's economy uh to very high degree, and my question to you is uh whether other. latin american countries actually are taking note of the us approach, using the sanctions as a a weapon against countries and how that maybe have uh to have backfired agai

the united states did not.ident roosevelt at that time suggested it, the private broadcasters, abc, mutual radio, they probably, cbs protested if theve government got involved in broadcasting it would cut into their listenership, their audience, plus there was always the fear and we have that in the unitedgo states somehow governmt broadcaster can't be trusted which i frankly think is not necessarily the case but that's a different story one we could debate, if you wish. so the view, it started only, only after the attack on pearl harbor and it was really the world war ii that created voice of america and it functioned very importantly. it's first war in german were we will bring you the news, we will tell you what happened whether it's good for us or not and probably established itself very quickly as very dependable. we would talk about losses, something that most countries would never broadcast that we lost a battle or we have great difficulties wherever that may be and coming out of world war ii, there was

this agreement to a certain extent transcends the policy of sanctions that the united states has beenrying out. recently against all the states that act against its interests, the us and its european puppet states keep attracting the dprk, democratic people's republic of korea, but as we see, after years of sanctions, they have proved to be ineffective, and what's more, these sanctions have forced the koreans to develop depending on their own forces. the agreement that kim jong-un reached with the russian federation, in particular with president vladimir putin, is an... agreement that provides an opportunity for korea to grow faster and boost its productive forces. korea has managed to provide free healthcare system for its nation, but we shouldn't forget that the us government sanctions have targeted its health system and even the un itself recognizes that these sanctions sought to amputate in the very development of korean's healthcare. the issue of culture of exchange of politics of russia is not something new. it goes back to the time. at the beginning of the third world war, we'r

the president met with the leaders of the united states of america, with the president of the united states, joe biden, with the vice president and democratic candidate kamala harris, and in the end , he still managed to meet with another candidate for the position of the president of the united states, donald. trump even after a certain scandal. in general, the president presented a victory plan during this meeting. by the way , also with congressmen and senators. there were meetings with the defense industry of the united states of america. well, in short , lots and lots of things. mr. vitaly, if we summarize like this first, how would you describe it? this visit, or relatively speaking, the victory plan, as they say, was presented positively, did this trick work with him, and whether it was successful, you often talk about the victory plan, mr. andriy, and you noticed that in the last days of the visit, about the plan almost nothing was mentioned about the victories, and no one spoke anymore, that is exactly why i am asking you, how would you characterize all this in the context of

strategy and the plan deserve for attention, he supports the position of the representative of the united states at the organization of the united nations. victory plan for roman petrovich, yes. i think this is the starting point for our analysis. we we understand that this is an extremely ambitious application on the part of ukraine. we will hope that the united states will adhere to all points of this plan. but, as the classics said, option b is also possible. well, taking into account the fact that some points may not be covered by the united states. we want to believe that everything will be smooth, well, but we understand. we know that real politics, unfortunately, sometimes leads to such unpleasant decisions, and in this situation the most interesting thing is that there is no official discussion of this document in the united states of america it is already underway, but its writing in kyiv did not end with at least some conceptual drafts of this document being seen in ukraine or publicly. were made public, and what do analysts use today? by the fact that they take parts of this document

it also creates an overall environment in which the journalists and the public at large in the united states is fearful to speak the truth to speak out in fear of retaliation. and then also recently with this press conference that was held by anthony blinking just last week, he stated that due to the new sanctions leveled against our t, other russian media outlets. and for parent companies, that it is now the obligation of these organizations to provide the employee information of those working in the united states on behalf of these russian companies as well as their property information. so it base questions as to what is going to happen to these journalists and media personnel. are they going to be subjected to more rates, more asked of intimidation? this goes again against and contrary to the fundamental rights of started in the 1st amendment, or whether it's accusations that he was government has said that the r t is a reason for a lack of support for ukraine among global south countries. what are your thoughts? is in such a statement, right, so i think that the united states and the we

, i found it had just specially written an article about the fact that the intelligence of the united statesof america stated the risks due to possible strikes by ukraine on the territory of russia, this is about what mr. vitaliy just said , that they will also calculate, and whether it should be done or not from the point of view of some certain expediency, the number of missiles there, the possibility of hitting targets with these missiles, why the us intelligence supposedly thinks so, because russia... has already carried out some part of his aviation, some of their warehouses or something else, already to a more distant territory, accordingly , they believe that in fact the potential risk is greater than the potential benefit, but at least there is such information, here, here, in fact, you can agree or disagree, but we will about this... talk more, discuss it more, and for now , a short break, and you and i will return to the live air on the espresso tv channel. wait. an unusual look at the news. good health, ladies and gentlemen, my name is mykola veresin, sharp delivery facts and comp

russia and the united states shake hands and immediately head to negotiations. we follow them.itement is off the charts, journalists are rushing into the room where the leaders are. and the american organizers in response shout so loudly that they interfere with the presidents, they cannot get organized, start talking. they ask journalists to leave the room already, because the presidents must start, of course , negotiations, they have been waiting for a very long time, well, you see that american journalists are trying, for them this is of course the only opportunity to ask questions, avoids a joint press conference, if we take what would be dangerous and unacceptable for the state, the deployment of our missiles in cuba, the flight time to washington, 15 minutes, is this a red line for the us or not, but for us, but someone should talk about this think, think about how we should react to what is essentially being proposed and discussed, our historical territories with a population of russian speakers... from peace, calm, prosperity and trust, well, what's wrong with that, not