a law and said, all of the commitments iran has, we're not going to honor them until the united states leaves iraq. stops selling arms to saudi arabia. that would be a clear violation of the deal, that is what is being prepared in the senate right now, to complaining the terms of the deal. this will cause the deal to collapse, even though it's not that type of an immediate effort to collapse the deal. and that's tremendously dangerous, no other country in the security council or the cntries that are part of his deal are in agreement with this. >> you mentioned north korea earlier in this conversation. how do you read what the president has said of le about north korea. >> again, i think there's a problem there, which is that i think trump believes can bluff his way to a solution here. that's just simply not the way this thing works. there's a certain parallel to what was going on with iran, in which i believe the united states adopted unrealistic positions early on, and then had to walk them back. that is a problem, they ended up in some ways costing the u.s. in a better solution. precisely becaus

discussions within nato circles that turkey should leave nato turkey is leaving iraq and turkey is having trouble feed united states of america all these discussions creating now a new sense of enmity towards nato i will say is something real in public discussion but to leave the nato is a very very big decision and i do not expect to see if turkey does it then and tire nato and the turkish security it has to be revised once again then turkey would be a non nato member and there. will be a lot of new difficulties challenges rich turkey will face by the way there is no mechanism for. sound turkey out of the alliance except that turkey say ok i want to leave this military pact i do not expect that the parliament. and say ok make sure it's finished for us when it is like you say just another blip in taking nato relations we can't ignore the facts that relations between the two have been going downhill for quite some time and sooner or later are we going to see the last straw. i think it is time for a discussion the moment in the world there is not another alliance based on what interests system that the nations are co

leaves the united states. charles: i base my investment theory on the basis of prosperity. border crossing are down significantly. isis is on the run. they have a tiny corner of iraqeft. you see the respect president trump is getting around the world. the red carpet fleement china, for instance. >> there have been a lot of foreign policy successes. the president mentioned isis. he put isis in crisis. the caliphate is coming apart. it's crumbling. we have had a significant decrease in terrorist attacks in the united states. we have had five terrible plots this year. but the previous year the was 13, the year before that it was 17. that's when isis really kicked off. we are safer here at home than i think we were previously. he put north korea on notice. he put iran on notice on the nuclear deal. even though people are talking about russia. he has done a lot on the security side to reinforce security. i was in latvia and ukraine. they are comfortable and the happy with what the president is doing. charles: it reflects in global stock markets, some of which are out performing america. building the wall, further immigration reform and dumping nafta. how critical is it

perspectives they are saying that acid is playing nice in iraq and they're also not making mention of acid leaving syria leaving office so if the united states has agreed to all of this then it's further indication of what we already suspect that donald trump is swung round pretty much behind the russian view of how things should play out in syria but i have to say where is the united states version of this document if this is a joint statement why has it just comes so far from the kremlin something here is a little bit off the sort of pattern of events over the last couple of days suggest that the united states has pulled back at the last minute that they were planning to have a proper sit down meeting trump and putin in vietnam but the united states washington didn't want that to happen it said tillerson said on on thursday that they would only sit down and have a chat with each other. a proper proper bilateral chat if they had something substantive to talk about and agree on what if this isn't some things of stance of to talk about an agreement then what is america for whatever reason seems have got cold feet and we have to wait and see w