the actual on your gum, are political economists in senior lecture at the university of john a mar before the break. we were discussing the origins of the long process as well as of the global economic crisis. and while it's natural, anything logical to blame it on the sitting government. i wonder if there any internationally accepted economic dogmas that gary is governments feel obliged to comply with, but that simply don't work anymore is the global economy or national economies still function according to the laws and the rules that i taught and the department of economics no i think we have seen that, but it's economics departments in my country all in much of the world, they are unable to either predict or provide viable solutions and race forward to the economic crises that yeah, seen. in fact, they believe that markets clear that markets themselves will solve these problems. and that ideology is also behind the policies that are recommended and put forward and forced given on many good low countries by the international monetary fund. and the world bank and no liberal institutions.

john tong at the university of— constituencies. johnes today and the next few days pan out? i think we will certainly see ed davey get his hammer out, we saw with the tweets that he would basically be doing that earlier this evening and we knew that�*s how he won because he was saying we will need a bigger hammer referring to the blue wall so will see keir starmer, without doubt, in wakefield. the prime minister i doubt we will see much of. he is in rwanda for the commonwealth conference. he will do a pull clip, i�*m sure, and he will be asked about this and he will be asked about this and i�*m sure he will say, as will indeed his ministers, that this is a sort of midterm blues, the economy is struggling, they have struggled to get their message out there because of partygate. i think certainly that sort of works for the first by—election or the second one but the third one? fourth one? if you put these two together? it�*s more difficult. his mps will want an answer as to what the strategy is to get over this problem. because many of th

john tonge, from the university - the electorate. john tonge, from the university of hoviton. we are a bit. there are bigger rings. but more of i think both are very good results for the labour party, and the lib dems. the best result _ party, and the lib dems. the best result for _ party, and the lib dems. the best result for the _ party, and the lib dems. the best result for the lib - party, and the lib dems. tie: best result for the lib dems. in terms of the numerical swing. in terms of the size of the majority, in the sense they have never been competitive. but for both, very good result and has been saying, what they point to is the idea that you can see a very clear path to a non— conservative majority of the next election. as soon as they stop having a majority. it's very likely they are out of office. i think what's really striking about this in a way, if we transport ourselves back two years. we're going to have a situation in two years' time with the labour party takeback wakefield, a redwall seat on 12% swing, and the lib dems take north shropshire, and the

john mearsheimer, i really appreciate your willingness to provoke our thinking into bigger ways into different angles. of this, the set of challenges today. thanks so much for joining us. university of chicago professor of political science john mearsheimer. thank you. my pleasure, steve. so what's the bottom line? buckle up folks. things are going to get a lot worse. according to my guest today, who is one of the world's leading thinkers in the real school of foreign policy. here's how things are going to go down. one, america's going to invest deeply in trying to create strategic defeat for russia and ukraine, and to this will distract from china, which actually is a true here competitive united states. unlike russia, the result will be a dangerous and potentially crippling effect on americas status in place in the world. it's alliances and its ability to get its way. we can take bets on whether john mearsheimer is right or wrong, but if he is right, we're talking about a big turning point in history. just like the war in suez, egypt in 1956 back then the power and procedure, the united kingdom came crashing down once. and for all it's happened before the powerful, over extende

these other aspects of american politics that we are observing. john: hakim jefferson of stanford universityvery much. hakeem: my pleasure. thank you. ♪ john: finally tonight... the intersection of sports and geopolitics. today was the final round of the first ever liv golf series in london. the new competition is backed by the saudi government and its leader crown prince mohammed bin salman. saudi arabia's human rights record has been criticized over a number of issues, including the war in yemen, the treatment of lgbtq people and the murder of "washington post" columnist jamal khashoggi. now khashoggi's fiancÉe is weighing in, saying the participating golfers should be banned from major tournaments. "usa today" sports columnist christine brennan is here to talk about this. thank you for being with us. first off, just the basics. what is this new tournament and why is it so controversial? christine: what's happened is a man named greg norman, major champion winner from the past, has been working for quite a while with saudi leaders and certainly saudi money to come up with an alternative go

joining us for more is john curtice, professor of politics at the university of strathclyde. thank you for joining us. by your account, how close but the vote be? john: what way of looking at it as if more than 100 conservative mps voted against mr. johnson that would be relatively bad news. if it hands north beyond 120, that would be an indication his position is weaker than that of theresa may when she was challenged by a similar procedure in december 2019. as far as voters are concerned they have not learned anything new in the last 24 hours they did not know already. a couple of instant polls we have had asking whether or not the prime minister should resign are roughly the same numbers we were getting a week ago, around three pets of all voters think he should go. -- around 3/5 of all voters think you should go. it will not damage him with the public because that damage has already been done. the question is if tory mps see a prime minister many of their colleague still love have confidence in. to what extent will they be willing to back the prime minister when it comes t

of during the biden administration. and a professor with a university school of law. john, a senior editor for politico. he broke the story last month. this conservative supreme court has been in the making for decades, and while today might be shocking, or jarring. should we be surprised? wasn't this a game plan? >> not only was this the game plan, stephanie. but it has been telegraphed at every term. this was so clearly decades in the making. this was an undertaking that goes back to the sort of revolution that we are going to lose everything else, but if we take the court. we will ultimately win and in a deep deep way. i think when donald trump took office saying, i will do one thing right for all the things i do wrong, and that is transform the courts. i think we should've believed him because this was all happening in plain sight. nobody should be surprised. >> josh, as i said just a moment ago. you are the reporter who broke the story when there was a draft opinion a month ago. this decision, how close is it to the leaked draft? >> it's almost identical, stephanie. maybe a few small changes here a

joining me today is professor john barrett professor of law at the st. john's university, and fellow of the robert eight jackson fellow. he is the writer of the jackson list, a popular email newsletter and website. and editor of jackson's acclaimed 2003 posthumous book, quote that man. an insider portrait of franklin d. roosevelt. the last new deal insider memoir. also with us today ralph blumenthal distinguished lecturer from baruch college, continues to be a contributor to the times and other publications. author of five books, including the believer about the harvard psychologist john mack who investigated ufos an alien encounters. he actually has a very direct connection with fdr, we will talk about that in a minute. we will start with professor barrett, give us a little bit of your background specifically with your work on justice robert jackson. >> thank you, paul for this opportunity, and really the privilege to be at the roosevelt library at homestead in every sense except actual. the path that led me to all of this was really being a lawyer in washington at first

john kennedy, k american university of commencement address. and i to 63. he said that what the soviet suffered of world war 2 was the equivalent of the entire united states, east of chicago having been destroyed. mm. initially the plan to attack the u. s. l was code named trojan over time it evolved into pincher bush, lack of crank, shaft half moon coke wheel off tackle. and sherry a dia, december 19th, 1949, saw the adoption of the best known plan to wipe out the soviet operation dropshot date of attack. january the 1st 1957 mm. to plan outlined the complete annihilation of the usa under the democratic guise of liberating the nations from communism. that those very nations would be wiped out alone with communism. in the 1st phase of operation, dropshot and visited dropping 300 nuclear and 250000 tons of conventional bombs on the soviet union. in 100 soviet cities were pre selected as targets. the 2nd phase, the ussr is attacked by 250 later divisions. so we thought that taken over by nato naval forces, the 3rd phase, annihilating the usaa wiping it off th

let's bring in professor of history or cal studies at johns hopkins university school of advanced international studies and associate at harvard university, mary elise sarrot. and with us military analyst former deputy commander of the united states european command and retired u.s. army lieutenant general stef twitty joins us. good to have you both with us today. and i'll first, general twitty, ask you a little bit about the state of nato right now after listen to the president's comments. i mean, this is a real turn around for the alliance. but also the significance of permanent u.s. troops now. and enhancing those troops. how much of a historic moment is for some european nations to have that happen? >> first of all, mika, it is great to see this alliance remain ironclad against russia. i will tell you that it is also impressive to see all of the things that have been committed of course there have been words not deeds yet. hopefully those deeds will come to fold. but if you take a look at u.s., we're going to bolster ore commitment in the east. we'll have rotational combat in romania and we

she is professor emeritus at the school of international studies at no room university and bristol, we cross to john t bara she is the deputy leader of the workers party of britain, an author of the drive to war against russia and china, or cross roads and effect that means you can jump in anytime you want. i always appreciate, let's go to the professor in new delhi. first. you get a lot of we did, we had the g 7 meeting and it's all west it all over western media talking about the great decisions the leaders are making. but in the global south, you folks don't take much notice anymore. why? correct? because you can see the balance, they've been to international meetings, one of the bricks and one of the g 7. and you see the difference in the narrative. g 7 was all about, you know, kind of militarism sanctions targeting are the exclusions. whereas bricks was all about global development cooperation, you know, financial linkages, open invasion. i know how, how do you see that? because, you know, when, when we had the brakes meeting here. i just as we heard from the professor in new delhi and they're

of during the biden administration. and a professor with a university school of law. john, a senior editor for politico. he broke the story last month. this conservative supreme court has been in the making for decades, and while today might be shocking, or jarring. should we be surprised? wasn't this a game plan? >> not only was this the game plan, stephanie. but it has been telegraphed at every term. this was so clearly decades in the making. this was an undertaking that goes back to the sort of revolution that we are going to lose everything else, but if we take the court. we will ultimately win and in a deep deep way. i think when donald trump took office saying, i will do one thing right for all the things i do wrong, and that is transform the courts. i think we should've believed him because this was all happening in plain sight. nobody should be surprised. >> josh, as i said just a moment ago. you are the reporter who broke the story when there was a draft opinion a month ago. this decision, how close is it to the leaked draft? >> it's almost identical, stephanie. maybe a few small changes here a

she is professor americas at the school of international studies at neuro university. and in bristol, we cross to john t barra. she is the deputy leader of the workers party, a britain, an author of the drive to war against russia and china, or across our rules in effect. that means you can jump anytime you want. and i always appreciate it's going to the professor in new delhi 1st. you get a lot of we did, we had the g 7 meeting and it's all west it all over western media. talking about the great decisions the leaders are making. but in the global south, you folks don't take much notice anymore. why? correct? because you can see the balance. they've been to international meetings. one of the bricks and one of the g 7. and you see the difference in the narrative. g 7 was all about, you know, kind of militarism sanctions targeting the exclusions. whereas bricks was all about global development cooperation, you know, financial linkages open in beijing. i know how, how do you see that? because, you know, when, when we had the brakes meeting here, i just as we heard from the professor in new delhi and they

a moment off, remember, and let's speak to mac elani, who's a director of the center for african studies at johns hopkins university. he's joining us from baltimore, welcome to al jazeera. so this is of course a hugely significant day on the issue of cur, commercializing the day. are you concerned that june? tina is at risk of, of losing its meaning when i risk of losing its meaning. i think it is a long celebrated holiday in the black community and there was no need for the federal government to recognize it for us to celebrate it. i think what is at risk is that it becomes a marketing ploy. it becomes something vacuous that companies states or the government can say they're recognizing this is to struggle with this is start celebration and not really doing anything substantive. and i think the attempts to market it and to make it something that those empower can do to suggest that they are responding to the desires and demands like people really misses. kind of the concern to people had with the making martin luther king's birthday, a federal holiday where a number of communities protested businesses that stayed

and the soviet suffer. 27000000 deaths with john kennedy gave us the american university of commencement address in 1963. he said that what the soviet suffered of world war 2 was the equivalent of the entire united states, east of chicago having been destroyed. mm. initially the plan to attack the u. s. l was code named trojan over time it evolved into pincher bush, mega crankshaft, half moon, cold wheel off tackle. and sherry idea.

of pesticides has considerably damaged the soil. the magic disturbances add to these difficulties with intense heat and regular rainfall that sweep away crops. professor tone though from the university not be john believes that the countries and the state of emergency, the future of farmers is threatened. who does a new film dig, didn't and deeply analyze the percentage of human credits hole in his top 20 centimeters. no. this was cynthy's enormous info. we need to make a fairly serious diagnosis. you feel you're a multi disciplinary diagnosis, which takes into account the physical aspect. so she's going to make aspect and then arrive at the sustainable restoration plot. do i feel, you can women cassava, gro, was the village of basses in, have decided to experiment with establishing woodlands with the help of a local n g o. block, seneca southfield must be replaced each year. but diseases are multiplying due to salt impoverishment and global warming. that's why the women are now looking for new fertile plots and the few remaining force, the woodland allowed them to have healthy cassava plans to grow in the same field each year. the woman is satisfied with the harvest. today, a single heck of cu

of john f. kennedy and the myths that surround it. this video is courtesy of the university and is from their great mind lecture series. >> and welcome everybody to the last of our talks in the great presidential lives series. and john f. kennedy, surely one of the most intriguing and controversial american presidents. certainly a few of them have generated such diverse and partisan appraisals. as an example, one of the classes that i taught for many years was the u.s.

the john hopkins university of health, he joins us tonight. taking the politics out of it, roe v.t of it, just the science of us, we know that children in utero, fetuses, a developing human being in utero feels pain, correct? >> that's right. somewhere between 15 and 20 weeks babies will actually resist the instruments of abortion. roe is based on viability but viability has been changing. babies survive now at approximately the halfway point of pregnancy at 21 and 22 weeks, babies have survived outside the womb, so ironically we sometimes do fetal surgery inside the womb of the mother to save the baby's life and at the same age, now surgical instruments are used to abort a baby. there is a great irony and now you can barely talk about it. i witnessed it as a medical student and i will tell you it doesn't matter which side you protest on about this issue. if you see the actual images of what is happening at a baby resisting an abortion, it will weigh on your conscience. today you can barely talk about it, nurses can get fired if they don't participate, students are ridiculed. most

of gestation stress hormones dramatically rise in children. were knoedelseder used to draw their blood in utero? dr. marty makary is at johns hopkins university of public health. he joinsth us tonight. doctor , thanks so much for coming on . i mean, everything's kind take the politics out of it, rovi.ad way out of it. whether it should be legal ort not out just to the science of it. we know that children in utero fetuses, whatever you call the developing human being in utero feels pain correct fan that's right, tucker .e somewhere between 15 and 20 weeks babies will actuallysi resist the instruments of abortionts o. now roe is based on viability, but viability has been changing. obaby survive now at approximately the halfway point of pregnancyurur at twenty one d twenty two weeks. babies have survived outside the . so ironically, we sometimes do fetal surgery on a baby inside the that the mother to save the baby's life. and yet at the same age in other settings, surgical instruments are used to abort a baby. soor there'st a great irony and nowth you can barely talk about it. i witnessed it as a medical student. i'll tell you it doesn't matter

join us now, professor of political science at vanderbilt university john gear, and ph.d. ood to have you both. our colleagues recently launched a new way to measure unity in the united states. >> you know, john, i always -- back precovid when we would go out and talk to universities and civic groups, people would always ask how divided america was. i said idwell, if you watch cab news, if you look at -- if you're online, if you go on facebook, it's very divided. but mika and i, you know, , probably talked to hundreds of groups through the years, and we say the same thing in alabama as we say on the upper west side of new york, and people agree on the most part. they agree on like 80% of the things we talk about. we don't see that massive division. what did you find? t >> well, we found very consistent with what you just reported. the country first of all has always had some division. democracy is about adjudicating those disagreements. we've never been fully unified. and when you take a look at theh data, there's some reason for optimism. that's partly of what we're trying

cdc is handled this communication of course of this entire pandemic, lofgren and bring in doctor marty, fox news contributor professor john hopkins universitye and think you joining us on sunday evening, appreciate your time in the cdc, repeatedly dinged over the course of the pandemic with poor communication, this putting kylie and the harsh critics might say the agency has try to manipulate public instead of bet with the information test and so you to come out this week tomorrow how do you address the trust issue especially when it comes to protecting americans children. >> it only the cdc has been under a lot of criticism for having a messaging problem - we do not think they have a messaging problem, engages have a that policy problem and animate repeated consisted it listening mistakes, bad judgment and recommendations and are still pursuing a covid-19 zero strategy and if you look at the way the recommended the boosters and five - 11 -year-olds, which i just did, they voted to make a strong recommendation that 24 million kids, five - 11, get a booster shot based on the setting of 140 kids in the city did not even show any clinical outc

of john f. kennedy and the myths that surround it. this video is courtesy of the university and is from their great mind lecture series. >> and welcome everybody to the last of our talks in the great presidential lives series. and john f. kennedy, surely one of the most intriguing and controversial american presidents. certainly a few of them have generated such diverse and partisan appraisals. as an example, one of the classes that i taught for many years was the u.s. since world war ii. and on the first day of the class i would often ask the students, just for fun, a little quiz, a few questions, one of which was, who do you think was the greatest president since world war ii? and invariably, let answer was john f. kennedy. along that same line and on a larger scale, a few years ago, a reputable national survey asked respondents to decayed hubei believed to be the greatest all american president? kennedy was voted number one. ahead of such consensus as washington, and fdr. well, no. on the other side of that divide, there was, for a personal example, a time when i was goin

after victoria, john barrett, professor of law at st. john's university, world renowned expert on justice robert jackson, the elizabeth fellow, director of the robert h jackson center which is a co-sponsor of this event. author of forthcoming books on justice jackson and creator of the jackson list which gives me great joy. if you want to subscribe to the jackson list, email professor barrett. after professor barrett we have michelle goodwin, the chancellor professor at university of california irvine and founding director of the center of biotechnology and global health policy, arthur of the 2020 book policing the wound, invisible women and the common location of motherhood and she hosted a podcast on the issue. lastly, melissa murray, professor of law at new york university. the cohost of strict scrutiny, an expert on family law, reproductive rights, author of the 2022 william and mary article, abortion, sterilization in the universe of reproductive rights. we could not have a better group of scholars today talking about all these issues and how it rela

the society of black alumni presidential professor professor of history and a professor at the snf agora institute at the johns hopkins university. she is the author of the pathbreaking vanguard. how black women broke barriers won the vote and insisted on equality for all as well as birthright citizens a history of race rights in antebellum america. it's such an honor to welcome this superb panel of scholars, and i'm also thrilled that the moderator for tonight's program is my wonderful colleague lana ulrich senior director of content at the center. she does so much to make all of our programming possible and over to you llama. great. thank you so much jeff for that wonderful introduction. thank you to everyone here attending this wonderful seminar, and i'm so looking forward to this conversation with these wonderful scholars we have tonight. so professor collier thomas, i'd like to start with you and i'd like to ask you about your landmark volume african american women and the vote which begins in 1837 with the first anti-slavery convention of american women, which was an interracial gathering of women held in new york to defin

university . he has served as chair of the federal judicial conference committee for proctors and procedure, appointed by chief justice john roberts. he has taught constitutional law and other legal subjects at a number of universities and his teaching at several universities right now. one benefit to the pandemic is that we have zoom and other forms of online education so students are able to pass judge sutton as a professor without them having to be here. so that is a tremendous benefit to the legal academy. judge sutton, thank you for being here thank you for talking about your new book. just in general justice scalia's influence on you individually. >> first of all thank you alan for inviting me. it's great to be here live. not on the zoom. i'm really glad we're here and being cautious and so forth. it's really i have a lot of fond memories of coming to montgomery. i feel in a lotof ways as if my career got started here . soon after i left the ohio general's office then attorney general bill pryor hired me to handle several cases in the us supreme court and happily hedid not yet have a solicitor general so that was my

after victoria we have john barrett who is a professor of law at st. john's university. a world renowned expert on justice robert h jackson he is the elisabeth of fellow and director of the robert h jackson center which is a cosponsor of this event. he hasn't author forthcoming books on nuremberg and biography of justice jackson. he is the creator of the jackson list which gives me great joy. if you want to subscribe to the jackson list you should e-mail professor barrett. : : barrett, we have michelle goodwin who is the chancellor' : leadership network and the hocohost of the world famous podcast strict scrutiny. an expert on family law, constitutional law and reproductive rights and the author of the 2022 william and mary law review article abortion sterilization and the universe of reproductive rights. we could not have a better group of scholars today talking about all these issues and about how it relates to the current debates on the reproductive rights. honored to be here and i'm going to sit back and let the analysts do their things. >> thank you for that introduc

the supreme court and in our democracy >> mary ziegler of the university of california davis law school. thk you very much. >> thanks, john. >> we are going to hear from leaders on both sides of this issue about what comes next. firs i'm joined by marjorie dannenfelser. she is the president of the susan b. anthony pro-life america. what is your reaction of the antiabortion movement? how much of a victory is this? >> for pro-life, this is the culmination of the greatest human rights movement of our time. and every abortion, there are two that must beerved. in 1973 when they wereold this has been -- this would be the great liberator, it has not been. now when the states and congress, every elected body will be able to discuss this issue in the plic square. the merit of the arguments will be made out in a way that was not required 50 years ago and the will of the people will make its way into the law and women will be served in ways that they deserve. >> you told another reporter today, you said that you and others will work to ban abortion in every state and every legislature including the congress. is your goal to ban abor

oprah about the life of henrietta lacks this black woman who passes from the scene approximately 70 years ago. unbeknownst to her a physicians and medics at johns hopkins university hospital in baltimore. take some of her cells that they are still using. to develop various therapies for all manner of diseases and what's interesting, is that the world health organization brought attention to this. as well they brought attention to the ongoing lawsuit. that the family of henrietta lacks is bringing against gems hopkins and other miscreants. and i dare say that this international pressure. that was exhibited a few days ago in switzerland at the headquarters of the world health organization. hit it by the physician and microbiologists we become familiar with during the course of the pandemic speaking of dr. tatros with roots and cigarette province and ethiopia because of the spotlight that he was able to shine on this crime against the black's family. it'll probably be very useful in a recovery a legal recovery. that is to say damages that the family will be able to recuperate. so once again, i think that what was lost when you had the sidelining and the marginalizin