proximity to one another, we also have city governments, state governments in the united states, we have a federal government in the united states and it's only natural that another layer of government that deals with issues of loss. but over the course of the next hundred years from the lives of our children and grandchildren, we will see progress with it. the big question is whether the balance between the power of those public entities and big private enterprises that are the size of most of the biggest countries in the world. it also remains unbalanced. right now, our future is being determined in financial markets that are regulated by anybody. where the risk of a blow is a risk to each of us and those factors have been very successful in shrugging off and keeping away kind of regulation that could mitigate that risk. and the point is we need to pay

the united states federal government -- unless europe is dollarized, unless they do not have dollars to spend purchasing the net exports of those who have surpluses, then they will stop having surplus. this is the surplus recycling mechanism. thus, we have the 20 years of the golden age. the 1950's and the 1960's. a period of immense stability very low inflation. universal growth. we had other problems. the lease from the macroeconomic point of view, it was a golden age. why did it end? because the global surplus of recycling mechanism could no longer be sustained. why? because the united states stopped having a surplus by the end of the 1960's. how can you recycle surplus if you cannot have it. enter a young turk in 1971. well, paul volcker -- that name may ring a bell. in 1971, paul volcker was an unknown working for another american. henry kissinger, who you may have heard of. before he became secretary of state. he was still national security advisor. volcker's paper, which are when i read a few years ago, i thought it was the most remarkable document ever to emerge from washingt

that's why security authorities in the united states, federal government uses blackberry. >> that's right other thing too is we've got the baby boomers really retiring in mass, and they want that big screen. they don't like to have that little problematic typing situation with the iphones. that's why they like the blackberry keys. >> yes. liz: do you see apple adapting to that and having a bigger screen with bigger key pads? >> yes, i do. i think ultimately it is all about user choice and people are going to want an extra large iphone, and if they don't, samsung is going to do it. what i do give rimm credit for, they're coming out two types of devices for blackberry 10. one will have a large screen with new predictive key board so if you are typing and the word shows up, you can swipe up from the key board and it will show up. they are actually going after baby boomers in that sense, but will make traditionalists happy with the standard key board. david: the most popular gift you had this christmas season is a pogo stick that you bought for your kids? >> yes. but the nintendo ds also did

live in geographic proximity to one another, we also have city governments, state governments in the united states, we have a federal government in the united states and it's only natural that another layer of government that deals with issues of loss. but over the course of the next hundred years from the lives of our children and grandchildren, we will see progress with it. the big question is whether the balance between the power of those public entities and big private enterprises that are the size of most of the biggest countries in the world. it also remains unbalanced. right now, our future is being determined in financial markets that are regulated by anybody. where the risk of a blow is a risk to each of us and those factors have been very successful in shrugging off and keeping away kind of regulation that could mitigate that risk. and the point is we need to pay attention there and we need to balance their, particularly in the united states, we are seriously out of markets." and that's in a few minutes. but in the meantime, we want to oduc >> we want to introduce you to lila quintero weaver. she is the au

the united states federal government -- unless europe is dollarized, unless they do not have dollars to spend purchasing -- unless those who do not have dollars are given dollars to spend purchasing, the net exports of those who have surpluses, then they will stop having surplus. this is the surplus recycling mechanism. thus, we have the 20 years of the golden age. the 1950's and the 1960's. a period of immense stability very low inflation. very low unemployment. universal growth. we had other problems. the lease from the macroeconomic point of view, it was a golden age. why did it end? because the global surplus of recycling mechanism could no longer be sustained. why? because the united states stopped having a surplus by the end of the 1960's. how can you recycle surplus if you cannot have it. -- if you do not have it? enter a young turk in 1971. actually, he was the american, but you know what i mean. well, paul volcker -- that name may ring a bell. in 1971, paul volcker was an unknown working for another american. henry kissinger, who you may have heard of. before he became secre

her suit against the united states isn't asking to be legally married. it's to have the federal government recognize her legal marriage. >> right. >> vis-a-vis the internal revenue service. because when her partner of 42 years died, she owed $363,000 in federal estate taxes that she would not have to pay if her spouse had been a man. >> and that's a great point because she was legally married in canada, lived in a state that marriage equality is legal. so we're not asking in this case for them to affirm the marriage. it's just for them to affirm where she is legally married that the federal government has to respect that, rich around. >> yes, that's true. but i think that the big picture we want to emphasize today is that we are at the beginning of the end of this struggle perhaps.

predatory and discriminatory lending practices against minorities here in the united states but while the federal government might be reluctant to punish mega banks like this three counties in georgia are fighting back actually suing the banks for allegedly costing them hundreds of millions of dollars in expenses and damages to their tax bases by aggressively signing minority borrowers to housing loans that the bank knew the people wouldn't be able to pay back it's a case that could set a precedent for how banks that engage in predatory lending will be dealt with in the future so to talk more about h.s.b.c.'s not so secret scheming i'm joined now by carl kasell kyle harrington founder and managing partner of harrington capital management hi there kyle so let's start off by talking about these counties in atlanta what are they suing for and what can really come out of all of this. well i think the following right any predatory or one tone approach to lending practices associated with individuals you know has to it cannot go without punishment and i know that we're all responsible for reading our documents an

keep tabs on thing but of course there's no funding these are nonprofit efforts the federal government the united states has really been derelict in its duty to protect our health camps thank you so much for being with us tonight thank you to keep up the great work of beyond where. now for an update on a story we brought you last week online movies streaming giant netflix is one stop a step closer to being able to sell your viewing history to whoever they want. on thursday of last week the senate followed the house's lead in passing an amendment to the video privacy protection act of one nine hundred eighty eight a law that originally banned publicly releasing consumers video rental histories in them it now allows netflix to share their consumers if you are in history with others on social media the president is expected to sign this amendment into law meaning you may want to think twice about what sort of subversive documentaries or soft core flicks you decide to watch on netflix this law change will be a huge benefit for online advertisers who can target users based on the movies they watch but more i

the united states federal government -- unless europe is dollar rise, unless they do not have dollars to spend purchasing the net exports of those who have surpluses, then they will stop having surplus. this is the surplus recycling mechanism. thus, we have the 20 years of the golden age. a period of immense stability very low inflation. universal growth. we had other problems. the lease from the macroeconomic point of view, it was a golden age. why is that? because the global surplus of recycling mechanism was sustained. why? because the united states stopped having a surplus by the end of the 1960's. how can you recycle surplus if you cannot have it. well, paul volcker -- been named may ring a bell. in 1971, paul volcker was an unknown working for another american. henry kissinger, who you may have heard of. before he became secretary of state. volcker's paper, which are when i read a few years ago, i thought it was the most remarkable document ever to emerge from washington in the last few years. looking at the emerging economies of the world -- primarily germany and japan at the t

united states? >> the origin of the united states is a bottom up system. the origin. unfortunately, the share of federal governmentrted having large corporations dominating the scene, and saw mutation. there are two sectors in the united states today that resemble the model, all right. >> the anti-fragile. >> the anti-fragile model. one is the restaurant business, the other is silicon valley. silicon valley thrives on disorder. they try, experiment, have a lot of failures, they use failure as fuel. same with the restaurant business. the united states is moving away from a good system, anti-fragile system. let me give example of what it is overall. the idea that the air transportation, every plane crash leads to an improvement in safety. so you know when there's a probability, whatever probability of a crash you have the next one will be lower. the banking system today in united states, if one crashes, you know the probability of the next crashing is higher. we're not living in a healthy system. >> let's take this idea to individuals. in an interesting part of the book you say individual careers can be fragile and

important to note in both of these cases, the united states government has refused to defend doma, the federal law before this court. when we filed the case in california, as one has to do, we sued the governor at the time, arnold schwarzenegger and our attorney general at the time, jerry brown, the current governor. both responded by refusing to defend the case and ultimately joined our signed the case and said it was fundamentally and unconstitutional law and they weren't going to defend it. the judge in our case. chief judge von walker, who wrote that historic ruling in this case allowed the intervening defendants, proponents of prop 8 to enter vene and defend the case. in the doma case, the small group on capitol hill at the house have come together and defending it because the federal government won't. at the end of the day, this is unconstitutional and everyone knows it. >> a day of history. it can be a major moment. look what tom goldstein, a very respected blog wrote last week. i have never before seen cases i believed would be discussed 200 years from now. bush v gore. the government'

and you can tell what part of governance they have done this to with one simple test. find any other federal agency in the united states government when on the day that the president of the united states at a live nationally televised on all the networks news conference, when the president talks about a personnel matter at that specific agency and names the agency explicitly, the president says it himself, on tv that day, find me any other federal agency where on that day you call that agency for comment on that day before the close of business at 5:00 p.m., and they tell you, actually, there is nobody here to -- there is nobody here to help you there is nobody around to answer any of your questions. we might want to try transfers you to one of our west coast offices because the time difference, it's earlier there maybe there is somebody still -- i understand it's the holiday season, sort of. but the atf, the bureau of alcohol, tobacco, firearms and explosives is so underresourced and understaffed, it is so atrophied from being politically undermined for so many years that today when the president of the united states

united states. so they have their own rules, own nation. the federal governmentwhat's impeding the investigation of larry stackhouse, jr. >> and this particular case, if they do not have the resources available, then they can request the assistance of the fbi or of the justice department to go on to the reservation to do the search. but let us not be confused also that people that are involved are part -- are part of the problem which is law enforcement. and in this particular case, what mr. stackhouse's son. >> you say there's corruption inside the police force. what is going on? >> it was a police officer's son who was accompanying mr. stackhouse's son at that basketball game. >> how does that make you feel? >> it breaks our heart. it took us two weeks just to report him missing. they did not want to hear about my son's case. they felt that, you know -- one of the friends stayed over at a girlfriend's house. didn't want to get involved in the case. i pleaded with them to reach out and help us find out what happened to our child. >> i'm sick and tired of the min

united states. it's very popular to the anti-federal government. washington d.c. where i live is a swamp, but we are actually generally as a people much happier with our more local government. states in city government is considered to be in high regard. in china it's the opposite. so when you have stories like this, clearly been so ridiculously corrupt, he challenges the narrative of what happens when people realize the whole system is rotten to the core. and i swear that story and anyone who linked to that story was quickly censored this week. >> that was my question. how widely has the story been disseminated? >> don't underestimate the information if people want to have it. this is a sliver of china because only so much is actually online, so much as the ability to navigate the censorship controls. yes, it's being read. >> when people make the claim authoritarian governments can create economic development, they tend to say china and then they say singapore singapore in the same breath. is very democratic underground and singapore? >> areas. but if china has a

united states never had a government that big until the new deal. fin day had to build this enormous central state. think of that. they passed taxes within a year. and agents of the federal government literally taking food out of people's barnes. the only way to feed the army. that is fascinating that the slaveholders go to war to protect slavery than they think the new government will protect their slaves during war but it turns out they needs to use them to win the war. added it is an enormous tussle the also wrote a clause in the constitution that congress could never abolish slavery. they had a problem of sovereignty. they could not reach the slaves. they cannot reach them without the permission of the owner. they had codified the status of slaves as private property. can you imagine they were mortgaged up to the eyeballs. they all must talk about the angle, the powerful ally and to say slays don't like to do the work for personal reasons but because they don't want to do any during the union. the most interesting is watching the psychology of the slaveholders. where the desires or objectives with a master's of business from the minute lincoln is elected they notice

federal spending more transparent. they have been -- the co mpttroller of the united states, the tech industry, and 23 open government groups saying we need legislation because federal spending data is not as trends. as it needs to be. information and should be published is not being published. why has the white house sent a deputy treasury secretary to capitol hill to testify against the legislation? the answer lies in the fact that making valuable data published in standardized always requires engagement with a substantive policy area. the opposition to be data at in the white house is being driven by the office of federal management. it is not that office's job to make sure things are published. i do not believe the white house leaders' working on open government data oppose what we -- white house leaders working on open government data oppose what the legislation does. those whose job is to do the work of three day -- that is the disagreements that have to play out. there is the same dynamic in other areas where it wants to see data published. >> building awful that a little bits, we are -- building off of that a little

united states supreme court as well. >> absolutely. what you started out with, this idea of states rights versus federal government prerogatives is a realt are you going to get necessarily one voice. >> see what happens on this one. thanks very much. >>> the house speaker, john boehner, says the ball is in president obama's court to prevent the so-called fiscal cliff. but is he hinting at new room for compromise on hiking taxes on america's richest? [ male announcer ] this december, remember -- ♪ you can stay in and like something... ♪ [ car alarm deactivates ] ♪ ...or you can get out there with your family and actually like something. ♪ the lexus december to remember sales event is on, offering some of our best values of the year. this is the pursuit of perfection. have led to an increase intands clinical depression. drug and alcohol abuse is up. and those dealing with grief don't have access to the professional help they need. when you see these issues, do you want to walk away or step up? with a degree in the field of counseling or psychology from capella university, you'll have the knowledge to make a difference in the lives of othe

so now it is really up to the federal government to kind of step in and say, okay, this is where we have to come together on our thinking. >> it is up to the united statesgovernment. the federal government, the last word they have is the defense of marriage act. and what makes this so significant is that the supreme court has not really engaged with the issue of -- of gay rights since 2003. nine years. that's a long time. the country has changed dramatically in those nine years. there is a new gallup poll out that says 53% of americans support same sex marriage. our cnn exit poll said 49% of people support same sex marriage. in the '90s, that number was in the 20s. the country is changing very quickly. that doesn't necessarily mean the supreme court will follow along. look for a lot of attention between now and when the case is argued, probably in march, on anthony kennedy because he has been the swing vote in all of the gay rights cases and he is the author of the two most important gay rights decisions of the supreme court. and even though kennedy is usually with the conservatives, he has always been with the liberals on gay rights. so he will be very

saying that mexico cannot conduct effective negotiations with the united states when the foreign policy decisions of the federal governmentsermined by the individual policies of individual states. how do you respond to that? >> well, the federal government does legitimately have a monopoly on foreign relations and we haven't interfered with that, we haven't opened up embassies or consulates we're simply within the wonders in the states of arizona. they're disagreeing-- a foreign country disagrees with our laws on our state for illegal activity that therefore that becomes a matter of international relakeses and a federal court can then invalidate an otherwise invalid state law because a foreign country disagrees with it and if they think we're interfering with foreign relations, that's a very dangerous argument and i think it's important that the courts strike down that kind of argument. >> kelly: couldn't you also go to the argument, well, if you feel that our law is so tough and you have something else this minor aspect of sb-1070 which is what it's known as in arizona, then why do you continue to send your drug dealers o

he asked for president of the united states for help and he made an offer they couldn't refuse. >> he offered to donate the land to the federal government and this is the first time an individual had done that. >> the president acted quickly setting aside the land. he strongly urged that the new monument be named kent woods. >> he said that was not right and instead let's name this beautiful grove of coast red woods after john muir. >> of course, the president had long standing ties with john muir and agreed. so by a gift of william kent to the united states became a monument. and it was up to the united states to keep it from crumbling under the wait. cab sites and dogs and picnicking were no longer welcome. the trampled part of the floor was part of the vertigo affect. >> you watch kim novack wondering through a forest that is only red woods. there is no plants or ferns growing and no habitat for the animals. >> in a letter to william kent written more than 90-years ago, john muir expressed gratitude. this is the most godly behavior i have heard of since my forrest trampling began. >> it made a deep impression on him what was importan

government refused to recognize her marriage to her same sex partner. and the question there is whether the federal defensive marriage act which blocks the united states governmentrom recognizing marriages of same sex couples will stand, will it continue or will marriage discrimination by the government federal government come to an end? the other case involves a california law, which bans marriage recognition for same sex couples. it took away marriage rights from same sex couples and the question in that case is what will happen in california and perhaps what will happen in other states throughout the united states. >> what does it mean if that ban is upheld? >> if it's upheld in california same sex couples will not be getting married in california and it means that there's a question then about what will happen with marriage rights for same sex couples in the rest of the country. of course any state can allow same sex couples to marry and many do but the question is whether the law will require that. >> if the law makes it into the supreme court, which you say there's actually some question of whether this is actually going to follow through, what will the ou

government. we were talking about this, the federal tort claims act. if the united statesknown and was reckless with the lives of americans they might beheld accountable. but i will tell you what, greg, when is the last time you saw something in washington work? >> that's a contridiction in terms. that's an oxymoron. you can catch justice with judge janeen here on the fox newschannel. check it out, heather? >>> coming up, in the debate over the fiscal cliff deal, which side is winning the public opinion war? who most americans say gets the message. ♪ ♪ ♪ [ male announcer ] while you're getting ready for the holidays, we're getting ready for you. tis the season. for food, for family, and now, something extra -- for you. cliff approaching who is winning the messaging war? >> according to a new rase -- rasmusson poll, americans will insist on spending cuts and 40% think president obama will insist on only tax increases. let's bring in scott rasmusson from rasmusson reports. take us behind the numbers. what do you see here? >> the reason they are losing the war is they think i

if the federal government wants to help the schools, they should give the funding. they need to fund -- every school in the united states should be funded with money from the federal government so there can be a full-time police officer on staff in every building in every school of the united states. host: on twitter -- president obama talk about meaningful action last night. on the washington post, they're asking what does that mean? the wall street journal has an opinion piece as well responded to the shootings in connecticut. herman is an independent caller in louisiana. what's your opinion? caller: when you have a gun free zones, you advertise to these mentally ill people that there's nobody there that is armed and nobody can stop them. an intruder with a gun. host: what would you do? caller: i would have the teachers have concealed weapons carry permits and to have the proper training or to have the federal government supplies the money to have a trained police officer at the school's. 20,000 gun laws on the books already and that did not stop anything with the school killings. it is a tragic thing. it is a terribl

. >> the constitution of the united states says all rights are reserved for the states except for those given to the government. >> but there are many federalaws. >> there are. >> the argument now in the supreme court will be should it be a federal issue, and i don't see how you can be a free and equal america unless this is a federal decision that says all rights are equal. >> do you respect the religious beliefs? and if they reflect those religious beliefs in the laws that are passed by their states -- >> i do respect those beliefs. >> that's the will of the people. >> but there are many religions in many different states. >> yes, there are. >> would you expect the original right of the founding father to allow slavery? >> no. >> would you allow slavery in some states and not others? no, you wouldn't. >> it runs straight into what you're asking which is the states are the place where domestic law, where family law is determined state by state. the supreme court may say that's no longer valid. i would say this to you. connecticut, same-sex marriage is legal in connecticut. somebody asked me recently, how's it changed thing? and you know, i

it's important to note in both of these cases, the united states government has refused to defend doma, the federalaw that's now before this court, and when we filed the case right here in california, as one has to do, we sued the governor at the time which was arnold schwarzenegger and our attorney general at the time which was jerry brown, the current governor. both responded by refusing to defend the case and ultimately joined our side in the case and said it was fundamentally an unconstitutional law and they weren't going to defend it. so the judge in our case, chief judge vaughn walker, who wrote that historic ruling in this case, allowed the intervening defendants, the proponents of prop 8, to intervene and to defend the case. on the doma case the small group of folks on capitol hill out of the house have come together and are defending it because the federal government won't. at the end of the day this is unconstitutional, and everyone knows it. >> it's a day in history here. this could be a major moment in the court's history. look at what tom goldstein of scotus blogged last week. quote, i

biggest tech company in the united states is finally producing some computers in the united states. we talk to apple computers coming up next. >>> and the federal governmentsay lohan. find out why. [ male announcer ] when a major hospital wanted to provide better employee benefits while balancing the company's bottom line, their very first word was... [ to the tune of "lullaby and good night" ] ♪ af-lac ♪ aflac [ male announcer ] find out more at... [ duck ] aflac! [ male announcer ] ...forbusiness.com. [ yawning sound ] [ male announcer ] ...forbusiness.com. try running four.ning a restaurant is hard, fortunately we've got ink. it gives us 5x the rewards on our internet, phone charges and cable, plus at office supply stores. rewards we put right back into our business. this is the only thing we've ever wanted to do and ink helps us do it. make your mark with ink from chase. since ameriprise financial was founded back in 1894, they've been committed to putting clients first. helping generations through tough times. good times. never taking a bailout. there when you need them. helping millions of americans over the centuries. the strength of a global finan

government from negotiating with the united states because they can't say the u.s. government is speaking with one voice because arizona has a different law with this regard, even though it's similar to the federal statute. number 3, it adversely affects mexicans in the united states because it treats them differently in arizona. people wouldn't want to deal with mexican residents or mexican americans. >> neil: illegal. illegal mexicans in the united states. mexico is basically saying they're illegal, braking the law, but you better be able to keep them because we don't want them back? is that what they're saying? >> they're saying it adversely affects legal immigrants because people in arizona will treat those who might be illegal here, those who look latino or mexican, differently. but if you read the law, it's hard to see that. the only way you vital the law is if you already committed another crime and if you noli harbor an illegal immigrant. the real question is why is mexico involving itself in a court case? whether you agree or not, i'm someone who favors comprehensive immigration reform, some call me soft on immigration. but mexico has their own problems. corruption down there. you would

the flag of the united states at half staff at white house and all public buildings and grounds at all military posts and naval stations and on all naval vessels of the federal government and the district of columbia and throughout the united states and the territories and possessions until sunset december 18th, 2012. again, the flag here at the white house will be flown at half staff and the other flags here throughout the capital. president obama making it clear that the federal government stands with connecticut as it endures this tragedy. and tries to cope with this tragedy. the president was alerted about this situation at 10:30 this morning by the national security adviser. he's watching the developments unfold. he's been updated on the situation throughout the day and also been in contact with the folks in connecticut calling the governor there a little bit earlier on this afternoon. but his press secretary jay carney making the point that the president is watching this tragedy unfold, not just as the commander in chief, as the president of this country, but also as a father who has two daughters. >> kristen, do we know, are there plans for the president to visi

states were recruiting industries. they were passing right-to-work laws. they were receiving lots of funding from the federal government to build military installations at a time when the united states was involved in the cold war against the soviet union. so states like mississippi, states like georgia and texas and florida and southern california, arizona, north carolina are all being transformed in the post-world war ii period by this historic shift in population and political influence. just think about it. really does three from 1964 to two dozen eight could be thought of as kind of the carried of sun belt dominance in american presidential history. if you think about every president elected from 1964-2008 comes from a state of the sun belt. lyndon johnson from texas, richard nixon from california, gerald ford was never elected. he was not even elected vice president. he was a michigan. jimmy carter from georgia. ronald reagan from california. first george bush, texas by a connecticut. bill clinton from arkansas, and the second bush from texas. so 2008 is in some ways a watershed election. it is this 40 year period of sun belt dominance. and there were issues that are cr

that resides in oklahoma, the quapaw, to appear before the united states federal court of claims to plead for damages against the federal government for mismanagement of tribal funds. the court would issue a report either favorable or unfavorable to the tribe. if favorable, the natural resources committee would be authorized to move separate legislation to affect the court's decision. in 2002 the tribe filed a lawsuit for an accounting in federal district court of the u.s. government's mismanagement of tribal and tribal member trust assets. in november, 2004, the tribe and the u.s. government agreed that the tribe and third-party contractors would conduct an accounting of the u.s. government's actions and inactions related to the trust assets. this was to facilitate a mediated solution to this lawsuit's claims. in exchange for this mediated route, the tribe would dismiss the lawsuit. after five years of accounting and relating analysis, the quapaw analysis was completed and shared with the u.s. government. this set the stage for mediation. that analysis confirmed that the government's mismanagement of the quapaw's trust constitute

evolving issue, contradiction between states rights and the federal government with president obama at the helm. >> john avalon, always great to see you. >>> the unitedry prepares to potentially shoot down a rocket that north korea plans to launch any day now. >>> plus -- she was the victim of a prank call to the hospital caring for the duchess of cambridge. now that nurse has been found dead. diarrhea, gas, bloating? yeah. one phillips' colon health probiotic cap each day helps defend against these digestive issues with three strains of good bacteria. approved! [ female announcer ] live the regular life. phillips'. trust duracell to power their donated toys? duralock power preserve. it locks in power for up to 10 years in storage. guaranteed. duracell with duralock. trusted everywhere. yeah we both relieve coughs, sneezing, aches, fevers. and i relieve nasal congestion. overachiever. [ female announcer ] tylenol® cold multi-symptom nighttime relieves nasal congestion. nyquil® cold and flu doesn't. [ male announcer ] with a select terrain dial that adjusts the jeep grand cherokee's performance for specific weather and road conditions... ♪ ...even hea

fundamental contradiction between states rights and the federal government with president obama at the helm. >> john avlon, always great to see you. >>> the unitedes to potentially shoot down a rocket that north korea plans to launch any day now. >>> plus -- she was the victim of a prank call to the hospital caring for the duchess of cambridge. now that nurse has been found dead. you get access to nurses who can help with your questions. and your loved one can get exelon patch free for 30 days. if the doctor feels it's right for them. it cannot change how the disease progresses. hospitalization and rarely death have been reported in patients who wore more than one patch at a time. the most common side effects of exelon patch are nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea. the likelihood and severity of these side effects may increase as the dose increases. patients may experience loss of appetite or weight. patients who weigh less than 110 pounds may experience more side effects. people at risk for stomach ulcers who take certain other medicines should talk to their doctor because serious stomach problems such as bleeding may worsen. patients may experience

all of the oil in the united states does not belong to the federal government. oil offshore generally falls under the federal domain. in the state of alaska, we find a lot of energy resources on federal land. the vast bulk of energy resources in the united states are privately owned, developed by individual companies. if we think about those sorts of markets work and there are a lot of buyers and a lot of sellers. the energy markets in the u.s. are fairly reliable from that standpoint. guest: when you are considering a policy, and would argue that policymakers deal with trade- offs all the time. sometimes there is an economic focus, sometimes there is an environmental focus. there are certain areas that we probably will not develop even though they may be rich in resources potential. there are other areas where the population density may preclude them from being developed, and there are still other areas where there is huge resources that we will get access to. the marcellus clay, which goes for southwest new york down to kentucky, is huge. these resources are la

but states and the federal government, there should be a series of pretty strong policies across the unitedn, either states or local governments can enhance, if he want to, but should never be able to low-ball. the u.s. conference of mayors we advocated three major things. one, there should be an assault weapons' ban across united states. no reason for a civilian to ever have an assault rifle, machine gun, multiclips, and so the second part is the large magazines. >> machine guns are banned. >> fully automatic weapons. >> right. if you're putting out hundreds of rounds, you know, a minute, i heap, i'm not going to get into a debate about semiautomatic or automatic, it's a lot. right? large magazines and the clips, 30, 50, you know, 100 rounds, i mean, that's crazy, too. that's the second. >> the shooter aurora had 100-round drums. >> again, why does in the civilian need that? third, we must fix and we can, this is just technology, on the background identification system and closing the gun show loophole. four, as has been talked about and has to be a part of any package, that we really deal

federal government. most of the plaintiffs were either citizens or lawful residents of the united states when they said armed immigration and customs and mores and agents into their homes without warrants nor their consent. some agents of the to the round people up from their bedrooms and issued threats and intimidation in a bid to address those living in the u.s. without documentation. one permanent resident said it agent demanded to know where the nonexistent "illegals" or hiding in your home and pointed a gun at her 9-year-old boy's chest. the plaintiffs were awarded a total of $295,000. the pattern of raids apparently emerged from a policy implemented in 2006 called operation return to sender. the teams of agents were ordered to increase their arrest >> -- quotas. the obama administration later remove the quotas. a tennessee county linked to the discretionary treatment of teenaged african-american suspects has signed a landmark agreement to reform its practices. the justice department says it has reached a deal with local officials to overhaul juvenile justice in shelby county. a report earlier this year