some of his works went unrecorded after the painter died they were probably hidden away during the inventory for the inheritance. but that is what this report suggests by the director of the so administration who represents the families interests. it is likely that escaped the inventory as they have been hidden by. this is that to be the case for the two disputed paintings. accused of being involved in the theft of the two portraits. defends himself and declares that he did indeed pay catherine you don't. apparently asked him to pay money not directly to the heiress but to a trust fund and offer a company based in a tax haven. close to the. well if they. don't want this if it is if it is a fair.

some of his works went unrecorded after the painter died they were probably hidden away during the inventory for the inheritance. but that is what this report suggests by the director of the butt caso administration who represents the family's interests. it is likely that certain works escaped the inventory as they had been hidden by. this is thought to be the case for the two disputed paintings. accused of being involved in the theft of the two portraits. defends himself and declares that he did indeed pay katherine you don't earn lowers apparently asked him to pay money not directly to the because so heiress but to a trust fund an offshore company based in a tax haven. because to understand shine the community have to benefit the. ball on this if it is if there's a fear of it. says. you know us and the disc in support. of us adults on the promises we should shine so the cost. to prove his claims he shows us this document which is apparently the receipt for payment for the two portraits. m.-e. i invest bouvier's company paid eight million dollars to nobody oh trust based at the central bank

some of his works went unrecorded after the painter died they were probably hidden away during the inventory for the inheritance. but that is what this report suggests by the director of the picasso administration who represents the families interests. it is likely that escape the inventory as they had been hidden by. this is going to be the case for the two disputed paintings. accused of being involved in the theft of the two portraits. defends himself and declares that he did indeed pay katherine you don't lower is apparently asked him to pay money not directly to the heiress but to a trust fund and offshore company based in a tax haven. close to the stone shine. and have to be the. phonies if there's a fear of it. sir. thanks to you doesn't mean the disk and support his cause fer sure if yes it does on the promises you think we should shine so the cost. to prove his claims he shows us this document which is apparently the receipt for payment for the two portraits. m.-e. i invest bouvier's company paid eight million dollars to nobody oh trust based at the central bank investor who's capita

some of his works went unrecorded after the painter died they were probably hidden away during the inventory for the inheritance. but that is what this report suggests by the director of the picasso administration who represents the families interests. it is likely that certain words escaped the inventory as they had been hidden by. this is the ought to be the case for the two disputed paintings. accused of being involved in the theft of the two portraits. defends himself and declares that he did indeed pay catherine you done earlier is apparently asked him to pay money not directly to the bokassa heiress but to a trust fund an offshore company based in a tax haven. called the costliest and shine upon gold the community of occasion have to benefit the caribou in a community demand i mean don juan there's a phonies if there's a fear of it all soft like say oh you know us and then this could support his cause fair so if you set off on the promises or essential and saw the cost. to prove his claims he shows us this document which is apparently the receipt for payment for the two portraits. emmi

> looked at a bunch of studies across the board and you are absolutely right, since so much was unrecorded. based on the data, the fbi data this year, someone said earlier there is a 5% increase, a 13% increase on hate crimes by religion, the hate crimes were anti-jewish and in 24% were anti-muslim. the anti-jewish and anti-muslim incidents in the previous year, i looked at surveys by the coalition and it appears the numbers are rising because it is a good thing it is more important but every service shows numbers on the rise. >> am i allowed to have -- looking at the data, surprised at what the data was for latinos given what is going on in the world but wondering how much of that is attributable to the increasing fear of the community, not just undocumented but those who live with undocumented but mixed households. i was wondering if you could tell me if i am totally off-base. >> that is correct. to go to the earlier point, whether there is a rise in reporting on hate crimes, when looking at a population like those who live in a mixed status family, a decrease in hate crimes being report

what happened here, where the factors that led to the recommended approval are completely unknown, unrecorded, and unnoted anywhere in the record, and i made sure of that. i requested records over and over and over. there's no note of how 2.5 years of udat recommendations were suddenly reversed. what code section reversed those? for 2.5 years, the udat said we favor two buildings. they then said we strongly favor two buildings, and all of that was swept aside. i've submitted those materials. it's exhibit two through four of the udat recommendations. udat even went so far as to draw a plan and submit it to the developers and say look, here's how the two-building project will work. you get the same number of units, more size units, and it's more code compliant than what you're proposing. there's no analysis at all about the urban design guidelines, and this project grossly violates every single one of the design elements of that new passed law. that's exhibit six that i submitted. please take a look at that. >> thank you, mr. williams, your time is up. >> thank you. we ask for your support. >>