directive to secretary matus that quote, to pursue peace through strength shall be the policy of the unitedstates to rebuild the united states armed forces . however, early reports indicate the administration plan is to offer a budget of $603 billion as the base for defense in fiscal year 2018. i agree with general store mary that a three percent increase about president obama's budget request from last year is not enough. while we cannot repair all the damage done as a result of sequestration in a single year, we can and should do more than this level of funding will provide. for national security reasons, we cannot afford to wait until 2019 to begin the process to rebuild our military. working with the administration to increase the fiscal year 2018 budget to get as close to possible to the 640 billion number referenced in chairman thornberry's views and estimates letter that was sent to the budget committee. before we begin, i would like to turn to my colleague from massachusetts for any comments that you might want to make. >> thank you mister chairman. and good morning and welcome general th

the location of the boy in regards to being shot from the unitedstates , should not with hesitation. >> you want me to put in my notes the location of the boy is irrelevant to this case, that's what we're going to put in our opinion. >> we start in your opinion that if all the conduct happens inside the united states, and there is a close proximity cross-border shooting in the fourth amendment constraints on deadly force applies? to hold otherwise justice kennedy is to prevent bivins in the areas of the border whether it's south or north of the line because if national security and foreign relations is affected 30 feet across the line and officers in the sameplace and shoot sergio's friend next to him , then you have one bivins case and one non-áuntran7á case. >> when i write the region, the opinion just as you said and it says it's only 30 feet away, the action applies. but if it's 30 miles away, or 300 miles, they don't. okay? so the next sentence is asked have the reason why i drew that distinction. that's what i think people have been looking for so please, if anything else you h

one on harvard, i didn't have the one on brown campus and one of my students interviewed in the unitedstates. in britain it was a little more tricky because of class . so the way you speak in the uk, that identifies your class. pretty clearly and even i as an american when i lived there, i could kind of tell someone's accent, where they came from. >> and not always to some extent. >> i happen to get around that and i can't claim this was, i was lucky so i talked to a colleague in oxford and she recommended a doctoral student who happens to be from western europe. and she was a, an officer and i did, i was a little nervous about that. at the end, it worked out well because she signaled this kind of silliness through her oxford student for being from western europe but she also obviously didn't have a class, she had no class in her voice so she had a foreign accent. and i think that in the end, after the research i felt like in the uk it would've mattered less because students that achieve at all the interviews in britain, that students said things that i wouldn't have expected they would say