williams, united states navy. major dwayne williams, united states army.ef marvin roger woods, united states navy, retired. captain john d.m. nickie, sr., united states navy, retired. vicky yancey. petty officer second class kevin w.yokum, united states navy. chief donald m. young, united states navy. edmond g. young jr. lisa l. young. shuen young. and her husband yu gang jang. >> ♪ amazing grace ♪ ♪ how sweet the sound ♪ ♪ that saved ♪ ♪ a wretch like me ♪ ♪ i once was lost ♪ ♪ but now i'm found ♪ ♪ was blind ♪ ♪ but now i see ♪ ♪ amazing grace ♪ ♪ amazing grace ♪ >> ♪ amazing grace ♪ ♪ amazing grace ♪ ♪ the hour i first believedded ♪ ♪ amazing grace ♪ ♪ how sweet ♪ remembers remembers ♪ ♪ ness many toils and snares ♪ ♪ i have already come ♪ ♪ grace brought me ♪ ♪ safe thus far ♪ ♪ and grace will lead. me home ♪ fors ♪ amazing grace ♪♪ >> ladies and gentlemen, please stand for the invocation. >> i'd like you to pray with me on this solemn occasion. almighty god, we thank you for your love and your grace. thank you for being here with us today in your migh

engaging the united states in a war with russia could force the united states into serious dialogue.ly teaches the lesson of the caribbean crisis according to these and dmitry, i agree. i even tell you that only last friday. i spoke at a conference at the diplomatic academy, where mr. coach spoke, and according to him , both he and i had, in general, quite similar positions, and he, as i understood it, how can i speak, how i understood him. i know exactly what i think myself uh, we thought that u russia would hold you back as much as possible. here are the applications any nuclear weapons on any targets, but on the other hand, that nothing can be ruled out if the united states takes some kind of action on russian territory, whether it be the territory of the old or the territory that will become russian in a few days as a result of a referendum. i think we all agree on one thing what? uh, mr. sallin's statement has, of course, uh different audiences, and one of those audiences is the american allies, who have begun to worry about the possibility of using nuclear weapons in europe and

the united states is committed to israel's security full stop. and a negotiated two-state solution remains in our view the best way to ensure israel's security and prosperity for the future and give the palestinians the state to which they are entitled. both sides fully respect the equal rights of their citizens. both people enjoying equal measure of freedom and dignity. let me also urge every nation to recommit to strengthening the nuclear nonproliferation regime through diplomacy. no matter what else is happening in the world, the united states is ready to pursue critical arms control measures. a nuclear war cannot be won. and must never be fought. the five permanent members of the security council just reaffirmed that commitment in january, but today we are seeing disturbing trends. russia, the nonproliferation ideals -- russia shunned the nonproliferation ideals. and today as i said they are making irresponsible nuclear threats to use nuclear weapons. china's conducting an unprecedented concerning nuclear buildup without any transparency. desp

it lies in the unjust doubledealing acts of the united states and some u.n. member states. the un security council does not say even a single world -- word about the high-handed arbitrary, reckless war crimes of the united states. only accusing us of our righteous efforts to support national defense capabilities on a case-by-case basis, ensuring that the un security council has lost its competence and authority to act when it performs its duty to maintain international peace and security. as long as the double standards, unfairness, high handedness of the united states are not removed, decisions and resolutions adopted by the security council cannot have reasonable binding force nor the attributes of global peace and security. to put an end to the high handedness of these countries, including the united states, at the risk of the international security council community, with the sampling of these developing countries for the majority of the u.n. membership, as issued in the impartiality of the activities it should stick to the cognizant principles to serve the determinatio

we do not ask any nation to choose between the united states or any other partner but the united states will be unabashed in promoting our vision of a free, open, secure and prosperous world and what we have to offer communities of nations investments that are designed not to foster dependency but to alleviate burdens and help nations become self-sufficient partnerships not to create political obligation but because we know our own success, each of our successes increased when other nations succeed as well. when individuals have the chance to live in dignity and develop their talents, everyone benefits critical of that is living up to the highest goals of this institution. increasing peace and security for everyone, everywhere the united states will not waiver in our unrelenting determination to counter and thwart continuing theorist threats to our world and we will lead with our diplomacy to strive for peaceful resolution of conflict we seek to hold peace and stability in the taiwan straits, remain committed to our one china policy, and we continue to pose unilateral changes in the sta

while the united states is prepared for a mutual return to plan of action the united states is clear, we will not allow ukraine -- we believe diplomacy is the best for this outcome. one of the greatest successes of this institution, we cannot let the world slide backwards. perhaps, singular stands the universal declaration of human rights by which our forebears challenge us to measure ourselves. they made it clear in 1948 that human rights are the basis for all we seek to achieve. fundamental freedoms are a risk in every part of our world. detailed reports by the u.s. commissioner to horrible abuses and the increased oppression of women and girls in afghanistan. today, we stand with the brave women of iran who are demonstrating to secure their basic rights. the future will be one where women and girls can exercise equal rights and committing to building stronger economies and a more resilient society. living their lives without harassment in lbgtq plus communities. where citizens can question and criticize their leaders without fear. united states will always promote human rights in o

my father went to school in the united states. i went to school in the united states. all of my siblings went to school in the united states. and what we do see, which is bizarre, and you and i have spoken about the u.s.-saudi relationship, and we have spoken about this, i think it is a foolish idea to think that the united states deal with china, trunk, 10 years ago, 15 years ago, that is when the conversation was had. today, there is no longer a conversation, right? you can have event like this and actually discuss it passionately. it will tell you the extent to which the chinese have changed, the technologies, etc. now, people in saudi arabia do seem frustrated with the way they are being portrayed in the united states, especially young people in saudi arabia, young women, like in "united states," -- "the new york times," the rating the outfits, the concert. hundreds of thousands of people go to school in america. dr. doran: sorry, just to make sure your point was clear to our listeners, you are seeing articles berating the artist for performing in saudi arabia? mr.

negotiate with the colombian government and stop trafficking drugs won't be extradited to the united states are very radical policies to some. what is your reaction to this? >> you cannot negotiate with criminals. if you provide a safe haven to narco traffickers, your country will become a narco-state. >> so you think he's moving backwards. >> so if colombia decides to negotiate with all the kingpins of the cartels, colombia will turn into a narco-state. prohibition started in the '70s, and it is a policy that has been embraced by the whole world, with very few exceptions. so, if just one country decides to legalize all drugs, it will become the safe haven for narco traffickers. so, can we do something different fighting drugs? yes, we can. do i believe, for example, that you can have more progressive measures in the case of marijuana? i believe so, with some controls. but can we afford, in society, to have legal cocaine in the streets of our cities? i definitely believe that some drugs are not possible to be legalized because they destroy the human being, the human brain, and that they can

i think that unless the united states i united kingdom and of or is the key when the government drops, the idea of pushing russia out. the nuclear danger will remain. because it is absolutely great. it is crystal clear that it is i what do you think they mean by pushing russia out? rush, 6 huge country away. where north could it couldn't be push the you can and you're going to put it on the, on the moon. so how, you know, the boy, you know, president still ask you of your brain, your state, you will continue to fight unless you read takes all the ukrainian land with the mind to mind to run orders. americans are apparently and openly grooving disperse, right? i am, it is absolutely clear that it is impossible to drive russia out through traditional military needs. this is why they turn to nuclear terrorism and the threat of nuclear terrorism as a mean, you know, to try to push russia out in this way. this is why i think the danger will remain unless they change the political purpose. oh, there. oh, there pools, you know, i try to fall in political discussions, both in russia and in the

in the united states. for all the last 6 months, the united states has been constantly crossing the red lines and kind of pushing the red lines. moving the red lines forward and forward with the supplies will be increasingly heavier weapons where the supplies of intelligence information with actually preparing. i am supervising over the ukranian military operations with the approval of the cranium military strikes on the russian data, such as a grania the united states is participating in this conflict in a very be a scale. the scale is growing and this is dangerous. the united states beers, political and christy responsibility for the consequences and for the for the results of the war. and since ukraine is able to show. busy any success, such as the current offensive, which is failing, you know, what the united states is supposed to do, right? what can do united states do on the one hand united states can accept the truth, that it is impossible to defeat prosper in the open military conflict and allow di

the united states is committed to israel's security full stop. and a negotiated two-state solution remains in our view the best way to ensure israel's security and prosperity for the future and give the palestinians the state to which they are entitled. both sides fully respect the equal rights of their citizens. both people enjoying equal measure of freedom and dignity. let me also urge every nation to recommit to strengthening the nuclear nonproliferation regime through diplomacy. no matter what else is happening in the world, the united states is ready to pursue critical arms control measures. a nuclear war cannot be won. and must never be fought. the five permanent members of the security council just reaffirmed that commitment in january, but today we are seeing disturbing trends. russia, the nonproliferation ideals -- russia shunned the nonproliferation ideals. and today as i said they are making irresponsible nuclear threats to use nuclear weapons. china's conducting an unprecedented concerning nuclear buildup without any transparency. desp

is that when you look at if when you look at the map of the united states like call it the map the united states in your mind. okay, like what it looks like today the lower 48 so you're gonna take essentially the entire state of florida. okay, you're going to extend the panhandle of florida and then think about how it begins to make this curve to the northwest. okay, so that curve is gonna follow the south and southwestern boundaries of the louisiana territory, right? so it's going to look like what you know, it's gonna look like you're starting sort of the texas state line and then it's gonna go a little further north perhaps up into colorado, wyoming and then it's gonna hit a straight line almost all the way to california right to almost all the way to oregon territory, okay? so if you're following that line. florida eventually picks up a nickname. all right. it is referred to and it's referred to by. jackson what's by one of jackson's biographers who uses this expression and it's wonderful. it's he said he describes florida as a pistol aimed at the heart of the united states. that if w

the united states visited the philippines as soon as the country tried to gain independence from spaington saw in the main state a strategic opportunity to gain a foothold in asia. well, it became crowded to solve financial issues for big capital within the borders of the united states, and therefore expansion is called both trade, economic and political washington rushed to world domination. about the philippines was a key point of control over maritime communications, a gateway to east asia, so they fought stubbornly for them and did not consider local victims the population was killed in order to discourage others from opposing american domination. although the american chronicle officially calls this war a misunderstanding. after all, the united states bought the philippines from spain for 20 million dollars, and before that you helped manila in the fight against the spanish colonialists, allegedly free of charge, allegedly, without claiming the sovereignty of the island, the filipinos considered american assistance voluntary. free of charge, but washington saw everything, otherwis

in the united states. for all the last 6 months, the united states has been constantly crossing the red lines and kind of pushing the red lines, moving the red line forward and forward with the supplies will be increasingly heavier weapons where the supplies of intelligence information with actually preparing and supervising over the ukranian military operations, with the approval of the ukrainian military strikes on the russian data such as grania the united states is part of this debate in this conflict in a very be a scale. this scale is growing out. this is dangerous. united states is political and steve responsibility for the consequences and for the, for the results of the war. and since ukraine is able to show any success such as the current offensive, which is failing, you know, what the united states is supposed to do, right? what can tonight and states do on the one hand united states can accept the truth, that it is impossible to defeat, proffer in the open military conflict and allow diplomacy

and i come from my father went to school in the united states and i went to school in the united states and all of my siblings went to schoolun in the united states pretty so we do seek iran and you and i have spoken about the u.s. relationship and we've talked to bernie about thisip i thank youo a foolish idea to think that you can replace the united states with china. that is not feasible when ten years ago or 15 years ago, this conversation would've been observant today, we can have an event like this and discuss russia but that only tells you the chinesese are changed and technologies etc. and now the way they are being perpetrated in the u.s. and the young people, young woman who like, one artist or another and posted in the new york times the concepts they pay good money. it's a very adverse reaction. >> is problematic with the unites is because hundreds of thousands of people going to school in america. >> sorry, justol make your point was clear to our listeners, you are saying, articles, for performing in saudi arabia. >> correct. >> and among other articles, and i think

what can tonight in states do on the one hand, united states can accept the truth, that it is impossible to defeat profit. they open military conflicts and allow diplomacy to worry about this is acceptable for them yet because of their state, the purpose of defeating and weakening russia or the other option is actually bureau of the 3rd world war, which is the wallet of increase in for one of the different grease of the military assistance or to your grain, or even open participation of ne though i give this operation, this is a dad law for the united states. and this really creates the stage for escalation. now me to as important as these up a regional plan, it's not the only and you play facility in ukraine. i think that the more stations . and even if with the intervention of the i a, the situation in separation miraculously comes down. do you think a threat of nuclear terrorism or just nuclear black male would receive and by the way, do you think that the americans with that level of control and supervision of the ukrainians that you mention? do you think they have any qualms about t

so if the united states had accepted what was on the table, then we would have had a deal. now instead, the americans gave a response which was obvious to the iranians for to be a tactic or a tax delay, an agreement. and i agree with her guests in washington. i think that this tactic, this delay is due to the internal issues that team biden face it. so the issue is not really iran, if what iran had put 4 or if you runs responses, which the european union foreign policy chief saw as reasonable. if they accepted then by now we wouldn't. right now we wouldn't be. you will have this discussion. ok, hello. let's, let's try to unpack the whole scenario ears, which are going to play out in the near future. 2015. the agreement was based on 3 key components. first, putting some limitations and limits on the iranian nuclear program in exchange for sanctions release. and then the i am going to be monitoring the implementation of that particular agreement. now the i am saying in particular that they're the stockpile of he highly in rich rear. irena has grown enough to produce enough fu

well, in general, i think that the united states is on the decline and the united states and its european allies are facing a much more difficult future ahead. they will not be able to control the rest of the world, like they did in the past. and there, and as we move forward, i think their scope of authority will radically decrease. and whether or not there is ever a punishment in store for the european union who gave for example, chemical weapons stadiums and the united states are giving them the military intelligence to use it. and the political cover to get away with it. whether or not there's ever any accountability is one thing. but what is important is that as the united states find it, adversaries are going to remember these things, whether it's in iran, on us, on venezuela, anywhere, anywhere else in the world. russia, people are going to remember this, and they're going to remember what the united states did to them, and that itself will have consequences. professor at the university of toronto, said mohammed mirandi, thanks a lot for joining us on the program. once again. thank

there is a pistol, as he said, that is aimed at the heart of the united states. when you think about it, we put so much emphasis on strategic importance of new orleans at the end of the war in 1812. where unites the mississippi with the gulf of mexico, the economic implications. the importance of new orleans. the truth is, there are so many competing goals for florida. so many competing national interest in florida. if we cannot resolve florida, how can we possibly expect to move forward with any confidence as a nation? we can do what needs to be done further west. in many ways, florida is already seen as a proving ground. the war of 1812 gives the united states the mandate in many ways to move forward florida. of course, as a way to fight the seminal, the issue that we're going to talk about a little bit more as we go, the issue is also going to turn to slavery. theso many issues in american history. it is also part of the identity a florida. and what message the status of florida begins to send the world around it. we will hit that in a moment. i just remember t

it was passed unanimously by the united states senate. we have now introduced legislation that would require that it be designated a state sponsor of terrorism. i hope it will be adopted as well both in the senate and in the house by the same bipartisan majority. it would tighten the sanctions, increase in height in the consequences for russia. it would also permit actions to be brought in the courts of the united states against russia and others. they would be civilian action but i wonder if you could talk through some of the additional legal consequences to russia and to individuals there if russia is designated as a state sponsor of terrorism. >> thank you, senator i think and i know that all americans share your revulsion in the wake of the ghastly crimes that have been perpetrated by russian forces in ukraine and continue to be perpetrated. but us for the terrorism question, that is beyond my experience, purview, at the department of justice. but i know of it is that it is ordinarily the secretary of state who makes the determination

third nuclear weapons potential in the world, it clearly went under guarantees, including the united stateswas well in principle, the main country. okay, we now consider the aggressor country to be britain. we remember the main and er connections of the state, and therefore for now , fulfilling our guarantees, even i consider it incomplete er, let's say incomplete. because here no, it is not american units that are fighting, and at least giving us weapons - this is just a demonstration in this world of a video about america as a great country that keeps its word and, er, adheres to the guarantees that they give. if this is not done now, then tomorrow the whole world will understand that it is not quality, world guarantees do not work and you need to have weapons that can protect - defend yourself because the country will defend itself, this is the country itself, and now tomorrow all countries will move towards having nuclear weapons. and it will be much more expensive then and much more dangerous. we give them arguments. they agree with them and we will say that this is the job of our dipl

what's your current status living in the united states right now? so after the one month, so when the beatrice came to the to the other one. yes. so they finished. i came to the genia. and then back time i said one month, one month and they're small, come from center in virginia. i'm to, to finish my paper, work even by my cheek and all those things. so it was really hard for all of the local country. we love like friends, property, everything, all of our shipments have said like will be across the very top office to like financial or our paperwork. so now i think there's also the hospital do people who are living in camp like they are, they don't have like, you know, that i to go outside of the camps and they are in the ration. and also they are really truthful and they don't know what's happened to the future. oh, rich country where i except them, i'm the list i think they had like they used for not bring it to the united states . and all the challenges. probably. and also many of the children and also sure that they are the school and they don't

already two statements on this topic made the adviser to the president of the united states to sullivan and the third statement of the secretary of state. damn here. in particular, what jake sullivan said, in his interview with abc tv channel, we directly and privately conveyed to the russians at a very high level that the consequences for russia would be catastrophic if they adopted nuclear weapons in ukraine, we were frank with them and emphasized that the united states will give a decisive answer together with our allies and partners. they understand what they will face if they continue on this dark path, we have designated russian. what will be the consequences, but we are careful how we talk about it publicly, because we want to indicate that it will have disastrous consequences, but not to fight the russians accept our position. we understand our position. we have a plan for every eventuality, and we will do what is necessary to prevent such a move by russia in such a case. our response will be decisive. well, and in approximately the same spirit, secretary of state anthony blenki

he stated that the united states is actively involved in discussing the possibilities of transportingssing russia through the caspian sea, and that when next week secretary of state anthony blinkin holds a 5 + 1 meeting within the framework of the un general assembly, that is, the united states plus the countries of central asia here for me it donald. lou, strangely with central asia, will declare a commitment to maintaining even closer relations with the united states, but angeli kaur, the official representative of the usa international development agency, went even further, who formulated the goal of american policy in the region as follows. listen washington is currently taking action to

let's remember that united states supported the group in 2016. that was actually what opened the door to boston our to win election in 2018 . he made brazil, which lack, which is the most important regional platform for latin america and the caribbean in region. 19. he actually is not supporting brakes as he should, and of course all of this is just benefits united states. but the thing is that was not, is also trans supporters. so with bite in, in the white house, he's been a little bit ambiguous about us. and so the us about him and also both sonata, we won the election because lula was in jail. right. and i mean was in jail because of the direct interference of f. b i. and part of just is supporting the judge who made this cause was a fraud already recognized by the supreme court? i mean, they should have used these nomic levers in 2016 right. when do my was over through by a cool that actually now it's approved by congress that she didn't do anything wrong, legally or, or in terms of the constitution. so, but actually both your opinion and un

the united states is committed to israel security. and a negotiated two state solution remains in our view the best way to ensure there is security and prosperity for the future of the palestinian state which they are entitled. both sides fully respect the political weight of their citizens. we also urge every nation to commit to strengthen the nonproliferation regime. no matter what else is happening in the world, the united states is ready to pursue critical arms control measures. a nuclear war cannot be won and must never be fought. five permanent members of the security council reaffirmed that commitment in january. but today you are seeing disturbing trends. russia shunned the nonproliferation ideals at the 10th npt review conference. today as i said they are making irresponsible nuclear threats. china is conducting an unprecedented concerning nuclear buildup. despite our efforts to begin serious and sustained diplomacy, the democratic people's republic continues to violate u.n. sanctions. while the united states is prepared for a

>> with the united states? yes. >> as i said i think later on there will be some contact at the united nations also. it's important. our role is important. usaid is very crucial. i'm so we hope we are in touch with u.s. administration. we would also hope to have some support from the u.s. congress. the u.s. congress is sovereign here and they make their own decisions. we have sensitize the congressional leadership. the chairpersons of the relevant committees. we are in touch with them. our community members are in touch with them. so they know the situation is very bad. scores of congressmen and senators have sent their messages across to the people of pakistan. similarly i would say the governors of many states have sent messages. mayors, police chiefs have expressed their solidarity with the people of pakistan. with strong ties with the united states. any opening remarks she said pakistan in the united states are strong allies. that is true. we have had the steadfast relationship. and i think in this dark hou

it is also very important and we remember the precedent when the united states did not go to any publicarning against its ally in 2008 . in august 2008. i mean, georgia and mikheil saakashvili yes, then at the public level then secretary of state condoleezza rice said that the united states does not abandon its allies, and we do not know what was said on a non-public level, but it is quite obvious that mikheil saakashvili interpreted these signals as carte blanche and did what he did, and there it is. in my opinion, the risk that now could happen is something that i am a very real danger absolutely right, but there is more. here i am in moscow for uh 3 weeks and talked to a variety of people. with people who work in decision makers with people who are experts and with ordinary people. i will be very surprised. if you the foreseeable future will not be very cool. the radical and understandable russian response to what happened in kharkov to what happened in moscow, i mean, was given by dugin and much more. and i have a feeling from my conversations. well, my instincts are here. and what

it was passed unanimously by the united states. e now introduce legislation that would require it be designated state sponsor of terrorism and i it would be adopted as well both the senate and in the house by the same bipartisan majority. it would tightenen the sanctions and the high-end consequence for russia but also permit actions to be brought in the course of the united states against russia and others. there would be civilian action but i wonder if you could talk through the additional legal consequences to russia if it designated as a state-sponsored terrorism. >> thank you senator. i know all americans share the revulsion in the wake of the ghastly crimes that were perpetrated by russian forces by ukraine and continue to be perpetrated. as for the terrorism question, that is beyond my experience or purview at the department of justice. what i knowes is that it is ordinarily the secretary of state makes the determination to add a country to the list of state sponsor of terrorism. as far as consequences are concerned, our work

politics in the united states, the situation.ll it a dead end. i would call this situation a political civil war, because there is such a degree of bitterness and enmity between democrats and republicans, as we are seeing now. it seems to me that since the fifties and sixties of the xix century, there was no eve of the civil war in in the united states today, joe biden is supposed to speak, and in philadelphia's independence hall, that is, in the very place and in the very hall where the declaration of independence was signed and the constitution was yes, and uh, the meaning of his speech is clear. actually, he has already announced in some speeches. what he will talk about, he will say that the most important threat to the survival of america for the soul of america for its democracy for the rights and freedoms of americans for the political system of the country are the republicans are donald trump his movements my commerica great agen, and whom biden called semi-fascists, and for a moment, donald trump, according to a public o

he knew it was the united states. i think in this case, we just go to the one party you actually made a confession. that's the united states. president joe biden february, 8th of this year. stating very clearly that if russia were to send forces into ukraine, that united states would shut down the north stream to pipeline. and when asked why he could do how he could do that, it wasn't as a german ally, et cetera. he said, we'll shut it down. it appears that joe biden is, in this case, at least a man of his word. there's no other party that you know that a would have the political clout to carry this out in be have the incentive of, you know, the united states was confronted with the fact that the german people were beginning to rebel against the u. s. dictated policies that were being implemented by the german government regarding your russian energy, not purchasing russian gas, et cetera. and we're going to demand that the north stream to pipeline be opened up so that they wouldn't freeze to death this winter. and by

i think that unless the united states i united kingdom or is the key when the government drops, of the idea of pushing russia out, the nuclear danger will remain. because it is absolutely great, it is crystal clear that it is affordable for them. if i, what do you think they mean by pushing rationale, rushing sewage country a way where north could it couldn't be push the, you cannot and you're going to put it on the, on the moon. so how, you know, that's the boy, you know, president still ask you of your grade, your state, you will continue to fight unless you read takes all the ukrainian land with the mind in mind. you're wrong, waters. americans are apparently and openly a groovy disperse. right? i am, it is absolutely clear that it is impossible to drive russia out through traditional military needs. this is why they turn to nuclear terrorism and the threat of nuclear terrorism as a mean, you know, to try to push russia out in this way. this is why i think the danger will remain unless they change the political purpose of their oh, their post. you know, i tried to follow political d

in the end, they were, uh, seriously in the interest of the united states it dragged on for a long timen june 15, 2014 , us president barack obama ordered american troops to intervene in iraq in order to fight against the islamic state of iraq terrorist organization elevators or for short, and the anthem of this organization is banned in russia and a number of other countries. today it is obvious that the very emergence of isis was a direct consequence of the actions of the united states that began after the terrorist attacks on 11 september. the appearance of the isis was the result of the e- intervention of the united states in iraq, which began in 2003, then, as you know, the regime was demolished from adam hussein and a huge number of people who once made up the elite of this sunni regime, who formed the basis of various army structures and even the bass party in overnight , they were out of the political process, at least, because the united states of america provided support to the shiites. it happened in 2003 when the americans invaded iraq but remember this famous story when the

ambassador made tonight russia in the united states anatoly antonov, who commented on the recent statement by the secretary of state of the united states in linkin that washington is not against the use of western weapons by kiev in those territories that russia will very soon read its own by them, and today the deputy head of the presidential administration of russia sergey kiriyenko said that nato is fighting against russia using ukraine as a springboard, we will discuss the prospects for american policy and the risks of escalation with the president of the center for national interest dmitry simes, who is located in washington dmitry good evening good evening dmitry well , here is dmitry. as you can see from all the quotes from the statements that i re- uh cited, in russia there is indeed a growing belief that the united states of nato is either becoming or is already a party to this military conflict, the nature of which will change, but judging by the fact that recently said secretary of state blinkin, and judging by the fact that today the pentagon announced a new one and one billion

what's your current status living in the united states right now? so after the one month, so when the beach has came to the to the other one. yeah. so they finished, i came to the genia. and then back time i said one month, one month and welcome from center in virginia. i'm trying to finish my paper work even by my cheek and other things. so i love it hard for all the local country we love like it'll probably be everything all of us. she said like will be a crappy buddy talk to like, you know, for michelle or our paperwork. so now i think there's also the hospital, those people who are living in camps like they are, they don't have like, you know, that i to go outside of the camp and they are in the ration. and also they are really well. and they don't know what's happened, the future. oh, rich country where i kept them, i'm the list. i think they had like the use for not bring them to the united states . i'm trying to put the properties and also many of the children and also show that they are deprived of the school and they don't know what happene

it isn't the united states. thank you. sure m f c, i thank the representative of the state for that statement. there are no more speakers on the list before adjourning for more on this. let's cross lived your investigative journalist, edward saul. edward is great to have you on the program today. now we heard a little bit of back and forth there when it came to the representative for russia and a rep for the united states. both of them accusing each other of different things and denying the accusations that they were making to one another. so what do you make of that back and forth, especially when you have the u. s saying that russia is throwing out conspiracy theories and then you have russia throwing out statements that were made by the u. s. president himself. well, i think that's exactly what they've said in regard to supporting terrorism and syria and iraq police operation. and also category we did not so town and united states apparatus for the beginning of the war and terrorism center . i was a symmetric war agains

, it reacted ambassador of the united states to ukraine bridget bring she said that the united es will never recognize these fictitious referendums that russia plans to hold and that they will never recognize the supposedly annexed territories of ukraine as russian territories, she also condemned russia's mobilization plans and said that the united states will support ukraine and in the future, as long as it will be necessary, she mentioned that such calls by vladimir putin are a manifestation of weakness, similar statements have also been heard from officials of the national security council of the united states, in particular and jake sally, she and john kirby they said that these steps are not really the steps of a confident country or the steps of a country that is a strong soviet or vice versa and this is a sign that russia is failing, failing in particular on the battlefield today, the coordinator of strategic of communications and the national security council, john kirby, in an interview with the ab channel, he really said that, sir, mobilizing 300,000 new military perso

the united states is committed to israel's security full stop. negotiated two-state solution remains in our view the best way to insure israel's security and prosperity for the future and give the palestinians the state which they are entitled. both sides to fully respect the equal rights of their citizens. both people enjoying equal measure of freedom and dignity. let me also urge every nation to recommit to strengthening a nuclear non-proliferation regime through diplomacy. no matter what else is happening in the world, the united states is ready to pursue critical arms control measures. a nuclear war cannot be won and must never be fought. five permanent thembers of the security council reaffirmed that commitment in january but today we're seeing disturbing trends. russia shunned the non-proliferation ideals embraced by every other nation at the 10th npt review conference. today as i said we're making irresponsible nuclear threats to use nuclear weapons. china is conducting an unprecedented concerning nuclear build-up without any transparency.

it is a very a now not only constructive voice of international community, which is united states and it's colleagues and friends around the world. we in asia, we have japan and now does the dominant be in the western hemisphere. but unfortunately, united nation doesn't have tools to, you know, to somehow impose its will on the united states, which is the most powerful country in the world. we what we can go back to the fact that unit had in the united states invaded iraq, even though the coffee and what's against that. so whenever we hear about the, you and charter, the russia should come. why would you in charge that we should, you know, ask i was so how many times united states has broken the you like to talk to you and talk to so, sorry, so, so this is double standards. i mean, you can, you know, require from other countries to comply with you and chart the, although they require, but not applying the same rules and laws to your so, and this is what, what, what the united states is doing. we've been hearing about this multi polar world or more democratic governance for quite some

united states is commit to do israel's security, full stop, and a negotiated two-state solution remains, in our view, the best was to ensure prosperity and give the palestinians a state to which they are entitled. both sides to fully respect the equal rights of their citizens, both people enjoying equal measure of freedom and security. let me also urge every nation to strengthen the nonproliferation through diplomacy. no matter what else is happening in the world were the united states is ready to pursue critical arms control measures. a nuclear war cannot be won. it must never be fought. with the five permanent members of the security council just reaffirmed that commitment in january, but today we are seeing disturbing trends. at the 10th ntp review conference. again, as i said, they're making irresponsible threats to use nuclear weapons. china is unconducting an unprecedented nuclear buildup without any transparency. despite our efforts to begin seriously sustained diplomacy, the democratic people's republic continuing to -- white the united states is prepared for a mutual return to

united states introduced a call to action. a roadmap, eliminated global food insecurity to eliminate the global food insecurity. that more than $100.00 nation member states have already supported in june, the g 7 announced more than $4500000000.00 to strengthen food security around the world. 3 usa i. d, 's. 3, the future initiative, united states as scaling up innovative ways to get drought, and heat resistance seeds into the hands of farmers who need them while distributing fertilizer and improving fertilizer fisheries show that farmers can grow more while using less. and we're calling on all countries to refrain from banding food, exports or hoarding grain. so many people are suffering because in every country in the world, no matter what else divides us and parents can not feed their children, nothing, nothing else matters. the parents cannot feed their children as we look to the future. org with our partners to update and create rules of the road for new challenges, we face the 21st century. we launch the train technology

pay attention, because the united states, the american elite considered the confrontation with china ng other things, to unite the divided society. it doesn’t work out about this either. quite right, urlun writes, and the way out, that is, sergeevich is still a very difficult way out. you speak correctly when you need to always create an enemy. this system worked, the enemy of society is being created and is being consolidated. and now an amazing situation. like democrats so republicans say we're tired from external enemies, i want us to be given unknown countries, for which we pay when we conducted surveys, than simple. probably every one of the educated americans could at least show on the map where ukraine is located. we perfectly remember the situation in the eighth year, when people came out with weapons and said georgia was attacked, but understandable. it was absolutely critical. but now we see that this crisis that begins in america did not exist. never the founding fathers, when they created a two-port system, they have a huge role, assigned to the chambers a huge role to the