the united states. the jury, the sovereign, united states proper. no other government control his action but our government and while it's in the united states under his own constitution, he shoots in order to hypothetically. >> our justice fought here so is it any time that the us officer is in the united states, that satisfies the question. >> no, it does not. >> if part of the injury occurs in a different jurisdiction, >> it's because the injury occurs in close proximity and this is unique area that i would invite the current to look at exhibit 1a which shows this covert does not delineate where the united states ends and where. >> i assume that's true of a lot of borders. >> the reason that's important in regards to the proof of that statement is because the united states exercises some degree of control into the culvert and as michael fisher said in his testimony to congress, they project outwards . >> is the government of mexico agree with that. >>. >> the government of mexico agrees that there sovereign is violating in the united states, they

the united states law operated on a united states official who is acting inside the united states. is case as far as the conduct is concerned has united states written all over it. the border patrol guard doesn't take his borders from mexico. >> i think it would be up to the united states to prosecute mr. mesa when they choose to do so and provide a remedy to the petitioners. >> there wouldn't be any damages for their 15-year-old son for their emotional suffering. following up on what justice ginsburg is saying, the more fundamental question, which is i don't say you are the u.s. government that anyone is condoning people standing at the border and taking shots at mexicans. and yes, there is a criminal remedy for the government to the decade this position and why should there not be a civil remedy and either an error this amendment. with the shooting that mexican citizens be into the content? >> where was the line applied as presented by the petitioners as far as they could travel. >> it would apply when the action that violates the amendment takes place in the united states and whe

it's the united states law operating on the united states official who is acting inside the united stateshis case has, as far as the conduct is concerned, united states written all over it. there's nothing about mexico. the border patrol guard doesn't take his orders from mexico. >> and then i think it would be up to the united states to prosecute mr. mesa criminally if they were to choose that if they were to choose to do so, which would provide a remedy to the petitioners. >> why? they wouldn't get any damages for the deat the death of the 1d son for their emotional suffering. but i think i have come following up on what justice ginsburg is saying, a more fundamental question, which is i don't think you are the u.s. government is suggesting that anyone is condoning people standing at the border and taking potshots at passing mexicans. >> absolutely not. >> all right. and yes, there's a remedy, criminal remedy for the government to vindicate its position, but why should there not be a civil remedy to ensure that border police are complying with the constitution? either under the fourth o

to become a refugee to the united states and go through all the background checks and live in a refugee camp. those who were committing terrorist activities had arrived in the united states. included in the ranks were many who had borne in the united states -- had been born in the united states. most people don't know, mr. president, we hav enoe not precluded or stoppped. we should focus on individuals who are engaged in suspicious behavior. not target entire muslim countries for the entire refugee population. it makes no sense, even president trump's department of homeland security. says as much. this president is determined to go forward with the muslim band. he is determined to instill. in our hearts. that is not how america works. it is not how we will move forward. that is not blame immigrants and refugees for our economic challenges. we should work together. in the spirit of post-world war ii america, setting an example for the world to build a better america for all americans, including new americans, no matter the color of their skin, with her parents were born or how they prayed. mr. president, i yield the floor. washington journal, live every day with ne

law enforcement officer who's 100% of his conduct is inside the united states. the sovereign united states property. no other government could control his actions but our government and while inside the united states under his own constitution which he has sworn to abide by, he shoots. you know, the hypothetical that i have may -- >> just to stop you there, so is it anytime that the u.s. officer is in the united states that that satisfies the question under boumediene? >> no it, does not. >> it's because the injury occurs in a different jurisdiction, right? >> it's because the injury occurs in close proximity. and this is a unique area. again, i would invite the court to look at exhibit 180 of the appendix which shows this culvert does not delineate where the united states ends and where -- >> i assume that's true of a lot of borders. >> and the reason that's important in regards to the truth of that statement is because the united states exercises some degree of control into the culvert and as michael fisher said in his testimony to congress, they project outwards from the border.

the united states was not frightened by the fear mongers when it came to these refugees joining us in the united states. we shouldn't be today. let's be clear, refugees coming to our country this day, are the most carefully vetted and investigated of all travelers to the united states. before a refugee is admitted to the united states they have pass careful, rigorous security screening. all of that screening takes place before the even set foot in america. syrian refugees undergo a new layer of enhanced review before they are allowed to come to america. own department's of homeland security said the travel ban will not make it safer. listen to the memo from the department of homeland security's office of intelligence analysis. president trump's administration, and i quote, "country of citizenship is unlikely to be a reliable indicator of potential terrorist activity. since the beginning of the syrian conflict on march 2011, the foreign-born primarily us-based individuals who were inspired by a foreign terrorist organization to participate in terrorist activities were citizens of different countr

it is also placed with the united states is vulnerable to mexican pressure. the united states is more dependent on trade and capitol flow with mexico than most americans realize. mexico is pllaying the ground wk for exploiting the many vulnerabilities the united states has. mexican has experience targeting trade where they will exact the greatest political costs for the united states. they did this during the trucking dispute quite precisely and they are setting the ground work to do it again on the renegotiation of nafta. mexico is experiencing negotiating with argentina and brazil. with their negotiating is new sources for agricultural ip put specifically corn. mexico imports 80% of its corn from the united states and looking for new sources to target corn farmers can tariff provisions if need be. without nafta, trade would convert to wto tariff rates. for the united states, that's 3%. that's the rate the united states charges trade with the rest of the world. mexico has a slightly higher rate, 8%. so the united states exports to mexico would hurt more than mexican ex

one of the things i realized in researching what marti wrote about the united states is that the lessons about race in the united states informed his desire to see a raceless cuba, one that was open and available for everybody. so his experience in the united states in one sense helped him develop a more comprehensive view of what cuba should be. he comes in 1880, he is away for approximately six months in venezuela. then he comes back to the united states. he was living mainly in new york city. certainly in the 1880s, he took on the job of writing about the united states for latin american newspapers. in mexico and argentina. he wrote for two of the biggest, most important newspapers in latin america telling them about what was happening in the united states. part of that was what he observed living in new york. a lot of that was what he observed or absorbed from u.s. newspapers. he read and essentially translated and then seasoned with his own style what he saw happening. what did he see? he saw prosperous black citizens living in the north. he reports on parades, sixth avenue, of former slaves who were living

a greater rationale for this court to extend those protections given the fact the united states planned the act in the united states with mr. verdugo in the united states and the search occurring in mexico. the seizure occurs in the igo. mr. hernandez is in mexico. he is outside the united states. there is no defect of jurisdiction of the colbert in this area. -- culvert in this area. it is dissimilar from bu middian . bu middian, who controlled the base. here we know that this culvert, as far as paving at, keeping it up, spending millions of dollars seeing that it's ever filled with water goes across. ships are free, etc. it is a joint effort of the mexico and the united states. this is not just like a fence. it is an area of two fences and between those two areas is joint exercise of border maintenance authority. so i guess it is like nothing i have seen before. but if it's like nothing i have seen before, what is the problem with taking justice ginsburg's approach and applying it to that add,of area where, i might 500,000 people walk across it every day? it is a fair inference that perhaps an american cit

the atlantic. need a is also why we firm united states stance russia. ecause if the united states retreats from europe, then russia will advance, and you soon see that then europe split. europe would be more hostile towards the united states. definitely not in the interest of the united states. host: okay. former nato second general anders fogh rasmussen. usnk you so much for joining today. guest: thank you. great pleasure. host: and coming up, we will be alking to environment and energy reporter zach coleman. he's here to discuss the trump to undo ation efforts obama e ra climate policies. we'll talk to oreign affairs contributor tom nickols on the issue of how americans have are lost faith in could be a why this problem moving forward. we'll be right back. anouncer: this weekend, c-span's city tour with the help of our will t cable partners ecplore the literary scene and chico, california. the author tells us about the chico on his book california." and 1841-1900. >> the most important and long lasting relationship with the ederal starting in his days with congress was hi

so specifically what can the united states do, what can the ambassador for the united states do to holdries accountable to, as you said, to address the fact that many of them don't have america's back at the u.n.? >> you want to see my list, don't you? >> yeah. we only have a little bit of time, but, you know. >> you know, basically what it comes down to is i'm not there to play. and what i wanted to make sure of was that the united states started leading again. and -- [ applause ] >> leading isn't saying and doing things when it's comfortable. leading's saying and doing things when it's not comfortable. [ applause ] >> so the goal was have the backs of our allies, never again do what we saw happen with resolution 2334 and make anyone question our support. [ applause ] >> when resolution 2334 happened, and the u.s. abstained, the entire country felt a kick in the gut. we had just done something that showed the united states at its weakest point ever. never do we not have the backs of our friends. we don't have a greater friend than israel. [ applause ] >> and to see that happen was not

, the structure make ags it highly dependent on trade and capital flows with the united states, but also place with the united states is vulnerable to mexican pressure. the united states is more dependent on trade and capital flows with mexico than most americans realize and laying the grown for exploiting the many vulnerabilities they have. they will exact the greatest political costs for the united states. they did this during the trucking dispute quite precisely and setting ground work on the renegotiation of nafta. mexico is experiencing negotiating as well with argentina and brazil with their negotiating is new sources for agricultural import specifically corn, mexico imports 80% and looking with tariff provisions if need be. without nafta trade would revert to wto complaint tariff rates, for the united states that's 3%. the rate the united states charges with the trade for the rest of the world. mexico has a slightly higher, 8%. it would hurt more and on agriculture rates, their compliance rate is 20%. so this outcome would hurt the united states more than mexico in terms of exports. finally mexico has

the atlantic. need a is also why we firm united states stance russia. ecause if the united states retreats from europe, then russia will advance, and you soon see that then europe split. europe would be more hostile towards the united states. definitely not in the interest of the united states. host: okay. former nato second general anders hillaryremarks from clinton at georgetown university today. this will be mrs. clinton's first speech in washington since the presidential election. this is live coverage on c-span. >> 8, 10, 12 month 14.

the book w we're talking about s called "jose marti, the united states, and race" and because he lived in the unitedstates for nearly 15 years and because he wrote so much about the united states and a very crucial time, the aftermath of the civil war, reliving events of that, great emigration coming into the united states, the exploration of the west, pushing indians off their lands come all this is part of the landscape of the united states that jose marti wrote about. and race is a big part of that. race is also important because marti who wanted to get cuba free from spain, that didn't happen until after the spanish-american war of 1898, realized that for cuba to succeed as the republic, a free nation, blacks and whites needed to work together and it needed to be a cuba for all. and one of the things i realized in researching what marti wrote about the united states is that the lessons about race in the united states informed his desire to see a graceless cuba that was open and available for everybody. so in one sense he experienced the united states helped him develop a more comprehensive view

the united states refused to let the ssa lose stock in our country. sitting over 900 jewish refugees backhe to europe where many died in concentration camps. after that tragic failure in the united states, after we turned , our back on jewish refugees fleeing hitler, the united states examined its conscious st and came up with a new program. it came up with a new approach and it was bipartisan. since world war ii, the americag people work to set an example of the world by accepting refugees. listen to those we have been accepted and have been a part of america. over 400,000 eastern europeans after world war ii. close to. close to 400,000 vietnamese refugees fleeing the vietnamfugr war. approximately 650,000 cuban refugees after castro came into power. let me note that for hispanic united states senators today, three can trace their roots to this cuban migration to the united states. senate represe refugees.prese they sit on the floor of the senate representing some of our great states, and yet with this president, he is asking them and all of us to ignore this history.ooking for we have accepted more than 150,000 refugees from the former yugoslavia. over 100,000 soviet jews who

so please join me in welcoming the agent of that change, the united states ambassador to the united statese honorable nikki haley. ♪ >> thank you so much. thank you. wow. that's crazy. thank you so much. that's very nice. that's amazing. [ applause ] >> ambassador, i think they are a little lukewarm. i'm just not sure what the reception is going to be like. so let's pick up on where i left off in my introduction, that statement you made following the meeting, the security council meeting on the middle east. were you surprised what you saw about the attitudes and discussions on the middle east at the u.n. and what could be done to change it? >> you know, i was confused. it was totally bizarre because in my first month talking about the middle east there's a lot to talk about and whether you are talking about hezbollah or isis, all the issues in syria, which is, you know, a problem, that's what i expected us to talk about. i didn't expect an israel bashing session and literally listening to each member say the same thing over and over again, i knew they said it was bad, but until you hear it

area of foreign affairs. >> we're not attacking the policy of the united states government in regards to mexico. in fact, the policy off the united states is a border patrol agent should not use deadly force without implement peril. >> the policy of the united states i suppose we can ask them, they're not going to give any compensation from a special bill from congress or an executor agreement. a serious injury goes unaddressed and if we assume that the officer was completely at fault, and that there's really no defense, we don't know what the facts are but if we assume the facts most favorably to you, there should be some relief. but isn't this an urgent matter of separation of powers for to us respect the duty, the principal rule that the executive and the legislative have with respect to foreign affairs? >> justice kennedy, i would say it is an urgent mat of separation of powers but it would be the opposite. the fact pattern if the court may recall is officer maze had grabbed one of sergio's friends and had him by the scruff of the collar next to him in the united states. had he shot that boy, that would be a bivens claim. jus

states of america.ec world, my job is to represent the united states of america.ct, my job is to represent the united states of america.t the my job is to represent the united states of america.pt the, my job is to represent the united states of america.rt the world, my job is to represent the united states of america.et world, my job is to represent the united states of america.st world, my job is to represent the united states of america.et world, my job is to represent the united states of america.nt world, my job is to represent the united states of america. but we know that america is better off when there is less conflict, not more. we must learn from the mistakes of the past. we have seen the war and the destruction that have ravaged and raged throughout the world, all across the world. the only long-term solution for these humanitarian disasters in many cases is create the conditions where displaced persons can safely return home and begin the long, long process of rebuilding. america is willing to find new friends and forth new partnerships, where shared interests align. we want harmony and

these are individuals that have gone out on the most extraordinary length to help the united states -- limb to help the united states. they have helped as translators and interpreters during the wars, at the height of the wars in particular. those visas were developed to allow those individuals that helped the had estates come to -- united states to come to the united states because their lives are in danger because of that work. there were pushing pull factors there. there was great really from the iraqis, trepidation from the rest of the region and what folks in the region might be expensing as a result of this order. host: we have calls lined up for you. kelly, rome georgia -- rome, georgia. you are first. caller: thank you. -- thank you for taking my call. i do agree -- i am glad that .rump dropped iraq from the ban especially interpreters and everything -- i think that was a great move. just -- a brief story, if you will allow me. i work at the boys and girls town, andin my local , in i teach a ballet class allow the muslim girls to wear their hair bosch -- and i'm one of those people as a christian, i w

heard about this before but i knew that many of my mexican friends and united states had these scholarships. that's in the united states -- in the united states had these scholarships. i said, wonder if anyone had written history of that. no one had. i got very interested and pursue the topic. ms. cullison: it came out of a personal situation. i had been living in brazil for a while, and i ended up bringing back the man who eventually was my husband and the father of my son. the process that he went through in order to have a fiance visa and then to become a permanent resident and a citizen, i started to question the way the whole policy worked. and it wanted to see how it had changed. host: rachel mentioned flows of migration. how is mexican migration broadly different from other immigration, a border country? what about this flow of back and forth between the united states? what is the historical context for that? ms. cullison: the historical context has a lot to do with the fact that much of the u.s., the western region used to be mexico. so, there has for more than, you know, more than a century, been a circ

the united states. m he says. he's now in the united states. e he says. he's now in the united states. t. ow in the united states. w. he's now in the united states. his family wanted to make sure he got out of russia so he was able to recover. right after he was poisoned i spoke to his wife who also, somewhat shockingly, sat down, did the interview and she told me at the time that as soon as he was taken off of the respirators and the life support systems, as soon as he was unplugged she wanted to get him out of the country. >> richard, it is widely believed that he was -- this attempted murder was something that was carried out by the russian security services or people related to the russian security services. that he was targeted because he's an opposition figure. >> he fully believes that. >> what do you make of those contentions? >> well, if you look at the pattern here, a lot of people who have been outspoken critics have had untimely health problems and sometimes death. you mentioned earlier and showed that disturbing picture of boris nemtsov who's on the bridge right next to the kr

the united states will not turn a blind eye to this anymore. [applause] i think you would all agree that this has been a pretty refreshing change. me in welcoming the agent of that change, the unitedtes ambassador to the united nations, the honorable nikki haley. [applause] ♪ >> ambassador, i think they are a little lukewarm. not sure with the reception is going to be like. let's pick up on where i left off in my introduction. that statement you made following the meeting on the middle east. were you surprised what you saw about the attitudes and discussions on the middle east? what can be done to change it? confused.: i was it was totally bizarre because in my first month, talking about the middle east, there is a lot to talk about. whether you are talking about has blood or isis, all the issues in syria, which is a problem. that is what i expected us to talk about. i did not expect in israel hashing session. literally listening to each overr say the same thing and over again, i knew they said it was bad, but until you hear it and see it, you just can't comprehend how ridiculous it is. [applause] here areof people getting to know you for the first time. the theme of our conferenc

amphibiouse largest operation undertaken by the united states. the united states had never undertaken any kind of operation of this nature. important foris our military to understand how did this come off? how did we capture a fixed fortified position? this river could control trade and was a major port. so, this was incredibly important for the confederacy. during the war of 1812, there was a battery here. but nothing was truly built in april south seceded 1861. they came down here and started building fort fisher. they built supplies for confederate forces, whether they be civilian or military. this was the primary fort for most blockade runners for confederate goods. when they got into wilmington they could offer to trains and they could get into richmond. as the ships approached the , they werearea posted all across the river. johnston, fort anderson, which is three miles upriver. you had a number of batteries that were all over the area. that was all meant to try to keep the union fleet from sailing up the cape fear river like they had done at new orle

the united states do? what can the ambassador from the united states due to hold countries accountable for as you them, manyem do not have america's back at the u.n.? haley: you want to see my list, don't you? i am not there to play. what i wanted to make sure of was that the united states started leading again. [applause] amb. haley: leading is not saying a.m. doing things when it is comfortable. leading is saying and doing things when it is not comfortable. [applause] ambassador haley's so the goal was, have the backs of our allies. never again do what we saw happen with resolution 32 34 and me anyone question our support. -- never again do what we saw happen with the resolution and question our support. [applause] ambassador haley when the -- lution happened amb. haley: when the resolution happened, the whole country had a kick in the guts. it showed the united states at its weakest point ever. never do we not have the backs of our friends. we do not have a greater friend israel. [applause] to seeley: he ended, that happen was hurtful. -- and to see that happen was hurtful. know that,em to look, that hap

and you know what, the united states signed up for that platform. the people of the united states signed up for that platform. believe ines, we enterprise, freedom, we believe in democracy, we believe in transparency. we believe in the empowerment of individuals that they can take control of their own lives. and america has effectively forged out over the last 100 that is global empire the first time is not relied on the invasion of other countries in order to win over their hearts and minds. who hasn't had to go on congregations in order to spread their values. a unique position in the history of humanity has been given to the united states because the united states embodies values. and what happened? people joined up. they wanted to join the great american dream. american scalded exceptionalism -- americans called it exceptionalism. four corners of the earth. it is more than that. countries all over the world walking away from communism, socialism, totalitarianism. wanting to embrace the values a basis of united states with sacrifices soldiers to help deliver a better wor

they wanted this to be a display of their capability that would threaten the united states, hurt the united states, humble the united states and make us see them as equals. right? they didn't want anybody else to get credit for this work. they didn't particularly want to cover their tracks here. they did this -- one of the things we had confirmed by the fbi and nsa director is that the russians did this in as loud of ways as possible in terms of how they mounted the attack. >> why do you think that they did not mind being loud and being found out? >> i don't know the answer for sure i think their number one mission is to compromise the nation and it might be that they wanted us to help them by telling people what they were doing. their loudness in a way would be counting on us to amplify it by telling the american people what we saw and freaking people out about how the russians might be undermining our elections. >> freaking people out. the russians didn't mind leaving their fingerprints all over this attack because they wanted to freak us out about what they are capable of. back in februa

this was the largest amphibious operation undertaken by the united states. the united states had never undertaken any kind of operation of this nature. so, today, it is important for our military to understand how did this come off? how do you land 10,000 troops on an enemy beach and capture a fixed fortified position? fort fisher was ill right next to new inlet, which was another 18 miles south of the town. tradeiver could control moving up and down and was the major port for north carolina. washis transit route incredibly important for the confederacy. during the war of there was a 1812, battery here. but nothing was truly built until the south seceded in april 1861. they came down here and started building fort fisher. they built supplies for confederate forces, whether they be civilian or military. this was the primary fort for most blockade runners for confederate goods. when they got into wilmington they could offload their supplies onto trains and they could directly head north to richmond. as these ships approached wilmington or the cape fear area, there were a

the permission those united states. i want to express my appreciation to the leaders in iraq. the united states welcomes this kind of close cooperation with countries in every region of the world. we share our commitment to national security. this revised order will bolster the security of the united states. now, we have spent the morning briefing the congress, the continue to talk with key stakeholders this afternoon. experts from the department of theland security, department of justice and our department hosted a hour-long call with the media on this topic this morning. our collective teams will continue to follow-up with the congress, the media and stakeholders to answer your questions. i will now turn to the attorney general for his comments. thank you mr. secretary. one of the justice department's pop -- top priorities is to protect the united states from threats to our national security. i want to discuss two points. first, the national security basis of this order and second, the department of justice possible in defending the lawful orders of the president of the united states.

the united nations. the woman we are about to hear from is determined to change that. [applause] in january, she gave up her position as governor of south represent the united states at the united nations because she knew she could make a difference. and although she has only been at the u.n. for two months, she is already making her mark. speaking out against the tax on israel and standing on the project edition of past abbasid or is like daniel patrick moynihan and jean kirkpatrick. [applause] less than two weeks ago,

accoutrements, and 1917 right before the united states entered the war, he went to live with his brother who was in connecticut. he got on the last ship out of denmark before the united states entered the war. he was working in connecticut. he took part in the selective service act and was drafted in the united states service. his uniform as the united states soldier is shown here next to his german uniform. he basically ended up near the same place in france he had been as a german soldier two years before. the incredible feeling that he was there serving, he deserted, went to the united states and went back as united states soldier to serve with the american expeditionary services. to have both of these uniforms to survive and become part of the museum collection is a pretty interesting thing to have happened. as i mentioned earlier, the african-americans who served in the 92nd and 93rd, we will take a look at some of their men. equipment.their was thehe most famous 369th infantry regiment. they were known as the fighting rattlesnakes. you can see their shoulder sleeve insignia. they came from the 15th new york national guard and when the u.s. troops were federaliz

. >> please join me and welcoming the asian of that chain and the united states ambassador to the united states and honorable hick nick ao nickeyy anyw-- the honorable un states, nikki haley. [ applause ] >> thank you. >> thank you so much. >> that's amazing. [ applause ] >> ambassador, i think there is a little loop worm, i am not sure what the reception is going thomas hock like. lets pick up where i left off of my introduction of the statement you made following the but until you hear it and you see it, you just can't comprehend how ridiculous it is. [ cheers and applause ] >> so a lot of people here are just getting to know you for the first time. the theme of our conference this year is many voices, one mission, celebrating the diversity of the pro-israel cause. can you talk a little bit about how you started to learn about israel, your affinity for israel? >> well, i am the daughter of indian parents who reminded my brothers, my sisters, and me every day how blessed we were to live in this country. [ applause ] and the truth is i have seen so many similarities between the israeli c

through the transfer of exchange by the bank, the united a -- the united states factory can be paid in dollars when the importer in brazil has only his foreign currency to spend. what do we need to export these tractors? besides the invoices and other documents specified in the shipping instructions, there may have to be an export license by which our government may control the amount and destination of certain goods that leave this country, and a declaration for export for the statistical records of our government. and so, we have seen some of the controls by governments over the exports which leave the country, and over the imports which come into the country. after the transportation, financing, and documents are coordinated, the tractors move onto a train for the first danger of their journey to the buyer in brazil -- stage of their journey to the buyer in brazil. but selling united states goods in another country is only half of the story. in general, the rest of the world can buy from us only to the extent that we buy something from them. let's follow the tractors to brazil and s

we may regard this tractor and it product from you the united -- from the united states, but severalarts came from other countries. where would it be without foreign trade? without tin, rubber? ♪ look around you. you will find many things that go to other countries, that come from other countries. yes, look around you and you will find the importance of foreign trade. ♪ >> next on american history tv's realamerica, round-trip, the usa and world trade. in 1952 encyclopaedia britannica film presented by the 20th century fund. the film features a foreign trade skeptic who sets out to answer his concerns by interviewing workers, a scholar, and industrialists in locations abroad and across the u.s.. this is about 20 minutes. ♪ [machines running]

the united states. special immigrant visa for both iraqis and afghanistan who have helped the united states government has translators and interpretsers at the height of the war in particular. those visas were developed specifically to allow those individuals who have helped the united states to come to the united states because many their lives are in jeopardy in their home country because of that work. there were a number of push and pull factors there. obviously there's great relief from the iraqis, those some trepidation for the rest of the reason and what folks in that region may experience as a result of this order. >> we'll have calls lined up for you. this is kelly, rome, georgia, go ahead. >> caller: yes. thank you for taking my call. i do agree that i'm glad that trump dropped iraq from the ban. i think especially interpreters and everything. i think that was a great move. however, let me just -- a brief story if you'll allow me. i work at the boys and girls club here in my local town and when i teach a ballet class, the -- i allowed the muslim girls to wear their habaj and i'm one of those peop

the united states. those who have helped as translators during the war is at the height of the wars in particular. those vi is sas were developed to allow those individuals who are helped the united states to come to the united states. many, their lives are in di because of that work. there were a number of push and pull factors there. there's great relief from the r iraqis, though some trepidation and what folks in that region may now be experienced as a result of this. >> we'll have calls lined up. this is kelly. independent line. go ahead. >>. >> yes, thank you for taking my call. i do agree that i'm glad trump dropped iraq from the ban. especially interpreters and everything. i think that was a great move, however, let me just a story if you'll allow me. i work at the boys and girls club here in my local town. and when i teach a ballet class, the, i allow the muslim girls to wear their habaj and i'm one of those people as a christian, i wear my cross. however, i was relieved of my position because the muslim people said that it enfringed upon their religious liberties and i was relieved because even though i said nothing about their habaj, they said that me wearing my cross w

targeting us and affects our relationships and the perceptions of turkish people towards the united states and the united states government. there -- therefore we are expecting a better cooperation in that sense because cannot be understood that it is not correct to fight against with one terrorist organization, whereas cooperate with the other. this will mark a big risk and threat for the united states for future. today i shared concerns with my colleague today. we can fight against daesh together. 68 countries came together in washington last week, hosted by mr. tillerson. that 68 countries, as nato, as the old international organization, if we cannot defeat one terrorist organization, if we need another terrorist organization to defeat daesh, then we should all check ourself how capable we are we can do that for the stability of syria, for the future of syria, we, work in very close cooperation with our allies, the united states of america. one of the undecisive policies of the previous u.s. administration was to not to extradite the responsible person who is orchestrating the attempted coup in turkey

the united states where as oil and is dropping by 18%. a measure like this is actually stealing jobs away from the united states, it is making products and in the united states high carbon, that do not have a growing market in other countries. it is reducing the export from the united states and reducing job potential. this should be a concern. more detail on these new policies from donald trump, what he is putting in place, his arguments for it and his critics' arguments against it right now on the bbc website. i wonder if this might be the moment argentina lost its place at the world cup in russia next year? fifa has banned lionel messi from argentina's for world cup qualifier is. he abused the assistant referee during a home game against chile on thursday. it would always be bad news, but particularly now because argentina is having a hard time qualifying. the first time i had the story, i thought for games was harsh because players criticise assistant referees all the time, so what did he say? he used abusive words to the assistant referee. it does look harsh when you look at the faq neil taylor from wales only got one match for his

ford and behalf of the president of the united states it's a high honour to introduce and welcome to dad's name sake aircraft carrier the 45th president of the unitedj trump. cheering and applause thank you. thank you, thank you very much. what an honour. they just thank you, thank you very much. what an honour. theyjust gave me this beautiful jacket. they an honour. theyjust gave me this beautifuljacket. they said, "here, mr president, please take this home." i said, "let me wear it." then they gave me the beautiful had hat. you know i said, "maybe i'll do that. ." hat. you know i said, "maybe i'll do that. we have a "make america great hat." i i have no idea how it looks. this is a great looking hat. this is great looking ship. i'm privileged to stand here today with the incredible men and women of the united states navy. american sailors are the best war fighting sailors anywhere in the world and it's not even close. sueson, i'm so glad you could be with us. i know how hard you work. 17 visits and she wanted things done right. i will tell you. they told me, she wanted this one done right in honour of both of her pa rents done right in honour of

the united states. now he has been president of the united states and he is president of the united states because millions and millions of voters made him that. but there was a belief that maybe he could turn the corner. certainly by a lot of people watching on tuesday night, but as we all said wednesday morning, well, it's fine for now but let's wait and see what tweets come next. what donald trump did on saturday morning has shaken this government and the confidence of its people to the core. it is hard to overstate how reckless that tweet was. the 45th president of the united states accusing the 44th president of the united states personally tapping his phone and calling him sick. for people comparing this to the birther controversy, context is necessary. it is one thing when a reality tv star accuses a president of a sleazy conspir torial authority but when the president of the united states accuses another president, the context changes and it becomes dangerous. mika, "the wall street journal's" lead editorial today is fitting. washington goes nuts. >> yeah. >> is its headline. right off the top, the

south korea, japan and the united states are all united on this. the white house did not respond as quickly to the north korean missiles as japan and south korea. although the state department did release a statement. china has a very different position on this. the terminal high altitude area , china isstem staunchly opposed to it. it has warned the united states and south korea of further retaliation. it's up to tillerson to make clear as the state department that this is not about china. this is a defense system because of north korea. host: this is coming with the chinese president set to come to the united states next month. we don't know exactly when. reports yesterday that he would be coming. this is also supposed to lay the groundwork for that and make sure that it smooth. smooth. to --f tillerson's job is i don't want to say undo some of the damage, but make clear that the leader of china will be welcome in the united states. host: is there any damage to undo in the wake of pulling out of the transpacific partnership and what sort of reacti

the honorable sidney thomas, chief judge of the united states court of appeals for the ninth circuit. the honorable carlos baya, circuit judge for the united states circuit court of appeals, ninth circuit. the honorable alex kosinski. circuit judge to the united states ninth circuit. and professor john eastman of championman university school of law and professor brian fitzpatrick of vanderbilt university school of law. with that, we'll go straight down, starting with you, chief. i think you have to turn your mike on the button in front. >> thank you for the opportunity to testify. my name is sid thomas it's my

the united states. he's cynical about the united states, aggressive towards the united states, he does not wish us well. i always considered him to be an adversary of our country. i think, michael, as you look at this wider story, the real story here is that president trump has been excusing the behavior of vladimir putin. president trump has not criticized putin's annexation of crimea. president trump has mused that we should just lift the sanctions imposed on putin for his grand larceny in crimia. this soft position of president trump contradicts the policy of every american president since truman. that's the core of the substantive problem, the weak policies of president trump towards russia. >> is it fair to say that this would be the most important posting for a russian foreign diplomat, and that for him to be in this position absolutely means he speaks and he acts for vladimir putin? >> i think there's no question about that. for the russians and for most countries around the world to be appointed ambassador to washington is the senior job in that country's diplomatic service. kislyak has had a ve

median wealth for whites in the united states is 13 times greater than median wealth for blacks in the united states and ten times great or for latinos in the united states. this is also true in britain. if you look at unemployment, job status, accommodation, hsdz we have inequality in britain as with so highly unequal societies so i came to this project wanting to know -- how elites make sense of their accomplishments in a highly unequality society and make sense of racial inequality in particular and so, you know, i thought this this would give us clues about how inequality gets perpetuated and social policies get passed that continue to maintain this inequality. and you know in particular when -- inequality is highlighted how do people -- as especially those who are the winners make sense of our ideology of equal opportunity? and i thought this qowld give us clues about kind of how we might think about shifting the way that we think and talk about race and class and achievement more accurately reflect our opportunities structure and the racial realities in our society. so i decided to look

eliminate the defense sequester and to support my request for a great rebuilding of the united states military and the united sates states navy. [cheers and applause] president trump: after years of endless budget cuts that have impaired our defenses, i am calling for one of the largest defense spending increases in history. and by eliminating the sequester and the uncertainty it creates, we will make it easier for the navy to plan for the future and and too control costs, get the best deal for the taxpayer, which of course, is very important, right? got to get a good deal. we don't get a good deal, we are not doing our job. the same boat for less money. the same airplanes for less money. that is what we are doing. that is what we are doing. it means we are going to get more of them and we can use them. our military requires sustained, stable funding to meet the growing needs placed for our defense. right now our aging frontline strike fighters, and many, many aircraft, are likely to be down for maintenance than they are to be up in the sky. our navy is now the smallest it has been since believe it or not, w

research on this, suggesting that right now, the biggest threat in the united states is coming from people who are born in the united states. the majority of isis-related cases in the united states right now are people who are born over here. what this dhs assessment is saying is even with those coming from overseas into the united states, the majority of those are being radicalized several years after they're coming to the united states. and this is not surprising, because isis and al qaeda and all these other jihadi groups are able to reach an audience of radicals here in the united states with their propaganda and able to persuade some of them to try to plff attacks in their name. you have this assessment from dhs that they've pulled from open sources, and you're looking at more sources than anything else, what are you seeing that's happening once folks get into the united states, what's radicalizing them? >> there could be a number of different factors that leads to radicalization. they might be exposed to isis propaganda on the internet. they might be exposed to people in the united states who are already radic

the united they -- states. i want to express my appreciation to the prime minister of iraq for his support in implementing these actions. the united states welcomes this kind of corporation countries in every region of the world who share our commitment to national security. this order will bolster the security of the united dates and her allies. the morning briefing the congress, the press, we will continue to talk with key stakeholders this afternoon. experts from the department of homeland security, department of justice, and the state department hosted a call with the media on this topic this morning. our teams will continue throughout the day to follow up with congress, he did come and stakeholders to answer your questions. i will now turn it to the attorney general for his comments. attorney general sessions: thank you, mr. secretary. and good morning to all of you. department'sstice top priorities is protect the united states from threats to our national security. i want to discuss the national security basis of this order and the department of justice's role in defending the lawful orders of the president of the united sta