"nato rips off the united states. the united states." absolutely. trump will withhold... ..any kind of us assistance and will not want to be footing the bill for nato and european security and will not want to be giving countries any undue benefit in the trade space. so absolutely take that seriously. he's made a personal point of going after, for example, former chairman of thejoint chiefs mark milley, american general — he's even in the past referred to you as a... ..deep state stiff with a nice accent. this isn't a joke question. no, of course not. do you think if trump came into power again, he would go after people like you? yeah. i don't take it as a joke at all. and i think, again, people will have to ask themselves here and elsewhere, how are they going to interact with the united states, where we have a president who is basically taking revenge against anyone who's crossed him ? he's also got a list of people he doesn't like here in the united kingdom. and, you know, you might recall a previous uk ambassador w

territorial acquisition by the united states the first the united states needed dispossess the indigenous of the continent and extinguish their claims their land. now this manifests federal indian policy and the removal of native peoples to reservations in the pacific northwest. that process starts in the 1850s. that's going to be a subject, a future lecture. the second broad factor, which we will discuss today, is that the united states, the united states needed to interact with other non-native tive powers, particularly the nations of europe, in order to define american to territory. now, most american. came into the nations possession by wars or purchases the revolutionary war, as you see here on this slide, produced most the territory east of the mississippi river. the louisiana purchase in 1803 brought most of the lands between the mississippi river and rocky mountains into the nation and then war with mexico. in 1846 to 1848. in incorporated american southwest and then in 1867 the united states purchased alaska from russia. and so see, with each of those territorial acquisitions, th

should be unacceptable to the united states. there is no doubt to defeat the threat posed by hamas force is required and with the use of force no matter how judicious facing an enemy hiding behind civilians, there will be civilian casualties. but restraint in the acceptance of some military risk out of concern for innocent life are demonstrations even and especially when confronting a brutal enemy like thomas, concern for the innocent especially when fighting an enemy unbound by any morality, demonstrates the values for which the u.s. should stand and israel proclaims the same value meant to be the bedrock of our alliance. mr. president and unmitigated humanitarian disaster in gaza is not just a moral failure. it undermines american national security. it heightens the risk that the war might spread and draw american forces further into combat it sows the seeds of hate and prospects for a long-term sustainable peace between israelis and palestinians. it gives solders a terrorist who would strike americans and our allies abroad and

the united kingdom. for one thing, it's notjust about the united states. it's primarily about the united states. ally fundamentally disagree with you. it is not primarily about the united states. this is about european security. we've already had in the united kingdom before the invasion of ukraine, litvinenko of the skripals, you've had all kinds of operating operations going on in the united kingdom, assassinations in the tiergarten in berlin as well. russia has been a bad actor in europe against european security for a very long time here. that really wasn't my point. my point was it was the threat... it's not about where the response sits. yes, but the response doesn'tjust sit in the united states. if europe doesn't care and the united kingdom doesn't care about security, then the response sets the united states and then, yes, putin will prevail because the united states is not going to keep bailing out europe for 100 years. world war one, world war two, that's where the debate is. so if europe doesn't care in the united kingdom doesn't care, then absolutely that is probably going to mean tha

, the united states is not willing to do that, but united states is willing to exert some pressure, as face saving exercise, because ultimately this is huge embarrassment for the united states, there is revulsion throughout the world um about what israel is doing, and revulsion particularly among america's european allies, so um, given that this and the anger that is being directed. that israel is being now directed at the united states as israel's enabler, the biden administration has to do something, it has to come up with a formula, face saving formula whereby it can be seen to be on the side of the good guys, on the side of the victims, the innocents, while at the same time enabling israel, so it's a very delicate and of course a dishonest fine line that united states is growing, but um, that's uh, that's the situation, so this these um kind of extensions of the seasfire, they are being facilitated and enabled by the united states. well, harley, i mean, looking at this onslot that took place, this genocide that took place in gaza, what did israel get out of it, what has it acco

there are authoritarian currents in the united states. e are threats to human rights and civil rights. we have seen a huge bike and anti-asian racism. these are threats to human rights and democracy in the united states a well and geopolitical conflicts contributes to them. i want the two sides talking to accomplish something important but to open up space for real democracy to brew -- to move forward in china and the united states. guest: i think mr. werner's statement has a lot of idealistic efforts. yes, nobody wants to have a war and both sides have to work together. you have to find empirical evidence to prove that kind of model would work. after 50 years it has not worked, so we have to be very realistic. i think the chinese government, the caller is absolutely right. the chinese government does not represent the people. we have to understand what the chinese people is like under the government. there is a lot of economic growth, but a lot of people -- a lot of people in china are not wealthy. 40% of them are making five dollars a da

in this particular case, the united states. and what i'm genuine or wondering about is why washington would need something like this because the united states has a lot of influence on how international lawyers shape how it's applied. why would they need an alternative right into the number of reasons why washington might prefer to use the rules based international order rugs and international at, in my recent article i suggested street reads the 1st is that so united states is not a party to a number of a significant important creatures take, for instance, what was the c convention as united states is not a party to this convention. and so for this reason, one finds that it, that criticizes trying to was actions. and this task trying to see by i rotate to effect the child has by day to day international rules based order realizes and international frontier hosted by the treaties, particularly in the field of international emetic, terry law, or just an extra human right school to which united states is not a party type principal

the united states needs to get real. we do not desire war, but our enemies and adversaries have a say. they will choose where and when they fight. and the united states has interests in the world around it. we rely on free trade around the globe. we rely on an open society. the time to recognize that the united states has to invest in its defense is not when the war begins, but now, so that the united states can continue to deter aggression and protect itself without actually having to use that military force at a large scale. - dr. kagan, thank you for joining me on "firing line." - thank you, margaret. it's been a pleasure. - [announcer] "firing line" with margaret hoover is made possible in part by: robert granieri, vanessa and henry cornell, the fairweather foundation, the tepper foundation, the asness family foundation, the mckenna family foundation, charles r. schwab, and by the rosalind p. walter foundation, and damon button. corporate funding is provided by stephens inc. [bright music] [bright music continues] [li

people in the united states are actually angry because of what's happening in the united states. just imagine when biden is taking 160 billion dollars. to fund his wars in ukraine and to fund israel, and at the same time people in neighborhoods, black people in the you, latinos, arabs, immigrants are actually poor in the united states, poverty is rising, the situation in the united states, it's not good, and so it's very natural, not even from the perspective of being a good person, an anti-war person, you know, human who's saying? i don't want to see people dying, but also they look at their own internal situation and they see that this class that is ruling class of the united states is actually stealing their money, when we look at these billions and billions of dollars, what if biden got this money from his grandfather? biden is getting this, stealing this from the pockets of the united states workers, of the workers of the you, farmer. the teachers and the uh you know nurses and and the the people who are actually working the working people who and they're saying we don't want

, the united states is financing it, the united states is uh giving continuing to give israel cover on the international stage, the reason this is continued is because the united states is allowing it to continue uh israel wants to annex all of palestine uh, it's been slowly doing it for... forly doing that for 75 years, but wants to to hasten that now, accelerate it, and the united states allowing it to happen, the as your the other commentator said moment ago, the people in through the world support palestine, this has been shown in countless demonstrations in major cities around the world with hundreds of thousands of people gathering, but this information or this this resolve to help the people of gaza and people throughout palestine has not filtered up to the governments of these countries, governments of the united states, canada, throughout europe, even the uh the arab nations in the middle east are not lifting finger to assist the palestinians. rather they are further uh hurting them, further causing them harm. this is perplexing uh, the the support of the united states

the print is crazy. it's a nuclear state. it's under 200 feet by the united states and the european union. there's no equality between them and the palestinians add to the government, filed with the 6, not just telling me in the work. so one of that was threatening to nobody. so this is affective b tera and fear tactics on the ropes. the, you know, we're here we back is really well, if your, with you and you come out of your shapes and you go on the land. yeah, that will be all sorts of warfare icon predicted. i'm not in the, you know, confidence of the people 5 mean i don't deal with them, but this battle to be something like that. and you end up on this style the way they had you. uh. they was scared off of bones, place them detonate, has placed on the roads, etc, which is the goals guy from cvs, on the best and side operation enduring freedom. you remember that was cold and the same would happen in the middle east if they'd go in just like that. because they assume and that egypt would remain loyal to c, c. and c, c does as well. and the repression in egypt already is at its highest lev

, the united states is not willing to do that, but the united states is willing to exert some pressure. um as face saving um exercise, because ultimately this is huge embarrassment for the united states, there is revulsion throughout the world um about what israel is doing and revulsion particularly among america's european allies, so um given that this the anger that is being directed at israel is being now directed at the united states. as israel's enabler, the biden administration has to do something, it has to uh come up with a uh formula, face saving formula, whereby he can be seen to be uh on the side of the good guys, on the side of the victims, the innocents while at the same time, enabling israel, so it's a very delicate and of course a dishonest fine line that united states is drawing, but um that's uh... the situation, so this these um kind of extensions of the ceasefire, they are being uh facilitated and enabled by the united states. well, harley, i mean looking at this onslot that took place as genocide that took place in gaza, what did israel get out of it, what h

see a confident, open, ever-growing and prosperous united states, just like the united states. should not bet against china or interfere in china's internal affairs, instead they should welcome a peaceful , stable and prosperous china. and what about biden, it is necessary to ensure that the competition does not turn into a conflict, to lead responsibly this competition, these were the words of joe biden. by the way, when he was asked whether he trusts the chinese leader, the american president replied with the saying: "trust, but verify." but there was one point that could from this meeting , are you going to continue to call the president the dictator, the term you used before, look, he is, he's a dictator in the sense that he's the man who runs the country when biden made a similar comment in the summer, chinese officials were angry, calling it extremely absurd and irresponsible, it was the same now, the ministry of foreign affairs of china also condemned such a replica of china, biden. such words are extremely incorrect and irresponsible political manipulation. china categorically

you are a well-known influential person in the united states, and not only in the united states. ations, many people talk about it. do you imagine president biden actually removing phone, called president putin and voiced the proposals that you just talked about. i wouldn't say it's impossible because... this is the job of the president, for this presidents are paid money so that they make those decisions that are important for the security of their state, the policies of president biren put his country in a very dangerous situation, so i believe that the president in such a situation is obliged look for a solution, i personally believe that the people who are responsible for foreign policy in the biden administration are incompetent, we need to change them, we need to replace them with people who understand what is really happening, and there are such people in the usa , for the last 15 years they have been saying exactly what i just told you, for example, william bernst, director of the cia, in his was the us ambassador to russia in 2008, and he once wrote a famous message, it’s

aliens presently in the united states. stead the department of homeland security under secretary alejandro mayorkas has practice catch and release policies whereby illegals are detained but then released without any mechanism to ensure they show up to court for processing. by discriminating contracts for border wall construction, migrant protection protocols, remain in mexico, unlawfully granting parole and being complicit in title 42, alejandro mayorkas alejandro mayorkas alejandro mayorkas has made it easier for illegal people and drugs to enter the united states endangering american citizens and has it made it harder to expel such threats. alejandro mayorkas is an -- in his inability to enforce the law has engaged in a pattern of conduct that is incompatible with his duties as a civil officer of the united states. alejandro mayorkas in his failure to uphold it as by his actions lost the trust of the citizens of the united states to faithfully execute the laws of the united states, wherefore alejandro mayorkas does warran

well, the united states is not. not supporting israel, the united states is a full partner in crime withf native americans, are not in any way hastend to support the genocide of palestinians or any other people for that matter, and they have done it previously in other countries, in vietnam, and cambodia, and korea and other countries, so we have to be very clear that this is not a matter of the us putting some red lines, as if they are some sort of... to a coach for the state of israel, the question was wrong, the question should have been asked, one is the united states going to stop committing crimes against humanities, war crimes, violating international law, that's that should have been the question asked to mr. kirby, not the question of whether we will continue to wait to put red lines, that's not what the role of the us is, the role of the us is... not checking israel, the role of the us is basically like the role of head of a crime syndicate, what is its role with the other criminals? sure, same question to mr. barry grossman as well, we had a report earlier, memo leaked to the

well, israel, israel is not is not. really the real power, the real power is the united states, the united states, anytime israel get into any kind of real serious trouble, the united states always come to its rescue with weaponry, with money, with uh uh military intelligence, so the united states, you have here, you have zinonis, central bankers, as you know, in 1948, the the primary force behind the establishment of the zionist state with a roth child banker. the international bankers, they were behind the establishment of of that, today in the united states, these same bankers and others, they are behind the power of the zionist state of israel, so this is used to divide people, they use democracy. now to to more to answer your question more sicinctly is that what what the design state of israel did years and years ago, they saw that the plo was a real real problem for them, so what they did, they did what the united states did, the united states went out there, they established al-qaeda with bin layden and put them against the soviet union, so israelis they went out and they got some p

maybe something short of outright war between the united states. but outright war between the united states and china is a terrifying process. we need to step back before the brain can find a way to live with china so we can avoid the terrible consequences that the conflict would bring. and i think that the key to that is healthy competition which the biden administration says it is supporting. the problem with the approaches that sometimes it is competing that it is also excluding. we see this in the way that the biden administration has tried to cut off access from chinese companies to advanced technologies. if chinese companies cannot get the advanced technology that they cannot compete. that is not competition, that is exclusion. that is a terrible provocation. the chinese government is advanced and high technology and they see it as core to their technology and for the united states to say to china i am sorry, but you will not be allowed to compete, that puts us on the path to conflict. it is these exclusionary measures that we should be in voi

the international community must work with the united states or even against the united states to ensure that the crimes against humanity being supported by the united states, britain and others are. not continued into the future. all right, thanks lot, former un peacekeeper edward horgan, joining us from limerrick ireland. we're now going to bring in coordinator of the zaksaki foundation, south africa, mr. zein abidin gaddafi, joining us from cape town. mr. gaddafi, welcome to the program. i want to start off with you with the recent comments made by a leader of iran's islamic revolution, just recently he said that the historic alaxa flood operation uh by the uh resistance uh... forces in gaza actually disrupted the us policies in the region. i want you to elaborate to elaborate on that for us and whether you agree with that regard. thank you very much for having us of course and indeed the leader of the islamic revolution said ali khamenei, when he expresses the sentiment, it comes from a place of wisdom and a place of deep analysis of the current geopolitical and military situation in

independence of europe and distancing from the united statesever comes to power, they are in favor of a strategic alliance in the united states, that is, in other words, in in europe, everyone focuses on who is your main trading partner, who owns the majority of your debts, and where are your main markets, and european states are basically divided on this basis. and who is left or right is more of an internal issue, how did they get visas, this migrant, but globally, so far we see in europe, here is an alliance of countries that are oriented either towards strategic france or the union with the united states, those countries will to support ukraine, because both options mean confrontation with russia and protection and threat from the side of russia thank you very much, thank you very much, petro burkovskyi, executive director, analyst of the ilko kuchayev foundation for democratic initiatives, if there is mr. arkady, then i would like someone to tell me in my ear whether he is there or not, i mean arkady milman, a diplomat , former ambassador

therefore, china is not yet ready to sit down at the table with the united states to discuss this topica very realistic position on this issue, so it would probably be inappropriate for the united states to expect china to join these negotiations, or to try to somehow influence russia in order to. russia dragged china, involved china in these negotiations, i think it’s premature, for it would be premature to involve you, thank you, thank you for your words of wisdom, thank you for your time, we hope to see you again soon on our program, thank you dmitry, it makes no difference to him whether it’s to the side or to the forehead, he penetrates 1,300 mm behind dynamic protection, recently british ones were shot down for the first time with this weapon challengers, an english journalist came up , and where does he say it’s convenient to be in a tank next to a tank, 35 years old, he’s still a boy, he heads the instrument making bureau in tula, he said, i always demand the impossible. the target was discovered by azima 61, this is the pantsius anti-aircraft missile and gun complex, which carr

to the united states of america. it's been my administration's outlook from day one, and we have clearly laid out our approach with our indo-pacific strategy. we're we're delivering across the board, including when it comes to our shared economic agenda, the united states has deep ties with our fellow economy. more than 60% of u.s. exports go to fellow economy is robust to aid investment between the united states and neighboring countries. supports good jobs, new opportunities all across the region, and american businesses significantly represented here in this auditorium are the largest source of foreign direct investment in apic economies. in fact, we take just u.s. companies represented here at the summit and look at their new investments. they pack economies in a calendar year. in total, more than $50 billion so far. investments announced today from come from companies like amazon, united, delta, microsoft to make sure our region is more inclusive and interconnected. investments announced today from companies like

states can compete, we are we know in what form the united states competes and howect to talk about the polycentricity of this world, that is, the state is the key centers that unite around themselves local human civilizations, local, well, if i may say so, local human civilizations, that is, there is our general civilization, and there is a local one, and we will see the same thing, where these key states are, for example, western civilization or western civilization or american americana, it is clear that they are american-centric, there is a state that controls activities within its civilization, if we look, for example, east slavic or russian civilization, recently a very interesting document was adopted, including in the russian federation, called the concept of external security, which says that now the russian federation should be considered, and this is correct, precisely as a state of civilization, i think we will return to this definition also, also in this very region, russia exercises control and, accordingly , the diversity of all these forms of politic

biden said he was honored to host shizen pina in the united states. in turn, told biden that he considers bilateral relations between the united states and china the most important in the whole world. as a result , the negotiations between the leaders lasted more than two hours; after the negotiations, as reported by journalists from the white house pool, a working dinner was held. then, after dinner, biden and xi walked around the local park without accompaniment. well , we’ll find out the details and meetings from channel one’s own correspondent in the united states, mikhail akinchenko. he is now in san francisco. mikhail, hello. yes, hello, but... if we talk about the results of the meeting, then of course, probably, the main result of the meeting is that the heads of state still talked, and they didn’t talk to each other, but a whole year after the g20 summit they nabali. i must say that at a press conference following the meeting with sidzenping, biden looked pleased, he called the discussion productive and constructive, and declared the restorati

which is damaging the credibility of not just the united nations, but the united states. n uh, from not just the international community, but let's say from arab governments to put pressure on israel to uh implement a cease fire, to stop the the massacre. and genocide of palestinians in gaza, yes, the united nation, the purpose of establishment of united nations was to create the peace, to to to protect the world from the wars, but unfortunately has been fair and now it, it's become a end of especially the us. english and others, so now in this situation, even antonio gotras speaking, sometime he speaks in the floor about the palestinian issue, but this is this time not for his speaches, this time to take some practical actions, this time demands practical actions of un and international community and international organization, but unfortunately and very very unfortunately. they all are their appropriate role in regarding to stop the gen why united nations general assembly did not put the resolution against the... us, why they are not demanding, demanding from united stat

engaged in the work with money allocated by the united nations, that is, even the united nations is a tool for promoting the national interests of the united statesr anyone to get this contract, or this order for non-american organizations. in finland they really don’t like to remember the heinous crimes committed during the second world war. the finnish army had equipment from almost all of europe. it feels like all of europe wanted the finnish army, together with the german army, to defeat the soviet union. finland pursued a pronounced policy of genocide. regarding my claim, the answer was that finland did not commit any crimes in the war. finnish authorities planned to completely get rid of the entire russian population in the territories annexed to great finland. a tragic mistake by joining the nato bloc. when they fought with russia, they were always defeated. you want to leave, you don’t want to, we don’t want to, it’s just a necessity, yes vasya is at mom’s, vasya is at mom’s, rit, well, go, tell me about yourself, how are you, she’s already 11, it’s saturday, it’s our birthday, from all vgtrk company wish you happiness, health, why are yo

example, as we speak, literally as we speak, the secretary of state of the united states is in israel. trying to ask the israelis to engage in a pause, i guess eupumism for a temporary ceasefire while humanitarian aid comes in and apparently is not having any success, what leverage does he have? he has remarkably little leverage, the fact is that the united states and israel are joined at the hip, there are no two countries in recorded history that have a closer relationship than the united states and israel, and when this crisis broke out on october 7th, the biden administration made it very clear from the get go that we would give uh israel whatever aid it needed and that meant both weapons and money and that we would support israel to the help and we have done that and once you take into account that that tight relationship and just how committed we already. are uh to this war, it's very difficult for us to back off and then to begin to put pressure on israel to do x or y or z. excuse me, i mean, there's no question that blincan can go to the middle east and he can try to put press

well, the key question is what is happening now in the united states regarding money for ukraine, we tand that there were several versions. the latest events are the democrats blocking the republicans if they do not support the combination of two aid packages for ukraine and the state of israel. i think that everything is not so bad. it is no secret that the number of republicans is growing opposes any military aid to ukraine or any other country. and yet they are a minority in the party, the democrats did the right thing tactically in this situation, because they know that far right republicans, especially evangelical christians, want to help israel, and many of them would rather help israel than ukraine, so the democrats are wise to push aid to ukraine, and this aid will definitely reach ukraine, this is just a short-term political struggle that takes place in washington, but which ultimately does not will lead to the fact that ukraine will not receive anything, the commander-in-chief of the armed forces of ukraine, general valery zaluzhnyi, published certain theses in the economist

interior of the united states. least 280 people on terrorist watch lists caught while attempting to cross the border between ports of entry. approximately 400,000 unaccompanied illegal alien children encountered at the southern board we are at least 85,000 of these children having gone missing. at least 1,424 deaths of illegals at the southern border. approximately 73,000 special interest aliens arrested at our border, which are aliens from a nation that promotes terrorist activity, harbors terrorists or poses a security threat to the united states. this is the number aired at the borderer, not counting however many of the 1,800,000 known gotaways are special interest aliens. approximately 659 special interest aliens from iran, approximately 6,386 special interest aliens from afghanistan, approximately 538 special interest aliens from syria, approximately 3,153 special interest aliens from egypt, approximately 12,624 special interest aliens from uzbekistan, approximately 30,830 special interest aliens from turkiye,

government, so yes, so it is drawing clear lines in the sand, the united states is clearly complicit in genocide, for those that know anything about the history of the united states government, his manifest destiny role of conquering the world of playing some type of role in extrapulating and people um in northern africa confident itself, you know, we understand that this is what's going on. the point i would like to make uh my listeners is that um there is definite role that has to be played with the uh human rights movements and the revolutionary movements inside the united states, so what we have now, we have massive protests, if you're able to follow it, because lot of times the major networks are not following the fact that uh two weekends ago... there is you know close to 200,0 people in the streets of washington dc, these are some of the largest demonstrations in uf in us history, that's really not being covered too much by the news to let you know listening audience that the the people on the ground and the movements in the united states clearly support our sisters and brothe

in europe, the united states implemented the marshal's plan.ng, the americans viewed the marshall plan as a means to bring down the post-war revolutionary upsurge. and of course they had very good reasons for concern. in the main countries, italy, france, there were very powerful communist parties. in italy. the communist party numbered 2 million people, and had about 20% of the seats in parliament in france, although the communist party probably had about a million people, but a third of the french population supported the communists. the world had such an opportunity, so to speak, to increase the number of red dots on the planet and the red, or left ones. governments in the world but there were several, so to speak, circumstances that prevented this , the same korean war, from a propaganda point of view, was presented in such a way that south korea is democrats, but north korea is a dictatorship, the division of vietnam into northern and southern, exactly it was also presented, all the actions of the soviet union and the chinese people's repu

does. the us have, example, as we speak, literally, as we speak, the secretary of state of the united states is in israel, trying to ask the israelis to engage in a pause, i guess euphamism for a temporary ceasefire while humanitarian aid comes in, and apparently is not having any success, what leverage does he have? he has remarkably little leverage, the fact is that the united states and or joined at the hip, there are no two countries in recorded history that have a closer relationship than the united states and israel, and when this crisis broke out on october 7th, the biden administration made it very clear from the getco that we would give israel whatever aid it needed and that meant both weapons and money and that we would israel to the helt, and we have done that, and once you take into account that that tight relationship and just how committed we already are, to this war, it's very difficult for us to back off and then to begin to put pressure on israel to do x or y or z, excuse me, i mean, there's no question that blincon can go to the middle east and he can try to put pres

information, and this information is like this, trump is planning to establish a dictatorship in the united states, the question is for you as a person with experience in international relations, it is even theoretically possible in a country like the united states, with a balance of power with a huge centuries-old history democracy, to establish a dictatorship, this is theoretical, and even if it is possible, it is difficult to say theoretically. maybe impossible, but again theoretically, i think it's impossible, at least in the united states that we know that exist now, it is impossible , because there are safeguards, there are institutions, and i think that it is impossible, at the same time, it is absolutely clear that, if god forbid, there will be a new reshuffle. trump, this will be the presidency, he has already said about it himself, revenge and it is quite clear that it will affect the issue of democratic principles and everything that was done by his successor, and in this case his predecessor, that is, i don’t think a dictatorship , but there will certainly be serious attempts to take r

could not solve in his many years of history, yes, they took him out of... the economies of the united states china, and moreover, in his technological development, china, of course, is number two is coming, but he came closer to the united states, using its technologies, patents, joint scientific developments, came much closer than the soviet union, well, in the era of its most successful development, all this was threatened by these ambitions, china chis seduced his party company with a promise yes to taiwan, elect me for a third term, i will return taiwan to you, it was said in plain text why he came to washington now, in my opinion he has a very pleasant situation in china, taiwan does not smell good to me, after all, they were counting on that, all the dictators of the world, pu and the iranian ato and china, and were inspired by this picture of the catastrophic revolutionary catastrophe of the flight from afghanistan, but they saw this televised picture as a metaphor for america's withdrawal from world politics, and xi very competently developed the program for the return of taiwan , he

i consider the security of the united states. as you know, i live here in turkey, and when president erdogan's team asked what i thought were the issues on which the united states and turkey could work together, the first issue on the list, back in january 2021, was ukraine. for biden , ukraine is really important, remember how he dealt with the issue in ukraine under president obama, and in general for biden, nato and deterring russian aggression by solving global problems is where his foreign policy starts, for him everything starts with nato, and this is what concerns ukraine as a future nato member who is now fighting for nato to prevent russia from attacking its territory . biden knows it, secretary blinkin, national security adviser sullivan. they all act from this point of view. so, from the point of view of the executive branch, israel is of course a political issue, based on the domestic contemporary american politics. this is perhaps the most important thing a foreign policy issue that has always been so because of the j

our first guest is matthew bryza, former adviser to the united states secretary of state, former director of europe-taurusian affairs at the us national security council. greetings, dear mr. ambassador. glory to ukraine. glory as a hero. well, the key issue is what is happening now in the united states, around money for ukraine, we understand, there were several versions. the latest events are that the democrats blocked the republicans for ukraine and for the state israel. i think that everything is not so bad. it's no secret that in the republic. the number of those who oppose any military aid to ukraine or any other country is growing. and yet they are a minority in the party, the democrats did the right thing tactically in this situation, because they know that far-right republicans, especially evangelical christians, want to help israel, and many of them would rather help israel than ukraine. so the democrats are wisely promoting aid to ukraine. and this aid to ukraine will definitely come, this is just a short-term political struggle, which is currently going on in washington, but wh

probably be the most correct, if not for the torpedoing of all the decisions of the united nations organization by the united statesble to get negotiations on the track. to all participants in the western coalition and either the third world war, but there will be no winners, well, as a matter of fact, now we will look at the background of this visit, against the background of these negotiations, which, of course, are about the state of affairs in the world, but where is the ukrainian topic , which like the united states puts almost at the top of the world list... was practically not heard, at least in the public part, please note, it seems to be absent , that is, everyone, everyone on both sides understood that how to decide on this matter, well, it ’s better not to, because their positions are too far apart, i mean exactly this, that it became obvious to everyone that if they will be determined by the ukrainian conflict, this immediately even the remnants of some kind of mutual understanding will dissipate, so against the backdrop of this visit , what is the position of the united states on the development of thi

, the united states, ukraine and israel. blicans are very dependent on security measures at the border between the united states and. this is an eternal problem, an eternal problem of american security, we remember that talking about this problem and the need to solve it in a big way led to the white house of donald trump, who is still successfully competing for the republican nomination, has a huge chance to to become the republican candidate for president of the united states, and of course, there are supporters of donald trump in the american congress, and among them is the new speaker, michael jordan. are doing everything possible to ensure that the trumpist line wins in american politics, but the question arises: who do they want to make weak in the eyes of the american voter, the republicans who are supporters of the former president of the united states, the current president of the united states, joseph biden, or the united states itself, this is very important question, because it is not only about how much ukraine i

of the united states of america, but uh, i suspect that when it comes to some actions of the united lation to russia or in a more global context, he probably always, but what will the opposite country say, or think, or do about this, in this case the russian federation, not in the sense that he i wanted to somehow adjust us policy to the actions of american opponents. but in the sense that he always calculated american actions several steps ahead, and he always, probably, suggested to all those with whom he spoke to take into account the possible actions of opponents. so, uh, i think that the crisis in relations between russia and the united states, well, perhaps, conditionally speaking, came at the moment when henry kissinger stopped participating in such meetings, i repeat again, i’m talking about this in the conditional subjunctive mood, when stopped participate in henry kissinger with his question, what does russia think or is going to do about this, and when one day during the next discussion this natural question arose, someone in this oval office said for the first time, what