greatrcentages are not as here but even in the united tates what we are learning and cheryl sandburgrs,google the last 48 the way women are treated is but no w much subtler less damaging, not only for the individual woman but for the a whole.s that is a profound message i ope more people and institutions will help us make. applause] >> we will go from the public to more personal. is there still a double standard n the media about how we talk about women in public life? i want to ask specifically a lot of fun researching both of you and i that i oss a standard can't believe is true but you were meeting with a foreign night and flown all tied your layer back and when he he was o the room frightened because he heard when your hair was back you were unpleasant value. and if your hair is short you are going to devalue them? i have my hair a bit longer last october for the annual meeting. a story was written saying that theree my hair was longer .ould no longer be haircuts >> i guess that answers the question. that.p on !> really, tom there is a double standard obviously. either experience

are you advocating social democracy for the united tates? >> i'm a knight of norway. i've got to defend it. there are no tall no tall oppies in norway. we've totally underinvested in education. >> no tall what? >> no tall poppies. well, it's the old adage, the tall poppy gets cut first. everybody is pretty much the same. there's no poverty. there are no rich. they've left norway because they didn't want to pay the taxes. >> no tall what? it's not an ideal example. i just threw it in because they've been so extraordinarily well in husbanding their resources, namely their oil. norway has been the number-two oil exporter for decades, next to saudi arabia. they've saved the money. some day the oil will be gone, but they've got the money. ook, if i were 20 years old, of course, i think i'm in my midlife crisis now, anyway. >> if i were 20 years old, i'd try to go to with australia. australia is, to me, i've spent a lot of time there, the way california was, when i came here in 1957. it was upbeat, positive, can do, unaware of all kinds of problems. that's the way australia

that happened during the mccarthy er nanch the united tates versus hohe. during a hearing on august 5, 1954. senator mccarthy repeatedly questioned a lady from new york near buffalo, diana hogh. she was a coil winder at westing house company. she made $1.71 an hour. she professed her innocence just the way lois lerner did and then declined to answer subscent questions. in response to questioning from senator mccarthy, she stated i have never engaged in espionage nor sabotage. i will not so engage. i will not so engage in the future. i'm not a spy nor a saboteur. like chairman issa here, senator mccarthy concluded that his witness had waved her fifth amendment rights dsh waived her fifth amendment rights. explained to her that she had waived her fifth amendment rights and then she was brought up for criminal prosecution. that prosecution was thrown out n court and that is in the precedence. there is precedence for this and there is a procedural defect because it was not demanded of lois lerner that she answered the questions despite her assertion to have fi

points out that a lot of that is due to the fact that mexico has had a higher growth rate than the united tates during this recession we have seen was people coming over here for opportunity when they can find it over there. still, we have the challenge of how do you define an acceptable evel of border security. we double the number of agents on the border. we've built out the fence. that was envisioned 10 years ago. we have deployed technology and more manpower to go and try and secure. we are looking for drug tunnels underground along the california border, and the other parts of the border. how do you get to the definition of border security? >> that becomes the thing that we hear as part of the magazine. that is something that they feel strongly about. so strongly about it they feel that it needs to be the critical first step. it is difficult to define. let me throw numbers at you as you think about that. we share 1954 miles with mexico. texas has -- that. we have fenced off 100 and miles with mexico. areas in big bend where it ould make any sense. since 2001, we've increased the number of

the unites we joined were already in the field engaged with the enemy and we came in to replace other people who were no longer there either because they row tated't do that anymore. we do something much better. we take entire units who have trained together, lived together in the states, who know each other, who have families that know each other, and we move the units to combat with a fight together and they return home together. and while they're gone, their families remain at ft. hood, for example, going through life as normally as they possibly can, but reinforcing each other's strength. think about what would have happened in this last war, as frustrating as it was, if we did it the way we had done it in vietnam and previous wars, where units didn't -- were already over there and we just picked people at random and off they went to fight. you had 28 days to get your family out of quarters and find some other place for them to live. things would have been much, much better. military service is on the right track and i think they're going to get there. >> general mccaffrey the general talks to something you spoke to, we need to honor the liv

united states. many, not at all. more disturbing is the alarming number of countries that report very few, and in some cases, no lost or stolen databases. visa waiver countries are required to do so. europe,tates, canada, and other be wp partners have divided the vast majority of the 40 million records in the slt database. some of the most popular haveries in the world contributed few, if any, records to the database. the remarkable development, 40 million records added in the past 12 years, the lack of data provided by many interpol countries remains significant. of servingthe honor on the interpol executive i have beenea urging the organization to prioritize the program and other border security efforts as core functions of interpol. sure, there are real and current challenges to this decision. despite the fact dhs and the united states national bureau have worked to incorporate recommendations for data reporting and response times into interpol's standard manyting procedures, countries have not been able to connect their agencies and interpol does not require them to do so. the task ahead is encouraging our partners to more fully utilize the database and to engage in these kinds of border s