what you want to say, then it's just a matter of how unfree you are, but you referred to the united states len ideal. almost a gold standard >>> i'm more critical these days of the united states. we do in europe as well. of course i don't believe in unlimited free speech. i think that incitement of violence, people should not say to go out and kill muslims or people with red hair or whatever it is. i'm in favor of a few other limitations. i think the trend now is that people are playing the offence card in order to shut down speech that they don't like. that is a slippery slope >>> when you say you were more critical of the united states now than you were when it published the book. what's the problem some >>> it's the social control of speech, that, in fact, i still believe that the united states has the best possible protection of free speech in the world. it's just the people are not always pushing the limits of free speech. because of social pressure, there is a lot of things, there are a lot of things that people do not say out of fear what might happen to them, not in terms of the law but in t