maybe we can do it unlaterally. and any of the companies that did the tax inversion would not be available for federal contracts. real questions, the treasury secretary said they didn't have the authority to do that and i guess the pen got mightier in the last few weeks. >> plenty of fodder for fox news sunday. >> yeah, we'll deal with the tax inversion story. we'll have john engleer. and current head of the business roundtable said it is not pretty and you may not like. it but it is legitimate. and the democratic senator chris coones said it is a matter of economic patriotism. it is wrong but legal. we'll look forward to that. check your listings in your area for the time it runs. >> olympics star oscar pistorias's fate may be in the hands of the judge. we'll have that next. p÷úñ >> closing arguments underway in the oscar pistorias murder trial. the athlete leaving court with his father after the prosecution pulled no punches saying that pistorias was an appalling witness and he lied repeatedly. and blasting p

do it unlaterally and no deal. and hamas doesn't gain and we take advantage of the new alignment where egypt and saudi arabia and jordan and palestinian authority. and israel all has the same interest that hamas and the brotherhood should not gain. >> john? >> well, this is not how most people spend the 21st birthday. we'll tell you why the guy was thrown in jail accused of a major student high over the american city. and the doctor with the ebola virus treated in a hospital in atlanta. are we at risk of ebola outbreak here on u.s. soil? >>> a fox news alert. sad news that the former press secretary to president ronald reagan, james brady, has died. you might recall that brady was shot and seriously injured in the assassination attempt on president ronald reagan back in march of 1981. he fought for years afterward are on behalf of efforts to control guns. president reagan's press secretary, james brady, who had been in failing health for some time, has died now at the age of 73. >>> less than 24 hours from now, ano

i am not going to preinclude the judge's process and we are not offering to do anything unlaterally and we are simply recognizing the fact that the da is not in our jail systems and adult probation is not in our jail systems, to create a process that the district attorney and everyone else in the system to then go before the judge. but to be so presumptuous, for anyone to dictate that there should be a one universal risk assessment tool when we use the risk assessment tool i would not say that it is better or worse than adult probation and it is not better or worse than the public defender and the one that is not invented yet by the district attorney and then i would not say that that would be the one that super seeds another one. because, we all should stand before the judge. and that is exactly, what this process invents in this legislation. >> could i just clarify. supervisor yee, actually and then we will go from supervisor mar. >> and i appreciate your response in regards to the risk assessment to what you may have. and part of this, and i also appreciate your track record at the s

candidate for reconsideration for the electronic monitoring, we are not going to make that judgment, unlaterally and we never would do that and the whole point of this legislation, is designed a communication vehicle, that allows us to report to the da, so that have together, we go in front of the courts, and the courts and the judge, should be the determinant and not us. >> supervisor yee? >> they chose to discontinue it and what is the difference here in what you are suggesting here in san francisco verses la's program? and why would we be successful verses not being successful? that is such a softball question and i get to boast about how great our department is and how well things are working in san francisco at the expense of los angeles but i will not go there and we are two book ends in the state, and by fact, los angeles is the largest county jail system in the country, and then we are, in the north side of the state, one of the most under crowded jail systems in the country, we really are apples and oranges and i think that because of the good work we are focusing on reducing recidivism

and as it relates to the president's commitment to acting unlaterally to address the broken immigration system. there is congress' failure and house republican failure to take action on a common sense proposal and address a proposal that we all know exist is evidence of how poorly congress has performed in trying to address this problem and because congress failed to act, the president is going to use the power that is vested in the executive branch to try to take steps that will address this problem. again those steps will not be as robust or impactful or long lasting as enactful of legislation but there may be things the president can do in the confines of the law to address the problem and if there are, the president will not hesitate to act on them. the final thing i will say on these, immigration in the last couple of years in the terms of the political debate was talked about quoit a bit and the need to reform the system was a view that was held intensely by certain segments of the population. but i think many mefrns consider this to be. >> josh earnest is moved on to discuss matt

they are looking at more options and acting unlaterally here. we are seeing many reports that say walgreens not planning to move the head quarters to the uk. that is one and maybe they are afraid of retaliation here and the other r concern, maybe many companies will get ahead and they will see more inversions if the new rules are not retroactive. >> 11 big banks failing to deliver adequate plans to federal regulators that they can avoid an economic crisis. >> a little bit. bank of america and golden saks and city group. they failed to prove if we have another economic crisis, they have a plan in place. a so- called living will. to wind themselves down without needing taxpayer money. they are handing in pages of documents to federal authorities and they are not passing, for reasons they don't know. it is very ambiggious. the process is, because they didn't have sufficient plans and back and forth with the administration, for the next step, we don't know what it is. they believe it is a move to make the big banks smaller. i want to point out that

failure to act on immigration reform is likely to move forward at the end of the summer on some unlateralion on immigration reform. that's infuriating republicans who say that last november the president publicly said he didn't believe he had the executive pour to move forward on immigration, that only congress had that power. i pressed josh earns today on what changed. he said it was because since last november republicans have not acted on immigration reform, although i pressed him on the fact that the congress, when the house democrats ran it in 2009 and 2010, didn't act on immigration reform either, and that did not lead to executive orders. listen. >> you recall back in 2009 there were many things on the president's plate. >> as now, israel, gaza, the economy. he has a lot going on now. >> he does but the crisis we face in fine related our financial situation and our economy bleeding jobs, that was at the focus of congressional activity and hack tight here at the white house. >> so the white house press secretary saying they could not get immigration reform when the democrats ran bot