friendly forces either united states or friendly to the united states i mean it's a country under siege i want to stay with my palm pale mohamed because he seems to have this kind of weird kind of psychological kick because when he hears iran he hears the echo of al qaeda after all these years he's still playing that that somehow there is a connection between iran and al qaida it's an extraordinary and very few in the media push back on it. yes and the fact is that there is a direct link between the united states and yeah right now in syria the last stronghold of al qaeda the united states is preventing the syrian government the syrian armed forces from getting rid of this major occupation this occupation of this this horrific terrorist organization so it's ironic that after less than today decades after september the 11th and subsequently this whole war on terrorism 3 which was as a result of september the 11th since 2011 the united states has been supporting al qaeda and we have to remember that isis was al qaida us which broke away and became isis or i.a.s. so but in addition to that

once the united states the united states and the united states opens its software locally as well as a result of huge costs what we need is also sloan so as out there i want to change and social mobility is changing over that period is not growing as well so a good solution in the market any thoughts on meet me at space crowds and more growth and where the unity of the people is known that angle it won't choose and then it won't. cost of. that website as macro view dot edu thanks for being on the kaiser report thanks max my pleasure all right that's going to there for this admission of the kaiser report with me max kaiser and stacy herbert like to thank our gas cosseting macro view dot a you if you want to catch us on twitter it guys are important and i stand by. the swarms of them so i'm only. good viewers who are quotable for. much of those who heard it's a preview of the most moving. north. but it. sure didn't look beautiful the media collector who the. mole most of his goals the. good you've gone for good good good. good good issue also look look you're the same you want to kiss

or they the international community would say that the 1st that the united states and its allies because they want europeans even they want to have pressure against iran in order to stop iran from reducing its nuclear commitments under the nuclear deal also you know they want to have some make some allegations against iran there is no evidence look what the united arab emirates official said recently they said there is no evidence but before any investigation the americans and some western countries as well as some players in the region to try to let's say make allegations against iran and there was a tape recording between the. official talking to. the still very. this tape is still on verify yeah but no one has rejected has been no denial i mean you cannot make the whole case on these unnamed more details that is one of the in the. this is something this so the arabia and the americas they have been always talking without doing any investigation they have been attacking iran and alleging that iran has done that because from an american perspective iran is at fault everywhere an

you are the president of the united states who understands how it works perfectly. you understand that when the u.s. looks at europe, when it looks at the european states it plays a key role for peace around the globe. it is important for a peaceful development of democratic state and democratic community. thank you, mr. president, for this extreme kindness towards poland and perfect understanding of polish matters. it shows in 2017 during your visit to poland, during your memorable speech that you gave at the monument of the warsaw uprising, which are of historic importance to our nation and to europe. they showed what poland means and who the polish people are. thank you for this policy which is being implemented right now, which demonstrates that you are this type of man and this type of politician to whom first and foremost are the people. when you say make america great again, this is of special importance. hence the agreement that we are signing, hence the agreement with the united states in the understanding which we saw just a moment ago. one of them i find p

, they see it as a strategic initiative by the united states to dominate the oil market, because of that is where they get the majority of their money. the point is is that the russians believe that there is a "deep state." and the "deep state" in the united states hit them and wants them to go away. so for them, they see, it is hard for them to see a difference between the obama administration and the trump administration when it comes to this inexorable set of measures that the united states continues to take when it comes to do them with russia. number 2, they are more fearful of our military and our political leadership. when they look at n.a.t.o. or u.s. political leadership, it -- things ebb and flow but american military and senior officers are implacable. they have one at the same thing since they were young and they still do. so they are very fearful of the u.s. military and what it does. the way that we enable that or accentuate that in their mind is that the u.s. military is all over the world doing lots of things. i remember one time on my russia tour, general ben hod

we're confident that we can achieve an outcome that advances the national security of the united states. i want to talk a little bit about the state department's role here. just a little bit about what our bureau does. people readily know and talk about, and i'm sure everybody in this room about rageagan's trus but verify comments in 198 in reykjavik. it was in 1982, where he outlined four key tenets of the arms control regime that i think are important today as they were in 1982. just run through them real quick. number one, compliance with the provisions of existing and future arms control agreements is essential to their success and therefore to national security. that effectively verification is necessary to ensure compliance with those agreements. verification serves to detect and deter possible violations of an agreement and provide time warning threats to our national security. verification is necessary to assure the confidence of the congress and the public at large. that the specific arms control measures are compatible with our security and for effective arms control, the gove

and once the united states the united states and united states opens its software local the as well as a result of which are often what we eat is also slow and wow so as out there i want to change and social media is changing over that period is not growing as well so a good solution on bomb or anything else that will meet me at its base crowds and more growth and where that gets on the table is no longer painful because it won't all the cheese and then it won't. cost and jane garvey of as so i thought website as macro view dot edu thanks for being on the kaiser report thanks mox my pleasure all right not going to dare for this admission of the kaiser report with me max kaiser and stacy herbert like to thank our gas cosseting our macro view dot a you if you want to catch us on twitter at kaiser reports and i stand by. live. live . live. oh. please. list. just slow lists. lists. and very well might continue watching on since last. i agree has long positioned itself as a sovereign player within the e.u. . stand up to brussels. when it comes to its own national interests but when it co

not mean united states of america, it means united states army, these were army vehicles. here you can see the code in this little bunker. coal was in this little bunker. this was used near the front because they did not want the smoke and fire from the steam engines to leasing close to the front, as it would indicate a buildup of something. everything had to be moved within 20 miles of the front because everything near the trenches was contaminated. the ground was contaminated from gas, poisons from the artillery shells, water had to be brought in, everything had to be brought in by train. and when you got close, a couple miles to the trenches, they would use these. until then, they used these mechanicals, and before that they would use the steam locomotives. this is one of the gasoline mechanicals. by the way, as far as hiding any troop movement to the front for the germans, it was impossible, because these things made so much noise you could hear them 10 miles away. so i do not know if it did much good. other general pursing -- pershing used these for his victory. this

the other 6 were what powers but particularly the europeans and the united states have not and they don't do what they promised to do not after president trumped unit added we withdrew from 2 nuclear program the europeans tried to. try to somehow manage to convince iran not to get out of the nuclear deal and against them instead you refer to a sort of a compromise but unfortunately the europeans have not deliberate act all that mechanism has not worked because the europeans are really place between a hard place on the heart wrong they cannot abandon the u.s. because the u.s. is their strategic ally and at the same time they do not want to see the end of the new deal they have to deliver more and the reason why eat on has decided to take some measures against the nuclear deal is to put pressure on the europeans to deliver and it's now time for the europeans to either deliver or iran might take additional actions but deliver what exactly that is the question. deliver us to liberty a peace the transfer of medicine and argue culture a product to eat on at this time and then later on to allow

so the iranians are saying we will not appease the united states if the united states wants to talk about even other issues than the nuclear program they have to show that they are reliable partners that they can commit themselves to previous agreements and that they will implement them if those were implemented then perhaps the iranians and the americans would be able to talk about other issues but the americans have gone down a very different road and because of that not only can the iranians not renegotiate the nuclear deal that is impossible but they cannot negotiate with americans on any other issue because the americans are unreliable so trump is has is now standing in a dead end he can only escalate which is dangerous or he has to retreat which is something that i find it very difficult for someone like him to do to remain leverage in washington is there any chance that they can hold talks that are basically built on the idea of mutual interest. i think potentially talks based on mutual interest i have tremendous respect for my my colleague in teheran professor marandi but i

and gas tankers from the united states are coming to the ports today and the gas from the united states become a fact in poland in our part of europe. thank you, mr. president, that there are going to be more supplies i'm happy. to us it means diversification of sources and gas security. to us it means good business just i believe it's good business for the united states of america, but thank you also for the agreement cooperation in terms of nuclear energy used for civil purposes i hope that together we will be able to implement this program with the benefit for environment protection with the benefit for climate protection across the globe and also for the development of the security of my homeland. mr. president, i am deeply grateful for this visit. i'm pleased that we're able to show the very good cooperation that we have between poland as part of european union and the united states, and i firmly believe that thanks to your incredible view of the european matters and thanks to ur understanding to our polish matters and to the me anders of our history, this cooperation is going to d

before they were helping illegal aliens cross in the united states of america. host: the secretary of state in florida making the decision to send more troops to the middle east. >>'s been our mission since the beginning of this administration to convince the iranian regime not to move forward with their nuclear program and not to engage in all the activities they have been engaged in around the world. it's why we put in place the pressure campaign that has now been ongoing for a year and a couple months. it's been very effective and now we need to make sure that we continue to do that so that we ultimately get the opportunity to convince iran that it's not in their best interest to behave in this way. host: should more members of the military be involved in that action? >> to the extent they are a satisfactory deterrent. yes. but for emphasis we should not engage in a military conflict with iran unless it's part of a major international f where we are a team member, not the only person on the boat using the oars. host: do we have those allies? >> at this point i

in the united states, our states, it was more than 70,000 lives. globally, the cost only increases. in 2015, the latest year for which the data is available, -- i cannot get rid of this. it was 450,000 lives. these estimates don't consider the lives lost due to the violence associated with this illicit trade. both in the united states and in the source and transit countries. in fiscal year 2019, this year, 22 countries have been identified as major transit or source countries for illicit drugs. profits obtained from narcotic production find dangerous cartels, transnational criminal organizations in mexico, china and countries in central america and south america. and their profit margin is only increasing. last year, more than 133 thousand pounds of heroin, cocaine, meth, and now fentanyl, where two little grains is enough to kill an individual, were seized in the united states. to date, this year, nearly 101,000 pounds of the substances have already been seized. and we are just halfway through the year. narcotics production funds the insurgency in afghanistan. the world's largest s

in order to resolve the from the issues with the united states underneath the issue was the. beginning point in order to resolve other issues maybe including the regional issues so they engage in negotiations that could last for years they had the nuclear deal but the new president inside the united states after taking office he withdrew from the nuclear tang nuclear deal after some time so. you know iran sees no guarantee if they engage in talks with this administration in the united states. that no other president or another person or even the same person bo you know there's something you know strange and different again so there is no guarantee for you really is to engage in so there's no guarantees for anyone i mean russia is in a pretty similar situation when it comes to compared with iran i mean it faces the same type of political pressures sanctions intelligence after future it's competing with the united states and certain geopolitical fronts and yet i think. that the russians have been taking a very different they're very critical of the american policy but president

pressure is coming from both the united states and china to the original state. i think that pressure is being felt by many countries in the region. people were also having a specific dilemma. we have been having about eight or nine different issues. we had a very strategic dilemma. whether or not to join. whether or not to support the chinese agenda. whether or not to go to the three-day commemoration. in the pacific. i think the frequency will only increase down the road. these issues are very complicated. at least three dishes. first of all, the technical truck. that is a possibility. very difficult to play. i think there might be some images in this particular issue. for instance, among the country. you do not even have a consensus. or even less. master there was a very important counsel. it was the u.s. chief. there are a lot of questions which cannot be answered very clearly. they will only continue. that is the big problem. >> thank you. a little bit of a way. to talk about the south korea relationships. there still one of the most troubled relationships.

least talk with the united states not because iran is going to necessarily get that much from the united states but it can constrain the united states so iran can build its relationship with others and to continue to build its own posture in the region so he'll in london is parts of the dynamic here as far as mr trump. kind of backing him self into a corner or being backed into a corner if you will the way that he it would appear as an according to mohamed in tehran that he has 0 traction now with the europeans because they privately and publicly are still on board when it comes to the j c p o a but they can't do anything more than that because tehran and washington are at loggerheads. well i think i'd like to agree with a colleague from washington which is that iran may now be in a better place optics wise to enter some kind of a negotiation but i think that what we have to keep in mind is their current limit is the text and the letter of the j c p o a those constraints are ones that they feel that they've you know a lot really now a lot abide by and the things that are part of the fram

which therefore means an anti or a knee and legacy and i think that's one of the rationale for the united states and the u.s. administration to that's one of their rationales and in. blaming iran. is it fair to say that this is simply just not very smart from the u.s. state department because in all fairness america has a track record of basing military campaigns on bogus information go for tone can attack never happened leading up to vietnam and weapons of mass destruction didn't exist used as an excuse for iraq you would have thought wouldn't you that america would be providing concrete evidence in such serious masses. ok i do apologize and i really wanted to know the answer to that question unfortunate we have lost the line with as he's a gash in dr middle east politics expert at the university of essex. moving on you tube removed a video by project very task which and covers the way social media up pinterest allegedly senses conservative views now twitter also chimed in temporarily banning the group for sharing internal communications from pinterest the founder of project very task has accus

almost 100 years, tariffs were the taxes we had in the united states. in the 1830's in south carolina, afore slavery became defining issue, they called out the national militia over tariffs. they had a national convention to look at everything in the 1830's because of the tariff fight. so tariffs our taxes, and the challenge with terrorists i

and across all the borders into the united states. the seizures of fentanyl on the southwest border, their purity is different and you see much less pure fentanyl coming across the southwest border and what comes through our mail and express concxds con seenment are in smaller amounts. and i turn it over to my law enforcement colleagues. ms. liskamm: in the cases i prosecuted, we have seen members of a cartel doing everything they can to get their drugs into the united states similar to what mr. chester said. we are seeing lower levels of purchase ity but larger quantities being transported from mexico and being mixed with cocaine and heroin. those traffickers are using any manner and means to get it into the united states. senator: there is a border angle that is very important, border security angle that is very important. let me ask you about the chinese government connection and read to you a quotation from a chinese government official from the national narcotics control commission. he said china's control over fentanyl drugs is

these quad waveband research showing showing countrywide slowing down countrywide adoption in the united states over the 5 g. so maybe we will be legen behind china called now even russia not usually is thought of as a leader maybe poised to pull ahead. and quote so that the states and the leadership of the united states in the u.i. big i mean an impediment for technological development by i mean a trade war that i think everything you just mentioned enemy turn back to london markets here it's built into the mix that russia and china are the enemy i mean look at this this is this preparation of the of the populace. to d.m. russia in china in league together all my goodness you know threatening western institutions and their way of life i mean just a very rhetorical pitch tells you a whole lot about the policy perceptions will we have the united states changing its foreign policy and defense postures assuming that the the adversary said they will fight is not the war on terrorism because it was never a war on terrorism but now great appear power confrontations which of course keeps our defense i

not only to the united states but mainly to the united states. what determined whether you survived or did not? whether you were sent to a place like auschwitz? you cannot reduce it to a single factor but i have tried to list some of the factors. one is the date of your emigration application and whether it was before or after august 1938. it turned out to be a watershed, a period when the persecution of the jews in germany started to become much more dramatic and people who thought they could hang on decided it was impossible. and so the waiting list to emigrate became much longer. the valfer parents in contrast to their children applied after 19 38. sponsors and support networks in the united states were very important because you needed and from ait -- an affidavit relative to get an immigration visa. that was connected to the question of education and wealth. why am large, it was better educated people, people with resources who managed to leave. younger people were the first to try to leave and that was illustrated by the valfer family. the

to find an answer to this question as well what do you make of it just the policy making in the united states is a total mess. ministration is inconsistent repeatedly missed the point they were the secretary of state has been overridden for example in libya most recently. openly blatantly and without any real logic behind it other than the president decided that certain things had to be done in a certain way without really having good information about it in the 1st place to syria policy reflects that as well and so i was in northern syria not so not so long ago in march and speaking with the leadership of the white p.g.d. the kurdish group and when the decision by president trump came in december to withdraw u.s. troops from syria there was suddenly you know overnight it was a big panic because what will that do to us right the kurds were thinking they were not expecting this is totally you know on the fly this policy making we're going to come to kurds before that in syria the syrian government is advancing and is actually about to take the last rebel rebel held stronghold and that's fine w

i'm a united states marine veteran. i'm a united states congressman. and i am a young father. and i do not want my 8-month-old daughter growing up in a country defined by donald trump. donald trump thinks he knows what is patriotism is. he thinks that patriotism is hugging the flag. patriotism is standing up every single day to make sure the flag stands for something. donald trump also thinks that he is above the law. and that is wrong. which is why i was the first candidate in this race to say that the job of the united states house of representatives when a president breaks the law is to start impeachment proceedings and we should have done that a long time ago. i have fought for this country. and i will fight for you. and someone who has been fighting for you for 25 years is jim clyburn. and i just want to tell you one quick thing. when i came to the united states congress, i defeated an 18-year incumbent in my own party. i was not exactly the popular kid on the block. and a lot of people said they would be a good mentor to me. but one man took me under his wing, introduced

the constitution of the united states is the arc typal legal constitution. britain, by comparison, has historically been the arc typal political state. in britain, as in many other countries, including the united states, we have witnessed a mounting tide of hostility to representative politics over the past three or four decades. this has naturally been accompanied by a growing interest in the legal constitutional model, especially among the judiciary. this is, therefore, a good time to be assessing its attractions. and washington is a good place in which to do it. for the legal model raises dilemmas in a democracy of which the united states has a longer and more varied experience than any other country in the world. the prime purpose of any constitution is to provide a framework of political rules for making collective decisions. in its original form of 1787, the constitution of the united states did almost nothing else. the protection of rights came later with the ten meants of 1771, which together constitute the bill of rights. 12 years later in 1803 came

the mueller report subscribes to that and the president of the united states of the united states saysa hoax, a hoax. the president of the united states should be the one taking the lead to look into what happened there. instead he's saying they could do it again. there's something very wrong with this picture. so in any event, the facts, the truth, what's right for our country in the most unifying way, not dividing way. >> the attorney general has been held in contempt by a house committee. there are two paths you can do down. the house can vote criminal contempt or civil contempt. in other case, i assume the department of justice will not be indicting the attorney general. you have a sergeant at arms in the house. you actually have a jail cell in the basement. >> we used to. >> what are you going to do if bill barr -- will the household him in criminal contempt? >> well, the criminal contempt takes a little bit longer. there's a reason they went down the path they went down. i have confidence in our committees. i'm a big believer in the committee system, let the members do the invest

you know spends almost a pittance on arms compared to the united states. and even that's too much apparently that. they're not allowed to help their diverse when the neighbors are asked like in the iraq and syria. on the other hand you know. united states can come halfway around the world and enter fear in syria against the wishes of the state of syria and israel seem party that's joining with the united states in a. kind of tight iran almost a. movie is crazy well mr morsi when you put it like that it's really depressing by the unfortunate if this is the world that we live in anyway we have to leave it there thank you very much for sharing your perspective with that thank you i invite our viewers to keep this conversation going in our social media pages. same place same time here on worlds apart. good food descriptions sound up to easing even for the owners so how to choose just pet food industry is telling us what to feed our pets really more based on what they want to sell us than what's necessarily good for the patent turns out in the truth and may not

institution recently hosted a discussion on the influence of russia and china and what it means for the united states. we'll hear from former state department and pentagon officials in this 90-minute conversation. >>> good morning, everyone, and welcome to brookings. i'm mike o'hanlon, here to welcome you about a discussion with possible wartime scenarios with russia and/or china. this panel has a lot of expertise on these subjects. i'm going to briefly introduce folks in a minute and hand the baton, so to speak, over to my good friend and colleague jung pak, who will be our moderator. she'll pose questions to the panelists. we're talk amongst ourselves for the first half of this 90-minute event then go to you. the panelists have all been kind enough, as well as jung as moderator, to allow me to use my new book "the senkaku paradox" as the spring board for this discussion, but only the spring board, and the conversation will range much more widely. but let me just say a brief word of introduction to the subject before introducing them. just so you know, at least where our starting point is in this pr

but it's not a legal reason to enter into mexico solely for the purpose of coming up to the united statesto cross our border illegally. >> all right. so that's number one. kurk irregular migration. that is in the text of this deal we're reading from the u.s. department of state. number two, you mentioned the mpp. i want to make sure everyone understands what that is. migrant protection protocols. what it is is essentially a protocol that is in place whereby migrants who come to the u.s. and claim asylum they actually, some of them at present wait in mexico. and correct me if i'm wrong on any of this. because you know this. you did this for years. they currently wait in mexico for some of them for the adjudication of their claim. and what this new measure is seems to say all of them will now wait in mexico to see their claim being adjudicated. >> yes. now, that is going to be an absolute game changer. if people are going to be waiting in mexico pending their asylum claim rather than crossing our borders illegally and then being released into the united states, that's going to get rid of th

they are not in forcing their own law and this is the action of the united states essentially pressing the mexican government to do just that the threat in all of this from donald trump is if mexico does not do that he will impose tariffs of 5 percent starting next week and incrementally building potentially up to 25 percent a threat he reiterated today. i think a lot of progress 3 years believe we're able to make the other group work you're going. to make it for many many years i'm going to be a big you know we're going to make you remember good fortune for the united states to step up for them to step up to the plate and perhaps they were going to see they could solve the problem. and of course committee we have that deadline of monday looming for the imposition of these tariffs on mexican goods meanwhile the interior minister the interior minister in mexico is saying that they are taking steps to reinforce the southern border is that likely to satisfy president donald trump. yeah and i should clarify when they say the southern border mexico is talking about its southern bor

team outside the united states to tell the world took over. the our planet creating his own history as the finals most valuable player. you know largest caps driving. you know push and you know i may go with the trophy but everybody deserves it is a dream is a dream and and if it was amazing to be able to realize their dreams golden state's meanwhile taste defeat for the 2nd time and their run of fife strike finals ah really proud of the way that we fought to the end and it's 5 euros been been awesome but definitely think it's over everybody thinks it's gonna end of us. this is not a smart. we don't hear the best team of the past 5 years we'll try again next season but they'll have to come up the new kings of the n.b.a. the toronto raptors of canada paul reese i'll just share. all these were the scenes of 4000 kilometers away in toronto after the raptors sealed that 114210 victory on thursday night at their 42 series win over the worry is the biggest sporting achievement by the city since the blue jays one back to back will series baseball tit

united states have little capacity inside the i.m.f. so in order to received their financial support from the i.m.f. well doing it by the government most. it was half the approval of the a major government and of course julian assange it's not just that but the unisons case is related to financial support from the i.m.f. and the cia base that mathabane of of course of course everything everything there is dong they don't have a base now because it is not necessary with the technological advances they need just. in the space of aircraft is in a quandary not in a space elevator after they have a we have now in a boat a lot of military personnel from the united states is enough with that otherwise the base will be there already but they will meet any more a military base in just the same crash we that military person what about the eye and they papers you may have to explain you think they're linked also to the julian assange capture so we have discovered that mourinho is a corrupt and that we are not imagining that we have even a secret a

so the iranians are saying we will not appease the united states if the united states wants to talk about even other issues than the nuclear program they have to show that they are reliable partners that they can commit themselves to previous agreements and that they will implement them if those were implemented then perhaps the iranians and the americans would be able to talk about other issues but the americans have gone down a very different road and because of that not only can the iranians not renegotiate the nuclear deal that is impossible but they cannot negotiate with americans on any other issue because the americans are unreliable so trump is has is now standing in a dead end he can only escalate which is dangerous or he has to retreat which is something that i find it very difficult for someone like him to do and leverage in washington is there any chance that they can hold talks that are basically built on the idea of mutual interest. i think potentially talks based on mutual interest i have tremendous respect for my my colleague in teheran professor marandi but i think

[speaking in polish] translator: gas thinkers from the united states are coming and the gas from the ght states have become a fact in poland and pro- europe. thank you, mr. president. i'm happy about that and it means the diversification of sources for supplies and also means the department of gas security and good business. it's good business for the united states. thank you also for the agreement cooperation in terms of the nuclear energy used for purposes. i hope that together we will be able to implement this program with the benefit for them by mental protection with the benefit for climate protection across the globe and for development of the security of my command. thank you, mr. president. i'm deeply grateful for this visit. [speaking in polish] translator: i'm pleased that we were able to show a very good cooperation that we have between poland as part of the european union and the united states and firmly believe that thanks to your incredible view of the european matters and your understanding to our polish matters and to the meanders of our history this cooperation will d

and once the united states the united states and the united states opens its software locally as well as a result that all of which are often what we do is also use loan so as ultimate wants to change and social media is changing over that period is not growing as well so that new solution in the market anything else that will need the united states crowds and more growth and where the unity of the people is no longer painful isn't it won't choose a. cost of attainder. website as macro view dot edu thanks for being on the casa report thanks mark's my pleasure all right that's going to do it for this edition of the kaiser report with me max kaiser and stacy herbert like to thank our gas cosseting macro view dot edu if you want to catch us on twitter it guys are important and i stand by. what is it calling to coin is magic internet money a new type of digital currency decentralized digital scarcity chancellor on the brink of 2nd bailout for a bank that's called the genesis block for reason calling a civil disobedience a source of optimism because i can't control my own financial death a

the military sector subsidizing agriculture china is doing exactly what the united states and the united states can't understand china because it would have to acknowledge that it itself is a mixed economy and that is anathema to the academics john is and i want to focus on that one question remember to ask john i want to ask how there in michael later is there a win win scenario as we go into this because the even though the terminology we use trade war is if someone has to win or lose i mean it's it's such a black and white issue the way it's portrayed in the media and i find that that is very dangerous because if it's a war someone has to win of course you don't want to lose and it could spread into other areas geopolitics it in the military and which of course none of us want that to go happen so you know is a win win possible here because of the rhetoric coming out of the american media and the administration they make it sound like you know this is a an existential threat maybe it will be one day but certainly not now go ahead john. well the chinese come has been very careful of us

last 1000 years extended under my name in the united states will immediately abide by section 235 and will deploy along this southern border it will imply that those who cross the u.s. southern border to request asylum will be returned to mexico where they can wait the resolution of their application for asylum in its part of mexico for humanitarian reasons and in compliance with international obligations we authorize the entrance of those people to await their asylum applications. we have 2 correspondents covering this story john holeman is standing by in tapachula next to the mexican border with quarter mile of 1st let's take it sue washington and our correspondent there rob randall so rob what does the u.s. commit itself to here. well the u.s. commits itself with mexico to try and shore up the economies and the security situation in these countries of central america where there is so much poverty so much gang violence so much criminality that the that those are described as the root causes after all of migration so there's no price tag attached to that there is no money in the joi

from your reporting, would canada be a coalition partner with the united states if the united statesere to strike iran? guest: i think the language the prime minister used was supportive, as we have seen through the rest of the international community, but much -- like much of the international community, canada is wary of the news overnight and the escalation and they are approaching that like many things with donald trump, with a sense of caution. appreciate your time this morning, thank you. guest: thank you. host: this is what the canadian prime minister had to say when he was in the oval office and reporters asked him about the situation with iran. [video clip] about theconcerned escalation with iran recently. we look forward to discussing --h our closest allies host: that was the prime minister yesterday in the oval office. cnbc is atrts for the white house court every day tweeting out this morning white house official response to my question about president trump's decision to call off the military strike against iran. "we do not comment on preoperational military planning." s

the united states' former secretary of state says he often had to practice diplomacy in the dark rex tillerson told congress that president donald trump's son in law jared cushion or directed his own foreign policy without tillerson is knowledge president trump did not know him and president trump had no idea about how the process was supposed to work he probably thought oh well this is the way i've run my business in a newly released transcript from closed door testimony to the house committee on foreign affairs tillerson says he was surprised to walk into a washington restaurant to find jared cushion or meeting with mexico's foreign secretary i could see the color go out of the face of the foreign secretary of mexico as i very i smiled big and i said welcome to washington and i said i don't want to interrupt what you all are doing i said give me a call next time you're coming to town tillers and says he was taken aback when he was told cushion or in presidential adviser steve bannon knew of the blockade of qatar before it happened question on or about may 20th 2017 there was appare

i want the batteries made in the united states, the charging stations made in the united states? you know who controls that market now? china. 40% to 50% of electric vehicles in the united states are made in china. we need an industrial policy. are electric vehicles democrat or republican? building things. democrat or republican? not sure. but if we drive that investment into communities of color, old coal, old steel, old river communities, old manufacturing, old textile, we intentionally drive the investment to where it needs to go. drive the investment into those forgotten communities. we should do the same thing with solar panels. you know who controls 60% of the solar panel market today? china. because they intentionally want to. as president, i want to intentionally dominate the electric vehicle market. i want us to dominate the solar market. what does that mean for people in new hampshire? it means that we will get away from this economy that people make 12, $13 an hour, and you can have a good job, good union job, with a good wage, tension, security for your family. so you

to deescalate the tensions that have been building for between the united states and iran for some time so this is the latest from the white house this is what the president is saying sort of doubling down on the assessment of the u.s. secretary of state one day earlier again pointing the finger at iran some people ringback in the united states say in what appears to be a bit of a rush to judgment given the fact that this took place just a little more than 24 hours ago and yet already the united states coming to some very firm conclusions can be how it is a white house correspondent thank you for that moment bashar is our senior political analyst joining us now from london you know completely talking about this pointing of the finger at iran just a reach of these things really quickly from the arab league chief the way he said these things he sees behavior of quote a certain policy deepening the confrontation in the gulf there is a problem in the middle east with a very important and large muslim state all this sort of very acute language around a very obvious situation. absolutely but

panelistse of other have highlighted, i think when the cold war ended, the united states looked out of the horizon and thought, we are in a you, permanent state of affairs where the united states has commercial military dominance and we don't have to worry about major competitors including nuclear armed competitors. from the vantage point of today looking back, the last 20 or 30 years seem like just an interlude. we really are seeing a return, i think, of some of the main features of a very real prospect, but great powers with nuclear weapons could potentially get into conflict. that raises some questions that the united states really has had the luxury of ignoring for the years. or 30 for the last couple of decades, the united states has largely contacted military operations all over the world without really having to put much thought into the question of potential adversary nuclear responses. the united states has conducted military operations exclusive a against state that have not had nuclear weapons. so the question of how does the united states calibrated its military strategy to

as far as the united states particularly have an effect on the west coast the united states but we've actually see impacts across the united states from from that long range transport of pollutants as they're things people watching us can do as individuals to help or will only big changes improve air quality. on there's a lot of things we can do. individually by just looking at what you're personally doing in terms of allowing emissions to the atmosphere. to give you a sense of what impact. we've already had across the united states the clean air act since 1990 we've had we've seen a decrease in emissions of 73 percent of the key pollutants that science carbon dioxide. hydrocarbons many many other aspects that has. resulted in a savings of about estimates about truth 2 trillion dollars. primarily due to the 230000 lives that have been saved over that time period in the united states and the 66 reduction in. the hospital visits of about 66000. events per year or so. so that alone would tell you it makes a lot of sense to. to do something about climate change yet you know are we 100 per

united states security.ands, it is right for donald trump to say we are not going to negotiate. rob: could china change the behavior they use? it benefits them so much, the change could be detrimental for their economy. how do you get this done? >> it is going to take a long time which is -- you want to have grand moves with each administration but something every american president for the next several decades has to work on. we have moved into this era of great power competition. it will be on trade, military, allies, relationships. one thing i'd love to seem do is shifting to the second part of his first term, he has been hard on our allies. i would like to seem rewarding the allies are doing a great job, japan is a great ally to the united states. trade is important with japan but it should not override the security benefits they help us with especially regarding china. anything that would be knew that would come out of this, the press would coverage it would be donald trump is a great ally to have in th

supplying lethal weapons to ukraine we have the united states going to the south china sea as remarkably in the middle of trade negotiations here we have a hyper aggressive foreign policy but where is the anti-war movement other than places like this and people like yourselves go ahead medea in washington. unfortunately i think people are so consumed by domestic issues and there are so many important issues in the mainstream media in this country is super hyper focused on domestic issues and on partisan issues and there is very little coverage of what's going on in the world i think for the most part people are unaware of all of these global wars that are still going on 2 decades afterwards and the new threats that are happening so we have an educated public and those who are educated in terms of being active and wanting to get involved tend to be involved in issues related to the environment to the terrible issues of racism. the issues around things like homophobia islamophobia and partisan politics ok but walter is the lack of knowledge the ignorance an intentional ploy by t