if we are a party, we file a brief for the united states articulated at length and in conclusion we urged mandamus. i think the line between cases to be whether we find them to be irrelevant, not how we capture them. nothing would have been different if we found exactly same -- exactly the same briefs. we have not been able to find ay case from any court where respondent supported a petitioner and a court cannot look at the arguments that party was making in support of the release. you, rao: i may agree with but at this point it seems like some members of the court not. mr. wall: i understand that there may be disagreement over that. -- two culminate now and file a mandamus petition, it would have been word for word what we already put in front of the court is exactly what i understand is not necessary. i think it would have been a distracting, it arguably would have been in the same eyes of the members who think we should've filed earlier. even if you thought there was some problem with us as a party and petitioner, which we do routinely in the courts of appeals. flynnl think general und

the real party filed briefs under the united states articulated him we urged mandamus through the line between cases to be whether we have filed in that relief map how we captioned the reef. nothing here would have been different if we would have had exactlyth the same brief that is a brief of the united states and the mandamus petition and we haven't been able to find any case for many court where we supported the palo duro responded supported the petitioner and the court didn't look at the argument that party was making for supporters of relief. >> i disagree with you on that argument but at this point it seems some members of the court do not. >> i understand there may be disagreement over that but i think to have come in now and filed a mandatory mandamus petition that would have been a word for for what we have already put in for the court in exactly what i understand was necessary they think it would have been distracting and it would have been dilatory in the same issa the members who think wewe should have filed earlier d even a few that there was some problem as a party has re

what will it take for the united states to prevail in this competition with china? could you articulate some of the core policy thats that it-- policy paths that the administration has pursued and will continue to pursue? mr. o'brien: it's a great question, paula. pointed the impressive things -- one of the impressive things the trump administration did in the initial years was put out a defense strategy, and we have near-peer competitors, russia and china, that are trying to reshape the global commons, trying to change the global norms and rules of the road, so to speak, we have all operated under the second world war. with china, we have unique challenges. you have a communist party of china that is an heir to china-- stalin's russian communist party, marxist-leninist party. they have total control over their people. the control is becoming orwell would have imagined when he wrote "1984" with mass surveillance. they are exploiting that control , the national security law and a democracy in hong kong. they are bullying republic of china, taiwan. the indians are not going to take it. th

we filed a brief for the united states. we articulated at length the harms and urged mandamus. i think the line between cases like exxon mobil, whether we have filed the relevant release, not how we captured the brief. nothing would have been different if we had the same brief but said it was a brief for the u.s. and mandamus petition. we have not been able to find any case from any court where a respondent supported a petitioner and the court did not look the arguments that that party was making in support. judge rao: i agree with you as to that argument. at this point, it seems some members of the court do not. mr. wall: i understand that there may be disagreement over that. now andto have come in you have filed a late-breaking mandamus petition, that would have been word for word what we already put in front of the court is exactly what i understood exxon mobil to say is unnecessary. i think it arguably would have been dilatory in the same eyes filed thebers who petition earlier. there is a supreme court rule designed to allow this. i still think general flynn can weigh the

now he has a long increasingly articulated view of united states place in the world but what's also very interesting is that he hates woodrow wilson. it's going to get personal and i love this. i would never fly at harvard and it's gonna come right back from the president of the united states. okay. so how do they start fighting? i'm going to tell one story about the debate athena distance that nobody remembers. how to and world war i with imperial germany. . this is going to be the most energetic ferocious result on the prerogatives of a president to lead a american foreign policy in the history of the republic. we're going to have a president who says at the end of world war one i'm in favor of entering this war by negotiating. we're going to have two republican leaders who go to the american people and say, the president is wrong. we have elections in four weeks. if you will vote republican, will force the president of the united states to adopt unconditional surrender, as a policy to end world war i. and the world. of course the story begins in part with the president's famous speech

united states. i fear as the "wall street journal" clearly articulated this will have a prolonged effect. you remember in the decade past we had a huge migration of american cities to the suburbs where you had no investment in what became the slums across this country. that would be the tragedy the likes of which, i don't know that we fully wrap our heads around. but that is going to happen unless you have the leadership here. it's provided by a bunch of the liberal democrats what control the entirety of the governance of all of the cities over decades and decades and decades. i don't see anything happening there any time soon. unfortunately, the idea they will have a reform vote in november to replace some of the things i think is sort of a fantasy. but this is something that people i think dagen mentioned earlier, the businesses in seattle. yes. everyone needs to be involved in this. and try to drag people to the table. to get the cities to a point where they can function again. >> harris: i argue josh, and again this is from my perspective, having covered the unrest in this country and

and thirdly, to talk about in specific detail how the united states will begin to repair its relations in the world and articulate to the american people how we're going to move past this deadly pandemic, where there's so many more yet to die because of the horrendous incompetence we've seen from the administration. >> and we are told that both the former vice president joe biden and kamala harris are in the building. so they may come out to that podium any moment now. what we don't know, maria, is whether or not they'll stand close together. we don't know whether we'll get that image that is so familiar in situations, hands clasps, raised above their heads. but in some ways, does the fact that they're in this gymnasium, that people are spaced apart, that there aren't cheering crowds, does that image alone without even saying anything send a message about where we are as a country and the justification for why they believe donald trump needs to be removed from office? >> one of the biggest challenges, chris, that we've had in dealing with this pandemic is we've had a president that says we should not even wear a

united states of america, ealthiest -- ms. tlaib: he does this jamaal. he'll get used to it. senator sanders: i'm helping articulate it. ms. tlaib: bernie, i'm letting know what ids happens. ok. senator sanders: it's hard raising kids, isn't it? trying to raise her and look what i get. ms. tlaib: you're talking about school districts right now that are talking about, one, you is , obviously the pandemic preventing a full opening. also, they're already seeing going to be huge deficits. they can't have five-day week schools. they are talking about two days again, the loss of revenue, $305 billion they need right now. far.s the estimation so that's with the pandemic. t's been now six, seven -- eight months. did i do it right? did i do it right? senator sanders: that was pretty good. ms. tlaib: what do you want me say? listen, i think everybody that's listening knows this -- our kids don't come first anywhere. i don't understand. like, oh, eople are my god. look. why are you guys doing this or and not -- the absurdity of it. airlines.bout oh, my gosh, we have to save the airlines. districts. they're like what? it's so bizarre

united states. we are very, very excited about this and tonight, vice president biden, this is about the people. you are to hear him articulateis vision for america. throughout this convention you really heard us talk about, we the people, we talked about a more perfect union, highlighted the stories of folks from across this country, talked and tonight we are going to talk about the promise of america and yes, vice president biden will be not addressing a physical crowd in the room but we are having drive-ins all across the country where people will be watching his speech in their cars. and we are doing that because of the coronavirus, covid-19. we could not be together in milwaukee but we've organized virtually and there's a lot of excitement out there and we are looking forward to this evening. >> martha: we are looking forward to it, too. as we have been covering all of this week. when you look at pennsylvania which we started within the conversation here, i remember when we were at the town hall, bret baier and i am with president trump in scranton, former vice president biden's hometown, there were a lot of union member

united states, born in jamaica. night,ference to last bernie was articulate, he laid -- hischronicled experience, and he made sure thatverybody that he -- everything that he was saying about the president donald trump what is happening with donald trump. then, as far as michelle obama is concerned. humane, she touched americanfiber that an citizen needs to hold dearly. -- only thing that i was not i expected from her but did not hear from her is that she said biden is not perfect, and we know that. she said no one is perfect. however, donald trump in his campaign said that he is the only one that can fix it, meaning that he is the only perfect person. when barack obama left the white house, he left in place a , persons who were able , pandemics epidemics that would affect the united states. and, it was all torn down by president donald trump. and he is saying to black americans like myself, what do you have to lose? now you see what we have to lose, 170,000 people have died from this pandemic because of his -- so, athat is set supporter of -- cecil, a supporter of joe biden. michael bloomberg hoping to help house demo

united states out there attacking the lincoln project. it's i think successfully destabilized that campaign. it's -- they're obsessed with us. they talk about us. and they haven't been able to articulatent against vice president biden. and i think we have played a small role in that. look, you know, we don't confuse what we're doing with any personal mobility. we're political consultants, they talk us and we wouldn't vote for us either. we have some skills. we have three things. support donald trump or do nothing or we try to use these skills that we have to defeat donald trump. and that's what we're doing. we wake up every day doing it. and i think we're having an impact. i think we're going to continue to have an impact and all we can do is try to make a difference. >> a question for you here. you note in the book that even when you were advising republican presidential candidates they didn't listen to you for advice on vice presidential picks so there's some irony in what i'm about to ask you here, but i'm curious as a lapsed republican or maybe, you know, one of these voters that biden might be able to get from the middle in this case he has got your vote, which possible vice pres

from my understanding, there is not a clear articulation or easy way to deal with it with the legal problems of trying to force this company out of the united statesst: let us see if we could get a couple of quick callers in. john from ohio on the democratic line. good morning. caller: good morning. what is this relationship that you are talking about to the european community and the handcuffs they have put onto american tech companies? thank you. guest: this has also been a big tension with american companies, that effectively, the european most of thesees large tech companies. there has been this big worry that the way that the europeans have been dealing with large american tech companies is through fines and regulation. that has also been a consistent worry that they are trying to go after large, -- they are successful american companies, we should not deny that. there is obviously worry with the europeans that they are using fines and regulation in order to trying create their own local set of conditions to create their own silicon valley, and this is something they have been pursuing for the last 20 to 30 years. i think that what really irk

articulated on that sunday half a century ago. the ark of the moral universe is ben's towardeen -- -- it bends toward justice. it requires a president of the united statesan open mind. joe biden will be center president. with our voices and our votes, let us write the next chapter of the american story. one of hope, love, justice. if we do so, we might just save our country and our souls. >> good evening, i am congresswoman deb haaland. with you onto be indigenous land. the promise of this country is older than our constitution. over 500 years ago, thousands of indian tribes with rich cultures and traditions and communities that had sustained them for millennia on lands they loved and respected. my people, the pueblo indians, they migrated to the rio grande valley to escape drought. we were led to the great river and the tributaries where we established an agricultural tradition that continues to this day. survived centuries of brutal assimilation policies. foral nations have fought and helped build this country. there were those like my laguna grandparents who worked on our country's railroad and those like my mother, a navy veteran who served this cou

united states senator, maggie hassan. i'm happy to yield the floor to senator hassan from new hampshire. maggie? ms. hassan: thank you, senator carper for the very articulate overview that he just gave of the challenge before us and the importance, mr. president, of providing aid in this next relief package to state and local governments. they have been at this forefront of our nation's response to covid-19. they provide people and businesses with vital support, scouring the world for personal protective equipment, setting up testing centers, and providing emergency relief for families and businesses. they also employ millions of essential employees who are on the front lines of this crisis, including first responders, teachers, and many, many others. unfortunately, as this crisis rages on, state and local communities are facing uncertainty, mounting costs, and a devastating loss of revenue. for too long, the senate majority leader, senator mcconnell, stalled action on an additional relief package, which has only made matters worse. now, as negotiations are finally under way, we must ensure that the next relief bill provides significant additional federal