coming in that nicolas cage has broken in to the national archives and has stolen the constitution of the united statesinto that camera and convince nicolas cage to give that constitution back. >> nicholas, bring back our constitution! i respect you, cage, but get a grip. i've instructed the united states military, the fbi, the cia, to do everything in their power to bring that constitution back. >> okay, sir. i have an update. good news and bad news. which do you want first? >> let's start with the good news. >> good news is, you got him, congratulations, sir. >> we've got him. >> do you want the bad news? >> yes. >> he didn't have the constitution, sir. >> he didn't have it? he didn't have the constitution? >> no, he didn't have it. so you now have to address nicolas cage fans all over the world and explain to him why you killed their favorite actor, three, two, one, go.ç >> my bad. >> herman cain us on fire on "the daily show" interviews. >>> still ahead on "way too early," tweets, texts, and e-mails next and "morning joe" moments away. ♪ why not make lunch more than just lunch? with two times the

i do solemnly of firma but i will support and defend the constitution of the united states and the constitution of the state of california against all enemies, foreign and domestic, that will bear -- to the constitution of the united states and the constitution of the state of california. that i take this obligation freely without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion. i will faithfully discharge the duties upon which i am about to enter during such time as i hold the office of -- for the city and county of san francisco. congratulations and thank you. [applause] >> we came to seven straight about 10 years ago. -- 7th street about 10 years ago. the environment is huge. it is stronger than willpower. surrounding yourself with artists, being in a culture where artists are driving, and where a huge amount of them is a healthy environment. >> you are making it safer. push, push. that is better. when i start thinking, i see it actually -- sometimes, i do not see it, but when i do, it is usually from the inside out. it is like watching something being spawned. you go in, and you begin to work,

scheme, as well as any other laws in this country ultimately have to be consistent with the united states constitutionit's what the supreme court did hear. we need to honor that and we need to recognize that. >> in terms of research, i'm curious, is there a link between youth and adult behavior? is there a way to know a 14-year-old criminal or violent offender may behave later in life as an adult? >> you know, it's very difficult to predict that. we know that 90% of juvenile offenders don't reoffend. i think the notion that we are creating or we have a generation of hard core criminals who, if we let them out will reoffend is wrong. i think what's behind the supreme court decision is this understanding it is difficult to predict future behavior. we don't want to make a decision on day one that forces kids to die in prison because we have made a wrong judgment about their future behavior. >> preernt your time this morning. >> thank you. >>> dozens of people tripping on that same step. now, the steps days are numbers. >>> have you ever happened to trip in the same spot over and over? well, it is not jus

what's more, the 10th amendment of the united states constitution, powers not delegated to the united states by the constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively or to the people. mr. speaker, this is important. i would encourage my colleagues to go back and look at the history books because the only reason the constitution was ratified in this country was because of the promise that the bill of rights would be ratified right behind it. know that. and if you dispute that, mr. speaker, you've got my email address, it's woodall @mail.house.gov. my web address is wood y'all.house.gov. let me know where you think i've gone wrong. the united states constitution would not have been ratified by the states without the addition, the commitment that the bill of rights would be ratified right behind it. that's where the 10th amendment comes from. that's where the 10th amendment comes from. no one was worried about state governments getting out of control in 1787. they were worried about a tyrannical federal government in 1787. and i would say rightly s

the right to counsel was guaranteed by the united states constitution.andated service that the city and county provides. as you might imagine, in this time, particularly given the economy, there has been a great demand for our services on every front. so, today i would like to give you an overview of our budgetary challenges and initiatives for the next two years. the second slide shows our budget over the next two years. you can see that. 92% of our budget goes to pay salaries and benefits. 3.5% goes to non-personal services. this includes the cost of our lease, and the space at 577 street, with reproduction mail services. only 25% goes to material and supplies. in terms of the major initiatives that the department will be engaging in over the next two years, i am very happy to announce that in july of 2012, we will be implementing the tracking and management system. the part of the system that all the criminal justice agencies have been working on. it seems like forever, but it has been the past 10 years. our system is ready to launch your -- ready to

emancipation in time of peace, it only applies in time of war and that is why an amendment to the united states constitution becomes a focus for lincoln and the republican party so soon after the passage of the emancipation. if it's going to last into peacetime you need something else. it will take an amendment. it means the other thing to remember about this as a military measure it means nothing unless the union wins. if the confederacy wins, then the proclamation is exactly what some confederate leaders called it as effective as pope's control over a comet. you know from our discussion last week that and earlier today that a factor in winning was go withing to be manpower. who could keep armies in the field the longest. and by 1862, everybody's having a harder time of that. you know that the confederates had a draft in april 1862. the union hasn't had the draft yet but it's having a harder time than it did april 1861 getting men to volunteer. there is one pool of willing recruits, however. that the union forces have not yet tap tapped. in 1862 into 1863 is the year, is the time in which this pool will be

i do solemnly of firma but i will support and defend the constitution of the united states and the constitution of the state of california against all enemies, foreign and domestic, that will bear -- to the constitution of the united states and the constitution of the state of california. that i take this obligation freely without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion. i will faithfully discharge the duties upon which i am about to enter during such time as i hold the office of -- for the city and county of san francisco. congratulations and thank you. [applause] >> good morning and welcome to the first annuallove your parks day in san francisco. welcome. my name is matt o'brady, the newest kid on the block looking to improve our parks city-wide. we have a new display area. we will get the dignitary speaking over quickly. without further reduced -- without further ado, i will hand this over to the director of the recreation and parks department. phil? >> thank you. good morning. pick it up. is beautiful out. it is great to be here. is a gorgeous day. -- it is a gorgeous day. this is the

was going to be upheld because if nothing else, the necessary and proper clause of the united states constitution. but the more we analyzed this and saw this, we knew that our fight was for a just cause because of that one very simple notion, and that is if congress can force you to buy product against your will, there will be no limits whatsoever to congressional power and it will fundamentally change the relationship between individuals and the federal government forevermore. so we were very pleased to see that the united states supreme court itself articulated the very positions that we had maintained all along in arriving at its conclusion that in fact, congress had violated the constitution, trampled our individual rights by trying to impose the individual mandate. of course, that victory turned out to be a hollow victory because of what the remainder of the decision looked like. however, i think that we would be ignoring the shift in constitutional history that took place yesterday if we don't recognize some silver linings concerning the ruling on the individual mandate. one, it was a meani

remind audience, is the american indians are the only ones mentioned in article 6 of the united states constitution where, in fact, the quote is to honor all treaties made by this government and the united states of america. so, when we go to washington, d.c., and we're always in washington, d.c. trying to get one more penny for health care, one more penny for education. the question arises, if we are mentioned in the constitution of this country's founding documents, why are we always hustling around trying to get more money to address the poverty in our communities? the other thing i want to be very clear is that we have at this point, that the majority of the women who work in tribal communities are women. and most of them are college graduates in our tribal community are women. many of the positions held in our tribal communities, whether they be principals, superintendents or teachers are women. so, when you take a look at this huge leadership amongest women in our tribal communities, you know, when people say why are women, indian women taking the lead? we have a lot of entrepreneurs. we have

presidency because he set for himself an amazing project which is to create an archive of the united states constitutional convention. as you look around, you see some of the work, some of the thought he put into that. he had taken very careful notes at the constitutional convention and he went back over those notes. he expanded them and wrote them out carefully, added annotation. in other cases he wrote to other delegates or their families asking if they still had a copy of the speech that was given at the convention. by the end of his life, madison had put together a thorough record of the constitutional convention. it filled almost a thousand pages. for him this was an important part of the legacy of the founding of america, because when he had been preparing for that convention he had carried out a great deal of research to find out how other attempts at self government, at confederations had been created and what was the intentions of those creators and had come up blank. there were no records. madison read a little introduction to this and described his goal as providing a record for those who in ot

vote of no confidence, that it does seem to me that one of the very bad features of the united states constitution is the rigidly fixed term presidency because if we do have a president whom we view is incompetent or just prone to dad judgment, which i think incidentally is worse than being a crook, or worse than running afoul of some lawyer's reading of what a high crime ph. misdemeanor, then i wish we had a way to get rid of a president. i'm not sure that the california system of recalling a government for is exactly the betts way to do it. but then again i have -- they do provide a variety of solutions to the problem of political leadership in whom one has lost confidence. >> professor, i enjoyed your remarks, but there's one point i'm kind of getting stuck on. you sketched out the founder's vision -- assuming that that's true, isn't the stakes too high for domestic policy? the structural setup that we have for the presidency, isn't it inevery tabl that you're going to get a president that's very -- >> i think that's a great point because we you know we have a political system now where we hold

specific weight unit of gold and earlier silver, as required by article 1 section 8 of the united states constitution, the supreme law of the land, congress would again establish by statute after due deliberation the sustainable gold value of the dollar, that is to say the convertibility points of the dollar to gold. third, by international gold standard is it meant that gold, not paper dollars nor any other currency nor the special drawing rights of the international monetary fund, so-called sdrs, only gold would be the primary means by which nations settle their residual balance of payment deficit in order to rebalance world trade as it has not been since 1914. the gold monetary standard was proven in the only laboratory available to human beings, the laboratory of 3,000 years of human history. the gold standard was universally accepted money. it is the necessary remedy for the defect of unstable floating depreciating, manipulated central bank paper currencies of today. it is the primary cause of today's currency wars and of systemic inflation and deflation. indeed, the federal reserve system, amer

it accomplished that objective by -- locate within the united states where constitutional protections apply and those outside the united states where surveilled only after the government puts together a volume nice application. the fisa court and the government should look at, including the type of communications technology that the target was using, whether communicating by wire, or by satelli satellite -- with the change in technology through the intervening years, the government countdown itself expending significant manpower generating fisa court applications for surveillance against person outside the united states. in increase forced to make tough choices. to its enduring secret congress recognized this this situation was untenable. it authorized the fisa court to approve -- overseas without providing the government to prevent a -- fisa back in line with its original attempt. second, he established a pull mully level of system by the fisa court, by congress and by various actors within the executive branch to approve that this authority would be exercise. and third, significantl

united states constitution as american citizens can go anywhere. clay works out a very convoluted answer to that that satisfies everybody and satisfies nobody. at the same time it ends the crisis. he hopes slavery will not be an issue. to clay, slavery is the real thorn in his side. he can never come up with a solution on that. and if it's a wound, it's a self-inflicted wound because clay was a slave holder. >> that makes it difficult to please. he starts out believing he is an emancipationist and is on the north side. it is a no-win situation for him. >> we are halfway through our 90-minute discussion on the life and times of the contender, henry clay who ran for the white house throughout most of his political career. five times in total. three times as his party's nominee. unsuccessful all the while. but the great effect on the direction and future of his country. we are going to take a very short break and be back at ashland, his home, in lexington, kentucky, to talk more. welcome back to ashland. the home of henry clay in lexington, kentucky,

coming in that nicholas cage has broken into the national archives and has stolen the constitution of the united statesnto that camera, and convince nicholas cage to give that constitution back. >> nicholas, bring back our constitution. i respect you, cage, but get a grip. i have instructed the united states military, the fbi, the cia to do everything in their power to bring that constitution back. >> okay, sir, i have an update. good news and bad news. which do you want first. >> let's start with the good news. >> good news is you got him. congratulations, sir. >> we got him. >> dow want the bad news it? >> yes. >> he didn't have the constitution, sir. >> he didn't have it. >> he didn't have the constitution? >> no, he didn't have it. >> so you now have to address nicholas cage fans all over the world and explain to them why you killed their favorite actor, three, two, one, go. >> my bad. (laughter) >> next time on herman cain, an american presidency, a different crisis. >> america will not negotiate with moon nazis. (cheers and applause) >> jon: welcome back. my guest tonight, a band whose new album

we should never amend the first amendment to the united states constitution.tha: always a pleasure to talk to you. thank you. we'll see you soon stphaofplt . bill: we are getting word that there will not be a ruling from the u.s. supreme court on the healthcare law. it's coming. no matter what the outcome they say healthcare will never be the same. new fears of all out civil war in syria. will the rest of the world step in to stop the massacre? >> wwe are concerned about the latest information that we have that there are attack helicopters on the way from russia to syria, which will escalate the conflict quite dramatically. ♪ ♪ we all need it. to move. to keep warm. to keep us fed. to make clay piggies. but to keep doing these things in the future... at shell, we believe the world needs a broader mix of energies. that's why we're supplying natural gas to generate cleaner electricity... that has around 50% fewer co2 emissions than coal. and it's also why, with our partner in brazil, shell is producing ethanol - a biofuel made from renewable sugarcane. ♪ >>a min

the united states constitution.s coming up. >>> and in the "rewrite" tonight, the moment that rewrites your future. the letter that changes your life. [ female announcer ] to get a professional cleansing system you could spend as much as $200. olay says challenge that with an instrument that cleanses as effectively as what's sold by skin professionals for a whole lot less. olay pro x advanced cleansing system. ♪ spread a little love my way ♪ ♪ spread a little something to remember ♪ [ female announcer ] fresh milk and real cream makes philadelphia and the moment a little richer. makes philadelphia and the moment [ creaking ] [ male announcer ] trophies and awards lift you up. but they can also hold you back. unless you ask, what's next? [ zapping ] [ clang ] this is the next level of performance. the next level of innovation. the next rx. the all-new f sport. this is the pursuit of perfection. in here, great food demands a great presentation. so at&t showed corporate caterers how to better collaborate by using a mob

conquer no compromise crap, if they had been in control, there never would have been a united states constitution. >> mayor barrett joins us for an exclusive interview tonight. wake up! that's good morning, veggie style. hmmm. for half the calories plus veggie nutrition. could've had a v8. mcallen, texas. in here, heavy rental equipment in the middle of nowhere, is always headed somewhere. to give it a sense of direction, at&t created a mobile asset solution to protect and track everything. so every piece of equipment knows where it is, how it's doing or where it goes next. ♪ this is the bell on the cat. [ male announcer ] it's a network of possibilities -- helping you do what you do... even better. ♪ >>> folks, have you checked us out on facebook at the "politicsnation" page? the conversation is always going on. today a lot of people were talking about the big news in the trayvon martin case. we want all of you to join us. head to facebook, search for "politicsnation," and like us to be part of the "politicsnation" conversation. we hope to see you there. germ party! eww! now the colgate total mo

i --is a solemn lease where -- that i support and defend -- the constitution of the united states and u!çthat iççç wir trueçççççç faith and alleo the constitution of theççççd çççstates and the constitutif çççsthte ofç california -- t çççsthisçw3 obalifornia -- t or purpose of evasion -- and that i will well and faithfully discharge --q which i am about to enter -- s i hold the office of -- ççóçççcity admi for theççç;ççóçç city andn ççç[cheers and applause] >> ladies and gentlemen, history in our city is being made again, welcome the new city administrator, naomi kelly. [applause] >> thank you. w3ççñrççthank you, mr. mayof supervisors, members of the community, colleagues, and friends. i am very pleased to deliver my first remarks as your new city administrator. [applause] t(çççççthis has beenççxd. earlier today,ç i am sure you heard t, downxdç proposition 8,çç and affirming judgeççç walker's decisiní. [applause] in their ruling, the court started out that proposition 8 served no purpose and had no effect other than to lessen the

have something called separation of powers, we have checks and balances, and we have the united states constitutionlanny. congress passes laws, the president signs those bills into law. the president does not have the right unilaterally to declare he is not going to enforce the law and that's what the president has done here. that's what he's done with the defense of marriage act, and then he basically snubs the supreme court by basically saying we're not even going to take arizona's calls. and you can't sit there and defend as a lawyer a president ignoring what is clear precedence as it relates to his duties with the constitution. >> okay. now let me give you the facts. i understand your rhetoric but here are the facts. over 1 million people were deported in the last three years by the obama administration. fact two, the supreme court itself said -- >> the president said he's -- >> let me finish. >> the president said he's not going to enforce it. >> i'm going to get to that. fact 2 is the supreme court itself said let's be cautious about enforcing this law of these reasonable stops because it's v

the united states constitution.t's coming up. >>> and in the "rewrite" tonight, the moment that rewrites your future. the letter that changes your life. [ male announcer ] what's in your energy drink? ♪ power surge, let it blow your mind. [ male announcer ] for fruits, veggies and natural green tea energy... new v8 v-fusion plus energy. could've had a v8. with less chronic osteoarthritis pain. imagine living your life with less chronic low back pain. imagine you, with less pain. cymbalta can help. cymbalta is fda-approved to manage chronic musculoskeletal pain. one non-narcotic pill a day, every day, can help reduce this pain. tell your doctor right away if your mood worsens, you have unusual changes in mood or behavior or thoughts of suicide. antidepressants can increase these in children, teens, and young adults. cymbalta is not approved for children under 18. people taking maois or thioridazine or with uncontrolled glaucoma should not take cymbalta. taking it with nsaid pain relievers, aspirin, or blood thinners

the supreme court decides whether a law is valid by the letter of the united states constitution. ere is no more debate over the affordable care act. it is constitutional. this is a day of vindication in my respects. every democratic president since franklin roosevelt had health care reform on their agenda. there's a feeling among the democrats here in washington that they have really accomplished something that is going to be great for generations to come. as joe biden said, leaving out the f-word, this really is a big deal. get your cell phones out, i want to know what you think tonight, did the supreme court make the right decision, text a for yes, b for no, you can always go to ç our blog, we'll bring you the results later on in the show. >>> i'm joined tonight by the senior democrat on the house education and workforce committee, george miller of california and howard dean, former governor of vermont and chairman of the dnc. congressman, let me start with you. i believe if i have my numbers right, 38 years ago you were elected to the congress, you wanted to stop the war in vie

. >> shepard: george, washington's personal copy of the united states constitution is going on auctiontion house predicts the document will sell for between $2 millioned and $3 million. it has president washington's hand written notes in the margin and comes with an early draft of the bill of rights. before we go our top five things of the day. number five, darth vader kid who starred in a super bowl condition that went viral about to undergo heart commercial. says he feels strong. >>> scientists discovered more than 10,000 different species of microbes living in and on the average healthy person. >>> police in buffalo, new york, looking for a trauma surgeon in connection with a deadly shooting at a hospital. >>> lance armstrong once again facing allegations of doping. he denies it. the head of jp morgan chase says some executives may lose pay after the company admitted last month it lost at least $2 billion on risky trades and that "the fox report" top five. on this day in 1994 jurors handed down a couple of verdicts in connection with the exxon valdez oil disaster and ruled exxon was

constitutional question and that is on a 5-4 vote that the tax and spend clause of the united states constitution authorizes the congress to do that. that doesn't mean it is a good idea and that doesn't mean that this unpopular and it has been unpopular from the time it was passed. it is no more popular today among the american people -- >> neil: are you disappointed in justice roberts? he shocked a lot of people. >> i think justice roberts did what he thought was right. he clearly said the necessary and proper clause and commerce clause doesn't authorize this major power grab by the federal government. i think that is positive. he found that the tax and spend clause did. that is a legal question. the policy question, is this good for the american people, the people of virginia, no, it is not. we ought to have more policies that reflect federalism that honors the doctor patient privilege and doesn't break the bank. this was a bureaucratic unfunded mandate on citizens in the state. i don't see any harm in wait the four months and see if we get a new senate and a new president. if you want to repea

with the section of the law that tries to repeal the full faith and credit clause of the united states constitutionwill be held unconstitutional as well but it may have to wait a different case. >> david, does it have to wait for another litigant to make it up through the appeals court level, specifically on that issue in order to get to the supreme court? >> it generally -- it generally would have to. now, the reasoning of the court's opinion would support holding that -- the other section unconstitutional, as well. so sometimes a broad ruling can strike down the underlying principle for sections that aren't before the court but in terms of getting an actual litigated result you would probably need unless the court reached out to take it, you would probably need to have an actual litigant that was affected by the particular section involved. >> yeah, zach, as you read that language in the decision as david says, it does -- if you were just trying to apply that thinking, that court's thinking to the other provision, it would be very hard, it seems to me, for that same court -- >> no, definitely. >>