they say there is illegal and unpermitted work.and so, how that equals a recommendation, i don't know. but under the conditional use, one of the determinations that you are charged with making under three '03 f. is about whether or not the applicant submitted false or misleading information during th permitting process. and they certainly have. that is a finding that you are required to make to grant a conditional use. that is three '03 f. and whether or not that had a substantial impact on the permit that they are requesting. don't reward this. don't endorse a project two and a half years later that went forward without any permits. >> thank you. any additional public comment on this item? >> my name is paul -- >> are you part of their team? >> yeah. >> unfortunately your time is up. any other public comments? seeing none, we will close public comment. >> what is interesting is today was a bit of a milestone for the city. we've been dealing with these kinds of cases now, at least for the four years i've been on the commission, the

new safeguards are needed to ensure police are able to get unpermitted vehicles off the road. >> it's more critical as more companies put cars on the road that won't have any human beings. there need to be clear understanding about how law enforcement can get those cars off the road should they pose to be dangerous or unpermitted. >> self-driving cars should be able to guard against cyberattacks and simulate real-world driving. it must also show the vehicles will stop when pulled over by a police officer. the new bill is backed by t. >>> it's illegal in california to feed deer. this follows an increased visit of mountain lions. they like t eat deer and pet. people are advised to keep their pets in at night and bring in their food. don't feed the deer. >>> a raccoon that became the talk of the country is back in the wild. the animal control released her today after a several-hour saga that started yesterday. the raccoon scaled a 20-story office building in st. paul, minnesota. after several hours of climbing and stopping to take naps, the raccoon reached the top there. on the roof, you

the second question is how long has the existing unpermitted structure been there? >> i was not -- >> okay, you don't know. >> i don't know when it was built, i was called in after the notice of violation was received. >> then my question to staff would be, what state did you find the unpermitted structure? was it under construction? was it finished? >> he took pictures. in my estimation probably 3-4 months before he was there. first violation issued may 7th. >> it's under construction then, the department would say. >> let me just mention that both the owners, their english is very limited. so a lot of the correspondence may be -- they may not be aware of what these letters are. after i was retained, i tried to explain to them all the paperwork that's involved and have attended the director's hearing and explained to them that this is a process and this is how we have to get it legalized and have to go through this neighborhood notice process. and we did all that. and now we are ready to get the full permit to finalize the legalization. >> just through the chair, w

for the unpermitted demolition. in the b.i.c. meeting, d.b.i. employees and the project architect and contractor engaged in a detailed justification of why the building was demolished. however, all the parties sidestepped why building code section 103(a) was not enforced. discussing justifications for building code violations without discussing polish happens much too often in b.i.c. meeting. no b.i.c. member asked the contractor or the architect why they did not file for demolition permits before removing the house or asked d.b.i. employees why they did not issue an m.o.v. for demolition without a demolition permit. i find this incredibly disappointing. in the meeting i passed out copies of two whistle blower complaints i filed with the city's auditor. the home at 5999 hopkins avenue. i am unable to reconcile the city controller's action with the b.i.c.'s inaction regarding 49 hopkins avenue. thank you. >> clerk: any additional public comment? seeing none, item four, commissioner's questions and matters, 4(a), inquiries to staff. at this time,

while the property owner originally proposed to legalize all the unpermitted alterations, the planning department worked with the property owner to remove certain features that were not necessary. preservation staff reviewed the front facade and gave ceqa clearance for the stucco conversion while planning staff reviewed the number of bedrooms and bathrooms in the house. in the end, the final number was ensuring that each bedroom was livable and the dwelling had sufficient living space to accommodate all of those bedrooms. the final tally was ten bedrooms and six full bathrooms. it should be noted that the planning code does not limit the number of bedrooms in a single-family dwelling which gave us some issues in figuring out how to analyze this. there were numerous complaints in opposition to the process during the initial enforcement in this by neighbors. since notification of the hearing, the department has received eight statements of opposition from neighbors and one phone call with the previously mentioned issues as reasoning. while the size of the dwelling is somewhat large at 28

amnesty is being offered to owners of unpermitted units to bring them into compliance. >>> mary has as running right around where they should be and some spots a little cooler. starting tomorrow, get ready for a big warm up. here is a live look at our ocean beach camera, blue skies and low clouds in the distance. that is a really pretty site.. sighttran01 that is a really pretty sight. high pressure will continue to build as we head through the weekend especially for the weekend. your weather headlines, low clouds back tonight and they warm up begins tomorrow. we have the san francisco pride parade, mostly hot conditions in alameda for the county fair and pleasant and sunny and hot at 100 degrees. drink a lot of water and put on that sunscreen. highs for tomorrow, upper 60s in san francisco, upper 80s for concord and livermore. here's a look at what you can expect. we are going to begin to warm up tomorrow and into the weekend. low 90s inland tomorrow and about 70 for the bay. starting with triple digits heat on friday. the hotter day out of the weekend will be saturday. >>> she has g

they are unpermitted. and on the third visit, they were found not to be hosting entertainment, so that is good. our work in the field is paying off. >> and i.d. scanners were in use and guards had shirts with security in plain view. there was a small crowd. we waited until they closed, and everything went off without a hitch. those are the new conditions that were placed on the permit last time. redford had imagine and we have reached out to them regarding the permitting process to see if there is something they are interested in do you think. just one complaint and i think it was a one-off event. we did a sound inspection on june 16. they were found to be in compliance. and i believe that is all i've got for you. happy to answer any questions. >> is hugh on the wely inspection schedule? what is the plan around monitoring them? >> the inspectors have gone twice already and by the time they got there and were already completely closed. and that is the date that is listed here in which they saw them in compl

the two phases of construction tacked watch what phases of the unpermitted illegal and out of scope construction that i would like to explain to you. the first is there as an expansion to a bay window with a top roof deck that had been approved for plans. in my package i provided you and archive rear wall photo exhibit showing the, kind of slow expansion of this part of the building. what was originally a square bay became an angled bay with an angle that was expanded outward within it angled bay or deck on top as well as a triangular wing of volume. based on the photo evidence that i found, this construction appeared to happen between 2010 and 2011. starting with the current owner of the building, there began a project of excavation and interior alteration, including to create a second unit at these two subterranean levels i have mentioned. and a serious f-15 over-the-counter permits that were filed between august 2014 and december of 2017. some of the work that did occur was not covered in the scope of permit and in total, d.b.i. has issued eight violations for this work, and currently stopped

and penalty decision to sf freelon holdings llc alleging violations of the planning code for the unpermitted office use. complaint number 2017-008013enf. item number 7 has been withdrawn. this is appeal number 18-015 concerning the subject property at 99 st. germain avenue asking dbi to revoke number 2017 [indiscernible] to allow the planning department to process bpa to address the correct scope of work. finally item 8 is withdrawn number 18-047 concerning 1973 broadway street. protesting the issuance on march 22nd, 2018 to chris porter of an alteration permit revision to structural design for bpa2015-04153728 due to existing site conditions. this is application number 2018-03193985. so this will be a short meeting tonight. so we'll move on to the next item. item number one is general public comment. this is an opportunity for anyone who would like to speak on a matter within the jurisdiction but not on the calendar. is there anyone here for public comment? seeing none, we'll move on to item 2. commissioner comments and questions. okay. seeing none, we will move on to item number 3, the ado

they need to know with the they're rights are, especially when it comes to unpermitted a.d.u.s. a friend of mine is dealing with the fact that their landlord didn't want to deal with this process. got an illegal a.d.u. they live in it and they're worried they will be evicted. if they were able to access what their rights are when the landlord now wants to do improvements to the building, they with not be calling me every three days asking me, what can i do? what can i do? and i would not be scrambling to try to figure out the answer to that question. thank you. >> president hillis: thank you. next speaker, please. >> hello again. steven bosh. i want to say how amazing it is that everyone agrees that streaming aordable housing is the right thing to do. i think there's been two people that say they don't support it because it streamlines market rate. i know you read your packet. it does not streamline market rate. so everybody is in agreement. it's fantastic. it's what we've been talking about for a long time and time to do it. i'm -- i'm ambivalent about the notification changes.

this is an unpermitted street gathering.these good people in jail because they're proud of their country? is that right? you got my lawyer on the phone? >> standing by. >> you got bail money? >> with interest. >> send 'em up! [ cheers and applause ] >> jimmy: my laywer. oh, hey! send 'em up! oh, love it. "gotti" this weekend. go check it out in theaters. i've also got to say today is a a big day, because it's the 40th anniversary of the premier in new york city today of "grease." >> amazing. [ cheers and applause ] >> jimmy: and that's cool. >> how about that? >> jimmy: i mean, just the fact you made "grease." i know you've probably talked about it a zillion times. but you're such a great singer in that, as well. >> aw, thank you. >> jimmy: we just had a karaoke party the other day, for our nieces. they're probably 10 or 12 years old, they all are singing your song and doing you. they're doing impressions of you. i'm like, it's just -- not only your singing, but your dancing obviously. everyone knows you for your dancing as