and we both ended up in the united states supreme court one woman they expired was a young attorney in manhattan. she been working in the da's office. 1980, one when she heard the president reagan had nominated saturday o'connor, just two years earlier, she and her law school classmate, some wondered aloud, whether they would ever see a woman, on the supreme court in their lifetimes. little did sonia imagine. the 20 years later. she would become the third woman on the court. and make history in her own right, as the first latino justice. these three women come from very different backgrounds. one grew up shooting jack roberts on a ranch in arizona one is the descended of jewish immigrants one visit summer's visit your parents in puerto rico, they followed three separate paths to the american dream, but ended up in the same place, as accomplished, lawyers courageous trail blazers inspiring role models, in associates justices of the supreme court, we are deeply grateful for to them for all the day of down, and all they represent, joining justices ginsburg, on stage this, evening is reaga

maybe the first real departure of the united states supreme court, from the constitution, as it was originally written, was dred scott, internet scott the supreme court of the united states held the white persons, had the right to own black persons, in the territories of the united states. and they said that right could be found in the fifth amendments to process cause. which guarantees you, due process, before your life liberty. nascar the fifth amendment as long as he want, it's not there. dred scott made it up, the judges who did that, thought they were doing so for a good reason, something more important, they thought they were helping overt a civil war. and that making it up was worthwhile. they acted as legislators. judges make rotten politicians. they guessed wrong. and instead of overdoing the civil war, they helped contribute to it. that's one. angle separation of powers. what happens when, the legislature gives up its power to make the laws, and signs it instead, to the executive branch? >> madison knew that legislation, lawmaking, would be the greatest potential threat to liberty. a

will be available on more devices in them very dear future coming up the united states supreme court is taking on the separation of church and state and so are we with the leash across in the bar to stay tuned to watching. during the great depression which old mr remember there was most of my family were employed. there wasn't it was bed you know much worse objective listen today but there was an expectation that things were going to get better. there was a real sense of hopefulness there isn't today today's america was shaped by the turn principles of concentration of wealth and power. reduced democracy attacks a loadout engineer elections manufacture consent and other principles according to no i'm chomsky one set of rules for the rich opposite. that's what happens when you put her into the hands of a narrow sector of will switch will is dedicated to increasing power for itself just as you'd expect one of the most influential intellectuals of our time speaks about the modern civilization of america. is you'll be via reflection of reality. in a world transformed. what will make you f

will be available on more devices in them very dear future coming up the united states supreme court is taking on the separation of church and state and so are we with mr cross and ed martin stay tuned to watch and. sewing becomes a passer mechanism right so they buy back their own stock with cheap money from the fed and it goes through the company ostensibly to help the company but it's not it's it's disenfranchising the company and then on the other side the executives who are getting that money from the fed directly into their pocket they use the company as a pastor mechanism so what happens is it leads to incredible malinvestment so boeing that was longer a viable company. during the greed to prefer. to remember that it was most of the family were working. there wasn't it was you know much worse objectively. but there was an expectation of the things were going to get better. there was a real sense of hope. there isn't today 2 days america where shape by the 10 principles of concentration of wealth and power. reduced democracy attacks. engineer elections manufacture consent and ot

will be available on more devices in them very dear future coming up the united states supreme court is taking on the separation of church and state and so are we with the leash across the net martin stay tuned to watch and. i actually don't think monopolies per se are the problem it's monopolistic access the monopolies have to credit or to politicians and probably both the crony financial ism crony capitalism that's the big problem that's. from donald trump in 2016 to tell c gobert in 2020 there is part of the electorate that responds to anti-war anti interventionist rhetoric in fact there is evidence this significantly helped get trump elected but the fact remains the establishment is to downplay and even demonize any candidate who questions orthodoxies why is this. one of the greatest ongoing debate since the inception of the united states of america has been over the separation of church and state now the 1st amendment of the us constitution states some would argue rather clearly that congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exerc

bailable on more devices in them very dear future coming up the united states supreme court is taking on the separation of church and state and so are we with the misha cross and ed martin stay tuned for watching. my uncle the kid same company stable boy tonight nobody. people know who bought it because. it's not. going to. move on the us i didn't get showed up to move this because of almost anything going to be out in show. and we must. as i said it is not so much because i was it is a constant you must say i'm ideas. i . actually don't think monopolies per se are the problem it's monopolistic access to credit or to politicians and public but with the crony financial ism crony capitalism that's the big problem. thinking of getting abused coming once we got in here she. has been ill and still trapped in this tiny little wired you don't need a crate with him he will just start reaching out he will when it's raining anywhere near thousands of breeding dogs a caged in in human conditions on poppy crops i mean 67 years you know they've been locked up in a cage outside you see no protectio

all, we have the absolute right person presiding right n now, the chief justice of the united states supreme court. who better? when is the better time? now is the time. let's have the full documents. thank you. >> thank you. here's what i think we saw today. after three days of the house managers, i'm thoroughly and compellingly laying out the data and evidence around the tube charges against the president, obstruction and abuse of power. we saw today very much what manager schiff predictive liquid say, facts or information that more muddied the waters laid out anything in particular, tax on managers and the whistleblower. whatever that means. the most important thing i came away with from today, unlike senator duckworth, i never served on a jury before. this is my very first jury service. it never occurred to me that on my first jury service, i would be involved in a trial, where there is no cross examine of the witnesses. there is no documents and evidence we are able to see brought forth. i agree with senator schumer, that was the primary points i felt was me today by the presidents counsel. w

well it's quite questionable in a famous case called snap versus the united states the united states supreme court held that if publication went forward without the security review that the united states government could recover all the profits but in that case the book itself was published there is a very very strong presumption against what's called prior restraint trying to prevent publication of a book or a speech before it's disseminated to the public after the fact is a different matter where they want to punish somebody but here as well there is a unique element to the likelihood that mr mr bolton will be called as a witness remember mitch mcconnell and the majority leader of the senate said yesterday he doesn't have the votes to prevent additional witnesses and mr bolton would be number one on that list that even the republicans as well as democrats would want and i do not think that there would be any legal foundation for a court to tell a witness to refrain from testifying before a senate impeachment trial the united states supreme court has made it clear the processes by which impeachme

in washington — the chiefjustice of the united states supreme court is being sworn in for the impeachmentf donald trump. beyond 100 days brings you the latest on that at seven. after sir david attenborough calls for world leaders to act now and tackle climate change — we'll be discussing the impact fast fashion has on the environment. and at 10:40 and 11:30 this evening our guestsjoining me for tonight's papers are sam lister, deputy political editor at the daily express and the economist and member of labour's policy forum, grace blakeley. that's all ahead on bbc news. now on bbc news it's time for sportsday. hello, and welcome to sportsday. i'm chetan pathak. coming up on the programme... good repair work from ben stokes and ollie pope gives england the edge on day one of the third test in south africa. a ban on children in scotland heading football's during training could be in place in a matter of weeks. 15—year—old coco gauff will face venus williams at a grand slam again, as organisers of the australian open say the tournament will start on time despite concerns about air quality in

now, after that occurs, about two hours later, 2:00 p.m., the chief justice of the united states supreme court, john roberts, will make his way over to the united states and be sworn in to oversee the impeachment trial. once he is sworn in, anderson, he will then proceed to swear in all 100 senators for the duration of the trial. now, what we're seeing, basically, both today and tomorrow is kind of equal parts ceremonial and procedural. what happens next, likely on tuesday, will really be the kind of meat and bones of this senate trial. we are going to see presentations from those seven managers, 24 hours in total over the course of a couple of days. then the president's defense team will get their turn, also 24 hours. and then 16 hours, again, spread over several days, for any senator that wants to ask a question of either of those teams. that is the first part of the senate trial that is really locked in. it is after that that the big questions remain about how long this trial will go, will anybody testify. but that's what's locked in at the moment. and obviously, a lot of ceremony on this f

if they watch a trial in the united states senate presided over by the chief justice of the united states supreme court, a trial regarding the behavior of the most powerful person in this country and they come to believe there is a different standard for rich and powerful person, a rich and powerful person gets to hide all the evidence, hide all the witnesses, not be held accountable for the actual facts and evidence, it will confirm in many many people the deep cynicism and anxiety they have about our system of justice. let's stand for the proposition that we can still do justice in this country and reject an effort to turn this solemn proceeding to a sham. >> i think my colleagues for their eloquent statements. >> i remember joe manchin, hunter biden would be relevant witness. >> our goal, we want witnesses, documents in the room where it happened, to quote the hamilton play and bolton's book. witnesses we have suggested, i witnessed what happened, documents, eyewitnesses. hunter biden is irrelevant and a distraction. besides that it is not up to joe manchin or any of us, republicans could call hunte

huddled masses i don't think so this new seed change in how the united states handles its immigration was coded by the united states supreme court on monday in a highly controversial decision to override a lower court injunctions against the white house broadening of what's called the public charge rule the new york times reports that the supreme court's decision now finally allows the trumpet ministration to move forward with plans to deny green cards to immigrants who are thought to be likely to make even occasional and minor use of public benefits like medicaid food stamps and housing vouchers you see originally the public charge rule allowed officials to deny green cards to immigrants who could end up on public assistance but it was narrow in its focus and only enforced around one percent of the time but back in august yes back in august the trump. trumpeted at the times reports that the trump ministration broadened the criteria to include non-cash benefits providing for basic needs such as housing or food used in any.

believing -- and i have to say feeling comfortable lying with the chief justice of the united states supreme court right behind you shows the utter shamelessness of all of these people who work for donald trump. but think about the contrast that we've seen during impeachment and how it will actually make a difference for independents and swing voters in the 2020 election as they look at the incompetence and the lack of character of donald trump supporters on capitol hill and in that senate chamber yesterday. whether you are talking about the lawyers or white house aides or people like devin nunes, again, lying about being part of this conspiracy, making phone calls with this conspirator, versus the public servants that we've seen through this process like ambassador taylor, ambassador yovanovitch. there is such a marked contrast between the shamelessness of trump supporters and the honesty and the integrity of a lot of ambassadors who testified and some of the people who spoke yesterday on the senate floor, just laying out the facts that could not be debated, but could only be lied away by the pre

if you watch a trial and the united states senate, presided over by the chief justice of the united states supreme court, a trial regarding the behavior of the most powerful person in this country, and they come to believe, oh, there's a different standard for rich and powerful person, in which an alpha person gets to hide all the evidence, hide all the witnesses could not be held accountable for the artists facts and evidence. it will confirm in many, many people the deep cynicism and anxiety they have about our system of justice. let's stand for the proposition that we can still do justice in this country and let's reject an effort to turn this solemn precedent into a sham. >> thank you for my colleagues for the eloquent statements. >> i remember joe manchin said hunter biden would be a relevant witness. what you say to senator manchin? >> look, our goal, we want witnesses, documents in the room where it happened. to quote the hamilton played and actually bolton's book. what witnesses with suggested our eyewitness to what happened. a document our eyewitness. hunter biden is irrelevant and a distractio

they will be signed by the chief justice of the united states supreme court. those who are subject to those of peanuts -- subpoenas architected to fly. mister bolton announced he testified the senate issue, he's not in the executive branch so executive privilege cannot be used against him because it can't be used to present a witness who is willing to testify. even if witnesses don't comply with the subpoena and those who work for the president or not despite the bravery of people like hill and taylor, they will be given prompt judicial review given the urgency and stakes of an impeachment trial. there's a simple answer. when a republican friends claim it will take too long and they want a fair trial, they will tell the president not to invoke executive privilege. he is the one delayed, not us. if this is a serious as it should be, they will go to the president and say we don't want executive privilege invoked. the president believes he did nothing wrong and everything is perfect, he should have nothing to fear from these witnesses and documents. they are his

let's make the united states supreme court follow basic rules of ethics.okay, i could do these all night long. i really could, it's just like plan your greatest hits here. i'm going to do just one more. do you really want to hose out some of the corruption in washington make every single person who runs for federal office but their tax returns online. [applause] yep. okay, so that's part one. attack. >> taking live to richmond virginia. democratic governor ralph north rome is to give estate of a common wealth address of the capital part you can watch the rest of senator warm on c-span.warm just type born of the search box. your watching live coverage here on cspan2. [applause] [background noises] [backgun

members of the ited states senate who are sitting as a jury, and on my shoulder to myef the united states supreme court, will you have the chief jusesce, over and e over the trial, it all depends on what the house managers bring to the table. can they convince enough republicans that perhaps there is evidence, perhaps there are facts thathould indicate that perhaps additional witnesses should be called, additional documentation should be produced, that would give them pauseo think maybe we shouldn't just lock stop saying we are not goingpeo vote to h the president or convict fe president, maybe we need to hear morets? yes, i do believe there was a if i were a member of the united states senate tonight to what this trial and what fact might unfold in the days toe, cnd they are coming quickly. laura: ron christie, thank you. just a reminder of where we ar tonight. what is hapwaning here in ington is the articles of impeachment against president trump has been transmitted from the house of representatives to the senate, andeshe trial of ent trump will begin in earnest next tuesday. i would like to thank r

witnesses, whether they want to see any additional evidence stopping the chiefjustice of the united states supreme courtsiding officer but it will also be very different because unlike the house, where each one of the members of the committee got to stand up on their soap box and grandstand and give a five—minute speech to begin with, or senators have to remain silent, which is very difficult for a politician and if they want to ask a politician and if they want to ask a question, then they have to submit it in writing to the chiefjustice who they will ask the question of either the house managers or the president's defence team. it is a huge story and something about it tells me that we're going to be speaking it a little more. for now, thank you so much indeed. four teachers in los angeles are suing the us carrier, delta air lines, for negligence after a pilot dumped fuel over their primary school playground earlier this week. the teachers say the fuel burned their skin, eyes and throats and sent children screaming for cover. gareth barlow reports: this is the moment thousands of litres of aviation fu

huddled masses i don't think so this new seed change in how the united states handles its immigration was coded by the united states supreme court on monday in a highly controversial decision to override a lower court injunctions against the white house broadening of what's called the public charge rule the new york times reports that the supreme court's decision now finally allows the trumpet ministration to move forward with plans to deny green cards to immigrants who are thought to be likely to make even occasional and minor use of public benefits like medicaid food stamps and housing vouchers.

the chief justice of the united states supreme court will act as the presiding officer but it will also house where each one of the members of the committee got to stand up on their soap box and grandstand and give a five—minute speech to begin with, all senators here have to remain silent, which is very difficult for a politician and if they want to ask a question, then they have to submit it in writing to the chiefjustice, who they will ask the question of either the house managers or the president's defence team. let's get some of the day's other news. security forces in the chilean capital santiago have used tear gas against protesters. there have been months of demonstrations against the government of president sebastian pinera, with people demanding social reforms and changes to the constitution. dozens have died since the movement began in october. brazil's culture minister roberto alvim has been sacked after using parts of a speech by nazi germany's propaganda chief joseph goebbels in a video, sparking outrage. music by hitler's favourite composer richard wagner was played in th

this new seed change in how the united states handles its immigration was codify by the united states supreme court on monday in a highly controversial decision to override a lower court injunctions against the white house broadening of what's called the public charge rule the new york times reports that the supreme court's decision now finally allows the trump administration to move forward with plans to deny green cards to immigrants who are thought to be likely to make even occasional and minor use of public benefits like medicaid food stamps and housing vouchers you see originally the public charge rule allowed officials to deny green cards to immigrants who could end up on public assistance but it was narrow in its focus and only in forced around one percent of the time but back in august yes back in august the trump. the trump admit the times reports that the trump administration broadened the criteria to include non-cash benefits providing for basic needs such as housing your food used in any 12 months in a 36 month period as well as other bureaucratic jabs of poor immigrants like if you use

and applause] you mayren: here's one never have thought about, but it matters, make the united states supreme courtlow basic rules of ethics. [cheers and applause] ok, i could do these all night long. let me do just one more. it's ok, good. let me do just one more. someeally want to hose out of the corruption and washington, make every single person who runs for federal office, everyone file their tax returns online. [cheers and applause] sen. warren: so here is the thing. up against the most corrupt administration in american history. that is what it is. that means it is our moment to fight back. fight because, understand this, we push back against the influence of money in washington. we break it up, now we've got a chance. now we've got a chance to make this democracy work for everyone else. that is how it is. we can actually address climate change and make real change. how we can address gun violence and make real change. how we can cancel student loan debt and how we can make this a country that works for everyone. that is why i am in this fight. [applause] yeah.arren: all right. let's do some

are up for rights grabs this year in the united states supreme court. nation.aid for our they are afraid for our planet. and the danger is real. our democracy hangs in the balance. you got a decision to make, iowa. e got a decision to make as americans. are we going to give into the fear, are we going to be timid, to fight back? me, i'm in this because i'm fighting back. i'm fighting back. an act of ck is patriotism! [cheers and applause] we fought back against a king to nation.is we fought back against slavery this union. we fought back against a great depression to rebuild this economy. and we fought back against fascism to protect our democracy. we are at our best when we meet head on and when we back. this is no time for small ideas. his is no time to look backwards. this is no time for a vague nibbles around the edges of the big problems this faces. this is no time to think small. fights.we get in matters. that little consumer agency i told you about that president signed into law, it has already forced the banks to billion re than $12 cheated.to people th

i think that would the fog of dispute actually goes to the united states supreme court, they're goingo roll that it why not withstand arbitration. they will order arbitration. the u.s. supreme court ever rules on it but i do want to emphasize one source of agreement that chris and i have created you talk a lot about it in the book. we do have way is it too many laws on our companies. way is it too many legal constraints are coming. way beyond. would beyond contract pride and price-fixing progress in the book, is i agree, we are over regulating. and all advocate for business. i say rather than class action waivers which are a very blunt instrument, you can insulate yourself from liability or wrongdoing in any kind of case in the class action waiver. rather than allow this blunt instrument, why don't we focus on the laws we don't like. and say you can't use class action in those situations but allow the class action unless we do like. fraud, breach of contract and price fixing. advocate in the book that we should reach this principle the roles of principal procedures transit substantive

today's the anniversary of the united states supreme court's decision in roe against wade. ladies and gentlemen, the right to life is the most precious of rights and the most from child. we must never let it be taken for granted. a proviso preventing the funneling of taxpayer to planned parenthood and you are now considering two important pieces of legislation, both will protect the sanctity of life through the heartbeat or personhood. we will immediately sign them into law. [ applause ] thank you. and you know we face recruitment and retention challenges not only with teachers, troopers, soldiers and guards, but also with the valuable talent at our state agencies. our record low employment sometimes put low employment sometimes put agencies at a disadvantage against the private sector. governments should take some lessons from successful businesses. i'm convinced that across the board pay raises for state employees are less effective than those based on performance, merit, success, or experience. therefore, i ask that you provide $33 million, almost the equivalent of 2% ac

make the united states supreme court follow basic rules of ethics. okay. can do these all night long. let me do just one more. just one more. that's okay. good. let me do just one more. that is you really want to hose out some of the corruption in washington? make every single person who runs for federal office, every one, file their tax returns online. [cheers and applause] because here is the thing. we are up against the most corrupt administration in american history. that's what it is. and that means it is our moment to fight back. in this fight, understand this. we push back against the influence of money in washington. we just disrupt it. we get on our front foot. we break it up. now we got a chance. now we got a chance to make this democracy work for everyone else. that's how it is. that we can actually address climate change and make real change. how we can address gun violence and make real change. how we can cancel student loan debt. how we can make this a country that works for everyone and that's why i am in this fight. yeah. all right. let's d

lou: the united states supreme court handing president trump another major victory, allowing the administration that permits them to deny immigrants who use public assistance or welfare or might use it in the future to be barred from entry and status. the rule is being challenged in lower courts. injunction was put in place. that injunction is no more. justice neil gorsuch with a very important statement slapping down lower district court judges who try to supersede administration policies. the real problem he wrote is the common practice of courts trying to treans send the cases -- to transcend the cases before them. these orders direct how the defendant must act towards persons who are not parties to the case. china, the coronavirus, how worried should we be. stay with we made usaa insurance for members like martin. an air force veteran made of doing what's right, not what's easy. so when a hailstorm hit, usaa reached out before he could even inspect the damage. that's how you do it right. usaa insurance is made just the way martin's family needs it - with hassle-free claims, he got paid befo

lou: the united states supreme court handing president trump another major victory, allowing the administrationthe rule that permits them to deny immigrants who use public assistance or welfare or might use it in the future to be barred from entry and status. the rule is being challenged in lower courts. injunction was put in place. that injunction is no more. justice neil gorsuch with a very important statement slapping down lower district court judges who try to supersede administration policies. the real problem he wrote is the common practice of courts trying to treans send the cases -- to transcend the cases before them. these orders direct how the defendant must act towards persons who are not parties to the case. china, the coronavirus, how worried should we be. stay with ♪music ♪another summer day is come and gone away♪ ♪in paris and rome but i want to go home♪ ♪mmmmmmmm ♪maybe surrounded by a million people i♪ ♪still feel all alone i just want to go home♪ ♪oh i miss you, you know ♪let me go home ♪i've had my fun baby i'm done♪ ♪i gotta go home ♪it will all be alright ♪i'll be home toni

in which the united states supreme court unanimously said, yes, the federal government can put a tax carriages which is a way to tax rich people. rich people had carriages and poor people did not. the supreme court said yes, you can do this. and if you are an original in mind that, keep all nine of the supreme court justices at that point had all been part of the constitutional convention. so i think they knew what they were talking about so i feel good about this one. thank you. thank you. hello. , i'm ao, i'm katie senior in political science at iowa state. my question is -- what are your thoughts on voting rights for felons especially during the time they are still incarcerated? sen. warren: i think this is an important issue. i'm not there while they are still incarcerated but i am once they have served their time. my view is -- you get out of prison and you are expected to abide by the law and pay taxes and yourrt yourself family if you have a family. you have got to do all of the acts of citizenship. and that means you ought to have the right to vote. and so, i'm all in. i'm pu

we are going to a point justices of the united states supreme court who will up hold our laws and our constitution. >> he's going to build 400 miles completed at the end of the month. we will let you read the rest. here with the trump organization donald trump jr. i think keeping good politics is it. what do you think? >> it's hard to believe it's not the norm, sean. they talk about how horrible these things are. i will give chuck schumer the benefit of the doubt and say he knows nothing about trade. that's being generous. sitting in the senate for decades doing nothing to improve american jobs,s, doing nothing o stop ip theft. trump is going through the process, it's amazing as an american and a father of five. to see the promises kept. promises kept agenda for the first time. you see the nonsense from nancy pelosi today. it is very troubling to do this, but meanwhile she had to say seven times, this is impermane impermanent. it's permanent. that's all it is. it's just optics, sean. it's the only thing they have been able to do to trump while fighting for americans.o putting up unpre

the state rather than winner take all but that's down the road. >> pete, thank you, as always you make complicated things very easy to understand. pete williams outside the supreme court of the uniteding the attacks of service members in iraq and taking digs at president trump. what does it mean for the fragile state of tensions in the region? fidelity now has zero commissions for online u.s. equity trades and etfs. and fidelity also offers zero account fees for brokerage accounts, plus zero minimums to open an account. and only fidelity offers four zero expense ratio index funds directly to investors. with all of those zeros, there are zero reasons to invest anywhere else. fidelity. ♪ so maybe i'll win ♪ saved by zero ♪ so maybe i'll win ♪when you have nausea, heartburn, indigestion,♪ ♪upset stomach, diarrhea. try pepto liquicaps for fast relief and ultra-coating. ♪nausea, heartburn, indigestion, upset stomach, diarrhea.♪ get powerful relief with pepto bismol liquicaps. yeah. only pay for what you need with liberty mutual. only pay for what you need with liberty mutual. con liberty mutual solo pagas lo que necesitas. only pay for what you need... only pay for what you need. ♪ libe

lifted the rally notes, and read them in an impeachment trial with the chief justice of the united states supreme court right behind him. unbelievable. but you look at arguments made. alan dershowitz, if the president thinks it will help him get re-elected, think that's a pretty good thing, then it is constitutionally correct. dershowitz saying, i am the constitution. okay, whatever, spartacus. then i heard another argument walking through the house once again having a peanut butter and jelly sandwich and the argument was, we've already -- we've already given them 17 witnesses. >> right. >> like, what else do they want? well, that's like having a murder trial, and calling the pastry chef, and calling the dog trainer. we got the dog trainer. >> he didn't really see anything. >> he heard a gunshot but didn't see anything, and -- ah, the certified polisher of doorknobs, they get that from, you know, the door polishing -- >> willie, you have one. >> yeah. we all do. we all do. got the rug cleaner, dog trainer, partridge in a pear tree but the person who actually is the murder, actually holding the bloody m