yesterday, the united states secretary of state very unambiguously reminded me of a pancake, speaking university. listen to his performance. from our point of view, there is now a competition for the shape of the world order, what will be the next period of history after the cold war, whose values ​​​​will be reflected in our simple choice and it became obvious after the second world war that the world does not organize itself for the united states such a choice, if we do not participate in the organization of the world order, if we do not if we play a leadership role, then one of two things will happen, or someone else will play this role, for example, china and it will probably play it in a way that would not coincide with our interests and values, or even worse, the leader’s place will be empty. in that case, there will be a vacuum that the bad things can fill before the good things fill in, so we would like to participate in this, we would like to lead the process and understand what these good things are and how they can benefit us. that's how it is in american the world is not h

the united states and russia.ere's a bulletin of atomic scientists has brought the doomsday clock to it than 100 seconds of midnight. it began at seven minutes to midnight. we are now at 100 seconds. the reason the bulletin of atomic scientists gives for this is the unilateral withdrawal by the united states from basically the entire architecture of arms control with russia in particular. so there has got to be pressure on the biden administration, not only to back off and allow zelenskyy and putin to talk, to allow them to have some kind of peace agreement that is filled with dignity for all sides, but also the united states needs to go back to the table with the russians and talk to them. if united states can talk to the saudis, why can't they talk to the russians? it is ridiculous to say the russians are not a good partner, they're not going to standby agreements. look who is talking. the united states is the country that unilaterally walked away from the iran nuclear deal. it was stop the iranians, it was the

as a major upheaval, i or major threat can only come to the united states from within the united states rather than from the outside. but they look at the behavior of many of the american allies, including some of the oil producing arab countries. for example, saudi arabia and i'm not even mentioning countries like china, india, south africa, many of their latin american countries. they're not taking sides, but they're clearly not excited about the american hegemony. because for very pragmatic reasons subscribing to anyone's hegemony at this point of time when you need sovereignty as a means of making decisions, it's not just an abstract and constant construction, but it's a way of functioning in them and predictable world. they don't seem to be buying that concept anymore. do you think gemini is sustainable in the world today? not in the mind of american the leads, but within the global community as well, within part of the global community. yes. that, that part of the community will include europe, that thought of the community will include other america, now lies in what they call th

the united states is put before a fact, but to try to draw the united states into where the united statesnot want to be drawn in, and you quite rightly noted the application for ukraine's entry into nato bypassing the stage, and partner of the hr membership action plan and, of course, today's is just an infernal statement zelensky that the west and the united states should launch a preventive nuclear strike on russia. that is, he calls for a global total nuclear war. well, in fact, the problem lies in the fact that such behavior was quite common in the history of international relations, but on the part of the satellites, when the satellites really tried, realizing their own interests, to drag their patrons into the war. ah, and force their patrons, but to realize the interests of the satellites. at the same time, they did not correspond to the interests of the patrons in during the cold war, there were a lot of such situations, and by the way, both moscow and washington then found the political will and wisdom to prevent such escalations and pull their satets in time. but here's another

and again, logically speaking, one way to the united states and maybe the only way to the, to the united states from supporting your current to the level when that support can make a strategic difference for russia would be to strengthen. did ponce now, how do you strengthen because you basically strengthen and by saying that, you know, in certain circumstances, but we will not be hitting at ukraine will be hitting elsewhere. and that shared the so, but people of, so basically the idea was not to try to suggest russian needs to know hip united states with a nuke. the idea was to strengthen to tons the foundation of peace as we know it. and it's interesting that most of the western decision makers, when they make statements about rush as possible, use of nuclear weapons, they need focus on tactical strikes upon ukraine. they never met, even conceive of russia being able to reach their own homelands. do you think that said deflection on their part, or do they honestly believe that given russia's potential and those people in the know they know of fresh as nuclear potential? they know that

that has led to colds for the united states to decouple. in other words, disentangle itself from china, but it's not realistic. if the united states tried to de couple entirely from china, it would be very harmful to our economy. it would probably be harmful to our innovation. it would just have other economies industries step in where the united states stepped out. so it wouldn't work. decoupling probably wouldn't be a very good idea for china either. china also knows that its larger economic faith lives with the rest of the world. and even though it has this tense relationship with united states and others, it is you know, most of its economic growth. it's been dependent on globalization with the rest of the world. it needs to find a way to balance those things. at the beginning of this video, we asked whether we're at the dawn of a new global economic age. is the case of a us versus a chinese lead system. the differences are major. the market lead system of the u. s. favors the lack of government intervention that chinese system favors h

it would just have other economies industries step in where the united states stepped out. so it wouldn't work. decoupling probably wouldn't be a very good idea for china either. china also knows that its larger economic faith lives with the rest of the world. and even though it has this tense relationship with the united states and others, it is you know, most of it's academic growth that's been dependent on globalization with the rest. the world needs to find a way to balance those things. at the beginning of this video, we are whether we're at the dawn of a new global economic age. if it's a case of a us versus a chinese lead system, the differences are major. the market lead system of the u. s. favors a lack of government intervention that chinese system favors had the state involvement. ah, they have reinvigorated support for state enterprises really focused on indigenous using technology. achieving, trying to achieve self reliance, not done what previous leaders have done and trying to manage and maintain a healthier constructive relationship with the united states an

it is obvious that the hegemony policy pursued by the united states is different. we have n’t seen it in the world yet, which means it’s obvious that it was almost chinese-style direct, and there was no such condemnation of the policies of western countries before. that is, it’s obvious that sino-american relations have reached another historical bottom. the day after the closing of the congress, according to tradition, the first plenum of the central committee of the twentieth convocation. they will already appoint a new composition of the politburo and its standing committee, in fact, the party and political elite, which will govern the country for the next five years, experts believe that the leader of the prc tingping will again be nominated for a third term as general secretary of the cpc and chairman of the central military council the predecessors of the current head of china spent two five-year terms in the highest office, but in 2018 the country's constitution was amended from that moment on, all restrictions on the duration leaders in power in the prc hav

we are grateful for his numerous contributions that helped protect and the constitution of the united states against all enemies. we celebrate that he helped our nation navigate through world war two. we we're thankful for the truman doctrine the berlin airlift, the creation of the united nations and the end of racial segregation in the united states armed forces that occurred during his presidency. lord, you brought him from humble beginnings and used even his setbacks to provide him stepping stones to greater use in inspired by his note of all life, give us the wisdom to permit our reach to exceed our grasp for courage, creativity and commitment we pray in your sovereign. amen. ladies and, gentlemen, please take your seats. ladies and gentlemen, the honorable pelosi, speaker of the united states house of representatives. now, this is what you all came for. now it is special honor to invite word president truman's clifton truman daniel and his wife, polly and thomas. daniel alex burden and dr. kurt graham of the truman library institute, members of the missouri delegation, both and senate.

however, we heard the representative of the united states completely flat out, deny that the united states is in any way involved with biological weapons or research involving the use of biological materials and biological agents for military purposes. many countries spoke about why it is very, very important to make sure that biological weapons and weapons of mass destruction are not use. the representative of china. emphasize that de escalation and negotiation was the best way to move toward ending the conflict in ukraine, as well as talking about the importance of opposing biological weapons from the organ she did as a country who suffered immensely from biological weapons during world war 2. in china stands for a complete prohibition of weapons of destruction including biological ones. the information on biological military activity released by russia deserves the corresponding response by the party's concern. china's position on the conflict in ukraine is clear. we expect to cease fire and call on parties for negotiation and dialogue. however, the specific words of the u. s. seemed to

the cherokee nation, united states and then the state governments. often, it's like a ferments pushing the hardest with the u.s. acting then as the power that will step in, negotiate removal treaties and accomplish the deportation of native americans. >> one of the things that you have done in your work that is so interesting is after this period that we are talking about, native americans are removed for most all intensive purposes, at least here in georgia. i know that there are strong bands of the eastern cherokee's, but here in georgia. whites form over this territory. we see the spread of african american slavery into this. it becomes part of the cotton kingdom in some ways and becomes an important part of the history of the 19th century georgia, but then one of the really interesting things about it is that georgians also eventually began to embrace the idea of remembering and telling the story of what happened to the cherokee. it's always portrayed as a tragedy. it's always portrayed as you pointed out, as something to do with injustice, and e

united states towards russia weakens the ability of the united states to engage in dialogue.e russia with china with those countries that differ from the united states and declares that they are not ready to turn into something similar to some kind of similarity. and the united states that's it really. a very big problem. and i don't think uh before the united states can sort out its internal problems and somehow glue it back together. american society somehow find some unifying principle and overcome stupid-political civil war that exists in the united states now. i do not think that american foreign policy can change qualitatively, but towards greater realism and greater acceptance of the multipolar reality that is being formed before our eyes. and this is a very serious problem. this is a serious problem. well, i wouldn't exaggerate. well, if you like, uh, the strength of this russophobic position is inherent in a certain part of the american globalist establishment. uh, this uh does not prevent globalists from seizing leadership positions in politics. but when they take t

i mean the united states of russia and , uh, the united states.ingly obvious and vital issue as for a conflict, as the prevention of a direct military clash, because we understand even the threat of escalation in different ways, because the dialogue between russia and the united states resembles a conversation of a deaf person in the last few weeks, when russia directly text says that the threat lies precisely in a direct military clash between russia and nato as a result. american arms supplies to ukraine, which are acquiring an increasingly large-scale and more and more sophisticated character. while the united states is talking about russia's alleged readiness to use tactical nuclear weapons in ukraine, the absolute thing is what is called in english miss match yes, that is, really a conversation between the deaf and the blind. and even in this matter there is de-conflict. it is very difficult for us to agree with each other, but it is even more difficult for us to agree on content not on deconfluxing. therefore, how to properly regulate the uk

again, the shiites opposed the alliance of the authorities of the united states after 5 years, the battles from local places to all regions of the state, the conflict entered the history as a war of all against all in 2015, the houthi rebels kidnapped the head of the administration of the president of yemen and occupied the palace to the end month, the president resigned, and yesterday's butchers created a revolutionary committee, a transitional government on february 26, 2015, a coalition of arab forces, with the natural support of the united states, entered yemen, but began to help the rebels. iran, and the west did not present the operation as an invasion. but as a defense against the yemeni interventionists, although in fact the houthis waged a war for independence from the united states and neighbors, but the principle of washington is everywhere the same, whoever is not with us is against us, the western powers led by the united states during the telete of their hegemony introduced into circulation and accustomed the world to their own political concepts, political language, which mo

and russia, because article 5 of the nato charter directly obliges the united states to defendny nato ally, so kiev's statement brought confusion even to the ranks of the democratic party. us speaker of the house nancy refused to support the initiative. the republic of nicaragua announced the termination of diplomatic relations with the netherlands the country's foreign ministry emphasizes that the kingdom's colonial policy is offensive . earlier, the authorities of the republic declared the eu ambassador persona non grata. will receive a new us ambassador who said he supports the use of any tool to change the political course. nicaraguan authorities also stated that latin america needs to turn towards eurasia and strengthen cooperation with russia

and the meanwhile in the west farther north the united states and england were both laying claim to the oregon territory. so if you want to imagine the modern states of idaho and washington and oregon, but also british columbia up to up to the end of the southern panhandle of alaska. that's that's the oregon territory and they were sharing it which is fairly rare. that is a jointly occupied the orient territory. and if either one of them was good at no longer want to jointly occupy and draw borderline somewhere. they had to give the other one a year's notice. the mexicans living in new mexico and in california depended on american trade for manufactured goods and the government's depended on that trade for for revenue. the mexican officials there. there was very loose control if any between those places and and mexico city where the government is. so what's what's spain had believed and then and then later mexico believed that in order to control what they called the northern frontier. what becomes the the us southwest that that's so far from the capital at mexico. they needed to settle

the united states in the conditions of the energy crisis hastily transferred european production. production resources are all that the united europe has been accumulating and developing for decades. the inhabitants of europe are left alone with their problems, but no one cares across the ocean that europe is expecting a very dark, cold and long winter. now listen to what about this same act of hybrid war and international terrorism, said the president of the united states joe byte. a lot of people ask me about the pipeline and i'll tell you what, it was a sabotage and now the russians are spreading disinformation. we are working with our allies to find out exactly what happened and at my direction have already begun to help our allies to strengthen the protection of this critical infrastructure at the right time, when everything calms down, we will send divers to find out exactly what happened we are not sure yet we know, but do not listen to what putin says, we know that this is not true. i think it's brilliant. we don't know what happened yet, but don't listen to putin because

at least the fact that in europe the united states does not have tactical nuclear weapons. there is the most low-power bomb, which is in the us nuclear warehouses of the us army, only this is one megane. this is not a tactical nuclear weapon, but a tactical nuclear weapon - this is one and a half 10 kt-10 klotons, which the russian armed forces have this weaponry and that’s all, and therefore bend this topic about the use of non-use, what you scan and they even try to remember how not -no, russia will attack, well attacked created the principle of a special operation that allowed it to within the framework of some military operations to resolve their security issues. i would like to add that hmm the behavior of western countries. it is not just the unconscious conscious that we see it is the conscious escalation of the conflict in europe. the united states of america is extremely interested that this conflict not only last. not only longer, uh, the stakes in this conflict were raised, but so that as many european countries as possible, as many and as deep as possible in thi

about enough, i still cannot pronounce the acronym which replaced enough, whatever it is, the united statesanada, mexico. if this became frankly it north america economic union and to that you added what's called thi principle economies of asia and japan, india, australia and you added germany, france, united kingdom. this is a very big combined economic entity. it was effectively a single market goods for capitol and technology in the population, people often assume china is one huge critical mass which you and i both know it isn't set of and rapid aging. hundred million mexicans and 50 million canadians around 600 million people. rapidly agingn population. it is just a middle to upper income level. it is not necessarily written it the stars second largest economy in the world depending on how you manage it. >> fascinating. thank you for this wonderful conversation. your important book, pleasure to talk with you today. >> thank you so much for the opportunity to be on c-span. i hope people buy the book, read it and tell me what they think. ♪ c-span is your unfiltered view of government. we

and the idea that the united states believes that there's a future in selling l and g to the united states as i to, to europe and, and you're not going to be bailed out either by mythology of us allergy, even steepest possible price control, clearly clearly and none of these people the thought, any of this are, you know, larry, what are future historians get to think about this? i mean, this is all self inflicted. these are craving choices. these none of this should be happening larry. some airy parallels if you will, with the 1st world war, because when you look back at the health, the world got drugged in europe in particular, was drug into a completely unnecessary massive slaughter. there are the historians will look back at this period and see a complete failure of leadership across the board, an unnecessary provocation of russia and refusal to negotiate and, and in the end, it will, this is going to lead to, unfortunately widespread pain. i think das destruction, i don't mean to be a doom say or but it just, the future is dark in what we're looking at because the leaders are refusing

that is a steadfast longtime partner of the united states. but now we're seeing the circles of power in washington, turning on them pretty rapidly in response to recent moves around opec people will recall the words of former us president george w bush, who said you're either with us or against us. and that kind of thinking seems to be prevailing in washington dc. why can't the by get american oil companies to increase the output? they just won't do it. because american oil companies are doing is raising prices at home to make up for this slowing of demand. well, it's the same thing that the saudis and opec are doing globally, you know, negotiate is going on right now between us, well, companies and biden, about exporting oil from the u. s. to europe. so, you know, that's going to cause more of a supply problem, u. s. and raise prices, even more. prices are going up faster. the u. s. a. partly because the oil companies are shutting down the refineries. you know, they're not, they're having these a regular maintenance and then there's the so c

now, at this point, what can the united states do? but rant and rave at the saudis for not doing what they want. hear some of what we've heard, what saudi arabia did to help putin continue to wage his despicable, vicious war against ukraine will long be remembered by americans. we are looking at all the legislative tools to best deal with this appalling and deeply cynical action. though the no peck bill is up for discussion, this is a bill that would allow the united states to sue opec countries take them to court, possibly have you escort, seize their assets. if they don't do what the united states wants, it would allow civil actions against opec countries by the united states in retaliation for move such as this, that bill is up for discussion. in addition to that, the military relationship between the united states and saudi arabia is being questioned. this is what's been said as well. i just don't see any good reason for us to maintain troops that are there almost solely for the purpose of protecting their oil fields. and their se

it's the second world war that pulled united states into the world that makes the united states a global power, that engaged the united states the affairs of the world. it is a conclusion of the makers of american policy. after 1945 that the us has to act very seriously, very in a sort of creatively to prevent a world war three, to prevent a third world war. first world war was very costly for europe, for the united states for the world, second world war was immeasurably costly. the us paid a huge price, maybe not quite the price numerically of the soviet union, but it paid a huge price for the second world war. and so the lodestar of american foreign policy, the driving impulse of foreign policy is no world war three. we need to something better. we need to have a different system mind. we need to have a different state of affairs. where do the first two world wars begin? they begin in europe. they are european wars. what's the american as to why these wars begin is that you have too little democracy, the one hand and too little deliberation cooperation on the other hand. it is necessar

, and the united states of america at that time.nd they wanted to establish friendly relations with the arab countries, and in order to reduce the influence of the soviet union these states, this is certainly support, which the soviet union gave gamal to abdelnasar in this crisis, that famous ultimatum to khrushchev. he, of course, frightened the european countries of israel , including forcing the united states to more actively negotiate with its allies, and in order to withdraw troops from it as soon as possible, and then to agree on a peaceful settlement of this issue. in moscow, khrushchev, who was then chairman of the council of ministers, said that a million soviet volunteers were ready to go to egypt in order to beat the british french israelis. and what is a million soviet volunteers yes, this is an army, it’s not volunteers, it’s just regular soviet troops that would be transferred to egypt and would disperse this entire expeditionary anglo-french corps, if the volunteers go to fight in egypt to support a local revolution,

, when as far as saying that the united states has no biological weapons program, the united states does not have a biological weapons program. there are no ukrainian biological weapons laboratories supported by the united states. it is widely acknowledged by many voices in mainstream us medium that the pentagon is involved in activities concerning biological weapons. however, we heard the representative of the united states completely flat out, deny that the united states is in any way involved with biological weapons or research involving the use of biological materials and biological agents for military purposes. many countries spoke about why it is very, very important to make sure that biological weapons and weapons of mass destruction are not use. the representative of china emphasized that de escalation and negotiation was the best way to move toward ending the conflict in ukraine, as well as talking about the importance of opposing biological weapons from, from the organ. and she did as a country who suffered immensely from biological weapons during world war 2. in china sta

this is a war between russia and the united states. to milan are made, it comes to last should get the nin cowboys. america forces are in europe, not in europe. engage in conflict with russian forces. the american forces are hearing, defend nato allies. nato escalates even more indiscretion. military operations become a war, though when you put the dell sips of that will.

they are in the united states. this doesn't look so different from the regime change and i think that the 3, the 1st ca regime change ever which happened to be in iran against the democratically elected prime minister, mom and most dad. and they used very similar tactics being used today. the us does, we do things to support, you know, other people's aspirations. they don't do do things or american aspirations. and that's all for now. be sure to check out our t dot com for all the latest breaking news and updates. we'll see you right back here at the top of the hour with with tony, welcome to worlds apart. the 60th anniversary of the cuban missile crisis which fell this month might have been of interest only to specialists historians if it weren't for the renewed confrontation between moscow and washington. with the threat of nuclear strikes, making a come back into the public consciousness. can we still learn anything from the way the 2 nations dealt with potentially apocalyptic animosity back in 962? well, to dis

the main function of the united states is to save the country from war . the americans were waiting for the diplomats to finally return to their homes and sleep peacefully in the soviet embassy, ​​did they forget whether this night was justified? i will say this, if you can't sleep at night, this job is not for you. we were in a state of alarm. and i am no less sleep. i was sure that we would solve everything in a day or two. although i didn’t know how it was, and when i woke up, after 6 hours there was already a telegram from moscow at 4 o’clock in the afternoon on october 28 i received an urgent telegram from the gram of a consideration that robert kennedy expressed on behalf of the president, they find understanding in moscow today on the radio there will be a donat answer to the president's address of october 27, and this answer will not be the most positive soon after receiving this telegram. i felt great relief. october 28, 1962 in the newspaper, the truth was published another statement. taz, in particular, said the minister of defense of the ussr i

so the united states gave money to create squads to combat drug trafficking.death squadrons were created with this money, the purpose of which was to hunt down the opposition and anti-american sentiments , it was these mercenaries who provoked shooting on the border with peru, a country that also shoots a lot of oil. it turned into a real war for the disputed territory. while the dead were strangely counted, the united states was counting the earnings from black gold quotes, the oilman of ecuador. moment completely departed uncle. sam in the country began to swim. billionaires complete chaos and total corruption washington's feint helped lead to the worst economic collapse in the history of ecuador. but they got a lease on a place for a military base. this fact will have an impact already in 2006. american aid very often turns to harm, because the support of governments affiliated with america. uh, in political interests leads to several things. the first is the rampant corruption of plunder. this help, the second thing you need to understand is that this is h

the united states must acknowledge the simple fact that ukraine ultimately do whatever the united states wants to do. that's the simple fact for better for worse, that's the way it is. we are not controlled by mr. lensky. mrs. laskey ultimately is controlled by us. so there's no way in the world that the u. s. should be acting on every statement is mrs. lensky makes, and they certainly should not be acting on statements they could lead to rapid escalation and nuclear war. well, let's leave it at that. thank you very much for your time, and congratulations on the book. thank you. and thank you for watching cold to see her again on will the part ah with mm ah, i mean with, [000:00:00;00] with many in the west and ukraine celebrating the explosion on the crimean bridge. russia slums, the reaction as revealing to quote the terrorist nature of the kiev regime and is nato partners. pavilion areas up the next remain under ukrainian shelling as a local school is hits and the attacks on the store is the shape. the news this week, us lawmakers, slums, saudi arabia, royal back stabbers, following t

juggling second moment on ukraine for many years, by the way, this was about the democrats of the united states uh, kerry was the secretary of state, american policy was built, they spoke about it publicly on the information they receive in the context of the situation in donbass from social networks. the same same story with the malaysian boeing , everything that was connected with accusations of russia of using it. there, illegal means and so on on the territory of ukraine, links endlessly went to social networks, an american delegation came and spoke. we charge you with this in this in this in this question. and where is the very texture with which we could work, if we are talking, for example, and some information that was worth checking, they say, like where in social networks. and yet you dmitry also said a fantastic thing. according to, well, i don’t know, representatives of some politically influential corps of the thirteenth year, there were not enough materials, there were not enough materials for a full-scale investigation, the information received from russia was not so deep reason

the united states put up with a rise of jihadist state in northeastern syria right from the early dayse this from the documents that have been given out through wikileaks. the dia, defense intelligence agency for example already in 2012 said that it was the purpose, it was the intention of the west, turkey and the gulf states to allow an islamic state of some kind to rise up and northeast in order to pressure, to use it as leverage against assad. and we see this time and time again in the american documents. already in 2013 for example, the number two and the cia gave us one single interview on tv and he said that the way they were going to get rid of assad by building up the opposition and they said already the opposition is dominated by al qaeda and related militias. so what they wanted to do was build them up to a weaken the syrian army but they were terrified of destroying the syrian army because we would need the syrian military and the institutions of the syrian security forces are required to defeat al qaeda when this is done. so they wanted to weaken the syrian army, force the

and he called the approach of officials in the united states to solving some of the world's problems machiavellian states and nato does not care how many ukrainians die civilians women. children soldiers, we still have it turned into some kind of football game. we don't care. how many participants playing for our money will be crippled on the field. the main thing is that we win now we supply a fantastic amount of weapons. and this led to the fact that the rating that produces rockets and norb. grunman, who creates rocket planes, all these defense companies began to receive super-profits and bloat from the dollar. eduard lozansky was among those who tried to bring russia closer to the united states in the early nineties . there, those who are called the back channel people's diplomat since the eighty- eighth year, eduard dmitrievich helped organize the visit of the us delegation, later connected insiders from washington, the founder of the harrytech polaricho fund, here he directly contacted bush senior and urged the white house to develop a plan for integration with russia that the s

i often think in the united states, and particularly in the united states congress, there iy a confusionbetween operational and american strategy. we would be a lot more advanced, both the united states and as u.s. allies, in our dealings with the people's republic of china if 95% of the focus was on the clarity and consistency of our operational behavior and its consistency with the coherent strategy of deterrence asit opposed to what i would describe as this continued rhetorical to -- detraction to what we put into our strategy about e the chinese everyday of the week. furthermore, if the emphasis is on the clarity side residentt operational side then you create all sorts of opportunities to cause offense, cultural offense and the rest which frankly clouds out your ability to do with the extensive issues of the day. i have a deeply realistic view of how you deal with leninist. those of us who come from social democratic parties like i do by the way for 100 years since the second international in the 1880s we'll dealt with thee' problem of communist parties whether in europe or the unit

we also understand that if there is a direct military clash between russia and the united states, it e very difficult to prevent an escalation in the nuclear level, nevertheless, it is openly stated. on the admissibility and expediency of striking in russia, the destruction of the black sea fleet, and so on, moreover, on absolutely far-fetched, but on the pretext as if supposedly, but the readiness of russia to use tactical nuclear weapons in ukraine, which absolutely does not fit into the logic or the letter e of the russian nuclear doctrine of anatoly ivanovich here. how would you comment on such statements by the united states at the embassy, ​​we noticed that in recent days. the rhetoric of the speeches of american former politicians has become very sharply toughened, and i emphasize that many publications have appeared, in the media , which talk about a possible decapitating strike on the kremlin, by the way, it is surprising that this publication was made by wiki and was not very noticed by russians. and i think that it is very serious when they talk about the murder, in fact, t

we've seen what happened to ran out. imagining that the united states is dangerous, and when the united states was using and this is public record, ukrainian territory to pump arms their to sunday and military advisors. what other means? we, as a nation, had to put an end to it. i can tell you what it means to not exist that should have been pursued and that is to say, and then make war on your credit. that should have been off the table. and then negotiations and diplomacy would be nothing. they weren't negotiations and diplomacy put in by the, in math, in 2001 in geneva. and they talked about that not pushing the situation further, but the american still continue doing that. army ukraine using its land for its own military purposes, even not making it a member of it without taking any defense obligations whatsoever. how could we have put an end to that? well, i can tell you that invading and then slaughtering people in ukraine is not a solution, nor does it reduce the chances of nuclear war. in fact, it increasing the chancellor nuclear war, which is what we began talking about. a nat

and of course purchased more of them from the united states. we hear from us colleagues, actually advice, invest in your own strategic enablers because there might come a time. and it could be pretty soon when actually we, the u. s. might be engaged fully elsewhere in asia pacific and we will be simply unable to support you. and as washington goes, so goes there allies. a poll now shows that 50 percent of those living in australia would be in favor of military action to defend taiwan. so while joe biden says he does not seek any confrontation or conflict with china, he simply wants competition. his actions tell us something very different and the result of those actions going to have dire consequences for the world war is a very intense thing. latest defense, strategic pay for this recently come out lists. china is more dangerous than russia. well, the tech industry is choke point for the chinese for their future. and 5th, 6 generation development, for example, and they're pushing electronics very, very hard. that's a very significant developme

well , other developing countries are following the united states.l, european ones, which are also starting to raise interest rates. and in this connection already the un conference on trade and the third yung tat publishes an annual report in which they write that such actions cause very serious damage. first of all, on the developing countries of alexander mikhailovich, well, than neo-colonialism in its purest form to me, moreover, it follows from the president’s words that he clearly gave, uh, an indication that we both understand and see a real threat, not only in relation to us, but to the whole world. you look at what the americans are sacrificing today, they easily part with their allies. they actually destroyed europe and then, what was said on well in the speech of our president is not about colonism. we are actually watching. how is it in the example of germany what is happening today due to the fact that germany is involved in war games. uh, in ukraine, in fact today, uh, to the detriment of itself, it destroys markets, destroys its econom

this is what happened to the north stream pipeline beneficial to the united states. definitely people, americans, suppliers of liquefied natural gas muscular, celebrating the huge increase in l. n. g supplies to the european continent. now, from a political point of, you will see the last threat, ensuring the independence of the in the field of energy has been broken. europeans are left alone with their problems fierce, but no one cares overseas. that a very dark coal in long winter ways. in connection with these simple and logical questions i want to ask the representative of the united states. can you confirm right now in this room? your country has nothing to do with the sabotage and well we had russia taken to the floor of the un security council and pointing out that at the end of the day, it is the united day. any natural gas companies in the united states with the main beneficiaries of the act, sabotage ord stream to pipeline. and the russian representatives pointed out earlier. we heard by saying that he would put an end to the north stream to pipeline in res

and as the united states has to carry the burden of europe, it's not as if the united states doesn't suffer nice. it does offer. and the nice, it also doesn't benefit from a week and broken euro, even if there is it. if they force a divorce between europe and russia to their own benefit when a broken europe is, is a wage that the magazine has to carry with it. so it's not a win for the united states. meanwhile, china continues to evolve. iran is now used to the sanctions even though the united states has tried desperately to the same life, the country and it didn't work and it's not going to work. iran is now a member of the shanghai population organization in the summit meeting and was pakistan. there were major and agreements between the line and russia. you run in china. iran in the spec is on russia and china, india wanting to do business with russia to re run through the whole of asia is changing. the map is changing and there's really nothing that the united states can do about a professional to annoy him in new ellie. the last time you were on the program, i think we talked ab

i mean, i think they are basically just tools of the united states. i think they're happy to be that. and i think they see that no matter what happens there are lands find zalinski ill, be a billionaire somewhere on that island or something. so they're willing to do crazy things, even things that hurt their own people to at least continue to have favor with united states. that that's how i view anyway. but they know that the well and the russians making a secret of that, russian intelligence services have per day along hands, as we say here in russian lighting important is usually pretty straight forward and expressing his intentions. a couple of weeks ago, he explicitly said that the russian is going to retaliate and retaliate strongly that tax on its land on its infrastructure continue. and yet everybody seems to have ignored that warning. why do you think i put in is not being taken seriously? neither here nor in washington. i think he's being taken seriously. i mean, obviously he warned about the intervention in february. you said that was going t

the united states is rapidly on the decline. they continue with their and this war as an occupations. the nice it is basically a military machine and it constantly feeds that military machine. and meanwhile, the rest of the global south is, is on the rise. i mean, when one side is on the decline, the other side rises whether in or whether it's in relative terms or otherwise. so i think that actually this winter will make things much clearer. yeah, because as europe moves towards crisis and as the united states has to carry the burden of europe, it's not as if the united states doesn't suffer nice is, does suffer. and the nice is also doesn't benefit from a week and broken euro, even if there is it, if they force a divorce between europe and russia to their own benefit when a broken euro is, is a wage that the magazine has to carry with it. so it's not a women for the united states. meanwhile, china continues to evolve. iran is now used to the sanctions, even though the united states as tried desperately to the same life the coun