and that joining us from birmingham deputy dean of government at the university of ethics and also co author of the book democracies and authoritarian regimes. natasha, thank you so much for your time. as i read through that lift or just thought so much of it hinges on the nuclear feel, doesn't it? because if the economy with the important issue for iranian people who did vote, the economy can be repaired. if that deal comes through. if the sanction lifted. right, and i think it's not that clear what racy will be able to do to impact whatever happens with the nuclear deal. and the one hand, there are talks going on in vienna, dividing administration is open to returning to the deal. but the iranian regime has said publicly that they want some sort of grand gesture from the u. s. and it's not clear that the binding ministration is going to do anything that will satisfy that. and so in terms of the impact of this particular election, i don't see in what way it's going to push the needle one way or the other. we do know of course, right? you see says he wants to return to the deal, but h

these issues with natasha and joining us from birmingham deputy dean of government at the university of ethics and also co author of the book democracies and authoritarian regimes. natasha, thank you so much for your time. as i read through that lifted a thought so much of it hinges on the nuclear feel, doesn't it? because if the economy with the important issue for iranian people who did vote, the economy can be repaired. if that deal comes through, if the sanction lifted. right, and i think it's not that clear what racy will be able to do to impact.

of whether we know enough about the vaccine's effect on children. in this article from the news website the conversation, three ethics experts at the university of oxfordtors and pfizer, though, say they are satisfied they have adequately assessed the risks. and after millions of american children have now been vaccinated, that conclusion hasn't changed. the final question mark against vaccinating children right now, well, that ties to the biggest question of them all — how to stop this pandemic globally? because if that is the goal, the un's children's charity, unicef, is clear. at some point, no doubt we will need to vaccinate under 18s. but the priority at this moment has to be making sure that all of the vulnerable and priority groups around the world get vaccines. and that argument very much matches the who mantra of, "no—one's safe until everyone's safe." but just as we've seen with climate change many times, it is perhaps a little naive to expect global considerations to immediately trump the considerations of national leadership. senior uk politicians, past and present, acknowledge this. the priority will always be first to get your own country

of whether we know enough about the vaccine's effect on children. in this article, from the news website the conversation, three ethics experts at the university of oxfordhough, say they are satisfied they have adequately assessed the risks, and after millions of american children have now been vaccinated, that conclusion has not changed. the final question mark against vaccinating children right now, well, that ties to the biggest question of them all — how to stop this pandemic globally? because if that is the goal, the un's children's charity unicef is clear. at some point, no doubt, we will need to vaccinate under—18s. but the priority at this moment has to be making sure that all of the vulnerable and priority groups around the world get vaccines. and that argument very much matches the who mantra of no—one's safe until everyone's safe. butjust as we have seen with climate change many times, it is perhaps a little naive to expect global considerations to immediately trump the considerations of national leadership. senior uk politicians, past and present, acknowledge this. the priority will always be first to get your own country vaccinated, and we

discuss this further now with claire finkelstein, who's faculty director of the center for ethics and the rule of law, the university of pennsylvania. and she's joining us via skype from philadelphia. thank you very much for being with us. a bit complicated for, for some of us who are not, you know, into these legal matters and help us understand oldest claire, if you can this decision by the high court in pennsylvania today saying that because we didn't get a fair trial was this because of a technicality or more of a more risk extensive issue. you can see it as a technicality, but in some sense it also goes to a very substantive issue in our criminal justice system, which is the issue of immunity in order to get witnesses to cooperate. very often a prosecutor will or someone taking a deposition in the civil case will grant immunity to a will and will say that if you agree to testify, we will not prosecute. and that is what cause b believe happened in his case. he has argued that he had an immunity because of a deposition that he thought for a whole case. and the trial court had rejected that claim. it had gone all

and to discuss this now i'm joined by theo, for he's a professor of health care ethics at the protestant theological university in grow again in the data lines. it's good to have you on the program. i understand you used to be a supporter of assisted suicide, assisted dying, but now you are a critic. why is that? i was a supporter in the sense that and, and still am in the sense that i'm a democrat and i think we have to respect their wishes the wishes of people do die . however, what changed by mind and i saw personally 4000 cases of euthanasia in my country. what has made me change my mind is that i think that the supply of euthanasia really has stirred the demand. if you reckon that in about 2000 the year, 2000, we had about 2000 cases. and now we up to $7000.00 with a tendency to still go up further. so i think that is strange because we live in an age where palliative care means to alleviate the suffering have never been as good as they are now. but mister, let me, let me ask you these 4000 cases that you mentioned. did you ever see any one there who chose to end his or her life? do it in voluntarily? i m

university of michigan. engaging with scholars across the board. . . . . the more i see a radical parts of ethics you have carver who is known to be content and addition of immanuel kant and more consequentialist and they engage with each other and one worry i have is that it's not true when it comes to political he polarized topics and they are harvard yale ucla university of florida they all lean one way so that's really the problem. >> earlier in your career you were resetting engineering before he decided to embrace the philosophy as your discipline and you know you do offer relative optimism about the state of the hard scientist yet as you know there is a perception particularly on scientific questions that are increasingly leather sized or also it goes beyond what its position and i'm pleading guilty about something i was talking about earlier on. when you think about the amount of public funding that goes into some domain it does seem as though it might shape the incentive than it might shape scientific discourse as well. when you're talking about the standpoint of system knowledge in talk

universalism. the decline of those ideas led to the decline in politics and ethical openness and other problems. if it is the only source of ethical value that you have, you have days without asking maybe we can reinterpret this if it had access to another ethical ground. >> the door that opens onto acceptance of wisdom from other sources certainly has something to do with acknowledging the common humanity and once that happens, the possibility grows not just accepting and believing that you can contribute to others that are not of your faith but something else. i'm an admirer of another and it's clear mohammed was well acquainted but then if it was a stronger influence than christians that were near the area there was one answer to that is they also accepted jesus as the messiah but did not accept him as god and so that may have led to that reason where mohammed became. later in the book we hear of how in the intellectual muslim history it was powerfully influential upon those who acknowledged his indebtedness and also the scholastic philosophies at the new universities that came into existence

this article, three ethics experts talk at the university of oxford that.demic globally. if that is the goal, the un children is clear. that goal, the un children is clear. at some point, we will need to vaccinate _ some point, we will need to vaccinate under a teens and the priority— vaccinate under a teens and the priority at— vaccinate under a teens and the priority at this moment has to be making _ priority at this moment has to be making sure that all of the vulnerable and priority groups around — vulnerable and priority groups around the world get vaccines. and that matches _ around the world get vaccines. 9ch that matches the mantra around the world get vaccines. 9:1c that matches the mantra of around the world get vaccines. 9.1c that matches the mantra of no one is safe until everyone is safe. but just as we have seem with climate change, it is a bit naive to consider global considerations would trump the considerations of national leadership. senior uk politicians past and present acknowledge this. the priority will always be first to get your own

university of chicago, he had covid in november and has a whopping amount of antibodies. we are in the process of asking for vaccine exceptional and potential basis of medical harm. this is from a medical and ethicalspective i know a ano-brainer. they end up getting harmed, this is the liabilities of the institutions will have to absorb. this is really not an approved vaccine and we are rushing this through very fast in an unprecedented situation where many people are already naturally affected. i think it's a colossal error. >> tucker: i think you make a compelling case. very quickly, if i can be personal, if you don't get a medical exemption or your son doesn't what then? >> well that's a good question. we will cross that bridge when we get to it, but i certainly, having a serology is measured again and i would not be opposed of his antibody levels drop to recommend that he get a booster shot. part of this will also be his own decision because he is an adult. but he has been following my recommendation so far. >> tucker: i think they are pushing the population into a difficult spot. lots of parents like you. thank you so much for coming on today. i appreciate it. i knew study on hydroxychloroqui

ethics lawyer under president george w. bush and now teaches corporate law at the university of minnesota and is author of the book americanut the destruction of the rule of law in america. richard, thanks for being with us, first, your reaction to flynn's comments, and his walkback? >> well, ana, this is a call for a coup. and this is not the first time that michael flynn has done this. back in november, after the election, he met with donald trump in the white house and they talked about having a military takeover with the united states military, entering pennsylvania and other states to redo the election. that was sedition. and i wrote at the time that that was sedition and should have been criminally charged as sedition. by michael flynn, and also, perhaps, donald trump as an accomplice. mark for iden michael flynn has repeatedly called for a military take over of this sort. this is sedition and it can be prosecuted as sedition, a pattern of conduct, particularly the overt acts in the white house back in november, not just one statement here. >> right. >> second, general flynn as a retired from active duty, subject to

university school of law. her program focuses on voting rights andelections , money in politics and ethics, redistricting and representation, government dysfunction, maybe we will hear a little bit about that. rule of law and fair courts. she founded and directed the programs rights and elections project directing litigation, research and advocacy efforts to enhance political participation and event disenfranchisement. miss weiser received her jd from yale law school. she's served as a law clerk to thehonorable eugene nickerson . of the united states district court for the easterndistrict of new york . you are recognized for five minutes. >> thank you chairman nadler, vice chair and ranking member fischbach and members of the subcommittee, thank you for the opportunity to testify on strengthening the voting rights act which is one of the foundational text of america and a critical bulwark against discrimination in our voting system . unfortunately, in the years since the supreme court gutted the laws most powerful provision , their clearance requirements it has become clear the remaining provisions are simply not strong en

universities want students to be vaccinated to come back on campus. a lot of people discussed whether they have a right to. whether private employers have a right to. i think they do. >> no question they do. ethically it's a reasonable thing to do. i think legally there's no question that they do, although there is some chance that they will get sued. this is happening in a hospital in houston that has required all 25,000 of their employees to be vaccinated. about 100 of them have chosen not to and have started suing the hospital. the hospital has put folks on unpaid leave and is beginning to move toward letting them go in a couple weeks if they don't begin the vaccination process. certainly for a hospital, that's a perfectly reasonable thing to do. in the workplace, it's a pretty hard thing for an employer to do. i personally would be in favor of employers requiring vaccination and not allowing unvaccinated people to come back until they are vaccinated or requiring that the unvaccinated people wear masks all the time inside. it's very, very tricky. that's a reasonable and legal thing to do. >> let's look at what is happening globally. today president biden announced the u.s. will be donating 500 m

ethics reform package that democrats proposed. the legislation would require states to offer at least 15 days of early voting, universal access to mail-inould also make election day a national holiday. manchin said a partisan vote would divide the country more than it already is. jim clyburn is slamming senator man chin for saying he won't support this legislation. >> filibuster has very little value and should not have any value when it comes to constitutional rights. voting rights are basically constitutional rights. the filibuster even in tradition, extend debate on legislative question. for the people act, sure. if you want to vote against it, then vote against it. but if you voting to keep me or anybody else from voting for it, that's the problem. and that's what joe manchin is doing here. >> right. >> one vote against the for the people act and that's fine. but what he's doing now is aiding and abetting a process that keeps democratic principles from taking place. >> pretty strong words there. other democrats speaking out against manchin include congressman jamal bowman compares the west virginia democrat to the senate's republica

of whether we know enough about the vaccine's effect on children. in this article from the news website the conversation, three ethics experts at the university of oxfordhere — not yet in the uk, i should emphasise, but we've seen criticism of the prospect. guardian columnist gaby hinsliff argues: for its part, the g7 would no doubt point to the billions that are being committed to vaccine programmes in the developing world. but think back to that tweet from joe biden. he wants to vaccinate children to restrict the delta variant in the us. 0k. but then listen to former us president bill clinton talking to the bbc. i think the g7 has a big obligation to get this vaccine out as quickly as possible to poorer countries. look at all of these variants that keep coming up. all this is gonna come back to the uk and the united states. now, bill clinton is not criticising joe biden here — and i should note as president biden arrived at the g7, he confirmed the us will provide 500 million pfizerjabs to other countries by next year. however, every leader knows there are not enough vaccines at the moment and that variants are a threat, and there is an inevitable te

university, focuses on social justice and ethical matters related to aids. he authored a paper describing what doctors experienced when no effective treatments were available for 15 years. iink people forget the difficulty of the suffering that came before them. we had made remarkable progress . i think it would be a terrible mistake to get the devotion of the doctors and the nurses. currently, therapy helps patients live longer lives while lowering transmission rates. a daily pill prevents those at high risk from getting infected . still, 37,000 people are diagnosed with hiv each year and around 1 million are living with hiv in the u.s.. >> this is a disease that continues to exist and one for which there is no vaccine and one for which there is no cure. >> reporter: just like with the covid vaccine, the government, the medical community, and the public need to work together. >> the covid epidemic has shown us that there was nothing we can do. we need to end aids now. >> so no more lives are lost. michael george, cbs news, new jersey. >>> a new cdc study shows that new annual hiv infections have decreased 73% from the beginning of the aids epidemic to now. health officials say this is because of the work

of whether we know enough about the vaccine's effect on children. in this article from the news website the conversation, three ethics experts at the university of oxfordis pandemic globally because if that is the goal, the children's charity unicef is clear. that that is the goal, the children's charity unicef is clear. at some oint no charity unicef is clear. at some point no doubt _ charity unicef is clear. at some point no doubt we _ charity unicef is clear. at some point no doubt we will _ charity unicef is clear. at some point no doubt we will need i charity unicef is clear. at some point no doubt we will need to l point no doubt we will need to vaccinate under 18. but the priority at this moment has to be making sure that all of the vulnerable and priority groups around the world get vaccines. find priority groups around the world get vaccines. �* ., ., , vaccines. and that argument very much matches _ vaccines. and that argument very much matches the _ vaccines. and that argument very much matches the who - vaccines. and that argument very much matches the who mantra l vaccines. and that argument very| much matches the who mantra of no—one is sa

on lectures and history, brown university professor megan nelson talks about a girl of warfare on both of the confederate and union sides during the civil war whose ethics included ambushes and surprise raids on unsuspecting troops and towns. sunday at 7 p.m. eastern, journalists and law professors show the definitions of free speech in the united states and explore whether france's model would work in the u.s. and sunday at 8 p.m. eastern on the presidency, a discussion about nancy reagan's legacy with "washington post" columnist author of the triumph of nancy reagan and white house historical association president stuart exploring the american story. watch american history tv this weekend. >>> broadband and telecommunications representatives testified before the senate subcommittee on broadband access and building resilient networks. questions focused on access in rural areas and wireless communication issues after an extreme weather events like wildfires.