that's where she will continue to stay and do as president of the united states. >> based on everything you saw last night, is there anything you would advise hillary clinton to change? >> i night. she had a chance to talk to the american people about what she plans to do as president of the united states. information for her plans. so i think she had a great night. i think we're going to continue to take that case to american people. both to her traveling across the country, making her case to folks. both through our organization like the one we have in florida that continues to register voters, particularly today, which is national voter registration day. registered to vote. you will see variety of ways we continue to talk to the american people. continue to make our case. if we continue to do has the she did last night she's going to be the next president. >> mr. marshall thank you for your time. >> thanks for having me. >>>coming up. see how trump and clinton matchup right now in florida and what and who they need to pull off a we are one nation under god. that black and white, we a

we will allow united states-based manufacturers to fully expense new plants and equipment. big, big deal. on top of that, we will bring back trillions in business wealth and this is wealth that parked overseas -- overseas. no one knows how much it is. some people think it is $2.5 trillion. i think it is more like $5 trillion. they will be able to bring it back at a rate of only 10% instead of 35%. and who would bring it back at 35%? obviously nobody, because nobody is doing it. i think it is going to be something that will be so phenomenal, far beyond what people even think he erred by taxing it at 10% instead of 35%, all of this money will come roaring back into our country and lots of good things will start to happen. we will turn america into a new magnet for new jobs and that means jobs in our poorest communities. so important. companiesnow, we have leaving the country because taxes are too high. but we actually have countries leaving -- companies leaving the country to get their money. and that's a first. nobody believes it, but that's happened. next, regulations. one

we will also allow united states-based manufacturers to fully expense the cost of new plants and equipment. big, big deal. [applause] on top of that, we will bring back trillions in business wealth and this is wealth that costs overseas, nobody knows how much it is. they say it's $2.5 trillion. i have people who think it's $5 trillion. we'll bring them back and it'll be taxed only at the rate of 10% instead of 35%. who would bring it back at 35%? obviously nobody because nobody is doing it. i think it's going to be something that will be so phenomenal, far beyond what people even think. by taxing it at 10% instead of 35%, all of this money will come roaring back into our country and lots of good things will start to happen. we will turn america into a new magnet with new jobs and that means jobs in our poorest communities. so important. and right now, we have companies leaving the country because taxes are too high, but we actually have companies leaving the country to get their money. that's a first. nobody has ever heard of that one before but believe me that's appened. next comes regula

we will also allow united states based manufacturers to fully expense the cost of new plants and equipment. big, big deal. on top of that, we will bring back trillions in business wealth and this is wealth that's parked overseas. nobody knows how much it is. they say it's $2.5 trillion. i have people who think it's $5 trillion. we'll bring them back and it will be taxed only at the rate of 10% instead of 35%. and who would bring it back at 35%? obviously nobody because nobody is doing it. i think it's going to be something that will be so phenomenal, far beyond what people even think. by taxes it at 10% instead of 35%, all of this money will come roaring back into our country and lots of good things will start to happen. we will turn america into a new magnet for jobs, and that means jobs in our poorest communities. so important. and right now we have companies leaving the kcountry because taxes are too high, but we actually have companies leaving the country to get their money. that's a first. that's happened. next comes regulations. one of the keys to unlocking growth is scaling back yea

united states? >> mr. trump has choeps en and rightly so. the american public isn't deciding the next president of the united states based on that question, butjobs, make america safe for their children and grandchildren. right now it looks like they're moving in the drrks of donald trump. as the polls are saying, they don't trust hillary clinton anymore. the other thing the polls are saying is 70% of america thinks it's time for change. donald trump represents change. hillary clinton certainly does not. >> one thing they're also saying, if you're talking about that, ron, to get you on this, when you look at who is voting for who, the parties are going to their party leaders. 90% of republicans are now supporting -- saying they're now going to support donald trump. republicans are coming home. are you joining them? >> well, you know, i'm in the vote your conscience camp right now. i want to see what donald trump is able to do going forward. i think he has an opportunity to reinvent himself if he chooses to take it. i think the most dramatic thing he can do to shake this race up would be to take some of the bizarre things he's said in the past

got to lose with some very dark pictures of what it means to be an african-american in the united states based on the time and lack of economic opportunity and tomorrow course he goes to detroit for what has been eight much typed african-american outreach with ben carson. he will go to the impact network which is the nation's only owned and operated african-american tv channel, evangelical christian tv where he will be interviewed by the bishop and he will address the congregation. ben carson will also give him a tour of the inner city of detroit, carson of course a former rival who is now a trump supporter and grew up in detroit so he is by far focusing more and more on minority outreach. latinos, hispanics as well as african-americans. that's the focus both today and tomorrow. leland: carl cameron outside trump towers. more on the security briefing as it becomes available, thanks carl. jenna: a florida judge ruled witnesses in the trial of the terror suspects can testify in disguise. 24-year-old harland florez was arrested last july in key west after telling an undercover fbi agent he wanted

we will also allow united states-based manufacturers to fully expense the cost of new plants and equipment. big, big deal. [applause] mr. trump: on top of that, we will bring back trillions of business wealth and this is wealth that costs overseas. nobody knows how much it is. $5ave people who think it is trillion. we will bring it back and it will be taxed only at the rate of 10%. who would bring it back at 35%? obviously, nobody because nobody is doing it. i think it will be something that is so phenomenal, far beyond what people even think. comef this money will roaring back into our country, and lots of good things will happen. jobs in our poorest communities, so important. we have companies leaving the to get their money. next comes regulations. one of the keys is scaling back legislation.strous turned into ave massive industry. it is one business that i will put to an end on day one. [applause] mr. trump: in 2015 alone, federal agencies issued over 3,300 final rules and regulations up from 2,400 the prior year. every year, overregulation costs our economy $2 trillion a year and reduc

hey, wait a second, if they're going off saudi arabia, we're next so we're going to sue the united states based on the same principles they are pursuing in this new relationship with the saudi arabians and with the new view of sovereign immunity. and that could be over drone strikes in pakistan, drone strikes in afghanistan. it's just a big unknown and that's what the obama administration has been saying. and you're already seeing in congress some people say, hey, maybe we need to revisit this and tie it up a little tighter. >> that's what i was going to say. after this election, there is, it appears they're going to come back together and look at this again. it's very much worth a read, if you're interested in this in any way, remember the attacks of 9 /11, understand our relationship with saudi arabia, would like to, google it. find a fair-minded website that you trust because of facts, not because of ideology, and read it. read it, learn about it, because it's coming back. thank you, gentlemen. >>> hillary clinton rolling out the big guns on the campaign trail just moments from now, she's se

we will also allow united states-based manufacturers to fully expense the cost of new plants and equipment. big, big deal. on top of that, we will bring back trillions in business wealth, and this is wealth that's parked overseas. nobody knows how much it is. they say it's 2.5 trillion. i have people that think it's $5 trillion. we'll bring them back and it will be taxed only at the rate of 10% instead of 35%. and who would bring it back at 35%? obviously, nobody, because nobody is doing it. i think it's going to be something that will be so phenomenal, far beyond what people even think. by taxing it at 10% instead of 35%, all of this money will come roaring back into our country and lots of good things will start to happen. we will turn america into a new magnet for new jobs. that means jobs in our poorest communities. so important. and right now we have companies leaving the country because taxes are too high, but we actually have companies leaving the country to get their money. and that's a first. nobody's ever heard of that one before, but believe me, that's happened. next come regula

we will also allow united states-based manufacturers to fully expense the cost of new plants and equipment. big, big deal. [applause] mr. trump: on top of that, we will bring back trillions of business wealth and this is wealth that costs overseas. nobody knows how much it is. they say it is $2.5 trillion. i have people who think it's $5 trillion. and bring them back and taxed at 10% and not 35%. who would bring it back at 35%? obvious nobody because nobody is doing it. i think it's going to be something that is so phenomenal, far beyond what people even thing think. by taxing at 10% instead of 35%, all of this money will come back into our country and lots of good things will start to happen. we will turn america into a new magnet with jobs and jobs in our poorest companies. so important. companies are leaving the country because taxes are so high and countries leaving the country to get their money. that's a first. no one has ever heard that before, but believe me, that's happened. next comes to regulation. need to scale back years of disastrous regulation unilaterally imposed by out of

"newsweek" this man if elected would be the most conflicted president in the history of the united states based on his tangled web of business dealings in countries all over the world including south korea, turkey, where we have national security interests and he's doing business there and says i'll let my kid run the company. that's not a blind trust. he needs to disinvest. most importantly, he needs to disclose. the man is a walking conflict of interest. he has said to the american people my returns are none of your business. when you are a walking conflict of interest, it is the american people's business. >> we will definitely talk more about that in just a second. >> happy to. >> since the convention in terms of non-fund raising stops, donald trump has had more events than hillary clinton. you just said she's traveled more. i don't believe that's true since the convention. >> throughout the campaign, look -- >> since the convention -- >> he may have. here's the reality. what we are doing is very strategic and using her time. we have a map right now in this election, you heard me say the cu

and threatens to strip all foreign governments from immunity from judicial processes of the united states based solely upon allegations by private litigants that a foreign government's overseas conduct has some role or connection to a group or person that carried out a terrorist attack inside the united states. this would invite consequential decisions to be made based upon incomplete information and risk having different courts reaching different conclusions about the culpability of individual foreign governments and their role in terrorist activities directed against the united states. which is neither an effective nor coordinated way for us to respond to indications that a foreign government might have been behind a terrorist attack. second, jasta would upset long-standing international principles regarding sovereign immunity, putting in place rules that if applied globally could have serious implications for u.s. national interests. the united states has a larger international presence by far than any other country, and sovereign immunity principles protect our nation and its armed forces,

united states. this would invite consequential decisions to be made based upon incomplete information and risk having different courts reaching different conclusions about the culpability of individual foreign governments and their role in terrorist activities directed against the united states. which is neither an effective nor coordinated way for us to respond to indications that a foreign government might have been behind a terrorist attack. second, jasta would upset long-standing international principles regarding sovereign immunity, putting in place rules that if applied globally could have serious implications for u.s. national interests. the united states has a larger international presence by far than any other country, and sovereign immunity principles protect our nation and its armed forces, officials and assistant professionals from foreign court proceedings. these principles also protect u.s. government assets from attempted seizure by private litigants abroad. removing sovereign immunity in u.s. courts from foreign governments that are not designated as state sponsors of terrorism based

and threatens to strip all foreign governments from immunity from judicial processes of the united states based solely upon allegations by private litigants that a foreign government's overseas conduct has some role or connection to a group or person that carried out a terrorist attack inside the united states. this would invite consequential decisions to be made based upon incomplete information and risk having different courts reaching different conclusions about the culpability of individual foreign governments and their role in terrorist activities directed against the united states. which is neither an effective nor coordinated way for us to respond to indications that a foreign government might have been behind a terrorist attack. second, jasta would upset long-standing international principles regarding sovereign immunity, putting in place rules that if applied globally could have serious implications for u.s. national interests. the united states has a larger international presence by far than any other country, and sovereign immunity principles protect our nation and its armed forces,

we will also allow united states-based manufacturers to fully expense the cost of new plants and equipmenton top of that, we will bring back trillions in business wealth and this is wealth that costs overseas, nobody knows how much it is. they say it's $2.5 trillion. i have people who think it's $5 trillion. we'll bring them back and it'll be taxed only at the rate of 10% instead of 35%. who would bring it back at 35%? obviously nobody because nobody is doing it. i think it's going to be something that will be so phenomenal, far beyond what people even think. by taxing it at 10% instead of 35%, all of this money will come roaring back into our country and lots of good things will start to happen. we will turn america into a new magnet with new jobs and that means jobs in our poorest communities. so important. and right now, we have companies leaving the country because taxes are too high, but we actually have companies leaving the country to get their money. that's a first. nobody has ever heard of that one before but believe me that's happened. next comes regulation. we have to scale back

but by design, we do not have a statute that says you can designate some group inside the united states based solely on being in the group and say it's illegal to be in the group or provide support to the group. instead it's based on conduct. that line i think makes a lot of sense, but it has caused the question, for instance, do you take as seriously if someone's motivated by a purely domestic political motivation but commits an act of violence? do you take that as seriously? and we do, but it's not always reflected in a statute that we can charge. so they maybe get charged somewhere else in the federal criminal code or locally. one question that i think's worth exploring is is there a change in the code that still reflects our values, so it says you committed some other crime, like violence, but says there's some additional penalty if the reason why you committed that act of violence is to change political behavior. that is defined already in the federal code book, but it's not a stand-alone statute. >> so, defining who and what a domestic terrorist is, is that potentially a slippery slope?

we will also allow united states-based manufacturers to fully expense the cost of new plants and equipment, big, big deal. [ applause [ applause ] on top of that, we will bring back trillions in business wealth and this is wealth that's parked overseas. nobody knows how much it is. they say it's $2.5 trillion. i have people that think it's $5 trillion. we'll bring them back and it will be taxed only at the rate of 10% instead of 35%. and who will bring it back at 35%? obviously nobody. nobody's doing that. i think it's going to be something that will be so phenomenal. far beyond what people even thi think. by taxing it at 10% instead of 35%, all of this money will come roaring back into our country and lots of good things will start to happen. we will turn america into a new magnet for jobs and that means jobs in our poorest communities, so important. and right now we have companies leaving the country because taxes are too high but we actually have companies leaving the country to get their money. and that's a first. nobody's ever heard of that one before but believe me that's happening.

what does the economy look like in the united states based on your brands? to raise rates just this week. we're thinking maybe december. but you've got information not only of what you're seeing now but what the bookings are out to that time? >> again, most of individual travelers book very shortly before they stay. so our long lead is about group. group is a somewhat different dynamic. i think it won't surprise you to know that we see the economy growing anemically in the united states. it's not our business is up year over year but not in a robust way. and we see corporate travelers, corporations particularly being somewhat cautious about their spending. not retrenching totally, but also saying, you know, we're not quite sure what the future holds. >> are security concerns affecting your bookings most in europe? can you trace it? >> the markets that have been hardest hit, brussels, france, and istanbul. >> you feel it? >> yeah. turkey the most significant today not surprisingly. you've got events not only in istanbul but a geopolitical situation which is v

the united states kills them wherever that may be the united states just murdered somebody based on secret evidence it will not acknowledge. but if you want to know the difference cutback is the profound dilemma instead of piling more and more into the war category and is much more convenient i don't have to give you the reason. >>host: one of the things that you write about of one thought this is up . airtime to close a chapter in the back to that war and peace dichotomy but your argument that it is not this isn't the gap between "war and peace" but it is an during. where do you think we go with this? dec of way we can get back to the old way if there ever was? orgy using we need to change how we think greg. >> we need to change how we think but the nearness of the vehicle categories was always overstated even during the last state on state world war ii when on the margins definitional problems people who ignore the laws of war. but what has happened in the seven decades since then, is the have gone from the situation of a lot of exceptions on the margins of what is overwhelming the norm

united states: war, unrest, and destabilization." and with adriana benjumea, director of the bogota-based human rights group humanas colombia. then, we return to the united states to look at debtors prisons in arkansas where a county has been jailing poor people who owe fees for writing bad checks. we'll speak with a woman who once wrote a check for $1.07 for a loaf of bread. the check bounced and her debt ballooned after fees and fines to nearly $400. we'll also speak with nikki -- were kristen clarke represents a mother who spent 35 days in a county jail after she accidentally bounced a 20 night check five years ago. then a federal judge has denied a request for life-saving hep c drug for mumia abu-jamal. he found penciling his protocol or who gets the drug in prison is unconstitutional. >> judge recognizes with the commonwealth is doing and has been doing for years is not only unjust, but not right. unconstitutional. a violation of phenomenal dish environmental fairness and the human right to life. amy: we will speak with mumia abu-jamal plus attorney bob boyle. all that and more, coming up. welcome to democracy now!, demo

we will also allow united sta s states-based manufacturers to fully expense the cost of new plants and equipment. big, big deal. [ applause ] on top of that, we will bring back trillions in business wealth and this is wealth that's parked overseas. nobody knows how much it is. they say it's $2.5 trillion. i have people that think it's $5 trillion. we'll bring them back and it will be taxed only at the rate of 10% instead of 35%. and who would bring it back at 35%? obviously nobody. because nobody's doing it. i think it's going to be something that will be so phenomenal. far beyond what people even think. by taxing it at 10% instead of 35%, all of this money will come roaring back into this country and lots of good things will start to happen. we will turn america into a new magnet for new jobs, and that means jobs in our poorest communities. so important. and right now we have companies leaving the country because taxes are too high. but we actually have companies leaving the country to get their money. and that's a first. nobody's ever heard of that one before. but believe me, that's

we would have to close twenty military bases in the united states immediately. that's the kind of defense program that mr. carter wants. let me tell you this straight from the shoulder. you don't negotiate with mr. brezhnev from weakness. and the kind of defense program that mr. carter wants will mean a weaker defense and a poor negotiating position. ms. frederick: mr. trewhitt, a question for president ford. mr. trewhitt: mr. president, my question really is the other side of the coin from mr. frankel's. for a generation the united states has had a foreign policy based on containment of communism. yet we have lost the first war in vietnam, we lost a shoving match in angola. the communists threatened to come to power by peaceful means in italy, and relations generally have cooled with the soviet union in the last few months. so let me ask you first, what do you do about such cases as italy? and secondly, does this general drift mean that we're moving back toward something like an old cold war relationship with the soviet union? mr. ford: i don't believe we shoul

senator from wisconsin, a great friend and someone whose passion has been brought to the united states senate. based on issues that -- where people are hurting, i just can't thank him enough for bringing to this body the kind of energy and the kind of passion that is directly related to the pain that people are suffering in this state, whether it's loss of a job, whether it's death of a child, whether it's something related to education, something related to everyday life, the things that happen in life. ron johnson, senator ron johnson has been on top of it. this is a perfect example of that kind of a passion that he is bringing. he refuses -- he refuses to say i can't go any further. he refuses to take and accept the minority leader's observes to this -- objection to this. and along with my colleague from wyoming and others, this bipartisan supported measure, how the minority leader can come down here and give the example of why every parent deserves the right to try, to try to save their children and to take advantage of medicines and procedures that might be that miracle cure and then say no, we

governor sam brownback served 14 years and united states senate prior to becoming the governor of kansas in 2011. this is based on his deep commitment to human rights. while in the senate he called on the united states to condemn the genocide in sudan failed darfur region. sponsoredrownback legislation in the senate to establish this museum. please join me in welcoming governor sam brownback. governor brownback: what a great honor to be with you, mr. president, mrs. obama, john lewis, or colleagues who are here. this is an immense location and i am delighted to be part of it. we have a sense of our state's history and destiny. we are one of the few states in the union that was formed for a cause. our cause was to in the barbaric practice of slavery. john brown was one of our most famous residents. the president was also a resonant kansas at one time. his cause was the undoing of the enormous crime of slavery. before he was executed for treason, he spoke these haunting and prescient words. brown, are now quite certain that the crimes of this guilty land will never be purged away but by blood. a great deal of bl

and an earlier one that occurred in 2009 at the largest and most important nuclear weapons based in the united state is the nuclear submarine base near seattle that has an estimated 1300 warheads. in that case, five activists all over the age of 60, including a catholic nun and priest in their 80s broke into the base and are able to get to at the nuclear weapons are stored. it turns out that incident or that action inspired mr. meek and to her action. >> that's kind of how it works. they make this heavy-handed point in the book. it's a chain reaction among people. they cause a reaction that far outpaced those the size of a non. you know, you could look at people the same way. individual actions. sister and montgomery who was enough action in washington state in 2009. sister mica announced for trial in tacoma, washing and said this is amazing. i have to do one of these myself. she went and did a couple years later. >> what is interesting is in both cases the activists in the trial in tacoma and in knoxville, they tried to raise the same defense and in both cases they were shut down. let's talk about

frankly destabilizing, dangerous, dangerous to the united states, dangerous to the world order, if you will. the united states foreign policy is basedn agreements, often long negotiated agreements. sometimes decades or longer in standing. and if you listen to the debate, he was basically saying he's a businessman, he's going to tear up those old agreements and negotiate better deals. if you're a foreign country and you're listening to this, and you're listening and you have an agreement with the united states regarding nato or a nuclear deal or a protection agreement or a sovereignty agreement or a trade agreement, and you suddenly think is the leading world power just going to tear up the agreement that we've had for decades? what is that going to mean for me? are my neighbors going to invade? there was one thing he talked about, establishing a protection racket around the world. he mentioned saudi arabia. let's take a listen. >> can you imagine, we're defending saudi arabia, and with all of the money they have, we're defending them, and they're not paying? all you have to do is speak to them. >> so this is like, kind of a mafia pr

. >> more people believed ted cruz was born in the united states than believe barak obama was born in the united states. part of it is the basethe other part is you are seeing donald trump at his peak self-confidence when he gets into the mode of saying he doesn't have to change fundamental things is because he feels right now that he is winning. so he is going back to the well, going back to things he thinks make him popular. for part of the base, these make him popular. he is giving hillary clinton an opening that she needs. hillary clinton right now needs to do two things. she needs to remind young voters and voters of color that you need to be afraid of a donald trump presidency. you need to be excited about voting against him. she's in the polls this week has learned she needs to create affirmative support for herself. tonight she did the affirmative part in her speech. you see they made sure they got in the birther thing. it's very helpful with african-americans. >> on that last point there, today one of the things that i was researching and looking at and try doing some sort of additional reporting on or getting some n

and as prime minister netanyahu mentioned, the bond between united states and israel is unbreakable. it is based on common values and family ties, a wrecknition that a jewish state of israel is one of our most important allies, and a guiding principle in my presidency. and one i expressed often to the prime minister, is that it is important for america's national security to ensure that we have a safe and secure israel. one that can defend itself. and so the understanding that we were signing is indicative of that. and provide an assurance and foundation for the kinds of ongoing military and intelligence cooperation that has been the hallmark of our relationship. it allows israelis the kind of certainty in a moment where there is enormous uncertainty in the region. it is a difficult and dangerous time in the middle east. we want to make sure that israel has the full capabilities that it needs in order to keep the israeli people safe. this will give us an opportunity to talk about the challenges that arise out of the situations like syria. i'll also be interested in hearing from the prime ministe

united states. report fromng to a the new york-based conference board in the united states . 104.1, beatingt expectationsghest level in nine years. i have the charter my bloomberg. still with us is patrick armstrong. this is what is meant to be happening, but it's the only bit of the u.s. economy that seems to still be functioning and delivery. it's a big chunk, and it is working right now. yet this morning i checked the policy of the fed rate hike in december, less than 50%. >> yeah. next timethe economy to the economy running hot. she said in the press conference that we want the economy to run hot before we start hiking. i don't know if she is referring to december, or a stream of hikes. it's unlikely we get to the point where it is hot by december. you can see why confidence numbers have improved. people feel safe in their jobs right now. that's really were confidence comes from. buying,.s. consumer is things are ok on the global economic front. guy: you point out earlier how nervous you are about the bond market, the treasury market. he also pointed out this chart he -- it's a minimum volatility bas

the problem with that is the majority of these apps are not based in the united states. they're foreign-based. so i'd say more than half of these apps, like telegram, what's app and telegram are their favorites. that they used in the paris and brussels attacks. but many of these apps are overseas-based and we have no jurisdiction over them. so we're entering into this digital age of security that's a huge challenge. i think you pointed that out very well. moderator: thank you very much for an important conversation. [applause] mr. mccaul: thank you. appreciate it. moderator: if i could ask everybody to remain seated for just one second while the congressman heads out and then we can all get up. [captioning performed by the national captioning institute, which is responsible for its caption content and accuracy. visit ncicap.org] [captions copyright national cable satellite corp. 2016] >> tonight the c.e.o. of wells fargo, john stumpf, testifying again on capitol hill about the sales practices of his company. which involved creating an estimated two million fraudulent acco

congovernment found the remains several years ago and will return them to the united states with full honors at dover air force base. further testing will determine their identity. >>> the monsoon ongoing. did you catch this yesterday? with just three days left, the dust storm you see there, a haboob rolling into the valley, engulfing the valley and swallowing up neighborhoods and making it hard to see just a few feet in front of you. we would love to see pictures and video that maybe you captured of this dust storm. make sure to send them our way, share@abc15.com. i showed you this time lapse earlier but when you look at the initial start, you can see a haze over the valley, the lingering dust in the air from last night's dust storm. see some of the dust is settled in. the showers are isolated in nature and a slight chance, a 10% chance of isolated showers here by 8:00 this morning. you may catch a stray shower as you are driving into pork work. and then a lull in the action and this afternoon, a 10% chance of a stray shower or a thunderstorm. overall, a less active day before better kick in tomorrow. 76 as you st

united states. olmstead and vox based their idea off of fauch avenue in paris. so if you're thinking of alfond and housman's work earlier. in this early conception of the parkway, they are thinking about a couple of rather simple ideas. first it is a wider than average street. it's wider. second, a parkway in the early conception were usually tree-lined. and we've talked a little bit about boulevards, and essentially, a parkway in the beginning was a wide street with trees, indistinguishable from the term boulevard. so they're pretty much identical. the most significant aspect or difference is the name which provided a sense of the utility of the parkway as linking a park to park. norman newton in your text says "the parkway provides the, quote, psychological carryover of the restful influence of one large park area into its echo in another with little or no interruption along the way. " ooms. right? so there is this idea of park. it is connected seamlessly with a parkway. parkways became to be a little bit more serious with the design of this system which is --

americans appear the dissemination ended with civil rights movement and the united states had to move beyond waste race-based systems of exploitation. alongside growth of of american law enforcement at the last 50 years, black metaclass surface and african-americans assumed power with greater visibility. these achievements promoted discourses of cultural pathology and personal responsibility even further. making it seem as though the systematic incarceration of entire groups of racially marginalized citizens reflected the natural order of things. political representation and the fact that some black americans have amassed substantial wealth and capital do not mean that historical racism and inequality has ended, which i'm sure is not news to many of you in this room today. african-americans grew more affluent after 1965, by the end of the 20th century the net financial assets of the highest black american households were $7448. only $448 above that of the lowest fifth white american households. the black middle class has always been concentrated in the public's fear and social services. mobility is tied to t

the united states just murdered somebody based on secret evidence that it's not willing to knowledge that's shocking. we want to know the difference between war and not war, but right now we have a legal framework that makes you choose and both choices look like bad choices. that's a farley profound dilemma we're in and what we have beenen doing is piling more and more into that war category because, frankly, it's convenient for the government. it's much more convenient to be able to say, i don't have to acknowledge this. i don't have to give you the reasons. trust me. it's always easier for the executive branch to say that. >> host: one thing you write about that is row lated to that if one thought this is a period of time' going to close a chapter, and we go back to a neat war/peace dichotomy, that would be one thing, but your argument is this is not ending, and in fact this state of not war, the gap in between war and peace, which we haven't come up with a good term for, it's enduring. can you talk about where you think we're going with this. do you see a way in which we can get b

the largest slave trading company in the united states at that time was based in two places, one along nach ez, mississippi was one end and the other was here in alexandria, virginia. >> the sal josse part of the slave wrecks project. what is the slave wrecks project? >> what we have is that we realize that the goal of this initially was to find iconic pieces of a slave ship. we didn't set out to find the sal josse, creating a new museum, you wanted people to understand by humanizing the slave trade. we spent a lot of time in cuba looking at ships and figuring out, this is where we begin to do our exploration. as we got close and wanted to make sure we found something, we began to work with the slave wrecks project, an amazing collaboration of scholars in the united states and south africa in brazil, people within the united states park service who want to realize that maritime arcology didn't look for ships of the enslaved. we wanted to work with partners to help us map the ocean floors and begin to identify where other ships could be. our goal is pretty sim. . on the one hand we want

the harm to the united states is extremely grave based on mrs. clinton's personal conduct.i impugning the good work judicial watch and you broken and uncovered a incredible amount of information, but how does this story move forward? every time we hear mrs. clinton having more classified information, her being less than truthful, someone from "judicial watch" comes on and says largely same things you're saying today. how does this narrative change or perhaps it doesn't? >> it will be interesting to compare the variety of things mrs. clinton said over the last year and what she will swear under oath to us in written interrogtoresries she must swear to. not even the fbi got her under oath. "judicial watch" will get her under oath. it will be interesting to look ahead the next few weeks or months to see what other documents are produced to see what whistle-blowers come forward to congress out of both the fbi and the state department. and then there is other kind of wildcard things, things like wikileaks, julian assange, who knows what he will publish. leland: right. >> i think

united states. it takes 22 years on average to field a major new weapons system. in 2010, the united states spent $554 billion on non-war based defense spending. in the year, and i have to say, currently we're spending $548 billion a cut of 10% and that number is going down very rapidly, looking into the future unless i become your president. [applause] this reduction was done through what is known as sequester which you all have heard about, automatic defense budget cuts. under the budget agreement the defense took half of the cuts even though it only makes up 1/6 of the budget. so they put it all in defense. as soon as i take office i will ask congress to fully eliminate the defense sequester and submit a new budget to rebuild our military. it is so depleted. we will rebuild our military. [applause] this will increase certainty in the defense community as to funding and will allow military leaders to plan for our future defense needs. and most importantly, we will be defended because without defense, we don't have a country. [applause] as part of removing the defense sequester i will ask congress to fully offset the cost of

the clerk: a bill to amend title 38, united states code, to provide for the removal or demotion of employees of the department of veterans affairs based on performance or misconduct, and for other -- a bill to amend chapter 3 of title 5, united states code, to require the publication of information relating to pending agency regulatory actions, for other purposes. the speaker pro tempore: the house will be in order. members, please take the conversations from the floor. he house will be in order. he house will be in order. for what purpose does the gentleman from michigan seek recognition? >> i have a motion to recommit at the desk. the speaker pro tempore: is the gentleman opposed to the bill? >> i am opposed. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman qualifies. the clerk will report the motion. the clerk: mr. kildee of michigan moves to recommit the bill h.r. 5226 to the committee on oversight and government reform with instructions to report the same back to the house forthwith with the following amendment -- page 5, after line 6, insert the following -- d, applicability. the restriction described in subsection c-4 shall not apply to