no existing unit can be demolished until a constitutional amendmenting unit -- a corresponding unit is available. nobody is required to relocate to an undisclosed location or building. they are allowed to stay in their units until a replacement unit is provided. period. that replacement unit must have the same bathroom and bedroom count, similar storage area based on averages. compam exact same lease and exact same lease terms including the rent. the only difference is the location of the premises. new and old provisions are prohibited. this and any future developer cannot pass prohibited. this and any future developer cannot pass on the future of the community developments. it is prohibited under section four. the old pass-throughs that applied are eliminated as well. new amenities are provided. the same parking rights and rent, although not necessarily the same location. i do want to point out in response to concerns raised by 10ant advocates, we have added a provision that allows any 10ant that feels they have been inconvenienced by the relocation of their parking space a right to p

else, if the united states wants, uh, stimulus contributions, if the united states wants debt reduction, if the united states wants any of those other aspects, can it get any of those answers from brussels? >> not now, no. >> you can't get any of those answers from brussels, that's my point. you have to go to berlin on some issues, all the ones you mentioned, in fact, to get anything done. you go to brussels on some other issues like trade policy, but even on trade policy, if you look at the last couple rounds of multilateral trade negotiations, the uruguay round, the tokyo round before, these, you know, years, they take years to get done. in the end, the deal was germany and the united states getting agreement among all the other e.u. countries to make the final deal. it was german, germany that made the influence, tipped the balance, to get the deal done, because it's a free trading nation, like the united states, and it had to use its weight within e.u. councils. that was to u.s. interests but it was only because we had a strong bilateral relationship that got the multilateral thing

control units, but rent control units are not needs tested. that is, you can be a high-income individual and be lucky enough to be in a rent-controlled unit. that is not an opinion, that's just fact. i'm not saying it is good or bad. however what we do have in the mayor's office of housing are a series of programs that target new housing specifically for low-income housing and individuals. this project at a minimum will provide 271 permanently affordable below market units and up to $229 million in fees to fund permanently affordable housing in the city and county of san francisco. no small contribution. there is flexibility to increase the number of m.r. units on site or to build them off site. this is an important point. for those of you on the commission. this project would contribute to the city's you broader general plan goal of building affordable housing city-wide. finally a few points about the economic vie bit of this. we heard comments in the press, i heard comments in hearings about the i.r.r., the internal rate of return. some indi

there will be 435 units. to under 50 and is to replace the existing units. then the new units. the exclusionary is 5% of the market rate projects. there are no offset payment options. there is 60% for rental. we studied up to 8000 units in the eir. we are building about 7500 units. if we build the maximum units, this would be affordable. we work with the redevelopment agency to identify housing sites to the affordable housing projects. these can change but they also require the approval to change these. the funding for the affordable use of it -- units are coming from a couple of sources. there is some tax credit funding which we will obviously take advantage of. this will be used directly for housing on the island. then there is a developer subsidy of 75 and a dollars for the market rate unit. the transition housing program, we have talked a lot about this with the existing residents as well as the board of supervisors. but there are existing residents on treasure island. there are about 2000 residents. they set of principles when they approved the resolution for us to come up

nine units. conversion of rental stock in market and octavia represents about 7% of the citywide total. in absolute numbers, there were 227 units converted into condos. as far as evictions are concerned, about 70 were for withdrawal, which tends to be a precursor to a condo conversion, 23 were for owner move then, but the ball or for other reasons. -- but the bulk were for other reasons. the report also covers matters related to transportation and parking. 42% of the residence in market octavia use public transit to get to work. this compares very well city- wide. another 12% of the market and octavia plan residents walk to work, and almost 5% bike to work. citywide, the numbers are 9% and 2% respectively. the market octavia plan also limits the market curb cuts in the area on specific street frontage is. a limited survey was done by staff, locating existing curb cuts. future curb cuts are prohibited. a parking space inventory was conducted by mta, and this was snapped. about

there is a 12 unit. there is a seven unit. as you can see, 1280 lombard is 13 units. that is the next-door building. there is a little bit of misinformation there. thank you, commissioners. president olague: thank you. >> my name is lou. this building fits the neighborhood. the design makes it appear to be two stories over the garage in the front, so the appearance of the facade was kept in line with the whole block. the third story was set back. thank you. the third story was set back 15 feet at the front and cannot be seen from the street at all. the rear of the building is stepped down the hill to give visual relief to the neighbors in the rear. it also provides great outdoor space for tenants. the design is a clean, classical look with a level of detail that does not call attention to itself. it blends with the neighborhood. the placement of the stairs and elevators are not arbitrary. besides being a great design, this project will create jobs that are desperately needed in the city. please allow this project to proceed. >> good evening. i support the project. a l

i think the united states can be a huge part of that. and in doing so, it will strengthen our position on energy, which everybody mentions, um, but in also a lot of other areas, in human rights, in civil liberties and also in just, in settling a lot of disputes. >> we, we don't have the presence there that we do, say, in georgia or, um, or other former soviet states. i think the u.s. relationship with, with azerbaijan is much more tenuous than others in the region. >> oil in particular is a very fungible product. oil from azerbaijan is not that much different than oil from nigeria or oil from venezuela, and it's the total pool of oil. and even if the oil from azerbaijan is maybe feeding mostly into western europe, it's still important to us because if they don't have access to that oil, they're going to be looking to gain oil from sources that are primary sources to american energy needs. >> our crisis of confidence, you know, our political correctness in many ways, um, has, it reflects on the world, especially in new countries that look

the united states, similar nation. the president is the end product of that, that at times can lead but he leaves that's what is going to the place where we are going anyway. and obama is perhaps -- >> host: are certainly the limits of rhetoric. there's no question about that. >> guest: he turns rhetoric into many, many volumes of position papers and policy papers. is a central assumption i think at the beginning was that u.s. german relations could have been whether were 20 years ago, had it not been for the unilateralism of george w. bush. the difference in perception was like this. obama's position was i will be a much more pleasant person, and, therefore, the germans will do much more to help me. the german position was thank god we find have a president who will not ask us to do things we don't want to do. they had this tremendous love affair, the nobel peace prize and everything else and suddenly you realize my goodness barack obama is an american president. and angela merkel is the german chancellor. >> host: i

the arms are bought in the united states. the consumers are in the united states. once the drugs cross the boarder where do they go? who consumes them who are the north american capitalists? we don't know about that. we nomex can criminals. we don't know anything about u.s. laundering of money. >> rose: what do you mean by "u.s. laundering of money"? >> things are laundered in this country. once we cross the border what happens? we don't know where the drugs go how they... the money is laundered. drug money is laundered, the consumption,s where it? >> rose: so what are you suggesting? >> i'm suggesting mexico and the united states come together and decide on a common policy to fight this this is a problem that is not unilateral or bilateral. it has become a global problem. i'm part of a group headed by the former presidents of colombia and mexico in which we propose starting to think about a world of legalized drugs. >> rose: legalized drugs or legalized... >> yeah. the consumption of drugs can be legalized, not penalized. for example drug takers should not be sent

building for that unit. this isn't 60 days before a demolition, it is 60 days while that new construction is undergoing construction. you have good notice that the building that ultimately you can choose to relocate to is under construction. finally, when a une -- when a unit is ready, up to six months before first certificate of occupancy is issued, the developer is required to notice the 10ants and the rent board. the rent board is subject to all these notices, that an anticipated relocation date and every existing 10ant's rank, knew marke cal seniority -- numerical soon yorte. and to tour the construction site as safety permits. 10ants are asked to rank within 20 -- tenans -- tenants are asked to rank the buildings. you rank all those available units by your preference. after that, notice is spent to en-- tenants. tenants may accept or ye reject. the 10 ynt is allowed to move 30 to 60 days after that notice. one other important point to emphasize. one year to six months prior to a building's completion in

did you meet with the list members have begun to unite hundred figuring no well mohamed el baradei the former international atomic energy agency chief is well known internationally but those low profile at home loves being a rule says here the captain says he'll be the man to take the place of president hosni mubarak's if his only. where is the matter ukraine's prime minister's warders the search for a show up to sit through his nose is not being seen in public for six months. down the danish court has a quitter the free speech on service was charged with racist. critical comments made about islamic laws how to god sent the message granted that had an heiress dominated by islam a culture more often although i suspect his remains a wonder and a muslim. right now pay to live on his gas debate how effective it is to export only in this democracy to achieve one country's dear political interests call stalkers up. if you can. follow me and welcome to cross talk i'm peter lavelle is outside democracy promotion an oxymoron what is america's track record in the arab world and is invoking secur

it is a four-unit building. the developer which is to give every people -- every person access to the rooftop. this significantly increases the height of the overall building. i do not understand why it is that a structure needs to be built such that it would allow all four units within that building access to the rooftop. >> there are no more speaker cards. >> hello, commissioners. i lived four houses up from the proposed development. i was not going to say this. we would not be here on less the cottage was demolished. i spoke to the woman who lives here. her name is michelle. she had said, and she states in writing as part of the record, prior to the cottage being demolished, we had a severe letdown that lasted several days. upon looking, i sought that this was rushing out to the cottage on lombard. there were holes in the roof. i would like to make this part of the record. that is why the cottage is not there now. if there were holes in the roof, i wonder if he put them there when he sold them. i wonder what

people would not get a you -- a new unit and in no units would be demolished until new units were built. where would that be in relation to the people who would be moved? >> quite don't have a detailed map but i can tell you that the terms of the agreement which are worth repeating, no unit can be demolished until a replacement unit is available with a certificate of occupancy. the terms of the agreement, in no event can any be demolished and the tenet forced to relocate. that has been the principal on the project site. in the only physical areas where there is room to build without demolishing, you are correct. you need to build space for the first few buildings. there is the phasing plan that begins in the west corner of the site. buildings could be constructed without demolishing existing units. >> i think you said there could be three stages or 15 smaller stages. can you talk about the length of term? the reason i gave those extremes because i thought it would be helpful that the developments would play out there are over 7002 units -- 7200 units. and i don't have the precise number

and we are seeing many of those in the united states. for example, if you look at public sector compensation in the united states, for -- since 1980, it has been much higher than the average private sector compensation. this is quite surprising to people like me who looks to the united states as sort of a home to entrepreneurs in the private sector. but beyond that, already 45% of americans don't pay federal taxes. a lot of the issues we are hearing around things like health care and entitlements, which has been a big issue, in wisconsin, pension reform and pension liabilities, i think all of that together, the united states is leaning on the public sector than traditionally we have known. tavis: your comment about public sector notwithstanding, i don't know how one can make the argument when you look at the numbers of the gap, the growing gap over these years between the pay of c.e.o.'s and the heads of companies and the workers in those companies. beating up on the public sector is the easy thing, but the private sector, the gap betwee

states and europe, especially in the united kingdom.for more than 30 years, the saudi's domestic establishment, which controls education, social policy and missionary work as pro-western muslims to the kingdom for theological training. they returned to the west to preach what can only be described as a martial oriented imperialism prohibition of the world is holy islamic and which for the west would mean that christian and jewish populations could convert it said subordination to islam or face elimination. the saudi trained creatures are prominent in mosques and in the united states and europe and have secured positions as chaplains and western universe these come up prison systems the military spirit this is not to say, let me stress, solid american or european muslim communities share the martial expansion orientation, but it's very much to say the saudi trained clerics have teamed enough positions in the west and have enough access to muslim youth through multiple media vehicles to have a growing impact. they are now influencing some

else, if the united states wants, uh, stimulus contributions, if the united states wants debt reduction, if the united states wants any of those other aspects, can it get any of those answers from brussels? >> not now, no. >> you can't get any of those answers from brussels, that's my point. you have to go to berlin on some issues, all the ones you mentioned, in fact, to get anything done. you go to brussels on some other issues like trade policy, but even on trade policy, if you look at the last couple rounds of multilateral trade negotiations, the uruguay round, the tokyo round before, these, you know, years, they take years to get done. in the end, the deal was germany and the united states getting agreement among all the other e.u. countries to make the final deal. it was german, germany that made the influence, tipped the balance, to get the deal done, because it's a free trading nation, like the united states, and it had to use its weight within e.u. councils. that was to u.s. interests but it was only because we had a strong bilateral relationship that got the multilateral thing

russia is not the united states and is never going to resemble the united states for geographic and other reasons. the russian empire in the soviet union were not accidental. they balanced regions with a mutual dependence. the vision of the liberals in russia and in the united states was that falling the soviet union was reorienting themselves towards europe and the united states. they failed to understand that these countries could not compete in any reasonable timeframe in europe. the more dependent they were on europe, the weaker they became, and also forgot that russia is a geopolitical entity. it experienced some terrible wars in its history, and it's extremely cautious about the expansion of things like nato. they regard nato as a military alliance, and we regard it as a club of nice people. it's a mismatch of what it is, and as the united states moved into the baltics and the revolution of ukraine took off and the united states became influ enissue in asia. if containment won after world war ii, pudin from the kgb saw a second engagement. they stopped trying to do what stalin did t

with the exception of the timeshare units. we believe that we might have difficulty selling all the time shares on a list. the reason for that is that in the last auction we had 13 offered for sale and only one was sold at a minimum bid amount. we did not receive bids for the other 12. leading us to believe that the minimum bid amount may be equal to the fair market value. supervisor mirkarimi: ok. i am looking at the -- give me an example of the minimum bid for a time share. >> the minimum bid, for example, if you look at item 37, it is $1,630 on the left column. supervisor mirkarimi: that is nothing. if these are going out at a minimum bid. >> the fair market value of the time share, some of them have very low fair market value. depending on the size of the unit and the location of the building. we anticipate only a small portion of the time share in one building we have had problems selling. supervisor mirkarimi: which building is that? knob hill inn on 1000 pine street. the rest of them are located in the heart of downtown

the united users. five billion in by the way want to cut off billions in economic aid the answer would be no so it's really a red herring this question about whether the united states is involved we're involved that's a reality we have to deal with that the question is how do we shape that involvement so that we do i do not. want to let you know solutions i do wonder how we hung over this is trying to undermine their leadership positions nobody is trying to undermine the leadership of the united states and the fact that they have their own interests every country has a right to have interest and to defend those interests but what the united states have been doing in egypt is not defending interests as in any other it has been foreign intervention they have this table lies egypt they have co-opted the egyptians they have neutralized egypt egypt has not been allowed to be a sovereign country for three days. kates and this has got to end the egyptian people are making it very clear that we are reclaiming

going to come in is going to go ahead right the united states is in trying to define what a credible democratic outcome is in egypt you've missed stated the issue what we are trying to do is. paper article that ends up being the president of the united states i am not i'm not this is not my interpretation it is the president of the united states we really don't have to go ahead i wouldn't worry about whether the obama administration or president obama is going to be too interventionist that's the wrong question in fact quite the opposite president obama went to west point two thousand and nine and he told the west point cadets he told the united states he told the world the country i'm most interested in building in building is my own so. he really would prefer not to deal with the rest of the world he really would prefer not to deal with egypt at all but the reality is as you mentioned we work very closely with the egyptian military where we work very closely with some egyptian civil society elements united states is a world leader whether we care to admit that it or not so the real

units for low income. the amount of units is tremendous. it equals roughly 60% of the housing growth will have to hit over the next 25 years or so. when you look at the production rate from 99 to 06, what stood up to us is that if you project that ford from 2010 to 2035, we come out to about a 17,500 unit shortfall in party district areas. the thing that is problematic. i think somebody stated earlier. if this is based upon projections, and this was the time when we had the largest and fastest rate of growth in the city, in which you're able to capture a lot of value from market rate development -- but it really shows is that even if we tax market redevelopment, we are not going to hit affordable numbers. i think that is a scary thing for us. lastly, i want to quickly show the numbers. if you monetize that gap, what it comes out to on an annual basis is roughly $245 million in priority development areas, and about $300 million city- wide. the numbers are roughly 7 billion, based on numbers i got from staff

when the united states and when the united states fights the war in afghanistan and iraq, it does the same thing. it borrows money to fuel this, this contest. there is an economic stimulus that comes from spending on the wars in iraq and afghanistan. now, it's not as direct and great as it was in the 1940s because much of it is spent in other countries and doesn't find it way back to the united states. but there is another element that is probably more central, and that is when the united states borrows money today, instead of borrowing money from future american generations, it borrows money from foreign countries. and if you're simply borrowing from future generations, it's a debt, as was often said, we owe ourselves. yeah, one generation owes another, but it gives no foreign country any particular leverage, or to put it another way, by and large the interest of the creditors and the interest of the debtors align if they're all american. but if creditors are the bank of japan and the bank of china and other sovereign wealth funds, then it's unclear that the interest of the creditors

russia is not the united states and is never going to represent the united states for geographic and other reasons. the russian empire and soviet union more not accidental and bound together economically and politically regions that have a mutual dependence. the visions of the liberals in russia and the united states was that the soviet union was reoriented itself towards europe and the united states. if they fail to understand these countries could not compete at any reasonable time frame in europe. the more dependent they became one europe the weaker they became. and also forgot that russia is a geopolitical entry. its experience some terrible war in its history and it's extremely cautious about the expansion of things like nato. re nato as a military alliance. we regard it as a club of nice people. fairly mismatched about what it is and it is the united states moved into the baltics and nato has the orange revolution of ukraine to cough and the united states became very influential to central asia they saw the second the encirclement taking place, so if the containment one it was

the gnf did an international survey and asked people in the united states what portion of the united states population is foreign-born. they said about one third. that is double the actual percentage and the set what proportion of >> they said about half. i said, boy, they don't know what they're talking about; right? you know? then the commentator at national press club made a very interesting point. he said they may not be knowledgeable, but maybe they are wise, but a third of the u.s. population is foreign-born and their children. what do you mean by immigrant? at least half of those who arrived in the last decade are unauthorized. there's a number of unauthorized migrants exceed legal migration for a good part of the last decade. how much more do we need to educate in what way? i think from my presentation what i'd like the public to understand is that there's a tradeoff between numbers and quality and setting incentive structures is a very difficult thing. possibly, and there may be a few here who agree with me, congress should be less involved in doing things but have a model l

states supported mubarak the united states supported benelli in tunisia the united states in recent years supported in many ways moammar gadhafi and i think you know one of the problems now is that the governments the people who come to power as we've seen i mean in tunisia where the french ambassador just heckled out of. it was just heckled first for statements that he made because people remember who was on their side i mean one of the reasons actually that moammar gadhafi retains for instance the friendship of south africa is that he supported the south african freedom struggle where many people in the west did not and i think it's always better in the long run to be on the right side of history to be on the people side mark go ahead go ahead finish up go ahead just in terms of the war on terror i mean the way the war on terror was fought has actually you know created many more terrorists then than there were to begin with i mean throughout the middle east kuantan imo abu ghraib are symbols that are recruiting tools for terrorism and it's clear that in the words of donald rumsfel

no existing unit can be demolished until a constitutional amendmenting unit -- a corresponding unit is available. nobody is required to relocate to an undisclosed location or building. they are allowed to stay in their units until a replacement unit is provided. period. that replacement unit must have the same bathroom and bedroom count, similar storage area based on averages. compam exact same lease and exact same lease terms including the rent. the only difference is the location of the premises. new and old provisions are prohibited. this and any future developer cannot pass prohibited. this and any future developer cannot pass on tut

it is one unit per 182 square feet. the building next door is one unit per 364 square feet. there have been numerous projects proposed and rejected by the neighbors, regarding the penthouse. if it is an elevator building, the elevator is required to go to the roof. it is california building code. if it is a handicapped building, the elevator is required to go to the roof. you cannot discriminate against anybody. a lot of people have been saying you do not need the elevator. it is part of the building code. thank you for your time. >> i will start out by speaking to the easement. my family was represented by john molinari, a judge. you do not have legal descriptions drawn up by lawyers and you do not have surveyors map easement and miss things. your intentions were captured in the legal description and the service. this plan does not conflict with any of the surveys that are recorded. the building to the right is one unit per 624 square feet. the building to the left is one unit per 364 square feet of dirt. the proposed project is one unit every 1182 square feet. it is far le

do the errands of the united states over many years from. questions. making asylum seekers in sweden. both to the cia freddy's is particularly strong now with a right leaning government in sweden and with the us wanting him for spying in sweden wanting him for sex crimes. julian assange is wanted by quite a team and the songe wiki leaks case seems to be just the next continuation of this very old intelligence relationship here's some other relationships we dug up julian assange ticks off the us with fierce reaction from one of the country's most notorious neo cons is not a particularly credible source and love and he is a you know two million homeowners it is a criminal only ought to be hunted down and grabbed and put on trial for what he has done hear these words from karl rove who claims he's part swedish and just happens to be advising the country's pm while the former swedish minister of justice is a partner in the firm who filed charges against a songe for sex crimes with another link to the us thomas von stroheim is claimed to have handed the cia

despite the grind of the danger the such unit has to follow up every lead. off from the unit's intelligence take some to envy god the sub of west grew up. people were hiding in a number published what was a robin hood to the people even that doesn't help a lot of. the poor he built churches. gave a lot of money to to people who idolize you know they were guarded and they were hiding. here in this house and the police were hoping to round up a few members of the cops out. this attack. on the. economy. unfortunately for the police they arrive too late and it wouldn't be the last time . elite forces well paid informants yet there was still no breakthrough to catch escobar there's a change of tactics with priority now being given to telecommunications. the americans provide an awacs surveillance aircraft and a twin engine plane to track vocal frequencies it's the first time such methods are used to hunt down one man. it means that colonel martinez and his men can eavesdrop on hundreds of telephone radio conversations day and night twenty four seventh's. then in

indeed, the united states today may stand in a historical unique position. no other great power in my memory has faced the situation in which it is likely to be attacked at home in a manner of the stems and probably more severe than 9/11 and have no means with which to respond to the enemy in a militarily telling manner. having already destroyed the known infrastructure of al qaeda and taliban we are the meaningful military targets and left with only the most likely default response to attack iran the matter who attacks us or attack symbolic targets such as population centers in afghanistan and pakistan or holy places such as mica or medina. thus after a second attack in the united states, the choice for washington would be one of two. to either standing motionless in a bloody rage or launching attacks the would like the late professor huntington warning of the clash of civilizations all to proceed. in america today as i think you'll agree the foregoing analysis isn't mainstream. india i've often heard it dismissed as pathological. yet more than 14 years aft

before the crisis household savings rate in the united states. was zero some quarters make it it is obviously not sustainable. since the crisis is coming up. but still not enough i'm also savings have gone up. five percent. publics a big sysco handout national deficit better risk a deficit of around ten percent so in terms of the overall savings rate of the economy we haven't improved we just shifted from one side to the other is there a risk that we will see a double dip i don't think in the united states there's mill much of a risk of a double dip but only a certain. of a decline in growth rate winnable said innocent player. and we've gotten a little bit of a boost because of the payroll tax cut that was just a nap so that payroll tax cut is and. makes a artificial support good thing to do but it was on from one year and that means that in didn't you hear that it's not renewed. that they go to force these constraints on states and localities the continuing. problems over leveraged. the house will just continue financing state governments the ne

for the electricity but the world we live in the united states we are moving in. providing security for our people. but. since the production of ceased in one thousand nine hundred eighty seven cleanup has been the only mission at the nuclear reservation there are fifty three million gallons of high level radioactive and chemical waste and fraud stored in one hundred seventy seven underground tanks seventy of these tanks have leaked spilling proximately one million gallons of waste into the soil. after washington is a wasteland of leaking radioactive waste that will be with us for decades and decades probably centuries to come and it's currently costing us billions of dollars to just try to contain let alone clean up in truth it's never going to be cleaned up and some of the radioactive waste will remain potentially lethal for twenty four thousand years which is any way you slice it a long time. the united states used to stockpile chemical weapons unbeknown to most of the world in germany and in okinawa with u.s. troops in japan and those two stockpiles which were

in the past few hours the united states has imposed sanctions on libya, while the united nations is considering further action in response to the bloodshed in the country. president obama said the sanctions would target the assets of colonel qaddafi, members of his family and the libyan government while at the same time protect the interest of the libyan people. britain and france have drafted the u.n. security council resolution, which calls for an arms embargo as well as multilateral sanctions. earlier i spoke to our correspondent in new york. the timing was important because the president waited until the evacuation of all u.n. nationals from libya before imposing sanctions. >> that was a concern for the united states and some other european countries who have quite a lot of nationals in libya to be seen to be taking strong action while their citizens were still at risk in the country. now president obama has formalized what his officials announced earlier today, which is the position of financial sanctions, particularly they are freezing the assets and the property of libyan individuals and

states is a world leader whether we care to admit that it or not so the reality is the united states is going to have influence we do have influence and in egypt the question is how can we exercise that influence to help the egyptian people themselves make the transition to democracy the military is the key institution here we've had egyptian generals egyptian officers train in the u.s. attend some of our military academies for at least the past two decades we're very close relations with them one reason this crisis didn't turn out badly and didn't become a bloodbath in all candor was because of those close relationships with that we have with the u.s. military they're in control right now we need to work very closely with them to develop the sort of institutions and process sees that will allow the egyptian people to move toward liberal democracy if i go to you in seattle here i mean we you know i am sure i am sure peter that if you. if you ask most egyptians they would say to john and to such and such discourses thanks but no thanks you have done enough damage for thirty years and