the couple filed a complaint in the state of colorado prosecuted jack all the way up to the united states supreme court for living consistently with his faith and they called his beliefs despicable and thought they were analogous to the nazis. thankfully the united states supreme court recognized the religious hostility of the state of colorado towards jack and people like him and recognized that that violated the first amendment toow guaranty a free exercise of religion and ruled in his favor with a resounding win but unfortunately the attacks on jack have not stopped. before he even won his first supreme court case, an attorney called jack's job and asked for a custom cake. the attorney specified that he wanted a case that was blue on the inside and pink on the inside and specifically explained that that wasas to celebrate the attorney's gender transition from male to female. well, jack respectfully declined that request because he couldn't in good correspondence create that art work celebrating that message. and that attorney took legal action against him not once but twice in the intervening

the business losses base the state as a result of the and the mississippi supreme court held the support was a legal under state law. as of the case with all the way up to united states supreme court, i hope and pray to god that the supreme court ruled that the board call was late. because i think that's one of the only means with black people have. and i wanted to let people know in the world them know that we will no longer go back to where it was in the past. and the justices hold unanimously that the 1st amendment protects the right to boycott. and what they say is that boycotting is a practice deeply embedded in the american political process is a way in which individual citizens can band together to make their voices collectively heard when individually their voices would be lost or silence. html. a safety says that while it is the immediate beneficiary of the fort gibson ruling, the ruling goes beyond that to allow any organization anywhere to use boy cards and select the buying campaigns to support its political grievance. the are appealing to the district, right? decision in arkansas and i think that's what appeals parts are for us to correct decision

but as the united states supreme court has said, if the reason for a particular curricular decision, including removing a certain book, is because of partizan disagreement of the idea or discrimination against the author, that is not a justification and under the rubric of pornography and obscenity. many states and local school districts are now removed in books by lgbtq authors or about lgb. q characters i hate as endorsements from both cornell west and former tennessee republican senator lamar alexander and nadine streisand writes in this book that nothing strengthens hate groups more than censoring them as it turns them into free martyrs. she on to say that free expression is the foundation of human rights, the source of humanity, and the mother of truth. nadine strossen thanks for being on book tv. thank you so much for having me.

united states, dr. colleen show. good. so now it's my pleasure to introduce the archive host of the united states, dr. colleen shogan. now, it's my pleasure to introduce the chief justice of the united states supreme court, john roberts, jr. and now again, another pleasure to introduce the first lady of the united states of america, dr. jill biden. as we start this ceremony, i would ask that everyone, please rise for the presentation of the colors by the navy color guard. followed by the singing of our national anthem. by millicent scarlett. palmer. oh, say, can you see? oh, is it also eli? it was so. easy. it hurt the tooth. its last gleaming. who brought stripes and a bright star. this. $3 dress for eight or the reports we watched was so good. at least three in her. arms boosted singing tips keep three on my that offer was still there. oh, say it all it stands tall spangled me it with even all those. tv. the. live. thank you again millicent scarlett and once again on behalf of national i archives foundation, i want to welcome you to this very, very special event. our foundation, the national archives foundation has been the nonprofit partner of the national archives for over 30 years. and we are

united states, dr. colleen shogan colleen shogan. so now it's my pleasure to introduce the archivist of the states. dr. colleen shogan colleen shogan. now it's my pleasure to introduce the chief justice of the united states supreme court, john roberts, jr. and now another pleasure to introduce the first lady of the united states of america, dr. jill. as we start this ceremony, i would ask that everyone please rise for the presentation of the colors by the navy color guard, followed by the singing of our anthem by millicent scarlett millicent scarlett. paul. pardon. oh, say hey, can you see. oh, is it also elongate or what? so we hit at the top. it's a classically meaning who's broadcast stripes and bright. is three oh plus eight or the three points we searched worse to leave in. boosting me group. three the late that often was still there. oh see it stands tall spangled. it will even or those. easy you see. in the. thank you again millicent scarlett. and once again on behalf of national archives foundation, i want to welcome to this very, very special, our foundation. the national archives foundation has been the nonprofit partner of the national archives for over 30 years. and we are the ones that support, prom

if you're talking about whether he's able to maneuver into the united states supreme court, there's a better chance. he would have an outside chance of getting the united states supreme court to rule in his favor, which, as we noted, is an untested question that's never before been answered in our nation's constitutional history. >> obviously if he gets to the u.s. supreme court, he's got friends there. >> he's got a lot of friends there. the make-up of the supreme court, conservative majority -- >> 6-3. >> -- right is very much in his favor just from that standpoint. look, the former president has tried various flavors of the argument before. he was trying to stop his aides, his closest advisers in the white house, from having to testify in congress because he claimed that he had absolute immunity. and that fell short. ketanji brown jackson, she was at the time appeals court, and she wrote, presidents are not kings. and i think, you know, that is something that is, i think, going to be one of the things you're going to hear a lot if this ever makes it to the supreme court. it is the

business losses base the state as a result of the and the mississippi supreme court held the support that was a legal, under state law, as of the case with all the way up to united states supreme court. i hope and pray to god the supreme court ruled that the board call was late. because i think that's one of the only means with black people have and i wanted to let people know in the world them know that we will no longer go back to where it was in the past. and the address is hold unanimously that the 1st amendment protects the right to boycott. and what they say is that boycotting is a practice. deeply embedded in the american political process is a way in which individual citizens can band together to make their voices collectively heard. when individually their voices would be lost or silence. html, a safety says that while it is the immediate beneficiary of the fort gibson ruling, the ruling goes beyond that. to allow any organization anywhere to use boy cards and select the buying campaigns to support its political grievance. the are appealing the district court decision in arkansas. and i think that's what appeals parts are for us to correct decisions. wi

[applause] headve takes a lot of bravery to argue before the supreme court of the united states.enter people of color and women this is great. [applause] thanks. god bless america. [laughter] any questions? we have about 10 minutes for questions. okay live question right here. >> yes. with the coalition of black trade unionists state legislature draws those lines. what is being done to make sure the state legislatures have a fair chance for blacks to winre elections there? but question but state legislatures what can we do. they're the ones up to draw the map the reality is we have to vote. we have devote back people who will literally take our interests seriously. alabama for example is a two thirds republican majority did not happenha overnight. we had to chip away at that by going to the polls and vote for people who actually take our interest to heart. sohn unfortunate the remedy is the boat. it is the very thing they are deluding us from having. i think racial polarization voting is very much alive. i understand in california you may have coalitions come together and actuall

that is my point based on the united states supreme court case. i don't understand. christiana: i don't think colorado has yet learned its lesson so it may take a couple shots from the supreme court. you are right that his case won in 2018. it was on the basis that colorado had shown such a religious hostility towards him. the state government officials. now, the way the next two cases began were an attorney who was very targeted and trying to lure jack into more litigation. the state of colorado continues to express impermissible hostility toward him. it is not as overt. they are getting smarter in how this is proceeding, but i think the 303 creative is the clear victory on the grounds of free speech and will be so valuable to creative professionals moving forward. >> thank you. >> madison, young american federation. i have two questions. i need the counselor case, do you know if anyone has been prosecuted under that law? christiana: i do not think i know for sure. i am not deep enough in the weeds to have a good answer for that. >> my other question is about the fir

milligan, when the united states supreme court reaffirmed the strength of section 2 of the voting rights act and struck down alabama's congressional map. the national democratic redistricting committee's 501-c-3 affiliate which is the national redistricting foundation, filed the first challenge against alabama's congressional map. we were joined in standing up against what was a textbook violation of section 2 by allies in the state and across the country, including the c.b.c. and i need to pause here to recognize my good friend, and a really strong voice for the people of alabama, congresswoman terri sewell. she's been spectacular, spectacular in this effort. although this victory was significant, it doesn't mark the end of the fight, but rather it marks a new chapter. because even after losing -- before this supreme court, before this conservative supreme court, republicans in alabama are doing everything that they can to avoid creating a map with two opportunity districts for black voters. now, asked if it was ok for alabama to disobey, to disobey federal court orders, one alabama con

it was that legal crusade that led to her appointment to the united states supreme court.justice ginsburg through the world of opera. everyone please give a big welcome tonight. [applause] >> i am thrilled to participate in this celebration because of my long-standing connection with justice ginsburg as a fellow opera lover. i first met her many years ago through another opera fan. we were at a movie theater to watch the saturday matinee performance of the new york metropolitan opera which was being transmitted live via satellite. it soon became a regular occurrence and we saw quite a few of them over the years. as you might imagine it was quite an experience attending these performances with justice ginsburg. at times there was a standing ovation when she entered the auditorium and a crowd of admirers that could easily overwhelm her they were left unchecked by security. justice ginsburg would gently wave her arms to motion everyone to sit down. but it could take a minute or two before people could calm down. people think taylor swift is a rock star. i quickly discovered i

this conversation, but we no longer have the legal protections or the support of the, of the united states supreme court and helping us to send off attacks like this. and so it's going to be up to those of us who are, who are concerned about person nationalism who don't want to see this is a religious state of who care about religious freedom for all people to stand up in huge at those foundational ideals. but what i think the 3 of you for an amazing conversation, are you right? that is our show up front will be back next week the the hiring sensation in women, sleepily italian trails lazy pilot a go new stands up to racism. and though to challenge her identity and would allow anyone that doesn't know how it is to wake up every day and fight for something you're truly believed to think that during the away from me or the strongest land, no matter what comes to you, you take it and you get out and you can keep going because it wants to be the best generation, thoughts on how to 0. the alternation and marks connected with one of the world's worst humanitarian crises. we don't accept any getting migr

this conversation, but we no longer have the legal protections or the support of the, of the united states supreme court and helping us to send off attacks like this. and so it's going to be up to those of us who are, who are concerned about person nationalism who don't want to see this is a religious state of who care about religious freedom for all people to stand up and hear to those foundational ideals. but what i think the 3 of you for an amazing conversation are you all right, that is our show upfront. we'll be back next week the the the pump table on algae 0, trying to host the asian games with our students from across the region competing and celebrating sports. rigorous debate, unflinching questions up front. come through the headlines to challenge conventional wisdom. u. k. prime minister. assume that it's expected to address these 1st party conferences leader with a general election looming and a waiver of strikes, the house, the broke house premier of a new series, exploring the implications of us and to boy, the 1st amendment, right, which is in liberia, to the post kind of incumbent

this conversation, but we no longer have the legal protections or the support of the, of the united states supreme court and helping us to send off attacks like this. and so it's going to be up to those of us who, who are concerned about christian nationalism who don't want to see this is a religious state of who care about religious freedom for all people to stand up in huge at those foundational ideals. but what i think the 3 of you for an amazing conversation, are you right? that is our show up front will be back. next week the, the the in depth analysis of the day, you say like, 1000000000 euros to help to address migration. is it going to ease the micro prices to make it worse? informed opinions, we need more investors and more people that make key decisions to embrace human foothold. frank assessments this balance between to toe and sound reassuring is potentially important for the volume. missing the station inside, stored on al jazeera, thought provoking on. but the patient doesn't have time to wait for the extremely unfortunate script. there are no quick wins and events or research hard h

that is my point based on the united states supreme court case. i don't understand. christiana: i don't think colorado has yet learned its lesson so it may take a couple shots from the supreme court. you are right that his case won in 2018. it was on the basis that colorado had shown such a religious hostility towards him. the state government officials. now, the way the next two cases began were an attorney who was very targeted and trying to lure jack into more litigation. the state of colorado continues to express impermissible hostility toward him. it is not as overt. they are getting smarter in how this is proceeding, but i think the 303 creative is the clear victory on the grounds of free speech and will be so valuable to creative professionals moving forward. >> thank you. >> madison, young american federation. i have two questions. i need the counselor case, do you know if anyone has been prosecuted under that law? christiana: i do not think i know for sure. i am not deep enough in the weeds to have a good answer for that. >> my other question is about the fir

supreme court help ex-people's deputy sheppelev avoid punishment? savchenko's law, which should not have been applied, was applied. but why does the united statesll an indicator of the huge problems that exist in the supreme court. congratulations, judicial control is on the air. since 2014, ukraine has quite successfully, although not quickly, passed a difficult exam on compliance with european standards, the renewal of the supreme court, the creation of a public integrity council, the launch of the anti-corruption court and the introduction of transparent tenders can be considered successful initiatives, but this was not enough to solve the chronic problems of ukrainian justice. rebooting the system now requires... radical measures, especially against the background of high-profile corruption scandals, which regularly involve themis officials at all levels. after the largest bribe in the history of ukraine received by the judges of the supreme court, the united states government requires us to review this body. our european ones directly depend on its results prospects, and judges of the highest instance continue to make ambiguous decisions.

ultimately go to the supreme court, that's the ultimate arbiter of what the constitution says, if you have conflicting rules by judges in different states, it would have to be decided by the uniteds supreme court. >> i know you don't find yourself agreeing with bill barr often, i suspect, but we did just listen to what he had to say. i wonder what you make of his comments about trump's pledges for retribution and the chaos it could cause, what scares you most about what he could do if he were in a position of naming a new attorney general, overseeing a department of justice? >> attorney general barr has it right there. this is one of the few instances what i would agree, i'd ask him, you knew this about this guy before you decided to be his attorney general. yeah, i'm concerned about what he can do between now and the election and if he were to win the election i'm concerned about what he would do to the rule of law, our system of justice, to the united states department of justice that is near indira to me. there is nothing i would put beyond what donald trump would do in order to save himself, in order to ensure that his interests are protected in those that are's supporters a

also ahead for us, it's day one of a new term at the united states supreme court.om is the ethics or lack thereof of some of the justices. many months now of drip, drip, drip revelations have left the court badly diminished in the public's view with no known plans to restore their own reputation. we'll get to that story later in the hour. "deadline: white house" continues after a quick break. don't go anywhere. ntinues after. don't go anywhere. (pensive music) (birds tweeting) (pensive music) (broom sweeping) - [narrator] one in five children worldwide are faced with the reality of living without food. no family dinners, no special treats, no full bellies. all around the world, parents are struggling to feed their children. toddlers are suffering from acute malnutrition, which stunts their growth. kids are forced to drop out of school so they can help support their families. covid, conflict, inflation and climate have ignited the worst famine in our lifetime. and we're fed up. fed up with the fact that hunger robs children of their childhood. fed up with the lack o

the senate judiciary committee is moving ahead today in its ethics investigation into the united states supremeove to vote to subpoena the billionaire benefactors of justices thomas and alito. the committee's chairman will be our next guest. don't go anywhere. s chairman wie our next guest don't go anywhere. (♪♪) (♪♪) (♪♪) (♪♪) i suffer with psoriatic arthritis and psoriasis. i was on a journey for a really long time to find some relief. cosentyx works for me. cosentyx helps real people get real relief from the symptoms of psoriatic arthritis or psoriasis. serious allergic reactions, severe skin reactions that look like eczema, and an increased risk of infections, some fatal, have occurred. tell your doctor if you have an infection or symptoms, had a vaccine or plan to or if ibd symptoms develop or worsen. i move so much better because of cosentyx. ask your rheumatologist about cosentyx. >>> the senate judiciary committee has announced that it will be voting on subpoenas in an effort to get to the bottom of the ethical rot that has embroiled the nation's highest court after repeated scandals in

unconstitutional, where his reasoning and language would be adopted three years later by the united states supreme court in its unanimous decision in brown versus board of education. washington insiders predicted that truman's executive order, the military and his public support for civil rights would result in his resounding defeat. but harry truman had been underestimated. his entire political, and he set off an exhausting cross-country tour known as a whistle stop campaign drawing massive crowds in towns that had never seen an american president. despite the advice of his campaign advisers. truman refused to back down on his civil rights program. on november two, 1948, president truman won what was then the greatest political upset in american history. in his second term, truman fully embraced the complete desegregation of america's armed forces. he appointed a committee to implement his executive order, which was resolutely committed to ending segregation in the military. when the army brass resisted the committee's insensitive insistence, they desegregate aspects of military life. truman stea

they're going to uphold it, and he is going to be going to jail with the full weight of the united states supremecourt, the conservative united states supreme court, saying he belongs in jail for a week. >> i'm not arguing with any of that. i'm saying the process is not prepared to deal with the outcome from that. >> of actually sending him. >> actually sending him to jail. that is the hesitation in this system right now. it is not prepared to pull the trigger you described, and i don't care what judge is sitting behind what bench. they're going to sit there and think long and hard about what you just described happening or doing. >> well -- >> and that's the problem with the system. >> and we just gave them a pathway, katty. >> i had a conversation with somebody from the trump campaign saying, look, they won't stop us talking because all our supporters are going to talk. we'll set up a nonprofit. we'll have a nonprofit do it, who is not donald trump will tweet out the things we want to get out anyway. we'll get around it that way. >> that's fine. it's not donald trump doing it. >> yes. in the en

the supreme court of the united states, the highest court in the land does not have an enforceable codeconduct. unlike employees of the executive and legislative branches, virtually all of them, unlike all members of congress and all federal justices, the nine supreme court justices decide what is and is not appropriate. more than 11 years ago i asked chief justice roberts to conduct a code of conduct for supreme court justices, i repeated that request repeatedly this year including last month when i sat next to the chief justice and spoke at the judicial conference. some have called for an ethics code. i believe a majority of the justices on the supreme court are embarrassed by these disclosures and want this to come to an end. the chief justice roberts and the court have failed to do anything. in pt face of the supreme court failure, the judiciary committee has exercised its right and duty to investigate this ethical crisis in order to craft and advance legislation to address it. beginning in may, the committee has sent letters to mawm of this these billionaires activists and organiza

when they said that's so vicious, but that kept us safe and passed in the united states supreme court sued me but on entry from terror plagued countries and halted and want to bring in the same people that are shooting rockets at israel and want to come into the united states. i don't think a lot of good things that will happen and i will have screening of immigrants, if you hate america and abolish israel and don't like our religion, if you sympathesize with jihadists, then we don't want you in our country and not getting in. we don't want you. get out of here. you're fired. unbelievely ron and his campaign which is dying like a falling bird from the sky, did you ever see a campaign as bad as this one. you need some personality here. he can be a politician but you have to have personality to go along with it. i got him elected. that guy was so dead, i said ron -- george washington coming back from the dead couldn't save you. he said if you endorse me i'll win. i said maybe lincoln and washington could help. but i gave it a shot. i didn't even know him well but one of the 150 congress

supremacy of the united states that supposedly ensures peace on earth, that is, he advocated the preservation of a unipolar world, for several for decades , the united states has reigned supremeis unipolar world; today we discussed what all this means with philosopher alexander dugin. alexandrelich, hello, thank you for they certainly found time for us, a versatile person, and wrote many books about various interesting things, i would like to ask a narrower question, probably, although it is global in nature, i mean the question of the new world order that various world orders are now trying to build political forces, well, our president has been raising this topic since the seventh year, but probably from the munich speech... recently this week the american president answered our president, he also talked about building a new world order, this is actually a quote, i would i wanted to ask you why this debate, so to speak, has intensified now , we are really in a turning point situation, in a situation where two world orders collide with each other, one world order, this is a unipolar world order, the world order that emerged after the end of the soviet union, when the west ha

when they said that's so vicious, but that kept us safe and passed in the united states supreme court sued me but on entry from terror plagued countries and halted and want to bring in the same people that are shooting rockets at israel and want to come into the united states. i don't think a lot of good things that will happen and i will have screening of immigrants, if you hate america and abolish israel and don't like our religion, if you sympathesize with jihadists, then we don't want you in our country and not getting in. we don't want you. get out of here. you're fired. unbelievely ron and his campaign which is dying like a falling bird from the sky, did you ever see they sanctimonious's campaign is falling like a bird from the sky, ever seen a campaign a is as bad as his? you need some personality, need to be a politician but got to have a little personality to go with it, he's dying. i also got him elected and he forgot about it. he was so dead i said nobody, george washington coming back from the dead couldn't save you. he said you are very popular in florida. if you endorse