university and the founder of robust.ai and geometric.ai, startups acquired by uber. in edinburgh, atoosa kasirzadeh, director of research at the university of edinburgh's center for technomoralures. and in los angeles, ramesh srinivasan, a professor at the university of california and founder of the digital cultures lab research group. gary, let's go to you first. you signed this open letter. tell us why. >> perfect, let me start with that. i don't actually expect it to be a moratorium, but i think the situation is urgent, and i think the letter has gotten this on everybody's agenda, and that's terrific. i don't actually think machines are too smart. i think they're too unreliable and untrustworthy. they make up stuff all the time. somebody just committed suicide after their dialogue with the chatbot. i think there are all kinds of dangers here. maybe they'll be too smart eventually. i don't think they are now, but they're already being widely adopted. there's almost no regulation, and the corporates are fairly irresponsible about it, in my view. and so, this is a perfect storm. and so, even though i don't expect a pause per se, i think that we really need to look at what we

university and the founder of robust a i and geometric a. i start ups acquired by ober in edinburgh, a to circus design. director of research at the university of edinburgh center for tech. no morrow, futures. and in los angeles, ramesh train of austin, a professor at the university of california and founder of the digital cultures lab research group. gary, let's go to you 1st. you signed this open letter, tell us why let me start with that. i don't actually expect to be a moratorium, but i think the situation is urgent. and i think the letter has gotten this on everybody's agenda and that's terrific. i don't actually think machines are too smart, i think you're too and reliable, non trustworthy and make up stuff all the time. somebody just committed suicide after the dialogue with a chat. but i think there are all kinds of dangers here. maybe they'll be too smart eventually. i don't think they are now, but they're already being widely adopted. there's almost no regulation in the corporate are fairly irresponsible about it, might you? and so this is a perfect storm. and so even though i don't expect a pause, per se, i think that we really need to look at what w

a to circus is sadie, is director of research at the center for tick normal moral futures at the university of edinburgh. she explains how the voice cloning technology is being used, especially in technology, a voice chronic and gets a few seconds of someone's voice sample. and then there are some 3 platforms, a i platform, i'll add out there. so you can just input is free a few seconds of someone sample. and then you can produce and, and basically a digital copy of and someone's voice is on the case that in a few seconds, we add some of these technologies can produce a, like a copy of your voice where you are giving get very sophisticated kind of speech and as cameras actually don't want that kind of like, and that kind of voice connie produce. so what they really want is that they want to produce a voice ado. so copy voice of someone else, which is which sounds like it is basically that person is producing a couple of sentences and shows that this person is in a complicated situation. so at the moment, the cutting edge technologist can do that in a couple of minutes. and, and so it's, it's something c

reynolds, al, jazeera santa clara, california, until the cost of that is the rank her research center hotel, the moral futures, the university of edinburgh. she explains the ethics behind the development of the technology. one of the very complicated issues here is that you can use this technology, you can make that that produces technology and you can use them for group purposes and you can use them for bad purposes, right? so there's been like this whole one of interest in 3 ways, right? innovation is great. innovation advances, humanity. many people make historical arguments that always innovation has resulted in the progress of mankind. so philosophy historian, question this issue, and you need to produce the 3 case studies to make sure whether pacific kind of technology a result in the progress of humanity or not. but at the moment, but because of this like troll innovation attitude in many countries, a number of some numbers in countries as well. then there hasn't been like regulations. and so the idea has been data regulation. com, wendy's technology come out and after technology is our, our, then we take some time to, to regulate

all right, to the customers i days director of research at the center for fact, no moral futures at the university of edinburgh joined us now from edinburgh. good . have you with a so 1st of all, how is this technology any different from the one that already exists? that is used to create deep faith videos. yeah. so and kind of like i say most cloning is an extension or an advanced version of the, of producing the fake. basically the fake includes some content just called synthetic data. and the same type of data can we produce in many different ways. we can have video, the fake, or we can have fake, we can have take the face, etc. but technology. oh boy, connie gets a few seconds of some one more sample. and then there are some 3 platforms, a platform out there. so you can just input this free few seconds, someone samples and then you can produce and, and basically a digital copy of and someone's voice. so the real time is, this is what you're saying. so if i, if i have this technology, i can then i can talk for minutes, 4 hours and everything i say sounds like i'm a 2 so not sammy. yes. so, and it's a very,

california that to so because there's that i is right research on the center for techno moral futures at the university of edinburgh. she explains the ethics behind the development of this technology. what is the very complicated issue here is that you can use this technology, you can make it produces technologies and you can use them for good purposes, and you can use them for bad purposes, right? so there's been like this whole one of interest in 3 innovation, right? innovation is great. innovation of assets, humanity, many people make historical arguments and always innovation has resulted in the progress of mankind. so last history with the question, the issues and you need to produce the 3 case studies to make sure whether pacific kind of technology a result in the progress of humanity or not. but at the moment, but because of this, like pro innovation attitude in many countries and number some numbers in countries as well, then there hasn't been like regulations. and so the idea has been data regulation. com, wendy technology come out and after technology is our, our, then we take some time to, to regulate. o