is if you are a hollywood studio, and you release your content in one country first, in the united then rollt out over a couple of months in other countries around the world and expect the internet community in all of these different countries to wait for the release. they have just launched netflix here in new zealand. the catalog of content that you can download is roughly 10% of what they offer in the united states. that is completely unfair. and because people do not get that access, they are looking for the stuff elsewhere. so it is a problem created by the content creators. i am not responsible for that. if they would have an offering that has all content globally available for a fair price on any device, piracy would shrink into insignificance. but they are not doing it. emily: but if it is illegal and you are not trying hard enough to take it down or you do not take it down, doesn't that mean what you are doing is illegal too? kim: no. i have tried everything. we were just a small company based in hong kong. we didn't catch up yet with the latest technologies, and we were not even gi

unit. the first of its kind in the state and it's being rolled out in time for the papal visit. >> then coming up on nbc 10 news at 6:00, the secret service tells the nbc 10 investigators the agency is stretched as they work to secure followed. hear what the special agent in charge says about the security plan's biggest weakness. >>> let's take a live look at center city. this is eighth and market streets. expect tourists to flood this area here during the pope's visit this weekend. your immune system doesn't work the way it did when rock was young. so we made fluzone high-dose vaccine... for people 65+. with a high high higher dose of antigen... it's significantly more effective than fluzone vaccine in preventing flu. fluzone high-dose vaccine is approved for people 65 and older. it's not for anyone who's had a severe allergic reaction to any vaccine component, including eggs, egg products, or to a prior dose of any flu vaccine. tell your doctor if you've ever had guillain-barré syndrome. side effects include pain swelling and redness at the injection site; muscle aches, fatigue, headache and

united nations. up next he will visit catholic schoolchildren in harlem. then, to msg, to cap it all off, the mecca of rock 'n rolling about the ambassador, he will join us in just a moment. stay tuned for that. >> and palace intrigue in the nation's capital, john boehner resigning, what happens next? our political panel has some pointed predicts next on count down. awe believe active management can protect capital long term. active management can tap global insights. active management can take calculated risks. active management can seek to outperform. because active investment management isn't reactive. it's active. that's the power of active management. we heard you got a job as a developer!!!!! its official, i work for ge!! what? wow... yeah! okay... guys, i'll be writing a new language for machines so planes, trains, even hospitals can work better. oh! sorry, i was trying to put it away... got it on the cake. so you're going to work on a train? not on a train...on "trains"! you're not gonna develop stuff anymore? no i am... do you know what ge is? (patrick 2) pretty great.ke to be the boss of you? (patrick 1)

rolls around, that will have been two months since the deal was formally submitted to congress. from that moment on the united states and their allies, assuming that this vote cannot be pushed forward, thenll view that deal as valid. but the house is doing, it is fascinating. they'll take some votes tomorrow. one saying, they took one today saying they believe there are signed deals with the iaea. one, whether or not you approve of the deal and the other one saying you want to get any sanctions relief from iran. >> i want to play what john boehner said. the speaker saying the fight is just beginning. let's listen to that. >> all options are on the table. >> one of those options, you said the president broke the law. is one of those options legal action against the administration? >> that is an action that is very possible. >> what might be an option that might bring them together that you've heard of? is there one? >> so the speaker there mentioned in the clip you just played a legal option. from conversations i've had with aides on both sides of the aisle, it is under clear as to what that legal action could be. the legal standing of the house gop says they will have is that they didn't

roll very well. so that was good. i think my biggest disappointment came at the end. in december of 1988, after our election, george bush was then president-elect, gorbachev came to the unitedtions and gave a speech. and i went to this speech and listen carefully. and the hard news that people ran what was he said they were withdrawing 500,000 troops from europe with associate thanks and other equipment. that's big news. but i thought the bigger news, i listen to the speech, was he basically said the cold war is over. the language of the speech was a stunning. and i later read that he thought it was, winston churchill had announced inspect the start of the cold war and the thought he was announcing the end of it. and then we had a luncheon for him over in governors island, and vice president was there and a few other people, and it was a nice event. and i just come from the speech. not that the others had come from the speech. as we are eating president reagan says to me, what's the matter with george? it was obvious he didn't want to be there. and then i read that in brent scowcroft memoir's comp basically this is all a big charade and we should wait and not get involved.

roll for the military. a hard line with others, you are with us or against us. and then we had afghanistan, iraq followed by the united states the patriot act, creation of the department of homeland security, et cetera. part of ct policy is always the question of dealing with hostages and i was much taken by a recent discussion of the background of this policy by rand cooperation's brian jenkins who you all know. his basic thesis is that many people erroneously believe that negotiation was terrorists are prohibited in all circumstances, at least for the u.s. government. but there is no law against negotiating with terrorists, the twisting u.s. no negotiation policy was intended to apply only to hostage situations and even there it was exaggerated. as i said to begin with there is no legislation, no statute in the criminal books, no explicit directive prohibiting negotiations with terrorists. the only guidance is in the form of policy statements that pertain to negotiations. this development began in the early 1970s when terrorists began seizing diplomats and other government officials, professional diplomats resent th