special that is completely unfair and unjustice. that is what i'm trying to ov this particular lawsuit. now, if you take a careful look at the life history you will notice the senate, when they law was before them, had they opportunities to actually allow employer contributions. first nator harry reid filed the law there was all kinds of committee activity and that allowance for a in ribution was included that committee work but he chose not to include it in his law. senator grassley twice offered allowents to specifically a employer contribution. last time on march 24, 2010, put up to a t was vote and was defeated by a vote 43-56. so, it was not like this was something that congress didn't this was that something they didn't understand. this was specifically debated rejected. so, what we are talking about law of that this is the the 4r57land. if this administration don't law of the land, they should come to congress to land.e the law of the they should not change it by presidential decree or fiat.ential that is really what brings m

special that is completely unfair and unjustice.t is what i'm trying to ov this particular lawsuit. now, if you take a careful look at the life history you will notice the senate, when they law was before them, had they opportunities to actually allow employer contributions. first nator harry reid filed the law there was all kinds of committee activity and that allowance for a in ribution was included that committee work but he chose not to include it in his law.

special that is completely unfair and unjustice.that is what i'm trying to ov this particular lawsuit. now, if you take a careful look at the life history you will notice the senate, when they law was before them, had they opportunities to actually allow employer contributions. first nator harry reid filed the law there was all kinds of committee activity and that allowance for a in ribution was included that committee work but he chose not to include it in his law. senator grassley twice offered allowents to specifically a employer contribution. last time on march 24, 2010, put up to a t was vote and was defeated by a vote 43-56. so, it was not like this was something that congress didn't this was that something they didn't understand. this was specifically debated rejected. so, what we are talking about law of that this is the the 4r57land. if this administration don't law of the land, they should come to congress to land.e the law of the they should not change it by presidential decree or fiat.ential that is really what brings me

no country has a mow moply unjustice and wrongful convictions happener where. is not a question of nationality or -- or location as much as it is one of a really horrific miss karnl of justice. and she and her family and supporters are hoping this gets reversed. and we're a long way off. >> i want to get into what's next. how do you have any confidence that you can successfully fight to clear her name when you have seen how this legal process has continued? >> well, you know, i -- i use the term hope because i believe she feels and the family feels at someplace there will be a recognition of the truth. and a recognition that there is absolutely no evidence today, there was no evidence before, and there never will be any evidence of her guilt. >> how far out do you think that is? these next steps are months in the coming. >> oh, more than that. we're probably, you know, i would guess probably a year away before the next, you know, proceeding. so you know, again, you know, there's fortitude, there's resilien resilience there's a recognition that she's not guilty.