it is just interesting to see mexican officials lobbying the united states for the citizens to being the united states illegally but they have no prospect theory for american citizens who want to go down to mexico without proving their income. i will take my response offline, thanks. host: thank you. a really good point that you raise. it is actually difficult to emigrate to mexico. you have to go through an enormous amount of paperwork to do it legally. there are undocumented migrants in mexico, as well. first, the u.s. population in mexico has been growing steadily. there are now more than one million u.s. citizens living in mexico. a lot of them are in retirement communities around places like guadalajara, but you get a lot of people living in mexico city and other urban centers. this is because american citizens have worked out how the can actually provide by the rules and move legally to mexico, but we would have to recognize that there is a significant number, maybe thousands, tens of thousands, of americans living there in an undocumented fashion. this is a problem that goes bo

process to be reunited with her mother and father who were already living in the united states and are united states citizensr two sisters who are all united states citizens. she had finally been approved. they met in jordan and travel to the consulate for an interview. the conditions in yemen are so dangerous that the u.s. consulate prove -- pulled out of yemen. the father was instructed at the airport that only he could get on the plane. the 12-year-old daughter would have to stay behind, because of the travel ban. ever since, they have been stuck in this chaotic situation. the father needed to return, because he is the sole breadwinner for the family. however, the family does not want to send their daughter back to yemen. fortunately for them, due to the judge's order, they were able to board a plane on saturday. yesterday evening, for the first time, their 12-year-old daughter was reunited with her mother, father, and two sisters here in the united states. thinking about that, it is hard to imagine that -- when they were instructed at the airport that she could not get on to the plane, she broke down int

i've had discussions with clients of mine who are citizens of the united states, who are contributing, making a great life here and been here for years and are citizens. but happen to have a passport from one of the seven countries and they're fearful. i tell you what, i never imagined as an attorney that i would have to counsel a united states citizen about traveling abroad. a united states citizen who is contributing. it's an absolutely awful situation that the president has put the country in. and i think what we need to do is we need to take a step back. this needs to be talked about. this needs to be fought. and you can see that the federal judges around the country, whether it's in new york, whether it's in los angeles, and last night in seattle, federal judges are standing up to this. the courts are standing up to this. we've seen heroic lawyers from the aclu from the national immigration law center. from the american immigration lawyers association. go out and fight donald trump and fight this illegal executive order in court and in the airports and provide representation. we

who we don't even know whose country won't tell us who that person is has primacy over the united states citizenschool students protecting the president but do they even know why, watch this. >> so don't you want to check if someone is cool before you let them in? >> of course, we want to check. >> that's why we want extreme vetting. >> so you do agree with the trump ban eir competitors' rates alongside their direct rate to save you money. but what's really going on? when played backwards at 1/8th speed you can clearly hear... what could that mean? woman: tom? tom! they're just commercials. or are they? you're waking the neighbors. well, mom, maybe the neighbors need to be woke. i think it's actually "awoken." no, that doesn't even seem right. no, it's "awoken." revealing the truth to help you save. ♪ ♪ ♪ heather: good morning to you, you are watching "fox & friends first". much of the country in a deep freeze as they wake up this morning. i'm heather childers. heather: and i'm heather. we start with fox news alert. blocked once again an appeal's court refuse to go reinstate president trump's im

i do not have the right to reenter the united states once i leave the country. i'm united states citizeni do not have the right to enter the united states without getting vetted myself, and i'm a citizen. host: gregory there in west virginia. wendy in vero beach, f lorida, opposing the present. caller: i actually support the president. can i still speak? host: sure, go ahead. caller: what i want to say in my argument is that i actually watch, um, several documentaries by dennis michael lynch that actually showed isis, and the their ownin words were they would actually infiltrate our country pretended to be good muslims and get in positions in our country in the government and law enforcement, and positions of power and they would pretend to be good muslims until they got enough of them in here to be in those positions of power, and then they would flip the switch. then they would put in sharia law, and would do whatever they could do to destroy our country. i don't see how anyone. host: where did you watch that? caller: dennis michael lynch has done a large amount of documentaries on the

we have a mother and father, both united states citizens with two daughters who are here come also u.scitizens, who are separated from their 12-year-old daughter who is not. application had already been processed and approved. the father went to pick up his daughter, who is from yemen. ownn is so dangerous, our u.s. consulate has pulled out of that so they had interview in jordan. it was approved. they showed up at the airport. when they arrived, they were told the father can get on the plane because he is u.s. citizen, but the 12-year-old daughter has to stay behind. what is the father to do? right now him and his daughter are left in a desperate situation. he does not know what he can do. he cannot send her back to the danger that exists in yemen. citizena mother, a u.s. , and her six-year-old daughter is left in somalia. , visa an application petition has already been approved. the application went forward with the consulate. now president trump has said, no, these children are a threat to our national security because they come from predominantly muslim countries that have been tar

clearly with respect to due process, due process applies to citizens in the united states, residents the united states as well as individuals who have applied and been granted visas, the court was very clear on tha that. >> tucker: so people in foreign countries who are not u.s. citizens, they're not on u.s. soil but the constitutional protection that we enjoy as citizens apply to them, so would they have standing under the standard you just articulated to file suit against the u.s. government on the grounds that say we bump their country? iraqis with visas in hand because our protections by them, why wouldn't they be able to sue in federal court in the u.s. for waging war against them court to mark >> sure, your hypothetical is interesting, i think it is a world away from the executive order relating to immigration. it's related to immigration and the judge's ruling on due process made it clear that with respect to any person in the united states, citizens, residents, or folks who have been issued visas, whether they be in the state or not in the state, they are required under the l

citizens. i personally have been repeatedly surveillance and since the edward snowden episode and he went to russia, it seems as though the united states are very angry with russia for snowden being there. however, even our attorney general, eric holder, said that snowden gave united states citizens a service area and how do people who are being surveilled by our government and the why is this not a top concern in our country that our own country, such as myself. >> host: nx, explained to us. you say you think you've been under surveillance in the past, how do you know? >> caller: i've filed into the federal court in las vegas for domestic terrorism because of what happens is the local government has, like donald trump, i agree with him. take news to attack people, to slander their name, to tear them down. to have them wrongfully arrested, just like they did with martin luther king and malcom x. these are old tactics by the united states government that have been in place and of course, it's been with new technology, it has been on steroids. >>. >> host: one more question and we will get back to our guest but why you? you say you are b

united states workers. and the immigration, they don't realize that all the united states government wants is cheap labor. and to help ensure that the wisconsin and all of the other united states citizens are purchased as cheap labor as well. it's turning into a nation of forced servitude. host: thanks for calling, dawn. any thoughts? guest: a lot of themes packed in there. some very interesting points about economics and about wages and so on. i think to me one of the big questions about whether donald trump will flourish as a president, if i can put it that way, is what happens to some of these economic promises he made. about wages, about life getting better for workers in america. and to me that's going to be one of the big, big tests, very easy for a nationalistic, populist campaigner as he was to say, look, things are going to get better. i'm going to bring these jobs back. raise these wages. but actually some of the polls he's suggesting perhaps are not going to lead to that. that is one of the things that people are looking at. it may not play out very quickly, but one of the things that could be quite decisive in determining what happens to his presidency. host: back to europe

however our attorney general, eric holder, said that snowden did the united states citizens a service. how do people who are being surveillanced by our government, and why is this not the top concern in our country that our own country -- host: let's get a reply. annette, explain to us. you say you think you have been under surveillance in the past. how do you know? caller: i have filed into the federal court in las vegas for domestic terrorism. again the local government, like donald trump, i agree with him. they move to attack people, to slander their names, to pull them down, to have them falsely and wrongly arrested. martin they did with luther king and malcolm x. these are tactics by the united states government that have been in place. it's just been with new technology, it has actually been on steroids. host: one more question, and we will get back to our guest. but why you? caller: excuse me? host: you said you're being-duve under surveillance. why do you think that's the case? why you? caller: with dianne feinstein, i lived in sacramento, california. it was more -- it is one

problem is a domestic terrorism problem, all the attacks since 9/11 have been carried out by united states citizens. it's not a problem of people coming from outside, but a problem of people being radicalized here in the united states. let's leave aside the constitutionality question, the question becomes is a ban really going to deal with a problem that it's supposed to deal with? >> it's lopsided according to you, right? lo lopsided banning those versus what's on the list. >> right. if indeed french terrorists are a real problem obviously we have no fly list. to me the list is like saying we have a problem with central american gangs which is true and saying as a result we're going to make it impossible for having people from argentina from visiting. you see potential radicalization either to themselves or reach out to authorities or ngos that's the main problem. this ban is not going to deal with the problem everybody is concerned about, which is domestic home grown terrorism in this country. we haven't been attacked from the outside since 9/11. that's the old view of what happens. what happens

united states in the 1930's. estimate almost 60% of those that were deported were united states citizens. d they were deported for but one reason -- they just happened to be of mmexican descent.. amy: the state of california went on to issue a formal apology for its role in the expulsions and built a memorial in downtown los angeles to commemorate the victims. but many fear that history is now on the verge or repeating itself are ready. for more, we go to los angeles, california, where we're joined by the preeminent scholar on this often overlooked chapter of american history, francisco balderrama, professor of american history and chicano studies at california state university, los angeles. he is co-author of "decade of betrayal: mexican repatriation in the 1930's." professor balderrama, welcome to democracy now! i think for many, especially young people, but i am sure many more, do not know this chapter of american history. can you lay it o out for u us wt actually h happened yethough >> you are right that it is largely not known and in the larger american socociety, the mexican nation a

united states. friends and fellow citizens: the period for a new election of a citizen to administer the executive government of the united states being not far distant, and the time actually arrived when your thoughts must be employed in designating the person who is to be clothed with that important trust, it appears to me proper, especially as it may conduce to a more distinct expression of the public voice, that i should now apprise you of the resolution i have formed to decline being considered among the number of those out of whom a choice is to be made. i beg you, at the same time, to do me the justice to be do me the justice to be . >> the senate will come to order pursuant to as amended by february 1st comeuppance the senator fromm nebraska will now read washington's farewell address.on of ze >> to the people of the united states, france and fellow citizens to administer with the executive appointment of the united states and the time arrives when thoughts must me applied to designate a person to be closed with that trust. appears to be proper to a more urd distinct expressionreg in to the number of

this woman, that identified herself as his mother, said he is a united states citizen. >> that's being racist. >> reporter: court records show a bench warrant was issued for his arrest after he failed to show up in court on charges of burglary and possession of a controlled substance, meth. >>> thank you. it's a mild day out there. lots of sunshine. it started off cold. lots of valley fog in the morning. temperatures in the mid to upper 50s. not a very warm day. but it's going to warm up a bit each day this week. it's going to get book to the -- back to the mid 60s in some spots later in the week. you see this trough here, you have a bunch of activity by phoenix and los angeles. that's the system that went through yesterday. it's moving out to the plains causing severe weather. for us we are into this dry high pressure pattern, it's giving us a nice set up with cool overnight lows and light winds, these winds are light and they are going to be lighter into the evening hours, overnight lows get down into the mid to lower 30s. right now it's 53 in napa. this is a live camera shot. there

clearly with respect to due process, due process applies to citizens in the united states, residents the united states as well as individuals who have applied and been granted visas, the court was very clear on na >> tucker: so people in foreign countries who are not u.s. citizens, they're not on u.s. soil but the constitutional protection that we enjoy as citizens apply to them, so would they have standing under the standard you just articulated to file suit against the u.s. government on the grounds that say we bump their country? f iraqis with visas in hand because our protections by them, why wouldn't they be able to sue in federal court in the u.s. for waging war against them court to >> sure, your hypothetical is interesting, i think it is a world away from the executive order relating to immigration. it's related to immigration and the judge's ruling on due process made it clear that withr respect to any person in the united states, citizens, residents, or folks who have been issued visas, whether they be in the state or not in the state, they are required under the law to be

he became a united states citizen in 1990 and raised his family here in palacios.d you arrive in this country? >> i left my country in 1979. >> how old were you when you got here? >> 21 years old. >> you were 21. so, why shrimp? how did you come to this business? >> because my cousin. >> cousin, okay. >> he was living here. and i work on the job first. but my cousin told me that it's very good for shrimpers. make money more. ♪ >> back on dry land, vin's first stop is the point, the town's general store. it's owned and operated by pillars of the community, yen and brian tran, who separately came over from vietnam around the same time, met, married and raised three children here. >> visit to follow my dream. i came here with nothing, 17 years old. first job i ever work is washing dishes. so, my boss told me, say hey, you're a hard worker. you know, maybe one day you're going to be the boss. so, i have a thing in my mind. after i get married, i told my wife, open a restaurant. and she stopped me, said no, you're crazy! so, after all my kids went to college, they got a

the ways our government and our governments together can benefit stips of both the united states and canada -- citizens of the both the united states and canada and in doing so advance the greater peace and stability of the world. mr. prime minister, i look forward to working closely with you to build upon our very historic friendship. there are incredible possibilities for us to pursue. canada and the united states together. again, thank you for joining us. and i know our discussions will be very, very productive for the future of both countries. mr. prime minister. >> thank you mr. president. good afternoon, everyone. thank you very much for joining us. i would first like to start by extending aye my sincere thanks to president trump for inviting me down to washington. any day i get to visit our southern neighbors is a good day in my books, particularly when it's so nice and warm compared to what it is back home. we are suffering under a significant winter storm that's hitting our atlantic provinces particularly harsh. i want to send everyone back at home my thoughts as they shovel out and impress on

don't even know, who's country won't even tell us who that person is, has primacy over the united states citizensited states testers to help the federal judge while you under section 8 about our growth article one of the constitution of the united states that has primacy and gives the president the power? that is hogwash! the supreme court will give trump the win on this. >> bill: even though it is four liberal justices. >> i think of the liberal justices understand the constitution. this is not a close one, bill. >> bill: tomorrow night, on your fine program, saturday night at 9:00 -- you owe me big for that -- i'm sorry, saturday. i am just hoping it is friday. you will deal with his ivanka trump thing. now, nordstrom's said, we ask for a statement, they said, we made this decision based on performance over the past year, sales of the brand declines to the point where it didn't make good business sense for us to continue with the line. now, everybody is mad at nordstrom because they are saying is a political deal. you say? >> i say that nordstrom is responding to the demands of a group on socia

i want them to be in my shoes now where i am a united states citizen. >>> yesterday we learned that 16 participate in saturday's mummer's mardi gras parade. this is what it looked like last year at the mummers parade. this year the parade will start at 11:00 a.m. on saturday and the mummers will strut down main street. >>> a permanent marker honors the legacy of an african-american woman who made a difference in wilmington. she was the first african-american women elected to wilmington's city council. her daughter says she hopes her grandmother continues to inspire others. >> we hope this inspires other members of the city to reach for the goals and to strive for the things on this wall. >> she filled a midterm vacancy. she was later reelected for two more terms. >>> this is your last chance to see the iconic love sculpture, at least for a little while. the center city landmark gets moved out of its temporary home tomorrow. it will be cleaned and repainted before it takes its place in the redesigned love park this spring. to mark valentine's day, people who visit can expect music and f

when proclaiming raul wallenberg a united states citizen, president reagan asked, how can we comprehend the moral worth of a man who saved tens and tens of thousands of lives, including those of congressman and mrs. lantos. we cannot possibly comprehend raul wallenberg's moral worth, mr. speaker, but we must ask ourselves what our moral worth is if we don't do everything in our power to end this 72-year search for answers. i have presented a bipartisan resolution, house resolution 58, which seeks to raise awareness of the wallenberg case. this resolution builds upon the tireless efforts of so many. wallenberg's parents, his half brother, his daughters, and raul's half sister. it was nina, mr. speaker, who served as a guest of honor at the congressional gold medal ceremony in this building in 2012. this resolution builds upon the tremendous research by the scholars and volunteers over the years by raising outstanding questions that linger to this very day. the resolution also urges the administration from the president on down to raise the case of wallenberg to their russian counterparts

don't even know, who's country won't even tell us who that person is, has primacy over the united states citizensnd of the presidency of united states testers to help the federal judge while you under section 8 about our growth article one of the constitution of the united states that has primacy and gives the president the power? that is hogwash! the supreme court will give trump the win on this. >> bill: even though it is four liberal justices. >> i think of the liberal justices understand the constitution. this is not a close one, bill. >> bill: tomorrow night, on your fine program, saturday night at 9:00 -- you owe me big for that -- i'm sorry, saturday. i am just hoping it is friday. you will deal with his ivanka trump thing. now, nordstrom's said, we ask for a statement, they said, we made this decision based on performance over the past year, sales of the brand declines to the point where it didn't make good business sense for us to continue with the line. now, everybody is mad at nordstrom because they are saying is a political deal. you say? >> i say that nordstrom is responding to the d

those boys say they plan to sign up and plan to become a naturalized united states citizen in due course. live at dulles airport, peggy fox, wusa9. >> the legal fight over president trump's travel ban is focused on an appellate court in san francisco. >> attorney generals from 15 states have filed briefs in support of lawsuits -- 97 american companies are challenging the ban saying bad for business. visa holders from seven majority muslim countries are allowed to enter the u.s. today is the deadline for the justice department to file its response to the lawsuits. we're hearing from some people who wonder just how a judge can overturn well article 3 of the constitution addresses that issue. federal courts have the power to interpret the constitution and they can declare an executive order illegal or unconstitutional. article 3 also gives the courts jurisdiction in all cases where the united states is a party. president trump's executive order is likely to end up in the supreme court. >>> cleanup is underway at savoy elementary school after bedbugs found at the school on friday. getting ri

probably not should not have or should be very careful with about the private conversations of united states citizenion is doubly disturbing of the kind of protections that intelligence agencies are just providing and it leaked out. that may be a crime. the question becomes, was mike flynn sinned against more than sending? >> tucker: can you get a handle on the federal government that does not want you to run it? if you have all these permanent bureaucrats, some of them smart, knowledgeable talented who do not want your foreign policy, and reject your views can you effectually use your views? >> very good question, sure they are worried about it in the white house. i saw an article, the difficulties the president might be having, staffing the national security council. the national security council staff, morphed into this great big agency relying on people who are drawn from agencies around the government, they are borrowed to work on the nsc. the story said that some of these people asked to be returned to their agencies because they did not want to work for donald trump, well, who did they think

title 9 protecting the united states citizens from sexual discrimination. does it also apply to gender identity? that's the sole issue here. there are arguments on both sides. until the supreme court or congress makes the determination or decision of awe on this, it's up in flux. so while the obama administration said it's our interpretation of title 9, that it does protect gender identity, the administration says no, leave it to the individual states and the individual school districts to decide their educational policies, so you see, we have a major issue here. it's a hard issue and there's passion on both issues. and george takei stated it's not about the bathroom like it was not about water fountains. the moral issue here, issues to try to protect people's rights and there's a short-term solution to long-term. the long-term is when the supreme court or legislature to not a clear law on this. short-term, you know, fred, let's be realistic. it's like you have family bathroom. you have multiuse. have a bathroom, a single bathroom that anybody can use. that

i want them to be in my shoes now, where i'm a united states citizen. >> reporter: matt delucia, nbcunday. this morning we're thinking spring. so can we put winter behind us? nbc 10's katy zachry is live along kelly drive. you and i grew up in the philly area. i'm sure you remember the blizzard of '93. took us out of school for about a week in march. crossing our fingers there. >> reporter: how can we forget that? we can easily for get it on a day like today. coming up after the break, we'll have advice for making the most of this spring-like weather and tell you where the crowd is already gathering. that has more ski mountains to choose from than any other in the country. ♪ and that's not the only thing you can only find in new york state. you can find it all, only in new york. new york. it's all here. it's only here. plan your winter getaway at iloveny.com delsym helpswhich means, impulse to cough for 12 hours. you're controlling your cough on your morning commute. and later when you're joking with beth... even when most cough medicines stop, delsym is still working. delsym. the #1

you're impacting often times a whole family, many of whom are united states citizens. >> congressman joaquin castro, thanks for your time. appreciate it. >> thank you. >>> joining me now, maria hinojosa, founder and president of futuro group and the senior president of the hispanic chamber of commerce a member of the trump diversity coalition. javier, we have spoken before during different iterations of your relationship with the now president. you were open to him, you were a critic, you're now on this committee. the memo that -- the details, the trump administration says they are not considering this but they are clearly massively expanding the category of people they are tart getting for deportation and they're implementing that. i want to begin, chris, by saying i'm not a politician, i'm not a pundit. i am a person and i am a person who is the child of immigrants, mexican immigrants, in fact. i grew up as a migrant farm worker. i dropped out of school because i had to work. i learned english as a second language so i understand very clearly what it feels like to be disenfranchise

i want them to be in my shoes now, where i'm a united states citizen. >> reporter: matt delucia, nbc 10 news. >>> today in philadelphia you can get into the mardi gras spirit a little early with a parade on south street. the musicians begin at fat tuesday's and will play traditional new orleans music as they march past the other bars and restaurants along south street. >>> the one and only mummers took over manna euning for the neighborhood's third annual mardi gras parade. the parade doubled as a fund-raisers for the mummers new year's day parade. >>> 6:27 right now on this sunday. we're tracking near record warm temperatures for a second day in a row. nbc 10's katy zachry is checking in with folks getting an early start along kelly drive. >> reporter: you know it's going to be a good day when we're in the middle of winter, you can still step outside first thing in the morning in just a fleece. we're talking to people along philadelphia's iconic kelly drive about their plans for the day. >> today we're tracking near record and record temperatures. we're looking at mild air moving ba

united states of america. set a north to protect and serve the citizens of the united states of america. you have someone who was ordered deported who voted in elections twice which is voter fraud and you need to really go into that, check that out. you need to ask your citizens io your district to check who's registered to vote at their residence to make sure there's not people voting illegally. and with that oath of the united states of america and to, you can't work for people that are in the country illegally. they're criminals. and all i see is few and other representatives standing up for people that are in the united states illegally and they're trying to change the constitution of the united states of america. >> okay, we'll leave it there. >> guest: it's a question that gets posed a lot of times all members of congress by particular those of us who are from southwest, those of us who happen to be latino and representative of that community. the question about fidelity to the country when you take the oath. we take the same of the we'll believe it. i think what is going on now is

i think there's a concern for people who are already in the country, that are united states citizens.t were we doing to address that. >> you are somebody who's been a trump supporter. you the voted for him. what do you think? >> well, i hate it when it's called a muslim ban, because, you know, we had a couple muslims in the office that are the sweetest people in the world and were shot by another islamist, whatever you want to call him. so i had to go look into the law a little bit more. okay, these are countries that don't have very stable governments, you don't have good information abilities to screen people from those countries. that's the rationale i saw. >> is there not a danger that by being this tough on these countries and maybe doing too much of a broad brush, could you blind wind up creating more terrorists? >> if that's what's trumped up to use as a recruiting people, it's possible. but they haven't had an air forbes sin force since 1978 because of severe screening. >> a lot of trump supporters are happy about this. they feel like obama wasn't paying attention. trump is pa

when a united states citizen is picked up in one of these communications, the transcript is supposederson's name and that part of the communication. someone has to show a need-to-know to get that information unredacted. that must have happened here with michael flynn. we don't know the details. when the information was first circulated should have had anything from the u.s. citizen redacted. >> harris: thanks, aaron. we appreciate your time. >> absolutely. >> harris: a millionaire, a murder and a former friend with former insider testimony. next, developments in the trial of robert dirst is back in the news. trust #1 doctor recommended dulcolax. use dulcolax tablets for gentle dependable relief. suppositories for relief in minutes. and dulcoease for comfortable relief of hard stools. dulcolax. designed for dependable relief. tech: don't let a cracked windshtrust safelite.plans. with safelite's exclusive "on my way text"... you'll know exactly when we'll be there. giving you more time for what matters most. (team sing) safelite repair, safelite replace. dude. your crunching's scaring

president of the united states invested 550 entities and all different countries throughout the world, we don't know what the specifics are of that and we have a right to know as united states citizens. not as democrats or republicans. but as citizens. very, very clear. and article one, section 9, of the constitution, the moments says very, very specifically what the president can do and what we can't do and officials of the executive branch of government. in terms of foreign powers. we have the power, we have the authority. the chairman, who i have written to on february 1st, kevin brady from texas has the ability to say we will look into this. and decide after looking into it if we should make it public. we did this three years ago with the irs people. 51 members who -- employees of the irs were investigated when looking at the lowest learner about her involvement in whether she was prejudicial looking at this group. >> has this ever been used on a president? >> yes, it has. >> harry truman, excuse me, richard nixon, $500,000 he owed in past taxes and looked into it. i'm not so much concerned about how much tax the president owes to the government, whether he does or not, i do not

a pain everything you do, you, chris lu, everyone in that white house is property of the united states citizens. it has to be preserved and this is something that comes from the "washington post." staffers are so fearful of being accused of talking to the media some have resorted to a chat yap that disappears. that's a violation of the records act. >> it's a violation. in 2014 congress passed an amendment to the records act that included electronic text messages and if you text you have to keep a record of that or forward to that to some other system where it can be track sod a system that automatically deletes it, absolutely violates the presidential records act. >> and i mean i think people are probably watching this and thinking giving what we're dealing with, the presidential records act, but it is the law for the white house staffers and there has to be some culture and compliance in which you obey the law. >> chris, why would this surprise you? you have kellyanne conway standing in the white house press briefing room hawking ivanka trump's products when she is apparently counseled you the

all graduating seniors must be able to pass the same test required of a new united states citizen. this is common sense and i think it is more crucial and important to healthy political debate than ever. it was john adams who once said that all children should be educated and instructed in the principles of freedom. i think that is something that we can all agree on. how can we expect our children to protect the principles on which this country was founded if they don't even know what those principles are. we talk a lot about how important it is to vote, to be a good citizen. to get involved in public service. we tell young people that it is your civic duty, it is your responsibility. and yet after every election we are disheartened by low youth voter turnout. we expect them to do their part, but i would challenge all the governors here, who have wheeled on our part? -- here, have we all done our part? we saw only 59% of eligible voters actually cast a ballot. meanwhile, as governor nixon mentioned in the video, numerous studies and surveys show that a majority of americans lack th

no one, no one has the right to enter the united states unless he or a citizen of the united states. so, does the commander-in-chief have the authority to impose the 90-day ban? every president has live latitude to protect the homeland, and no one, no one has the right to usurp that presidential authority. section 212f of the immigration and nationality act of 1952 codified under title 8 of the united states code chapter 12f says yes, every president since jimmy carter and including barack obama has used this statute to prohibit entry to certain individuals whose entry would be contrary to your national interest. some presidents used it to a greater extent than others. but the actions were legal. every president has the inherent right in his foreign affairs power, the ability to exclude people who may cause harm to you. and if that power isn't enough for you, congress added its own bill signed into law that a president has a foreign affairs power the ability to do just that. and that power has never ever been successfully challenged. article 2, section 269 constitution gives the pres

as president you have to protect united states citizens right and among them the right to freedom of expression. i think it is a slippery slope it is happening here and in europe when individuals do things that may rate angry response somewhere else in the world where they call and tell them to go ahead without being clear about what they were here doing. they are asking citizens to surre surrender their fundamental rights. >> the gentlemen four up and two in from the bottom. right there. >> my name is steven short. my question is does the president know we are having this discussion? >> watch your tweets! >> well, a good friend of mine works in the nsc and he probably does. >> he could be watching! >> gentlemen in the front here. yeah. there is more than one. the man in the middle. i am using the random process. >> herb rose. i come from a background where my father read one newspaper on the way to work and he took the subway. he read another newspaper on the way home from work. in my high school, you could get a subscription to "the new york times," i think something like 25 or 30

united states. nations belong to citizens.not what it should be because there is hunger, there is poverty. there are also abuses, systemic abuses carried out by your security forces and there is corruption. sure. all that comes from maureen meyer who has researched this from the washington office of latin america. mexico has a problem, would you agree? if we have a problem, we have to correct them. but that does not give trump the right to intervene in our internal public policies. that does not give him the right to treat inhumanely most people from anywhere of the world. mexico has to correct, yes, the problem of drugs and violence and we are going to legalise drug consumption so that we take away