history and the last man was of history and the last man was published in the united states this work published in the united states this work published in the united states this work made fukuyama famous all over the world made fukuyama famous all over the world made fukuyama famous all over the world the philosopher and political scientist the philosopher and political scientist the philosopher and political scientist argued that the spread of western style argued that the spread of western style argued that the spread of western style liberal democracy proves that the liberal democracy proves that the liberal democracy proves that the socio-cultural evolution of humanity has socio-cultural evolution of humanity has socio-cultural evolution of humanity has come to an end no more grand ideological come to an end no more grand ideological come to an end no more grand ideological confrontation global revolution and war confrontation global revolution and war confrontation global revolution and war there will be nothing beyond liberal there will be nothing beyond liberal there will be nothing beyond liberal de

the united states is put before a fact, but to try to draw the united states into where the united statesnot want to be drawn in, and you quite rightly noted the application for ukraine's entry into nato bypassing the stage, and partner of the hr membership action plan and, of course, today's is just an infernal statement zelensky that the west and the united states should launch a preventive nuclear strike on russia. that is, he calls for a global total nuclear war. well, in fact, the problem lies in the fact that such behavior was quite common in the history of international relations, but on the part of the satellites, when the satellites really tried, realizing their own interests, to drag their patrons into the war. ah, and force their patrons, but to realize the interests of the satellites. at the same time, they did not correspond to the interests of the patrons in during the cold war, there were a lot of such situations, and by the way, both moscow and washington then found the political will and wisdom to prevent such escalations and pull their satets in time. but here's another

united states. i face here domestically in the united states.— united states. i am glad you brou:ht united states. you brought this up _ united states. i am glad you brought this up because - united states. i am glad you brought this up because as l united states. i am glad you i brought this up because as you mentioned during the breakfast —— exit campaign there was of great fanfare about this trade deal that would come but never materialised. do you think in practice there is the political will, in america, to make this happen? i will, in america, to make this ha--en? .�* will, in america, to make this ha en? ., �* ~' , happen? i don't think there is the political _ happen? i don't think there is the political will. _ happen? i don't think there is the political will. trade - the political will. trade issues are difficult in the us so i hope we can find accommodation but it is possible not probable. liz truss and _ possible not probable. liz truss and rishi sunak when they were campaigning for leadership one of the big points of controversy was the economic plans and plans around tax cuts. what d

united - the united states. we have an interest in the united states . the united states. states for the united states. we have an i interest in the united states for a stable _ interest in the united states for a stable government, _ interest in the united states for a stable government, a _ interest in the united states for a stable government, a successfull stable government, a successful goveminent— stable government, a successful government and _ stable government, a successful government and i— stable government, a successful government and i have - stable government, a successful government and i have to - stable government, a successful government and i have to say. stable government, a successful government and i have to say i. stable government, a successful- government and i have to say i don't envy the _ government and i have to say i don't envy the situation _ government and i have to say i don't envy the situation she _ government and i have to say i don't envy the situation she inherited, - envy the situation she inherited, and economy— envy the situation sh

states this very vigorously expansive united states united states that keeps coming back to them demanding more and more land and putting more and more pressure on them. and so in the early part of the late 18th early 19th century the united states encourages. cultural social and economic changes in its in its relationships with with native americans cherokees have a reputation historically as being more receptive to those changes. i think in some ways that's that's a server romantic image as well as some of the other images that circulate in american culture. so cherokees tend to for political purposes tend to play up the idea that they have. adopted elements of your american culture and society and economics in response to these these policies are encouraging those changes, but that's clearly an attempt to mollify the united states and to make the case that the united states can leave the cherokee nation alone and so in the public rhetoric you often get cherokee leaders in the early part of the 19th century say, oh, well, you know we've um,

united states. he reviews the armed forces _ and the united states. reviews the armed forces of _ and the united states. he reviews the armed forces of china - and the united states. he reviews the armed forces of china from i and the united states. he reviewsl the armed forces of china from his island _ the armed forces of china from his island stronghold. _ the armed forces of china from his island stronghold. you _ the armed forces of china from his island stronghold. you can- the armed forces of china from his island stronghold. you can act- the armed forces of china from his island stronghold. you can act ever since _ island stronghold. you can act ever since the _ island stronghold. you can act ever since the end — island stronghold. you can act ever since the end of— island stronghold. you can act ever since the end of the _ island stronghold. you can act ever since the end of the civil— island stronghold. you can act ever since the end of the civil war- island stronghold. you can act ever since the end of the civil war in- since the end of the

united states that is being accelerated significantly. the most fundamental danger is the high handedness of the united states and its followers that is destroying the foundation of international stability to maintain hegemonic war. advocated by the united states it's no less than their international order permeated with a hegemonic value. it is also an imperialistic power structure bringing procedures to the interest of the united states of the common interest of humankind international law and the forces -- enforces the obedience of other countries. the united states is now forcing other countries to choose between the two in an attempt to maintain world hedge enemy by expanding the alliance. calling on the united nations as mandated to maintain international peace and security and safeguard the fully discharge of its mission as enshrined in the charter. strictly adhering to the principles of impartiality. the united nations is the most of the international organizations need together the other sovereign countries such that a minority group can never represent the u.n. or the activity as duly oriented to the common interest prosperity of the m

he . had every economist in the united had every economi5t in the united states— had every economi5t in the uniteded states say it was a _ had every economist in the united states say it was a bad _ had every economist in the united states say it was a bad decision i state5 say it was a bad decision because — state5 say it was a bad decision because of— state5 say it was a bad decision because of energy _ state5 say it was a bad decision because of energy crisis, - state5 say it was a bad decision i because of energy crisis, inflation, because _ because of energy crisis, inflation, because of— because of energy crisis, inflation, because of oil— because of energy crisis, inflation, because of oil we _ because of energy crisis, inflation, because of oil we been _ because of energy crisis, inflation, because of oil we been the - because of energy crisis, inflation, i because of oil we been the situation before _ because of oil we been the situation before i_ because of oil we been the situation before ithink— because of oil we been the situation before. i think reagan— because of oil we been the sit

a is the main systemic strategic adversary of the united states because it is china, according to the unitedolitical will to change the world order, and that's just about the world order, as the subject of conflict between the united states and, uh, china, uh. in the same stanford talk, tony linkin was talking. look, from my point of view, china also wants to organize, own a more anti-liberal world order. on the contrary, we are interested in creating a liberal world order , and this is the competition. well, at the same time, in his speech at the twentieth congress back on sunday, when ping made a speech, he stated that china opposes all forms of hegemonism, the cold war mentality, interference in the internal affairs of other countries and double standards, and emphasized that china itself does not will strive for hegemonism said blue ding. and ivan yurievich here. do you think he really wants to? china to build that anti-liberal world order, which the hell is talking about, or the united states is simply judging by itself. it seems to me, yes, we should start with the fact that in general

united states? i in rhode island, but across the united states?— in rhode island, but across the united states? n recovery myself, i know that it is not always up to myself living with this disease when i can go and get better, and wejust this disease when i can go and get better, and we just really want to help sick, dying people. besides that, we hope we can be a model for the country, that our leadership, our elected leaders here that made the bold choice to really legalise this, that other states will follow suit. ., ., , ., suit. you have first-hand understanding _ suit. you have first-hand understanding of - suit. you have first-hand understanding of what i suit. you have first-hand understanding of what it | suit. you have first-hand i understanding of what it is suit. you have first-hand - understanding of what it is like to be an addict, how important is someplace like this where you can be supervised, you can be with other people, in order to monitor what it is that you are doing, in order to avoid those accidental overdoses? yes, i would really say at this point it is really our last

this very vigorously expense of united states. the united states that keeps coming back and demanding more and more land, putting more and more pressure on them. so the early part of the 18th century, early 19, century the united states encourages social, cultural, and economic exchanges with this relationships with native americans. cherokee's have a reputation, historically, as being more receptive to those changes. i think, in some ways, that's a romantic image as well as some of the other images that it's circulated in american culture. turkey's tend to, for political purposes, tend to play up the idea that they have adopted elements of euro american culture in society and economics in response to these policies. but that's clear lee in attempt to mullah fly the united states and to make the case that the united states can leave the cherokee nation alone. in the public rhetoric, you often get cherokee leaders in the early part of the 19th century saying, we've adopted you're agriculture style, we left behind the, hut, the hunt, were not

united states. and already for barrel and olaf-scholz they say that here is a strategic distrust. thus to the uniteded states hear europe last year, when they made the decision to withdraw from afghanistan, they didn’t hear, and so on, yes, that is, many questions arise, and again, europeans understand with their brains that something needs to be done with this then do. will they have the political will to do something here, this is already another question. as for china, well, uh, today's meeting of the european union foreign ministers also concerns china, and here is the eur active portal, with reference to an unofficial document that was sent out, which means that other member countries of the european union informed, that the european union is invited to take a tougher stance towards china yes , and consider china primarily as a competitor, but with limited certain areas of interaction. we also remember that nato is madrid summit of the country. europe, the european nato countries agreed that china is the main strategic challenge proper. and for e nato, sergey gennadievich, here is beijing in be

states and all of the nalo _ against the united states and all of the nato countries _ against the unitedo countries as _ against the united states and all of the nato countries as soon - against the united states and all of the nato countries as soon as - against the united states and all of the nato countries as soon as we . the nato countries as soon as we witness _ the nato countries as soon as we witness the — the nato countries as soon as we witness the launch _ the nato countries as soon as we witness the launch of— the nato countries as soon as we witness the launch of western i witness the launch of western missiles, _ witness the launch of western missiles, ho— witness the launch of western missiles, no matter— witness the launch of western missiles, no matter how- witness the launch of western i missiles, no matter how armed witness the launch of western - missiles, no matter how armed they are. missiles, no matter how armed they are against— missiles, no matter how armed they are against our— missiles, no matter how armed they are. against our territories - missiles, no matter

united states. it has its own ambitions. the unitedin order to destroy isis and the islamic state that has grown up in northeast syria had to dump the arab opposition in syria and signed with the kurdish opposition. and the kurdish forces. because they were the only ones willing to kill the arabs that made up isis. so america jumped, switched horses in the middle of the stream in 2014, 2015 and began to arm the kurds and the largest and most able kurdish organization was the ypg, which turkey considers part of the pkk of this terrorist organization. so turkey got furious at u.s. strategy which was to kill, which was to arm these people and train them because it worried them about the blowback inside turkey itself. so this set these partners against each other. today, there is steep competition because america is helping the kurds and turkey wants them not to. so turkey is increasingly closing ranks with the assad regime in order to try to collectively get rid of the united states and bring the kurdish region back under some kind of con

united states then and now the views of viewed russia. so basically, what i'm arguing is that in 1962, the united states could still afford a compromise with russia. welders compromise was presented to the west and public as a wind for the united states. in fact, it was not images matter. optics matters today i can see no willingness on behalf of the united states to split the difference. and that's a car to know the difference between van and now he also point out in that article that the soviet union was perceived by washington as an equal or worse and the current at western elite. see russia as a 2nd to perhaps even 3rd tier country whose province national promise rests only on nuclear weapons and energy sources. now putting the issue of hierarchy aside. nuclear weapons and energy sources. are they really so little in this day and age? what more do you need? well, i actually borrowed that from one of the pronouncements by president, by. and he basically said, i, you know, i have a, i pity the president of russia because he can only rely on energy sources and nukes, with regard to energy sources of energy exposed, the united states has b

can expect more restrictive measures against china or other countries coming from the united states? yes, the united states is going to continue pursuing what will be increasingly desperate measures they will be increasingly dangerous. and other nations around the world need to think about this, if it's china today, and the united states is able to, to somehow subordinate china. it will be every other nation tomorrow. this is something every nation. keep in mind, every company you keep in mind. now, do you think that the american people are fully aware of this and aware of what's at stake here when it comes to what their government is doing in relation to china right now? it's, it's hard to tell because when, when you look at american internal politics, that means that both sides have done a good job. convincing the american people that china is an enemy simply because it is surpassing the united states. it's very hard to very sad because before all of the started, china and the united states were building a constructive relationship. and now all of that has been thrust aside. yeah, certainly a lot

are on much higher plane compare with if you look at the rate of the pandemic united states, 1000000 people die in the united states because of the fantastic. but charles population is 4 times the speakers united states. so if you have a similar kind of measures in the united states and then there's a risk that china with and these cars in that scenario impact most on the most vulnerable groups, the elderly or the. ready the less privilege, so this is completely a comment on impact that we can all agree on is the impact on the economy. and if i can address the question to you, victor gal, what's been the impact on china's economy? as a result of the 0 clothing policy and will she soften his approach going forward? do you think? well, 1st of all, talk to you about the covalent him pandemic. china has the highest success rating fighting of this panoramic and i agree with mr. lee on, in terms of the death raise infection rates. china has the lowest rates, that means chan has saved more people from infection. so one from this, from the chinese perspective, heard immunity is really an indication of the completely

if you look at the rate of the pandemic united states, $1000000.00 people buy in the united states because of the pandemic, as population is 4 times the speakers united states. so if you adopt the similar kind of measures in the united states and then those, the risk that china would pays for with that. and these cars in that scenario impact most on the most vulnerable groups of the elderly. ready or the, the less privilege. so this is completely unacceptable because one impact that we can all agree on is the impact on the economy. and if i can address the question to you, victor gal, what's been the impact on china's economy as a result of the 0 coven policy? and will she soften his approach going forward? do you think? well, 1st of all, talk you about the call. the 19th pandemic, china has the highest success rating fighting of this panoramic. and i agree with mr. leon in terms of the death raise infection rates. china has the lowest rates. that means china save them all people from infections home from vets, from the chinese perspective. heard immunity is really an indication of the com

i often think in the united states, and particularly and the united states congress, , theres a confusionbetween operational and americanum strategy. we would be a lot more advanced, both the united states and as u.s. allies, in our dealings with the people's republic of china if 95% of the focus was on the clarity and consistency of our operational behavior and its consistency with the coherentre strategy. of deterrence as opposed to what i would describe as this continued rhetorical to track into what we put into strategy about the chinese everyday of the week. ec isermore, if the emphasis on the clarity side resident operational side then you create all sorts of opportunities to cause offense, cultural offense and the rest which frankly clouds out your ability to do with the extensive issues of the day. i have deeply realistic view of how you deal with leninist. those of us who come from social democratic parties like i do by the way for 100 years since the second international in the 1880s we'll dealt with p the problem of communist parties whether in europe or the united states or my

united states states we are a democracy. china is jointly autocratic system that operates but different printing. is more importantly the story back to cut. it's different the united united states is by its extend its intelligently through. if you would huge china has a history of whatever is china considered itself that it was it said sort of to send to both asia without views to to hear the two countries with different it is controlled it the on the basis of the very experience in a entirely new to it will do that and how to manage disagreement the to split without threatening will do with world peace. it will be judged to challenge over a period no no to president to its up for it kind of reelect its its party congress to both of domestic situation in which they have to explain the actions to follow followers of the it should deputies to the other side. it's. very dangerous and very complex situation. now course china has sided with ukraine with russia over ukraine and have that extraordinary meeting with vladimir putin back in february where they signed their agreement. so at this stage, can china manage to avoid violating sanctions, as it apparently has so fa

s. relations are really deteriorating at the united states has not come to terms with the fact that china will soon surpass bag of the united states as far as the size of the carbon is concerned. and the also worried that was travis of policies that are the united states. china will replace the united states as the top dog in the world. childless view is just the opposite channels. economic development will continue. and in less than 10 years time, probably much less than that child size will be economy will be that bigger than that all the divers state, however, china seas no father of becoming the next top dog will know why. because trying to wants to cheat every country, because boy in the world i let me call and child there will never impose it's ways it's views and it's way of doing things on to any other country in the world. well, it's certainly a conversation which has ignited a lot of passion and i appreciate all of you for taking the time to speak with us. unfortunately, we have run short of time so we have to leave it there. but thank you to all of our guests, victor gao, angela young and steven vines, and thank

united states. and i think the overwhelming sentiment in the united states is that this war must be ended diplomatically with legitimate security concerns of both russia and ukraine addressed congress and the united states, frankly, is largely unaware of how overwhelmingly opposed americans are to our involvement in this conflict. and the more that we can get that message across to them, the more i think we have a chance of getting the policy changed. this all comes of political consensus over a ukrainian to strain with midterm elections fast approaching democratic party. congress members have returned to a recent letter urging joe biden to engage with russia in direct peace talks. the chair of the progressive caucus of the us house of representatives called it a mistake, paused show, however, that the american votes is do seem to be unwilling to buy the narrative of unlimited aids ukraine, increasingly challenging politicians. i was a nuclear war when you voted to send a loading dock with my money to your group. i have every right to disrespect you because you're the one of your employees route. 800000

united states. it is cost prohibitive to _ the united states. it _ prohibitive to purchase the cameras. with us developing it in— prohibitive to purchase the cameras. with us developing it in the - prohibitive to purchase the cameras. with us developing it in the uk- prohibitive to purchase the cameras. with us developing it in the uk and i with us developing it in the uk and repair— with us developing it in the uk and repair and — with us developing it in the uk and repairand servicing _ with us developing it in the uk and repair and servicing here, - with us developing it in the uk and repairand servicing here, we- with us developing it in the uk and repair and servicing here, we can l repairand servicing here, we can bring— repairand servicing here, we can bring the — repairand servicing here, we can bring the costs— repairand servicing here, we can bring the costs down _ repairand servicing here, we can bring the costs down and - repairand servicing here, we can bring the costs down and the - repair and servicing here, we can . bring the cost

united states. and particularly in united states congress. there is a confusion between operational and declaratory strategy. um, we would be a lot more advanced both the united states and as us allies in our dealings with the people's republic of china if 95% of the focus was on the clarity and consistency of our behavior and its cont and its and it's consistency with the coherent strategy. of deterrence as opposed to what i would describe as this continued rhetorical attraction to what we put into our declaratory strategy about the chinese on every and every day of the week. furthermore if your emphasis is on the declaratory side rather than the operational side, then you create all sorts of opportunities to cause a fence cultural offense and and the rest which frankly clouds out your ability to deal with the substantive issues of the day. so i have a deeply realist view of how you deal with leninists those of us who come from social democratic parties like i do by the way for a hundred years since the second international in the 1880s, we'v

local revolution, then great britain, france hoped that they will be supported by the united states and the uniteds said, no, this is your problem, after all, these strange members of nato and in nato, nato is a defense alliance. yes , what does it mean that there is an article on collective defense, and an article on collective defense implies the possibility that if something goes wrong with france or great britain, then the united states of america will have to support them in the framework of allied obligations to this, they did not at all strive. and therefore actually. they began to carry out relevant initiatives through the security council and through the general. the emblems managed to pass a resolution that denounced the military actions of israel and france's support for great britain. great britain was the main opponent of the united states of america until the end of world war ii. the empire collapsed precisely after the second world war. in fact, it was during world war ii. uh, the americans got the consent of the british that they were leaving india, and they got permission for free

that in her remarks before the un security council, the representative of the united states, when as far as saying that the united states has no biological weapons program, the united states does not have a biological weapons program. there are no ukrainian biological weapons laboratories supported by the united states. it is widely acknowledged by many voices in mainstream us medium that the pentagon is involved in activities concerning biological weapons. however, we heard the representative of the united states completely flat out, deny that the united states is in any way involved with biological weapons or research involving the use of biological materials and biological agents for military purposes. many countries spoke about why it is very, very important to make sure that biological weapons and weapons of mass destruction are not use. the representative of china emphasized that de escalation and negotiation was the best way to move toward ending the conflict in ukraine, as well as talking about the importance of opposing biological weapons from, from the organ. and she did as a country who suffered immens

the united states must acknowledge the simple fact that ukraine ultimately do whatever the united states wants to do. that's the simple fact for better for worse, that's the way it is. we are not controlled by mr. lensky. mrs. laskey ultimately is controlled by us. so there's no way in the world that the u. s. should be acting on every statement the mrs. lensky makes, and they certainly should not be acting on statements they could lead to rapid escalation and nuclear war. well, let's leave it at that. thank you very much for your time, and congratulations on the book. thank you. and thank you for watching cold to see her again on will the part ah ah ah ah ah, ah oh russia is the gross. no. if injured much about we have any quality for russians. we have actual racism, bigotry, against russians. it's now dangerous to be russian than europe. so bruce, a was possible it a nation suddenly be disliked was the hotel it he always there and only now come to the for.

the united states must acknowledge the simple fact that ukraine ultimately do whatever the united states wants to do. that's the simple fact for better for worse, that's the way it is. we are not controlled by mr. lensky. mrs. laskey ultimately is controlled by us. so there's no way in the world that the u. s. should be acting on every statement as mrs. lensky makes. and they certainly should not be acting on statements. they could lead to rapid escalation and nuclear war. well, let's leave it at that. thank you very much for your time and congratulations on the book. thank you. and thank you for watching cold to see her again on will the part ah ah. so what we've got to do is identify the threats that we have. it's crazy confrontation, let it be in arms. race is on often very dramatic development. only personally, i'm going to resist. i don't see how that strategy will be successful, very critical. i'm time to sit down and talk a midwestern and ukrainian celebrations of the deadly bombing of the crimea bridge. russia slammed the reaction as we're feeling what it called with terrorist na

it is also the united states and russia. when the unitedrew from the intermediate nuclear forms range treaty in 2019, that was the end basically of most of the arms control treaties between the united states and russia. in fact, since 2019, we are living without a security guarantee arrangement between these major nuclear powers. the united states and russia. no wonder there's a bulletin of atomic scientists has brought the doomsday clock to it than 100 seconds of midnight. it began at seven minutes to midnight. we are now at 100 seconds. the reason the bulletin of atomic scientists gives for this is the unilateral withdrawal by the united states from basically the entire architecture of arms control with russia in particular. so there has got to be pressure on the biden administration, not only to back off and allow zelenskyy and putin to talk, to allow them to have some kind of peace agreement that is filled with dignity for all sides, but also the united states needs to go back to the table with the russians and talk to them. if united s

the united states must acknowledge the simple fact that ukraine ultimately do whatever the united states wants to do. that's the simple fact for better for worse, that's the way it is. we are not controlled by mr. lensky. mrs. laskey ultimately is controlled by us. so there's no way in the world that the u. s. should be acting on every statement is mrs. lensky makes, and they certainly should not be acting on statements they could lead to rapid escalation and nuclear war. well, let's leave it at that. thank you very much for your time, and congratulations on the book. thank you. and thank you for watching cold to see her again on will the part ah with mm ah, i mean with, [000:00:00;00] with many in the west and ukraine celebrating the explosion on the crimean bridge. russia slums, the reaction as revealing to quote the terrorist nature of the kiev regime and is nato partners. pavilion areas up the next remain under ukrainian shelling as a local school is hits and the attacks on the store is the shape. the news this week, us lawmakers, slums, saudi arabia, royal back stabbers, following t

you address some of the steps the united states needs to do to shift the trend line in the relationship. some of those things require strengthening the unitedates. how does the united states take steps without then triggering a competitive art adversarial response from china? i personally felt the baby if they never they no longer saw ed as a declining power. >> is a deep and probing questions that you asked. you must always when you post those questions consider the alternative. which is as britain gently slid from it the dominant global position during the first world war into semi retirement into the interwar period and unfortunately that's producing strategic circumstances or others are rising isolationist america still into the 20s and proud of that. then of course the strategic opportunities created for the risese of fascism in europe. oh, il think in terms of the preservation of the international order there is noc under fundamental underpinnings that exist other than the american strategic and economic power. it can be an expanded concept whereby what is the critical mass of the american economic and military reality is augmented by

united states. the instigation of the president of the united states.— instigation of the president of the united stateses. the committee has heard the violence was _ united states. the committee has heard the violence was inflamed l united states. the committee has| heard the violence was inflamed by united states. the committee has i heard the violence was inflamed by a trump tweet accusing his vice president of cowardice for not helping him overturn the election. the impact of that tweet was foreseeable and predictable. it further inflamed the mob and provoke them to even greater violence. the vice president onlyjust escaped the mob and then worked with democrats to get congress reconvened. the committee so donald trump demonstrated he did have control over this violent crowd when he eventually told his supporters to go home. after months of investigation, this committee believes it has shown that what happened on january six was deliberately orchestrated by donald trump himself as he tried illegally to cling onto power. we are illegally to cling onto power. - are obligated to seek answers directly f

the united states must acknowledge the simple fact that ukraine ultimately do whatever the united states wants to do. that's the simple fact for better for worse, that's the way it is. we are not controlled by mr. lensky. mrs. laskey ultimately is controlled by us. so there's no way in the world that the u. s. should be acting on every statement the mrs. lensky makes, and they certainly should not be acting on statements they could lead to rapid escalation and nuclear war. well, let's leave it at that. thank you very much for your time, and congratulations on the book. thank you. and thank you for watching hope to see her again on will the part ah ah, look forward to talking to you all. that technology should work for people. a robot must obey the orders given by human beings, except where such order that conflict with the 1st law show your identification. we should be very careful about artificial intelligence. and the point obviously is to great trust, rather than fear a take on various jobs with artificial intelligence, real summoning with a robot most protective own existence with oh

united states. actually he's wrong because the united states is not producing enough energy to service the european markets. it's facing steep gasoline prices arises and gasoline prices here in the united states. so it needs as much gas for its own populations as well. and also the, the shale revolution of the past 10 to 20 years is now drawing to an end. there will be a diminution of shale oil and gas supplies in the united states. this isn't dwindling. resource and the idea that the united states believes that there's a future in selling and g to the united states as i to, to europe and, and you're not going to be bailed out either by the mythology of us alan g, even at steepest possible price control clearly, clearly, and none of these people thought any of this are, you know, larry and what are future historians are going to think about this. i mean, this is all self inflicted. these are craving choices. these none of this should be happening larry. some airy parallels. if you will, with the 1st world war, because when you look back at the health, the world got drug in europe in particular was d