he’s a strategist, the head of the strategic, no, not the grandfather, the head of the united states strategic commandwill pull ukraine and more... there, and if we still come to an agreement with japan and south korea, then we and china will pull, in general, we are pulling, pulling, we can’t pull, yes, yes, but this thinking is characteristic that his predecessor, well, i mean, his predecessor at the post of oksha before charles brown was, after all, an infantryman , miles, who believed that we had to take this all very seriously, we would have two conflicts, one with a major power, that is, with china or. aviators occupied everywhere, i don’t want to say anything against aviation in general , against aviators, but this is a very characteristic way of thinking, crazy, rattling, it’s all gone, don’t offend him, he only flew exclusively in a chair at his desk. he has an aviation uniform, but he is generally a lawyer, he is an unreal flyer, so he’s generally a lawyer, he’s generally a lawyer, in fact, he dealt with, dealt with legal issues, i’m not sure that he flew at all, well, that’s what i’m talkin

richardson, the former commanding general of the united states army north stated that there were strategicesources that were part of the national security of the united states. she mentioned lithium, copper, waters etc. right now, us has 50 minerals considered strategic that are part of its national security. cómo cómo es eso, porque estados unidos considera que el planeta es su seguridad nacional, really funny that the us considers the entire planet to be part of its national security. they've been studying the ways to take natural resources from all around the world since the second world war, so that's why they've been focusing on environmentalism and ecologism. the us had realized that the natural resources were exhaustible even before 1972 conference on the human environment, realized that they were consuming more and more of these resources. they were worried that the third world countries were becoming greater in population and wanted. become industrialized, so there was a competition over the necessary natural resources, as a result, they launched this huge project with the help of

a strategist, the head of the strategist, no, not a grandfather, the head of the strategic command of the united states, pulling , pulling, we can’t pull it out, yes, yes, but this thinking is characteristic that his predecessor, well, i mean, predecessor on post ok-sha, before charles brown there was still an infantryman, mili, who believed that we need to treat all this very seriously, we will pull two conflicts, one from a major power, that is, with china or russia, and the other is small, and now, and now occupy everywhere, and aviators occupied everywhere, i don’t want to say anything against aviation, in general against aviators, but this is a very characteristic way of thinking. graham , all of this, everything, everything has its own aviation history, don’t be offended, graham, he only flew exclusively in a chair at his desk, he has an aviation uniform, an aviation uniform, but he’s generally a lawyer. only in the office, however, this is the thinking, when the peas, you know, in strategy the military-political strategy, the military one is the main thing, the thinking is torn into two, some sa

between the united states and china; there is only one question now: will the economic confrontation develop into the most military confrontation, as politico reports, the command of the us strategicot panicking in vain, because both ukraine and israel, of course, are draining washington’s resources and worsening america’s position in competition with official beijing, so the pentagon has already updated forecasts for the growth of china’s military potential; china now has 500 nuclear warheads in its arsenal, their number will exceed 1.230 years. the deployment of df-17 hypersonic missiles around taiwan is of particular concern and fear to the united states. let me remind you that the ministry of defense has not yet adopted a single model of hypersonic weapons, american. and china itself sent six against the backdrop of the war in israel. saudi arabia to strengthen its chinese military presence in the middle east. moreover, as policymakers report, the united states is imposing sanctions on organizations that facilitate the proliferation and development of ballistic missiles. pakistan, for example, has already shown its disagreement by successfully conducting a training launch of a

strategic and operational airstrikes that have been continuing. jon: give her the vice commander of the largest airborne intelligence awaiting that the united stateswe look at the destruction coming from the air and gaza, and it looks almost indiscriminate. but i am guessing there is intelligence that says those buildings are hamas legitimate targets. >> you are absolutely right. this area is the most heavily surveilled and reconnaissance area of the israeli defense forces. and of course the united states has provided support in that regard. and we continue to do so. we have over 20000 troops just in the east mediterranean with two carrier battle groups and amphibious response group. we are taking risk to do that. but our intelligence are supporting the effort i am sure. those are legitimate targets. hamas is known for decades to use civilians as shields but that's where they build and launch their weapon systems from populated areas and residential areas, apartment buildings, hospitals, schools, all of those buried there all underneath them have a subterranean infrastructure of logistical support and communication support that hamas has spent dec