we've had shoot out on front row at the university of minnesota. we're desperately calling for more police officers to deal with that. but are people should people be allowed to bring a concealed weapon on our campus? how about onto an airplane? is that now going to be a constitutional right? would people board an airplane in the united states to carry concealed weapon? how far is this going to go? and i believe the court has been very unreasonable here, not allowing the states to impose regulations that are reasonable when the 2nd amendment itself refers to a well regulated militia. i'm hoping that this court will stop here, at least, and not go further. as i say, could we have future cases where students and staff are suing for the right to bring a concealed weapon on to the campus of the university of minnesota to deal with our escalating gun violence. will there be a right, a constitutional right right to take a gun on an airplane. i mean, how far is this going to go before? the supreme court realizes that they have infringed upon the right of

that's what you paint a law professor at the university of minnesota. i flop. thank you. oh, so by to breaking use out of brussels in the posse minutes, president vladimir zalinski has tweeted, welcoming the decision to grant you cray, the candidate status. he says, ukraine's future is within the e u a. let's get some reaction from cave. now across wouldn't chelsea profit is dining by for us there. and so this is the news that many in ukraine have been waiting for. that's right, neck being described as a historical moment. as you mentioned, presidents zalinski tweeted a few minutes ago. i just give you a bit more of his tweet. he said we sincerely commend the e u leaders decision. as you mentioned, it's a unique historic moment in you ukraine relations and we are grateful to you leaders for their support. let's put a little bit of this in context shell away. it's been a long time since this country started pushing for better relations, closer relations with the european union because she mind back to 2004, it started with what was described as the orange revolution that wa

sure, it is. >> ed with the university of minnesota, thank you very much >> thank you >>> and a latteing a consumer slowdown we'll hit that call and more in today's "three-stock lunch." ad before investing consider the fund's investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses. go to flexshares.com for a prospectus containing this information. read it carefully. (vo) hi. we're visible. a new kind of wireless company. started by this company. (hi, dad.) for a prospectus containing this information. other companies pay for stores. which means you pay for stores. but this is our store. which means you get a single line unlimited plan... for as low as $25 a month. switch today at visible dot com. at fidelity, your dedicated advisor will help you create a comprehensive wealth plan for your full financial picture. with the right balance of risk and reward. so you can enjoy more of...this. this is the planning effect. >>> time for today's three stock lunch. we look at some of today's biggest movers roku shares jumping on rumors of an acquisition potentially by netflix. however, sources tell c

he is a law professor now at the university of minnesota. mr. brainers good to see you again. i'll ask you what i asked you last time we spoke about where we're going with these hearings. the testimony that we heard yesterday from this 26 year old white house aid, who does not have an extra grind. you has everything to lose your test for testimony under oath. is it what is needed for the justice department to serious lee consider charging donald trump with maybe sedition or seditious conspiracy to overthrow the government? well, i would certainly hope so. i was hoping that the department of justice would be a lot further along by now than they apparently are. we'll see what happens here. but this is yet more evidence that donald trump knew that this crowd was violent. this crowd was heavily armed. he was told they were heavily armed because these people in the crowd were not going to pass through the metal detectors to get close to the white house. even though donald trump got very upset about that, says, of course, let them in with a weapons. they're not here to hurt me. they

he's now a professor of corporate law at the university of minnesota, professor painter. it is good to see you again. unfortunately under these circumstances, but i have to throw it at the hearing that took place last night. it took place during prime time. the expectations were high, did the committee deliver well, the committee was exposed to the facts, at least some of the facts about january sex and the answer action. lot of these facts we already know, but we saw video coverage of the insurrection that we had never seen before. and also testimony from the attorney general, the united states, the former attorney general william bar officer, explicitly told president trump it lost the election. and they did not have a legal ground to stand on challenging the election, was all of them. and that, of course, what instigated all as president trump sanity for over 2 months to overturn the results until actually when those results were really quite clear. and this was a very dramatic hearing for sure. but ultimately the question is going to be whether for president trump or

he's now a professor of corporate law at the university of minnesota professor painter. it is good to see you again. unfortunately under these circumstances. but i have to throw it at the hearing that took place last night. it took place during prime time . the expectations were high. did the committee deliver well, the, the committee, i exposed the facts, at least some of the facts about january sex and the insurrection. lot of these facts we already know, but we saw video coverage of the insurrection that we had never seen before. and also testimony from the attorney general, the united states, the former attorney general william bar officer, explicitly told president trump that he had lost the election. and they did not have a legal ground to stand on challenging the election was all of them. and that, of course, what instigated all as president trump senator, for over 2 months to overturn the result is on election lee. when those results were really quite clear, and this was a very dramatic hearing for sure. but ultimately the question is going to be whether. ready a

richard painter is a professor at the university of minnesota law school and former chief ethics lawyer for president george w bush. he says the evidence presented by the committee shows the capital attack was well planned to overturn election results. message is that this was a clear, intentional, deliberate, well plan effort to overthrow the logic state government. the united states government, the government set forth in our constitution. we. ready elect the president every 4 years. and donald trump in his desperate desire to claim to power spread the rumor, the. busy false blame that somehow he had won an election that he had lost weight 1000000 votes. his own attorney general told him he lost the election. that was obvious, that is a back. and yet he sought to play the power and he instructed the justice department to issue opinions that the election, but somehow fraudulent attorney general bar resigned. and then president trump still insisted on trying to get those opinions. he pressured the military. he plan to use the military to intervene and hold the election again. he uh then

he's a professor at the university of minnesota law school on former chief fx lawyer for president george w. bush, welcome to al jazeera sir. thanks for speaking to us. i'd like to get your take on whether these hearings actually make a difference. but 1st, just give me your initial thoughts on the hearing. and what do you think the takeaway message was? the message is that this was a clear, intentional, deliberate, well plan effort to overthrow the united states government, the united states government, the government set forth in our constitution. we elect the president every 4 years . and donald trump in his desperate desire to cling to power spread the rumor, the. busy false flame that somehow he had won an election, they had lost 8000000 boats. his own attorney general told them he lost the election. that was obvious. that is a fact. and yet he sought to claim to power. and he instructed the justice department to issue opinions that the election, but somehow fraudulent attorney general bar resigned. and then president trump still insisted on trying to get those opinions. he pressured

she is a professor at the university of minnesota, where she teaches courses for the certificate administration. we are proud of our election system in minnesota. she earned her bachelor's degree from purdue university. senator blunt will now introduce our other two witnesses. i will swear in our witnesses and we will proceed to testimony. sen. blunt: thank you. if you brag more about the minnesota turnout you will just be repeating yourself. it is a thing to brag about and i'm glad you are able to do that. i'm glad all five of our witnesses are here. let me introduce secretary of state ardoin and mr. wesley wilcox. secretary ardoin has served as louisiana secretary of state since 2018, previously serving as the first assistant secretary of state eight years prior to that. a long time being near this job and doing this job he also currently serves as the president of the national association of secretaries of state and on the election infrastructure subsector coordinating council esther wilcox has served as a supervisor of elections for marion county, florida since 2012. another decade of servi

joining us now, professor of law at the university of minnesota. and emily, staff writer at the new york times magazine and fellow at the yale law school. and professor, let me begin with you and your reaction to the work of the amateur historians in the opinion. >> well, one thing -- there's a lot of things that we're striking. the majority opinion is almost unchanged from the leaked draft. alito's basic argument, as you said, is the same, what's the liberty of the constitution protects, we have to look at what price you would half in 1868, would a court of a have a pelt, i recognize the challenge to abortion in 1868, alito says no. so, you don't win. you don't have constitutional protection for abortion access now. i think there is at least two problems with this argument. first, actually, abortion that the chronological amongst americans's first generations it doesn't regulate, it doesn't criminalize criminalize abortions before quickening, which is the moment when a pregnant person first detects fetal movement, which can be as late as about 25 w

the democracy fund, and as an adjunct professor at the high school of public policy at the university of minnesota. i have worked in the election administration field for almost 20 years, and spent 11 of those years in maricopa county, arizona, most of them as the federal compliance officer, and i, two, am cera certified, as administrator will go to much. and i do -- as well as many across the country who are working across the aisle and across the myriad of facets of our election systems to ensure that officials have the tools and resources that they need to serve their voters well. as a representative of the election center to the elected states postal services mailers technical advisory committee, a bit of a mouthful, for over a decade, i have forged relationships that have aided the improvement of our postal system to better deliver democracy to the american voter. today i'd like to share with you what i'm hearing and seeing unfold for the primaries and the forthcoming in november midterm elections. my written testimony covers seven different topics from mike prepared comments, however, i'd li

people are removing their masks to eat and people are wearing them over the china study at the university of minnesotaworried about their chin it's ridiculous. i think there's a value to proper masking, eyewear and a 95 in the office and in certain circumstances the notion that the justice department should be involved on behalf of the cdc of reinstituting a mandate that never did anything is really, really disturbing that's what i wanted to come out and say. it's completely inappropriate. >> is inappropriate and it goes against certain values that we go against certain americans. yet the incredible spectacle of all these leaders that force these mandates, when they get together on their own they have these wild parties and the covid spread like wildfires, they're not following their own edicts, there's that problem with the american public as well. >> that's a huge hypocrisy, that is right what we propose a mask on a bus on some poor person trying to get to work that can barely afford a mask but a wild white house party everybody is spreading covid which we saw with nancy pelosi in that the correspon

joining us now, professor of law at the university of minnesota. y, staff writer at the new york times magazine and fellow at the yale law school. and professor, let me begin with you and your reaction to the work of the amateur historians in the opinion. >> well, one thing -- there's a lot of things that you are striking. the majority opinion is almost unchanged from the leaked draft. alito's basic argument, as you said, is the same, what's the liberty of the constitution protects, we have to look at what price you would half in 1868, would a court of a pallet have recognized the challenge to abortion in 1868, alito says no. so, you don't win. you don't have constitutional protection for abortion access now. i think there is at least two problems with this argument. first, actually, abortion that the chronological amongst americans's first generations it doesn't regulate, it doesn't criminalize criminalize abortions before quickening, which is before -- which can be as late as about 25 weeks. so, there actually isn't as consistent as history of abo

ah, i was gonna be a great basketball play a university of minnesota. i got hurt my coach didn't like me. all right. talk to henry kissinger i go why you such a soccer fan he goes. well, i used to play in germany right before world war ii the jewish kids used to play against the non-jewish kids, and i was really good. and in fact, i had a chance to to do something, but i had to get out of there because of what was happening in germany, but i but i have a passion for that game ever since that's a pretty good story. and i thought why did i play? didn't do anything division two soccer player in front of playing in front of 12 people. why did kissinger play? why did the rock play he wanted to go pro rock wanted to go pro all his friends university of miami dual one pro. he got cut in the cfl. he's living in his parents' basement married and said what a loser. i turned out to be but it set him up for life because life is not easy. we all have goals. we want to get that house. we want to get that girl that guy we want to get that car. you want to get that job

minnesota army national guard and it deployed in operation iraqi freedom earning aronze star. she received her bachelor's degree from the college of saint benedict and her md from the university of minnesota and completed her residency ucla. stephanieiller is the direcr of officers and enlist personnel management and an advisor for senior officer matters in the offices of the under secretary of defense for personnel and readiness. previously she serveas the director of recession policy from 2015 until 2022. prior to that she was a specl assistant to secretary of defense chuck hagel and ashton carter where she was responsible for a broad spectrum of programs including military a civilian personnel policies, military force readiness, defense health affairs, and, defense sexual assault prevention and response. ms. miller received her bachelor's degree from villanova university and holds a masters degree from george wasngton university. i would like to welcome all of our distinguished guests. and thank them for participating in today's hearg. i will begin by swearing in our witnesses. i ask each ofou turn on your audio and make sure i can see your face. rae your right hand while i

another bottom in an overnight shooting at the university of minnesota. o word on how quickly the restart will get formula back to shelves. meantime, the u.s. is supporting or -- importing bottles from mexico, but the fda says it will not be available for families to purchase until july. >>>9 and the usfl, the new jersey generals.com do nateing the pittsburgh mahlers many week eight. here's what darius victor had to say after the win. >> i call myself ceo. that's my job. [laughter] will: so here's the deal, box boy ceo, pete and i were debating what that meanings. he's referring to the end zone. pete: you guessed that. will: i've never heard the end zone called the box. starting at 3 p.m. odd the, birmingham taking on the new orleans breakers and tomorrow at noon, the michigan panthers, and at 4 the tampa bay bandits take on houston. and those are your headlines. carley: all right. coming up, the baltimore naacp is calling on the governor to deploy the national guard to help curb gun violation. you heard that right. lawrence jones is here to react. pete: p

even if people were 30% according to a university of minnesota study, 30% are wearing them on their chink. i'm not against mask use on planes or trains or buses. i wear them myself. but i wear a proper fitting mask and it is a matter of choice for me. people around me i encourage them to wear them. if they don't they don't. if they aren't wearing them properly they aren't stopping the spread of covid. the timing is atrocious. >> the day it came out the ceo of united air lanes said once the genie is out of the bottle we're not going back. are we going back to a mask on an airplane? >> no. the leaders fighting this are the same leaders that were maskless at the correspondents' dinner. no one is going to listen to this. it is legal theater. we aren't going back to mask mandates in the country. the science doesn't show they work. not only don't we work really or medically. >> bill: there was a study done with counselors in schools. this is -- i find this alarming. you say we already knew it already. three of the headlines. in school with mental health survey they found 94% of students show m

aaron hall university of minnesota so that last comment just is very striking to me and is like surely true. and given that at points to the existence of of essentially like two connected, but she able forms of politics one outside the court. or outside a legal community and one within it but within it is clearly politics, and so i'm not entirely convinced by that tripart version in which the the yearning for a separation of law and politics finds this middle ground of ideology and instead. i just wonder if in this in the example of originalism there isn't you know like an ethical issue that arises in continuing to produce honest original scholarship that is taking as true an assessment that like the workings of like inter jurist and legal community politics is so instrumental is so outcome driven and continuing to produce high quality like originalist on their own ground scholarship isn't you know continuing to perpetuate or seed like first order issues about legitimacy by essentially saying, yes, we can do this dance together. we are all in this legal community. we will through this

more research on the market concentration the university of minnesota's food protection productioninstituteis doing sot work to understand better how the lack of competition is ceimpacting producers and i wondered if you can talk about what they can be doing more on the research. a study that was required by the president's competition order. taking a look at the marketing how the concentration can potentially impact positively or negative capacity. for the 900 million there is a real demand in need and so i'm excited about the opportunity to use the resources available under the american rescue plan to create more capacity and competition which we think ultimately will lead to better prices. the legislation you are working on to be able to implement in the way that you envisioned. >> thank you so much. >> thank you. senator grassley. >> first i want to congratulate you on the announcement that you've made aboutou the rules beefing up the act. they filed a brief us whether or not to the supreme court o shoud take a case involving widely used pesticides and the big classification i is the so

choose to wear one but even when the mandates were in place, 30% of people according to the university of minnesotaing them below their chin line so they didn't do anything. how can you mandate something from a public health point of view nobody is wearing properly that they take off to eat that don't work, makes no sense whatsoever so we have to learn to live with the pandemic as it is and again, it's not leading to the number of hospitalization s and deaths and that's hugely good news. the thing they should be focusing on, stuart, is the booster, not on the masks. stuart: what would the booster, i don't know many people who have actually gone out and got a booster recently. >> well that's the point and i don't think the booster is the answer either except that when there's these variants spreading the more immunity you have the better. they made mistakes across-the-board on this. if you got over covid recently you're protected. if you have had the booster you're more protected than if you haven't had it. that's where the focus should be , on letting people make intelligent decisions based on prop

and matthew, matt's son is headed off to the university of minnesota.utout to the squawk graduates. >> it is cool to go to golden gopher land. bring some warm clothes. >> he's on the dance team. he has a scholarship >> oh, really? >> yeah. >> pretty great sports school. >>> up next -- >> kevin mchale. >> yes sara nelson will talk about the travel nightmare that existed at the airports >>> throughout the month of june, we are celebrating pride month. here is former professional soccer player thomas beattie >> i came out two years ago and it was something i wanted to do and dpidn't need to do i wanted to be visible i wanted the younger generation to look up and resonate with that example it was something i never had i looked around me and never saw somebody and it left me confused it was important for me to go through the process. it is bigger than just my every day life i was living. most liberating and fulfilling feeling i've ever had. >> announcer: executive edge is sponsored by at&t business at&t 5g is fast, reliable and secure mera? yep! every busine

know that his reporting is a partnership with the under told stories project of the university of st. thomas in minnesotae 50th anniversary of the break-in at the democratic national party orders here in washington, d.c. that event in 1972 would eventually trigger congressional hearings and bring down a u.s. president. the two reporters at the heart of uncovering it have reissued their book, all the presidents men, this week, with a new forward, drawing parallels between the actions with former president trump. on the eve of the first public hearings on january 6, bob woodward and carl bernstein join us now. we welcome both of you back to the newshour. >> thank you. judy: bob, i want to start with you. thank you both. over the years, there have been many narratives about watergate was about. it has been called a third-rate burghley does burglary, that the cover-up was worse in the crime. -- burglary, that the cover-up was worse than the crime. you have had time to reflect on it. what was it? >> an attempt to destroy the process for nominating democratic conduct. nixon came along and said gee, i would lik

that fred's reporting is a partnership with the under-told stories project at the university of st. thomas in minnesotaxt week marks the 50th anniversary of the break-in at democratic national party headquarters here in washington. that event in 1972 would eventually trigger congressional hearings and bring down a u.s. president. the 2 reporters at the heart of uncovering what came to be known as the watergate scandal have re-issued their book "all the president's men" this week, with a new foreword drawing parallels to the actions of former president trump. on the eve of the first public hearings on january 6th, bob woodward and carl bernstein join us now. we welcome both ofou back to the newshour. bob, i want to start with you. over the years, there have been many narratives about what watergate was about. it has been called a third-rate burglary, that the cover-up was worse than the crime. you have had plenty of time to reflect on it. what was it about? >> it was really an effort to destroy the process of nominating candidates for the democratic party. it was extraordinary. nixon said, i would like

note that this reporting is in partnership with the under told stories project at the university of st. thomas in minnesotaelations are reverberating across the political landscape after the third public hearing on the january 6 attack, a framework for new gun regulations is beginning to splinter as senators try to turn their agreement into a detailed plan. that brings us to an analysis from the associate editor for the washington post and a columnist. welcome to you both. nice to see you. let's start with the talks in the senate. a bipartisan group of senators have been close. they say they have a framework when it comes to gun violence prevention. this is led by this murphy of connecticut and john cornyn of texas. just yesterday john went and walked out of those talks saying it is fish are cut bait. i don't know what they have in mind. i am through talking. could the talks fall apart once again? >> yes, they can. come week seven i sat here on friday saying they're happy to talking. but i will believe it when i see it. when we go from talks to press conferences to passage ofhe bill. the fact that senator

fred's reporting is a partnership with the under-told stories project at the university of st. thomas in minnesota. that is the newshour for tonight. i am judy woodruff. join us online and again here tomorrow evening. for all of us at the pbs newshour, thank you, please stay safe and we'll see you soon. [captioning performed by the national captioning institute, which is responsible for its caption content and accuracy.] >> major funding for the pbs newshour has been provided by -- >> 25 years, consumer cellular goal has been to provide wireless service that helps people communicate and connect. we offer a variety of plans and our u.s.-based customer service team can help you find one that fits you. to visit -- to learn more, visit consumercellular.com. >> the ford foundation, working with visionaries on the front lines of social change worldwide. and with the ongoing support of these individuals and institutions. this program was made possible by the corporation for public broadcasting and by contributions to your pbs station from viewers like you. thank you. >>> hello, everyone. welcome to "aman

university of california irvine. previously, professor goodwin was the everett fraser professor at the university of minnesota. with appointments in law school, metal school school, and the school of public health. the receiver behave in the university of wisconsin, her j.d. from boston college law school, and receive llm and ask you the degrees in the university of wisconsin. we welcome our distinguished witnesses, we thank them for participating today. i will begin by swearing in our witnesses. i asked that are witnesses in person please rise and raise your right hand. i asked that are remote witness please turn on your audio and make sure i can see your face, and raise your right hand while i administer the oath. do you swear or affirm under penalty of perjury that the testimony you are about to give is true and correct to the best of your knowledge, information, and believe, so help you god? >> i do. >> let the record show, the witnesses have answered in the affirmative. thank you, please be seated. please note, that each of your written statements will be entered into the record in its entirety. accordingl

aaron hall university of minnesota so that last comment just is very striking to me and is like surely true. and given that at points to the existence of of essentially like two connected, but she able forms of politics one outside the court. or outside a legal community and one within it but within it is clearly politics, and so i'm not entirely convinced by that tripart version in which the the yearning for a separation of law and politics finds this middle ground of ideology and instead. i just wonder if in this in the example of originalism there isn't you know like an ethical issue that arises in continuing to produce honest original scholarship that is taking as true an assessment that like the workings of like inter jurist and legal community politics is so instrumental is so outcome driven and continuing to produce high quality like originalist on their own ground scholarship isn't you know continuing to perpetuate or seed like first order issues about legitimacy by essentially saying, yes, we can do this dance together. we are all in this legal community. we will through this

that fred's reporting is a partnership with the under-told stories project at the university of st. thomas in minnesotations are reverberating across the political landscape after the third public hearing on the january 6th capitol attack. meanwhile, a framework for new gun regulations is beginning to splinter as senators try to turn their broad agreement into a detailed law. that brings us to the analysis of capehart and gerson. that's jonathan capehart, associate editor for the washington post, and his colleague at the post, opinion columnist michael gerson. david brooks is away. welcome to you both. let's start with the talks in the senate, the bipartisan group of senator we know have been close, they say they have the framework for gun violence prevention, led by chris murphy of connecticut and john cornyn of texas. just yesterday, john cornyn walked out of those talks, saying this as he lked out -- it is fish or cut a. i don't know what they, meaning democrats, have in mind, but i am through talking. could the talks fall apart again? jonathan: yes they can. how ma weeks have i said here on friday

according to a report from the university of nebraska, the usda cattle region with the highest cattle grade rating is the iowa minnesota region. in fact, over 94% of the cattle in my region grade over 80% choice. this compares to less than 13% from texas, oklahoma, and then new mexico region. midwest cap producers are hurting. they see everyone in the supply chain making large profits while they are losing anywhere from 100 and hundred $50 ahead. fairness and transparency creates a -- which is critical to our producers. and the processing of cattle is mostly operated by four packers that control nearly 85% of the market. this market share controls the price of contracts, manage the amount of animals being slaughtered through the line speeds, and the control of supply livestock to their satisfaction. the system is set up where the packers will never see a loss, creating massive guaranteed profits, while rural farmers lose their livelihoods. we noted this earlier, one of the witnesses, don don schiefelbein saying that several months ago, arizona, for the large meatpackers, agreed to provide information to a cattleman's o

university from lutherville, maryland... and our returning champion, a meteorologist from minneapolis, minnesota... whose 6-day cash winnings total... and now, here is the host ofers and applause] thank you, johnny, and welcome, everyone. eric ahasic has done it again-- secured a win without being able to be caught in final jeopardy! it's his fifth straight runaway game. now, to put that into perspective, only one other season 38 champion has achieved runaway status in five of their first six games and she's one of the best players this game has ever seen, amy schneider. eric, you're obviously in pretty good company with that statistic, but barry and megan are here to put your winning ways to the test. good luck to all three of you. let's take a look at the categories in play for the jeopardy! round. and... and... eric, you'll select first as our returning champion. early 1800s, $600. megan. what is humane society? no. barry. what is a society for the protection of animals?