united states. there _ south—west of the united states. there are — south—west of the united states. of the united states. there are so many people - south—west of the united states. there are so many people on- south—west of the united states. there are so many people on thej there are so many people on the political— there are so many people on the political spectrum _ there are so many people on the political spectrum who— there are so many people on the political spectrum who either- there are so many people on the political spectrum who either say climate _ political spectrum who either say climate change _ political spectrum who either say climate change does _ political spectrum who either say climate change does not - political spectrum who either say climate change does not exist. political spectrum who either say climate change does not exist at| climate change does not exist at all, climate change does not exist at all. or— climate change does not exist at all. or they— climate change does not exist at all. or they say— climate change does not exist at all, or they say that

this very vigorously expansive united states united states that keeps coming back to them demanding more and more land and putting more and more pressure on them. and so in the early part of the late 18th early 19th century the united states encourages. cultural social and economic changes in its in its relationships with with native americans cherokees have a reputation historically as being more receptive to those changes. i think in some ways that's that's a server romantic image as well as some of the other images that circulate in american culture. so cherokees tend to for political purposes tend to play up the idea that they have. adopted elements of your american culture and society and economics in response to these these policies are encouraging those changes, but that's clearly an attempt to mollify the united states and to make the case that the united states can leave the cherokee nation alone and so in the public rhetoric you often get cherokee leaders in the early part of the 19th century say, oh, well, you know we've um, yeah,

i'm millions of people go to the united states every year, the population is growing. the united states has seen around the world as a leader in so many areas and it's going to continue to be that despite the turmoil and the churning the united states is going to be a beacon for a lot of countries for a while to come. so i'm asking for whom, for whom is the united states a free country, right? i mean if we look, i spoke earlier about the millions of black people incarcerated in prisons, uh one of the highest prison population in the world. um when we're speaking about the also again, hundreds of thousands of people who can't make into the u. s. who are undocumented migrants and facing a lot of violence, families dislocated here. now a lot of women who don't have access to abortion. so i want to ask the question. of course this is true. there's freedom. it's a country of great influence. and i also you know, was influenced by the us on a lot of the theories that i teach, for example. um but at the same time, we have to ask ourselves why is the u. s. self proclaimed as the biggest example

state department right now. united states see latin american mainly brazil as part of his gay operates game. i mean, we, on the backyard of the united states, united states have no help a glass in america. oh, brazil. to arrive in better condition of goldman. what the united states do is business and business for corruption and business through over throwing government that are not allow you to them and business through dictatorship. in other news, american citizens should not be worried about or recession. thus, according to the us treasury secretary, who said that the current state of the american economy should rather be described as a period of transition, where despite slow economic growth, there are jobs for those who want them. this is not in the economy, it's in recession. but we're in a period of transition in which growth is slowing and that's necessary and appropriate us treasury. secretary also said that rising inflation in the country can be controlled by june. the thing inflation in the u. s. surging to 9 point one percent effectively reaching its highest rates in decades. now, her optimism is not shared by everyone, includin

but i disagree with the theory that the united states is a beacon of democracy is finished. on the contrary, i think united states is one of the is the world's most important democracy. even today, we saw this at the g 7 meeting recently that the united states was the country that's rallying the rest of the democracies in support of ukraine. so yeah, there's problems in the united states, but there's a turn in such a big deal. you're saying, no, it's definitely a problem and it's certainly a problem. and it's sickening that the supreme court decision which was considered the law of the land for the last 50 years, got overturned and it got overturned because a republican president was able, and a republican senate was able to more or less hijacked the system and get 3 can so ultraconservative justice is put on and that's going to lead to the pendulum swinging the other way. i'm pretty sure that the democratic voters will come out in big numbers, most likely and, and they'll try to get their justice back. the big loser is a supreme court which used to have a very good reputation as dates. and the repetition of supr

china and taiwan, and they begged the china to establish diplomatic relations with united states and china and the united states, back in 1979 over com all the difficulties and normalize the relations on the condition that the united states need to sever its to promote the relations with taiwan. the united states need to withdraw all its troops from taiwan. and the united states need to terminate its defense treaty with taiwan. the so called the republic of china. if the united states want to walk back all these decades of the one china policy, then they need to be prepared to sever diplomatic relations with the people's republic of china and prepare for all the consequences it will incur. no one is not given warning to the united states, and they should be fully prepared for the consequences of promoting one china and one taiwan or to china for example, which is the separation of the motherland as far as charles concerned. and the chinese law does not tolerate any such prospect of an independent taiwan away from china's motherland or at vice president of the center for china and globalization. victor gao, than

united states. it has been for many years now. and people in this region recognize that the united states is destroyed country after country united states and its allies across west asia, north africa, other parts of the world. of course, they have a similar situations of beforehand and today as well. so no, the united states is unpopular and the united states is on the decline as well. you can be unpopular and powerful and impose your will, but the united states is unpopular and it is a declining power. i'm not saying that the united states is a diminished power, but the united states isn't what it was 2030 years ago. and iran, russia, china. these are countries on the rise. they are powerful. china is of course, a global power. russia is a major power. iran is the most powerful country in west asia and the united states . and nato simply do not have the power any more to confront all these different countries at the same time. if the united states and nato could learn to live with the rest of the world, treat them as equals that would be ideal. but of course, that's fantasy the united states and the european simply cannot change

take the stinger missile as an example, then the united states had to turn to manufacturers who had not produced this weapon for 18 years for the united states that is, you will understand that everything is clearly and responsibly treated by the united states that they are even forced to renew the production of such rather high-tech things that really need to be renewed already, but in the united states, that is, i hope that the sums that have been announced now will really go to the renewal of production, that we will receive not just from the stairs, but already a super-super new weapon that is manufactured right now, and if it is put on the stream, then we will it is guaranteed to have both weapons and ammunition. and this is the most important thing. the most important thing is ammunition, and if it all goes according to the logistics chain, then ukraine will not need one or another nomenclature, and we will be able to really feel free in the confrontation with an enemy who, at this stage, does not feel the same need for weapons as we do. and you, all the presidents, say that the distance between the promises of weapons and their supply

the british has penetrating much of the united states state department intelligence agencies, academic institutions, all to more or less influence the united states and government and academia, to being much more in the line with the british. atlanta assist agenda ah, ah, the united states thinks war is war, but business is business in return for help. and in exchange, buffalo global one destroy is the u. s. demands the right to use. 8 british military base is in the atlantic. ah, we didn't receive anything from the u. s. that we didn't painful in 1940 alone written pays the united states for and a half $1000000.00 in cash. a huge amount of money at the time. when roosevelt down to the u. k. his ability to pay, he sends a cruise at the cape town where $50000000.00 pounds of british gold reserves are stored. in desperation, chance you'll rise to roosevelt. in the midst of war, great britain is close to bankruptcy. roosevelt seized no benefits in britain's defeat. after which the us would run the risk of facing war to double cri, doman. liam leaves a de smarter old display. pretty bad sh

cooperates with the united states in terms of transparency and accountability, in particular at the level of the white house and at at the level of the pentagon at the level of the state department and ukraine is only interested in whether this transparency was this trust and as much as possible helps the united states to see how these weapons are used yulia i also talked with oksana markarova and about how the land lease program will work and about other things let's listen to the interview of ms. oksana. we also saw certain concerns from some legislators. in some media it appeared that there is not enough transparent supervision of the weapons provided by the united states states for ukraine at the same time, a white woman to constantly communicate ukraine understands those concerns and is ready to contribute to this supervision as ukraine is now ready and what ukraine is doing to ensure that this supervision is transparent in terms of how weapons are used and what is done with them, see if i am involved , you can to all communications, of course , i can't tell about all of them, because most of them are closed communications. but i think of such a level of cooperat

and, you know, when the secretary defense of the united states states straight up, that the goal and objective of the united states, which is the lead to player and nato, nato does not blame without american approval. nato's policy is to inflict as much harm as possible on russia and ukraine, so that russia will never again seek to entertain a similarly aggressive move that it did in ukraine against anywhere else in europe . that means it the purpose, the mission is to chill russians. that is the mission of nato today, to kill as many russians as possible in ukraine without getting involved directly using ukraine as a proxy force. ukraine is nothing less than an extension of nato's military power, right? now, does he not like the world is thinking into a new cold war which could involve even more countries than in the 20th century? well, the cold war is already, they may not be called by, by that name. in fact, in some ways it is worse than the cold war because during the cold war, there was an effort by the united states and the soviet union to find proxy was bought in distant geogra

will the united states, which is now, of course, the main such engine this military aid may be increased in the coming months, you know, we are now at such a difficult point because the united states mid-term elections for the united states congress, and well, for sure, in the next few months, everyone will be very actively engaged in, well , at least in the congress, they will be engaged in precisely by the election company and this is definitely unfortunately, it will also affect the possibility of additional decisions or the allocation of additional funds for ukraine so far we are using or the administration uses those funds to allocate new new portions of military aid and military specific types of weapons that are included in this forty-billion package that was approved in the spring by the congress of the united states, but unfortunately, these funds will soon be exhausted quite quickly, and now, in my opinion, our key the task of all politicians and all public activists who have connections with the united states and even media contacts with the united states should be aimed at trying to develop a new the possibility of a new aid package for ukraine, i am convinced that it

today i saw information that the ambassador of the chinese people's of the republic of the united states statede situation between ukraine and russia, and it seems to me that this is such a good signal that the parties are trying to reach an understanding because now there is a full-scale war in europe, but we we understand that a full-scale war in other theaters is also possible. and it seems to me that it is precisely the understanding of the responsibility that both leaders bear. it can have a key effect on stability throughout the world. well, let's briefly talk about the topic of ukrainian exports of grain, in which it takes an active part, turkey is now trying to play the role of an intermediary. in your opinion, will this lead to some positive result ? but you know, er, always commenting on this topic, it is very difficult to imagine why they do not talk about the fact that russia should get out of ukrainian ports and russia should get out of the ukrainian cock, in any case, the fact that the negotiations have started, the fact that they are not, are not easy it is obvious that there is

minister of the state of israel, his excellency lapid, and the president of the united states of america, the honorable joseph r. biden jr. [background sounds] >> the president of the united statesf america and the prime minister of the state of israel will now sign the jerusalem u.s.-israel strategicte partnership joint declaration. historic tock can unit reaffirms the unbreakable bond between the united states of america and the state of israel and paves the way to a future of increased partnership based on shared values and a share -- in a shared region. [applause] >> thank you, prime minister lapid and president biden. the prime minister of the state of israel will now make his statement polled by the president of the united states. -- followed by the president of the united states, after which we will take questions from the ifl media. prime minister yael lapid, the floor is yours. >> thanknk you. mr. president, in march 1965 on dr. martin luther king's famous march from selma to montgomery, walking beside him in the front row was a jewish rabbi. when he returned home that day, the rabbi wrote in his diary: todayy i felt my legs were praying. mt. tate of israel -- in the st

state department right now. united states see less in the american, mainly brazil was part of his gay game. i mean, we are in the backyard of the united states. united states have no help with latin america overview to arrive in the condition of goldman. what the united states do is business and business for corruption and business through over throwing government that are not allow you to them and business for dictatorship. ok, let's move to the latest on the conflict in don boss and are some legal updates for civilians have been killed by ukrainian artillery shelling, targeting the luc ganske republic. according to local authorities. the officials also choose ukraine of using us, supplied hi mars miss our systems to fire the city of our chest. below the russian defense ministry said its high precision. missiles destroyed an ammunition store for the highmore systems as well as american supplied howitzers. and in the nets republic, authorities say russia led forces now conducting a clean up operation of a local power station beyond the offensive continues artillery units and neighboring and against been using shells filled with leaflets, urg

united states. [applause] >> specialist five white -- specialist five dwight birdwell. attention to orders. the president of the united statesf america authorized by act of congress, march 3, 1863, has awarded the medal of honor to specialist five dwight birdwell, united states army, for conspicuous gallantry and intrepidity at the risk of his own life above and beyond the call of duty. specialist five dwight birdwell to sick wished himself by acts of talent tree above and beyond the call of duty while serving with c troop third squadron, fourth calvary, in the republic of vietnam on january 31, 1968. on this date c troop was ordered to move south to help repel an enemy attack on airbase. as the c troop column of tanks and armored personnel carriers approach the west gate of the airbase, it came under intense enemy fire from a building at its right. unbeknownst to see troop it had driven directly into a force consisting of three battalions. the column try to push through the initial attack but the lead tank was blocking the way forward. c troop came under hannah meet -- came under heavy enemy fire. specialist birdwell, seein

of the united states, who made a colossal personal contribution both to the rapprochement of the united statesh communist china and to detente with the soviet union bequeathed so that relations in washington with moscow and washington with beijing are better than relations between moscow and beijing together. now the united states is policing the exact opposite. the unprecedented depth and intensity of russia-china partnership that is taking place now and is rightfully one of the most important foreign policy assets of both powers, including the results of american policy, previous administrations have too much influenced domestic aspects. views on china are of course important to prevent the hegemony of china or any other country, but this is not something that can be achieved by endless confrontations . another example of a policy that is counter- productive to american interests, but the only possible one given the quality of their current elites, is pushing hard. throughout the world of bloc approach, attempts to force the countries of asia, the middle east, africa and latin america to ral

telephone conversation between the president of the united states and, accordingly, the leader of the people's republic of china, the president of the united states clearly stated that the united states would provide military and technical assistance to taiwan in the event aggravation of the military situation around this island, and this is not the first such statement by the president of the united states. i will remind you that in may, at a joint press conference with the prime minister of japan, he made it clear that the united states will resolutely oppose any attempts by china to escalate the military the situation around this island. and by the way, it is no coincidence that yesterday the republicans brought up for consideration the issue of a military-technical lend-lease for taiwan for a period of 12 years, that is, the united states gives the people's republic of china a clear political signals regarding possible scenarios of the development of events, how do you listen, the giant conducts military exercises, and moreover, directly to the strait, its own system of reactive means of lights is pulled up in talks about the mainland of chin

you know the first question . that the united states of america is seriously considering recognizing russia as a state sponsor of terrorism a few days ago it seems it was on thursday congress almost threatened the united states state department that if the state department does not recognize russia as a sponsor of terrorism, then the congress will make it its own resolution . oleksandr please tell me. why is it so important to recognize russia and ukraine as a sponsor of terrorism for us and for the united states of america? this is the first question, and the second is the practical consequences or it won't be easy. well, they just recognized, well, i would definitely like to, uh, what russia deserves these merits for, in fact, were recognized uh, from the point of view of the political definitely. this is exactly a-a from the point of view of legal, well, in fact , this status provides for the united states, in fact, the following steps: first - it cannot be given any help, second - it cannot be sold, it is military goods and dual purpose, and this the third is actually what is called expert control

if you're going to talk about the us you would say these united states these united states. that sounds so weird to our ears, doesn't it? so when did these united states which she was used? well into the late 19th century. when did that become the united states? how did you get one country out of these various countries that were, you know various states? now it's important to remember apropos of this that and as we talk about the us constitution. that when the car that the united states has had two lives. i realize it's very easy to forget about the first life because it was pretty short. the first life of the united states was from roughly 1776 to roughly 1788 89. period of a decade and more that's when we were a confederation. then the united states change this government had a second life and it became a federation a federal republic and that's a really key distinction because when the country first started the we say the country but actually the states. all felt very different from one another. yes, they spoke the same language sorta kinda depending whether you're a verm

state with the free world that russia still uses. and formal legal recognition of russia as a terrorist state, in particular, recognition from the united states state department, is needed not as a political gesture but as an effective protection of the free world such a decision will automatically complicate the existence of the terrorist state and will automatically break various political and business ties that russia would otherwise maintain and this will all happen one hundred percent, it will have to be done the question is only in the time and in the format of the adoption of this decision, and the sooner it will be, the less evil russia will have time to do it in the front-line cities and villages, which are increasingly dangerous, the government of ukraine is introducing the mandatory evacuation of residents from the donetsk region . if someone refuses to evacuate, he will be forced to sign a statement accordingly, and while the officials are implementing a new mechanism, the police are evacuating children from the front-line territories of donetsk region, where of the beginning of the full-scale invasion of russia, only according to

give more, however, kiev asks for weapons to this in the united states answered long-range missiles ukraine should not wait after all. the united states is afraid of the third world. that's just in the good of their intentions in washington, you are sure of everything as they write. the media, with such half-measures, the united states only delays the hostilities, while kiev’s weapons are all the same, while the military reserves of the west, according to experts, are almost at the end of the situation. closer to the collapse that there are almost no weapons left in stocks, and the german minister of defense previously admitted in germany said berlin will not give the last to ukraine when its own security is at stake and it seems that all several politicians have begun to get tired of ukraine, there is no unity of opinion, on the eve of the saxon prime minister krechmen called for freezing the ukrainian conflict, thereby putting an end to the economic war with russia however, germany to solve problems with the economy is in no hurry, the german authorities continue to reassure the population with words. you will not be left alone, we