the fine of $100 for being unpermitted. so you were a scooter company that had 50 scooters deployed in san francisco over a course of days then that would be 50 citations. >> director torres: these companies are worth $4,100 -- are worth $400 million. $100 is nothing to these people. they will continue to laugh at us. we have to look at that number one. number two, section 916 which supervisor peskin's aide talked about in terms of past behavior, can reconsidered putting that into regulations? >> we would offer input from the board on past behavior. i think there's some discretion that already exists in the language as proposed and maybe during public comment i can ask our attorney and staff to explore the ability we have to do that and if not i would certainly be open to that. i think it would be appropriate. >> director torres: i've been hearing complaints from bart they they are left in access to transit. are we conversing with bart as to their input? >> we have not been in touch with bart yet. there are a lot of agencie

we have two clear, unpermitted demolitions that dbi refuses to enforce. i could give you five more examples. today's demolition discussion was put on the agenda to address the lack of enforcement and dbi has talked around the issue of their failure to enforce code section 103a. failure to enforce building code is much more than building safety. the issue at 655 alvarado is replacing a 900 square foot house with a a story 5,500 square foot how's. how would you feel if you lived next to 655 alvarado. i would also like to mention that should be the adjudication at 214 state street if you had properly classified it as a demolition. thank you. >> thank you. >> good morning, commissioners. this particular project is slightly different than 214 because this one clearly you can see that there's nothing left out of the building. if what 214 states you can say that there was something, maybe the second floor that's been supported through shoring, this one has nothing. this is clearly a demolition that was not permitted. as he pointed out, even the building code sta

both face 36 counts of involuntary manslaughter one charge for each person who died during the unpermitted dance party in the building. prosecutors say the two men created a may see and death trap. but the defense says their clients are being scapegoated and that there's no evidence that the men were criminally negligent. now, the defense is also arguing that the evidence was improperly secured when the warehouse was released back to the owner. almena's wife was in the courtroom. we saw her crying. she responded as the judge said he is allowing the case to move forward. >> i'm really disappointed that the motion got dismissed today. i don't think that was right. i don't think that, you know, this -- this whole thing is -- i don't feel that it's just. and -- >> -- >> of course i do. >> reporter: now, almena will not be released on bail. harris' attorney said the defendant could be released with zero bail. that follows a landmark case in which the judge said that alternatives should be considered to jail for those defendants who cannot afford to bail out. so the next time max harris is expec

we do have an open enforcement case about unpermitted horizontal addition to the rear of this building to the six unit apartment building, not to the garage. in response to that complaint and that open enforcement case, the property owner has filed a permit to legalize that construction and that is currently being reviewed by the planning department. so all in you will a, thall, t tloerl reviewed by the department. it does meet all the requirements for adding an adu. you can only do one adu in this particular building, and it was appropriately reviewed, and i would respectfully request that you uphold the permit and deny the appeal, and i'm available for any other questions you may have. >> i've got a question, mr. teague. so it was a six units. so was there a soft story retrofit involved in this, as well. >> you mean of the apartment building? >> yeah, correct. >> i'm not aware that there is. >> and then -- >> i forgot to go over the plans, too. if you want to see them -- >> well, it's just kind of tough when people come before us and they don't submit a brief. it makes it really hard

and penalty decision to sf freelon holdings llc alleging violations of the planning code for the unpermitted office use. complaint number 2017-008013enf. item number 7 has been withdrawn. this is appeal number 18-015 concerning the subject property at 99 st. germain avenue asking dbi to revoke number 2017 [indiscernible] to allow the planning department to process bpa to address the correct scope of work. finally item 8 is withdrawn number 18-047 concerning 1973 broadway street. protesting the issuance on march 22nd, 2018 to chris porter of an alteration permit revision to structural design for bpa2015-04153728 due to existing site conditions. this is application number 2018-03193985. so this will be a short meeting tonight. so we'll move on to the next item. item number one is general public comment. this is an opportunity for anyone who would like to speak on a matter within the jurisdiction but not on the calendar. is there anyone here for public comment? seeing none, we'll move on to item 2. commissioner comments and questions. okay. seeing none, we will move on to item number 3, the ado

to obtain a permit and collection of administrative penalties for parking or leaving standing an unpermitted power scooter subject to the pilot powered scooter share permit program. say that five times fast on a sidewalk street or other right of way making corrections in division ii. >> very good. mr. mcguire, are we hearing from you today? >> good afternoon, directors. tom mcguire, director of the sustainable streets division at mta. the bulk of the presentation will be done by my colleague, who is the acting head of our bicycle section. i just want to give a little bit of background here. on april 17th the board of supervisors unanimously passed an ordnance that requires companies who offer shared motorized scooters on the streets of san francisco obtain a permit to operate from the sfmta. today we are here to consider enacting that permitting system to we can put in place the board of supervisors vision for that ordnance and the themes you will hear from the presentation and in all of our comments is that we believe that any use of the public right of way, sidewalk, street, bike lane, oug

continue to reward or bad actors, and we don't think it's accepting responsibility so say oh, no, this unpermitted rollout is not the problem, it's our people are the problem. it's the neighborhood impacts are the problem. it's all one system, and they're responsible for all of it, and we're all responsible for all of it. so i think that the other thing we want to think about is let's -- let's take our time and do this right. we don't need to keep moving on the planning schedule, right? these are not our urban planners. you're our urban planners, right, and the planning department's our urban planners. we want to move on our timetable and do things right. this is going to be a pilot program, typically, it paves the way for what comes next pretty thoroughly, right? we all see this over and over, so what we want to do is start with what is our real overall equity framework on every level. let's not hurry forward a program before we know where we're headed. let's think about what are those elements that we want to put into it, and what are not. we're hearing ceqa and environmental concerns. we'd like