here is a study conducted by scientists from the university of adelaide. e period between february 23rd and march 8th. five and two tenths of a million tweets were published on twitter, from 60 to 80% of the accounts were fake, and 90% of these accounts were about ukrainian. and what is the goal, but to sow distrust in the government uncertainty? a constant feeling of inconvenience of a general distrust of looking back. what if, because this is what griboedov said at one time, the fluctuations of the minds are not solid in anything, and this is aggression, the more insane it is, the more effective it is. look, listen to the truth. i serve in the protection of the kremlin putin is not just dismissed. they want to kill him in the morning , the guys broke into the brains, there was a shootout in the kremlin, we fought back, we were forbidden to tell all this. and lavigne is hot for us in the kremlin today, apparently, they want to remove vladimirovich , he shoots again, probably, according to the news, they will not show the request. you at least tell us that

to deploy troops on each other's territory for an android giant is ever it is professor at university of adelaide and an expert on japanese foreign policy. he says there is a risk of an arms race in the pacific region because japan's leadership has been talking about what's happened in what has happened ongoing and new grain that might possibly be did in the, in the free. and that me is called the high one place and china is action. but also i think japan was concerned about north korean messiahs launches. busy very often and that sentence japan quite a bit. it's not just china, i think it's not as well. so wide ranging security challenges as the japanese. busy just tell us the reality of this situation is that the good it could create an arms race, which i find is the call just to get to dilemma that one countries in the budget on defense can lead to another countries increase in defense spending. that's what's happening, it's besides the, at this stage. but i think japan is interested in lot in seeking peace and japan option. i just see that miss, you have to have some kind of greater differenc

we can now speak to with andrew jan, who's emeritus professor at university of adelaide, and joins us from tokyo. welcome to the show. so say rachel security, very much a focus on the agenda. how important is japan's relationship with united states? well, this is very important in japan, us security. tricky. since 1960 and defined the relationship that treaty was signed in 1960. now the men in japan wants to give. busy a wide scope of the treaty in the background of japan device, national security strategy and japan. why is defense strategy? where as you introduce japan, this is committed to increase the defense budget and acquire what they call. busy you know, destro, i believe she also long range the size so obviously japan and dance is very important to have this discussion. busy the american president, and that's what, thanks to you mentioned that was meeting official meeting and just to washington was going to do us all with an eye on china is so it's a movements and plans around taiwan. that's one aspect because japan's leadership has been talking about what's happened in what h

university of south australia. he is also the university's radiation safety officer. he joins us now from adelaide. and ivan, i was looking at scale images of this canister. it's remarkable that something so very, very small can be so very, very dangerous. it seems. yeah, it's very concentrated so you can get off radiation. the boat is so small. can you give us a sense of the kind of radiation exposure that we're looking at? i understand it's really close contacts that were most concerned about here. yes, that would be. what would be most concerning is this that was in close proximity for a long period of time. so the real danger with somebody walks along. so we're interested in, i thought it was curious and picks it up and put it in their pocket or held it for a long time. so it was close to them for a long period of time, and they could experience radiation toxicity. so it's not necessarily then super dangerous for people outside of an immediate and immediate circumference say, but close to it. yes. so i wouldn't be worried if i walk past this and didn't even recognize that it was there that would