of national intelligence testified with the congress of the united states last year that the nexus between crime and terror was in fact one of five key threats to the united states national security today. now there are many different parts of that nexus and i will leave it to our panel to really discuss that for you in depth, but part of it of course is the ability of groups that are using organized crime and using crime to raise money to finance a variety of terrorist activities and other national security threats including insurgency. in addition to that there is going to be a sharing of logistics. there is going to be a learning of tap tics from one group to another. we see particularly the nexus of this in terms of locations in areas for example of collapsed government and failed government or areas such as venezuela which have regimes that are in fact very difficult for the united states in foreign policy. so there are many different interrelations here that unfortunately seem to be getting more serious by the day and we have a panel that i think is certainly one of the best panels one could possibly put together to talk about this. the real top experts in the united states

united states national security agency is taps directly into the kitchen wing seems like it will be up to the store emails and use information of what the program code named muscular had easy access to the appointed agent e mail yet. hughes is due to that system to lack of oversight at the end it's the activities undertaken at the seats. i don't like. this is tapping into anyone's private finance. it's quite different. to listen to the cbd. monster that was conducted jointly with britain's gc excuse to be in that spirit of the progress reports the ems hundred and eighteen one million records in one week since the two day operation and in the espionage experts say is based on secret and state documents least one bullet to try to attend whistleblower it would snow again. i the refuse. and more. and. cz the topic thus the eye the love. but don't. it is i love. the moment. at. merit essential intelligence agency may be well known around the world. however its activities on knots. so when in two thousand and seven it was revealed they had been interrogated subjects in the eu territory. ther

home who did he violate his constitutional oath by revealing to the detriment of the united states national securityterest facet but information? >> he did. >> were his actions illegal? >> they were. >> were they unconstitutional? >> they were. -- >> did. snowden mr. snowden put at risk america's national security interest? >> he did. illegal,s unconstitutional revelations help the terrorists who seek to kill americans? >> i believe they will. i would say they have and they will. >> it was recently stated by a leader in europe that it is not done. is it your experience that allies of the united states have spied on the united states historically? >> yes. >> or even as we speak? >> yes. >> we have reason to believe that whatever it is, germany or france or spain or brazil or any other allies, it is reasonable that we are listening to the united states or leaders. >> that is correct. whos it common for those are not united states allies, whether it be russia or china or -- , >> it is reasonable to assume that. >> has that information been made available to the white house? yes. >> hasn't been made ava

this is all this is all part and parcel as you know time of the descending upon the united states of this national security state mentality that's happened since nine eleven and in that in that period of time says nine eleven we have kind of an increasing drumbeat of kind of reactionary fear driven. policies in the united states now in this is one of them to try to cut back against the major shield laws that we got passed back in one nine hundred seventy one seventy two and seventy three we got all these shield laws stablished on the grounds that it was a belief of the state legislatures that there was a clear constitutional right of journalists to protect their competence will lose sources in order to continue to to have the flow of information coming. especially with regard to government corruption and national security matters almost all of those issues arose around national security matters so that the relationship between the right of journalists protect their confidential news sources and the right of the new york times to publish the classified forty seven volumes of the pentagon papers it was an in

this is all this is all part and parcel as you know time of the descending upon the united states of this national security state mentality that's happened since nine eleven and in that in that period of time since nine eleven we have kind of an increasing drumbeat of a kind of reactionary fear driven. policies in the united states now in this is one of them. to try to cut back against the major shield laws that we got passed back in one nine hundred seventy one seventy two and seventy three we got all of these shield laws stablished on the grounds that it was a belief of the state legislatures that there was a clear constitutional right of journalists to protect their confidential news sources in order to continue to to have the flow of information coming especially with regard to government corruption and national security matters almost all of those issues arose around national security matters so that the relationship between the right of journalists protect their confidential news sources and the right of the new york times to publish the classified forty seven biomes of the pentagon papers it was an

navy's -- when i took over in 1997, it was wast after organized crime labeled a threat to united states national security. therefore, the director stated that under the circumstances, the law-enforcement and children's community could cooperate. this is a huge difference, given that with the creation of the hadlligence community, you a sickly awol go up -- a wall go up. this was not allowing a gestapo to go up, a secret police. the difference was a created the , and directed that they would not work closely with the fbi to prevent the two from poor -- forming a partnership and becoming all-powerful. if i were an organized crime, i can say this gangster is a threat to national security, and collection, but could not help us in our criminal case. 9/11, much was made about the culture of the agencies, and that was nonsense. spike and i formed partnership 1990's, and after these directives had gone out wouldcome law, nobody trust able legal, fundamental fact of our system, called the fourth amendment. when you're going to prosecute someone for a cruel case in the united states, the defendant is entitled to k

so negotiations to prevent that are squarely within the united states' national security interest. the american people support these negotiations. a new "washington post" poll shows that americans want a negotiated deal with iran by a two to one margin. the alternative negotiation is not good. in fact, it could lead to war. americans do not want another war, and therefore negotiations are the right way to handle this particular problem with regard to the preventing iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman's time has expired. mr. ellison: support negotiations. we do support them and hope they succeed. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman's time has expired. for what purpose does the gentleman from florida seek recognition? >> request unanimous consent to address the house for one minute. revise and extend. the speaker pro tempore: without objection, the gentleman is recognized for one minute. >> thank you, mr. speaker. recently i received an email from a woman in my district named shannon. she received a letter from her health care provider stat

minister netanyahu was rightly concerned about not only the national security of the jewish state of israel and the national security of the unitedtates and freedom-loving people around the world. let's look at this document that was put together by senator kirk. they would get in cash $60 billion. some of the literature i read said up to $50 billion would be free and available to iran. at minimum they would have act stose $3 billion in cash. this is an actor, the state of iran, which was found illegally

troops in afghanistan, that we remain focused on the united states long-term strategic interest in the region. it's in the united states national security interests for afghanistan to remain stable, secure, and democratic. we've seen what life -- we've seen it from a distance, but we've been able to observe what life under the taliban looks like in afghanistan today and over -- or i should say when the taliban were in charge. and we also can see with the perspective of recent history what it looked like since the taliban were removed. a return to their rule, however, will not only setback the progress that's been made but also will allow the forces of intolerance and extremism to triumph. 2014 marks a significant transition in afghanistan. u.s. and coalition forces will draw down while voters will go to the polls to choose their second democratically elected president. we're considering this year's national defense authorization act with just six weeks remaining before the beginning of 2014. our military families are welcoming back soldiers, sailors, airmen and marines who have seen more than a decade of conflict in afghanistan. mr. pre

international narcotics trafficking, organized crime was then deemed and labeled a threat to the united states national security and, therefore, the directive stated that in certain circumstances law enforcement and intelligence community could cooperate. this was a huge difference given that with the creation of the intelligence community by the national security act of 1947, you have basically a wall go up, and during that era this was the fear of not allowing a gestapo to be great in the united states. not allowing a japanese-style secret police. so the difference was that it created a cia among the other community agencies at the time, and directed that they would not work closely with the fbi to prevent the forming a partnership and becoming all powerful type gustavo. in other words, if i'm running organized crime i can say, this gangster, we will declare him a threat to national security and to every kind of metadata collection, other secret intelligence work that cannot be discovered later and help us in our criminal case. so that was the barrier that went up. after 9/11 much was made about the culture o

. >>> the united states faces growing criticism national security agency's targeted spying. however an alliance was formed after world war two that excluded five countries. it was called five eyes which includes britain, australia, new zealand and canada. 9 officials said other allies including japan and germany have been subject to u.s. surveillance programs. the source added that u.s. surveillance gathering facilities are located at the country's military bases and embassies around the world. "the washington post" said the nsa collected information from the google and yahoo! data centers worldwide. is they posted that the infiltration was on wednesday by edward snowden. and by tapping into the links, the nsa has positioned itself to collect data from hundreds of millions of user accounts, this would include e-mails sent and received as well as text, audio and video. the post says that during a 30-day period up to january 9th of this year, the nsa used the links to collect more than 180 million new records. google said it is outraged at the lengths to which the government s

gitmo detainees to the home countries or transferring them to the united states would pose an unacceptable threat to our national security. however, madam president, we have brought numerous terrorists to the united states for trial and incarceration without adverse effect to our national security. in just the last three years, for example, we have brought three foreign terrorists into the united states for trial. the first is abu ghaith, osama bin laden's son iosamabin ladeno remains in federal custody without incident. the second is abdul abdicator who remains in federal custody. ed third is ahmed dullaney, a gitmo detainee convicted in federal court, received a life sentence and remains in federal custody without incident. moreover, our military has routinely detained individuals on the battlefield in afghanistan and then exercised the discretion to transfer them to local jurisdiction or even to release them. if we can trust our military to make these determinations on a day-to-day basis, we should be able to trust them to make the same determinations in -- at gitmo. the risk that any of these detainees can once again

as an example, in the united states, it appears as though, according to the documents, that the national security agency tracked everyone's phone calls. in order to identify 300 suspects. we had to track according to the disclosures, 300 million people's activities. it doesn't seem right. it seems like overreach. over and over again this needs to be organized. there are legitimate uses of this. this is clearly overstep. in this particular case, we assume that there was monitoring between different computer systems. with enkrepgcryptioencryption. we can stop it. >> google is calling this overreach. you're clearly angry about this.

united states. last week the former national security agency contractor appealed for clemency and said he was readyto testify to congress about u.s. surveillance . but on sunday lawmakers flatly rejected his offer. , ife had an opportunity what he was was a whistleblower, to pick up the phone and call the house committee, the senate intelligence committee, and say, look, i have some information that i -- that you want to see. that did not happen. now he has done this in almost a service to our country. >> a view shared by the chairman of the house intelligence committee. >> he does need to own up to what he has done, and if he wants to talk through why he did those things, that would be the appropriate time and the appropriate way to do it. >> a white house adviser said snowden's, t request is not under investigation. snowden has been granted temporary asylum in russia, but there are growing calls for him to be given refuge in germany after he revealed claims that the nsa tapped the phone of chancellor angela merkel. pierre limiter -- p aaron a lemaitre hasre won the literature prize prix goncourt.

gitmo detainees to their home countries or transferring them to the united states would pose unacceptable threat to our national security. but history has shown that we bring numerous terrorists to the united states for trial, for incarceration. it's had no adverse effect is on our national security. these prosecutions have resulted in hundreds of convictions on terrorism-related charges without apparent adverse effect to our national security. the attorney general wrote the judiciary committee, wrote chairman leahy last week, that terrorist prosecutions in federal courts have been -- quote -- "an essential element of our counterterrorism efforts." and a powerful tool of proven effectiveness. in the last three years, mr. president, we brought three foreign terrorists to the united states for trial. we brought abu gaith, osama bin laden's son-in-law. he's been convicted in a federal court, remains in federal custody without incident. the second is ahmed warasin who pled guilty in federal court, remains in federal custody without incident. the third is ahme ahmed ghailan, received a life sentence, remains in federal custo

united states welcomes investment from around the world, from every type of enterprise and all sectors. we are committed to mane taining the most open and transparent investment environment. our process for reviewing national securityof foreign investment in the united states focuses solely on national security considerations and reviews are pleated within a period of one to three months. so as we press forward, we know where we need to focus our efforts. the priorities just outlined are clear and doable. they amount to real solutions that will make a real difference for our economy now and in the future. and i'd like to close by thanking the commerce department for hosting this summit, as well as everyone in this room for coming today. america has always been known as the land of opportunity. a place where you can make it if you try. and have no doubt, opportunity in the united states is very much alive and well. it's alive for our workers, it's alive for our businesses, and it's alive for all of you who invest here. thank you very much. [applause] >> nexon season, "washington journal" live with your calls in the days latest news. after that, "newsmakers" with health and human services secretary kathleen thelius t

. >>> the united states faces growing criticism national security agency's targeted spying. however an alliance was formed after world war two that excluded five countries. it was called five ewh

. >> cynthia, do you think that the national security objectives of the united states has hijacked culturallomacy from its end? >> i think that's a problem, and i think to come back to our earlier discussion, spencer if you'll forgive me, i think you are asking the wrong question. the question is not how could an egypt you know version of jon stewart advance national interest? but what are those national interests? and that's where we have to step back and look at soft power versus hard power. i think america's strength derives in soft value that is the values, what people believe america stands for. often that is in direct conflict with the policies carried out in the country, support for dictators, we all know the story. artists represent values. they hold up the mirror to society. they are the ones -- the tip of the sphere of the revolution. they are pushing the envelope, questioning, opening the door for others to follow. so any time you try to instrumentalize that and say this artist is going to go out and stand for x, y, z, that is going to be a problem. and it can always provide comm

. >> more headlines, fox news deck: he still refusing to sign a security agreement with the united states. he met with nationaly advisors susan rice this week in kabul. she says if karzai does not sign that deal this year, the u.s. will start making plans to withdraw all troops after 2014. lath i can't's prime minister resigned after a supermarket roof caved in killing more than 150 people. he says he takings responsibility for the collapse. they are trying to figure out exactly what caused it. >>> mixed news on the economy the commerce department reporting a 2% drop' for goods appliances. labor department first claims for unemployment benefits last week fewer claims. we don't know how many of them simply stopped looking for work lack of good paying job. more from the news deck right after this. >>> emergency crews evacuated run heads of people from their homes in the early morning hours of today after a train car started leaking flammable liquid in ohio. it happened in willard about 65 miles south and west of cleveland. officials say four cars came off the tracks at the rail yard there late last night. they b

united states. that is not exactly national security secrets. o the state department gets an f, too, because they released still pictures of ambassador kennedy at the swearing in ceremony but they controlled what the american people see. and it gets worse. as a reception later in the day, ambassador kennedy made brief remarks to the press but then reporters were not allowed to ask questions. yes, of course over the years ambassador kennedy and her family has been hounded by the media, sometimes brutal and even mean. but this time, she asked for it. she chose to be in the american eye. she wanted to represent the american people as the ambassador to japan. so she owes us transparency. and taking an oath to be ambassador of the united states is very important. we deserve to know, this is not a private wedding with paparazzi buzzing overhead in helicopters. if she wants to hide, she should get another job. don't represent us. it was stupid to start her day the first day excluding the media and more importantly can excluding the american people. that

not just over the nuclear issue but regional issues that are great concern to the united states and it's national security including conflict in ir ia, including saudi arabia and perhaps above all including israel's security. >> that seems to be the balance here. no one expects iran to become friendly to the u.s. or interest but 30 years after the tortured relationship it is a significant breakthrough. i want to point to something richard haass wrote. the accord is better understood as a ceiling than a freeze. it establishes a level of npgs that is far more intrusive than what existed of the net result will be to slow iran's progress towards nuclear weapons capability, increasing the time and warning the world would have between any iranian decision to produce nuclear weapons and when it would actually achieve that goal. ayman, i take that time line to you because we're looking at a congress that seems to think it should set the next deadline. what is the international view of the next six months? >> the way i've heard it described, this is not an event, an agreement, this is a process. what you have unfo

certain countries would move in a way that creates a security challenge to the united states but we send our sons and daughters abroad when we think the national security of the united states is at stake. if i take your argument to a logical conclusion i would in essence abdicate the u.s. role in so many different dimensions in a way in which we would not pursue our national interests. let me turn to professor bradley. i want to thank you, i read your testimony as a hole in addition to listening to your synthesized version and is considered testimony. i look forward to hopefully engage in you, as i am sure senator corker and.com on the package, you raise concern about the reach of future implementing legislation for the treaty even if there is broad agreement that existing u.s. law is sufficient to implement the treaty and you raise concern that the advisory committee creates could invalidate u.s. roads even if the power to do that is not in the treaty. we adopt a broad set to address these federalism advisory committee power concerns and last year my description of it is we used the belt and suspenders approach to address these concerns but n

united states. >> is a big divide. that would be understandable. concerned about their national security. ey other allies. they're nervous. france out of all of the countries that causes trouble, they're very critical of the situation. let's think about the united states. do we have a consensus? when the president wanted to ask congress about if we should bomb syria are not maira not asking congress about engaging are not engaging with a coury with the regime that has been not mad terrorist list for 30 years. so there is no consensus, neither here nor overseas. the problem is the administration in my view is deciding to get to an agreement, wherever be and then it would build on its teacher. the problem is that they want to give us an agreement and use it against our allies. confidence, that is the agreement. lou: in a difficult place, but frankly if he is the front man for an agreement and strategy in which you use an agreement coming effectively a treaty as a bludgeon against our allies and as a starting point for a true change of facts and events on the ground, you have committed an eno

minister netanyahu was rightly concerned about not only the national security of the jewish state of israel and the national security of the united states and freedom-loving people around the world. let's look at this document that was put together by senator kirk. they would get in cash $60 billion. some of the literature i read said up to $50 billion would be free and available to iran. at minimum they would have act stose $3 billion in cash. this is an actor, the state of iran, which was found illegally creating nuclear material for their stated purpose of creating a nuclear weapon to use to wipe out not only israel, but to wipe the united states of america off the face of the map. and if there's anything that history has taught us, mr. speaker, it is this -- it is that when a madman speaks, freedom-loving nations should listen. the leader in iran is called the supreme leader. he's not called that for no reason. it isn't the president of the country who is truly the throne in iran. it is the religious leader named khomeini. the president's -- the presidents come and go but khomeini, the supreme leader, remains the same. his an

different ups and downs, this is a new scenario in which the united states and israel are at loggerheads over an immediate national security initiative of the united states-- namely, the negotiation of a first step agreement with iran. the prime minister of israel says it's dangerous-- not just for american interest but for his interest. the united states president and the spokesman for the white house has said that if you are opposed to what is being put on the table, are you a warmonger. and so this is a clash unlike any i've seen in 30 years in washington. >> brown: and your sense is that holds00, in a sense, any peace talks with the palestinians? >> to be precise, israel's confidence in america as a mediator in the israeli-palestinian negotiations is totally derivative of its confidence in the iran talks. >> brown: let's get hussein ibish's assessment of that. >> i think that's a very good summation of what the prime minister of israel's office thinks and says. they have, i think, framed everything to do with the israeli-palestinian negotiations, including the cancellation of this extraordinary 24,000-unit plan, includ

we're all committed, all of us in this body, to protecting the national security of the united states and the american people but guantanamo undermines these efforts. our national security, our military leaders have concluded that keeping guantanamo open is itself a risk to our national security. the facility continues to serve as a recruitment tool for terrorists. it weakens our alliances with key international partners. guantanamo doesn't hold terrorists accountable. the military commission system for trying these detainees does not work. the federal courts have recently overturned two guantanamo convictions and opinions are actually going to prevent the military commission prosecutors from bringing conspiracy and material charges against detainees. that's a fact, incidentally, acknowledged by the lead military prosecutor at guantanamo. the charges, however, can be pursued in federal courts, in federal courts, where our prosecutors have a strong track record of obtaining long prison sentences against those who do us harm. since 9/11, federal courts have convicted more than 500 terro

state. >> the award was established 50 years ago by president kennedy to recognize people who have made remarkable contributions to the security or national interests of the united states. >>> you already wear a seat-belt in a car. soon you'll have to buckle up on buses. the federal government ordering all new tour buses to have safety belts in 2014. an average of 21 passengers on tourists on motor coaches are killed in crashes every year. 8,000 more are hurt. the new rule does not apply to city transit or school buses. >>> southwest airlines the latest air line to ease electronic rules for passengers. passengers may use certain devices in airplane mode during taxiing, and takeoff and landing. jetblue, american, united, have already made the change, as well as delta. >>> cupertino have cleared the way for apple to make a new headquarters. the tax break is considered the last hurdle. all that's left is the ground breaking and the construction of the nearly 3 million square foot campus. the design looks like a spaceship. the new campus will have its own transit center and a pavilion to unveil new products. >>> a new cbs poll out tonight shows a third of americans

united states welcomes investment from around the world , from every type of enterprise and in all sectors. committed to maintaining the most open and transparent investment environment. our process for reviewing national-security implications and foreign investment in the united states focus solely on national security considerations and the reviews are completed within that time of one to three months. so as we press forward, we know where we need to focus our efforts, the priorities i just outlined are clear and doable. they ought to real solutions that will make a real difference for our economy now and in the future. endo of like to close by thanking the commerce department for hosting the summit as well as everyone in this room for coming today. america has always been known as the land of opportunity, a place where you can make it, if you try. and have no doubt, opportunity in the united states is very much alive a while for our workers, businesses, and half for all of you who invest year. thank you very much. [applause] >> incredibly important, the conflict of universal service, the idea that all americans, no matter where you live should have access to comparable and affordable telecommunications servi

and i think that to the extent it gives our national security advisor additional stakes in responsibility. it is helpful in his relationship with the united states. ambassador,are an how did you interact with the national security advisor compared to how you interacted with the foreign secretary? well, of course any ambassador reports formally to the foreign secretary and that remains the case in my case. aboutr example, you are to have a visit by the prime minister, you might direct your tactical advice on handling a visit by the prime minister primarily to the national security advisor as a person who is on the spot during the visit. the foreign secretary is in a different league, in a different category from the national security adviser. he is the member of cabinet responsible overall for foreign affairs and that is different from the role of a senior official, however much support folder has been expanded. occasion where the two roles and two lines of communication cause a difficulties? >> not in my experience, no. i think it will -- i think our system works differently from the u.s.. the policies which you do see regularly in the american

united states welcomes investment from around the world, from every type of enterprise and all sectors. we are committed to mane taining the most open and transparent investment environment. our process for reviewing national securityof foreign investment in the united states focuses solely on national security considerations and reviews are pleated within a period of one to three months. so as we press forward, we know where we need to focus our efforts. the priorities just outlined are clear and doable. they amount to real solutions that will make a real difference for our economy now and in the future. and i'd like to close by thanking the commerce department for hosting this summit, as well as everyone in this room for coming today. america has always been known as the land of opportunity. a place where you can make it if you try. and have no doubt, opportunity in the united states is very much alive and well. it's alive for our workers, it's alive for our businesses, and it's alive for all of you who invest here. thank you very much. [applause] c-span is live for the private civil liberties and oversight board. the board during the session will be hearing from officials who deal with the fisa court. >> good af

that is the vision behind the united states national action plan of women, peace and security which hillary spoke about just a few minutes ago. and that's why we're committed to bringing the perspectives of women and their full participation to bear going forward. now, what has moved me and i mean moved me, in my meetings with an impressive group of afghan women, when afghan women move forward, believe me, they never want to go back. not to the days when the taliban ruled afghanistan. not to the days before the taliban when the country was torn apart by violence. and that is why it is so important that we keep investing in and defending the progress that empowers afghan women as well as men to have their voices heard and to buy into their future and shape their future. what has been achieved is nothing less than remarkable. and if would have been more than a tragedy if the world ever allowed this progress to be threatened. or worse yet abandoned. so the question now, where do we go from here. we're mindful of the challenges that afghan women ten to face. this is a critical moment. many of t

more compounded because the victims were young and had come in the united states with their dreams within reach. >>> well, national security agency spying programs have drawn a huge backlash from privacy advocates and a lot of americans. now one group is trying to get the supreme court to take up the case. what that might mean coming up. the abc news correspondent amy robach has now revealed she has breast cancer and found out because of a segment she did for good good -- "good morning america." that's next on fox news deck. if you think a prune is a prune, you haven't tried sunsweet, the amazing prune. enjoy plum amazins, diced prunes. i'd put these on a salad. these would be perfect for cookies. delicious and nutritious sunsweet, the amazing prune. who gets the allstate safe driving bonus check. rock beats scissors! [ chuckles ] wife beats rock. and with two checks a year, everyone wins. [ female announcer ] switch today and get two safe driving bonus checks a year for driving safely. only from allstate. call 866-906-8500 now. [ dennis ] zach really loves his new camera. problem is...this isn't zach. it's a friend of a f

united states would have to take. the saudis would like the u.s. to launch military action, but they won't do it themselves. >> the gulf nations have seen the united states as guarantors of their security both during the cold war and after. the fact remains the united states has global interest and the most important dr. is stablity. it's not seeing the united states choose sides and some of these national and sectarian challenges in the region. for the united states to retain it's yesterdayiblity and fo cre. what is different between the o saudis and the bush administration? >> first the world has change the. the world has largely changed due to the facts that we are coming off the u.s. interventions in afghanistan and iraq. and we can't down play the arab spring and the u.s. must not focus on the government in the rylegion, but theleregion, but e region. the bush administration was singsingly focusedded on focusee regime. and when saudi arabia was more important to the us in the after math of al qaeda than it nowers the american people and that iss that president obama's focus on making the united states or ridding the united states of energy depe dependency and the t of the world. >

. >> this carries the risk that the president of the united states would have fewer options to fulfill our national security objectives. >> hagel said no other nation has the will, the power or the network to lead the international community. but he said sustaining that leadership will depend not only on the extent of its power but on an appreciation of its limits. he said americans need to adapt by building the capacity of their allies. >>> japanese automaker toyota is said to revise its operating profit. the new figure will bring it closer to the record high set before the global economic crisis. the automaker will revise its operating profit for the current fiscal year upward to $22.3 billion. it will be the first time in six years that's exceeded $20 billion. toyota officials will also present their earnings report for six months up to september. they're expected to post an operating profit for the term that exceeds $12.7 billion. the officials say the revenues are increasing as sales pick up overseas and that's due to a weaker yen. they also attributed the increased profits to a cut in purchasing and p

and national security interests the first time i heard that. and the national interest of the united states to attempt to draw the line. and how to push this case. is that what you are telling me. and hurting national security? >> there is a real risk in courts getting involved be finding a line between war like and peaceful purposes. and when it is drafted broadly. there are additional risks in terms of the very act of line drawing, case by case judgments about what constitutes a violation and what doesn't is going to undermine the ability of negotiators to make treaties in the future. >> you did not give a line to the chief justice's question where there was a treaty that included the federal structure, gave the treaty where the president is required to set aside any state law that in his view contravenes the national interest of the structure, you have given us no principles the other way. >> what justice kennedy would decide in this case for the court to conclude that the jews -- the local limit the petitioner is advocating here as applied case by case to local limit is not one that is

certain countries would move in a way that creates a security challenge to the united states when we send our daughters of broad when we think the national security of the united states is at stake, so if i was to take your argument to a logical conclusion, then i would advocate the u.s. role in so many different dimensions in a way in which we would not pursue our national interest, or that is your point of view, and i respect it. let me turn to professor bradley. i look forward to hopefully engaging you, on the package and in your testimony, and you raise concerns about the reach of implementing, but you raise concerns and we were addressing these federalism advisory committee concerns, and i think last year, my description of it is the approach to address these concerns, but now we are in the territory of the suspenders and a team of engineers to supervise the whole operation and i want to ask you this. assuming we could adopt a set that could satisfy your concerns, which may be the concerns of others, as well, and i am optimistic that we can, do you think we need to have the bond case be completed? >> my view is that they are not sus

i think to the extent it gives our national security advisor additional responsibilities is helpful in his relationship with the united states>> when you were the ambassador in washington, how did you interact with the national security advisor compared to how you interacted with the secretary? >> in the u.k.? >> yes. >> any ambassador reports formally to the foreign secretary. if you were about to have a visit by the prime minister, you might direct your tactical advice on handling of visit by the prime minister primarily to the national security advisor. secretary is in a different league from the national security advisor. he is the member of cabinet responsible for foreign affairs. that is different from the role of senior official. >> was the reverend occasion where having the two -- was there ever an occasion where having the two cost difficulty? -- caused difficulty? not in my experience. less pronounced in the british system. i have not detected that over the period of the last few years. >> in the last parliament, the foreign affairs committee published a report. there was a lack of a dedicated ministerial focus wit

to president united states would have fewer options to fulfill our nation's security object our poll a ghost in no other nation has the will to power or the network of alliances to meet the international community. he said sustaining that leadership will depend not only on the extent of its power but on an appreciation of its limits. he said nagging need to adapt by building the capacity of their allies. time now for the latest in a business news the europeans have been gritting their teeth and enduring tough austerity measures for some time but at the show steve ninety at the end of the tunnel. i didn't see that joins us now from the business stats tell us more about that i can say we look at the beast inside gdp we saw contraction last year up in the same thing expected this year but thinks may be changing in two thousand fourteen so people in europe. we finally be able to be the sign of relief the european commission and to think positive growth next year in the eurozone. eu officials say the reasons gross domestic product could fall of zero point four per cent this year compared

through strong and prince p.m.ed diplomacy, the united states of america will do our part on behalf of a world of greater peace, security and cooperation among nations there he is, the president of the united states, a brief statement about six minutes or so. the president praising this interim agreement with iran to ease international sanctions. modestly, the president said in exchange for greater transparency and a scaling back to a certain degree of iran's nuclear program over the next six months. the goal being that a new agreement would be achieved. that's what the president wants and what the president made clear. he also made clear if there are increased sanctions against iran as some members of congress are pushing for that could derail the process and undermine the u.s. cooperation with the other permanent members of the security council and germany, the six parties that have been part of this negotiation with iran. candy kro candy kroely -- crowley is watching what is going on. he is reaching out saying i understand you're concerned but in effect saying give peace a chance. >> yes. and we already know, basically, i think what the reaction