unmute the caller, please. i take that back. there are no callers. >> chair ronan: public comment is now closed. i am happy to send item 7 to the full board with positive recommendations. may i have a second? >> second by supervisor chan. roll call vote. >> on that motion by chair ronen, seconded by chanthis be forwarded to the board with positive recommendation. vice chair safai. >> aye. >> mar. >> aye. >> chan. >> aye. >> walton excused. chair ronen. >> aye. >> four ayes. we will hear on the port's budget. >> thank you, chair. our recommendations for the port of san francisco are on page 16 of our report. reductions for the proposed budget $393,836 in fiscal year 22-23. $43,836 are ongoing savings. $350,000 are one-time savings. that would allow increase over $100 million for the budget. our recommended reductions to the proposed budget $44,144 in 23-24. all of those recommended reductions are ongoing savings. my understanding is that the department agrees with the recommendations. we are available for any questions. >> chair

wait until you are unmuted to comment. mr. chair. >> chair preston: thank you. >> supervisor peskin: this is kicking around for a while and was at the full board way back. i thank the office of contract administration for putting this out to bid. that is in the process now. obviously, the city and city facilities need the refuse collected in the entire rum. hence this contract modification. hopefully the competitive bid process will beacon concluded long before the end of the two year extension which can be terminated or our convenience along the way if necessary. there are some amendments that office of contract administration is going to propose today that i suggest we adopt to necessarytate a continuance of this item. >> chair preston: thank you. welcome back. >> thank you. good morning again. i am the director of office contract administration. supervisor peskin mentioned i am here to present the amendment with recology for the city-wide refuge collection. we submitted to the board at the end of april. there were questions

if the staff would unmute you? if you indicated provoked by nodding, then stifle on you. -- if there is a technology issue during a member speaking time, we will move to the next member until the issue is resolved, and you will retain the balance of your time. we will be following the five minute rule. with 1 remaining in your time, the clock will turn yellow. when the clock turns red, it will be time to recognize the next. number we will be follow the speaking order set forth -- in order of seniority and we will alternate by party. next, we will go to members who are not present when the hearing was called to order, until every member has had a first round. members can submit information and writing it and infer hearings are markups, using the email address provided in advance to your staff. let us begin. today i welcome everyone to this morning's hearing for ice's 2023 budget request, we welcome tae johnson, acting director of u.s. immigration and customs enforcement. as a career civil servant, you have been aske

wait until the system indicateds you have been unmuted. no, we don't have public commenters on this for public comment. >> thank you. seeing no public speakers. public comment is closed. can you call item 11. >> yes agenda 11 is future agenda items if you wish to speak press star 3 to lineup to speak and the system will indicate you raised your hand. wait until we take comment and the system indicates you have been unmuted. >> colleagues are there ares any future agenda items to note? all right. now open up for public comment. member of the public had would like to comment on item 11, which is future agenda items? >> jaime is checking. if you have in the done so press star 3 to line up to speak and wait until the system indicates you have been unmuted. we are checking. pausing and we have no public commenters. >> thank you. no public speakers issue public comment is closed. and there is no further action to take on this matter. is there other business today. >> that concludes our business for today. why thank you. we are adjourned (♪♪) [ap

a system prompt will indicate you have been unmuted. and you can begin your comments.n have the first commenter in person. you may begin your comments. >> welcome. >> good morning, chair preston, supervisor mandelman. sorry supervisor chan had to step out. tracy mccray, the acting president of the police officers association. carol as her team, steve, jonathan said, we are in a unique position for the san francisco police department of the 1900 members that i am up here representing and the retention issue is a big issue for this city. we are losing officers with july of 2020 to present day. we have lost over 100 officers who have lateral to other agencies. and basically the things that you may want for your districts foot patrols, bike patrols, police officers going after violent criminals, that is all going to be severely impacted if we don't have officers out on the streets and retaining officers is probably the most important facet of the department right now. and unfortunately, there is no one here from the department to speak about that, but i will speak to the f

when you are unmuted begin your comments.am chair. >> chair ronan: good afternoon. >> thank you, supervisors for hearing this today. i am tiffany kearney, lead nutritionist. we are seeking the board approval to amend the grant agreement with self-help for the elderly for congregates nutrition services. it will increase grant funding to a total not to exceed $1,665,000. approximately 55% of the additional funding reflects the cost of doing business increases adopted by the city this year. the remaining 45% for additional meals and small amount of capital expenditures. self-help is largest congregates meal provider with 10 meal site this is seven districts and new site to open in the coming months. self-help is providing more meals to more clients since the beginning of the pandemic. they leveraged years of expertise to meet the extraordinary demand for newtrician support across the city while navigating challenging circumstances. self-help was able to adapt services and increase capacity while adhering to public health guideli

wait until you have been unmuted and that is your cue to begin your comments. both items on the agenda are eligible for public comment and we'll call public comment separately for each. the board of supervisors also accepts written correspondence by u.s. mail using the address the san francisco board of supervisors, number 1, dr. carleton b. good look place, san francisco, 94102 or the email address, and that concludes my communications, mr. >> president walton: thank you so much, madam clerk. and just want to thank the public who is here in attendance and those tuning in. as you know this is a special board of supervisors meeting, and then we will take a brief 10-minute recess after this meeting and go right into our budget and appropriations. so if you hear from budget and appropriations we'll start that meeting after this meeting. madam clerk, let's go to item number 1. >> clerk: adopting and implementing the memorandum of understanding with the service employees international local union, and staff and per diem nurses to be effective july 1, 2022, through j

i unmuted you. >> okay. is there a way to get it a little larger or is that -- are you seeing my slide deck now? yes. it is coming in no that make its that cuts it off. >> that cuts off half of it. let me try something else. better? >> a little bit. it is coming in partial instead of the full. port trait instead of landscape. i don't know if your monitor is set on. >> i put it on the other. is that better? >> the same. any better. no and we are not seeing the slide deck. they ever different from the presentation. let's see. just -- hang on one second. do you want me to give a shot at sharing. i have not done it before but -- um -- that is better. much better. okay. okay. okay. um -- so -- we have an agenda item where we stepped through our work plan for the year. mark and myself met with your liaison judy sanderlin last week to talk through the details. i gallon through quickly you are familiar and we have a detail on the plans to date for the fiscal year. this is a summary of the mandates of our unit which

i have unmuted you. go ahead. >> so let me say if we take city bills which are one -- the commissioner who is sitting down there knows the origins of city bills. city bills cannot produce workers that can build a hospital. we don't have any entity within the 33,000 workers who worked for our city and a city department who can build a hospital because those standards are high. hodgepodge standards. maybe one commissioner will know the details of what i'm talking about. there is one labor person there. he has no clue what i'm talking about. of the three contractors that bid this contract, clark construction is the better one. they had better accountability and transparency. but let me look at it another way. don't you think our unions should have the ability to have training and produce high-skilled workers. we don't have that. we have this ongoing sfpuc who prefers not to work sometimes with a union, not to work with the city, but to work in their own mickey mouse bay way. the bottom line is this is taxpa

ithink that was muted and unmuted again .ink i missed earlier and opportunity to thank ashley and her entire staff in the mayor's office and lisa sandler and her entire team in the controller's office for theirgood work on the budget thus far. on this particular issue , nice to see don. i'm sure she's been busy with lots of challenges over the school district, wreck and parks loss was the school districts gain but she's still doing good work for the public so to her and her colleagues thank you for your work over at unified on the shared schoolyards program which was as i recall led by then supervisor mark farrell and i think it's a unique and worthwhile partnership between the city, school district and community based organizations to use our public assets better foreveryone's benefit . i support the funding of this program. i understand it's a $600,000 item that seems like a relatively cheap investment with relatively substantial benefits for everyone and support that and i believe there are sufficient resources within the

press star, three to lineup to speak and begin your comments when your line has been unmuted. there are no callers in the queue. >> chair ronen: thank you. public comment is closed. can i get a roll call vote. [roll call] >> clerk: we have five ayes. >> chair ronen: that motion passes unanimously. mr. clerk, are there any other items on the agenda? oh, sorry. supervisor walton? >> president walton: thank you so much, chair ronen, and, you know, i don't want to prolong this any longer, but i want to thank the community for coming out and for your hard work and dedication to make sure that we provide the resources to support the services and all of you, for what you do for our community. i do have to give a big shout out to tracey brown gallardo from my office. [applause] >> president walton: to interns kayla and melinda and the entire district 10 team. i am excited that we have gotten to this point and appreciate everyone staying up with us here tonight, and i have to, 100%, give chair ronen her props. like, you have been amazing during this process. you know, we had conversati

wait until it tells you that you have been unmuted and you can begin your comments. mr. chair. >> thank you. floor is yours. >> thank you, chair mar. and after the efforts to address mental health and the lack of success with the sb1045 program that i championed several years ago to be having a conversation about another round of efforts at the state level to address conservatorship more broadly. i introduced a resolution on april 12 and initially is something that we would approve without committee reference. and at issue is a package introduced by senator susan eggman to modernize the state's behavioral health continuum and the particular bills are sb929, 965, 970, 1035, 1154, 1227, 1238 and 1416. and i am going to tell you a little bit about each of them. and i introduced this resolution because i believe the passage of the bills would represent a significant assumption of responsibility on the part of the state when it comes to oversight of behavioral health services and outcomes and unnecessary and overdue step to demonstrate the inability to make progress on their

can you unmute our caller? >> david philpowe and i do support the b.l.a.ations and i very much appreciate the additional scrutiny being given to the admin provision for the a.a.o. and a.s.o. i doesn't always happen but to the extent it's happening now and perhaps will happen in the future i think there's additional sets of eyes looking at the admin provisions. those are the control provision of both ordnances as to spending and position control. very important for how the city manages its city personnel. >> clerk: thank you for your comments. do we have more speakers in the queue? madame chair, there are no more callers. >> supervisor: public health >> supervisor: public comment is closed. i'd like to have a second to file. seconded by president walton. roll call vote. >> clerk: on the motion both hearings be heard and filed by chair ronen seconded by chair walton. vice chair safai, aye. chan, aye. walton, aye. ronen, aye. >> supervisor: they pass unanimously. mr. clerk can we get to the meat of this meeting and call items 8 and 9. >> clerk: yes, madame ch

if you unmute first. i can i was expecting to hear from christina first you prefer i respond to them now or sure if that's okay. yeah. well, thank you liz for that excellent summary of the book and also for these penetrating questions on just thinking how i can. respond with a degree of economy that will take up too much time. so we have time for more general. conversation the first question how to how do i reconcile the free market aspects of the ideology with the willingness to intrude as much as the need of victorians have or at some point we're willing to do. into private life a part of the interesting exercise of looking into neoliberals or those who supported freeing market forces was the worries that they themselves had about whether ordinary people would be able to sustain themselves in conditions of a free market economy that they wouldn't give into excess. regarding debt sex the media gratification um, perhaps lose discipline at work. in other words they were alert to the problem of the problems

unmute the first person, please. >> caller: good afternoon. so a couple of quick comments. i think the references here on the list are to the old super advisor y'all districts was the lists were created prior to april 28th. i was going to ask about the context and pms or pci scores and it was covered. i was going to ask about pavement methods by segment but i did find that buried in one of the charts so i'm trying to pull that up. it says that the works scope for that project includes grind and pave for various blocks so it looks like they're all grind and paved as opposed to reconstruction or the various types of pavement methods but i've got that information and i was going to mention criticality and need and pci score versus geographic equity and it seems that there is some geographic distribution which is fine, but generally the streets that get more use and get banged up more, should get pavement resources and although there's some distribution, in terms of geography it should be based on need in my view. i do agree that there should be for dinnation with mta puc and o

if i noticed that you have not unmuted yourself, i will ask if you would like staff to unmute you. if you indicate approval by nodding, staff will unmute your microphone. they will not unmute your microphone under any other conditions. i would like to remind members that we have established an email inbox for submitting documents for and during committee proceedings. we have distributed that email, addressed to your staff. now i will introduce our witness. this morning, we will be hearing from doctor philip swagel, the director of the congressional budget office. i will yield myself -- for an opening statement. good morning, i wanted to thank dr. phillips whale, director of the congressional budget office, for appearing before our committee today to testify on cbos newly released budget and economic outlook. also known as the cbo baseline. doctor swindle, your agency isn't indispensable partner to congress. and to the house budget committee, and in particular, i want to thank all of your dedicated staff for their hard work and putting out this report. we are holding this committee

those on hold wait until you are unmuted. it looks like six listeners and two in queue. next caller. >> good afternoon. the program could solve this. from the follow up, delay when you apply to get approved. i got approved for one i applied for two years ago. i think that is part of the reason for the follow up. it doesn't look like an approval e-mail. one suggestion to centralize to make it consistent. bring in the non-profits who work directly with the people. they have insight. they are in the middle of the developers and clients. they will give you perspective. thank you. >> clerk: last caller. >> caller: principal in cfo and local housing developer. we operate 224bmr units in san francisco. it is the market. we are huge, huge supporters of the program. we have a great partnership. we are huge supporters of the program. there are areas to improve. it takes a long time to fill a vacant bmr unit. getting the process to ensure equity. the last building we leased in 2018 it took seven months to get the first bmr movement, seven months after available for move in. the mar

please wait until the system indicates your line has been unmuted before you begin your comments. it looks like we have six listeners and no callers in the queue. >> chair mar: okay. public comment is closed. i will make a motion that this license will serve the public convenience and necessity and that we forward this to the full board with a positive recommendation. on that motion, please call the roll. [roll call] >> clerk: you have three ayes. >> chair mar: so this'll be sent to the full board with a positive recommendation. madam clerk, please call item 2. >> clerk: item 2 is a hearing to consider that the issue wean of a type 64 special a-sale general theater liquor license to thelostchurch.org, inc. located at 665 chestnut street, will serve the public convenience or necessity of the city and county of san francisco. >> chair mar: once again, i'll invite officer samuelson to present. >> okay. thelostchurch.org have applied for a type 64 special asale license. they're in section 35, which is high crime, tract 1100, a high saturation. we recommend approval with two conditions

for those already in the queue, please continue to wait until the system indicate you have been unmuted. there's nobody in line to speak in the chamber. we have three listeners but nobody online to speak. >> chair peskin: okay public comment on item 1 is closed. i will make a motion to amend the subject motion by removing the word rejecting in the title and removing the word reject at line 7 on that motion. a roll call please. >> clerk: on that motion to amend. [roll call vote] the motion passes without objection. >> chair peskin: i will make a motion to send this item as amended with recommendation to the full board of supervisors. >> clerk: on that motion. [roll call vote] the motion passes without objection. >> chair peskin: next item please. congratulations ms. newhouse segal. sounds like you will have no summer vacation. rachael, tell her she can't go anywhere in august. she's here in august. all right. next item please. >> clerk: next, item 2, hearing considering appointing two members. to the mental health s.f. implementation working group. we have two seats and two applicants. >

. >> hello caller, you're unmuted. your three minutes begins now. >> david, i'm just testing to be sure i can be heard. >> we can hear you. >> charles, good, thank you. >> thank you. >> any further callers in the queue? seeing no further callers in the queue, public comment on this item has closed. >> thank you, kyle. next item, please. >> the next item in the agenda is item 3, approval of minutes of the may 10, 2022, commission on the environment special meeting and explanatory document, may 10th and 2022, draft minutes and discussion and action. >> i'll move approve -- approval of minutes. >> motion by commissioner sullivan and any other discussion on this. if not, let's open it up for public comment. >> we will begin with public comment in the room. once in-person comment have concludes, we'll proceed to remote public comment. anyone in person that would like to speak for public comment. seeing none, we'll proceed to remote public comment. members public who wish to make a public comment should press star three to b

let me go ahead and unmute them. welcome, caller. your two minutes begins now. >> so this is what i have to say. when you all talk about racial equity, i don't see the racial equity represented on many of the commissions. but more than that, you're planning to have citizens advisory committee. experienced people should be on that committee. now we had this circus at the hunters point. we had committees appointed and then deactivated. most of us do not know at one time this was called treasure island hunters point annex. in other words, treasure island played the main role. that's where the navy had their headquarters, their admirals. this city ever since 1976 has failed san franciscans. more than hunters point than treasure island. and you have representatives with no history because they -- san francisco. they come from somewhere else and pretend they know something, but they know nothing. so i'm not going to be speaking again and again, except to warn you all this, stop this buffoonery. hood winking us in broad daylight, spending m

ithink that was muted and unmuted again .n and seconded by supervisor walton that the hearing regarding budgets be heard and filed . >>. [roll call vote] we have 5 aye's. >> that motion passes unanimouslyand do we have any other business ? >> that concludes our business. >> the meeting is adjourned. >> >> it had been rain for several days. at 12:30 there was a notice of large amount of input into the reservoir. we opened up the incident command and started working the incident to make sure employees and the public were kept were safe there is what we call diversion dam upstream of moccasin. the water floods the drinking water reservoir. we couldn't leave work. if the dam fails what is going to happen. >> we had three objectives. evacuate and keep the community and employees safe. second was to monitor the dam. third objective was to activate emergency action plan and call the agencies that needed contacted. >> the time was implement failure of the dam. we needed to set up for an extended incident. we got people evacuated down

ithink that was muted and unmuted again .ink i missed earlier and opportunity to thank ashley and her entire staff in the mayor's office and lisa sandler and her entire team in the controller's office for theirgood work on the budget thus far. on this particular issue , nice to see don. i'm sure she's been busy with lots of challenges over the school district, wreck and parks loss was the school districts gain but she's still doing good work for the public so to her and her colleagues thank you for your work over at unified on the shared schoolyards program which was as i recall led by then supervisor mark farrell and i think it's a unique and worthwhile partnership between the city, school district and community based organizations to use our public assets better foreveryone's benefit . i support the funding of this program. i understand it's a $600,000 item that seems like a relatively cheap investment with relatively substantial benefits for everyone and support that and i believe there are sufficient resources within the

wait until you are unmuted. they will begin your comments.we have the speaker line open. >> holder in west harbor i want to speak against proposed surcharge. the rates were set at a time when dredging was ordinary wear and tear of the harbor. only reason the money is needed because east harbor is running a deficit. why? because it was neglected. it is setted in. the docks are falling apart. the see has a settlement. p.g.e. dragged foot for 20 years. now it is going to be ripped out. now what we are doing is robbing peter popapal. a landlord with a empty building assessing the people with the full building. east harbor is half empty. west is full. it makes no sense to assess people in west harbor for this ordinary wear and tear. there is plenty of money pg&e. rec and park is doing improvements in outer west. take a little more? this is pg&e responsibility from the foot dragging that called the project. it was $10,000,000.20 years ago. it -- $10 million over 20 years ago. thank you. >> no further speakers in the chamber. any speakers in the que

those on hold wait until you are unmuted. it looks like six listeners and two in queue. next caller. >> good afternoon. the program could solve this. from the follow up, delay when you apply to get approved. i got approved for one i applied for two years ago. i think that is part of the reason for the follow up. it doesn't look like an approval e-mail. one suggestion to centralize to make it consistent. bring in the non-profits who work directly with the people. they have insight. they are in the middle of the developers and clients. they will give you perspective. thank you. >> clerk: last caller. >> caller: principal in cfo and local housing developer. we operate 224bmr units in san francisco. it is the market. we are huge, huge supporters of the program. we have a great partnership. we are huge supporters of the program. there are areas to improve. it takes a long time to fill a vacant bmr unit. getting the process to ensure equity. the last building we leased in 2018 it took seven months to get the first bmr movement, seven months after available for move in. the mar

when you are unmuted this is time to speak. for those on hold continue to wait until the system indicates you are unmuted. we will wait for the moderator to let us know if there is anyone in the public comment queue via webex. >> board secretary we have one callers. zero callers have entered. you must dial star 3 now if you want to join public comment for this specific item. we will wait 5 more seconds and in the close public comment for the agenda item. there are no callers at this time. >> thank you. public comment is now closed. >> thank you very much and thank you for the comment. close item 4 so move to item 5. >> thank you. item 5 is approval with possible modification of the minutes of meeting set forth below. action item pertain to april 28, 2022 health board strateg planning meeting and may 12, 2022. >> i open for discussion and motion? >> i move that the minutes as distributed for both meetings be accepted and approved. >> second. >> it is moved and seconded the minutes as outlined in the agenda accepted and approved.