of shame within us. but for some people, it develops to such an extent that it stifles every positive feeling. the co share is a psychologist at the university of co does or in nice. her research focuses on the cycle pathology of shame. because while she is important for society to function, it can also make us sick, causing depression, eating disorders or addiction. often the foundations for these problems are formed in childhood or offered to ski force of well stick um same as initially a good thing on effect because it gives the child orientation and structure a. this took to head on from local fits loans to loop to home so that it comes from the gaze of the mother. yeah. so the or another person who takes special care of the time they're doing a best friend who can do man. yeah. previously known for their so look that both the shames and at the same time conveys a feeling of shame, tests me alone. in that moment it's like the child is looking into a mirror, walkable go fits on them. they become aware of how they are perceived by others, and this shows do so from the moment i feel ashamed. do i realize that i exist? it's independent of th

and then halifax, canada gavin fidel, a professor of political science and global development studies st. mary's university. he's the co author also of rethinking development products. exciting gentleman for joining us on today's inside story program. we've seen of foster moving a timeline of action and reaction and recent house. i want to come to that in a moment, greg, but 1st i'd like you to take us back a bit. this is something that donald trump campaigned on when he was elected in the event, but you support his policies. so explained to us, what is he trying to achieve with these towers? that's a great question and then you're absolutely right, james. the telegraph to rather well in the campaign as well as during the transition. so, and when president trump is trying to accomplish is what the really, what the voters of the americans voted for, which was fairness in trade and, and more equal treatment by our trading partners. in other words, having terrorist basically around the same level. so there's, uh, there's just trading equality. but secondly, he's using it as a geo political weapon, as, as discussed in the,

. >> joining me now, joyce vance, former federal prosecutor, now university of alabama law professor, co-host of the sisters in law podcast and an msnbc legal analyst. joyce, welcome to you. so two notions stand out to me from that statement by senator murphy, comparisons to watergate and constitutional crisis by definition. are we in a constitutional crisis? and whatever this is, is it worse than watergate? >> yeah, i think it's. >> very difficult to make those. comparisons in the moment, simply because we don't know what's. going to come next. we know what happened in watergate. ultimately, the rule of law and the constitution held here. we have questions heading into this week. >> and so i think the. >> best answer alex. >> i can give. >> is to say this. >> elections have consequences. >> and one is that presidents get to set priorities. donald trump can decide that immigration is the most. important thing he wants to do during his term in office. people may agree or they may disagree, but he has that power as president. the question now is whether he has other power and authority he'

of many countries, so it's as large as portugal or sweden. in 2023, i spoke with medical co director of brown university's costs of wool project in 2019. her team uncovered a startling fact. the us department of defense has a larger annual carbon footprint than most countries on us. to say the us military emissions are $52000000.00 metric tons annually is to say the united states is the single largest energy user. and the us military is therefore the single largest carbon emitter, looking at it as an institution. 30 percent of those emissions are from races across the world and 70 percent or from operations. you calculate us mandatory emissions. it's more than many, many other countries. so it's really if the elephant in the room that has been ignored so far, that's nic buxton author and research show, but the interested in bass transnational institute. that was just a report showing that the ministry spending globally has reached 2 point one trillion now. and the war and the claim and now in gaza has kind of given that mex tributes. every time industry spending increases, military emissions increases. getting clarity on emissions is a

she's the founder of the center for journalism and democracy at howard university. she's the cot's talk about this idea. this idea i was talking about it with with eddie glaude yesterday, that as we see progress, particularly for black people or people of color or marginalized groups in america, this happens. we get remarkable pushback. and some people think that in 1865, the civil war ended and slavery ended, and things marched happily on. not true at all. it was it was fully 100 years later that we even got close to the equality that most people think we got in 1865. and now we're in this sort of a period again. >> absolutely. >> thanks for having. >> me on. and just to clarify, everything you read from the boston review piece was not written by me. so i definitely don't want to take credit for someone else's scholarship. so i. >> think what's. >> important to understand in this moment, i called it the second nadir, that that phrase, the nadir, was coined by the historian rayford logan, and it talked about this. period that we now call jim crow. so why is that important? becau

of growth. it is the co founder of the cost of oil projects at a professor at the university of ox, but she georgia, as now from ox, with nature. the fit goes a staggering the challenges of immense can guns. a be rebuilt. yes, because it can be rebuilt by the people of god and external actors. but it's going to take a lot of work obviously. but where do we begin? the rubble for stuff is, i mean, what happens to all of that? well, all of the rubble has to be removed, but of course there are human remains under the rubble, in addition to unexploded ordnance which can be very deep. or could be right on the surface could look like toys to children. so the removal of the rubble itself is quite in endeavor. it will take a long time and in fact, much of the rubble and the munitions may remain for decades. where would that rumble go? i'm going to come and stay within guns are counted. well, some of it will be used in reconstruction. is the foundation for buildings or taken out of guys that can be recycled? but again, much of it will remain. all right, so who is going to rebuild gossip? who's going to pay f

institution, stanford university, professor of international relations and politics at pepperdine university school of public policy. she is an expert in national security and public leadership. the co-author of two books on ronald reagan, both of which sold very well. she has served remarkably as director of policy planning at the united states department of state in the first trump administration. i believe that was a position first occupied by george kennett, has had a distinguished set of leaders ever since. she is affiliated with the america first policy institute and the heritage foundation. she is an advisor to the president of the heritage foundation. i mentioned she is an expert in national security. doug, i think, in his remarks, said in passing the project encountered some special difficulties in trying to come up with national security measures. so, kiron, please give us your thoughts on national security, the state of our national security and how we go about assessing the state of our national security. please. kiron: first, let me thank professor doug harris for doing this project. when you first contacted me a couple years ago i said there is no way you could pull th

of the last american vagabond, as well as co founder of the independent media alliance. and in brisbane we crossed to what we paul, he's an address professor at queensland university and technology and senior fellow at the ty, hey, institute, or a gentleman cross talk role, is that effect? that means you can jump anytime you want, and i always appreciate a daniel, um, so much to talk about here. i was leading, obviously, in my introduction, i'm going to quote marco rubio right now. it's not normal for the world. have a unit polar power, remarkable. coming from like a secretary of state, and then on the heels of this we have the or which seems to be the imminent destruction of the u. s. a. i d, at least in his current or is former incarnation. we don't know where it's going to go. from here, the point is my friend so much is happening. i think they're related uh, take it from here daniel. yeah, i mean, i think what we're seeing is a global crash of, of neo liberalism. and it reminds me of the crash of communism in 1989 to 91. i think the world is going to a major phase change uh the the, the rules of the last 35 years or so. i have 4 on the park and we're inter entering into a ne

of its kind within the california state university system. and joining us now from san francisco state is professor adam story. story, a co-director of the climate hq for the school. thanks for being with us this afternoon. thanks for having what went behind the decision to make this change? >> so we began climbing hq in 2022. and we're charged with transforming campus with respect to climate change. one of our early goals was to ensure all students learn about climate change before they graduate. so to that end for the last 2 years, we've been working with other parts of campus to revise any existing graduation requirements that it now emphasizes climate justice. believe this is really important because it institutionalize is as the state's longstanding commitment to climate justice in reflex are, you know, forest university's core value of social justice and a what? >> year in school kids have to take this. >> so they can to get any of the years that they're at sf state. and it's just it's just a graduation requirement similar to other requirements that they have to take in bath or to be able to graduate. and this start

co-chair. and i believe most importantly, you're a university of alabama graduate. is that not correct?good taste, laura. good taste. >> laura: all right. good man. cj, you sent a letter to the new york magazine. what did it say? and what are you trying to accomplish? >> we called them out for portraying deliberately in event in a false light. they made an objective effort to try to exclude every black attendee from this event perpetuate the narrative that was some maga kkk. this was joyous young people coming together to celebrate the fact that president trump was returning to the whitehouse and we're not ashamed of it but we are going to hold them account for their lies and down right slander >> laura: well, how are you going to actually prove defamation? because you actually have to prove intent, which you could infer, i guess in the way they cropped that. but that they had malice of forethought and what they wanted to do. >> yeah. >> laura: do you believe you'll find the evidence in discovery? are you really going to move forward with a defamation claim? because if so, you know, eve

so consent, i think it's fair to say and of course, this is a book co-written with ed herman, who was a professor at the wharton school university of pennsylvania. i think the two of them were grappling with one big question, which is how in societies such as ours, are people coerced are people convinced to take on positions often unpopular are positions that stem directly elite interests. and in trying to address this question and of course at least in theory in liberal supposedly democratic societies where you don't have official censorship, unlike under authoritarian regimes where you have direct state repression and in societies such as ours, supposed to have freedom of expression, supposed to have diversity of opinions the marketplace of ideas, but is it that so often we do fall in line? and i think this is obviously the media in propaganda come in to play and ed and noam tried to of course they deliberately took this phrase manufacturing consent from the films liberal journalist walter lippmann whom nathan and no mention in the book. and by the way i put a quick plug for the book it is it is a page. i got an advance copy f

department of education to investigate the universities that are deemed to be not in compliance, and that includes san jose state. you might recall last september, the spartans volleyball coin made national headlines when she challenged a lawsuit essentially challenging the ncaa policy, which at the time allowed transgender women to compete in women's sports. the president isolated and targeted san jose state, saying there was a player transgender on that team. now, the u.s. department of education says it will investigate san jose state for title nine violations. the university says it will cooperate with the federal investigation. so not just birds. tonight, health leaders on the peninsula confirmed the bird flu has been detected in a cat. it comes after the county recently confirmed the presence of bird flu in a backyard poultry flock. so it begs the question, should you be worried about your pets? nbc bay area's jocelyn moran spoke to the experts. san mateo county says this was a stray cat that was taken in by a family in half moon bay. experts say with bird flu, there are precautions you should be taking. tonight, san mateo county confirming bird flu was detected in

university of phoenix. i am a shannon bream tragedy of the potomac we get into details about the deadliest air disaster in this co

to pace university school of law and an international law certificate from the university college of london faculty of laws. kash began his career as a public defender in florida where he led or co-led more than 60 jury taught -- jury trials in state and federal court. he demonstrated a devotion to upholding the rule of law defending the rights of individuals. he led the defense of jose per drago in the united states versus but drago. a high profile case in florida and 2015. he was one of the colombian nationals arrested in a major drug bust involving operation background. he and his cocounsel successfully argued that key evidence was withheld by the prosecution, leading to his release. i suspect some of his disdain for prosecutorial misconduct stemmed from this experience. kash was hired as a senior counsel on the house permanent select subcommittee on intelligence committee, i should say. in 2017. he distinctly remembers my friend comment shortly after they were introduced. he said in his dialect, kash, congress is where righteous investigations go to die. i hope you are ready. i think he was ready and he went on to establish a solid reputation for pursuing the facts and from

of thomas. >> jefferson. >> it was founding uva. he worried. >> that the republic. >> that. he co-founded was flawed. and if you didn't create a new universityrve. >> nine terms in the. >> house of representatives. >> as an ex-president. >> we're in a much lower station. >> he found a much higher calling. >> and became a leader of the abolitionist movement. >> cleveland obviously made. >> a comeback. >> taft. >> who wanted. >> nothing more than to become chief justice of the supreme. >> court. >> unfortunately suffered the fate of his wife, his brothers and theodore roosevelt, his. >> mentor and friend. >> wanting him to be president of the united states. so he kept turning down the supreme court. in the last ten. >> years of his life, he achieved his dream, and at the end of life, he gets. >> asked, does. >> he remember being president? and he says, no, i. don't remember being president. i finally have. achieved my dream. so his story is kind of. >> a lesson that a. dream deferred. >> doesn't need. >> to be a dream denied. your book, also topical because jimmy. carter is top of mind with his recent death and state funeral, where everyone wa

princeton university and author of several books, including his latest, we are the leaders we have been looking for, and melissa murray, professor of law at nyu and msnbc legal analyst and co-host of the strict scrutiny podcast. good morning to both of you. thank you for being here. melissa, you and i have had a conversation in an entirely different context about the chevron doctrine and the supreme court helping to dismantle the administrative state. and we always struggle with the idea that i think the average american doesn't really talk about the administrative state all that often, but it's the idea that we have agencies that are filled with experts that make determinations and come up with regulations. this is a continuation of that. this is a president chiming in with information he doesn't have, when in fact, we have an infrastructure that involves the ntsb and the faa that will get to the bottom of why that plane crashed, which is the reason why some of us will get on a plane today. and some of us got on planes yesterday and the day before, even after a major airplane crash. >> that's exactly right. >> ali. >> elena kagan. >> of the supreme. >> court has said. >>

university received bipartisan support with multiple republican co-sponsors. i urge my sensible colleagues on the other side of the aisle to support efforts like this and increase the resiliency of our federal work force and help with our competitive edge in the face of these growing threats. thank you, and i yield back. mr. tonko: thank you. we appreciate your participation this evening and for your work as a scientist and engaging all of us in the importance of having unadulterated science policy and research done so we can move forward with the pure truth and science based and everyday based discussion. scientific integrity has its consequences. we're witnessing a troubling pattern. science and public health experts are being sidelined. the decision to purge members of the e.p.a. science advisory board and the scientific advisory committee is nothing short of a setback for scientific integrity. these panels exist to provide statutorily required, science driven reviews, not to solve as a revolving door for political agendas. we've seen what happened when we weaken those bodies by replacing experts with repre

co-founder of the nonprofit legal organization whistleblower aid. also with us to help provide that historical perspective is julian zelizer. he is a cnn political analyst and historian at princeton universityand author of the book in defense of partisanship. all right, mark, let's start with you, because trump says he is revoking your security clearance. i want to note your representing current and former federal employees in lawsuits against this administration. what is the direct impact of this? >> well good morning. so first, i have received no official notification from the u.s. government. all i know is what the new york post responded or reported based on some leak, apparently, from the white house. but, you know, let's let's be clear. while i'm honored to be among the other individuals on that list, unlike all of them, i am not a democrat. i have never worked inside the federal government. i have never been in an elected or an appointed federal official, other than as an advisor on a national archives foia committee. i'm being retaliated against for being a lawyer, doing my job representing federal employees, and the harm that predominantly happens is actually not to me. it's to all