capabilities, matthew bryza, former director of european and eurasian affairs at the united states national security councilo me a couple of days ago that the russians will advance during this year, next year on the 25th, we can expect a counteroffensive from the armed forces of ukraine. later, this information was literally confirmed by the president's advisor in a couple of days. josefana of national security jake sullivan. and the russians have already voiced their threats in case of supplying ukraine with f-16s. they somehow compared it even to the prospect of using or using nuclear weapons, that is, it is a much more serious story for them, and they are afraid of it. what difference does it make, which, whose plan, the priority was and remains the ukrainian plan. it is not about london-berlin. or anyone else, we are talking about ukraine. i don't see anyone going to use nukes because of the f-16. russia did not use nuclear weapons, when tanks appeared and did not use it when atakams, hymars or something else appeared. therefore, i do not see that this will change anything, nor do i think that f-16s in

and also it shows how i relate to the fact that the united states have stuck to the membership in the united nations security council. it is totally unacceptable. i'm the saying that right? absolutely. we will delve no doubt into us obstruction. as you say, i want to the practically speaking the stuff uh, given what is played out of the you and whether practically this makes any difference to the suffering of palestinians in gaza and promising inside the occupied westbank is not thoughts and not enough sort of fluid it's very little if you compare it to what needs to be done, nothing else behavior in uh on data mining. what was it possible that good event sort of ceasefire, when how much accepted what was proposed to them by the united states, egypt and after they would have told that is an acceptance. and once from us accept to this, is it on the mind? it's a, i'm nothing you know initiated is enough, i hope,

it was white house correspondent, kimberly hill kits has the reaction from the united states and national security council spokesperson john kirby speaking on behalf of us president to buy and saying that a it has been known for quite some time that the us present supports the 2 state solution, but what he doesn't support is the recognition of a policy and state through unilateral recognition, such as has been done through by the recognition of ireland is being norway, recognizing a policy and st, unilaterally. what he prefers is that it be done through direct negotiations by the parties in directly go she ations. what he is also saying is that the us president has for ra, his political career, whether it's been as a president or vice president, even as a senator in the us congress. he has always supported a 2 state solution. but he does not support that is done as it has been done and recognized uh, utah, laterally. so this is something that the white house is very comfortable with and hasn't vocalized it. and so this is something that the white house is once again saying that they are not happy with. th

expects that the united states, which is a very solid supporter of israel, will veto the resolution at the un security council of united states as a permanent member of the united nations security council. and they have the ability to veto any resolution that goes before it. now it's important to note that israel was quite outraged in the aftermath of the vote in the general assembly. they accuse the united nations of sympathizing and backing terrorism. here's what these really representative had to say. destructive vote is not only opening the u ones, doors to the terrace supporting palestinian authority. if it was, then it would be bad enough. things of the 7th. you'll have failed to even call them out by name. so i'll remind you, each the terrorist of how much with sick and twisted i run the, the very by the established to prevent eva is now well, tell me a terrible state into its ranks. now even prior to the resolution passing, we heard outcry about the close relationship the united states has with israel and how the united states is using its power as a permanent member. ready of the security council to over rule the majority opinion and sentiment in the world. he

perhaps the most careful, if you want to call it that, reaction, came from the united states from the national security council, issuing a statement saying that the images of the aftermath of that attack were heartbreaking, but, at the same time, it understands that israel has the right to go after hamas, but it should do its utmoist to protect civilians. israel says two hamas commanders were killed in that attack. 45 civilians, they say were also killed among them. that area where the attack took place, israel deemed it safe for palestinians to find shelter. well, they are now moving away, of course, from there, once again, in other parts of gaza, knowing very well that there is no safe place in gaza, frances. >> claudio lavanga, thank you. >>> officials in papua, new guinea say more than 2,000 people were buried alive and now presumed dead after a landslide on friday. the catastrophe struck the mountainous interior of the country. the stunning new estimate triples the original toll cited by authorities in the oceanic nation. it's unclear how they reached the new figure. a local u.n. official acknowledged the

membership of countries in the united nations takes place in the united nations security council, but the united states alone has blocked this path. the purpose of friday's vote in the general assembly is to put pressure on america. this country vetoed the draft resolution for palestinian membership in the united nations for 3 weeks , while 12 other members of the united nations voted in favor. they gave. the solidarity of pakistani students with the palestinian people, the participants in a conference held for this purpose, called for the unity of the islamic world to stop the crimes of the zionist regime. a group of pakistani students and youths in a conference at the foot of the throne of pakistan announced their direct support to the people of islamic resistance in palestine . they will be spread in this meeting with the presence of political, religious and active leaders. social and collective a lot of pakistani students were held, the people present criticized the dual policies of western countries towards the palestinian issue. we have various demands from international organizations , the first

united states. with the national security council issuing a statement saying that the images of the aftermath of that attack were heartbreaking, but, sta at the time, it understands israel has the right to go after hamas but should do its best to protect civilians while it does so. while, in the end, israel says two hamas commanders were killed while they say 45 civilians were killed alongside them. now, as we know, that area where the attack took place was deemed safe by israel for palestinians to find shelter after they were displaced from other places in gaza. now they have to move again. those who survived the attack, knowing very well there is no safe place in gaza to go to. frances? >> claudio, thank you. >>> officials in papua, new guinea say 2,000 were buried alive in a landslide. it triples the original toll cited by authorities. it's unclear how they reached the new figure. an official speaking to the a.p. acknowledged the number would remain fluid. authorities fear a second landslide in the area and the spread of epidemic. >>> police in los angeles are searching for a gunman who shot a sta

the membership of countries in the united nations takes place in the united nations security council, but the united states alone has blocked this way. the purpose of friday's vote in the general assembly is to put pressure on america. this country has been drafting the resolution for 3 weeks he vetoed palestine's membership in the united nations. while 12 other members of the united nations voted in favor. the secretary general of the united nations warned about the consequences of the extensive military attack of the zionist regime on rafah in the south of the gaza strip. antónio guterres stated that israel's ground operation would be unbearable and said that a ground attack on rafah would be very painful due to the devastating humanitarian consequences and its effect on the instability of the country. the secretary general of the united nations asked the international community as well as the zionist regime to stop the attacks and try to achieve a permanent ceasefire in gaza. zionists in different regions of the land the occupying forces asked the cabinet of this regime to agree to the immediate exchang

can be said that this role is similar to the role that the united states is playing in the united nations. in fact, go to the security council and there it seems that america will stop this once again and this will actually prevent the recognition of the palestinian state , something that america claims is the solution for the issue of palestine. yes, the americans consider themselves committed to the security of the zionist regime, and they have declared this clearly, and there is no difference between the democrats in this regard. and there are no republicans, which means that the zionist regime enjoys bipartisan support in the united states. well, for example, you mentioned the opposition of the united states to the draft resolution of the united nations regarding the acceptance of palestine's full membership in the united nations. it was a few weeks ago that the americans had a budget. approving 26 billion dollars to help the zionist army , the americans are playing a dual role. on the one hand, they are exposed to the pressure of public opinion , domestically and internationally, and on the other hand , they have that c

the vote of the united nations general assembly asks the security council for the full membership of palestine once again. to check about 3 weeks ago, the united statesoed this resolution in the security council. the full membership of palestine in the united nations means recognizing it as a country. at least 10 thousand people from rifa are out this is the estimation of the officials who say that the zionist attacks have not left a safe place in gaza. field news has a similar narrative. there have also been reports of the attacks of this regime's fighters on the western areas of this city. a broader operation that is contrary to the claims of this regime in response to global criticism. in one of these attacks, eight members of the same family were martyred, but the palestinian mujahideen responded to the zionist aggression by striking the occupation forces. they announced the arrival of the regime's engineering forces, which led to their deaths and injuries. operation against a zionist military base in karam abu salem, other actions of the qassam battalions were announced on friday. in the name of allah akbar alhamdulillah, lord of the worlds, pea

united nations, will have to vote once again, and 2 thirds of the countries will have to approve it. now it's very unlikely that will happen with the united states planning to veto this resolution after un security council. however, there has been some interesting proceedings in the hall of the united nations general assembly and, and the security council. the latest of which was the, is railey representative, physically shredding a copy of the united nations charter and ripping it up and saying that the un charter is no longer in effect on it. the proceedings violate the un charter. now this did not go over well with you and officials, and we actually had far han hawk, the un spokesperson condemning these the attributes as he called them and reassuring the world that the un charter is still in full effect. now the is rarely representative also declared that the united nations was playing with giving recognition to terrorist to compare the palestinian authority to nazi is. here is some of what we've heard from the is really representative of several days. destructive vote is not only opening the lines doors to the terrace supporting palestinian authority. if it was then it would be bad enough. things of

of the espresso tv channel secretary of state of the united states, former director of european and eurasian affairs at the us national security council. glory to ukraine, dear mr. ambassador. i congratulate you. well, the key story: the united states gave the go-ahead. congress, the senate and president joseph biden have signed an extremely important package. it is about money and finances. but etekens will also supply. we understand that, rather, it was etekems that they were a certain red line. i do not know in what way the communication took place, but as far as we understand that the kremlin tried in every way. to prohibit the transfer of long-range missile systems to us, and now in washington a historic decision was made. yes, of course, this is a historic decision, and you and i have been waiting for it for more than one month. you may recall that back in october of last year, when speaker johnson first became speaker, i expressed concern that he had consistently voted against military aid to ukraine. however , it happened that the weight of his responsibility helped him in another way. on the need to help ukraine. under consid

security of these routes, especially the water route the north-south corridor of the army navy is 5 years old. china and russia, two permanent member states of shanghai and the united nations security council , have brought to the northern indian ocean in the form of a maritime security belt joint exercise. however, the navy of the army is not satisfied with conducting exercises to prove that iran can do business in other sea passages , it has also sent several groups of ships, the last of which was the 86th flotilla, including the dana ship and the makran port, a trip around the globe with a distance of more than 65 thousand kilometers in 8 months now after gaining all these experiences. commander of the navy the army says: if our economic community wants to visit any port and any waterway in the world , we will provide its security with pride, but in the end it sat down. more than a thousand servants were present in this ceremony in a book called the strategic teachings of the mission of the 86th naval squadron, mohammad javad reza soltani of the sed and broadcasting agency, and honoring the servants of astan imamzadeh saleh of tehran. he has been a servant of astan imamzad saleh in tehr

security council. reconsider the matter. a $143.00 nations supported the motion which grants the palestinian significantly more rights to participate in general assembly sessions, but not regular voting rights. united states vetoed a security council resolution last month. you may remember that would have paved the way for all of this know ahead of today's vote. israel's ambassador to the un shredded the united nations charter saying that was what countries who support tell us dogs bid to join the e u. r. do s yes. that's what you're doing, right. i asked our correspondent benjamin alvarez group in washington. what this vote by the un general assembly. but it really means it's important to clarify that this vote does not give the palestinians full un membership, but recognizes them as qualified to join. is you said 143 members voted in favor 9 against it, including israel and the united states and 25 countries, abstained in this policy and membership. it will now be forwarded it to the un security council asking it to reconsider the matter. and the result of this vote does not come as a surprise that it was widely believed that the resolution would easily achieve the necessary 2 thirds majority in the gen

court does not have a binding status, its decision is binding on the member states of the united nations and the security council. he apologizes that this requirement should be implemented through the security council, but since the security council is for five permanent members and america has always vetoed any resolution against the zionist regime in this council, it is expected that if it wants to do this again be examined in the un security council, the united states will try again with its all-out support, as it has since the beginning of the war until now, to prevent this resolution against the zionist regime from being approved , so what is expected is that, in fact, with this current situation, it will continue the zionist regime's atrocities on the people of gaza and rafah continue will have. thank you very much, mr. soltani fard, and you, dear viewers, who were with us during the international part of the salam reporter program. thank you, mrs. hajipour, at your service. i am very grateful that you were with us since 6:30 in the morning. today, on the seventh day since the helicopter accident of the ma

out of starting in home state is the united nation, is the only reason palestine is not a member of the state of the united nations is because that requires the un security council to recommend date to the un general assembly. the general assembly is bound to vote for it. we know they have the votes that but in the security council there is one nation, the blocks it and that's the united states. all right, james, thank you so much. a key for elder is a political. alice is also a contributor to the is really daily paper harris, and he explains how the is really government's will react to the requisition of an independent palestinian state. and if you look at the, the international response or the impact on his riley position, a visa v, the international community. of course, this is a what we call a uni last or step that a, the goes against and on the hours and the majority of these very can s h is also fee of, uh that, uh, agree to it. but a senior in state especially, not too many. let's really i want to remind the viewers the just a few months ago. the majority i, i believe that it was close to 100 out of the 120 members of nash a pos very weird, a resolution

united nations. something that they've tried to pursue that the united states has blocked and the security council, but that is supported overwhelmingly by member states here at the united nations. he also talked about a way forward and the responsibility of the security council in that regard. not only to bring a lasting peace and political solution to support that through their actions, but also to support the recent rulings by the international court of justice. in regards to recent attacks on rafa, in particular, he mentioned that the israeli occupation authority, as he called it, was not complying with the international court of justice. and he said in fact, it was clear that they would not comply. and he had some harsh word saying that they were cover and have murders as, quote tragic mistakes. so he again appealed to the security council to enforce internation a lot to, to gets roll its responsibility as he put it to uphold international law law by expressing its support for what b i c, j has set it. yes, that's right. to the statement made it clear that as israel community itself is not going t

nation statements from all sorts of governments. but we have to wait and see what the united states will allow at the united nations at the security council. it is a test in many ways for that red line that fight and had drawn a few weeks back. but we've seen him kind of delete those lines before stretch them or re interpret them to fit is really actions rather than confront these actions and follow what a lot of you and experts have said is an an imperative right now an arms embargo and sanctions on israel's, until it stops the mass louder and gaza here and we were talking earlier to use the nickel bit occurs and associate filler, which had them houses as well as the middle east. and listen, he was talking about this being the never ending rules that everything just seems to go around in circles as a ground old guy. and the only thing that changes is the number of people that are killed in gaza. how does, how does it, how do we break, how that, how do we stop that? how do we try and find them in a 2 bed cycle as well? i think the only way to break that is to make this onslaught more costly then uh, not than dialogue. and so you have to,

vote is not binding, and for palestine to join the united nations, the security council must make a decision, which was recently vetoed by the united states. after the general assembly's negative vote, the american representative said: palestine's membership in the united nations is possible through negotiations with tel aviv. iran's representative in this meeting, referring to the role of america as a staunch supporter of the zionist regime he said: america's irresponsible behavior as a permanent member of the security council is unacceptable and contradicts the request of the international community. the representatives of saudi arabia, qatar, egypt, while expressing regret for the action of the united states in opposing the full membership of palestine in the united nations , emphasized the adoption of a firm international position to stop the genocide of the zionist regime in the gaza strip. the white house spokesman, in justifying the us opposition to the resolution supporting palestine's full membership in the united nations, said: the state of palestine is the result of negotiations between the parties. united nations. the resoluti

security council with the us with washington. and that pro, vetoed a proposal recommending the admission of the state of palestine to full membership in the united nations. in april 12 security council members voted in favor that you pay in switzerland, abstained in only the us voted against it, even with countries that don't recognize the public opinion states backing the resolution. so 2 days for a solution that is expected to be approved by a large majority, it will then recommend to the security council to reconsider is requesting save. and this resolution up for a vote with also a grant, a new rights and privileges. could you tell us a little bit about what they entail? the diplomats have told us media that the original draft of the assembly resolution was changed significantly to address concerns not only by the us, it is still expected to vote against it, but also by russia and china. because, well, both countries are strong supporters of policy funds un membership. there are concerned quoting it to the soldiers that granting a certain type of rights and privileges could set a president for other which it'd be un members with russia being concern

in a letter to the security council, iran's representative to the united nations stated that the baseless claim made in the recent letter of the representative of the zionist regime is a blatant attempt to divert international attention from the crimes committed by this regime and the genocidal actions of this regime against the palestinian people in the gaza strip. mr. irvani with referring to the operation, sadegh added that iran's action was carried out in the framework of legitimate defense and in response to the repeated military aggression of the zionist regime, especially the military attack against iran's diplomatic facilities. the representative of our country in the united nations emphasized: iran was never the initiator of the war against the zionist regime and has no intention of doing so in the future. mr. irwani added: however, the islamic republic of iran reserves its inherent right according to international laws to respond to any use of force or acts of aggression against its sovereignty, territorial integrity, security and national interests. iran has a number of institu

it recommends the security council reconsider palestine's application for full membership in the united nations. this draft resolution tells us the use of the veto by the united states against the draft resolution algeria submitted to the security council on behalf of the arab group on this matter last month. your excellencies. today marks a defining moment in our history. the draft resolution before you would have a profound impact on the future of the palestinian people. a people who for more than 75 years have endured prosecution and the denial of their most basic rights. a people who have patiently waited with unwavering determination for the international community to champion the right for determination and enable their countries to get full mentorship in the united nations. we are a peaceloving nation. and to effectively serve humanity for the united nations. by exceeding international treaties and conventions and adhering to the united nations charter, and meeting the criteria for membership and obtaining u.s. ignition of 144 states, the state of palestine has demonstrated it deserving space -- it deserves a space in the international community. the countrie

with the full connivance of the united states of america in bilateral relations, and they do not particularly hide, speaking at the united nations in the security council constantly... members of the security council are not fulfilled in terms of security. one reason why the united states is not fulfilling this role, from my point of view, one reason is very simple. washington thinks it can afford it, and the reason washington thinks it can afford it is how key arab countries are reacting to it. such as egypt, saudi arabia, the gulf state, which in no case naturally approve of what israel is doing, but i’m not sure that these countries are ready to take a decisive stance against the united states, you remember, in 73 because of american support for american weapons of israel during what in israel is called the yom kippur war. the arab states declared an oil embargo against the united states, which was very painful, so i don't see anything like that today, or am i missing something? well, you usually always notice everything that needs to be noticed. no, this really is not the case, the position, well, some might call it flexible, but in principle not v

united states, the united states has all, has all the leverage. and right now you have algeria preparing a draft resolution. it's going to go to the united united nations security council, and there's going to be a vote, i think, in the next 2 or 3 days. and all eyes will be on the united states. is it going to turn a blind eye? is it going to again allow israel to proceed with this with this genocide a war? or is it going to finally put its foot down? is it going to at least abstain rather than veto at, at the secure to the security council? so all eyes in the united states right now i've been saying, and many other analysts are missing for months. but the us could end all of this with a, with a phone call. right? um they, they are the ones who are supplying israel with all of this diplomatic support and all of the weaponry that they're using are most of the weaponry that they're using in gaza. so i don't necessarily think we have to wait on is really society to change. we could exert pressure on the united states and, and that's being done domestically in the us right now. it's being done domestically. but the fact remains is that this democratic administration, the

it's elected by the 193 member states of the united nations that joined collection that takes place in the security council and the general assembly . it's israel isn't meant the state of the united nations on the international law . israel must do what it's told. and, but since it's being told the 1st time in january did not come at any acts that could amount to genocide, among other things as well, has killed more than 15000 people in gaza. i know that you're saying searching the very strong orders. but if we look at perhaps the most important one, the one that south africa was asking for more urgently, most urgent need to immediately hold up the military offensive. if you look at the wood in james, i wonder if as well, will find room to maneuver here because it says it immediately holds its military offensive and any other action and offer which may inflict on the palestinian group and gaza conditions of life that could bring about its physical destruction and whole or in part, could israel argue that it's all probations, don't inflict on palestinians and gaza, you know, the conditions of life that woul

united states has not in any way stopped supplying the military support in that regard. but when it comes to rafa, specifically, the united states is pumping the brakes. in other words, what john kirby, the national security council spokesperson said, is that well, it depends on what is real does in rasa. and that is what is really the key here. uh, the united states has made it very clear. he says israel's understood, for some time the united states will not provide weapons if israel decides to go into rafa. so in other words, that pause that has taken place right now. no final decision has been made on for how long that pause will be extended, but it is in place for now. the other thing is, is there are 2 reasons. the united states believes that that pauses necessary. number one is because in the united states, police, it would strengthen her mazda has position at the negotiating table. and the other reason the united states believe that it is necessary is because this really, they believe, are making a mistake with her. uh, an assault on ross are they believe that this would not bring an end to her mas, as the, as rarely believe it would not bring about the in, during the feed that benjamin netanyahu is promis

of this written, but every time that is a united nations security council resolution, israel simply dismisses it because it has the backend of the united states. so that's a very typical response. they just simply dismiss everything. often times they'll say the united nations is simply anti is riley as well. it's so cold, empty symmetric by 10 dismissed the un security council resolutions. this is a little bit more difficult that prime minister benjamin netanyahu is using this tactic once again of just going off to the organization, rather than looking at what the organization has said or whether anything these change. their very convinced is ro, is very convinced that he's going to fight this way the will, the way possible. funds that off divisions mitigates member the will cabinet. you'll have cult, member of the will cabinet, has been, have been very critical of the problem. is that a visual because he simply doesn't have a plan for the day off to and that's something that's good becoming increasingly more obvious. okay. more on con, thank you very much. that reporting there from amman, once again, because it is real, shut down alpha 0 wit

me, matthew bryza, the former director of european and eurasian affairs at the national security council of the united states, yes said that the russians will advance during this year, the next 25th year, may... wait for a counteroffensive from the armed forces of ukraine. subsequently, this information was confirmed literally in a couple of days by jake sullivan, president joseph biden's adviser on national security. and the russians have already voiced their threats in case of supplying ukraine with f-16s. they somehow compared it even to the prospect of using or using nuclear weapons. that is, this story is much more serious for them, and they are afraid of it. what difference does it make which has whom? plan? the priority was and remains the ukrainian plan. it's not about london, berlin or anyone else. it is about ukraine. i don't see that... someone is going to use nuclear weapons because of the f-16. russia didn't use nukes when tanks came out and didn't use them when atakams or hymars or anything else came out. so i don't see that it will change anything. i also don't think that f-16s in ukrainian sk

security council reconsider the matter. $143.00 nation supported the motion, which grant hours to me is significantly more rights to participate in general assembly sessions. but not regular voting rights. united states vetoed a security council resolution last month that would have passed away for that. ahead of today's votes is rails, and bassett, or to the un shredded the un charter saying that that was what countries to support palestine that you joined and you, when we're doing, you're in charge here with your own hands. let's get across to our corresponding and washington benjamin alvarez group are benjamin, what does this vote from the un general assembly need for the palestinians? is that the un general assembly vote just by a wide margin to grant new rights and privileges to the state of palestine? is it what was expected because we knew that there would be a majority in there that is in favor of giving a call this time. all right, but it's important to clarify that this vote does not give the public opinions full un membership, but recognize them as qualified it to join. as you said, 143 members voted in favor 9 against it, including israel and the united states. 25 countries abstained, and

difference to the un security council with the us in april veto with this proposal or recommending the admission of the state of palestine to full membership in the united nations, but a, the us is quite isolated there because in april 12th security council members voted in favor the u. k. in switzerland abstained in only the us and voted against it even with countries that don't recognize the palestinian state backing base of resolution. today's resolution that is expected indeed to be approved by a large majority will then recommend that the security council reconsidered as its request in favor and this resolution for the grant, new rights and privileges. could you tell us a little bit more about what they entail? is this right? a diplomat. so i've told the u. s. media that the original draft of this assembly resolution was change significantly to address concerns and not only by the united states that it's still expected to vote against it, but also by russia and the china because, well, both countries are strong supporters of pol list on un membership, they are concerned according it to these anonymous sources that granting a certain type of rights and priv

me, matthew bryza, the former director of european and eurasian affairs at the national security council of the united statesd that the russians will advance throughout this year, next year, on the 25th, we can expect a counteroffensive from the armed forces of ukraine. later this information literally. jake sullivan, president joseph biden's national security adviser, confirmed there in a couple of days, and the russians have already voiced their threats in case of supplying ukraine with f-16s. they somehow even compared it to perspective application or use of nuclear weapons, that is, it is a much more serious story for them, and they are afraid of it. what difference does it make who has the plan? ukraine was and remains a priority. it is not about london, berlin or anyone else, it is about ukraine. i don't see anyone going to use nukes because of the f-16. russia didn't use nukes when tanks came out and didn't use them when atakams or hymars or anything else came out. therefore, i do not see that this will change anything, nor do i think that the f-16 in will bring victory to the ukrainian sky. they are

we know the united states is working with alliesrk and partns come particularly at the united nations throughgh a recent security councilis issue. to start off, stacker to work, could you tell us what more the u.s. assesses that russia's developing and how is he was working to address this threat? >> thank you, clayton and dr. hamre. really, really happy to be a today on this particular day for may 5 to market even more special. the united states is extremely concerned that russia may be considering the corporation of nuclear weapons into his counter space programs. based we deem credible. the united states has been aware of russia's pursuit of this sort of capability dating back years. but only recently have been able to make a more precise assessment of their progress. russia has claims the satellite is for scientific purposes. however, the orbit is in in a region not used by any other spacecraft. that in some was somewhat unusual. the orbit is a region of high radiation than normal low earth orbits. but not high enough of radiation environment to allow accelerated testing of electronics, as russian has described the

it directly stated that it was notified by the mysql agreements, although they were endorsed by the united nations security council. by the way, this example of the kid for his shame that claimed that the resolution of the united nations security council will not be respected by it. this is what was followed by the united states. they adopted a resolution a couple of months ago, calling to establish these 5 for the holy month of ramadan. permanent representative of the united states to the un madam thomas griffin, abstain from voting if she didn't. so veto that. but she said that this resolution is not legally binding. that means that the mask agreements and the position of the us with regard to the us just to the us decision. i have a direct parallel. never the less i phoned the initiative of the president in early december 2021. we drew the attention to the fact that the situation is becoming quite serious and it is necessary to put an end to the actions taken by the ukrainian regime a violate sentiments agreements. and we propose to conclude to treaties, and we circulate to these treaties in december 2021. the

united states. richard goldberg served on the national security council under president trump he joins us right noward, good morning to you. >> good morning, steve. >> steve: amal clooney that doesn't surprise you, does it. she has been called in to help icc in the past. >> it's just one more antidote here of what a kangaroo court this is. this is not serious. this is not about the law. not about international law. this is about lawfare. that is to use a system of law as a weapon of war. this is a kangaroo court that supposedly is a court of last resort that is now targeting a democracy in israel that has a functioning court system. and, by 9 way, is not a member of the icc itself. international criminal court. they never signed the treaty that makes you subject to their rules. and so if you are a democracy, you have a functioning court system, you have various ways of holding yourself accountable, just like we do in the united states, you are not supposed to be subject to their jurisdiction. so what have they done? they have gone and interviewed hamas. gone and interviewed hamas allies in gaza. we

matthew bryza, ex-adviser of the united states secretary of state, former director of european and eurasian affairs, worked for them now. in the us national security council. thank you. glory to ukraine. glory to heroes. have you never seen a classic in underwear, or something? i wrote a children's poem here, will you listen? the tractor in the field dir-dir-dir. that's why we froze. there are discounts. they are offering 20% ​​discounts on tizin in may in the pharmacies of plantain bam and oshchad. and now oleksandr morozov, political expert, publicist, who is currently in prague, will work on the espresso tv channel. i congratulate you, mr. oleksandr. good day, congratulations. well, it's like a small story when we talk about the arrest of the deputy minister of defense of russia ivanov, that is, a small one in the background general apocalypse, but in any case, this is a very characteristic and possibly symptomatic moment, that is, a person who, in principle, was, well, his main function is to work. mantsem shoigu, that's how she received a black label from the fsb, and we understand that this means that the patrushev clan is more likely to be strength