are and i'm joined now by natasha she is a political scientist at the university of essex professor it's good to have you on the show so what we're looking at today a breach of the nuclear deal is this a dangerous development. what's definitely a dangerous development and i think it's something that european countries in particular the european union that had worked so hard to try to get the 20 good deal in place was hoping would not have been i think they were working really hard behind the scenes to try to creating some sort of bartering system that would enable countries to trade with iran but it wasn't really set up that way it was only set up to deal with humanitarian goods and supplies and whatever they tried to put together at the last minute using sort of creative methods that just didn't work iran said it really wasn't a feeling its needs and so now iran has put europe in a corner where there's really not that much that europe can do it can't really go against the u.s. and i don't see it going against us and doing something to really challenge the u.s. but it also has to make a

brent: i am joined by natasha lindstaedt, a political science at the university of essex. at we are looking at today, a breach of the nuclear deal, is this a dangerous devevelopment? natasha: what's definitelely a dangerouous development. and i ththink it is something tt european countries in particular , the europeanan union, that had worked so harard to o try to gee 2015 d deal in place was hoping would not happen. i think they were working hard behind the scenes to t try to create somome sort of ordering syststem that -- bartering systm that would enable countries to trade with iran but it was onlyy seset up to d deal with humanann goods and supppplies. and, whenever ththey try to put together thehe last minute using creative m methods, justt didn'o rk. iran said it was n not fulfillig its needsds. and so, now iran has put europe in a corner, where there is really not much europe canan d. it cannonot really go against te u.s. i don't ca doing something -- see it doing something to challenge the u.s., but i it alo has to make a stance against iran. and already th eu.k. ha

government at the university of essex thanks very much for being with us just on that vote to mean it how do you expect that to play out. well i think it is unprecedented and as a reporter had already stated because the house has has never really voted to condemn in a resolution the words of a president before and it is forcing republicans to go on record in the past republicans have always defended trying to reporters well not go at ghana's so far as to say well he's right to say the sort of things they've just tried to sidestep it or say as they have in this instance oh this is really about politics or they the policies of these 4 congresswomen have been divisive and try to place blame on the democrats so this gets the republicans in a corner they will have to vote on this and this will show up on their record and they may not want it on their record that they are tacitly complying to the types of statements that trump has been saying interesting that so far as you as you mentioned there's not been any concept particular in the higher echelons of the republican party and some republ