rvencio, france professor of the faculty of law of the university of paris panthéon sarbonne member ofurt of conciliation and arbitration within the osce since 2020 national human dimension expert within the moscow mechanism represented the interests of the government france in three cases pending at the international criminal court , the city of the hague, the netherlands 70 sheets, a significant part of which is devoted to all the prisoners, the report is very indicative and, using its example, we will consider the double standards of those who teach democracy. behind

rvsensio, france professor of the faculty of law of the university of paris panthéon sarbonne member t of conciliation and arbitration within the osce since 2020 national human dimension expert within the moscow mechanism represented the interests of the french government in three cases pending before the international criminal court, the city of the hague the netherlands since experts also have an interesting practice on the list, presented on the official website of the osce, representatives of only the necessary states pursuing the same policy austria belgium canada czech republic lithuania usa france no , for example hungary whose political course somewhat contradicts the official policy , in other words, a very biased list , i propose to consider this report as an illustrative example of hypocrisy and double standards, here is an analysis of legislative acts and facts as the author states, possibly presumably and probably crimes against human rights in belarus facts perhaps and even presumably this quote is from the report of an expert on international law. the methodology follow

rvencio, france professor of the faculty of law of the university of paris panthéon sarbonne member ofthe conciliation and arbitration of the opse since 2020 national human dimension expert of the moscow mechanism represented the interests of the french government in three cases pending before the international criminal court, the city of gaga , the netherlands 70 pages, a significant part of which is devoted to all political prisoners . the report is very indicative and, using its example , we will consider the double standards of those who teach democracy. over the past two years , a large number of actions have been carried out that pose a serious threat to the human dimension of the osce. as of april 18 , 2023, there are at least 1,486 political prisoners numerous prisoners are tortured there are various testimonies describing acts of physical or sexual violence recommendations to immediately release political prisoners on humanitarian grounds. the very term "political prisoner" does not exist in any legal practice in the world. so, in belarus, according to the data of 1,500 politi

rvsensio, france professor of the faculty of law of the university of paris panthéon sarbonne member conciliation and arbitration within the osce since 2020 national human dimension expert within the moscow mechanism represented the interests of the french government in three cases pending before the international criminal court city of gaga the netherlands with experts also an interesting practice in the list presented on the official website of the osce, representatives of only the necessary states pursuing one policy austria belgium canada czech republic lithuania usa france is not, for example hungary whose political course is somewhat contrary to official policy, in other words, a very biased list comes out , i propose to consider this report as an illustrative example of hypocrisy and double standards, here is an analysis of legislative acts and facts, as the author states, possibly presumably and probably crimes against human rights in belarus factors, perhaps and even presumably this quote from the report of an expert on international law. the methodology followed by the spea

rvencio, france professor at the faculty of law university paris pantheon sarbonne member of the court of conciliation and arbitration within the osce since 2020 national human dimension expert within the moscow mechanism represented the interests of the french government in three pending cases consideration of the international criminal court, the city of the hague, the netherlands 70 sheets, a significant part of which is devoted to all the prisons of the prisoners, the report is very indicative and, using its example, we will consider the double standards of those who teach democracy. over the past 2 years , a large number of actions have been carried out that pose a serious threat to the human dimension of the osce. as of april 18 , 2023 , there are at least 1486 prisoners in belarus testimonies describing acts of physical or sexual violence recommendations for the immediate release of political prisoners on humanitarian grounds. perhaps, let's start with the very term political, its prisoner does not exist in any legal practice in the world. so, in belarus, according to the data o

rvsenciu, france professor of the faculty of law university paris panthéon sarbonne member for conciliationnal human dimension expert within the moscow mechanism represented the interests of the french government in three cases pending before the international criminal court, the hague city of the netherlands by experts also an interesting practice in the list is presented on the official website of the osce, representatives are only needed. states pursuing one policy austria belgium canada czech republic lithuania usa france is not, for example hungary whose political course is somewhat contrary to the official policy of the coalition, in other words, a very, biased list comes out , i propose to consider this report as an illustrative example of hypocrisy and double standards, here is an analysis of legislative acts and facts, as the author states, perhaps presumably and probably a crime against human rights in belarus of facts, it is possible and even presumably this quote from the report of an expert on international law. the methodology followed by the speaker was largely determined by