SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
34
34
Feb 7, 2019
02/19
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 34
favorite 0
quote 0
resolutions authorizing unlitigated claims against the city and county of san francisco. >> are there any members of the public who wish to testify on the items to be heard in closed session? seeing none, public testimony is now closed. do we have a motion to convene in closed session? >> second. we are now in closed session. >> we love our parks, but we love... >> and the community who is really the core of it all, came together and said what we need is a place for our teenager to play, not just play grounds for the kids and soccer fields but we need a skate park that will keep the kids home in the neighborhood so they can play where they live. >> the children in the neighborhood and it will be a major boone. and we have generations, the youth generations that will be able to use this park in different places. >> the best park in san francisco right here. >> creating place where people can be active and lead, active, healthy life styles that are going to just stay with them for life. ♪ >> meeting will come to order. i'm supervisor hillary ronen, seat of the committee. short by we wil
resolutions authorizing unlitigated claims against the city and county of san francisco. >> are there any members of the public who wish to testify on the items to be heard in closed session? seeing none, public testimony is now closed. do we have a motion to convene in closed session? >> second. we are now in closed session. >> we love our parks, but we love... >> and the community who is really the core of it all, came together and said what we need is a place for our...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
18
18
Feb 11, 2019
02/19
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 18
favorite 0
quote 0
>> clerk: item 28 is an unlitigated claim antera investment and trading l.l.c. versus city and county of san francisco. [agenda item read] [agenda item read] [agenda item read] [agenda item read] [agenda item read] [agenda item read] [agenda item read]. >> is there any public comment on the items to be addressed in closed session? seeing none, may i have a motion whether to disclose? >> motion to assert. >> assert. >> second. >> all those in favor? [voting] >> opposed? the motion carrie >> the commission has reconvened into open session. the renouncement following closed session is item 28, settle items 29 through 36, no action. may i have a motion whether to disclose. >> move not to disclose. >> second. >> all those in favor? [voting] >> opposed? the motion carries. other new business? seeing none, meeting is adjourned at 5:15 >> when i open up the paper every day, i'm just amazed at how many different environmental issues keep popping up. when i think about what planet i want to leave for my children and other generations, i think about what kind of contributi
>> clerk: item 28 is an unlitigated claim antera investment and trading l.l.c. versus city and county of san francisco. [agenda item read] [agenda item read] [agenda item read] [agenda item read] [agenda item read] [agenda item read] [agenda item read]. >> is there any public comment on the items to be addressed in closed session? seeing none, may i have a motion whether to disclose? >> motion to assert. >> assert. >> second. >> all those in favor? [voting]...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
79
79
Feb 24, 2019
02/19
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 79
favorite 0
quote 0
item 15 is unlitigated claims kin du truong 16 peter day ton versus city and county of san francisco, 17 han over insurance company asowyx holdings incorporated. and 18 is existing litigation david alfaro versus city and county of san francisco. item 19 existing litigation pacific gas and electric corporation and item 20 existing litigation city and council tee of san francisco versus pacific gas and electric company. item 21, existing litigation pacific gas and electric. 22 existing litigation pacific gas and electric. 23 existing litigation pacific gas and electric. 24 existing litigation pacific gas and electric. 25 existing litigation pacific gas and electric. 26 existing litigation city and county of san francisco versus pacific gas and electric. >> is there any public comment on the items to be discussed in closed session? hearing none, may i have a motion to assert. >> move to assert. >> second. >> all those in favor. >> aye. >> aye. >> opposed. the m >> we have now come out of closed session. i would like to report on the items. 15, 16, 17 and 18 were settled and items 19-26 t
item 15 is unlitigated claims kin du truong 16 peter day ton versus city and county of san francisco, 17 han over insurance company asowyx holdings incorporated. and 18 is existing litigation david alfaro versus city and county of san francisco. item 19 existing litigation pacific gas and electric corporation and item 20 existing litigation city and council tee of san francisco versus pacific gas and electric company. item 21, existing litigation pacific gas and electric. 22 existing litigation...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
89
89
Feb 8, 2019
02/19
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 89
favorite 0
quote 0
resolutions authorizing unlitigated claims against the city and county of san francisco. >> are there any members of the public who wish to testify on the items to be heard in closed session? seeing none, public testimony is now closed. do we have a motion to convene in closed session? >> second. we >> the teams really, really went above and beyond and is continuing to do that today. this past year, the san francisco public utilities commission water quality division started receiving many more requests to test for lead in the public school system here in san francisco as a result of legislation that had passed from the state requiring all of the public schools to do lead testing. and so as a result, the public utilities commission and the water quality team in particular was asked to meet with the san francisco unified school district to begin to prioritize which schools to test to meet that state mandate. >> the team that tests, we're a full service environmental laboratory, and we take care of both the needs of the water quality division and the waste water enter price. and on the
resolutions authorizing unlitigated claims against the city and county of san francisco. >> are there any members of the public who wish to testify on the items to be heard in closed session? seeing none, public testimony is now closed. do we have a motion to convene in closed session? >> second. we >> the teams really, really went above and beyond and is continuing to do that today. this past year, the san francisco public utilities commission water quality division started...