nature is a lot of sand and weeds basically and what we produce now what we call native plants are unnotifying and dry and not really usually. so i think that parks have to be someplace where someone wants to go and they have to be surfaced that are flat and green and appealing for people. so i would air to the side you know of whatever we've done as everyone knows this is an ininviting sandy often cold peninsula and if it were not for the parks create in san francisco no one would want to be here. i think there's a lot to be said on this. on the elimination of the trees i strike a middle ground. we don't want to have is wholesale elimination of the trees because they were not originally here. their healthier if the light is in there are also it's cold and damp in areas so letting more the in will allow other trees to do better. we have to balance the open space with housing. we have a finite area we have to use our land judiciously and we need land for housing. if we have existing parks around twin peaks i'm going saying you element that area but we could use it is important more housing. mcc