jackson probably had in mind section three, article three of the united states constitution where treason is defined as loving war against the united states or in giving enemies aid and comfort. lincoln faced a challenge to national authority greater on a scale that washington or jackson, but he looked to them for example as he formulated his response to secession. it is interesting that these southerners provided lincoln with a precedent and inspiration he needed to for fill his sworn duty and defend the constitution against its country's domestic enemies. echoing jackson, he spoke of secession is trying to sugarcoat treason under the guise of states rights. o state can lawfully get out of the union that resolved ordinances to the effect or legally avoid acts of violence is the united states like the firing on fort sumter are insurrectionary or revolutionary. and like washington, lincoln declared ballots are the rightful and peaceful successors to bullets. when bullets have constitution decided, there can be no successful appeal. the doctrine of secession did not exist in a vacuum. the r

and also this means that the supreme court is still protecting the fourth amendment the united states constitution which prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures with the supreme court the is that even if in arrestee has a canister in his pocket a film canister the police can open that up and find drugs in it and the person can be prosecuted for it if the same person who's arrested is found with a camera in his sorry a cell phone in his pocket the police now need to get a search warrant from a judicial officer to be able to search that camera to say that cell phone generally and david how big of a when do you think this is for privacy advocates. well it's certainly a big win in terms of the criminal aspect of. the the issues i think the bigger long term issue is whether private companies can continue to mine people's dot is and what what use is that private companies can put to them so this does address one small problem the warrantless searches. for example you know with the n.s.a. spying situation those are searches that are done with warrants in a secret court so there's still a lot of work

. >> i, do solemnly swear that i will support and defend the constitution of the united states and the constitution of the state of california against all enemies foreign and domestic. that i will bear true faith and allegiance to the constitution of the united states and the constitution of the state of california. i take this obligation freely without any mental conservation or purpose of evasion, and that i will faithfully discharge the duties upon which i'm about to enter, and during such time as i hold the office of a member of the board of examiners and seat of the city and county of san francisco. thank you gentlemen and congratulations. [applause] >> thank you. >> item number 5, directors report, 5a, update on dbi finances. >> good mom r morning, i'm the acting chief financial officer. for our finances we are getting close to the end of the year, we're about 83 percent through the year, we have done all our transfers to the capital projects. the services of other departments, they bill quarterly so we're a little lower than what we'd expect, but i think they'll spend much close

jackson probably had in mind section three, article three of the united states constitution where treason is defined as loving war against the united states or in giving enemies aid and comfort. lincoln faced a challenge to national authority greater on a scale that washington or jackson, but he looked to them for example as he formulated his response to secession. it is interesting that these southerners provided lincoln with a precedent and inspiration he needed to for fill his sworn duty and defend the constitution against its country's domestic enemies. echoing jackson, he spoke of secession is trying to sugarcoat treason under the guise of states rights. no state can lawfully get out of the union that resolved ordinances to the effect or legally avoid acts of violence is the united states like the firing on fort sumter are insurrectionary or revolutionary. and like washington, lincoln declared ballots are the rightful and peaceful successors to bullets. when bullets have constitution decided, there can be no successful appeal. the doctrine of secession did not exist in a vacuum. the

. >> according to the united states constitution, anyone born in the country can automatically claimu.s. citizenship. the chinese agencies' websites make it all look straightforward. seven months into their pregnancies, women pack their bags and head off to california. and while they wait to give birth to their american offspring, they can always spend their time shopping. in the long-run, their plan is to send their children to an american university. an american passport is a guarantee of freedom and social stability. it also confers the right to vote in presidential elections. it is estimated that about 10,000 babies are born in california every year to chinese parents there on tourist visas. the agencies are booming. someone from the agency is always on hand to help the expectant mothers. even in the supermarket. we follow a group at a discreet distance as they head back to a residential complex. hundreds of the apartments here are rented out to pregnant chinese women. many of them beat a hasty retreat at the sight of the cameras. nonetheless, we find a few who are willing to tal

the united states constitution, we had a history book, i came back and i read the second amendment to him. said, it is inn the united states constitution. write. could not read or to fold over the page of the book and then took the book from me. we forgot about it. noticedor so later, we he was not around. we asked his wife, where is mr. joe? she says, he went to get his gun. you said it was all right. [laughter] now we are scared because our fear is -- and this was a continuing fear in the organizing work that people would get hurt or killed because they are doing something that you asked them to do. voter registration or whatever will stop -- or whatever. the worry was that he was going to say, give me my gun back thomas and he would wound up getting shot. he had gone to the mayor's office. andtopped us at gunpoint tried to run us out of town. we were worried that mr. joe was going to get killed. but then we hear the rattle of his old truck and there is mr. joe driving back from downtown. we rush out and say, what happened? i went down there and i told the mayor, i've come to get my

the constitution of the united states. >> (repeated.) and the constitution of the state of california. >> (repeated.) . against all enemies >> (repeated.) >> modern and domestic. >> (repeated.) that i will bear true faith. >> (repeated.) and alliance. >> (repeated.) to the constitution of the united states and the constitution. >> (repeated.) of the state of california. >> (repeated.) >> under god. >> (repeated.) >> under god. >> thank you class you may be seated (clapping) question will now have the badges and the certificates present to the kruts. marshall balancing la (clapping) can i please have everyone hold your applause until wire

rationale of taking a life of another person in the united states, and that is laid out quite clearly. the old rules, particularly the constitutional protections of the united states apply. but if we're in a war with another country and american citizen enlists for the other side they are subject to the same laws in the battlefield and being killed by our forces as people who are citizens of the other country. when you're participating in a conflict, citizenship is not the issue. the issue is if you intend to kill, then the presiden president of the united states has the responsibility to. prevent that. people who are sitting in afghanistan, pakistan, yemen can do things that result in major death and destructn in the united states and elsewhere. we have to be able to hand that will problem. >> professor, the memo does talk about anwar al a ulaqi's rights. it's not okay to kill people who are fighting but not in uniform. it does observe some of the needs set out a matrix for fighting war in this era. what more do you need to get us the rest of the way? >> well, the first thing i would say i think it dismissed the fourth and fifth a

it's the amendment of the united states constitution and section 92 of the penal code and most important to the court, it provides quality representation to all defendants who are innocent until proven guilty. so this year's budget for defense includes rate includes for attorneys and investigators who are appointed as apart of the program. it's a rate increase long overdue. the last increase for this program was seven years ago in 2007 and because of that, the judges of the court unanimously supported this increase because again, the courts interest is to make sure that not only do defendants have representation but it's of the up most quality and this increase will help prevent quality attorneys and investigators from leaving the program. the program has cost savings to the tune of $1.3 million. so the budget proposal that's before you that was included in the mayor's budget has a portion of those savings, $810,000 to go towards the rate increase and the remaining $500,000 is reduced from the program's budget and as mr. rose indicates to you in his report, the program is projected to no

. >> support the constitution of the united states.t but there was always a substantial number of americans that supported the vietnam war. >> my son is a marine! >> it's hard to recapture how intense that period was, how morally conflicting it was, and your relationship with your country was just something we never questioned. >> the pressure on mr. johnson to choose sides has been growing. clinging to a middle line, he tried to give one ear to the war of hawks, one ear to the doves but both ears to neither. >> we halted bombing in the north in hope that the government would single its willingness to talk instead of fight but i regret to tell you no signal came during the 37 days. >> johnson feels alternately outraged he's being attacked in this way when he's doing the best he can. >> until today, they decide to end this aggression and to make an honorable preach. i can assure you we speaking to the united states of america intend to carry on. >> a large committee of responsible lawyers has examined the united states legal position in

but the supreme court did is stand by the principle of the united states constitution that requires those who would take the intellectual property of others to deal with them, to do business with them. cable was subject to copper then a new technology comes along and they were subject to copyright. aereo comes along and tries to build a model that exempts them from dealing with the creators of this content. the supreme court said you cannot do that. >> come in on the decision. it was 6-3. what does that tell you about the future litigation around streaming of content? >> the court was clear in the opinion to limit the holding in this case to these facts. they went out of their way to make it clear that this decision would not necessarily apply to another set technology. or different technology. we will have to wait until the next case. on these facts with these technologies, this is a violation of the copyright act. >> mitch stoltz, is the ruling specific enough to let other technology take the lead? >> it is not specific enough. it uses a lot of weasel words like saying aereo was similar

because he doesn't have, as he said, the united states constitution being flawed.it's also deeply flawed like hey, vote against me 12 times, that's okay, as to whether you will further allow me to draw back america's influence. lou: what would be the president confidence to do this? working with the governments in central america. moving children 1800 miles from their home country to our border, helping them profit. >> the same thing that has led him to other acts that make our country less power all. it is a way to weaken the nation. especially with america and its very nature is whether it's a worse for good or evil in the world. then everything will you do, it will be colored by that. we've seen so many of this president's decisions to be understood in a way. >> it permits him a wide range of rationalizations for every strategy that looks destructive of american interests. >> the question is can they sleep at night, because his agenda is being perceived, as i have told you, that if in 60 or someone can cause as much chaos and reduce our status around the globe t

state. our constitution with all of its brilliance could not reject them. the united states supreme court's most discredited opinion was not overturned by the court. it was overturned by constitutional amendment. iserstanding scott's lawsuit useful in understanding the art of the reconstruction amendment. only point out a few stars in the constellation. the lawsuit sharpened besides. it became a rallying point in lincoln doug was, in the halls of congress, and in newspapers around the nation. secession prompted the civil war. the case lit the fuse. the supreme court decision catalyzed the process of constitutional amendment. president lincoln's emancipation proclamation was the start to ending slavery. but many questioned its legality, and it only applied to states in rebellion, which did not include missouri. amending the constitution was necessary to abolish slavery and race the clout of the dred scott decision. only highlighted the deficiencies, it also highlighted the structures by which to fix it. amendments,able particularly the 13th and 14th, draw on the langua

is unique about the united states constitution is that there are so many different layers. they have their myths about the constitution. even people who studied a little bit have their myths about it. and people who studied a lot have myths about it. think about these russian babushka dolls. this is just an outer cover. it is not the real thing. take it away and then there is a another beautiful one. wait a minute. there is something more. you keep taking more and more layers away to try to get at the roping. that is what i want to try to do today, you peel away some of the layers of mythology surrounding the constitution. i will do about 40 minutes on that. maybe you can help me peel away some more. wanted to talk about the notion that the constitution at the democratic document. if you look at the actual complaints that the people who constitution, they had 13 sovereign nations. as sovereign as the united states and mexico and canada are today. they had complaints about them to listen to some the things they said. the problem was in excess of democracy, a headstrong democr

. >> the first amendment to the united states constitution is clear, congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof. weren't the plaintiffs in this case just exercising religious freedom? >> i really don't think so. it depends on how you define religious freedom. one of the things that is clear in this case is that the burden claimed by the plaintiffs is very attenuated. although they were being required to do was provide contraceptive coverage that might or might not be used down the line by an employee in consultation with a doctor on their own moral or health needs. it is not the direct exercise. it is not about how they worship or anything closely connected to their freedoms of religion. >> how does this expand the rights of for-profit companies? >> we will have to see how that plays out. the majority opinion said that it was leaving those decisions to the future but that it did open the door, so now we know that corporations like these companies in question have religious exercise rights under the religious freedom restorat

but what we expect from the united states is to defend the freedom of speech as one of its basic principles embedded in the united states constitutionhave you spoken to the u.s. government, i mean, the timing of this trip, the day before the journalists were sentenced. now the u.s. government has, and john kerry has, conveyed they are upset with these verdicts, but the actions are different. what have they said? >> he had strong comments afterwards. i think he gave a press conference the second day and we appreciate his comments. we speak to officials from different governments. we are seeking their support as well. >> how are you covering egypt now? al jazeera english, al jazeera local al the jazeera -- none of these can operate? >> in the current atmosphere of ways toere are several cover and technology will help us in covering egypt. we did not stop covering al jazeera egypt. what we are lacking are our own correspondents. we have correspondents from other networks helping us. >> we just got word from al jazeera that there was a bomb that went off to the presidential palace in cairo, i believe tito police officers were killed and

why would the united states of america put its prison facility for foreign prisoners on the island of cuba? we did it so we could avoid the impact of the united states constitutions. it was a shyster's ploy. it was an awful idea -- >> not very start. >> why not a military base in the united states? why not a maximum security federal prison? and after 1 years, they've -- 12 years, it seems to me the taliban and the haqqani gangsters -- who i know very well -- have done quite effectively in terms of pursuit of their war without these five and the others in guantanamo. these people have all been incarcerated since before the major push in afghanistan -- >> so you're saying what's happened with bergdahl does not change your mind one bit about releasing prisoners from gitmo? that doesn't change your mind? >> what do you know that a i don't know? >> that's just the problem, we don't know enough yet. >> we know he's an american g.i., and he's got to be brought home. >> shouldn't we stop releasing prisoners until we find out more? >> you know, one of the things as i've been in combat so often with these guys in every branch of the service, one of the things they take gr

the united states constitution and any accountability did not travel with it. >> you have a child whoseamily cannot seek redress within the civil justice system for that conduct and it occurred only because of the vacuum which is our border. it's like walking out into the wild wild west and you're standing there at high noon and whatever you do is not reviewed anymore. real reporting that brings you the world. giving you a real global perspective like no other can. real reporting from around the world. this is what we do. al jazeera america. >> al jazeera america's presents the system with joe burlinger observing a crime >> a shocking number of these eyewitnesses get it wrong >> how much would you remember? >> dark complected... medium height... you described most of the majority of the men in america >> sometimes witnesses get it right >> when you have an eyewitness to say i saw him do it, that is the best evidence. >> and sometimes sometimes they don't >> no one is listening to us... george is innocent... >> the system with joe burlinger only on al jazeera america >>cross-border killi

this is all about the united states constitution. article one says the president of the united states -- i'm sorry, the congress is the legislative body. all legislatiive powers herein granted to the united states. so it's not about our wanting to stop him from doing his job. it's our wanting to do the job that the constitution prescribes and not to take powers resting in the congress and through not enforcing laws or changing laws that have been passed taking power from the legislative branch. it's very important, and this should be bipartisan people standing up to protect the balance of power, the check against a too-powerful executive branch. it's been done in the past. it needs to be done again. >> let me put up a few of the unilateral actions president obama has taken in recent years. take a look at this list. february 2011, ordered the justice department to stop defending the defense of marriage act. june 2012, declared deportation of some -- deferred, rather. february 2014, raise the minimum wage for federal contractors. over

administration steps up and does what the federal government is supposed to do under the united states constitutionwhat if it doesn't want to and wants to make it seem like you're anti-immigrant, not just antiillegal immigrant, they're trying to put you and republicans in a corner saying you're callous and heartless. >> now the obama administration has been exposed for per suing that narrative -- pursuing that narrative because now americans across the board are seeing how the lack of enforcement on the border has turned into a complete disaster, and everyone is against the failure to secure our border the way the president failed to do so here. however, neil, texas is not waiting around for the obama administration because we are now sending department of public safety officers to the border in a large operation, to try to do a better job of securing our state border. >> the government won't do it on the federal level, you guys are trying to do it on the state. thank you very much. see what happens. >> thank you, neil. >>> called for jury duty? watch what you put up on facebook. ♪ don't miss a ste

statement where he determines the notice requirement was a violation of article 2 of the united states constitutionsn't get to do that. that's number one. number two, administration's position, as sean played, the position of the administration was the notification and certification on requirements had to take place because that is what the law is and that the president wants to make this kind of exception to it, he doesn't get to do it that way. sean, h this is what i don't understand. you know they were working on this for more than 30 days. it didn't have to be public. >> you know how we know. we got some details. >> right. >> the taliban at one point in the negotiations, actually walked away from the table because they had specifically requested. >> right. >> these five people. and eventually got it. >> right. >> was this a negotiation, leslie, or do you spin this, as well, saying no, this was not a negotiation? >> well, first of all, sean, i know a lot of people will hate me for this but i feel if we get an american home, whether one or numerous -- >> i didn't ask you -- >> favor -- >> you're

. >> a ploy to evade the united states constitution. >> he's not a citizen.ombatant. >> he'll come here, he'll be convicted, he'll be put six stories underground in colorado. >> also trying to extract intelligence from him. >> from the mediterranean. >> and, you know, in fact, when it comes to iraq, that is a direct threat to americans' national security. i don't know if you saw, but the leader of isis in iraq when he was released in 2009, said i'll see you in new york. >> if you're obama and you lose geraldo -- >> it's not even geraldo. when you have the rats jumping off the ship like chuck todd. he was like the original obama girl, this girl chuck todd. you know you're in big trouble. >> president obama comes off as disengaged, passionless, above it all. don't discount the impact of that workout tape in the hotel where he made richard simmons look like dwayne johnson. >> that was pretty pathetic. >> wait. >> i was worried that he was going to try to overcompensate for the perception of weakness by recklessly injecting our military into this iraq mess the wa

there is something called united states constitution people actually earn title to a defense >> a technicalitye police messed up in their investigation. >> time? that is a technicality. >> time served happens all the time. >> two months for raping a 12-year-old girl? >> she took it. >> sean you're full of it you need to grow up. you need to grow up. >> is that the best you've got? . >> i don't have anymore. >> you're too hard to debate. >> thank you. >> you always win. >> check mate. >> that is all the time we have left this evening. we'll see you back here tomorrow night. fun. bill o'reilly is up nextment good night. >> >>> the o'reilly factor is on. tonight: >> regardless of how long it takes, we will will find you. and i want to make sure that everybody around the world hears that message very clearly. >> u.s. special forces grab one of the alleged ringleaders of the benghazi killings in libya. he is now on his way to america. meantime, the al qaeda atrocities mount in iraq. what will president obama do? charles krauthammer, john stossel, and i will analyze. >> talk about the border patrol