kingdom and united states is, one. _ the unitedis a reason why people are _ is, one, there is a reason why people are coming to these countries. there is a reason why people _ countries. there is a reason why people come to united states and come _ people come to united states and come to— people come to united states and come to the united kingdom, because they do— come to the united kingdom, because they do not— come to the united kingdom, because they do not feel safe in their own countries — they do not feel safe in their own countries. they are seeking asylum, so instead _ countries. they are seeking asylum, so instead of— countries. they are seeking asylum, so instead of trying to come up with different— so instead of trying to come up with different ways of deporting them, we can go— different ways of deporting them, we can go back to the root problem, of saying _ can go back to the root problem, of saying their — can go back to the root problem, of saying their issues happening in these _ saying their issues happening in th

that's correct, and united states _ united states. ed states is in the _ united states. that's correct, and united states is in the same - united states is in the same predicament, in that some of the information, wear masks, don't, get a vaccine, get boosters, don't get boosters, that confusion to the general public comes as the... the mistrust come from the people. if the whole blanket statement is of everybody quarantine or everyone get vaccinated, everyone get boosters, and yet you're still seeing people get the boosters, get the vaccine, getting covid multiple times, including the president and his wife a macro cannot ask you on that, jennifer? , ., , ,., ., jennifer? lester has pointed that out. politicians _ jennifer? lester has pointed that out. politicians are _ jennifer? lester has pointed that out. politicians are not _ jennifer? lester has pointed that out. politicians are not experts l jennifer? lester has pointed that| out. politicians are not experts on anything, they navy lawyers, like you, the median mechanics who serv

the united states took credit for the internet _ publicly. the uniteddit for the internet and - publicly. the united states tookj credit for the internet and some elected — credit for the internet and some elected city— credit for the internet and some elected city to— credit for the internet and some elected city to be _ credit for the internet and some elected city to be turned - credit for the internet and some elected city to be turned back i credit for the internet and some | elected city to be turned back on last weekend _ elected city to be turned back on last weekend when _ elected city to be turned back on last weekend when the - elected city to be turned back on last weekend when the israelis l last weekend when the israelis turned — last weekend when the israelis turned it— last weekend when the israelis turned it off, _ last weekend when the israelis turned it off, saying _ last weekend when the israelis turned it off, saying that - last weekend when the israelis turned it off, saying that was l last weekend when the israelis - turned it off

well, israel, israel is not is not. really the real power, the real power is the united states, the united states, anytime israel get into any kind of real serious trouble, the united states always come to its rescue with weaponry, with money, with uh uh military intelligence, so the united states, you have here, you have zinonis, central bankers, as you know, in 1948, the the primary force behind the establishment of the zionist state with a roth child banker. the international bankers, they were behind the establishment of of that, today in the united states, these same bankers and others, they are behind the power of the zionist state of israel, so this is used to divide people, they use democracy. now to to more to answer your question more sicinctly is that what what the design state of israel did years and years ago, they saw that the plo was a real real problem for them, so what they did, they did what the united states did, the united states went out there, they established al-qaeda with bin layden and put them against the soviet union, so israelis they went out and they got some p

united kingdom. for one thing, it's notjust about the united states. it's primarily about the united states. ally fundamentally disagree with you. it is not primarily about the united states. this is about european security. we've already had in the united kingdom before the invasion of ukraine, litvinenko of the skripals, you've had all kinds of operating operations going on in the united kingdom, assassinations in the tiergarten in berlin as well. russia has been a bad actor in europe against european security for a very long time here. that really wasn't my point. my point was it was the threat... it's not about where the response sits. yes, but the response doesn'tjust sit in the united states. if europe doesn't care and the united kingdom doesn't care about security, then the response sets the united states and then, yes, putin will prevail because the united states is not going to keep bailing out europe for 100 years. world war one, world war two, that's where the debate is. so if europe doesn't care in the united kingdom doesn't care, then absolutely that is probably going to mean tha

united states". "nato rips off the united states. the united states." absolutely. trump will withhold... ..any kind of us assistance and will not want to be footing the bill for nato and european security and will not want to be giving countries any undue benefit in the trade space. so absolutely take that seriously. he's made a personal point of going after, for example, former chairman of thejoint chiefs mark milley, american general — he's even in the past referred to you as a... ..deep state stiff with a nice accent. this isn't a joke question. no, of course not. do you think if trump came into power again, he would go after people like you? yeah. i don't take it as a joke at all. and i think, again, people will have to ask themselves here and elsewhere, how are they going to interact with the united states, where we have a president who is basically taking revenge against anyone who's crossed him ? he's also got a list of people he doesn't like here in the united kingdom. and, you know, you might recall a previous uk ambassador w

united states is the main instigator and partner in this crime, israel is the illegitimate child of the united states. it is the united states that has preferred supporting the israeli regime to the lives of palestinian children, by holding its emergency security cabinet in the occupied territories, the united states encouraged israel to commit crimes against innocent civilians in gaza and call that legitimate. said the americans are providing israel with billions of dollars to commit crimes against palestinians. the president lashed out at israel saying the regime is using internationally banned white fosphorus bombs and threatening palestinian civilians with nuclear bombs with the aim of committing genocide against them. president raic called for an international embargo on israel and each muslim countries to designate israeli military as a terrorist. group, he said, the regime must be brought to justice in international courts over its crimes against palestinian people. race made the remarks during a joint summit of arab league and the organization of islamic countries in the saudi capital

the united states won't do that. the united states is government, not the people because we've seen tremendous. amount of support in the united states for the palestinian people. the united states government, which is not responsive to to the people united states, is content to watch uh muslims and arabs in gaza be slaughtered, to watch them be killed, to watch israel continue to continue to expand its illegal settlements, right now, as we know, as you mentioned earlier, the there are settler attacks against uh people in the west bank, in addition to the the carpet bombing of the... the gaza strip, this is aparthide, this is genocide, we are watching genocide real time, the united states is financing it, and this is information that the world is finally coming to accept. indeed, as you said, robert, killing muslims, but i want also add, uh, killing christians in the united states calls itself a christian country, we've seen churches devastated, and christians of course have been under impression on the west bank and uh have bee

states. i united states i had to root for the united states.— the united states. would say that. easy - the united states. i did think i you would say that. easy choice for england _ you would say that. easy choice for england is — you would say that. easy choice for england is going _ you would say that. easy choice for england is going into - you would say that. easy choice for england is going into the - for england is going into the final was exciting to be in england at the time. it final was exciting to be in england at the time. it was su ter england at the time. it was super exciting, _ england at the time. it was super exciting, i _ england at the time. it was super exciting, i loved - england at the time. it was super exciting, i loved it. l super exciting, i loved it. jennifer, thank you so much, lovely to talk to you this morning. these are the financial markets, the dollar is down at a three—month low versus most major currencies around the world, versus the yen, hong kong down 2% currently, japan down, a third, the us. this is how the day ended on tue

states, the united states is financing it, the united states is uh giving continuing to give israel cover on the international stage, the reason this is continued is because the united states is allowing it to continue uh israel wants to annex all of palestine uh, it's been slowly doing it for... forly doing that for 75 years, but wants to to hasten that now, accelerate it, and the united states allowing it to happen, the as your the other commentator said moment ago, the people in through the world support palestine, this has been shown in countless demonstrations in major cities around the world with hundreds of thousands of people gathering, but this information or this this resolve to help the people of gaza and people throughout palestine has not filtered up to the governments of these countries, governments of the united states, canada, throughout europe, even the uh the arab nations in the middle east are not lifting finger to assist the palestinians. rather they are further uh hurting them, further causing them harm. this is perp

united states. we look at almost one third of the people of the world are. directly you know uh facing united states wars and germany, sometime it takes an economic forms of war, sie, sanctions, collective punishment, isolating countries that doesn't agree with the united states and the people of the world knows this, they knew it in the all along in the 40s and the 50s in the 60s up until today, what happened is that... in our region something different happened and that is in 1979 a great revolution happened in iran and that changed the entire equation in our region because in 1979 almost we lost the you know egypt who signed a surrender agreement with israel at the hands of the sadad but in 1979 a different alternative path was to be born and that is the revolution in iran, now the camp of resistance in the region is the only hope for our people, and we found ourselves in a direct confrontation with the same enemies since bullford declaration until today, because we haven't, we haven't actually won the war against imperialism and against germany and against. i mean the entire arab world in some w

retired united states navy chief petty officer deborah all shake -- olshig. retired unitedsergeant lee roy peachtree, past president, congressional letter of vinyl -- let her of honor -- medal of honor society. miss nancy espinoza, national commander, disabled american veterans. retired united states air force lieutenant general brian kelly, president and chief executive officer, military officers association of america. commander james gooch, chair, board of directors, commissioned officers association of the united states public health service. mr. keith reed, executive director, air force sergeants association. mr. stephen by south gate, commander, polish legion of american veterans of the united states of america. mr. jeffrey brough door, national president, korean war veterans association of the united states of america. mr. david rodriguez senior, national commander, american g.i. form of the united states. mr. lawrence wolf, national commander, catholic war veterans. mr. donald overton junior, executive director, blinded veterans association. retired united states ar

united states senate. articles of impeachment exhibited by the house of representatives of the united states of america in the name of itself and of the people of the united states of america against alejandro nicholas mayorkas, secretary of homeland security. in maintenance and support of impeachment against him for high crimes and misdemeanors. article 1, rather than adhering to an oath he took to defend and secure our country and uphold the constitution when he was sworn in as secretary of homeland security, alejandro nicholas mayorkas has engaged in a pattern of conduct that is incompatible with the laws of the united states as follows. article 2 of the constitution requires that the executive branch, which today includes the secretary of homeland security, ensure the laws passed by congress and signed into law by the president are faithfully executed. the secure fence act of 2006, public law 109-367 requires that the secretary of homeland security maintain operational control over the entire international land and maritime borders of the united states. in his wiff admittance are border in his willful

united states. our homeland security— don't hear in the united states. . our homeland security secretary, he - homeland security secretary, he could _ homeland security secretary, he could very — homeland security secretary, he could very well _ homeland security secretary, he could very well phase _ homeland security secretary, he i could very well phase impeachment homeland security secretary, he - could very well phase impeachment in our united _ could very well phase impeachment in our united states _ could very well phase impeachment in our united states house _ could very well phase impeachment in our united states house of— our united states house of representatives— our united states house of representatives because l our united states house of| representatives because of our united states house of- representatives because of his vast incompetence _ representatives because of his vast incompetence i_ representatives because of his vast incompetence. i would _ representatives because of his vast incompetence. i would say- representatives because of

on the united states. — with each other. on the united states. it — with each other. mocrat or republican, there is atways— a democrat or republican, there is always some sort of tension or relationship that happens with china that every— relationship that happens with china that every president has seen. this type of— that every president has seen. this type of relationship that is going to he _ type of relationship that is going to be happening with the biden administration and president biden meeting _ administration and president biden meeting with the chinese government officials _ meeting with the chinese government officials is _ meeting with the chinese government officials is something that should be heralded as a step forward, as we said, _ be heralded as a step forward, as we said. not— be heralded as a step forward, as we said, not only economically but militarily, — said, not only economically but militarily, there has been serious tensions. — militarily, there has been serious tensions, notjust with militarily, there has been serious tensions, not just wi

nations, but the united states. the united not just the international community, but let's say from arab governments to put pressure on israel to uh implement a cease fire, to stop the the massacre. and genocide of palestinians in gaza, yes, the united nation, the purpose of establishment of united nations was to create the peace, to to to protect the world from the wars, but unfortunately has been fair and now it, it's become a end of especially the us. english and others, so now in this situation, even antonio gotras speaking, sometime he speaks in the floor about the palestinian issue, but this is this time not for his speaches, this time to take some practical actions, this time demands practical actions of un and international community and international organization, but unfortunately and very very unfortunately. they all are their appropriate role in regarding to stop the gen why united nations general assembly did not put the resolution against the... us, why they are not demanding, demanding from united states governm

africa. now in regards to the the role of the international community and particularly the united states, the united states foreign policy towards palestine and even israel, it will be naive to think that the united states, you know, will take a stand to support the loss of innocent lives in gaza at the moment, or within west bank or even ramala now, because the united states is not an innocent or neutral player in this so-called conflict. in fact, the united states is itself a perpetrator, because they have continued to finance this occupation and even complasen. um with the are very complicit with the level of atrocities, not just now, only that now the number of deaths and just the suspension of all laws that regulate the international legal arena seems to have been suspended on the pretext of what they are calling hunting down and finishing a terrorist organization, but even if it may that they were looking for a terrorist, i assuming that they they were looking for a terrorist within israel, as they want to call it, once a terrorist gets into a hospital or mosk or hospital, then it is over for.

states is not prevailing in ukraine either, the united states did not prevail in vietnam, the united penal responsibility for the war crimes and crimes against humanity that are being committed in our name, and what we need is a ceasfire, what we need is mediation, what we need is is honest dialogue in good faith and not through a tony blair or the united states, the united states is the least credible candidate for the role of mediator. mediator, let's have qatar, let's have the united arab emirates, let's have egypt, let's have bulgaria, let's have india, let's have china, but sir. not the united states. all right sir, thank you, pleasure to have you on this excited conversation. stay safe, mr. alfred the zayat, always a pleasure, lawyer, writer and historian joining us there from geneva. stay safe, sir. meanwhile, an extraordinary and heroic move the enemy armed forces sees an israelly cargo ship in the red sea on sunday in response to the regime's deadly aggression against gaza. a correspondent for iran's arabic news channel al-alam has visited the detained ship in a yemeny port.

united states senate. articles of impeachment exhibited by the house of representatives of the united states of america in the name of itself end of the people of the united states of america against alejandro mayorkas secretary of homeland security and maintenance and in support of its impeachment against him for high crimes and misdemeanors. rather than hearing to an oath he took to defend and secure our country and uphold the constitution when he was sworn in as secretary of homeland security, alejandro mayorkas has engaged in a pattern of conduct that is incompatible with the laws of the united states as follows. article two of the constitution requires that the executive branch with two days includes the secretary of homeland security and ensures the laws passed by congress and signed into law by the president are faithfully executed. the secure fence act of 2006, public law, 109-three 67 requires the secretary maintain operational control over the entire international land and maritime borders of the united states. in his willful admittance of border crossers, terrorists, human traffickers, drugs and

united states. senator, we will have to leave _ united states. senator, we will have to leave it _ united states. - have to leave it there. as always, great to have your bbc news. you can find all the letters on the israel gaza war on our website. we have news and analysis that plus the other lights around the world. that is all that bbcnews.com. be sure to check out our app as well. —— plus highlights from around the world. the rolling stones have reached the top ten in every decade since the 19605. in every decade since the 1960s. happy diamonds entered the charts at number three. the stones extended their record as the band with the most top ten albums of all time, 38 in total, more than barbara streisand, with 3a top ten albums. in the uk, the release of the other has taken the group to number one for the 14th time. pretty impressive. that is all for us here in washington. i am sumi somaskanda. are we back in 30 minutes of the latest. stay with us. hello there. we�*ve got more heavy rain, more strong winds as we head into thursday, all due, of course, to storm ciaran. that�*s been tracking its

this point carefully. and the person who has committed all these crimes is clearly the united states, the criminal united us as the main culprate, and the us is responsible for all these crimes and all these crimes have been committed on the us orders and with the support of the united states, we never actually this wicked statement made by the us president during his first trip after to tel aviv after the operation we will not forget uh when these two evil characters hugged each other they they said that even if the israeli regime wouldn't exist today today we needed to create an israel today. this is the the this is the wickedness, this shows the wickedness and the evil nature of the united states. as he said, the late imamni mentioned more than 60 years ago. on this day, that's what the the late imam said, addressing the us and israel, and today we are telling the united states, you evil united states, which are pulling shinanigans every now and then, stop pulling shinanigans and stop making, and

or or or a politician or senator or congress person in the united states government, so yes, so it is drawing clear lines in the sand, the united states is clearly complicit in genocide, for those that know anything about the history of the united states government, his manifest destiny role of conquering the world of playing some type of role in extrapulating and people um in northern africa confident itself, you know, we understand that this is what's going on. the point i would like to make uh my listeners is that um there is definite role that has to be played with the uh human rights movements and the revolutionary movements inside the united states, so what we have now, we have massive protests, if you're able to follow it, because lot of times the major networks are not following the fact that uh two weekends ago... there is you know close to 200,0 people in the streets of washington dc, these are some of the largest demonstrations in uf in us history, that's really not being covered too much by the news to let you know listening audience that the the people on the ground and the movements in the united states clearly su

protect israel while it commits a genocide, we look at the countries that are involved, the united states, the united kingdom, you have italy, france, germany sending statements. and now i have noted that the french has sent the helicopter carrier to participate in the protection of the zine state as well, so you have this configuration a global scale of the western nations against countries like the the people of lebanon, syria, iraq, the islamic republic of iran, of yemen, and you see this configuration, and that is attracting lot of attention from the global community, what it? has also done is that it has tested the true implementation of human rights, implementation of human rights has been exposed to be for those that are in the western world, it's human rights for the united states, it's human rights for those in europe, but those that are not in europe, those that are perhaps in africa or those in the middle east, no they are viewed as lesser and not entitled to the protections of everyone else, and that is what we are seeing today, the united united states is not going to spread freedom thro

states with many peoplel the united states with many people on the _ the unitedting them because _ on the left not trusting them because of— on the left not trusting them because of institutional- on the left not trusting them i because of institutional racism on the left not trusting them - because of institutional racism in the sense — because of institutional racism in the sense of— because of institutional racism in the sense of real— because of institutional racism in the sense of real bias— because of institutional racism in the sense of real bias and - because of institutional racism in the sense of real bias and manyl the sense of real bias and many people — the sense of real bias and many people on— the sense of real bias and many people on the _ the sense of real bias and many people on the right _ the sense of real bias and many people on the right feeling - the sense of real bias and many people on the right feeling that| the sense of real bias and many- people on the right feeling that law enforcement— people on the right feeling that law enforcement

compromise that should work out two, the most important agreements for the support of the united states, the unitedtes, ukraine and israel. republicans are very dependent on security measures at the border between the united states and. this is an eternal problem, an eternal problem of american security, we remember that talking about this problem and the need to solve it in a big way led to the white house of donald trump, who is still successfully competing for the republican nomination, has a huge chance to to become the republican candidate for president of the united states, and of course, there are supporters of donald trump in the american congress, and among them is the new speaker, michael jordan. are doing everything possible to ensure that the trumpist line wins in american politics, but the question arises: who do they want to make weak in the eyes of the american voter, the republicans who are supporters of the former president of the united states, the current president of the united states, joseph biden, or the united states itself, this is very important question, because it is not

united states. the problem is very much between china and the rest of the world. this is one of the reasons that china has a fixation about the united states, forget all of the other things with the e.u. and its neighbors in the south china sea and other parts of the world. the united states share much can touch much of the concerns about the pattern of behavior so these are the three things conceptually that both sides have to really agree to in order to make the relationship more healthy and move forward. host: both guests joining us. if you want to ask questions it is democrats, 202-748-8000. republicans, 202-748-8001. independents, 202-748-8002. if you want to text us you can at 202-748-8003. you can post on facebook and x. it was yesterday that president biden address the relationship between oath countries and talked about the issues that you brought up. i want to play what you have -- what he had to say and then get your responses. [video clip] pres. biden: we have very -- we have differences when it comes to beijing when it comes to a level playing field and protecting your intellectual property. we will continue to address

states on— he is synced up with the united states on the _ he is synced up with the united the - he is synced up with the united i states on the us, and the broader question— states on the us, and the broader question of— states on the us, and the broader question of china _ states on the us, and the broader question of china and _ states on the us, and the broader| question of china and engagement with china — question of china and engagement with china i— question of china and engagement with china. i think— question of china and engagement with china. | think that— question of china and engagement with china. i think that is- question of china and engagement with china. i think that is a - question of china and engagement with china. i think that is a big - with china. i think that is a big concern, — with china. i think that is a big concern, particularly— with china. i think that is a big concern, particularly with - with china. i think that is a big concern, particularly with the i concern, particularly with the summit— concern, particularly with the summit going _ co

well, the united states is not. not supporting israel, the united states is a full partner in crime withf native americans, are not in any way hastend to support the genocide of palestinians or any other people for that matter, and they have done it previously in other countries, in vietnam, and cambodia, and korea and other countries, so we have to be very clear that this is not a matter of the us putting some red lines, as if they are some sort of... to a coach for the state of israel, the question was wrong, the question should have been asked, one is the united states going to stop committing crimes against humanities, war crimes, violating international law, that's that should have been the question asked to mr. kirby, not the question of whether we will continue to wait to put red lines, that's not what the role of the us is, the role of the us is... not checking israel, the role of the us is basically like the role of head of a crime syndicate, what is its role with the other criminals? sure, same question to mr. barry grossman as well, we had a report earlier, memo leaked to the

united states and these equations. what does he actually talking about there? is he talking about the united states as it is as it's people, and the intro us of its people because of course, the interest of the people of the united states is essential. but that's not what the government is representing. there was no interest for the american people in the united states and fading at all. there was no interest in, in fading upon his son. there was no interest in their dirty work in syria. there was no interest in a overflowing uh, good job in libya and there was no interest for the american people in supplying israel with billions and weapons to blow up $5000.00 plus children and gaza. yeah, yeah, robert, i thought it was interesting that the bite and in his opinion piece said that he's heart broken by the images out of gaza in the depths of the many thousands of civilians including children. but he doesn't call for a cease fire or the end doesn't even acknowledge that it's the is really a tax on does that is causing the suffering and in does uh, what was your thoughts on that as well? it's l

then did the united states to the oregon country. in fact, the united states really held a very weak throughout the 1820s and 1830s. this begins to change, however, in part because ideas about american expansionism really had taken hold by the 1840s, the united states had annexed texas. in the 1840s went to war with mexico for the remainder of mexico's northern holdings. upon the defeat, mexico in 1848, the united takes possession of the lands that would become the american southwest states of of new mexico, arizona, southern california and so on. and moreover national politicians in united states took up western as a key campaign issue. the monroe doctrine, 1823, something you have encountered in other history courses. the monroe doctrine, a position that opposed any europe colonization or involvement by european nations in the western hemisphere and the 1840s. the idea of, manifest destiny has really taken among americans manage destiny. the idea that america had a god given right to settle the continental to expand all the way to the pacific coast an

but we need to go back 30 years ago, if the united states had normally built diplomatic relations with russia, then none of this would have happened if the unitedunited states would respond to president putin’s diplomatic proposals regarding the creation of a new structure. between the us and russia, to stop the expansion of nato, to build diplomatic work on nuclear weapons and so on, the us and russia must begin negotiations, with the understanding that nato will not expand, with the understanding that we will find some solution to the problem ukraine. and now, of course, ukraine is already in a much worse state than it was a year ago, 2 years ago, 5 years ago, but nevertheless, some solution can be found , we need to stop the expansion of nato, we need to resume negotiations on nuclear issues, the threat of nuclear confrontation is becoming more and more urgent, we have practically no agreements left in the field nuclear weapons, there is no papro treaty, no, the united states, because it was they who refused the government of the papro treaty, the inf treaty, and so on, and we need to return to normal relations between russia and europe, and

united states. mr. president, the united states has stood with israel since october 7 and still does. the president powerfully condemned hamas atrocities he flew to israel while israel was under fire, he rushed supplies to the idf and set powerful assets to the tier i rhiannon's proxies americans are working around the clock to secure the release of hundreds of hostages. nevertheless, request by the united states but the israeli leadership conduct a targeted campaign that they permit and provide safe passage for aid as essential to the substance of innocent life that they clearly defined objectives and prevent judicial killings by extremist in the west bank that they present a credible plan for gaza's future governance and have mostly been ignored. mr. president i want israel to succeed both in defeating the threat posed by hamas and as a historic effort to secure a safe homeland for juice. but i do not accept that the total deprivation of millions of innocent civilians is necessary for israel to secure its objectives or in the national interest of the united states and where the unite

united _ thank you. you mentioned people are looking to the united states _ thank you. you mentioned people are looking to the unitedtates to make progress _ looking to the united states to make progress but — looking to the united states to make progress but thus— looking to the united states to make progress but thus far _ looking to the united states to make progress but thus far we _ looking to the united states to make progress but thus far we have - looking to the united states to make progress but thus far we have seen l progress but thus far we have seen little concrete _ progress but thus far we have seen little concrete apparent _ progress but thus far we have seen little concrete apparent progress . progress but thus far we have seenl little concrete apparent progress on a lot little concrete apparent progress on a tot of— little concrete apparent progress on a tot of the — little concrete apparent progress on a lot of the issues _ little concrete apparent progress on a lot of the issues as _ little concrete apparent progress on a lot of the issues as israel- a lot of the issues as israel continues— a lot

in addition, secretary of state antony blinken named senior official in august a multilateral security partnership among australia, united kingdom and united states. it is this role that will be the focus of the discussion. this is essential to the mission of developing sustainable nonpartisan strategies to address security challenges united states and the world. support for u.s. leadership in cooperation allies and partners and dedication to the next generation of leaders. with this in mind, it's only natural goes for discussion since the establishment and u.s. leadership in cooperation with allies. we look forward on my think the strategies in the partnership. it's especially important given international security environment we face and particularly in the indo pacific region. united states and friends and allies challenges for the first time contents with to nuclear competitors, russia and china along with north korea. as we face russian aggression in europe against ukraine and conflict in the middle east, the indo pacific region are growing. probably proving military capabilities while escalating threats for taiwan and u.s. and allies

united states. and xijinping saying the there in the united states. g the planet must be big enough to have the superpowers coexist. emphasising the need for more communication to avoid conflict, he said which would have devastating consequences for many. the united states and for many. the united states and for china as well. in terms of any major breakthrough, advocates fair to say there probably won't be any. we know both sides of agreed to talk once again when it comes to climate change going into this. just the fact that they're sitting down i think is being seen as significant. perhaps we could see the areas for potential collaboration when it comes to military communication. for reestablishing that all—important for having a forum about al, particularly its limits in terms of integration we talk about nuclear weaponry and how that would be deployed. and a issue of particular significance in the day—to—day lives everywhere is sent at all. such a big killer of young people in this country. limiting, exporting where it makes its way into the united

china is part of the nuclear triangle between north korea and the united states. the uniteds actively involved in the affairs of the european continent, which has its own nuclear powers, including russia. everything is very interconnected, so any, even small shock in some part of this global nuclear system can destroy it all. the system then exists somewhere outside and autonomously, these are nuclear weapons that are part of it and will serve more international interest than the exclusion of a number of countries. nobody wants to open pandora’s box to initiate amendments, because this will entail additional requirements and obligations , and reaching consensus is extremely difficult. i think a solution to the problem could be an additional prince protocol, which would give some kind of affiliated status to the four nuclear states outside the framework. even earlier, it would be possible to begin to expand the international nuclear dialogue; contacts are being conducted between russia and the united states, the united states and china , but ideally , broader discussions shou

united states? so, there is genuine concern _ the united states? sells - the united states? so, there is i genuine concern in russells about that, the fact that the us, that us support for ukraine could falter. on the one hand because they are so consumed with the conflict in the middle east, and on the other hand as you mentioned catherine because the us congress has been unable, so far, to agree on the next aid package for kyiv. so, antony blinken, who is here at the meeting, is probably going to use this meeting to reassure allies that america can handle both wars at the same time. now, there has been a lot of talk about ukraine fatigue, but what nato is saying is that their support for kyiv is unwavering, and they are continuing to support ukraine by providing military aid and a wide—ranging of weapons, those weapons include drones, cruise missiles from france and the uk, extra money that has just been pledged by the netherlands and germany, and munition coming from the us and finland and also what nato members have been saying is that they have

the united states has no - economic tsar, mr he. tie: unitedtes has no desire economic tsar, mr he. tte: united states has no desire to decouple from china. a full separation of our economies would be economically disastrous for both of our countries and for the world. we seek a healthy economic relationship with china that benefits both countries over time. . ., , . ., benefits both countries over time. , ., ., time. her comments come ahead of a potential— time. her comments come ahead of a potential meeting _ time. her comments come ahead of a potential meeting between l of a potential meeting between presidentjoe biden and xi jinping next week. since the leaders of the world's two most powerful nations last met in bali, a lot has changed despite us restrictions on high—tech products of the last few months, us china relations have actually improved. both sides are keen to find more ways to cooperate on economic issues. translation:— cooperate on economic issues. translation: ., ~ ., translation: thank you, madam secreta , translation: thank y

european project and and particularly of two states um the united kingdom uh is if you like the the mother of the state of israel the illegitimate child uh and the unit the united states is the father so the uk they they are if you like the the unholy trinity that uh that that is waging the... war against the palestinians, um, they've never been a neutral arbiter in trying to resolve this debate, this this sorry, this uh, this horrific occupation and war, and uh, the world can see that now, and the reality is, unless the united states leaves the region of the middle east, there'll be no peace, and uh, as long as the united states is backing israel, in with weapons, with aid, um, with all kinds of other technological support, with its warships in the region uh, and you know, diplomatic support, political support, then israel will continue uh, also the the you know blocking of resolutions at the un, then it's a green light to israel uh to to do exactly what it wants. in the region and achieve its objects, so the real the reality is um the palestinians are not just struggling against israel, they are struggling against the united kingdom and also the un

united states. bill half of all abortions in the united states.— half of all abortions in the united states. ll the more interesting, in ohio - united states. all the more| interesting, in ohio tonight, they are voting to enshrine abortion rights in the constitution was still an important topic for many americans. really good to have you on the show, thank you so much forjoining us was interesting. as you said, a lot of great cases coming up to follow as well. amy howe from the scotus log, thanks for joining us. stay with us here on bbc news. more on the election results here in the us as we watch those key races in virginia where both chambers of the state legislature are up for grabs. in mississippi as well where voters will over the next key governor but the key races we can call that have been confirmed in kentucky, the democrat governor andy beshear holding onto his seat there and as we just mentioned in holding onto his seat there and as wejust mentioned in ohio, voters there voting to enshrine abortion lights in the state's constitution. more on that in the next show. thank you for wat

still in the united states were a chinese - microsoft. still in the uniteds were a chinese fast l microsoft. still in the united. states were a chinese fast via giant has reportedly filed for an ipo. a chinese carmaker also started the process to sell shares in america but it wasn't long between tensions made chinese share sales in the us impossible. last year diddy was forced off the new york stock exchange last year but that is now changing according to the blue shirt group which advises as nurses on how to list in the us and china.— us and china. interestingly there has _ us and china. interestingly there has been _ us and china. interestingly there has been a _ us and china. interestingly there has been a flood - us and china. interestingly there has been a flood of. there has been a flood of chinese companies that are enlisting in the us and they have been relatively invisible because it is has been very small companies. i would say companies with 100 million and other market capital raising five, ten, $20 million, most people don't that over a0 compani