of zionism. ramin mazeri has more from chicago. this week, students at harvard university filed a civil rights complaint against the school for not protecting pro-palestinian students from, quote, terrifying and unchecked harassment, as the devastating effects of the so-called palestine exception to free speech continues to reak havoc at campuses across the nation. when there is anti-palestinian bias, it's not addressed and it's ignored, but when there is accusations of anti-semitism, um, everyone's in involved, it's highlighted, and so we do see an extreme difference in that, if you know campuses across the country are concerned about anti-semitism, which they should be concerned, and now at this point they're concerned about anti-israel bias, why are they not concerned about palestinian bias, especially um, you know, palestinians were grieving, i have students that have lost multiple family members and then while they're you know having this anxiety and they have to study, they're also being vilified at the same time, university of illinois campus in chicago, supporters of palestine described how students and professors feel criminalized,

we all have a vested interest in protecting the rights of workers, especially civil rights, and you were talking about this universal opportunity for retraining. all of you have said a version of that along here. in your experience, what are some of the factors that should -- that employers should way, should be thinking about when considering when thinking about ai implementation to make sure workers are included and at the same time protected, but really more included i think is what mr. billingsley was saying. >> thank you, mr. chairman. the framework that all companies should aspire to who deploy ai, large or small, is to have either by name or the equivalent a chief ai officer, and one of their responsibilities will be to educate and disclose transparently to the workforce what ai systems are being used in the workplace that can affect your hire, your fire, your promotion, job selection, etc. by being transparent in that way as one facet of the chief ai officer's job, it takes a lot of the fear and uncertainty away and the workforce can see they are not being treated unfairly by ai because they understand what

newman, we all have a vested interest in protecting the rights of workers, especially their civil rights. and you were talking about that, this universal opportunity for a retraining, which i think really makes a lot of sense. all of you have set a version of that along here. what are some of the factors that should way -- that employers should way and should be thinking about when considering ai implementation to really help make sure that workers are included and at the same time protected? but really, included. >> thank you for the question, chairman. and the framework that all companies should aspire to deploy ai, whether large or small, is to have either by name, or the equivalent, a chief ai officer. and one of their responsibilities will be to educate and disclose transparently to the workforce what ai systems are being used in the work place that can, in fact, you are hired, you are fired, your promotion, your identification for promotion, job selection, et cetera. and by being transparent in that way is one facet of the chief ai officers job. it takes a lot of the fear and uncertainty away, and the workforce can be that they a

would flashing the funding for the office of civil rights by 25% as house republicans have proposed, make it harder for school and university leaders to protect students and fostering safe and supportive learning environment? >> i appreciate the question. i'm not familiar with the particular proposal you are suggesting. as i mentioned before and will reinforce, the office of civil rights, which is there for all students, deserves adequate funding that they can deal with a large number of cases that it has. i also believe the office, there may be things that we can do right now to help. for example, i had a meeting with the attorney general last week and recommended detailing lawyers from the department of justice over to education, it would not require additional money to help them deal with the backlog of cases. i recommended ipas, put people in the federal government on short terms of service, it does not require additional money but you can do that without raising the headcount. finally, the department of education does not need to wait for cases to be brought to it. it can appoint almost a special prosecutor, that is not the right term bu

appointments zubr, aviation ministry of emergency situations, research institute of the university of civil protectionas become a tradition for the department to hold a ceremony at the museum on the eve of its professional holiday. you are that link in the chain, yes , without which, in principle, the whole chain will not work out, that is, you are the first person they call and say: something happened there, something, and you understand that everything needs to be done this way, that way. so and so. of course, i would like to wish that there would be fewer calls in general; today, issues of patriotism are at the forefront of our department. i hope that these young guys will fulfill their official duty with honor and dignity, with courage and bravery.