the issues, the word illegal was used in connection with unmasking. there is no unlegal unmaskings. they may violate policy or be improper. it's not against the law to do it, but we have both been in the room. all three of us have been in the room when principals with almost precisely the same job description had unmasking numbers. it doesn't mean a crime was committed. it doesn't even mean the motive was -- there are different policies and pair dimes being request to unmask. what was troubling to me and to the two friend tons other side of the aisle the principal himself or herself was not even aware the unmasking request had been made. that's not what we want. if we will trust a national security adviser and trust an attorney general at least make sure it is the principal doing it. we were all there and all i think surprised at the testimony. so my question to my friends would be this. why wait until similar problems manifest themselves? unless he is going to mirror will never go back through another transition unless we have another nonsuccessive presidency. he is fnot going to g

with literally, i want this name unmasked because i want it unmasked, versus other people that would give a full-page explanation as to why and our attempt to make it more uniform and use more strict scrutiny as to how people would get a united states citizen's name unmasked, that we could possibly be having an argument on this committee in this room that trying to do a better job and make those screws tighter is somehow political. that somehow that's playing politics. that we're trying to make a political statement by doing a little bit better job to make sure there's uniformity within the administration on how united states citizens' names are unmasked. how that's political, i have no idea. but that just goes to show how this committee has devolved with something as simple as trying to get unmasking right, how you could potentially vote no on a bill that keeps this country safe because you think that we're playing politics with regard to unmasking in the last administration or transition period. even if that's true, the next administration might be a democrat and guess what, it's s

the issues, the word illegal was used in connection with unmasking. there is no illegal unmasking. they may violate policy. they may be improper. it's not against the law to do it, but we both have been in the room, all three of us have been in the room when principles with almost precisely the same job description had wildly disparate unmasking numbers. it doesn't meet the crime was committed. it doesn't even mean the motive was nefarious. what it does mean is that are different policies and paradigms being applied to the requested unmasked. and what was most troubling to me, and i note was to my two friends on the other side of the aisle, is that some instances the principal himself or herself was not even aware of the unmasking request had been made. that's not what we want. if we are going to cost a national security adviser -- trust -- we will trust and attorney general with the power to unmask a fellow citizens name, lease make sure it's the principle doing it. and we were all there and we were all i think surprised at the testimony. so my question to my friends would be this

a lot of times the unmasking concerns are linked to and less about the unmasking itself and more about a n in my mind a ver serious issue leaks of the information whether it's through unmasking or something else. that's something that we're trying to be very aggressive on. my -- i think the department, the intelligence community, the fbi are open to working with you and the committee on the unmasking issue. i think ideally it would be separated from 702 which we think is an incredibly important tool. >> i see my time has eck pixpir. thank you, mr. chairman. >> the chair recognizes the gentleman from georgia mr. collins for five minutes. >> thank you, mr. chairman. thanks for being here. thanks for staying. sometimes we get here a little bit later and we go earlier as many have left, but sometimes you get to stay to the end. there's something you had said earlier, the chairman brought it up and the one from northeast georgia, it's good to be back. you traveled to gainesville in judge kelly's court and everybody else for a while. i think the interesting thing here is something that was s

a lot of times the unmasking concerns are linked to and less about the unmasking itself and more about a, it in my mind, a very serious issue, leaks of the information whether it's through unmasking or something else. that's something that we're trying to be very aggressive on. my -- i think the department, the intelligence community, the fbi are open to working with you and the committee on the unmasking issue. i think ideally it would be separated from 702 which we think is an incredibly important tool. >> i see my time has expired. thank you, mr. chairman. >> the chair recognizes the gentleman from georgia mr. collins for five minutes. >> thank you, mr. chairman. thanks for being here. thanks for staying. sometimes we get here a little bit later and we go earlier as many have left, but sometimes you get to stay to the end. there's something you had said earlier, the chairman brought it up and the one from northeast georgia, it's good to be back. you traveled to gainesville in judge kelly's court and everybody else for a while. i think the interesting thing here is something that was

we've heard reports through the media there has been unmasking of information. what i mean by that is classified information is seized on somebody and someone else, an american, their name is caught up in the communication and if someone leaks who that was, unmasks that individual, my understanding is it's classified information whoever does that unmasking has committed a felony. is that correct? >> the only distinction i would make is the unmasking is something done in the course of the intelligence analysis. leaking would be a violation. >> that's what i'm talking about, the leaking of that information. and as of today, has anybody been indicted under leaking information on unmasking up until today? has the justice department indicted anybody under those two scenarios and events? >> we have indicted, prosecuted people for leaking. i'm not certain whether -- i don't believe any of them related to unmasking. >> so no one has been indicted, to your knowledge. i want to bring up the foreign intelligence surveillance act that has been discussed by this committee nu

>> the only distinction i would make, congressman, is the unmasking. typically something done in the course of the intelligence analysis. the leaking would be a violation. >> that's what i'm talking about, the leaking of that information. and as of today, has anybody been indicted under prism? has anybody been indicted under leaking information on unmasking up until today? has the justice department indicted anybody under those two scenarios and events? >> we have indicted -- prosecuted people for leaking. i'm not certain -- i don't believe any of them related to unmasking. >> so nobody has been indicted, to your knowledge. which i want to bring up now the foreign intelligence surveillance act that has been discussed by this committee numerous times. it's the law that allows secret courts to issue secret warrants to try to go get terrorists that are operating overseas and get their information. does the justice department present those fisa warrants to a fisa judge? >> in situations where a warrant is required, yes, it needs to be obtained from a feder

that was the unmasking of general flynn. one of the conversations that occurred with general kislyak had a portion of it appear in the "washington post". this occurred before donald trump was in the white house while barack obama was still president. >> bill: explain the potential legal significance of that point, judge. >> the legal significance of that puts focus on the obama administration because it demonstrates another potential crime by somebody on the obama team, which was the use of national security privileged classified information for domestic political purposes. stated differently, somebody in the white house asked either the nsa or the f.b.i. for transcripts of conversations that ambassador kislyak was having with americans. after they read those transcripts they asked who are these americans? we think we can figure it out. either the nsa or f.b.i., we don't know who had it at this point, told somebody in the obama white house this is mike flynn, this person a, person b is the ambassador, a portion of that was l

committees themselves often ask for unmasking so they can digest the information. a lot of times concerns, legitimate concerns, about unmasking are really almost more about, to me, a problem that i take very seriously which is leaks of information. and that's something that we have now a dedicated unit since i've taken over that's focused specifically on that. we've also recently reissued -- not reissued -- issued a new media policy that clamps down and tightens up the rules about interaction with the media inside the fbi and something we take very, very seriously. >> in conclusion we know as much about the conversation on the phoenix tarmac between president clinton and loretta lynch as about the interview with hillary clinton in the fbi. >> the chair recognizes the gentleman from tennessee mr. cohen for five minutes. >> thank you. director wray, we in memphis have been blessed with good fbi agents and the fbi has a outstanding reputation, and historically had a great reputation. in memphis, i had a situation where there was a county employee named mickey wright w

committees themselves often ask for unmasking so they can digest the information. a lot of times legitimate concerns about unmasking are really almost more about to me a problem that i take very seriously, which is leaks of information. that's something that we have now dedicated unit since i've taken over that is focused specifically on that and also recently issued a new media policy that clamps down and tightens up the rules about interaction with the media inside the f.b.i. and that's something i think we take very, very seriously. >> in conclusion we know as much about the conversation on the phoenix tarmac between president clinton and loretta lynch as we do about the interview of hillary clinton within the f.b.i. >> the chair recognizes mr. cohen for five minutes. >> we've been blessed with great f.b.i. agents in tennessee. in memphis i had a situation where there was a county employee named mickey wright who was murdered. the f.b.i. worked on the case and justice was found and he got a light sentence, the f.b.i. that did that. they recently arrested a man n

later admitted that she unmasked.eople started to tell stories like we were concerned about the way other nations were going to feel so we needed to hear what they were saying about the election of president trump. they came up with all kinds ofof stories. what we see now, based on this evidence, based on the fact that we know now peter strzok interviewed flynn, that he was involved in the hillary clinton email server investigation, one of the central, key players. >> sean: they exonerated him. nobody gets exonerated before an investigation is complete. now he's trashing trump and he's going after flynn. let me go from the legal side.ru let me ask gregg jarrett. how many other members of robert mueller special counsel harbor blatantel pro-clinton, anti-trup bias and you have another column you are writing. >> and corrupt purposes, yes. mueller stacked his entire staff, almost his entire staff with democratic donors, as you point out. they were not reviewed or vetted. >> sean: any republican donors? >> not that we are

we had a whole 1972 bill where there was a section about unmasking and how you have to report unmasking events during presidential elections. that was a negative thing. i like and respect he haevan, b sadly in the last couple months he's devoted himself to things like wiretapping and he needs to exclude himself from these distractions. >> some would call it impartial. others would say he's not impartial, he's just trying to invoke the other aspects of this. >> i try to be pretty careful in the language i use. i'm not saying there was collusion. i am an investigator, i want to make sure there is impartiality. i looked at all the intercepts that were unmasked and how they were done. do i think that process can be bettertt and more sharply defin? was it used improperly by sam power or susan rice? there is absolutely zero evidence that that was the case. >> jim hines of the house intel community. appreciate it. >>> when we come back, some signs that republicans may want to start looking over their shoulders next november. this is tim barckholtz. that's me! this is something he is researchin

ref heard reports there's been unmasking of information. what i mean by that is -- classified information is seized on somebody, and someone an american, their name is caught up in the communication, and if someone leaks who that was, unmasks that individual, my understanding is if it's classified information, is that correct? >> the only distinction i would make, congressman, is the unmasking. typically something done in the course of the intelligence analysis, leaking would be a violation. >> that's what i'm talking about, the leaking of that information. and as of today, has anybody been indicted under prism? has anybody been indicted on leaking information on unmasking up until today? has the justice department indicted anybody under those two scenarios and events? >> we have indicted -- prosecuted people for leaking. i'm not schenn -- i don't believe any of them related to unmasking. >> so no one has been indicted, to your knowledge. which i want to bring up now the foreign intelligence surveillance act that has been discussed by this

mitch mcconnell would not commit to unmasking the names there as far as i could tell. >> think abouttion where members of congress can commit misconduct, the taxpayers will pay for it and then it's kept secret. what kind of behavior are you trying to promote? here's the thing about the offenders. this is taxpayer dollars. you as a tax payer have a right to know how your money is being spend. my bill would unveil the perpetrators and the claims. the american public deserves that information. there's no way that should be secret. >> laura: are there any other funds we should know about on capitol hill that you've come across that -- >> my staff, we're researching to get all of them. what happens is, they'll do one permanent appropriations. just a pot of money that existed outside the budget process so people said did you know this is there? no because it's not in the budget -- >> laura: how is it allowed? >> it shouldn't be. mueller's funding is outside. i think that's a bad interpretation. i don't think he's entitled to that. that's what they're relying on. >> laura: so he can spend a

lets talk for a second of this unmasking thing.that is were unmasked and how they were done. do i think that process is better and sharper. i will participate willingly in an effort to reform that. was it used properly by sam powell and susan rice? there is zero evidence that was the case. >> jim heyes, thank you for ö >> jim heyes, thank you for ö >> when we come ronoh really?g's going on at schwab. thank you clients? well jd power did just rank them highest in investor satisfaction with full service brokerage firms... again. and online equity trades are only $4.95... i mean you can't have low cost and be full service. it's impossible. it's like having your cake and eating it too. ask your broker if they offer award-winning full service and low costs. how am i going to explain this? if you don't like their answer, ask again at schwab. schwab, a modern approach to wealth management. with a quick check of your weather. so, giant blue line. pointy, pointy triangles moving south. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 sunshines. not on this planet. um, sha

lets talk for a second of this unmasking thing.he intercept that is were unmasked and how they were done. do i think that process is better and sharper. i will participate willingly in an effort to reform that. was it used properly by sam powell and susan rice? there is zero evidence that was the case. >> jim heyes, thank you for ö >> when we come back, republicans should start looking hi, sam champion with a quick check of your weather. so, giant blue line. pointy, pointy triangles moving south. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 sunshines. not on this planet. um, shadows. big shadows. high. hello. working down to the south. low. another shadow. lovely, lovely. stripes. lots of stripes rhode island. ♪ are we live? ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ what we do every night is like something out of a strange dream. except that the next morning... it all makes sense. fedex powers global commerce with vast, far-reaching networks... deep knowledge of industries... and, yes... maybe a little magic. ♪ >>> welcome back, it is been a year since president trump won presidency. and whil

you would have to have a reason to unmask it.n this. >> you already know what he said. >> did you have any conversations? yeah, we already have the at this particular time of the conversation was it the russian dossier that helped unmask certain individuals leading up to this? we don't know this yet. it's definitely thought a happy day for the trump administration. i'm not trying to underplay it but not trying to jump to these huge i object inflammatory conclusions either because i don't think that's smart. thank you both. always great to have you on. and straight ahead, will congress drop a tax cut in our christmas stocking or will they be grinches? we will take you live to capitol hill where it's all happening happening ♪ happening ♪ it can detect a threat using ai, and respond 60 times faster. it lets you know where your data lives, down to the very server. it keeps your insights from prying eyes, so they're used by no one else but you. it. is. the cloud. the ibm cloud. the cloud that's designed for your data. ai ready. secure

you would have to have a reason to unmask it.with you on this. >> you already know what he said. >> did you have any conversations? yeah, we already have the at this particular time of the conversation was it the russian dossier that helped unmask certain individuals leading up to this? we don't know this yet. it's definitely thought a happy day for the trump administration. i'm not trying to underplay it but not trying to jump to these huge i object inflammatory conclusions either because i don't think that's smart. thank you both. always great to have you on. and straight ahead, will congress drop a tax cut in our christmas stocking or will they be grinches? we will take you live to capitol hill where it's all happening ♪ liberty mutual stood with me when this guy got a flat tire in the middle of the night. hold on dad... liberty did what? yeah, liberty mutual 24-hour roadside assistance helped him to fix his flat so he could get home safely. my dad says our insurance doesn't have that. don't worry - i know what a lug wrench is

the surveillance, unmasking of trump and associates by the obama administration. we have the clinton bought and paid for, fake news, russian propaganda salacious dossier. they wanted that to be used to influence the election. and this week, fox news obtained the anti-trump text messages between peter strzok and his girlfriend, lisa page, discussing the insurance policy against donald trump winning the election. what was the insurance policy? then you have the special counsel, robert mueller's team. they had been exposed and corrupted, abusively by us. incapable of conducting a fair investigation. the list goes on and on. and "the hill"'s article raises more questions for joining us now, the journalist who worked hard, broke the story, wide-open from "the hill," john solomon. let's go through the step by step.e you see the timeline from october 14th to make november 6. in the pressure that being brought to bear on this woman to go forward becomes astronomical the payment gets astronomically high. walk us through it. >>hr i never thought i would lie today as a repor

black market in doping with an estimated thirty billion euros a year so in whose interest is it to unmask the cheats and clean up sport demands that it was picked that diminish it given that he was picked at the measure of the virtually sixty that he believes about the guess about so the less it guy is on the best christmas but even voters that. sponsors and sports federations a party responsible. for the video. where is it where is my eyes up without. some leaders benefit financially from having doped athletes and cover up the cheating to ensure participation in international meetings. because it does damage stuff that's a bowl of push for you on top of a call for twelve years and in a world that values prefer. moments in competition so highly all the proponents of clean sports fighting a losing battle. it's rare to find out leads willing to talk about doping. where starting instigation that things parts could i talk to no i'm sorry i have no comment to make nothing to say about that. and only to say well yes you know the shop money for doping and it was up and. you know and she hunted h

now, there is also widespread unmasking of american citizens, including trump associates. and at one point during the end of the obama administration, former u.n. ambassador, remember samantha power? why would she be unmasking people caught up incidentally in surveillance at the rate of one american a day? and that we have ben rhodes former obama deputy national security advisor, remember, talking about the attorney wray? remember him? he was a person of interest in the unmavericking scandal. so it appears what the obama administration was, in fact, deliberate by unleashing this deep state power to strike against the incoming president before he even took office? and take a look at how former ambassador john bolton tonight is describing this mess that is going on in this country tonight. >> the "wall street journal" said this is the first attempt at cudahy that in american history. it's a mini cudahy ta. >> transfer of power is not minor. >> sean: you have to listen. this is not a game. what is happening in this country is dangerous and it needs to be stopped before the de

never mind the surveillance, unmasking and illegal leaks of intelligence.hat's reportedly why the fbi agents went to the white house to interview flynn back in january 24th about discussions that he had during the transition period with his counterpart, the russian ambassador about actions the obama administration had placed on russia. in the u.n. resolution on israel. big deal, that would have been his job. this is the interviewer flynn "lied" to the fbi. led to his guilty plea. again, nothing to do with russia. let's take a step back for a minute. during this transition period, obama state department said they didn't have any problems with the trump transition team reaching out to foreign officials. they said it. watch this. speak of this building say anything necessarily inappropriate about contact between members of the incoming administration and foreign officials, no matter what country they're from. >> know. again, this has been ongoing. we stand ready if they want to work through the state department to contact some of these individuals. but we have

i'm not even talking about uranium one and surveillance unmasks, jay. all of this needs to be investigated. >> well, the last you mentioned is something -- i mean, they are all serious. the last one you mentioned the idea of that it may well be that this does way put together by fusion gps and christopher steele and now bruce ohr's wife, bruce ohr was fourth ranking official at the department of justice may serve as the basis upon which a fisa warrant was issued. remember, that first time they went for that fisa warrant, it was turned down. then they get it later. was it based on this? if it was based on this, you are talking about the fruit of the poisonous tree. this could somehow exist within our system of justice, frankly is astonishing. but, sean, you look at these interconnections and this is really serious to the operation of justifiable. that's what's at stake here the constitution. >> sean: is it possible that hillary clinton and then hillary clinton's campaign and she is controlling the dnc according to donna brazile that her bought and paid f

michael flynn was unmasked by the obama administration. he was an obama official until he was fired. it's dangerous to the public it's an outrage this amount of money, time and evident is being spent to subvert this administration. >> mueller is on a scalp-hunting investigation. this is exhibit 3 or 4 of that. if you want to look at a criminal. look at sandy berger. he stole documents relating to 9/11 from the archives and destroyed them. lou: we have some clear criminal acts. we don't have to go any father than hillary clinton. whether we are talking about an administration in this instance that waits until there is less than a month left in office before president obama decides to retaliate against the russians for their intervention in our elections, he does nothing about crimea. what would you call that? >> it's criminal negligence. where are we going with this? and why isn't anyone talking about the context here and the actions of the administration with its unmasking of hundreds and hundreds of officials, american citizens, including

remember, he was a person of interest in the unmasking scandal.t appears the obama administration was deliberate by unleashing the steep state power to strike against the incoming president before he even took office and take a look at how former ambassador john bolton tonight is describing this mess that is going on in this country tonight. >> as "the wall street journal," this is the first example of coup d'etat in american history. it goes right along with the idea. to speak of the transfer of power is not minor. >> sean: you have to listen, this is not a game. what is happening in this country is dangerous. it needs to be stopped before the deep state can overthrow the president that you, the american people, voted for, a duly elected president. we'll have more on that in a minute. first, also tonight, we have scandals continuing to engulf the democratic party all across the spectrum. senator al franken, senator grove park, the one-time darling of the left, he is in dp political turmoil tonight. two or more women arecc accusing most senator of

truth you know and he said that's so well put there because there are so many you know we had this unmasking after the election but nobody ever talks about that we have we have the democrats they did not allow access to the d.n.c. server we know that the democrats and possibly f.b.i. was paying for this. dossier there's nobody talks about that in the mainstream media it's always pushed away because it doesn't further their agenda and instead they go after these myths with which i call a conspiracy without a crime of course i'm talking about russia gate go ahead and. well listen there are a couple things that are going on here one of the real problems i see is what we call the twenty four second news cycle everybody is racing to be first with a story they don't care particularly if the story is right if the facts are accurate they just want to be first to the headline because they make their money through whatever click bait that they can get and it's very difficult to hedge against this and i think you're absolutely correct there are certain standards of journalism that simply are being foll

i'm not even talking about uranium one and surveillance unmasks, jay.is needs to be investigated. >> well, the last you mentioned is something -- i mean, they are all serious. the last one you mentioned the idea of that it may well be that this does way put together by fusion gps and christopher steele and now bruce ohr's wife, bruce ohr was fourth ranking official at the department of justice may serve as the basis upon which a fisa warrant was issued. remember, that first time they went for that fisa warrant, it was turned down. then they get it later. was it based on this? if it was based on this, you are talking about the fruit of the poisonous tree. this could somehow exist within our system of justice, frankly is astonishing. but, sean, you look at these interconnections and this is really serious to the operation of justifiable. that's what's at stake here the constitution. >> sean: is it possible that hillary clinton and then hillary clinton's campaign and she is controlling the dnc according to donna brazile that her bought and paid for russian

going on the leaking the unmasking all of this there's no interest in it whatsoever in the mainstream media if you watch c.n.n. and they miss it b.c. it's not as if he didn't even happen i mean that's how dangerous things are and then they talk about things you know they talk about myths than unicorns that's what i call russia gate go ahead charles. well the largest unprosecuted fraud in history is going on right now that's the clinton foundation the obama foundation creating these fake foundations that our audit is where billions of dollars is sent towards these foundations but not accounted for where they're engaged in partisan activities where they're enriching the clinton family the obama family and all of that is supported in the case of the clinton foundation by the ivy league by the big universities the universities who if the drug ministration wanted to do this could be put out of business i mean you could go to a harvard which has support of the clinton foundation and say listen you're engaged in illegal enormous you're donating to a charity that doesn't exist we want to shut

in beijing four hundred fifty thousand euros to spend on the drive to unmask don't produce but only two kenyan athletes testing positive samples can be reanalyzed for a period of up to ten years. so sometimes you do though persia will just sort of to show. the case that that was fair does attitude and that is the me. because for the show's all these are what i when they said the opposite debate democrats went through the desert let the shadow for. these retroactive tests can shatter the podiums years after competitions since the london games russians are a poor was stripped of her gold medal in the three thousand meter steeplechase. the u.s. relay team lost their four silver medals and turned out to keane returned her gold medal for the one thousand five hundred meters via his left us barely made dialer saves me is one boy's them as what their sexual means their pleasure morning in their own but i. don't mean to infer that being your medina s. of the boys you there is those drugs no he will sign do is meet levy stace nozzles . theory elementary usage going on. nowadays any athlete is se

remember unmasking? people probably don't because it faded from view. that was going to be the scandal. donald trump was tweeting about it. the idea that names of americans that were blacked out in intelligence reports were improperly revealed and circulated. that went nowhere because both republican and democratic former senior intelligence officials said there was nothing improper here. this is how it works. we need sometimes to know these names. and my feeling is on this latest effort, if they have evidence of corruption at the highest levels of the justice department, i want to know about it and cover it and report about it. until you have proof, you know, i mean, we'll wait and see what they have that they can actually prove, nicolle. >> michael schmidt, let me get you in on this on the fbi agents union issuing a statement and it's lengthy. i direct everyone to read it because i've never seen anything like that come out of the fbi union before. pair that to the nunes report about him running a private investigation into fbi misconduct he viewed too

we have a president who has bent victim of an unprecedented unmasking scandal.nd look at fake news charges, an improper investigation. judge jeanine: dan, you couldn't write a book like this. no one would believe it would happen. chris, last word. >> there is a lot going on here. a lot to unpack. i think the special counsel will get to the bottom of it. the trump thing shows he's an honest guy, he removed strzok. judge jeanine: dan, finish. >> it's a scam. wake up. take the blinders off. judge jeanine: thanks so much. from the usual celebrity suspects to a local politician i heard outrageous things this week. joining me next is michael tammero. you judge jeanine: violence in chicago is out of control. take a listen to what one economy politician thinks is the answer to shep fight that violence. >> i'm hoping to appeal to the u.n. to come to chicago and meet with victims of violence and help out in terms of peacekeeping efforts because i think it's so critical for to us make sure these neighborhoods are safe. judge jeanine: u.n. peacekeepers? are you kidding me?

what about unmasking? that's coming up.ou into the promise land ♪ come on and take a free ride ♪ free ride ♪ come on na. ever since we switched to fedex ground business has been great. they're affordable and fast... maybe "too affordable and fast." what if... "people" aren't buying these books online, but "they" are buying them to protect their secrets?!?! hi bill. if that is your real name. it's william actually. hmph! affordable, fast fedex ground. and i know that we havethe phone accident forgiveness.nt, so the incredibly minor accident that i had tonight- four weeks without the car. okay, yup. good night. with accident forgiveness your rates won't go up just because of an accident. switching to allstate is worth it. it's what's insiden't the person who opens it. give ancestrydna, the only dna test that can trace your origins to over 150 ethnic regions. save 30% for the holidays at ancestrydna.com. hello there friend! hi! hey there. i'm an imaginary friend of a kid just like you. you're going through a lot right now and

we have a president who has bent victim of an unprecedented unmasking scandal.ake news charges, an improper investigation. judge jeanine: dan, you couldn't write a book like this. no one would believe it would happen. chris, last word. >> there is a lot going on here. a lot to unpack. i think the special counsel will get to the bottom of it. the trump thing shows he's an honest guy, he removed strzok. judge jeanine: dan, finish. >> it's a scam. wake up. take the blinders off. judge jeanine: thanks so much. from the usual celebrity suspects to a local politician i heard outrageous things this week. joining me next is michael tammero. you will love this segment. stay with us. hi...so i just got off the phone with our allstate agent, and i know that we have accident forgiveness. so the incredibly minor accident that i had tonight- four weeks without the car. okay, yup. good night. with accident forgiveness your rates won't go up just because of an accident. switching to allstate is worth it. if you have moderate to severe plaque psoriasis,... ...isn't it time to le

we have a president who has bent victim of an unprecedented unmasking scandal.ake news charges, an improper investigation. judge jeanine: dan, you couldn't write a book like this. no one would believe it would happen. chris, last word. >> there is a lot going on here. a lot to unpack. i think the special counsel will get to the bottom of it. the trump thing shows he's an honest guy, he removed strzok. judge jeanine: dan, finish. >> it's a scam. wake up. take the blinders off. judge jeanine: thanks so much. from the usual celebrity suspects to a local politician i heard outrageous things this week. joining me next is michael tammero. you (vo) the best gifts come with a special box. purchase $999 or more at helzberg diamonds and get an xbox one s, with 3 months of xbox game pass and xbox live gold. at helzberg diamonds. while supplies last. helping small businesses.ut, jamie -- damage your vehicle? we got you covered. [ glass shatters ] property damage? that's what general liability's for. what?! -injured employee? -ow. workers' comp helps you pay for a replacemen

and the end of the seagull is quite ambiguous, and you're not quite sure that the killer has been unmaskedice prevailing, i think. it's quite good, at the same time, isn't it, to have people wondering about the alternative explanations to an ending — to say, "ok, order has been restored, but i wonder how it happened?" yeah. no, i think that's... because you want the book to live on after the reader's finished it. that's interesting, yes. because everybody sees the book in a different way, that's why book clubs are so interesting, as you know. yes. people have different ideas, they see different pictures in their heads when they read. you have a way of creating an atmosphere, and i'm thinking, for example, of the shetland books, which, of course, made it to the small screen very, very successfully. and what was it about that atmosphere, there, the bleakness and bareness of shetland — which is very beautiful as well — that gave you the spark? i suppose i first went there a0... more than a0 years ago, because i dropped out of university and just by chance i got the job working in the bird obs