had an effect in the united states. on the question of the amount of territory, there's nothing in the papers that explains that. i would be happy to have the dea administrator say something, but this is really outside the scope of what we are doing here. >> thank you. [i

the china setting, so the idea that the united states thinks they can contain china because it contain the soviet union. the so even was a very weak state. the soviet union was like a 3rd world country that happened to have nuclear weapons. so maybe they contain them, maybe that the soviets contain themselves, but you're not going to contain china. and this belief in containment is something that i've been very critical of over the past 2 years of the body and ministration . there's no doubt about that. you can't contain a power, a strong and economically powerful as china. and we should give up the ghost because countries of ozzy on the 10 nations that form the i c on association. and countries generally don't want to be part of a sino american cold war. this is something that the united states that are realized because they're diplomacy will not be effective until they realize that containment can just cannot be done with, with relationship to child. when do you think the idea that nato expansion was a good thing for the united states? came to know why does because i know you've writ

even recognizing, finally, everyone's recognizing america, i've flown over more territory in the united states since i've been president in a helicopter that has been burned to the ground and comprises the entire state of maryland, be equal to the entire state of maryland. ireland's famous, 40 shades of green are being supplemented by green energy, green agriculture, green jobs make no mistake. the entire world sees and is drawn to the opportunities that exist on this island, the skilled workers, the high tech infrastructure, innovators who are breaking barriers, the connection and kinship you share, not just in the united states and the countries around the globe. i know you all know it, but maybe sometimes we forget it. ireland is a hotbed of cutting edge science, research and emerging technologies that's going to influence so much of our shared future for real, working in partnership with ireland, the united states, together with the european union and like minded parties around the world are going to ensure that those technologies are grounded in the same core values we have championed for

a partnership for the united states. a partnership for the ages _ the united states.an with our shared history— the ages. began with our shared history dating back to the very founding — history dating back to the very founding of the united states. the irish hearts that helped kindle the torch of— irish hearts that helped kindle the torch of liberty in my country and fire its _ torch of liberty in my country and fire its revolutionary spirit. the irish— fire its revolutionary spirit. the irish blood _ fire its revolutionary spirit. the irish blood from across this island that was— irish blood from across this island that was willingly given for my countries _ that was willingly given for my countries independence. the irish hahds _ countries independence. the irish hahds that— countries independence. the irish hands that were laid the foundations of a new— hands that were laid the foundations of a new kind of future, one from the bottom — of a new kind of future, one from the bottom up in the middle out. one built on— the bottom up in the middle out. one built on fre

had an effect in the united states. on the question of the amount of territory, there's nothing in the papers that explains that. i would be happy to have the dea administrator say something, but this is really outside the scope of what we are doing here. >> thank you. [indiscernible] [captions copyright national cable satellite corp. 2022] [captioning performed by the national captioning institute, which is responsible for its caption content and accuracy. visit ncicap.org] >> c-span's "washington journal." every day, we are taking your calls live on the air on the news of the day, and we discussed policy issues that impact you. coming up in our spotlight on podcasts segment, fernando escuela discusses his podcast and focuses on how political power impacts democracy. and the host of the podcast were on the rocks, ryan evans, on the russia-ukraine conflict, the leak pentagon documents, and the new white house report on the u.s. withdrawal from afghanistan. watch "washington journal" live at 7:00 eastern on c-span or c-s

this is really a benefit to the united states because the united states is the biggest oil export . oh, it is never understand that the media coverage this explain why it actually the united states benefits from the saudi production and the russian production cut. absolutely. the reason why the united states benefits from the old production card is because the united states has become the marginal provider of. ready ready oil for the rest of the world when there's a reduction in production for many of the of the over producers. the united states has gone to produce almost. ready $11000000.00 barrels a day, which is more than what saudi arabia. ready in russia, produced bar and the fact that the united states has become almost energy independent. ready is an important factor that, for example, has saved the european union in its energy prices by bringing liquefied natural gas from the united states. when the intentions with russia became more evident. so all of that is benefiting the united states on the one hand it or you believe the north stream with right by the, by ministration.

pentagon will finance the goals and the task determines the pentagon will be subordinate to the united states defense and their system will be brought into a single system of military biological intelligence military specialists who will work on the territory of other sovereign states and come from the united states will be released. from any responsibility. all derivation of biomaterials of the genetic material of the pathogen virus will be carried out in private and in fact. after all, viruses are pathogens that live in any region. and if they return with enhanced properties, they can easily be disguised as natural outbreaks of the epidemiological epidemic. in addition, we can see that on the example of ukraine biological project, and not in parallel launched a program of destruction of public health vaccination vaccination. as you remember poroshenko, a citizen of the united states, suprun, was appointed minister of health and the sanitary and epidemiological service was completely liquidated, and ukraine became a living laboratory for testing to monitor people who, for some reason, sudden

the united states had no armaments industry. american makers of plowshares could with time and as required, make swords as well. but we can no longer risk an emergency improvization of national defense. we have been compelled to create a permanent armaments industry of bad proportions. and to do this, three and a half million men and women are directly engaged in the defense establishment. we annually spend on military security alone more than the net income all united states corporations. corporations. now this conjuncture of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the american experience. the total influence economic, political, even spiritual, is felt in every city, every statehouse, every office of the federal government. we recognize the imperative of need for this development. yet we must not fail to comprehend the grave implications. our toil, resources and livelihood are all involved. so is the very structure of our society in the councils of government. we must ga guard against the acquisit

what i'm trying to say is that while the united states has got a leverage over the philippines, as united states does not necessarily have leverage over china, because let's not forget aid. the child's name is been and is larger than the united states in terms of numbers, but certainly the waters in. ready over time on straight and as much nearer to china than the united states. and of course, china has got the anti access area, denial, missiles, or aircraft killing designs, and also remote control, drones and underwater acids that can meet in the intervention body united states. but on the other hand, there's no formula to prove to prevent a whole war, and when it, when a full war happens, immediately as, as is on, it could be called on to damage. that's the one in front of it. well, let's bring in a group polling here. we've just been talking about navy. we're talking about maritime, clearly the philippines and archipelago of islands. but these are 2 countries that cannot actually agree on even what to call it. china calls at the start trying to see the philippines calls at the west phi

they are then smuggling these drugs into the united states. chinese traffickers and money launderers are also increasing cooperation with mexican cartels. mexican cartels leverage that drug trafficking profits -- sophisticated weapons, corrupt officials, challenge the authorities of the mexican state. commit terrible atrocities. the same cartels are profiting from prolonged illegal immigration crisis. biden ministration's week -- several of my senate foreign relation committee colleagues and i released a report last year offering concrete recommendations to improve border security. unfortunately, the administration fuses to even a knowledge that we have a problem. it is time the administration wakes up. we have a serious threat at the border, and the president needs to be serious about addressing it. the chinese government task an endorsement of this massive drug trade is a huge issue. the readout of the presidents meeting with xi jinping in november makes no mention whatsoever of this really serious problem. where, if china is complicit in sup

that's 3 times more than it sells to the united states. in this footage, from the chinese state broadcaster c g t n, some people gather that type airport to protest against president sized visit to california is what they had to say. i did sign a cathy meeting will cause conflict across the taiwan straits. it can't bring peace if you're going to start across straits conflict and ignite a war. what kind of democracy is there without peace saying when go back to the u. s. the u. s. as we're home, if the chinese mainland imposes sanctions on the tail and region, or the consequences will be borne by his people while taking when the south bears no loss. ah, what is a big important story to let's take it on join now by our guests in new york. we have victor gow, who's vice president of the center for china and globalization, and former officer with the chinese foreign service in miami is june. teufel drayer, a professor of political science at the university of miami and a senior fellow at the foreign policy research institute june is also the a

with the blueprints and they would leave behind the copy to implicate the congress party of the united states this is a copy of the mi5 obtained. it seems like an unlikely plot but they thought there is a serious possibility. so they tipped off the americans and that's how the nine states got onto the case. the fbi put him in charge. now very obscure america's best detectives. much of my book rests on evidence from the files. please image. this is an image of bearing a gun the fbi at this stage have begun to issue weapons to special agents hoover initially had been against carrying weapons he was no stranger to guns. he was an action world war. next image please. the next image is in a more pensive look. that is more typical because his contribution was a tough guy and he was touchy about that. the contribution was cognitive in the breaking up of spying. move take that off now. he was born in a russian control town. he is a consummate liar. people still hold that against him. although on the other hand it helped him detect that and the people he was intimately, who claim to be an orphan to ge

the united states by sea. we have saved countless lives and we have returned the migrants to their home countries that will continue. in addition, we are finalizing the regulation that the departments of justice and homeland security jointly proposed earlier this year, that proposed regulation will incentivize individuals to avail themselves of lawful, safe and orderly pathways and disincentivize dangerous border crossings by placing a new condition on asyleligibility for those who fail to use those pathways. the departments of justice and homeland security aim to have the rule finalized by may 11th and will swiftly implement it . the work we have been performing to prepare for post title 42 continues as i have previously outlined in our six pillar plan, we are surging resources to our border modernizing processes, attacking the smuggling organizations with unprecedented law enforcement focus, strengthening our immigration enforcement tool of expedited removal. working to increase information sharing and resou

the united states had no armaments industry. american makers of plowshares could with time and as required, make swords as well. but we can no longer risk an emergency improvization of national defense. we have been compelled to create a permanent armaments industry of bad proportions. and to do this, three and a half million men and women are directly engaged in the defense establishment. we annually spend on military security alone more than the net income all united states corporations. corporations. now this conjuncture of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the american experience. the total influence economic, political, even spiritual, is felt in every city, every statehouse, every office of the federal government. we recognize the imperative of need for this development. yet we must not fail to comprehend the grave implications. our toil, resources and livelihood are all involved. so is the very structure of our society in the councils of government. we must ga guard against the acquisit

, it sees as its adversaries and all countries who are against the united states, he sees as his allies, so i think that china's position will not change in any way. and why, uh, in these hypothetical allies, china chooses france, what does france have? with the states, what does sisinping think? can play into his hand, well, look, china just wants to kill some kind of well, to break through, let's say, some kind of uh splits between the united states and the european union, so he would naturally look for an opportunity to do this through some influence on the leading countries of course, such leading countries are france and germany, the largest economy of the european union. well, that's why he's obviously trying to somehow get france to at least take his side in some issues, first of all. probably, this means economic issues and... so that france does not act unanimously as the united states against the policy of china and so on, that is, it is obvious that china will try to communicate with the national with france with germany. er, an indicator of the weakness of europe, tha

addition that there needs to be the same criteria as applied to said background checks and the united states for purchases of firearms, or that are applied to foreign military police assistance that excludes assistance to units of foreign military police that are implicated in gross human rights abuses. but that same criteria should be implemented with firearms exports. why would we be arming the very people that we say we are fighting? the very people thele republican say they want to bomb or you strong attacks against mexico, why would be the arming them either through legal exports or through firearm sales within the united states that arere easily trafficked over the border? with that, i will pass it on to the next speaker. [applause] [inaudible] -- a new ngo, is a better? what i i said i will say again. i'm elizabeth burke, i am with global action on gun violence. we are a new ngo dedicated to using what we referring to as the outside gain to try and make some reduction in the flow of illegal weapons outside come to the outside of the united states. we think about the inside game as the

they are concerned about the united states being able to lead the free world.are doing that again. whether i put together nato and the european union, i think we have. but there is more to do. with regard to age, i can even say how old i am. it doesn't register. the only thing i can say is they are going to judge -- i take a hard look at it as well. i feel good, i feel excited about the prospects. i have never been more optimistic in my life about the possibilities of the united states. >> you said i know him well. >> i do know him well. he is not hard to know. you know him well. the question is -- finish the job. we have the opportunity to put ourselves in a position where we are economically and politically secure for a long time. there is still contest between autocracies and democracies. this is something i have thought about. i think we have to finish the job and nail it down. click the microphone was not used, we cannot enter -- >> please use the microphone, we cannot provide interpretation if you don't. >> use the microphone. >> with regard to that, we a

like when i was sovereign erna, the question was whether it was in the interest of the united states and what this implied for the united. nobody said in the, in the other ones are not ok. no one terrorists in the navy, united generally, not listeners. let's, let's try and keep things a bit more calmer. ben, let me come to you and ask you about the relationship with china and russia. i asked her, it says yes if it helps. nicaragua is economy. why not? but nicaragua needs to be careful about this. these are strategic has a relationship so called strategic relationships. so what, what it, what is your thought about this? well, 1st of all, i just want to stress it, there has been absolutely no indication whatsoever that nicaragua has even for a 2nd, considered giving some of its territory to any foreign country. i should point out that actually the united states has militarily occupied nicaragua, the u. s has militarily occupied nicaragua on 3 different occasions. so, i mean, this is complete projection, but in terms of china and russia, the relationship is a no brainer. here's an exampl

and the concept in the united states in america was me. and i say check was that the british were in the sense that were in the feasible, they were invincible. they couldn't be beaten. and you know, george washington sounds that before the continental congress and says, remembers how 20 years earlier, he was at the battle monongahela during the french and indian war, where the biggest, most powerful british army was wiped out. and its general braddock was killed. and all the alternator officers were killed by a handful of french and indians. and washington says, what was less and they're not invincible. all we gotta do is hide behind trees. go against probability. come up with a new system. i'm. my hope is that we, yes, the probability is that we're going to go on doing this and we're going to create, continue to create a problems more severe, hurricanes, more severe climate change, et cetera. but i believe that we can go against probability and a cause history is written by people who oppose ability and do something come up with a new ide

russia does not want to be an enemy of the united states but if the united states behaves like an enemyne of the problems of ideologically oriented politics, because we consider russia and, as a result, belarus as an enemy. you know when you're in conflict the last thing you want is to i have seen you as a fellow identified with you as a human being, because then my humanity kicks in and i say why i want to hurt you. this is the last thing a person should want to do to another person. therefore, in order to justify this policy of sanctions, we must degunize you and the first thing we do is attack your leadership, because in the west we believe in the principle of democracy, according to which, ironically, free and independent people do not choose bad people as their leaders. i i know maybe we are doing so well here in the united states and europe but look at your leaders and then as a consequence we will attack you don't be surprised and therefore we can go along with imposing sanctions because we accuse you of you have bad leadership. we say it's your fault . the blame of the people on

the united states led the u.s. forces in helping to dissent -- defend not from north korea and china. millions of koreans of course, they have found a cease-fire with china and north korea and this year july, 27 marked the 70th anniversary. it is a key anniversary in the alliance between united states and south korea. i will also mention that this comes not long after north korea launched a new intercontinental ballistic missile. one that is designed to strike us here in washington dc and also, designed for north koreans to launch quickly and without much notice. this visit is coming on the heels of an unprecedented campaign by north korea to test his arsenal, expand its arsenal. for all those reasons as well as the gao -- political issues when it comes to china, ukraine, semiconductors, global supply chain, all these issues come at an opportune time for the united states and south korea. to both honor their relationship and also show how it is involved. host: does this visit do anything to harm north korea? does i

i think, i think we should keep in mind that the south korea in the united states have stated they are interested in talks with north korea unconditionally and that north korea has not taking them up on that at all yet. and so in a vacuum, the alliance feels they have to take a certain positions and the washington declaration, as is one more evolution of those positions, until they can sit down and do more talking with north korea. so that, you know, you know what, i want to point out every president since it was it since world war 2 said that they're not gonna allow another country, especially when north korea became an issue to have nuclear weapons. now we're all sitting here acknowledging that they do have nuclear weapons that they can hit the united states. where is the responsibility for this? i mean it's, it's been failed efforts on both sides that have led to the situation where everybody is in danger. i want to take a pause here because i know you just mentioned a number of presidents have had said the same thing where we are talking about a number of potential different presid

they are then smuggling these drugs into the united states. chinese traffickers, moneylenders are increasing cooperation with mexican cartels. mexican cartels leverage drug trafficking profits to acquire sophisticated weapons, corrupt officials, challenge the authority of the mexican state, and commit atrocities. this prolongs the illegal migration crisis caused by the biden's administration week enforcement of border controls. several of my senate foreign relations committee colleagues released a report last year offering concrete recommendation to improve border security. unfortunately the administration refuses to acknowledge that we have a problem. it is time the administration makes up. we have a serious threat to the border. the president needs to be serious about addressing it. the chinese government tacit endorsement of the massive drug trade is a huge issue. 's meeting -- the readout of the president's meeting with xi jinping makes no mention of this serious problem. worse, china is complicit when supplying fentanyl to the united state

up tension when united states and geopolitical rivals. but the, you, the signal much that there are mechanisms of intervention and maritime security issues which are being created under the auspices of the united states with an eye to ensuring the unilateral interests of the west in the waters of the south china sea. but it is no secret that the goal of the indo pacific strategies is to contain china and isolate russia. you have this is how our western colleagues interpret effective multilateralism drugs in asia pacific region. now he also talked about how u. s. efforts to isolate russia around the world have resulted in food supply chains being caught problems in the energy markets and all kinds of consequences, global community. the emphasized that russia's vision is for world cooperating together and model of globalization that benefits every country within the gustavo homelessness. genuine multilateralism at the present stage to requires the adaptation of the un 2 objective trends of formation square over multi polar architecture of i

go to the united states. there should be no time limit. you may know that the claim for reparations with regard to what's being discussed in sacramento, california. as we speak, turns on the question of and slave africans. as you know in the united states of america, there is a legal principle that there should be there should not be a wrong without a remedy. the wrong was the fact that people were brought across the atlantic against their will, forced to work for free. the remedy is reparations to their descendants who have suffered grievously as a result of that initial enslavement. there is a stork president for reparations united states. i heard, and you're set a piece that there was mention of the, in an unjust incarceration of japanese americans during world war 2. a few decades later, they were granted reparations by the us government, united states government, even as lobby to broad for reparations to the folks who were subjected to the holocaust and central eastern europe, and the 1930. so the 1940,

or a colony of united states. we're not going to allow any foreign governments to intervene in our territory, much less the armed forces of a foreign government. mexico is a free, independent sovereign country. we did not receive orders from any one. the people of mexico govern here. not getting on honor. they still have not abandoned the monroe doctrine. they do not want to change, so they believe they are the government of the world. they assumed themselves to be the government of the world. so, as mexico lays down the law to the white house, it seems unlikely that the u. s. will change its behavior with the unfortunate reality remaining. that whether you are a friend or a foe, it seems uncle sam is watching and listening to your every move lies something air to update you on today. russian cosmonaut south concluded their 1st space walk this year outside the international space station. the weightless voyage lasted for almost 7 hours, cosmonaut surrogate for copy f and dmitri patel and i've accomplished indeed t

the united states led the u.s. forces in helping to dissent -- defend not from north korea and china. millions of koreans of course, they have found a cease-fire with china and north korea and this year july, 27 marked the 70th anniversary. it is a key anniversary in the alliance between united states and south korea. i will also mention that this comes not long after north korea launched a new intercontinental ballistic missile. one that is designed to strike us here in washington dc and also, designed for north koreans to launch quickly and without much notice. this visit is coming on the heels of an unprecedented campaign by north korea to test his arsenal, expand its arsenal. for all those reasons as well as the gao -- political issues when it comes to china, ukraine, semiconductors, global supply chain, all these issues come at an opportune time for the united states and south korea. to both honor their relationship and also show how it is involved. host: does this visit do anything to harm north korea? does i

and what is the will of the united states to extend conflict as long as possible more blood shouldrainian resources. they're exhaustible we see now, what's going on at the front? we see that the most combat-ready units of the armed forces, which have been preparing for many years, are simply being crushed by the russian troops. it's a matter of time, what's next? how to support this conflict, how to make it break out, we need new foreigners, we need new victims, who do they have the baltic states, but this is only rhetoric, they don’t have a human resource, there is a lot of rhetoric, as they call them in internet the great three. lithuania latvia estonia causing laughter, which the poles can only bark, there is this time, but on the other hand. i would very much like to draw in the dream, belarus was always directed at this by their policy to destroy our state from the inside, to make it here at the beginning of the civil war, and then i’ll throw all this at russia, after some time it didn’t work out. so it is necessary to provoke, therefore he claims that kiev has applied for suc

china has 78 years , the united states has 68. the russian federation has sixty-two, that's three. eet. uh, china has already leaned on the day and the states on the pennants of ships of the first second rank, and china is already ahead by several dozen ships. with e production capacity of china for the construction of new ships, they are generally without precedent, they lay in series and emit e into the water every year a dozen whiteouts in the ship of the main classes for the ground forces. the only place where it lags behind in china is in terms of nuclear missile potential, but taking into account china's ambitions, taking into account e, financial technological and other opportunities. i think they will catch up with us soon as the united states, so uh, the united states is generally losing ground. if you take the middle east, then you mentioned saudi arabia. here is another point, the saudis have already reconciled. uh, with the houthis. they end this conflict. i'm talking about what happened yesterday. three more days today back and and saudi arabia, that is, there e comes,

that is united states policy.under this doctrine, the united states has undermined and overthrown at least a dozen countries throughout latin america, central america, and the caribbean. amy: that was bernie sanders speaking last year. well, on saturday, american university in washington, d.c., will be hosting a one-day conference titled "burying 200 years of the u.s. monroe doctrine." democracy now!'s juan gonzalez will give the opening plenary. we are joined now by two other guests as well. nick estes, the indigenous writer and historian. he is a co-founder of the indigenous resistance group the red nation and a citizen of the lower brule sioux tribe. author of "our history is the future: standing rock versus the dakota access pipeline, and the long tradition of indigenous resistance." nick is joining us from minneapolis. in washington, d.c., medea benjamin, co-founder of codepink, co-author of the new book "war in ukraine: making sense of a senseless conflict." we welcome you both. medea, let's begin with you.

ago the united states. so it's usually hard intended in lots of ways. remember that the us special envoy to northern ireland, george mitchell had a long career and started politics and in american politics was the person who jazz the party talk. he was appointed, especially by president clinton at the time, and clinton himself had set to set the groundwork for a lot of the service. what eventually became the mitchell principles which join mitchell produced to flow from that. and generally speaking, mitchell won the respect and commanded the respectful a lot of politicians in northern ireland in a way which has happened before. generally speaking, you'd say the us place that kind of honest, broke around very successfully. and they have, since the good friday agreement also maintained that and, and kept a close eye on the island it, what was it about the u. s. or maybe about the, you know, the personality of mitchell that made the country an agreeable broker to both sides in the talks. well, it's an interesti

doesn't mean that the united states needed one to have a global war on terror. it doesn't necessarily mean that the united should have invaded iraq. but the facts. but. but. but the fears were real. and what i try to do in my book is both to illuminate why policy makers felt fearful and then to examine whether they took appropriate in relationship to the fears that existed. and so my book is both very empathetic, but also, as you know, extremely critical. but it raises the basic question of when there is fear, when there is threat perception, what sorts actions are appropriate. and how to calibrate them in ways that maximum benefits and minimize costs. and i'm very critical of the bush administration for not systematically exam costs and consequence answers of a prospective invasion of iraq. it really remarkable how thought went into that part of it. as you say in your book, we must get this story if we're going to avoid these mistakes. the book is confronting hussein. george w bush and the invasion of iraq melvyn leffler, thank you for being here. thank you. it'

they will find a friend in the united states. ah, with you little bit about it all to anybody basie. so the city, if you draw you look at the book they incentives that needs to get a few color. rebel notions is one among several means to reach the goal of conquering foreign lands and bringing them onto the help of u. s. western economic interests. people inside it, i don't that needed to everybody did them. okay. yeah, you training class. so no, we just say a softball, m a cat. and the final goal of these thing revolutions is to ensure that there are no independent players in the world anymore. oh, a a a ukrainian link takes 3 minutes group calling itself the national republican army claims responsibility for the assassination of russia. journalist loveland to talk about the main suspect was placed under arrest in moscow on terrorism charges with donald trump plead not guilty on how she money charges is the appears in court in new york call to formally being placed on the arrest is the 1st we u. s, president to face with the us o

that is a deep friction between china and the united states, and also european allies of the united states that also claim the one china policy instead of the one china principle. >> why is mccarthy meeting taiwan's president now? what message could he be sending? >> it has to do with domestic politics in the united states. there is hardly any bipartisan issue left but being china is certainly one of -- being tough on china is certainly one of them. speaker pelosi has visited and sent a strong message to beijing. she has sent a message to the domestic audience that she as well as the lead democrats are really standing close with taiwan. i think speaker mccarthy wants to repeat this very strong signal, and taiwan is not just a very important domestic issue in the united states but also of utmost importance in terms of technology, in terms of the overarching rivalry between the united states and the people's republic of china. >> thank you so much for giving us your take. she met speaker of the house kevin mccarthy. >> thank you so much. >> let's take a look at some of the other stories maki

not unless we're not a protectorate of the united states or a colony of united states. we're not going to allow any foreign governments to intervene in our territory, much less the armed forces of a foreign government. mexico is a free, independent sovereign country. we did not receive orders from any one. the people of mexico govern here. not getting on honor. they still have not abandoned the monroe doctrine. they do not want to change, so they believe they are the government of the world. they assume themselves to be the government of the world. so, as mexico lays down the law to the white house, it seems unlikely that the u. s. will change its behavior with the unfortunate reality remaining. that whether you are a friend or a foe, it seems uncle sam is watching and listening to your every move. republican congressman is pushing the by an assertion to disclose a number of us troops engaged in rain and detail. washington's assistance to keep he is willing to give it new resolution on that passed into law. the biden administration and other allied countries have been m

and declares that the united states must work with its allies and partners to ensure that theederation will pay ukraine reparations, the international community will help rebuild ukraine, and last but not least, it provides for holding representatives of the russian government to account for this war and establishing justice, as evidenced by this what does this document mean? is it some kind of a break or does it only indicate the support of two parties and nothing else, and especially you should not rely on this document but the very fact that the president of ukraine, viktor yushchenko, came to present this document. well, obviously, this is not such a strong signal . in fact, i saw not only the external context. well, she actually said something before the counteroffensive after the visits. by the way, the europeans to china before the end of this in the fall of 2018, we will have very important elections in poland, we will have elections in slovakia, that is, a change in the political situation among the allies - these are all important external signals, but one must under

you know, the united states needs to be called to recognize on this. and now of course, this no workers deals with china's economic hit men who are doing pretty much the same thing. they, they've got a different story to tell. they've got a new marketing technique which is very, very effective. but it's basically the same story, their economic hitman learned from our failures and our successes, and they're doing out of much more efficient job than we ever did. and you expect that to me, attacked by a mission in laden, they shouldn't media press or do they, will they like this one? because you do attack china, which is a kind of trope, many people doubt the we good story of people can see are, is few with a we as an, as another story designed by the kinds of forces that you've described for decades to destabilize countries. how do you expect the response to this a update to the edition or to some instruction manual, how to destroy developing well countries to others, how to save them? well, my hope is that people will really look at what i think is the