basically, he gave illegal persons, established by the laws of the united states legal status to participate as american citizens in virtually every matter of importance. it is pretty exceptional. former secretary clinton says i will induce comprehensive immigration reform with a path to citizenship to those within my first 100 days. in other words, she would give legal status, citizenship to everybody that came to the country illegally. it is just a very damaging thinm and has a remarkableic consequences and impacts on the legal system and it also incentivizes more people to come to america. the macon people have every very right to to man took that are very generous legal immigrationt flow be followed according to the law. and that it reflects their wishes. the american people are good and decent people. they are not asking for anythinf extreme. what is extreme is the idea that we systematically refuse to guarantee the laws of the united states be executed. the actions and policies advanced by president obama and apparently even more radical it's not clinton is a radical thing. it is not t

the dream act was designed to give children brought to the united states by their parents who were undocumented a chance, a path toward legalization, a path towards citizenship. these were people now in their teens and early 20's who were brought to the united states as infants and children. it was not their conscious decision to come to this country. it was a decision by their parents. they've grown up in the united states. it is estimated 2.5 million young people came to this country under these circumstances. so many of them have done everything they have been asked to do. completed their education, stood up in the classroom every morning and pledged allegiance to that flag, the only flag they've ever known, become part of america, excelled academically, started dreaming about what they might do as americans to make their lives better and this country better. but the law in this country is very harsh when it comes to these young people. the law says in its bleakest terms they have to leave the united states for ten years and petition to come back in. here they are 18, 19 years of age being told now that you've graduated high sc

. >> he is present in the united states legally. he hasga united states. >> reporter: i did receive a statement from the metropolitan washington airport's authority. they say the private security contractor which employs ali master security properly vetted him, which raises more questions for the congresswoman. i'm going to tell you what she wants to see done now. >>> prince was known for living a clean, drug-free life. friends said he lived with constant pain of years of performing. it now looks like efforts to ease that pain caused the music icon's death. the minnesota medical examiner has released the results of prince's autopsy. he died of an accidental overdose of the powerful painkiller fentanyl. it is meant to treat patients with severe pain or manage pain after surgery. it is more potent to morphine. prince was found dead in an elevator inside his paisley estate in minneapolis. >>> muhammad ali is suffering with a respiratory issue. he is in fair condition. his stay is expected to be brief. >>> you can buy donuts. tomorrow is

basically, he gave illegalal persons, established by the laws of the united states legal status to participate as american citizens on virtually every matter of importance. it's pretty exceptional. former secretary clinton says ia will induce comprehensive immigration reform with a path to citizenship for those within my first 100 days. in other words, she would give legal status, citizenship to everybody who came to the country illegally. that is just a very damaging thing and has remarkable consequences and impacts on the legal system and it also incentivizes more people to come to america. american people have every right to demand that are very generous legal immigration laws be followed according to the law. and that it reflects their wishes. the american people are good and decent people. they are not asking for anything extreme. the what's extreme is this idea that we systematically refuse to guarantee the laws of the united states to be executed. the actions and policies advanced by president obama and apparently even more radical policy by secretary clinton is a radical thing. it is n

when it comes to imgracious, he wants to make it easier to enter the united states legally, and on theto choose which he adds has been the law for several decades. recent polling, by the way, is on gary johnson's side. shows him gaining traction right now in our latest cnn/orc poll. he's polling at 9%. sometimes in other polls getting as high as 12%. so in a year that's veered away from all norms, could a third-party candidate actually attract more voters than ever? joining us now is former u.s. congressman and three-time presidential candidate ron paul. congressman, you ran on the libertarian party ticket back in 1988. later you tried to get the republican party nomination and didn't get it and right now donald trump and hillary clinton have high unfavorability ratings. do you think this could be an election where the libertarian party is a real shot? >> i think it's a real opportunity. i don't want to be so bold as a real shot and tell people that i'm predicting that he's going to win, but i think it's a real opportunity, and who knows what will happen. you know, there may be some ch

states ise united stronger because of legal immigrants. most immigrants are hard-working people. they come here to the united states to work because there is opportunity here. so the united states really is a wonderful place for immigrants. the line that you see cross mexico into the united states is the same line come a long line in the philippines. at the american embassy. because everyone wants to come to the united states. host: why do you think that is? caller: because the united states is really known to -- it is a rich country. you have a lot of opportunities here. i think the united states will be stronger if we have legal immigrants. have acourse, if you large group of people, you can't avoid having a small amount of , you know, not good people. criminals,e who are people who will rob or kill other people. so the united states has to be very -- you should screen people who are coming in. host: what about what you just heard from u.s. customs and border protection, that they are notng a rise in people from just mexico, but all over the world who are coming to the border, c

registering, hoping to start a new life, some children are american citizens, born in the united states, were legaltentially once again they have to start fearing about this notion they could be deported, these families could be ripped apart. >> i feel bad for them. that is why i have been aggressively saying we need to do immigration reform. we need to find a solution to allow the folks to become taxpayers. doing that through the executive order and putting both sides in the corner frankly i think has done more harm than good in the long run. we were close. i can't predict whether we would have reached bipartisan immigration reform. we were way further along in achieving that until the executive order. i know people were asking administration to delay on doing that because we were making progress. it needs to happen going forward but within the construct of the constitution which is the house of representatives and senate to make those decisions. >> i know you don't support donald trump as the next president of the united states but he makes the case that if you don't vote for him hillary clinton

currently about 20,000 legally immigrate to the united states each year.nd this legislate would cause it in half. he would push for a legislate i reform to change this and increase the immigration ceiling for mexicans wishing to immigrate. it was not successful. so soon after in august 1977, president jimmy carter followed through with johnson's idea and supposed legislation to raise the ceiling of the number of mexican immigrant who is could migrate and to establish a legalization program for undocumented immigrants already in the united states. congress did not legislate on a proposal but the congress and his administration created what was called the select commission on immigration and refewee policy. to study and evaluate the existing law, policies and procedures guarding the decision of guarding refew jees. the committee made us a report to the newly effected president ronald regan. he committee reported on the $5 mated 3 -- $3 million to million they apparently saw the problem of undocumented migration as one of the corrective power of labor demand.

you want to make sure if a terrorist from belgium comes to the united states legally, a visa waiver programnd says you go to a gun show, don't buy from a registered dealer, go to a private individual, they have a lot of guns out there, pay cash, take that gun and go kill earn manies. that's possible right now, isn't that? >> that's possible, right now? >> it may be. >> but there's not -- first off, we suspended the visa waiver program in the omnibus program. >> people from france and britain can still come over. >> there's not going to be a terrorist here from belgium going to a gun show -- >> but how do you know that? >> what we have to be careful of, people call it a gun show loophole. >> it's not really a loophole. it's legislation saying that private individuals can sell their weapons to anyone they want and there's no background checks necessary. >> well, yes, for instance, if my dad sells me his gun, he doesn't have to get a background check -- >> if he goes to a gun show, he can sell that to anyone. >> he shouldn't. he can't. >> a private individual can sell it to anyone without a ba

how is that selective legalization of cannabis affecting demand for other drugs within the united states? is there a substitute affect? people going for what is legal or going for illegal? is there any counsel affect -- causal effect? >> it may be. eventually is an area. that is a domestic question. it's a good one for dea. good one for the department of health and human services. i'm a brave man, but i take i will stay out of that one from this particular podium. >> deana whether the ship from cocaine to heroine was consumer driven or was it successful interdiction of cocaine or marketing initiative by heroin? >> little bit of all three. particularly number three. there is clearly a foreign opponent. here is bill brownfields theory which i think is shared by a tremendous number of people in the drug control and abuse community. as he worked our way to the 1980's and 1990's, the american medical perfection, to their credit, responding to the needs and requests a demand of their patients on matters related to management, asked for and received from the non-black-market pharmaceutical indu

correct, that if you took the entire number of agricultural workers who were needed in the united states and were legally allowed to come into the united states, texas alone needs three times that number of agricultural workers. have become very dependent on our current system, is a system of encouraging illegal immigration. on the other hand, when it comes to low skill level jobs like in hotels or what have you, there is some truth, that there are a lot of people who are in the u.s. legally who are disenfranchised by people who are here illegally. though thek that numbers of overall illegal immigration are allegedly down, there is athat difference in the people who are coming in what i mean is seven years ago, maybe eight out of 10 were workers, one of the things our reporting has revealed is now you're looking at seven to eight out of 10 who are mothers or small children. it does have the potential to really be a drain on the system and limit what is available to u.s. citizens. host: a recent headline to go with that, three illegal immigrants including three-year-old child abandoned by human smugglers.

inspected by customs and border protection officers and field operations and introduced into the united states legally and once they do that they go to warehouses where commodity may be broken down into four of five different truck so they came in on truck and they go to this particular warehouse and go to distribution points throughout the country. that's just the way our economy works and now we are able to get the product to be introduced into the country from mexico to different areas of the world and different areas of the country to the united states. there are plenty of opportunities to make these entries into the united states so that commodity or that truck is soon to be used in a struggling event there's plenty of opportunities for people and/or narcotics to be introduced into that commercial environments are checkpoints afford us the opportunity to screen that traffic once again before it's leading the actual border area and before it rolls into major highways and byways of the united states. >> how are you going about screening here? what would a truck or a noncommercial truck go through?

the majority, the great majority of the people on the list are not citizens and not in the united states legally and therefore they cannot buy guns. , they used further these words. 5,000 people will be directly affected. people on the no-fly list. should we have the sanity to pass the law that would let the people on the note my list -- e he no-fly list from purchasing guns. -- we have the courage would speaker, if you allow us to vote, it would only affect 5,000. maybe my colleague who have spent the night before notice about me five minutes ago, the capitol police joined us on the floor. they brought their dogs, their bomb sniffing dogs, and they went through each and every aisle on the floor looking for explosives. i will tell you within my next time. they might look at the terror watch list. there are 5,000 potential people on that list that can buy a gun and can buy explosives. not that place to start looking. our republican colleagues won't allow us to in limine -- eliminate 5,000 people that are thought to be terrorists that have a clear indication that they are somehow connected to terr

my client deserves to live in the united states just as any other legal permanent resident deserves tohe united states. >> reporter: but right now, there is no criminal court in the world where ali can be tried for war crimes because the international war crimes court didn't even exist during somalia's civil war. however, the u.s. government says it's been aware of ali for years. based upon allegations that he had been involved in human rights violations. but wouldn't answer any of cnn's detailed questions. i think it's really hard for the average viewer to listen to this and the fact that he is working in an airport that we all fly through on a regular basis. >> it's deeply disturbing in part because that is a position of trust. you abuse that authority terribly in somalia, in my opinion, he should be in jail. >> ali ended up in the u.s. after being deported from canada because of his past. he got a u.s. visa through his wife, a somalia woman who became a u.s. citizen. adding to the outrage, his wife was convicted of immigration fraud for lying. she claimed she was a refugee from the

the dream act was designed to give children brought to the united states by their parents who were undocumented a chance, a path toward legalization, a path towards citizenship. these were people now in their teens and early 20's who were brought to the united states as infants and children. it was not their conscious decision to come to this country. it was a decision by their parents. they've grown up in the united states. it is estimated 2.5 million young people came to this country under these circumstances. so many of them have done everything they have been asked to do. completed their education, stood up in the classroom every morning and pledged allegiance to that flag, the only flag they've ever known, become part of america, excelled academically, started dreaming about what they might do as americans to make their

correct, that if you took the entire number of agricultural workers who were needed in the united states and were legallyowed to come into the united states, texas alone needs three times that number of agricultural workers. have become very dependent on our current system, is a system of encouraging illegal immigration. on the other hand, when it comes to low skill level jobs like in hotels or what have you, there is some truth, that there are a lot of people who are in the u.s. legally who are disenfranchised by people who are here illegally. though thek that numbers of overall illegal immigration are allegedly down, there is athat difference in the people who are coming in what i mean is seven years ago, maybe eight out of 10 were workers, one of the things our reporting has revealed is now you're looking at seven to eight out of 10 who are mothers or small children. it does have the potential to really be a drain on the system and limit what is available to u.s. citizens. host: a recent headline to go with that, three illegal immigrants including three-year-old child abandoned by human smugglers. don

program having to do with amnesty, and in a sense recognizing legal status for immigrants who otherwise were here illegally, under the united states law. so the president after issuing the executive orders had them challenged in court, and of course those -- the legal challenges were ultimately upheld in texas. worked it way to the united states supreme court, which is divided 4-4, on many issues right now. so eight justice does the tragic death of justice scalia. the court now confronts many major issues, one of which involves the president's authority, there is a matter of administrative law or constitutional authority. he can issue these orders. and that is the question that now is in court. we don't know where it's going to come out or don't know whether it's going to come back. ... >> >> talk about the extent of the book or elsewhere that may be of interest to less -- are. >> to areas one already mentioned about first ladies i have written on first ladies including a book on jacqueline kennedy and got to think that we could have the possibility to have hillary clinton as the nomination of our party not only the first woman pr

i hear about legalization and in a sense, how can we ask for cooperation on this issue when states in the union are legalizing marijuana and cannabis in the united states of america. i would like to think i'm not an idiot. have an answer and it is not a bad answer. at the end of the day, it does complicate at least this discussion and dialogue. >> my question was different. how is the selective legalization of cannabis affecting demand for other drugs within the united states? is there a substitute affect? people going for what is legal and not going for things that are illegal? is there any causal effect in terms of demand? >> it may be. eventually is an area. that is a domestic question. it's a good one for dea. good one for the department of health and human services. i'm a brave man, but i think i'll stay out of that one from this particular podium. shiftyou know whether the from cocaine to heroine was consumer driven or was it successful interdiction of cocaine or marketing initiative by heroin? >> little bit of all three. particularly number three. there is clearly a foreign opponent. here is bill brownfields theory which i think is shared

that had to do with amnesty and, in a sense, recognizing some legal status for immigrants who otherwise were here illegally under united stateslaw. so the president, after issuing these executive orders, had them challenged in court and, of course, those legal challenges were both ultimately upheld in texas, and it worked its way to the united states supreme court which is divided 4-4 on many issues right now with eight justices due to the tragic death of justice and scalia. the court confronts many issues one of which involves the president's authority whether as administrative law or constitutional authority he could issue these orders. and that is the question that now is lingering before the supreme court. we don't know where it's going to come out, or we don't know whether it's going to come back. so that issue is now, of course, one that is at least undecided in terms of our history. and i guess i can't, you can't blame me if i didn't talk about the ending of it in the book. [laughter] >> paperback version. >> right. [laughter] and when the paperback comes out, you'll know who worked the hardest with regard to that chap

basically he gave illegal persons established by the laws of the united states legal status to participate as american citizens on virtually every matter of importance. it's pretty exceptional. and former secretary clinton said i will induce comprehensive immigration reform with a path to citizenship for those within my first 100 days. in other words, she would give legal status citizenship to everybody that came to the country illegally. it's just a very damaging thing and has remarkable consequences and impacts on the legal system and it also incentivizes more people to come to america. the american people have every right to demand that our very generous legal immigration flow be followed according to the law and that it reflect their wishes. the american people are good and decent people. they are not asking for anything extreme. what's extreme is this idea that we systematically refuse to guarantee the laws of the united states be executed. the actions and policies advanced by president obama and apparently even more radical policies by secretary clinton is a radical thing. it's not t

in 2000 united states and nearly 50 other nations issued the declaration, urging signatories including united state to ensure the legal systems facilitated the just and fair solution and claims were resolved based on the merits of the claims and the relevant documents parties. the actual ensure he the u.s. government won't meet these international pledges. fundamentally it enables to proceed to the merits of the claims in a court with jurisdiction. the act creates a limitation period of six years from when claimants actually discover the identity and location of the art for cultural property and information to indicate it is theirs. they waste time space-bar is like state limitations. the doctrine of latches. important doctrine developed on assumptions that do not apply to the holocaust. the act also represents a compromise, the ability to find art is better now and claim it should be given a chance, but the chance should not last forever. in addressing civil procedure and remedies to the violations of human rights, the act falls within the jurisdiction of the set committees here today and requires federal congression

united states. thompsons was one of the few places transgender people could hang out publicly in the city. >>> sunday is the first anniversary of the supreme court decision legalizing same- sex marriage in the united states. a gallup poll out this week estimates that 123,000 same-sex couples were married since then and today nearly half of them living together are married. that is up from 38% a year ago. >>> our coverage of san francisco "pride" continues all weekend long. and on cbssf.com. and you can check out the cbs guide to san francisco "pride" 2016 as well as the guide for taking public transportation to san francisco "pride" events. >>> another story we're watching, two people killed in a wildfire tearing through mountain communities in kern county. two fatalities were in lake isabella a recreation area east of bakersfield. the fire has destroyed at least 80 homes and is threatening 1500 more. right now, this fire is at 0 containment. a state of emergency is now in effect. cbs reporter danielle nottingham joins us live from lake isabella tonight. >> reporter: this is one of the more aggressive fires we have seen so far this summer and here's why, it left be

on this issue, i hear about legalization and in a sense how can we ask for cooperation on this issue when states in the union are legalizing marijuana and cannabis in the united states of america. now, i would like to think i'm not an idiot. i have been in this business for 37 years. i have an answer to that question, and it's not a bad answer. but at the end of the day, it does complicate at least this discussion, this dialogue. >> my question was slightly different, which is how is the selective legalization of cannabis affecting the demand for other drugs in the united states? is there a substitute effect? people are going with what's legal and therefore not going for things that are illegal and therefore potentially could expose them to penalties? is there any causal effect in terms of demand? >> maybe it's not there long enough to study. >> it is an area where i'm normally willing to opine on almost any issue on the planet. that is purely a domestic planet. a good one for dea, a good one for the department of health and human services. i'm a brave man, but i think i'll stay out of that one from this particular podium. >> do you know whether the shift in

it was illustrated this thursday, the front page discusses the legal battle in the united states withabor party and conservative spirit jeremy corbyn -- conservatives. jeremy corbyn and lawyers are denying calls to step down. angela, a former business secretary who you can see on the right of the image here, also launching her candidacy is theresa may, and she has penned a column in the times this thursday saying i will reunite written. in has made her announcement the times paper, invoking her qualities as home secretary but promising under her leadership will putrvative party itself at the service of ordinary working people and strive to make written a country that works for everyone. her announcement to run means she will square off against the mayor of london, boris johnson. arethe moment, bookies putting the odds on johnson to win. thisother big story thursday is the aftermath of that horrible attack. >> that is right. as is the case with russell's and paris attacks and numerous have takenrtoonists center stage with very evocative to express their grief. i want to show you this c

legal challenges. do you believe there is a humane remedy that can deal with the contentious issue? >> what is important is we follow the constitutional structure. you mentioned immigration. remember this. the united states is a country of legal immigration. the problem we are having and the problem that leads to the conditions that are problematic is the fact that the president and others have promoted an illegal immigration environment. what is required is for the united states congress and the branch of government under the constitution with the authority to write immigration laws to figure out the solution. not the president, not the court, not the eu or some other authority. we have to follow the constitutional order in this country if we will make things work properly. >> do you see parallels with what happened with voters in england to the anxiety and concerns here over immigration with efforts to continue to allow thousands of refugees from countries that isis pledged to infiltrate knowing that the vetting process is not equipped to handle the people coming in? this is an issue when it comes toting that will express concern to our own top national security advisers. >> right, there are parallels

and then in 2009 the united states nearly 50 other nations issued the declaration urging the signatories including united states to ensure their legal systems facilitated the just and fair solutions and that claims were resolved based on the facts and merits of the claims and all of the relevant documents submitted by the parties. the hear act will ensure that the u.s. government meets its commitment to these international pledges. fundamentally but for a a limited time it enabled claimants to proceed to the merits of their claims in a court with jurisdiction. the hear act creates a limitations period of six years from when claimants discover the identity and location of the property and information to indicate it is theirs. it waves time based bars like u state limitations periods. important doctrines developed based on assumptions that do not apply to the holocaust. it represents a compromise, the ability to find art is better now and claimants should be given a chance, but that chance should not last forever. in addressing civil procedure and remedies to the violations of human rights, the hear act falls within the jurisdiction o

in their say country and they exactly the same thing is happening in the united states, but because these people in europe are legalorkers, this is the difference in the united states with the legal. what you need to do to resolve the situation, and this is what president obama tried to do, as they call the workers legal, stop the chain gangs essentially of massive illegal workers by giving them legal status, and that we american workers and contractors will not be undercut because of the fact that they will be in a much stronger and say, no, i am not going to get paid a rubbish wage for the hard jobs that i do. host: simon, thank you for the call. we will let our guest respond. guest: the caller makes a very good point about as the workforce becomes more global and as this kind of "gig economy" makes it easier for business to hire a worker, not only in romania, in terms of the european union, but you can hire them from india, thailand, philippines, and these are countries now that also have workers that a very skilled. for these workers and the countries, it is a good thing. for the workers here, it creates quite

reporter: last year as millions celebrated the landmark supreme court decision legalizing gay marriage across the united states, marking progress and equality, retaliation was looming. >> as we've made progress on the lgbt rights front, there's been a tremendous backlash. >> reporter: george and chris zander were victims of the backlash. they daylighted for five years. in may to 14 they wed. >> we did it because we loved each other to the point where we knew we weren't going to leave each other. we were soul mates. >> reporter: the honeymoon was cut short. after leaving a popular palm springs gay bar, they were attacked by two men. >> they hit me in the back of the head with a tire iron. i woke up to george screaming, anding. >> reporter: chris was knocked out, and 71-year-old george pushed to the ground. >> i just wish i could have more to help my husband. >> reporter: george broke his hip in two places. he underwent surgery and was expected to make a full recovery, but he died a few weeks after the attack. >> it's something that i'll never forget. it's something that will probably haunt me for the rest of my

legally. the kid in sandy hook, his mother bought that gun in the united states, through retailer, legally. even though the terrorists in california obtained the gun -- they gave in to the terrorists. host: there is a lot to learn about what happened in the background of this attacker. you talk with the guns were purchased, this is the abc news reporting on the guns and omar mateen used at the shooting in the pulse nightclub. illegally purchased the guns the he had on him within past week, even though he had been known to law enforcement for years, federal officials confirmed to abc news the law-enforcement sources told abc news he had at 223 caliber ar type rifle and a glock handgun out the time of the shooting early on sunday morning. he says he bought legally. purchasese legal determined that he had been interviewed three times up to the shooting. his name came up with two different cases. such a permission would not show up in a background check because both cases were closed. law enforcement sources confirm that mateen was on the radar, but not as early on the watchlist. himould not ha

status on the immigration -- justice roberts: lawfully present does not mean you're legally present in the united states. general verrilli: right, tolerated -- justice roberts: i'm sorry, that -- just so i get that right. general verrilli: yes. justice roberts: lawfully present does not mean you're legally present. general verrilli: correct. justice alito: but they are the dapa beneficiaries may lawfully work in the united states; isn't that correct? general verrilli: that's right. justice alito: and how is it possible to lawfully work in the united states without lawfully being in the united states? general verrilli: there are millions of people, millions of people other than the dapa recipients about whom this is true right now. and this gets to the point of why their reading of section 1324 is completely wrong. justice alito: i'm just talking about the english language. i just don't understand it. how can you be -- general verrilli: well, let me -- justice alito: how can you how can it be lawful to work here but not lawful to be here? general verrilli: let me just go through the reality here, and i'l

and then in 2009 the united states and nearly 50 other nations issued the tarazen decoration, urging the signatories, including the united states, to ensure their legalystems facilitated the just and fair solutions and that claims were resolved based on the fact and merits of the claims and awful the relevant.coms submitted by the pearts. the heer act will ensure the u.s. government meets its commitment to these international pledges. fundamentally but for a limited time it enables claimants to proceed to the merits of their claims in a court with jurisdiction. the act creates a limitations period of six years from when laimants actually discover the identityity and location of the art and information that it is their. it waives state bars and the doctrine of latches. important doctrines developed based on assumptions that do not apply to the holocaust. but the act also represents a exroo mize. the ability to find art is better now, and claimants should be given a chance, but that chance should not last forever. in addressing civil procedure and remedies to the violations of humanity rights, the act falls in the jurisdiction of both subcommittees her

. >> first of all, there's a lot of legal mexican migration to the united states. family reunification, people who are petitioned for by the relatives. back in my time, it was for that decade going forward about 100,000 people a year gaining legal entry into the united states, getting their green cards and eventually citizenship your we mustn't forget that. there's another reason you want a wall or a protection of people come into play. it's dangerous out there. you don't want people, these terrible stories about dozens if not hundreds of people getting killed coming across one way or another illegally. we want to have some kind of orderly system between the two countries. that would include, as governor ridge said, some kind of mechanism where people can go back and forth i can also get employment. they guest worker, the visitor program is not a bad idea. the german guest worker program is not a bad idea. by not having that kind program, by abolishing it in 1965 when lbj did under pressure from the afl-cio, what happened was there was no way for mexican to come and

. >>> it has been exactly one year since is the supreme court legalized same sex marriage in the united states. a poll out this week estimated 123,000 same sex couples were married in the year since it became law. today nearly half of same sex couples who are living together are married. that's up from 38 percent a year ago. but not everyone is celebrating. search groups are working to overturn the ruling saying the 5-4 decision was unconstitutional. >>> the united states supreme court did not have any jurisdiction or right to redefine the nature of marriage and to steal from the people their right to vote on such questions. . >> it takes it back to the reason john and i started to fight to live up to our promises. >> both sides expect the next big legal battle will grow out of the current debate over transgender rights. >>> meantime communities across the nation hosted gay pride parades today. thousands celebrated in new york city. they also remembered the orlando victims. 49 people in white veils walked in violence representing those killed in the shooting at the night club pulse. security w

legal. that does not do them as rightful citizens or ask for permanent residence. in the 1970's, the united states is going through a very severe recession. the idea of illegality starts to rise up in united states -- starts to rise up and the united states becomes very, very popular. they are not really welcome in both places they reside. >> there was a law passed in 1986. what was that? ana: in 1986, the u.s. passes the reform act. it was passed originally -- the primary intent was to introduce employer sanctions. they were supposed to be penalties imposed on employers who knowingly hired undocumented immigrants. but the law also has other clauses like, to create a new extended program. it also legalizes a lot of undocumented workers. 2.3 million mexican become legalized thanks to the immigration reform act. finally, it military rises the border and makes it much harder for mexican to continue coming to the united states. ironic, youuces is would expect if it is harder for mexican to come, fewer mexican scum. but we see the opposite. a culture of migration had been created. the structure of migr

. >> there is a lot of legal mexican migration to the united states. people who are petitioned for by their relatives. for that decade going forward, about 100,000 people year gaining legal entry into the united states, getting their green cards and eventually citizenship. so we mustn't forget that. you wantanother reason a wall or protection for people coming in that way. it's dangerous out there. these terrible stories about dozens if not hundreds of people getting killed coming across, one way or another, illegally. we want to have some kind of orderly system between the two countries. that would include, as governor some kind of mechanism whereby people can go back and forth and can also get employment. worker programt is not a bad idea. by not having that kind of program and abolishing it in lbj did, there was no come here andn to then go back home without fear of going back-and-forth across the border illegally. so what did they do, they stay, and eventually brought their families over. so by canceling that program, we increased mexican migration

there are millions and millions of guns in the united states owned legally and handled responsibly. oris the few who are sick extremist, that they could get these guns legally or illegally, and they will commit the crimes regardless. you keep going down the path and everyone says stricter gun laws. if everyone knew what the gun laws in place work, then the background checks be performed are, you would find a lot of laws are in place. secondly, one of things mentioned earlier by a previous caller, a generalized statement where the one caller was grouping anyone who has a disagreement or a difference of ornion with an extremist highly likely to become a terrorist. this falls into a watchlist you are referring to. there are no rules as to how you get on the watchlist or any protections in place as to whether you are on and off the list. senator ted kennedy was on the list. guest: we can keep the american people safe without rounding up and taking everyone's guns. law-abiding individual, you should be a will to keep your gun and protect your home. what the american people are asking is

same-sex marriage was legalized in the united states a year ago.oll show that's 120,000 same- sex couples were married since it became law. half of those living together are married, that's up from 38% a year ago. several groups however are working to overturn last year's ruling saying the 5-4 decision was unconstitutional. >>> at 7:53 a look at the top stories this morning. the death toll continues to rise as historic flooding sweeps through west virginia. at least 23 people, including an 8- the fast-moving flood waters. as much as 10 inches of rain fell in a six to eight hour window in parts of the state. more than 500 people statewide have been rescued and at least 100 homes seriously damaged or destroyed. that includes this home that burst into flames as it floated downstream. >>> out west, a california wildfire turns deadly. police tape surrounds the home where two people died in the fast moving flames. it starts outside of bakersfield. it is threatening more than 1500s and 100 have already burned to the ground. from the air, six tankers and s

there are only 43 states in the united states where you can purchase them legally.eral law can change that tomorrow and federal law can say if you're on the terrorist watch list you can't have a weapon during that time. that should happen. >> that's where i would agree. you can't ask the fbi to do something that is not legal. and if the law says that you can take somebody from the terror watch list or any of the lists that they've got and prohibit them from guns, that's one thing. but the fbi can't say you know what. that's like the hippo warnings. it's a doctor can't go to someone and divulge your medical records. that's the problem they have. >> gentleman, we must leave it there, but it is a conversation that will continue in the days ahead of course. thank you, mike, thank you, steve. we're going back to orlando after the break on more on what officials are learning about the gunman. 2k3w4r50i6r7b8g9sds music: "sex machine" by james brown ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ i am proud of you, my man. making simple, smart cash back choices... with quicksilver from capital one. you're earning

along with five pakistanis who have applied for asylum and been granted and are living legally in the united states. if you cannot control your country, your border you cannot know who is in your country. i don't know how you pretend to provide security for americans if you don't know who is here and you can't control your borders and it is not just the southern border though that gets the most publicity but there are hamas and extremist cells north in canada and that border is wide open and -- trish: we have a lot of work to do. one thing that strikes me interesting as a journalist and you as well, this story hasn't gotten a lot of traction. we are talking about it right now because it is important to us and to the show. the washington times reported on it, the daily mail reported on it, it hasn't hit mainstream media. >> i don't know. it seems it is considered a trump talking point, we are not going to discuss our border. donald trump in a weight legitimized for half of the americans who call themselves democrats or independents talking about this crucial problem which should confront all of us.

first, that the united states would stay together, and second, that legal slavery would he abolished. that is it. reconstruction would determine other questions. would confederate officers and the leaders of secession be punished for what many northerners viewed as treason? what exactly did freedom mean for the 4 million black southerners who escaped bondage because of the war? be secededms would states rejoin the union? with the social and economic structure of the defeated confederacy change? what would become of the american west? i think we sometimes forget that the question over whether slavery would exist in places even in my home state of utah, new mexico, california, kansas and nebraska, had done much to bring on the war. howthat the union had won, would these new places be governed? so today i went to suggest that understanding reconstruction is just as critical as causes, theg the course, and the outcome of the civil war itself. in many ways, reconstruction did just as much to shape the future of the united states as the war itself. how one should understand reconstruction i

i want to share with you that on the question of the court of the united states and the legal enforcementoodo protect us from the criminal element, mitch mcconnell is absolutely rocksolid. it's a pleasure for me to serve with him. time and again, he stood up to members of our own congress to promote the kind of judiciary that you and i believe in. i told our colleagues a couple of years it go -- maybe i am warped in the brain -- i said the american people are not happy and i'm not happy. i don't know about you, but i am on their side. people don't feel good about the economy. they don't feel good about a lot of issues facing us. they don't field good about the hostility to religion that they feel out there. they are not happy about it and the polls show that. the wrong track is exceedingly high. it has remained that way in question after question with people saying we are on the wrong track. i think it is. i think the american people are fundamentally correct. i believe it's right and moral and just and biblical and that we have a lawful system of immigration for the nation that we serve and

protected millions of illegal immigrants from deportation and given them permits to work legally in the united statesent obama was visibly angry and even took a thinly veiled shot at donald trump. >> leaving the broken system the way it is that's not a solution. in fact, that's the real amnesty, pretending we can deport 11 million people or build a wall without spending tens of billions of dollars of taxpayer money is abetting what is really just factually incorrect. we don't have to wall ourselves off from those who may not look like us right now or pray like we do or have a different last name because being an american is about something more than that. >> the president also blasted republicans, blaming them or the dead lock in demanding that senate republicans allow hearings on merrick garland, his supreme court nominee. >> republicans in congress clearly are woefully allowing the supreme court from being fully staffed and functioning as our founders intended and today's situation underscores the degree to which the court is not able to function the way it's supposed to. >> joining us now with rea

of this issue of whether or not people on the terrorist watchlist should be able to legally buy guns in the united statesuse. this is something i've been doing for a long time. this issue has, of course tied up some people on the hill rob portman seeming to go back and forth on this issue. >> the wisconsin poll out of likely voters clinton is up by nine points over donald trump. it will be interesting to see how that case falls out. case from hampton roads, virginia my colleague, kate snow picks things up now. >>> good afternoon to you.