the university must take its boys and universities are either liable to the speaker, our universe isfor failing to stop the harassing conduct before it is greater hostile barbituric an impossible task to fulfill one duty without creating a liability for reaching the other. the second challenge that facing universes concerns provocateurs, people who do not come to campus to engage our students or opportunity in civil discourse or to advance the bait but to use campuses as estates to draw attention. supporters and opponents come dressed for battle not to exchange ideas but to exchange blows. the players in these dramas are not always members of our campus communities by outside groups hoping to use our campuses as a theatrical backdrop or become a martyr in the culture. in these cases are security costs are not related to the process are counterprotest by members of the academic community of a people come to our campus to fight. all agree protecting kept media violence is a compelling state interest last university of california at berkeley spent nearly $4 million on security for free

the university of texas. more than 1300 groups received some measure of support from the university. 4000day and more than colleges and universities, there are hundreds of thousands of classroom lectures, assignments, and discussions about every controversy all subject under the sun. in a given week there are thousands more extracurricular activities, lecturers, sermons, performances, and exhibits dealing with difficult topics. not to mention student protests are expressions -- or expressions of outside groups or uninvited speakers. an example from several years ago, and the space of more than a week at the university of mississippi, we hosted salman rushdie, the king of jordan, and spike lee. within a few semesters, the university hosted a presidential debate and invited the aclu and the nra to set up shop in issues alley on the day of the debate, giving each group a chance to speak. we dealt with a demonstration by in full -- klan regalia. that was a date in the life of a public university. we can find anec

for example, the university of south carolina decreed that henceforth university president -- the university president would be the commencement speaker imager, thereby dodging the political point entirely. after the right at berkeley last year during milo yiannopoulos abortive attempt to pressure abortive attempt is to conduct college. the college spent a shocking $600,000 to secure the campus from banshee. given that universities should be in place for sins have access for all sorts of different perspectives, are controversial speakers are like she's the campuses can afford to lose? our survey indicated that the answer to this question is a resounding no. first of all, it would be enormously unpopular. 92% of students felt have the opportunity to hear diverse guest speakers is important, and i think the survey made the reason for that clear. guest speakers often serve to challenge students deeply held beliefs or into distinct new ways of thinking about the world and they are successful in doing so. 64% of students admit that they changed quote, changed at least one of my attitudes, perspec

the university of bristol had fewer than five, as did the university of gloucestershire. were nine at the university of bath, but their neighbours, bath spa university, recorded no incidents at all. official figures show that the most likely victims of sexual assault are women between the ages of 16—24 7 so are university students any more at risk? hannah now runs a campaign group called revolt sexual assault, and they spoke to 4,500 students from over 150 universities earlier this year and their findings suggest the risk is greater. 8% of the people you interviewed on revolt sexual assault said they had been raped, but the numbers that the universities released are much lower. why do you think that is? one of the things we found from our study that i think was the most sort of strong piece of evidence is how little people are reporting it. so of the people that experienced sexual violence, only 6% were reporting this to the universities, and put that alongside the fact that up until quite recently and still at a lot of institutions, there isn't a visible way to report it

as a university in academy. one of my early influences as a young man with another great president, father ted from notre dame who many times i heard talk about the role of university as a beacon for his values, a bridge in a crossroads. we to read this person i don't get it wrong. a crossroads where the vital intellectual and moral currents were time made and are truthfully considered. i do wanted to dedicate this to the proposition of open-mindedness and critical thinking in search of solutions to the pressing issues facing us as citizens of this country and world. father ted, somewhat in his fashion used to quote russell, famous atheists philosopher who showed his open mindedness. to russell that's the richie that produces habit and desire for making us unwilling to entertain the idea that earlier beliefs may have to be revised or abandoned. its main value challenging the conviction that our views are absolutely certain. so, that's what we need more of. it's what au can play its role given the opportunity we

this would be my ideal universe. there are, in fact, better ways to improve people's lives and to help ordinary, average, unspecial people, i guess you could call them the deplorables, who have been unduly neglected by our elites and are walled off from them. i have a whole laundry list of causes that the big mega donors to harvard and yale could consider. if you look on the website, i've listed them. but i think that we really need to start talking about that. now, government also has a role to play here, and i will just close with this. it should seriously consider cutting back on the funds to universities for areas of study and research in the humanities and social science, for example, that have been hijacked, that are sites of antipathy to national identity and values and the unbalanced advancement of a particular political agenda. although we can say science and medical research would seem to be above distortionary politics, they are not. they are not today. support for them should also come under scrutiny. the

the universal credit is avakian workday. it's taking money away from families have put in more children into poverty. the national report found the universal credit is creating hardship, forcing people to use food tanks and could actually end up costing the system even more. does the prime minister dispute the national order of his findings? >> the right honorable gentleman talked about constituency cases. i remember -- i remember >> we had a fairly early stage of the proceedings with a long way to go. the questions must be heard and the answers must be heard and as usual it want to get through. >> the right honorable gentleman started his question by talking about constituency cases. i remember the single mother who came to see me as a member of parliament when they were in government, who told me that she wanted to get into the work place and provide a good example to her child. but the job center had told her she'd been set up. [inaudible] >> mr. speaker, my question was about -- [inaudible] they say usage in areas where

universities and dump them on beijing university and join's research labs. until that happens china will pull ahead in science because it carolina only about one thing -- carolina only about one thing in his science labs, accomplishment academic identity politic is tearing our osite apart, teaching young people to hate, to hate the greatest thinkers and creators of the past and hate temperature fellow americans the diversity delusion must be nipped in the bud. the next final self-engrossed students occupy a campus building, demanding more reparations, here's what their college president should say. are you kidding me? you are the most privileged individuals in human history. you have at your fingertip the thing that faust sold his soul for. knowledge. you're surrounded by libraries that would driven the renaissance humanists mad with envy and desire. you can read any book that has ever been written. you have access to science tick lab -- scientific lab towards that are the most as sanded in world, purr saw languages, lilt tour and history, everything is avai

i've logged on to the university of bristol website ?h with you. on what was available to hannah back in 2014. so has the university of bristol learnt from what happened to hannah? after she'd left the university. been very helpful for her. we are planning something we're calling the "respect" campaign. in order to try and influence behaviour, to inform and to educate. what constitutes sexual violence, sexual misconduct... between right and wrong? common sense, wouldn't it? people's common sense is in relation to the same issue. into the bubble of university life. particularly when it comes to booze. i think we need to be careful about blaming everything on alcohol. but those views have to be there. specialises in the study of violence against women. in our universities? is endemic in our society. so of course what happens in society is replicated at universities. the onus is on universities to respond to that in a meaningful way. are the universities doing enough to tackle the problem? the criminaljustice system. on specialist organisat

universities an increasing number of northwest european universities now regard themselves as commercial concerns in various ways are involved and also. series of business practices but also using management and business language to explain how they do what they do and i think that's quite dangerous i think it's quite corrosive of certain fundamental values about what universities should be and why they exist in the first place so yeah i kind of like that metaphor of the university big a history of the business school being a kind of virus that's now been injected into the university and is reconfiguring the university as you do mention would be really going to think that they are basically places that teach people how to get money out of the pockets of ordinary people and keep it for themselves that's what the so fundamentally feels would be yeah i mean. i need to be a little careful in that there are people like me within some business schools who are trying to teach more heterodox more critical kind of curriculum but the vast majority of stuff that's taught in the about thirteen thous

university of toronto than i pay for my younger son to attend american university. and he pays -- we pay for our son at university of toronto about eight times more than a canadian national would pay to go to the university of toronto. and that's their number one university. they consider that their harvard. i think there's something -- >> i got it. >> there's something we should address. >> okay. >> so in our state of tennessee, heavily controlled by republicans, heavily. like super majorities and a republican governor. we have in essence that. we have it. but i really do think that it is probably, and actually president obama, who i worked closely with, as you know, came down to our state to see what we were doing there. and he wanted to nationalize it. and i love what we were doing there. but i didn't want to nationalize it, okay. i felt like we would be so much better off if each state would emulate the things or use the characteristics that work for them. but to do, you know, to do the same kind of things we have done in our state where truly, even if you're 45

general counsel from the university of michigan is here today.ou will be discussing today will involve protected core liberties possessed by all americans, even students. those protections provided by our constitution are of instatable value. no top official at any university has the power to take them away. this has gone too far. it must end. the country protects, assembly in moderate speech or provocative speech, left or right. suppression of competing voices is not the american way. we have reached a pivotal, perhaps even historic moment. it's time to stand up to the bullies on campus, bullies in our culture. there are radicals out there that have openly and systematically justified actions that would deny americans the right to speak out against their favorite ideological agenda. we must put an end to such nonsense. it's time to put a stake in its heart. we have to stand up to it. and we will do so, resolute, we are going to keep fighting for the great freedoms to the american people. we will endeavor to do so according to the highest constit

many universities our state universities. in our system the public private line matters. and often to the good. that's not something we want to abolish -- abolish. it means that the government does not automatically control most academic power centers. especially first amendment protections did not directly limit them. that was brought out this morning. now, government does provide copious funding for education every level. that gives us a possible lever of control. and through legislation. the identity -based distribute laws that had been used to fuel corporate marxism on campus. what they have not done so far is metal in the content of courses. in the views expressed by faculty and students. some had expressed that they do so but i really doubt that they can do so effectively there are sound reasons that they have resisted mandating or regulating viewpoint diversity on campus. this goal is highly resistant to formalized legal regulations. what seems like intolerance to some is for others the relaxation of academic standards and it's very hard to codify the distinction.

pay to go to the university of toronto in a number one university. they consider that their harbor. i think there is something -- there's something there we should address. >> in our state of tennessee, heavily controlled by republicans. heavily, like super majorities and a republican governor. we have the. but i really do think that it is probably, and actually president obama however president obama whoever close to what does you came down to our state and to see what we were doing their thing he wanted to nationalize it. i loved what we were doing there, but i didn't want to naturalize it. i felt like we'd be so much better off with each state can emulate and use the characteristics that work for them, but to do the same thing we've done in our state, even if you're 45 years old and out of work are changing, you can still go back in tennessee and receive education for free. it's not fully the way you just described. sweden and denmark in other places in your right is pretty amazing. as a matter of fact, i heard a person make an argument. this was

college and university presence wouldn't do that. the biggest donor is the federal government and the taxpayers that provide more than $30 billion a year for pell grants. they provide more than 100 billion for new student loans. they provide about $35 billion a grantsr federal research through the national institutions of health. if 58% of republicans think colleges are bad for the american way of life, that is not very smart. about makingnking your biggest donor happy. my advice is to do all the things i've talked about, hecklers'veto, chicago principles, diversify opinion, have the forms because it's the right thing to do. i believe i would go see my local united states senator or congressman and say you have heard that we don't have diverse views on our campus, but let me show you that we do. let me show you all the things that we have in place to do it. i think it is a very big threat to the quality and support for higher education in the united states. mr. rosenstein: the next question relates to that issue. given that higher ed

university and china's research labs. the greatest thinkers and creators of the past and their fellow americans. that diversity delusion must be nipped in the bed. the next time self engrossed students occupy a building , here is what the college president should say, far from discriminating underrepresented minorities in order to engineer diversity i can assure you the faculty are not big it's nothing but goodwill for history and want all students to succeed and at this very moment millions of asian students are studying night and day for the privilege of experiencing this hatred if you feel so oppressed step aside and let them take your place. but a college president never says any of these things of course instead he is silent for the outbreaks of narcissistic delusion happy to sell out to the faculty as alleged racist and promising to make amends it becomes imperative to rebut to the victim olla g-letter narrative and it is not enough that if i may borrow the term a relatively safe stance to take know if we are going

to dump them on beijing university and the's research lab. until that happens they will go ahead in science because they care only about one thing at the science lab, accomplishments. politics kit - - tears our society apart to hate the greatest thinkers and creators of the past. it must be nipped in the bed. the self and grill students are you kidding me? >> you are the most privileged individual in human history and that what they sold their soul. you are surrounded by libraries of the humanist mad with desire. and literature and history so far from discriminating every faculty search is one wrong effort those that have not already been snapped up. far from discriminating those under representatives in order to have diversity. i can assure you my faculty are not bigots and have nothing but good will and at this very moment millions of students are studying night and day this maelstrom of hatred to feel so oppressed then step aside and let them take your place but a college president never says any of these things but instead is silent happy

university. you mentioned the managing finances.t? university. you mentioned the managing finances. how was that7m was not so bad because we all like a bit of money! yes, we do! it was making sure we were paid up the right time and it was the right amount, without forgetting if it is not paid within a certain time, there will be fees and fines and might have to pay. sometimes you forget as a young person because thatis forget as a young person because that is not your responsibility so a lot of times i would forget and had to call up lot of times i would forget and had to callup and lot of times i would forget and had to call up and make sure there is an extension and i can make sure it has been agreed in the moment of time. these are challenges most contemporaries of yours at that time would not have been facing at all. no, most of my friends around the time of college were thinking of university or going partying because they want to go to college. for me, there was always another level of me being overwhelmed by looking after a f

mark: how about a round of plus for both hampton university and liberty university.ause] len: and how about the students and their questions, ladies and gentlemen. [applause] mark: very proud to be able to work them into tonight's event the way we did. thank you so much for watching. thank you so much for joining us. again, have a great night. [captions copyright national cable satellite corp. 2018] >> with the control of congress in question this election day, see the competition for yourself on c-span. watch the debates from key house and senate races. make c-span your primary source for campaign 2008. >> tonight, president trump is in las vegas hosting a campaign rally in support of republican incumbent senator dean heller as well as other g.o.p. candidates. live coverage begins at 10:00 p.m. eastern right here on c-span, your primary source for campaign 2018. >> this weekend on book tv, saturday at 4:15 p.m. eastern, book - woodward's new "fear: the trump white house." >> someone who's in office right now called me and said everyone knows that what you have in th

at our university. we are a land grant university. we were put there by eight lincoln and his allies to it -- to lincoln and his allies spread democracy. been much has still too much concentration among too many schools of paying customers and people at high students that --e just that the ratings thataptitude students would adjust the ratings. low income and minority students who have not participated nearly enough, and that is not what has been recognized and rewarded either reputational he or financially for much of the recent past. l: the pathway to hire college ratings, but not for helping people, they kids who can afford it, you get rewarded for how much you have in a library, how much you spent on inputs, almost everything but what we have to care about most. of ally young people kinds did you launch into successful lives? neil: larry, you have been a vocal -- been vocal about companies, making sure they are doing what is best for the american economy. you publish a letter to ceos on your website. that companies put themselves

let's talk universal credit.gerbread, the world and his wife have been critical of universal credit. is it not time to think again?|j critical of universal credit. is it not time to think again? i think we have debated this to death in the chamber over the last 12 months or more, pretty much everybody in the house agrees with the principles of universal credit that were laid out and that it is wrong for people to be in and that it is wrong for people to beina and that it is wrong for people to be in a scenario where they lose money by taking on work or a job and thatis money by taking on work or a job and that is where we are now. so there is no question that universal credit is no question that universal credit is the right thing to do. clearly rolling anything out on that scale isa rolling anything out on that scale is a challenge and that is why it has been so slow. myjob centre in my constituency are calm and that they have had the time to prepare for it. every time there are changes, that system improves. fi

he had deep worries about in disagreements with reactionary tendencies and the university, the university of paris, the sor bonne. we differid, between a monarchy in a despotism. the difference between a moderate regime ruled by one person and immoderate, terroristic regime is the existence and protection of the intermediate bodies. not because they are doing good stuff. why then? well, in part because they provided an organized social basis for countervailing power. to a neck an -- bit for montesquieu to worry about that -- but he could see it in the distance. as kings become powerful like louis xiv. who can stand against them? we'll never be one person. can only be organized social bodies. a mixedd unlike constitutional tradition and political thought, montesquieu did not limit itself in terms of power checking power. rather, he said, the intermediate bodies will defend law. they will not simply set the power against the kings power. rather, they will insist on the continued legal status of their inherited rights. and so, they will insist on the idea that a king faces legal constraints

and hampton university. the topic of this townhall was domestic policy and the economy. this runs just under one hour. c-span is your primary source for campaign 2018. >> good evening and welcome to tonight's u.s. senate town hall between the democrat, senator tim kaine and his republican challenger, corey stewart. brought to you by the center for law and government at liberty university and hampton university's center for public policy. events like tonight's are extremely important as we head into a crucial midterm election. tonight's townhall will focus primarily on domestic issues. the next townhall, at hampton university, will focus more on foreign policy and military. we are live in the beautiful concert hall at the center for the music and worship arts at liberty university. i'm len stevens, executive director of communications at liberty university. mark: i'm mark spain. anchor at abc 13 news in lynchburg. thank you for being with us. tonight we will bring the candidates out one at a time. each candid

berkeley is one of the most prestigious universities new usa. is also where many of the protest movements of the sixty's got their start. at the end of the summer students came back from mississippi who were in mississippi students who had been active in the civil rights movement and are thought was that the civil rights movement was going to continue to grow and build and we came back the university administration issued a decree saying yes it was a violation of the university you walls to engage in any kind of social or political activity on the campus and the origin of that almost certainly was conservative business groups in the bay area. were telling of university we don't want the berkeley campus to become a base for mobilizing attacks on us you have to control the students they are the order of our side so that was where the free speech movement came from. it was a movement that said to establish the space of the university as one in which open discourse and critical discourse would be sheltered protected. accepted and affirmed. so. and t

we did what universities are supposed to do.all things considered, i think we handled the visit really well. let me attempt to draw three lessons from the notre dame experience on how free speech might be better can secured on campuses. diversity,lectual intellectual and viewpoint diversity facilitates in our central free-speech to be respected and protected. the university of noble -- notre dame has faculty that we can bring to campus from all sides of the political spectrum. --re dame's tackle the faculty liens left, in some cases heavily left. there are a sufficient number of conservatives. notre dame avoids one of the deledealer tereus -- terious effects. the problems that attend intellectual homogeneity when it comes to speaking invitations, faculty invite scholars they know. in academia, professional networks and social networks overlap, which means an overwhelmingly liberal faculty will invite speakers who are overwhelmingly liberal. that is how it works. this also explains why conservative speakers are brought by student

and hampton university. good evening and welcome to tonight's u.s. senate town hall between democrat senator tim kaine and his republican challenger, corey stewart, brought to you by liberty university and hampton university. events like tonight's are extremely important as we head into a crucial midterm election. remember the vote is on november 16. tonight's townhall will focus primarily on domestic issues. the next townhall atlantic university will focus more on foreign policy and military. in the beautiful concert hall at the center for music in the worship arts here at liberty university. at libertytevens university. mark: and i mark spain. thank you all for being with us. tonight we will bring the candidates out one at a time. each candidate will begin by answering questions for me for the first half of their appearance. i am my co-moderator are the only two who have seen these questions prior to tonight's event. after that q&a, we will send things over to you. len: and that is one things will get much

the general counsel from the university of michigan is here today. make no mistake, the issues you ill be discussing today will involve protected core liberties americans, evenl students. hose protections provided by our constitution are of value.ble no top official at any has the power to take them away. this has gone too far. it must end. protects, assembly in moderate speech or rovocative speech, left or right. suppression of competing voices is not the american way. pivotal, ached a perhaps even historic moment. t's time to stand up to the bullies on campus, bullies in our culture. radicals out there that have openly and actionsically justified that would deny americans the theirto speak out against favorite ideological agenda. such t put an end to nonsense. it's time to put a stake in its heart. stand up to it. resolute, we o so, are going to keep fighting for freedoms to the american people. we will endeavor to do so to the highest constitutional and legal tandards and we plan to keep winning. thank you very much for joining we wish you every s

they have received unfavorable treatment at the university and particularly outside of the university. that would not continue under his reign at the university. i tried to set up a meeting with him. he would not set up a meeting with me. even though he said he have the open door policy. in the reason he gave was he thought meeting with me might have a negative impact on conservative. i did not meet him during the hearing we made an attempt to call him who was the dean dean of the university of oklahoma. none of the calls were returned. i never spoke with them. that i did speak with him on the telephone. it was worse than a courtesy call. to talk about the full accordance of what's going on. they did however invite me and my family. to come by it was the furthest thing from where i was doing that. it was kind of a strange call. i was in a call to call the substance of what's going on. the tumors were very painful. on a normal day, i would start out and in some amount of pain. by the end of the day on a normal day i would have enough pain that i would have to take pain medication. it w

you are watching the town hall brought to you by liberty university and hampton university. [applause] welcome back. welcome back. len: it is now time for our students at liberty university to pose their questions directly to mr. stewart. let's get to it. i'm going to call out the name and the topic. tim is a junior from pittsburgh, pennsylvania. the topic is your candidacy. tim: thank you for being here. my name is tam and i'm the president of the college republicans at liberty. in my experience, with those in my generation, i found that many republicans are hesitant about your candidacy and rhetoric. the polling shows you down significantly to senator kaine. how do you plan to win republicans over at you will need our support to win this election? mr. stewart: thanks a lot. something that not everybody knows is that i am currently elected, and not just in a solidly conservative part of the state. i'm the at large chairman of the board of supervisors for prince william county. it's almost a half million eople. it is the first majority-minority county in virginia and i been

get into the university do want and universities desperately trying to attract.in the uk. they have got a much greater choice of universities to go to. and that means universities are operating in a very tough and very competitive market for students. and actually it's a relatively immature market for students. a number of years ago, consumer law and complying with advertising regulationsjust consumer law and complying with advertising regulations just wasn't on universities‘ agendas. advertising regulations just wasn‘t on universities‘ agendas. i think the great thing that which? are doing today is highlighting that this is an issue. it‘s a wake—up call for universities to get their house in order. it's not actually that many universities doing this. six out of 130 identified by which? it isa six out of 130 identified by which? it is a small number, but we believe the stakes are high for students when they apply for university. a lot of effort goes into deciding where to go, visiting campuses and looking at all the information and making sure it's the right choi

university, our some people don't know, we're a land grant university. abe lincolnthere by and his allies to expand and democratize higher education beyond the privileged few who had taken part in it up until then. still been tooas much concentration among too customersls on paying and people with high aptitude, dress upwho would their ratings. and so we have a different outlook. and a lot of programs we can talk about later, if you want, recruiting but successg to ensure the of first-generation low-income minority students who have not participated nearly enough. and that's not what has been and rewarded. either reputationally or of theally, for much recent past. but it needs to change now. youo improve your ratings, admit kids with the highest s.a.t. scores who can pay full that's the pathway to higher ratings but not for helping? >> you get rewarded for how many books in your library, how much inputs, almost everything but what we ought to care about most. young people of all kinds did you launch into successful lives? >> so you've been a vocal corpor

senate brought to you by liberty university and hampton university. [applause] >> welcome back. our studentse for here at liberty university to pose their questions directly to mr. stewart. corey, hope you're ready for some tough questions. >> i'm ready. going to call out the name and topic. tim is a junior from pittsburgh your candidacy. >> hi, mr. stewart. being here to answer our questions. my name is tim and i'm the president of the college republicans here at liberty university. in my experience and with those of my generation i've found that republicans are hesitant about your candidacy and your rhetoric. and polling showed you down significantly to senator kaine. to get you need to do the support to win this election? >> you know, there's something not everybody knows, and that is i'm currently elected, in a solidly conservative part of the state, i'm in northern virginia, i'm theat large chairman of board of supervisors for prince william county, it's almost a the million people, it's first majority-minority county in northern virginia and i've reelecteded there and ther

. >> heather mcdonald's latest book, corrupt the university and undermine culture, heather, mcdonald, you spoke at claremont college, how was that? >> well, i spoke to an empty room. there was a massive student blockade outside. i had to be escort intoed the room through police through the kitchen and throughout my speaking to this empty blockaded auditorium, protestors, 200 of them were pounding on the glass windows chanting and finally they became so unruly outside that the police decided they could no longer guaranty my safety and i had to be escorted again back through a secret passage way to waiting police car and whisked off campus. >> host: what is about you that generates that type of response? >> guest: i challenge the dominant narrative in academia about policing, i argue that continue -- contrary to black lives matter movement that there are lots of law abiding residents of high-crime areas who are desperate for the police and who support them and that the police are the government agency most committed to black lives. >> host: after your talk there, there was a statement p

how they corrupt the university and undermine our culture kevin mcdonald you spoke at claremont mckenna college, how was that. i spoke to an empty room. there was a massive student blockade outside. i have to be escorted into the room by police through a secret passageway through the kitchen and throughout my speaking to this empty blockaded auditorium. .. .. back through a secret passageway to a waiting police car. >> host: what is it about you that generates that type of response? >> guest: i challenged the dominant academia about policing, i argue the contrary to black lives matter, there are lots of residents of high crime areas who are desperate for the police and who support them and the police are the government agency most committed to black lives. >> host: after your talk there was a statement put out by we view the black students. who are we you? feel? >> they were students of color who felt i was the embodiment of everything the campus identity politics demonizes, for the very existence of students of color and overwhelming number of victims with females as one of those and t

—— university.the degrees we offer students offer value for money. we have just finished a youth voice census which was a temperature check for young people. 0ut was a temperature check for young people. out of that, 70% of graduates told us they won't get in contact with employers at university. not dealing with a business at all? no. should be university be doing more? if someone is back at university this month, should they be saying to their university, put me in touch with these businesses? absolutely, when an employer is looking for applicants, they will look at the quality of their education but the work experience, things they've been involved in, in addition to their education. young people have to start demanding from their courses better value for money, better engagement with employers and better networks. looking at young people from disadvantaged backgrounds, they're from disadvantaged backgrounds, they‘ re less from disadvantaged backgrounds, they're less likely to have these networks

talking, that's what universities want students to do more.th academic pressures and outside lectures, they're encouraged to have difficult conversations with other students in unusual situations. like weeding, while at the allotment society. but, according to the body which represents vice chancellors, while all universities know that there is a problem, not enough are making it a priority. i think university leaders have been slow to adopt this as a priority. with some exceptions. and we need to persuade vice chancellors and principals that it really is core to the success of their organisations. i don't think a generation of students will forgive universities who do not prioritise this. that report by chi chi is and do. an investigation by bbc radio 5 live has found that the number of elderly people who say they have been the victim of scamming has nearly doubled in the last three yea rs. in some cases, people have lost hundreds of thousands of pounds. fraudsters scammed almost 119,000 older people across the uk in the past year, equivalent

universities are most tolerant except for the concert but they are not discriminating. yet the students are told by the on-campus they are victims. they have read the constitution. were the challenges or the difficulty that anger american culture developed of law and constitutional government. with that the apparatus that graduate diversity forced diversity of the time officer director the office of economic development gender orientation issues with counsel and change culture diversity council will enter sexual gender resource center are those all separate metaphors. that is 2012 biking. it has grown to be because students and their coach dependent. generating categories to their realm. this stream of inclusion bureaucracies cost $20 million per year year. understand that this is going up because of this was treated in the public discourse from a naturally occurring phenomenon and the solution is not more funding but at the diversity bureaucracies premised on a life you are a privileged white woman city you have a different experience than for those that don't have you

general counsel for the university of michigan is here today. discussing today involve protected core liberties possessed by all americans, even students and those protections provided by our constitution or our and inestimable value. no third level pure at a community at any university has the power to take them away. this has gone too far and it must and. the country protects [inaudible] suppression of competing voices is not the american way. we have reached a pivotal or historic moment and it's time to stand up to the bullies on campus and bullies in the culture. radicals are out there that have openly and systematically justified actions that would deny americans the right to speak out against their favored ideological agenda. we must put an end to such nonsense it is time to put a state untrained stake in its heart. we have to stand up to it. we will do so resolutely. we will keep fighting for the great freedoms of the american people and we will endeavor to do so according to the highest constitutional and legal standards and we plan to k

harding symposium, posted by ohio state university. -- hosted by ohio state university. it's just over an hour. >> is my pleasure to introduce our first presenter, a native of and graduated from university in degrees in anguish -- in english. -- in english and university studies. she began her degree in journalism and served as city hall and police reporter, as well as sunday edition editor. she later served as copy editor and bureau chief at the canton, ohio repository. she was named manager of the harding presidential site after serving eight years as coordinator of the programs.

we are live here at liberty university. i'm len stevens, executive director of communications at liberty university. mark: i'm mark spain. we will bring the candidates out one at a time. each candidate will begin by answering questions from me right here. i and my co-moderator, len stevens, are the only two who have seen these questions. after that q and a, we will send it to you. len: i will be with dozens of liberty university students who hail from all over the country. they will be able to ask questions directly of the candidates. when that segment has ended, each candidate will have one minute to make a closing statement. i know these voters have thought a lot about the issues. they are ready to go. mark: we want our studio audience to refrain from cheers and applause during the question and answer segment. it is ok to applied when we welcome the candidates on to the stage. please welcome corey stewart. [applause] >> it is good to see you again. we interviewed with each other several weeks ago, so it is our last time i

in 201010 -- 2010 the government declared that universal credit would lift children out of po poverty does the prime minister stand on that figure? >> we introduced universal credit because we needed a system of welfare in the country which encouraged people into work rather than discourage them to work, which made sure that work always pays and was simple system than legacy system that we were left by the labour party, remember, remember the legacy system of the labour party, it meant that we even had individuals being paid a hundred thousand pounds all paid by workers earning half a fraction of that. >> mr. speaker, the child poverty action group says that far from taking children out of poverty, universal credit will now increase the number of children in poverty. and since 2010, half a million more children have gone into poverty relative to that time. the federal government knows this policy is fraud and failing. their own survey on universal credit many were in debt, half fallen behind with the bills, does the prime minister dispute their own government survey or dispute the exp

harvard university. she is a recipient of their prestigious grawmeyer award for education. she has also received awards

state university top in ticket sales for the west virginia state university tayour doctor about xarelto ticket sales for the west virginia state university >>> here's a look at today's forecast in some cities around the country. >>> well, part of the trickle-down effect of the opioid epidemic is its impact on children of addicts. in some cases it's forced grandparents to step in and take over the family, raising the grandkids while their own children battle substance abuse. kenneth craig reports from hard hit west virginia. >> reporter: at 65 and 62 years old, sharon and terri beckett are raising children for a second time. >> you just love them like they're your very own. they struggle because they miss their mom and dad sometimes. >> reporter: mariah and elijah were left in their care while their parents are battling drug addictions. their mother has been out of their lives for ears and their father in and out of rehab. >> what were you most fearful of the situation? >> that the welfare would come and take them and put them in another home. >> reporter: the number of children removed

in the last 18 months, 11 students have taken their lives at bristol university.nd of the first year, you think, "oh my god, i've already spent £9,000 on this course, £6,000 on accommodation, i'm already £15,000 deep." that's terrifying, you think, "i can't drop out now, but i can't carry on like this." the idea of an out is very appealing unfortunately. what saved you do you think? couldn't do it to my parents. it's appealing personally, but, like, to leave people behind... no. just couldn't have done it. and that's why this university is investing millions into its mental health service. as well as its new consent policy, there's three new student centres open 24 hours a day, and over 50 new staff keeping a watch—out for those who are struggling. to have a student death from any cause is a real tragedy, to have a number in quick succession really tears at the very heart of our institution, and our mantra now is the mental health is everybody's business at our university. the number of first year students arriving at university with a mental health condition is n